Real Analysis 22 | Cauchy Product

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 4 місяці тому +2

    Your table reminds me of the way Cantor laid-out the Rational Numbers to show that they are countable.

  • @MathShala1010
    @MathShala1010 3 роки тому +8

    Example is just absolute beauty !!...thanks

  • @MrOvipare
    @MrOvipare 3 роки тому +3

    I have been using this identity for exponential function for so long... It's nice to finally see a proof!
    One of my favorite application of this property was in statistical mechanics where we would express some systems with the grand-canonical potential to later derive the thermodynamic properties of those ensembles. We would define a grand potential function that had a sum of the microstates within an exponential function and it was often useful (or cute) to represent this with the Pi notation (product operator).

  • @mohammedalihilalhassan4910
    @mohammedalihilalhassan4910 3 роки тому +8

    This explanation is so good ! Thank you so much for the explanation really :,( your channel is underrated.. I hope you get more audciance you deserve it. Thank you again for the clean explanation :D !

  • @noahallen9457
    @noahallen9457 2 роки тому +2

    Was going through Penrose's Road to Reality and he had this problem of proving from the power series definition that exp(1/2)^2=e. Only hint was the definition of binomial coefficient. One long rabbit hole later and this video was a perfect explanation. Thanks!

  • @GeoffryGifari
    @GeoffryGifari Рік тому +2

    so in a way cauchy product formula transforms a product of series into a *composition* of series?

  • @jeffreyhowarth7850
    @jeffreyhowarth7850 Рік тому +1

    So foiling is distributive at 1:25?

  • @jstee5
    @jstee5 2 роки тому

    Love the way you explain things and the clear presentation in your videos.
    I have seen several other sources state that both a and b must be absolutely convergent for the Cauchy product to be absolutely convergent whereas you suggest that one of a and b may be conditionally convergent.
    Can you clear this up please. Thanks.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 роки тому

      Wow, thank you! If you look at the proof of the statement, you will see that we only this assumption.

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 роки тому

      You can find my lecture notes about the topic to read the proof :)

  • @H0tinNYC
    @H0tinNYC 3 роки тому

    Beautifully done!

  • @karlfriedmann5320
    @karlfriedmann5320 Рік тому +2

    Can somone explain to me why every "package" only has finitely many elements ?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Рік тому +1

      Do you see the picture in the thumbnail? That explains it already. Each package is a finite ellipse/package there.

  • @severed_toast
    @severed_toast Рік тому

    how did you get the formula for c_k in the example?

  • @JadChamseddine-i3k
    @JadChamseddine-i3k 3 місяці тому

    love u

  • @opokufrederick6074
    @opokufrederick6074 2 місяці тому

    Soo beautiful