The Ricardian Model Simply Explained in 5 Minutes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 50

  • @mikarunge
    @mikarunge 3 роки тому +10

    I stared at my book for hours and listened to lecture for a whole period. Meanwhile I could just watch this vid and understand it within 5 min. It was that simple. Thank you

  • @zzaanndd2106
    @zzaanndd2106 6 років тому +105

    I just wish my international Trade course would also begin with Jojo's music...

  • @KennyyD
    @KennyyD 4 роки тому +22

    As soon as I heard the JoJo music, I knew you were a man of culture.

  • @kaiyawhitfield734
    @kaiyawhitfield734 3 роки тому +6

    the jojos intro really just put the cherry on top thank you so much

  • @robertoalejandrolugomaldon1277

    Simple, elegant, and straight to the point. Thank you very much sir.

  • @giampaolokirnbauer6690
    @giampaolokirnbauer6690 Рік тому +1

    Very useful my friend

  • @faniliciouse
    @faniliciouse 7 років тому +3

    this is a great video for grasping the crux and basis of these theories! try putting 'simplified' or something of the sort in the title so more people can find it. loved it.

  • @borishienkens7251
    @borishienkens7251 6 років тому +4

    I was looking for the Ricardian Model in relation to debt/tax policy but this was really helpful as well!

    • @salmanmosharraf5847
      @salmanmosharraf5847 2 роки тому +3

      i was looking for richardian model but instead i got jojos music theme

  • @everythingismediocre
    @everythingismediocre 2 роки тому

    Brilliant, clear, elegant.
    Liked and subscribed.

  • @ankuragrawal90
    @ankuragrawal90 7 років тому +4

    This is brilliant stuff! Helped me understand this thing in 4:47 mins flat.

  • @blastgoto
    @blastgoto 4 роки тому +4

    Isn’t it comparison advantage not absolute advantage?

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 4 роки тому +1

    Nicely explained.

  • @princealecxandreresuma4561
    @princealecxandreresuma4561 3 роки тому +1

    This was very very helpful, thank you!

  • @Monika007
    @Monika007 5 місяців тому

    thank you for the easy explanation

  • @cassandralperez2668
    @cassandralperez2668 5 місяців тому

    Great Video

  • @trivanannakkarage9893
    @trivanannakkarage9893 6 років тому +2

    Perfect explanation! Thank you very much! It was very helpful!

  • @tengkumunawarchalil3443
    @tengkumunawarchalil3443 4 роки тому +3

    Second explanation seems weird, Germany have comparative advantage for both cars and sausages, say: Germany produce both: total cost : 2000 + 1000 = 3000 Hours, better than USA produce only cars and Germany produce sausage, which cost 3500 hours.

    • @jingwu9420
      @jingwu9420 4 роки тому +1

      In the least 2slides it shows Germany needs 20 h to product 1 unit of car USA needs 25h, how come he said UAS has advantage on this ?

  • @nirnitadasgupta6730
    @nirnitadasgupta6730 6 років тому +2

    Very helpful! Keep up the good work.

  • @arbulonrexhepi
    @arbulonrexhepi 3 роки тому

    Who can help me which one is better suited to explain trade between nations Ricardo's or HO theory and why

  • @History_is_written_by_winners
    @History_is_written_by_winners 6 років тому +43

    That's not a Ricardian model. You just explained Smiths theory of absolute advantage.

  • @ExcelTutorials1
    @ExcelTutorials1 2 роки тому

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @truonghongnhung
    @truonghongnhung 6 років тому +1

    Amazing explanation. Thank you very much. Liked, :x

  • @jerminmathew1670
    @jerminmathew1670 7 років тому +1

    Great work ..

  • @elifbayramogluu
    @elifbayramogluu 3 роки тому

    Very helpfull! Thank you

  • @PakRC
    @PakRC 7 років тому +1

    Very Helpful, Thanks man!

  • @Olav3D
    @Olav3D 7 років тому +1

    I understood, thanks 👍

  • @nipuniprabodini2147
    @nipuniprabodini2147 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much ❤

  • @nglazgow
    @nglazgow 6 років тому +3

    Good content, mate! Why don't you post more?

  • @melathiputri
    @melathiputri 6 років тому +1

    Very helping!

  • @michellecheng750
    @michellecheng750 5 років тому +1

    Thank you!!

  • @michelle8084
    @michelle8084 11 місяців тому

    THANK UUUUUU

  • @DiggingNorway
    @DiggingNorway Рік тому

    However, if Germany produces all the sausages and all the cars, they need only 3000 hours, which is the best solution...

  • @maryam5666
    @maryam5666 3 роки тому

    at 3.20 in the video, isn't the calculation for opportunity cost wrong? Germany should be producing cars and USA sausages.

    • @kayode-oo
      @kayode-oo 3 роки тому

      Why Germany was producing sausage was the essence of the explanation of comparative advantage which means when a country has absolute advantage of the other in the production of the goods in question. I hope that helps

  • @SirAlmightyAllseeinjah718
    @SirAlmightyAllseeinjah718 7 років тому +1

    you the man!

  • @guillaumecify
    @guillaumecify 6 років тому +1

    thanks !

  • @gregbarry5875
    @gregbarry5875 2 роки тому

    I thought the model had to do with the impact of deficit spending on real interest rates !?!?!?

  • @asiqrahmn
    @asiqrahmn 5 років тому +1

    tq

  • @leventinmytown
    @leventinmytown 4 роки тому +4

    lets be honest we all know germany should have a advantage in producing cars. And instead of sausages you could give USA riots or police brutallity. The absolut advantage would be enormous.

  • @adamfalcon7694
    @adamfalcon7694 11 місяців тому +2

    this is german propaganda

  • @davidmohammadi7076
    @davidmohammadi7076 5 років тому +3

    your german accent sucks but i like this video

    • @NilsMueller
      @NilsMueller 4 роки тому +4

      typical american comment

  • @miro6423
    @miro6423 6 років тому +2

    bitte nochmal auf deutsch

    • @miro6423
      @miro6423 6 років тому

      bis morgen früh

    • @Willxdiana
      @Willxdiana 4 роки тому

      bist du deutscher?

  • @MominNz
    @MominNz 6 років тому +1

    this is just supply side and does not take into demand. so the model is a not applicable in the real world. also the examples you have shown are very confusing. you moved from Adam smiths absolute advantage to comparative advantage and moving the figures, it would be better to make a single example. plus this model doesn't tell you anything in reality. the standard trade model is the model applicable only.

    • @TseyiHastiin
      @TseyiHastiin 5 років тому

      Momin Nz You must have skipped the parts in your economics courses that require you to respect the use of models, ceteris paribus, and the assumption of rational human behavior for economic studies. Economic application requires our respective economic qualities and experiences to realize that these economic tools being taught are just starting points for us to use them on this very complicated human behavior discipline.

    • @MominNz
      @MominNz 5 років тому

      Im sure I have not missed any part. The point I'm trying to explain is that these models are not applicable in real life. means they are pretty much useless. from a learning stand point they are fine. In reality the models are very complex its just like e.g you cannot follow 1 economic theory such as mercantilism or capitalism. Thanks.