Specific Factors Model

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @chrisnew1494
    @chrisnew1494 5 років тому +73

    you make much more sense than my econ professor

  • @lr7619
    @lr7619 5 років тому +23

    Thank you! You are a gifted teacher-I finally understand this!

  • @kkkkkkk5726
    @kkkkkkk5726 Рік тому +1

    Love the way you make it so clearly and easy-understanding.

  • @evacowley9515
    @evacowley9515 Місяць тому

    Incredible, you managed to explain more clearly in less than an hour what my professor took two weeks to cover! (And written backwards to boot, legendary)

  • @annakang6941
    @annakang6941 5 років тому +15

    You are helping me survive my semester. Thank you so much

  • @RayemMaulen
    @RayemMaulen 22 дні тому

    Thank god!! You explain things really well!! You say more than my professor of world economy

  • @jessiemayfield6749
    @jessiemayfield6749 14 днів тому

    This was just more confusing and this was the best video UA-cam had, I’m cooked

  • @annaarakelyan5421
    @annaarakelyan5421 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for everything that you do for students! With love from Russian students trying to understand this topics in Geneva!!

  • @zhidanwang6260
    @zhidanwang6260 6 років тому +5

    Such excellent and well-made videos!!!!!

  • @ulquiohime5694
    @ulquiohime5694 4 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much for making these videos!! Life saver

  • @cristina6665
    @cristina6665 6 років тому +5

    I have a test on this tomorrow and this video helped me soooo much god bless you sir

  • @zhangke3566
    @zhangke3566 6 років тому +5

    Thank you very much! Excellent work. I will appreciate it if you could another video talking about Standard Trade Model

  • @adrianbrenescr
    @adrianbrenescr 6 років тому +1

    Excellent video! Congratulations!

  • @brendanpeake4302
    @brendanpeake4302 5 років тому +2

    this video was excellent. thank you for the upload

  • @boburjonyoqubov547
    @boburjonyoqubov547 Рік тому +1

    good explained theoritically, but would be better if you explain with numerical examples, for example how to find Ew or Eq

  • @kamzzee
    @kamzzee 3 роки тому

    Thanks alot. You make this topic so easy to understand. Thanks alot.

  • @user-hilary1213k
    @user-hilary1213k Місяць тому

    You're ambidextrous...that's coool🤩🤩

  • @32459
    @32459 4 роки тому

    very well put together, very logical explanation, thanks!!

  • @chullachakthipphibal7473
    @chullachakthipphibal7473 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much for such an easy-understood explanation!

  • @pandabear4565
    @pandabear4565 3 роки тому

    Glory to you, My good doctor

  • @Mango34562
    @Mango34562 3 роки тому

    Greatest of All Time

  • @timz6198
    @timz6198 5 років тому +3

    just amazing

  • @dharmagyasingh4869
    @dharmagyasingh4869 2 роки тому

    Helped me substantially!!!

  • @oguzhandogan7634
    @oguzhandogan7634 Рік тому

    Love from Istanbul also

  • @dimpalsharma613
    @dimpalsharma613 3 роки тому

    Little bit lengthy... but really useful and knowledge enhancing video👍🇮🇳

  • @gentiankuqica
    @gentiankuqica 5 років тому +4

    Thank you so so much! You're amazing at explaining this.

  • @kanikabagree1084
    @kanikabagree1084 5 років тому +1

    Amazing explanation thankyouuu!

  • @wrednymaz
    @wrednymaz 5 років тому

    Superior stuff. Thank you,

  • @moza9835
    @moza9835 3 роки тому +1

    God bless you

  • @yijingzhang3671
    @yijingzhang3671 5 років тому

    Excellent explanation!

  • @chengchi1728
    @chengchi1728 4 роки тому

    I hope we can have you at UC Berkeley

  • @bilalsherani9960
    @bilalsherani9960 4 роки тому

    Good explanation

  • @halneufmille
    @halneufmille 2 роки тому

    In the last example at 45:30, shouldn't there be an increase in Q_M and L_M as well?

  • @scottval2574
    @scottval2574 4 роки тому

    due to covid 19 and an increase in automation o How will the earning of labour and capital will be affected in the short (sf model) and long run(ho)?

  • @viviancao9536
    @viviancao9536 5 років тому +1

    I hope that we can have you in University of Waterloo

  • @老派青年
    @老派青年 3 роки тому

    You save me thank you so much!

  • @KrDavidLee
    @KrDavidLee 5 років тому +4

    Question: In 38:15, capital is fixed but labor goes up. By definition, MPK has to go down when more laborers are looking to utilize capital. So why does he say that MPK goes up with the coming of more labor? Please help me!!!

    • @numannalbant7739
      @numannalbant7739 5 років тому

      When more labor comes:
      L/K increases and MPL decreases, when inverse is taken:
      K/L decreases and MPK does what? Increases.
      He explains this part at the beginning, around min. 10

    • @mattjordan7817
      @mattjordan7817 3 роки тому

      @@numannalbant7739 When more people occupy the same amount of capital, the MPK must fall. Just think about it

    • @MrFunkyWarrior
      @MrFunkyWarrior Рік тому

      No because capital is fixed so when you introduce all these new labourers production would benefit massively from new capital, thus MPK increases.

    • @MrFunkyWarrior
      @MrFunkyWarrior Рік тому

      MPL decreases since more people occupy same amount of capital@@mattjordan7817

  • @cristianperez5808
    @cristianperez5808 6 років тому

    for the first graph what woudl be the y and x intercepts? that would help me a bunch, thanks great video!

  • @LiebermannFilms
    @LiebermannFilms 5 років тому +1

    excellent video, but I ask myself how do you write mirror-inverted ?

    • @SItgix
      @SItgix 5 років тому

      invert the whole video afterwards

  • @Matheus-fe7dt
    @Matheus-fe7dt 6 років тому

    Lets say i want to apply the specific model to a country running a deficit such as USA. How do I use examples to fit in with this model?

  • @xavijohn5823
    @xavijohn5823 4 роки тому +2

    In 38:31,i think MPK should decrease instead of increase!right?labor increases,MPK decreases

    • @Reonnoer
      @Reonnoer Рік тому

      No, labor increases, MPK increases and r increases. But if labor increase MPL decreases

  • @lessonsarchived8527
    @lessonsarchived8527 2 роки тому

    Thank you.🇧🇩

  • @alperennozcan
    @alperennozcan Рік тому

    He said ''iPod''...We are getting older...

  • @mustafabahbah5114
    @mustafabahbah5114 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much

  • @jamesmettle2
    @jamesmettle2 Рік тому

    🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @gagarine42
    @gagarine42 6 років тому

    Good video. But why not using the derivative of the production function with respect to L for MPL? Those triangles are confusing to me.

  • @godwinkatemi5157
    @godwinkatemi5157 Рік тому

    thanks

  • @chemicalneonm
    @chemicalneonm Рік тому

    Why would the MPK increase when introducing more labor to M? If there is more labor then K is less productive, then the MPK would become smaller. This is on min 37:55

  • @aneeshssundaram1675
    @aneeshssundaram1675 9 місяців тому

    Professor, Aneesh from Singapore here. i am meaning to ask for Part 3 of the lecture, what does "W" in the numerical example represent, and how is it different from the WLm?

  • @anija212
    @anija212 3 роки тому

    At the minute 41:00, you say labor has moved from agriculture to manufacturing, whereas it seems its the contrary...could you please explain?

  • @조은서학부재학식품자
    @조은서학부재학식품자 7 місяців тому

    How the heck are you writing everything backwards??

  • @mattjordan7817
    @mattjordan7817 3 роки тому +2

    9:40 and 38:20 When more and more people occupy the same amount of capital, the MPK must fall. I understand your logic, but it is wrong

  • @sergiodtr
    @sergiodtr Рік тому

    Did someone else noticed that he is ambidextrous?