Oh No, It's Selwyn Froggitt: Gala Performance.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @herbiestrainsbands346
    @herbiestrainsbands346 6 років тому +16

    RIP Bill Maynard - 30/3/18. I know most people associate him with the role of Claude Greengrass form Heartbeat but he will always be Selwyn in my eyes!!!

    • @anjkovo2138
      @anjkovo2138 6 років тому

      Nice sentiments Herbie

    • @Minime163
      @Minime163 2 роки тому +1

      That's the first thing I seen him in when he became greengrass I remembered him from his selwen days

    • @sgrannie9938
      @sgrannie9938 Рік тому +1

      🙋🏼 .... Unanimous 👍

  • @Autopsy6
    @Autopsy6 Рік тому +2

    Magic!

  • @anjkovo2138
    @anjkovo2138 9 місяців тому +2

    MAGIC 👍

  • @abid676767
    @abid676767 11 років тому +5

    Thanking you for the upload.

  • @joannegray5138
    @joannegray5138 9 років тому +6

    Wow, that's brought back some happy memories. I used to love this show when I was little and I've spent nearly half an hour giggling almost non stop. Thank you so much ♥♥

  • @sgrannie9938
    @sgrannie9938 Рік тому +5

    Bill Maynard had the initial idea for the show, wishing to create a sitcom based around the members of the working men's club in his home village of Sapcote, Leicestershire.[3] He later said "every character came from that club".[3] Maynard modelled his lead character on Peter Wright, a larger-than-life patron who often exclaimed "magic!" with his thumbs up and ordered "a pint of cooking and a bag of nuts", both of which would become catchphrases of Maynard's character.[4][5][1] Wright had arms too muscular to fold properly so he kept them high on his chest, another attribute Maynard borrowed.[3] Maynard later commented "you couldn't dream up a character like Selwyn. In fact, I played him down."[6] Additionally, Maynard took inspiration from Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, with Froggitt as Bottom and the committee at the working men's club as the mechanicals.[7][8] Robert Keegan believed Maynard based Selwyn "on himself".[9]
    Maynard considered Froggitt's interest in reading The Times an important part of the character, explaining "I wanted him to be intelligent, always anxious to improve himself. The easy route would've been to use old clichés, like malapropisms and spoonerisms, but that would have made the character too one-dimensional. By getting him to read The Times and be an ardent student of dynamic word power, we gave him the breadth to spread the comedy over a wide range of subjects. We wanted people to laugh with him, not at him".[10] Maynard characterised Froggitt as someone who causes havoc simply due to "his tremendous enthusiasm and his willingness to help his fellow man", rather than "an idiot".[11] He identified "a lot of drama and a certain amount of pathos" in the character.[11]

  • @brianhaskard1042
    @brianhaskard1042 Рік тому +2

    Not sure how the others kept straight faces with Bill on form. lovely Lynda Barron & Megs Jenkins.

  • @clivefuller-hale5073
    @clivefuller-hale5073 10 років тому +5

    Very entertaining...

  • @sgrannie9938
    @sgrannie9938 Рік тому +2

    I wonder how Lynda Baron managed to be in two places (and sizes) at once.

  • @collinhunter9792
    @collinhunter9792 10 років тому +2

    what series is this from? Cos Maurice isn't married . I v watched series 1&2

    • @oldelephantstew
      @oldelephantstew  10 років тому

      See epguides.com/OhNoItsSelwynFroggitt/ This appears to be the 2nd episode of the 3rd series. I can't explain why Maurice appears not to be married.

    • @collinhunter9792
      @collinhunter9792 10 років тому

      oh yes sorry, there is a third

    • @sgrannie9938
      @sgrannie9938 Рік тому +1

      They got married at the end of S2. Selwyn did all the work and paid for everything except the honeymoon.

  • @twenty1forty1
    @twenty1forty1 10 років тому +2

    maurices wife at table @9.35(verea)

  • @whiskeyriver4322
    @whiskeyriver4322 10 років тому +7

    I always considered the writing for this show a bit shallow, and lacking not only depth, but imagination; but the performance of the title character, done with such finesse by Wild Bill, makes up for all the disappointments. It was Maynard alone, that kept me coming back. I can only imagine what Roy Clarke could have done with this............ or, "The Gaffer", which was actually much better as far as writing. The three wanker committee members here, get away with way too much while taking advantage of Selwyn. It would have been much funnier if occasionally their selfish, inconsiderate, and lazy antics, backfired on them. The good guy always gets dumped on here.

    • @sgrannie9938
      @sgrannie9938 Рік тому

      Biggest mistake was the spin-off (sometimes referred to as S4 🙄) that barely survived 8 episodes. Even Maynard couldn’t salvage that shipwreck. S3 ended with a win and should have stayed there.

    • @sgrannie9938
      @sgrannie9938 Рік тому

      Clarke’s characters are often one dimensional. Selwyn is a more complex character.

    • @jonathanwilliamson3512
      @jonathanwilliamson3512 5 місяців тому

      Alan Plater was a brilliant writer.