Max and Min and Second Derivative

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 194

  • @tomscik1965
    @tomscik1965 8 років тому +187

    MIT courses are not about teaching simple things in a complicated way which ordinary ppl do not understand. It is about teaching complicated things in a simple way where ppl get an extra 'dimension' of understanding. THank you Sir for an excellent lecture and thanks to MIT initiative to provide these courses online for rest of the world.

  • @Xu_Explores
    @Xu_Explores 4 роки тому +26

    I got really emotional seeing Professor Strang talk. Seeing a person devoting a lifetime to math and teaching itself is touching and inspiring.

    • @lewis6825
      @lewis6825 Рік тому +3

      I have had the same reaction, actually. Btw he just recently retired at age 88. End of an era.

  • @nishantshankarkhan4879
    @nishantshankarkhan4879 6 років тому +20

    This is called a genius because I don't know about others but this presentation is massive and therefore you are the teacher of MIT.Thanks a lot.

  • @Hiyrustrider
    @Hiyrustrider 11 років тому +6

    This wasn't even part of what I was looking for but I watched the whole thing, I enjoyed this lecture because he's a great Prof.

  • @Venturebits
    @Venturebits 4 роки тому +7

    Amazing how Professor Gilbert can explain the key ideas clearly. He is by far the best teacher I ever had. A lot of the concepts he explain I usually learned them by memory now I can see the big picture.

  • @ajayupy
    @ajayupy 4 роки тому +5

    It's like watching a superhero of calculus at it's best. Thank you, Sir!

  • @sajidalishah2653
    @sajidalishah2653 5 років тому +1

    No Matter what Technology advances, need of such brilliant teachers will always be felt

  • @2fluffybunn
    @2fluffybunn 11 років тому +2

    Holy cow, 38 minutes with you on UA-cam did more good then 2 hours with the book. THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @mayurkulkarni755
    @mayurkulkarni755 7 років тому +34

    34:02 "Drive at a 30 degrees, hope there's a road going that way. Sorry about that point" LOL this guy is genius and funny at the same time :D

  • @zyxwvutsrqponmlk2000
    @zyxwvutsrqponmlk2000 14 років тому +1

    This is a Hats off to the Calculus Master. Durring my engineering this was just a night mare. I now love calculus after viewing the three parts of this vedio series. Thanks to you.
    To increase the reach to remotest areas of the world there are lots of breakages that happen during the sessions. It would be good if these vedios could be available for lower bandwidth connections too.
    A BIG THANK YOU!

  • @saiprakashhadnoor3987
    @saiprakashhadnoor3987 4 роки тому +3

    No words for this man's teaching.Really loved it.

  • @NothingMaster
    @NothingMaster 5 років тому +5

    Strange truly deserves a Medal of Honor of sorts for his monumental contributions to the advancement and dissemination of mathematical knowledge and intuitions in these MIT series. The Internet has created a whole new and accessible dimension of learning not available to the previous generations of students.

  • @saisaske1
    @saisaske1 4 роки тому

    The maxima of "like" function for this video is infinte. This video kept on giving me "aww" moments. Thankyou sir. I always wondered why we need to take the derivative of x and assign to 0. I will always be indebted to you.

  • @ingeborgsvensson4896
    @ingeborgsvensson4896 6 років тому +3

    I wish I had had a teacher like Strang in high school. The example of the way to drive to MIT are great ways to explain why you would use these derivatives in real life. Great course! Thank you.

  • @zyxwvutsrqponmlk2000
    @zyxwvutsrqponmlk2000 14 років тому

    This is a Hats off to the Calculus Master. Durring my engineering this was just a night mare. I now love calculus. Thanks to you.
    To increase the reach to remotest areas of the world there are lots of breakages that happen during the sessions. It would be good if these vedios could be available for lower bandwidth connections too.
    A BIG THANK YOU!

  • @aryaanpetiwalla2655
    @aryaanpetiwalla2655 3 роки тому +1

    I saw concave and convex curves, and thought this lecture might be too difficult for me. Then, he explained it so easily and well, and I’m very satisfied having watched this. Thanks a lot!

  • @LuisMunozCompScience
    @LuisMunozCompScience 13 років тому +4

    Thanks. One of the most simple, and brilliant explanations regarding this subject.

  • @silkieshag9703
    @silkieshag9703 6 років тому +3

    excellent explanation, you could be in a regular university, but you could watch classes from the best teachers in the world. Thanks MIT

  • @Zwide97122
    @Zwide97122 Рік тому

    Doing my masters in Econ Science and I still come to watch these intuition classes by Prof Gilbert.
    Legendary!

  • @nemanihanumantharao7439
    @nemanihanumantharao7439 6 років тому +2

    the greatest calculus teacher in the whole wide world

  • @maelena14
    @maelena14 13 років тому +5

    God bless you Mr. Strang!! Thank you very much for your efforts...
    I am taking a second look at calculus as I prepare for graduate school and your videos have been most helpful! Thank you!!!!!!!

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 3 роки тому +1

    DR. Strang thank you for another excellent lecture on classical selection of max and min problems in calculus.

  • @nashabusmani3220
    @nashabusmani3220 5 років тому +1

    Most beautiful way to define double derivative test. Hats off to you sir.

  • @ninomatcharashvili9739
    @ninomatcharashvili9739 6 років тому +9

    I have been studying from you sir the main topics in calculus, thank you!

  • @zarsblackhorse123
    @zarsblackhorse123 6 років тому +3

    I never thought i could finish this 38mins video lecture. but once i started to watch its really hard to close the video. Thank you for this excellent lecture Sir and also thanks to MIT for this initiative.

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 3 роки тому

    MIT OpenCourseWare
    Max and Min and Second Derivative
    'Professor Strang
    Chapters.
    The Second Derivative: The derivative of the derivative.
    Subtitles: Jimmy Ren.'
    2:10 min ... acceleration
    2:56 min ... Newton's Law, F = ma

  • @TheFirstBK
    @TheFirstBK 11 років тому +2

    Thank you very much Dr. Strang, wish I had you back when I took calculus.

  • @KarlSmithByrne
    @KarlSmithByrne 13 років тому +1

    'If I knew where we were (22:58) mathematics would even more useful than it is...which would be hard to do!' This guy is fantastic.

  • @abdalrahmanshaddow6121
    @abdalrahmanshaddow6121 4 роки тому +3

    this man play beautiful mathematical music ,
    the exact definition of deep learning

  • @vinodsah8330
    @vinodsah8330 4 роки тому +1

    What a teaching style

  • @Tzvetkov
    @Tzvetkov 7 років тому +22

    "And there's a sign of hope. It started bending up."

  • @solvability2782
    @solvability2782 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you, professor. This is amazingly clear.

  • @laldinpuiarenthlei7615
    @laldinpuiarenthlei7615 8 років тому +36

    hats off for gilbert strang

  • @FordBurden
    @FordBurden 12 років тому

    Thank you! I am doing a condensed 8 week course that is kicking my ass and this is making it all "tangible"!

  • @micahbrill
    @micahbrill 11 років тому +1

    I really enjoy your videos. You're helping me through my Business Calculus class at Brockport College this semester.

  • @laurenmarzlock3419
    @laurenmarzlock3419 7 років тому +1

    I love calculus, It is great exercise for the brain. I love the logic and the patterns.

  • @Oneeightseven6
    @Oneeightseven6 6 років тому +1

    This man, has explained this very well!! Thank you for this video!!

  • @renaeneufeld
    @renaeneufeld 8 років тому +2

    Thank you for this video!! Very well done. I understand soooo much better.

  • @thebaniyabox8147
    @thebaniyabox8147 12 років тому

    if i could afford the mit's fees i definitely would have been a part of that institute which is the best in the world.

  • @ankushpatil9039
    @ankushpatil9039 6 років тому

    I can't resist to myself to watch these explanations.

  • @skoolwal3874
    @skoolwal3874 9 років тому +1

    Excellence and hard work personified!!

  • @shibsankarbera9218
    @shibsankarbera9218 8 років тому

    nice lecture ...really I highly influenced ....because of its simplicity and graphical interpretation......

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 7 місяців тому

    The first and second derivative as combination of zero positive and negative bending as it oscillstes between convex and concave planes differentiated by that an be applied in digital communication developed by Nyquist further developed by shannon where the basic first and second derivative as otherwise may be a function of basic digital functions. Inspired by MIT course offered by this professor.
    Sankaravelayudhan Nandakumar

  • @MISERSTYLE
    @MISERSTYLE 11 років тому

    This guy is an amazing teacher.

  • @arjunch2755
    @arjunch2755 5 років тому

    this videos are enough for gate exam without practice,i love this lectures

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 6 місяців тому

    The triangulated surface in modili form is derived at in between maxima and minima around the point of inflection in between with increase in frequency of transition as applicable entropy equation in understanding the hydrogen attraction and repulsion in boson gas as a function of interactive magneticfield over electricfield as Hall's interpretation. A definition on electron gap in between atom and nucleus could be arrived at the interpretation of first derivative and sevond derivative based on the sign of the sevond derivative
    Sankarabrlayudhan Nandakumar.

  • @sanjeevmadan2610
    @sanjeevmadan2610 4 роки тому

    Many thanks, you are excellent, so simple so clear

  • @mj6637
    @mj6637 7 років тому +1

    Great work, Professor!

  • @Amine-gz7gq
    @Amine-gz7gq 5 місяців тому

    This video/topic is important to understand the Laplacian in multivariable calculus

  • @mohfa1806
    @mohfa1806 8 років тому +1

    Sorry i should have watched the last 40 seconds to know the answer to my silly question now :)..the answer is there....great video and wonderful lecturer

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 2 роки тому

    The oscillation becoming bending down convex and bending down a concave with inflexion point at which the sign of bending oscillate between concave and convex producing positive and negative energy.

  • @Khwartz
    @Khwartz 8 років тому

    Really Very Nice Smooth Teaching :)
    Btw, been French, looks to me that the French name for calculus is way much meaningful as it is "analyse" (analysis), which is about "cutting in (little) peaces" etymologically, which goes very well imho with the concepts of "dx" and "dy" :)

  • @zensorrow1
    @zensorrow1 12 років тому +25

    "Why move myself 20 miles to MIT when I can, with a click of the mouse, move not 20 inches and absorb the same knowledge."
    ~The wise musings of an unemployed student drowning in debt

  • @AndyThomasStaff
    @AndyThomasStaff 7 років тому +3

    I'm having trouble understanding the word problem at 26:27. I don't understand *why* the fastest time is where the first derivative of the graph is zero. What is the actual graph, and why does the derivative of zero (where the first graph's slope is zero?) mean the fastest time when solving the equation?

    • @faliakuna8162
      @faliakuna8162 7 років тому +4

      It is because the function "time it takes to arrive at work" reaches either a min or a max point when its first derivative is equal to zero. We don't know what its graph looks like, but we do know that its value must reach a min or max when its derivative is zero. So when the value of this function is minimum, the time it takes to arrive at work is minimum, because it is what the value of this function represent, the time it takes to arrive at work.

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis7268 4 роки тому

    Very nice explanation.superb.minutest of minutest study is knowledge.h ow?how?every thing is from mind.Mind is full of equation.while going to bed you must shake your head violently then only equations shall fall down you will get sleep.

  • @Doug19752533
    @Doug19752533 8 років тому

    Prof Strang is COOL! love the videos

  • @alias40anon
    @alias40anon 6 років тому

    Very good point to point explanation

  • @PabstOut
    @PabstOut 12 років тому

    divide x on both sides (3x^2)/x=(2x)/x,
    then simplify to get 3x=2,
    then divide each side by three to solve for x, x=2/3

  • @kglayyet
    @kglayyet 12 років тому

    Thank you so much for uploading these courses..

  • @lauras.9757
    @lauras.9757 6 років тому

    Great lecture Prof - thank you!
    Thanks MIT!!
    I love me some ♡Calculus♡

    • @lauras.9757
      @lauras.9757 6 років тому +1

      I have now attended Walter Lewin's Physicd class, Susskind at Stanford and Yale Physics and now Mathematics at MIT!
      I am thrilled to learn from the greatest lecturers/ professors of the day - this is an opportunity I would not have otherwise and it means everything to me. I've learned so much!
      My sincerest gratitude to you all for these lessons.

  • @Joe11Blue
    @Joe11Blue 8 років тому +5

    The good Dr. needs to switch to de-caf. Excellent presentation.

  • @HypnotizeCampPosse
    @HypnotizeCampPosse 11 років тому

    No kidding, it looks like the biggest problem with getting a good professor is getting one that's not arrogant, presents the facts in a logical way and the best professors will incidentally get you to use the best practices without even having to stress it.

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 6 місяців тому

    The conflection points becomes the square comfogurstoon points pave the way for basic figitsl numbers while denfing the pulses in between zeros and ones in signal sending in computstionsl digitsal mathematics.

  • @LAnonHubbard
    @LAnonHubbard 13 років тому +1

    Thanks Professor Strang.

    • @user-qj4zr1pj9y
      @user-qj4zr1pj9y 2 роки тому +1

      Do you stil remember what you have learned from these lectures ? 😄

    • @newbarker523
      @newbarker523 2 роки тому

      @@user-qj4zr1pj9y Hi. I was the original poster (though have a different account now). Yes, I still remember what the lectures taught me. Probably because I have found it useful in my job. Maths (I'm from UK) is awesome!

    • @user-qj4zr1pj9y
      @user-qj4zr1pj9y 2 роки тому +1

      @@newbarker523 Good for you !! Yaa Maths is awesome when you learn from Gilbert.!!

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 2 роки тому

    The combustion graph follow a sin and cos curve follow maximum and minimum.

  • @nandakumarcheiro
    @nandakumarcheiro 2 роки тому

    Thus maxima and minima points with combustion inflexions follow a sine curve and cos curve.

  • @jrmom4u
    @jrmom4u 6 років тому

    Appreciated with impressive lecture!

  • @RHOLAMOUALID
    @RHOLAMOUALID 8 років тому +3

    while looking for the min time, you use the deriv=0, but that applies for both the min and the max, why assume that what you found was the min and not the max, without using the second deriv, or by studying the monotony of the function ???

    • @mohfa1806
      @mohfa1806 8 років тому +3

      the lecturer in the last 40-50 seconds explain this point ......he explained that he should have calculated the second derivative at this point to show that the second derivative is positive , and hence its bending upward at this point , so its a minimum.....please watch the last minute of the lecture....regards

  • @FallenSparrowNz
    @FallenSparrowNz 11 років тому

    you can only do that if the formula for the equation is in the form ax^2 +bx = 0
    in this form we can presume that one anwer has to be zero, and it is simple algebra to find out the second number. You would have not seen this very often because most equations we work with are in the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 this c value muddles it up and means you can not do what he did.

  • @erikandresgarciavillarroel3005
    @erikandresgarciavillarroel3005 6 років тому

    Thanks a lot for sharing your knowledge!

  • @horizonbrave1533
    @horizonbrave1533 5 років тому

    @ 8:56 spoken like a true Mathematician!

  • @choungyoungjae8271
    @choungyoungjae8271 7 років тому

    thanks for graphical explanation.

  • @neilchakr
    @neilchakr 4 роки тому +1

    how. do. you. explain. so. well.

  • @surajyergude
    @surajyergude 5 років тому +1

    Will you help me how did you get to the 30 degrees?

  • @narasimharaotogata9301
    @narasimharaotogata9301 3 роки тому

    🙏 మీరు చేస్తున్న సేవకు ధన్యవాదములు🙏

  • @pettyjames7
    @pettyjames7 9 років тому

    Thank you, great job explaining.

  • @phillipmaina8801
    @phillipmaina8801 8 років тому +3

    When differentiating for the second time your found the two roots as 2/3 and 0. I understand how you got 2/3 but a bit shaky on how you got 0 without the graph. A bit of help would be nice...

    • @iloveselenafan
      @iloveselenafan 8 років тому +4

      if your talking about the 3x^2-2x if you factor it you can pull out a 'x' and a '3x-2' and if you solve for x for both of them you get 0 for 'x' and you get 2/3 for '3x-2'

    • @phillipmaina8801
      @phillipmaina8801 8 років тому

      Thank you so much 🙏

  • @MsManoodle
    @MsManoodle 10 років тому +2

    this guy is great!

  • @JanBuatim
    @JanBuatim 14 років тому

    i could say the same as zik667, my teacher had a post doctor at a french institution at math teaching and still hadnot that good didactics. MIT rules, i wish i could study over there. Im brazilian and i have my engineer course at UFSC - Santa Catarina Brazil

  • @lowersaxon
    @lowersaxon 5 років тому

    First class teacher.

  • @AnkushSingh-kj1zl
    @AnkushSingh-kj1zl 6 років тому

    Nice lecture 👍👍👍

  • @chancewatkins5071
    @chancewatkins5071 8 років тому +1

    Love this, I've subscribed. Thanks for sharing; Jesus Christ Bless

  • @andreranulfo-dev8607
    @andreranulfo-dev8607 5 місяців тому

    Pure gold!

  • @btsock
    @btsock 2 роки тому

    Great example, but If the b was to be smaller than x then there should be an "absolute value sign" on the right side, because one cannot lessen the time by driving backwards, right?🙂 But this wouldn't matter since it always take longer to overshoot and drive back.

  • @ghanshyammishra5297
    @ghanshyammishra5297 7 років тому

    best explanation

  • @jayadrathas169
    @jayadrathas169 9 років тому

    Good one bruh..was a bit skeptic at first due to,too much fidgeting of yours...but the last problem was cool

  • @qzorn4440
    @qzorn4440 7 років тому

    what's up doc? a very relaxing informative lecture. thanks. B+)

  • @karamwahba1591
    @karamwahba1591 6 років тому

    If i'm looking for minimum time, then why to set first derivative of time function to zero?
    Why not setting time function itself directly to zero?
    Why deferentiation is required ?

    • @wbaumschlager
      @wbaumschlager 6 років тому +2

      Reason #1: The time function itself is never zero. You will always need some time > 0 to drive from Home to MIT, no matter which way you choose.
      Reason #2: You are not looking for the point where time is zero. You are looking for the point where time is minimum.

    • @karamwahba1591
      @karamwahba1591 6 років тому +2

      @@wbaumschlager great 👍, zero time means stay at home no need to drive.

  • @akshayv2849
    @akshayv2849 4 роки тому

    What's the name of this wonderful teacher

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  4 роки тому

      Gilbert Strang

  • @mohfa1806
    @mohfa1806 8 років тому

    Thank you for this video......just a question , in the end problem why we assume that the answer is the minimum time and not the max time?.....any suggestions?

  • @donaldmaase776
    @donaldmaase776 10 років тому +9

    Interesting he talks about inflection point in the US economy in 2010 and thinks we might be turning around (as an example).......it has now happened...........:-)

    • @lauras.9757
      @lauras.9757 6 років тому +1

      Check out the Elliot Wave Theory to see some beautiful market behaviour analysis and predictions. Calculus, fractals, wave theory... sexy stuff. :)

  • @tyrokell1
    @tyrokell1 11 років тому

    you are brilliant! thanks a lot mate

  • @jollyjokress3852
    @jollyjokress3852 7 років тому +1

    Can someone please tell me why the rule of derivative is valid? Why is x^2 always 2x and x^3 always 3x^2 ... derived??? THX!

    • @ohaRega
      @ohaRega 7 років тому

      It was originally arrived at using limits. You can probably find the proof (which is quite simple actually) in any introduction to derivatives lecture.

    • @d.q.p6182
      @d.q.p6182 6 років тому

      Jolly Jokress its called the "power rule"! (1st) you take the exponent(power) down from its position, and multiply it times whatever coefficient and/or variable that is there already.
      (2nd) you reduce what the original exponent was by 1-whole integer, to get what the new exponent(power) will be.
      Power Rule formula: nx^n-1
      ex: x^2 derivative= 2x^1 or 2x
      ex: x^3 derivative= 3x^2
      ex: x^1/2 derivative= 1/2x^-1/2
      hint: [1- (1/2)= -1/2]
      ex: 12x^3 = 36x^2
      ex: 2x^5 = 10x^4
      and that's the basis of the "Power Rule" used when necessary in calculus differentiation😊😊😊😊

    • @saisameer5842
      @saisameer5842 6 років тому

      U can use first principle to get d answer...

    • @GodzillaGoesGaga
      @GodzillaGoesGaga 6 років тому

      You should read up on infinitesimals. This it the cornerstone of derivatives and calculus. Newton discovered it and used ‘h’ whereas Leibnitz used ‘delta’ and published it. there’s a whole history there which is fascinating too. However it is very simple in principle and worth reading as it will clear up how this whole derivative thing works.

    • @GodzillaGoesGaga
      @GodzillaGoesGaga 6 років тому

      Look here.... tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/DefnOfDerivative.aspx

  • @chrisudell543
    @chrisudell543 6 років тому

    Brilliant lecture! One question, I can't figure out why a/sqrt3 = 30 degrees. On the unit circle, cosx of 30 is sqrt3/2, and sine of 30 degrees is 1/2. Anybody?

    • @wbaumschlager
      @wbaumschlager 6 років тому +1

      a = cos 30
      x = sin 30
      x = a / sqrt 3
      -----------------
      sin 30 = cos 30 / sqrt 3
      Note that as he said this holds only for a speed ratio of 2/1 which is build in and hidden in sqrt 3. Actually it's x = a / sqrt( (60/30)^2 -1). He lost that somewhere during the process.

  • @Hanzalayt-yn5vo
    @Hanzalayt-yn5vo 2 місяці тому

    Wowwwww!!
    Great 👍👌👍👌👍👌👍👌👍

  • @SydiusVideo
    @SydiusVideo Рік тому

    Thank You!

  • @JohnM...
    @JohnM... 8 років тому +1

    what about the 3rd derivative test?....(used specifically when 2nd derivative is zero, giving no clue as to gradient and concavity - as you MAY or MAY NOT have an inflection pt. when f''=0 e.g. straight line). Cool thing about that test is that when the modulus of it >0, we have an inflection point (rising if > 0, falling if

  • @D0g63rt
    @D0g63rt 12 років тому

    That's true everywhere except when x=0 so you have to be careful doing that.

  • @Daski69
    @Daski69 12 років тому

    How did the professor see that x=2/3 at 17:30?
    obviously one of the possible solutions is that x=0 but how did he see that the second solution was 2/3 without factoring or using the quadratic formula?

  • @kaventhwe
    @kaventhwe 11 років тому

    this stuff helps thanks