10:04 Rayaan says he doesn't make the claim that all of the Companions are trustworthy and not all Sunnis believe that. Brothers and sisters, this is the same JAAHIL that was calling Shamsi a Madkhalee, and saying Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhalee & Saudi Arabia are Munafiqeen. Yet, he opposes the Aqeeda of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama'ah by saying this BAATIL statement. And ontop of that, sitting down, laughing and joking with people who CURSE the Prophets wife and Companions who Allah has praised. Yet at the same time, called Saudi Arabia Munafiqeen for giving a gift to a non-Muslim. And came to Shamsi with a HARSH attitude. What a joke!
Then someone else come and insist on shemrani like if he is the only ''sunni'' who can represent them, you don't have anyone else who is not full of hate?. Are you that weak? It's annoying how you hold on to one person, you have plenty who you admire in speaker cornor so choose someone else and convince them to debate. Blade runner said he don't like debating those who proven to be hateful. So freaking pick someone else and stop acting like shemrani is something, he is not, we don't watch him in hyde park so why should we care now? -.-
No I think you misunderstand bro. What I heard is that Shemrani wasn't debated because he is a "nobody". All due respect to this Sunni brother who went to defend the Religion of Allah but I think even he will admit that in terms of Shi'ism, he (along with most of us) is not on Shemranis level. Which is why I'm confused that this Sunni brother was met up with and debated... do you get how strange this seems to everyone bro? Not trying to cause conflict
Pray 4 Paradise Look brother, i don't know the guy in the video. I wasn't as excited to watch the video. I wish if someone we know would debate/discuss blade runner but they didn't come forward so this is better than nothing. But when it comes to shermani, watch the last video in titan tv. Blade runner said shermani works on a youtube channel who hate shia to death and he don't debate those who spread such hateful message. He was just making fun of the fact that shermani is not known to SC SO HE MADE A JOKE "WHO IS HE." But the real reason was shamrani working on hatful channel and tv show.
Where is part 2Literally that Sunni brother had good intentions however many suuni brothers don't understand the history or are brainwashed this is the result of being ignorant. They need to ask a question What stops you from finding the truth?
How peaceful the discussion is. Hope the shia and sunni can continue to have a fruitful discussion in a lively atmosphere. And those who stand in the way of friendship between Sunni and Shia must be condemned.
Wahhabis/Salafis/Sunnis, stop saying speaking ill or cursing Sahaba is dangerous...rather praising, loving, idolizing killers and usurpers of Ahlul Bayt (S) is dangerous and jeopardizes one's salvation and standing in the hereafter.
Abu Ibrahim lmao 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️. I’ve seen this happen in real life as well. Never a direct Arabic reference.. only google and their own books which they rate more than the Quran 🙄
if you say to a Shia why do you diss the mother of the believers they say we don't but then look it up on UA-cam Shia videos of they leaders doing just that dissing over 1000s of videos
Why do you people rely on someone like shamsi who refuse to debate any shia yet you claim he destroy shia concept, what's that logic?. You only fooling your self. Shamsi is scared to debate , at least be quite, you won't look stupid showing off using someone who don't dare to debate..
I would like to give an answer to this blunt blade. In the verse in which Allah promises believing Men and Women paradise it actually does mean all of them, but blade runner excludes those who are not good, that's because they do not fulfil the requirements of Imaan. But when it comes to Muhaajireen and Ansaar their requirements are nothing more then Hijra and Nusra. So when Hijra and Nusra are found in a person then the reward is also found. Now what you have to remember is that lying,cheating, drinking, adultery, fornication etc brings deficiency in a persons Imaan but NOT inside a person's Hijra or Nusra. So their is NO PONIT bringing up things what Muhaajireen and Ansaar did to take them out of the verse of Hijra and Nusra because it STILL does not take them out of Hijra and Nusra.
The attempt to blame Abdullah Ibn Ubayy & his followers for all the hypocrisy is weak sauce. Indeed the surah Muddathir was revealed prior to Badr and is a makki surah yet there is a verse pointing toward those with disease in their heart. Moreover in the beginning of Surah Baqarah there are those mentioned who have disease in their heart and in reality are arrogant fools calling the true believers fools.
According to Sunni scholars, Muslims of the past should be considered companions if they had any contact with Muhammad, and they were not liars or opposed to him and his teachings. If they saw him, heard him, or were in his presence even briefly, they are companions. All companions are assumed to be just (udul) unless they are proven otherwise; that is, Sunni scholars do not believe that companions would lie or fabricate hadith unless they are proven liars, untrustworthy or opposed to Islam.[10] "Whom God is pleased with" (Arabic: رضي الله عنه raḍiyu l-Lāhu ‘anhu) is usually mentioned by Sunnis after the names of the Sahaba.
The thing is no matter what us Shias say or how many times we say it, a stubborn Sunni will never accept the words. All they will do is deny deny deny even if it is so clear. How can people be so blind
I love this, it's so funny. The Sunni brother is making up shit as he goes along :D He says the sunni scholars are liars and he thinks he knows more than sunni scholars. I love it so much :D
Sunis opened up and destroyed again it’s strange when you actually listen to a shia talk he makes sense and it just sounds more righteous and with a pure heart Sorry al sunnah I think deep down even you know there’s major questions to be asked
Lol he repeats its your scholar your scholar who says this and the shia brother gets accused of having a warp history Lool it’s your own suni history the problem is you haven’t read your own hadiths and you follow scholars who let’s face it aint the brightest the truth is very clear and you my friend 100 per cent ain’t on it
i like the way they're debating..both of them are giving each other time and space to answer and question ,not like shamsi wahabi who just keeps talking and doesn't let anyone talk
The guy with his face blurred, is this the Kharaji that debated Shamsi and called him a Madkhali? He was rebelling against the rulers and cursing some major scholars whilst he himself didn't even know some of the most BASIC things in the religion (such as the conditions before Salah) and now he thinks hes Sheikh Ul-Islam getting cosy with this Shi'i blade runner to give him an aqeedah lesson? This guy is cursing our Mother Ai'shah and your calling him akhi? Allahu Musta'an learn your Religion...
Hassan Shemrani will be the best to debate the blade runner. Not some random teenager with all due respect. Come on I want these guys to debate Hassan Shemrani!
Regarding { Quran 9::100 } Why don't people read and analyse whether or not this verse is talking about ALL 'companions' or not. Two parts: 1. "FIRST FORERUNNERS AMONG" This is very specific. 2. "and those who followed them with GOOD CONDUCT" This is also very specific. For those who quote this verse and say this refers to ALL companions stop your deception. Your next step is to objectively find out who this verse is refering too. Otherwise you are going to have to accept someone like Abdulrehman ibn Udays who was a 'companion' who pledged allegiance under the tree. He later went on to participate in the victory of Egypt, became the General of the army that ATTACKED Uthman. 'Companion' Attacking 'Companion'.
aaaaaaa1 Holy Quran 3:195 ------------------ فَاسْتَجَابَ لَهُمْ رَبُّهُمْ أَنِّي لَا أُضِيعُ عَمَلَ عَامِلٍ مِنْكُمْ مِنْ ذَكَرٍ أَوْ أُنْثَىٰ ۖ بَعْضُكُمْ مِنْ بَعْضٍ ۖ فَالَّذِينَ هَاجَرُوا وَأُخْرِجُوا مِنْ دِيَارِهِمْ وَأُوذُوا فِي سَبِيلِي وَقَاتَلُوا وَقُتِلُوا لَأُكَفِّرَنَّ عَنْهُمْ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ وَلَأُدْخِلَنَّهُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ ثَوَابًا مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ ۗ وَاللَّهُ عِنْدَهُ حُسْنُ الثَّوَابِ And their Lord responded to them, "Never will I allow to be lost the work of [any] worker among you, whether male or female; you are of one another. So those who emigrated or were evicted from their homes or were harmed in My cause or fought or were killed - I will surely remove from them their misdeeds, and I will surely admit them to gardens beneath which rivers flow as reward from Allah, and Allah has with Him the best reward." There are so many verses about the companions that they are in paradise. Can you bring me 1 verse were it says that the imaams are in paradise! Otherwise i wont respond. So give me your tafseer of thus verse and bring a single aya of the quran wich says your imaams are in paradise.
How do you "shias" take Islam and all it's perfection and alter it's words to fit your deceiving narrative? The Prophet SAW warned us of minority sects within Islam claiming to be true Islam, he said to follow the Jama3ah, the Majority, Sunni is Islam. May Allah guide you all.
We will not judge the sahaba this is for allah and his prophet.... we will love them for the sake of allah snd the prophet. The shia should stop trying to find mistakes in sahabas all the time... and should try to correct themselves... Non of us are perfect sunni or shia or any other sect... so we should be trying to improve ourselves. Oh and also the shia should stop disrespecting our mother its really very offensive... the prophets wives are all the best of all women and no other woman can reach their status. They are the mothers of the believers... so just stop disrespecting them
If shia are kaffir then why is the brother sitting next to the blade. Krsone my friend what you gotta say about that. Please don't have a heart attack.
Fatality first ov all... rafida is the ones who rejected... the sahaba are the ones who rejected mola ali (a.s) as their khalipha... at ghadeer they all congratulated him, but at saqifa they all rejected him... hence u guys being the rafida! but we are proud of being the shia of ali (a.s)
😂😂 ua-cam.com/video/LUMVLoXrABk/v-deo.html That “Sunni”guy is same guy who talked to brother Shamsi and he was making takfir on the Muslim leaders. And insulting Shaykh Rabee Al Madkhali.
in Shiaism's authoritative texts we find them promoting the continuation of prophetic qualities after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) under the disguise of belief in 12 infallible imams. Baqir Majlisi, one of the most prominent Shia scholars, writes: "We learn from some narrations from the imams that the status of imamah is above the status of Prophethood." (Hayat al-Qulub, v.3, pg.31) The Shia revolutionist of recent times, Khomeini, writes: "It is from the fundamentals of our religion to believe that our imams have a status which no exalted Angel or Messenger can reach." (Al-Hukumat al-Islamiyyah, pg.52) Shias attribute the status of the prophets to their imams. In some affairs they have even attributed a status to their imams that is beyond prophets. For example, Shias believe the imams are rulers of the universe and owners of this world and the hereafter, and hence free to legislate as they wish therein. They have the authority to make things halal and haram as they desire. They believe imams grant whatever they desire to whoever they desire and they deprive whosoever they desire. (See Usul Al-Kafi, Kitab al-Hujjah-the Shia equivalent of Sahih Al-Bukhari. Shias consider Usul Al-Kafi a reliable book. Its author is Thiqat al-Islam Muhamad Ibn Yaqoob Al-Kulayni who Shias considere to be a highly reliable Scholar, died: 328 AH. Shia scholars believe Usul Al-Kafi was presented to their legendary 12th hidden imam who liked it and said: “It suffices for our Shias”. Therefore, questioning the authenticity of the narrations, content and chains of transmission in this book is directly opposing the 12th imam. Surely, if it contained fabricated narrations or any of the narrators were problematic the Shia 12th imam would have corrected this before authenticating it, as according to the Shias the imams have knowledge of whatever occurred in the past and whatever will happen in the future, and nothing is concealed from them.) Usul Al-Kafi contains a chapter entitled "imams possess knowledge of past, present and future, and nothing is concealed from them." In the same book Sayyiduna Ali radhiyallahu anhu has been reported to have said: "I have been given qualities which nobody before was given, even prophets. I have complete knowledge of deaths, calamities and lineages. Things which are distant are not hidden from me." (Usul Al-Kafi, v.19, pg.197) Sayyid Ni'matullah Al-Jazairi, a well-known Shia scholar, writes: "Our scholars differ on the virtue of imam 'Ali and the other holy imams over all the prophets besides Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Some scholars suggest that imams are more virtuous than all of the prophets besides the high ranking resolute (ulu al-'azm) prophets. Other scholars suggest they are equal in rank to prophets. The majority of later scholars opine that imams are higher in rank than all prophets, and this is the correct opinion. (Al-Anwar Al-Nu'maniyyah) Usul Al-Kafi, in the chapter entitled imamah is Promised from Allah, also states: "imamah is a status granted by Allah which some chosen personalities attain. No imam has the right to deprive the succeeding imam from this rank by granting it to someone else." Shias believe Sayyiduna 'Ali radhiyallahu anhu is the first imam appointed by Allah and believing in him as an imam is as necessary as believing in the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).(Awail al-maqalat pg.48). The famous Shia scholar Mufid writes: "All Ithna Ashariyah Shias (twelvers) agree that the Prophet (SAW) appointed the Leader of the Believers, 'Ali alaihis salam, to succeed him. Thus, one who rejects his imamah has rejected a fundamental of faith." (Awa'il al-Maqalat pg.48) According to Shia creed all Muslims who have believed in the caliphate of Sayyiduna Abu bakr radhiyallahu anhu have not only rejected a fundamental belief of religion (ie. imamah), rather they have rejected prophethood because rejecting the imamah of Ali alaihis salam is equal to rejecting prophethood." (I'tiqadat Al-Saduq, taken from Muqaddamah Al-Burhan pg.19) Shah Waliyyullah rahimahullah states: “Ithna Ashariya (twelvers) believe that their imams are infallible and obedience to them is compulsory. [They believe] imams receive discreet revelation (wahy khafi). Thus, in reality Shias deny Khatme Nubuwwat, although they apparently call the Prophet (SAW) 'Seal of the Prophets'. (Tafhimat Ilahiyyah, pg.244) Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani rahimahullah writes: "All Rafidhi (Shia) sects unanimously believe that imams are specifically chosen by Allah and that they are infallible from making errors and mistakes. [They believe] imams have complete worldly and religious knowledge of past and present to the extent that they even know the exact number of pebbles, raindrops and leaves on trees." (Ghunyah al-Talibeen, pg.156-157) Mawlana Yusuf Ludhyanwi rahimahullah writes: “The doctrine of imamah is a conspiracy against the eternity and finality of Islam. (Differences in the Ummah and the Straight Path) Mawlana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri rahimahullah writes: "Shias believe that the Angel would descend upon Sayyiduna 'Ali radhiyallahu anhu and that he has the authority to change Islamic laws by making whatever he wishes halal or haram. Hence, although Shias claim to believe in Khatme Nubuwwat but in reality they do not believe in it." (Mitraqat al- Karamah, pg.77) Mawlana Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi also states that every Shia believes their 12 imams are greater than the prophets. All Muslims agree that whoever claims a non-prophet is greater than a prophet then such a person is a kafir. It is clear that considering the imams of Ahl alBayt to be greater than prophets is blasphemy against prophethood. (Radd Al-Rafadhah pg.12) Shaykh Ihsan Ilahi zahir also mentions how Shias have rejected Khatme Nubuwwat by claiming their imams would receive revelations from Angels greater than Jibra'il and Mika'il alaihimassalam and by declaring their imams to be better than prophets. (Al-Shi'a wa alSunnah, pg.72) We'd like to end by posing a question to the Ithna Ashariya (Twelver Shias) who make up approximately 90% of the world's Shias: Question: Imamah is a fundamental belief of Shiaism. Shias believe one who denies imamah becomes a disbeliever. However, in the Quran Allah has mentioned the prophets, and angels, books and various other articles of faith. The Quran and Sunnah contain a mention of every aspect of religion; even various animals are mentioned in the Quran in various contexts. Where in the Quran or authentic narrations does it state that after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) we should believe in, follow and obey 12 imams (namely imam 'Ali, imam Hasan, imam Husayn, imam Zayn-al-'Abidin, imam 'Ali Rida, imam Muhammad Baqir, imam Ja'far Sadiq, imam Musa Kazim, imam Muhammad Taqi, imam Muhammad Naqi, imam Hasan 'Askari and imam Muhammad Mahdi) who: 1. Are infallible 2. Have knowledge of the unseen 3. Know and choose their time of death 4. Receive wahi from Allah? 5. The earth belongs to 6. Know whatever occurred in the past and whatever will happen in the future, and nothing is be concealed from them (as is mentioned in Usul Al-Kafi)?
these guys both are not qualified for this discussion, literally went around 1 point for 20 mins with no progression. These guys should not be here doing this.
The defence of Sahaba no matter what they did has corrupted these people. For Allah's sake, stand with the truth. Sahaba were humans to the core. They could have committed mistakes. Not all Sahaba but many must have done one thing or the other. Don't try to defend the indefensible.
Him and all the Ahlus-Sunnah seemed to be more worried about being able to finish their SAWW after the name of the Prophet - has anyone else noticed that?
REFUTATION OF SHIA BLADERUNNER. Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I wish I could meet my brothers.” The Prophet’s companions said, “Are we not your brothers?” The Prophet said, “You are my companions, but my brothers are those who have faith in me although they never saw me.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 12169 Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani This talks about us, the brothers of prophet Muhammed pbuh, a person is a brother who has faith in and follows Muhammed pbuh, and has not seen him. A companion is someone who has faith and followed Muhammed pbuh during the prophets time. So the hypocrites are obviously not people who have faith nor follow Muhammed pbuh, therefore the hypocrites are not companions.
Abbas aboud again, a companion is someone who has faith and followed the messenger. If someone didn't follow the messenger, or lost faith, they are not among the companions. That hadith shows that the prophet thought that they are companions, but some lost faith, and did follow the messenger therefore they fall out of the fold or being a companion.
Abbas aboud no, the sunni perspective of the companions is the ones who seen the prophet, and had faith and followed the messenger. Companion = someone who seen the prophet, and had faith in him and followed him. Brother = someone who did not see the prophet yet he has faith, and follows the messenger pbuh.
Ibn Abd Al Barr was an alleged Zahiri. Even a kafir would take the trouble to look into the background of the person he quotes or refers to. The shia shaitan neways refers to a Zahiri deviator.
If you are men debate shermani and expose him than wallahi you would do more good than you think. If you expose shemrani or defeat or refute him wallahi I will make it my duty to first become shia and convey the message. This is what your suppose to be doing. But no u debate people with no knowledge just to get your shia to lime you more and hate sunni more. Your duty as a Muslim is to confront people of knowledge like shermani and refute them to convince Sunnis to be open minded but running away from the learned Sunnis clearly shows your agenda
It was good to see him come and have a discussion but that guy didn't look like he was there to get asnwers, he was literally saying "I am not gonna agree with that", without even waiting to listen to what zain was going to say
brother honestly tell me with heart if certain shias just start making videos and asking for debate would you guys go and debate with him. Lol you guys say you don't debate ahlay biddah aka blade runner, yet you have no problem debating other shias like that isa guy. There is a thing called credentials. Shias have debated a lot of people but who's this shemrani guy, i haven't even watched his video yet. You need to have credentials with you. You cant just debate everyone who calls you out without them having some credentials. I have seen shias debate far more knowledgeable people. Who's this guy
It is really pointless to debate such person, If some of you think shamsi won even though he don't want to debate they would do the same for shemrani even before debating let alone after debating so what's the point of debating such hateful person? You are a prove of this, you already decided that shemrani destroyed shia so be happy with your victory and be quite.. Silly..
This young guy is talking nonsense man. What the hell is he on about? Making a fool of himself, wallahi he should stop saying he speaks for Ahlus Sunnah.
Ali is flig encect. what yes. Ali is cowerd lets his wife get hit and he don't do enthing.What yes in your book's. Kafi.comi.coleni. tonsi. Is cowerd din. din imamia👹... Sunne love❤❤ ali rlho. And de Koran karim❤❤. And stop lie.and stop with dis faith of hate.
Jamal Suri: lol..how dumb are you? I asked if you gonna take up Aky Hussain's challenge. Can you even read or are you one of those Ali Dawah type followers?
WHO ARE THE 12 IMAMS / CALIPHS IN SUNNI ISLAAM? Well here is your answer my friend. They are: THE RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPHS: 1. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Abu Bakr as-Sideeq 2. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Umar ibn Khattaab al-Faarooq 3. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Uthman ibn Affaan Dhun-Noorayn 4. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Abul Hassan Ali ibn Abee Taalib 5. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Hassan ibn Alee ibn Abee Taalib Radhiallaahu Anhum wa Alayhimusalaam Ajma3een. 6. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Mu'aawiyah R.A. (Sahaabi)(Ummayad) 7. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Abdullah ibn Zubayr R.A. (Sahaabi) 8. Khaleef Abdul Malik al-Marwaan 9. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Umar ibn Abdil Azeez Rahimahullah (Ummayad) 10. Khaleef Hishaam ibn Abdul Malik 11. Caliph al-Mansuur (Abbasid) 12. Caliph Haroon ar-Rasheed (Abbasid) There are many other Caliphs who are good candidates to be part of the 12 Imaams. Examples include some of the Abbaasid and Ottoman Caliphs and other Caliphs like Sultaan Salaahudeen Ayoobee. 12. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Muhammad ibn Abdullah al-Mahdi We as Ahlus Sunnah believe the twelfth and last of the 12 Imaams will be Imaam Mahdi.
muslim palbuu Yes, the history of munafiqs!? Most of these people fought, killed, or imprisoned the ahlulbayt, and yet these Sunnis claim to love Ali as.
muslim palbuu Anyone who opposes Ali is a munafiq. Three armies fought him. They are all munafiqs. Many hadiths support this. Hassan made a truce with muawiya, similar to hudaybia. Did the prophet give baya to the kuffar? Then shut it.
muslim palbuu Imama and being part of ahlulbayt are two different. Hadith Al Kisa and ayat at tathir make clear who the blessed ahlulbayt are. Point two stinks to high water. A central point of divine influence is non intervention. Allah can produce miracles and make everyone a mumin, but why doesn't he? As for third there is no contention. Every Shia believes the Quran is complete. 17000 verses includes the explanation of the prophet which is also revelation.
Anyone who betrayed the Prophet sawas is not considered a Sahaba. They are Munafiq. This concept of which Sahaba was a Munafiq is an oxymoron and a fallacy. Shia are wrong here.
Rafida will always be cowards. They were the ones who fled Hussain and let him die. Rafida = rejectors. How ironic that it was the "rejectors" that abandoned Hussain and let him die.
10:04 Rayaan says he doesn't make the claim that all of the Companions are trustworthy and not all Sunnis believe that.
Brothers and sisters, this is the same JAAHIL that was calling Shamsi a Madkhalee, and saying Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhalee & Saudi Arabia are Munafiqeen. Yet, he opposes the Aqeeda of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jama'ah by saying this BAATIL statement.
And ontop of that, sitting down, laughing and joking with people who CURSE the Prophets wife and Companions who Allah has praised.
Yet at the same time, called Saudi Arabia Munafiqeen for giving a gift to a non-Muslim. And came to Shamsi with a HARSH attitude.
What a joke!
Wait I'm confused... Why didn't they meet Shemrani?
Pray 4 Paradise bladerunner and co were roadrunners
Then someone else come and insist on shemrani like if he is the only ''sunni'' who can represent them, you don't have anyone else who is not full of hate?. Are you that weak?
It's annoying how you hold on to one person, you have plenty who you admire in speaker cornor so choose someone else and convince them to debate. Blade runner said he don't like debating those who proven to be hateful. So freaking pick someone else and stop acting like shemrani is something, he is not, we don't watch him in hyde park so why should we care now? -.-
No I think you misunderstand bro. What I heard is that Shemrani wasn't debated because he is a "nobody". All due respect to this Sunni brother who went to defend the Religion of Allah but I think even he will admit that in terms of Shi'ism, he (along with most of us) is not on Shemranis level.
Which is why I'm confused that this Sunni brother was met up with and debated... do you get how strange this seems to everyone bro? Not trying to cause conflict
Pray 4 Paradise thats a good a valid point. I guess this mysterious sunni is the most knowledgeable person in uk 😂
Pray 4 Paradise Look brother, i don't know the guy in the video. I wasn't as excited to watch the video. I wish if someone we know would debate/discuss blade runner but they didn't come forward so this is better than nothing. But when it comes to shermani, watch the last video in titan tv. Blade runner said shermani works on a youtube channel who hate shia to death and he don't debate those who spread such hateful message.
He was just making fun of the fact that shermani is not known to SC SO HE MADE A JOKE "WHO IS HE." But the real reason was shamrani working on hatful channel and tv show.
Where is part 2Literally that Sunni brother had good intentions however many suuni brothers don't understand the history or are brainwashed this is the result of being ignorant.
They need to ask a question What stops you from finding the truth?
How peaceful the discussion is. Hope the shia and sunni can continue to have a fruitful discussion in a lively atmosphere. And those who stand in the way of friendship between Sunni and Shia must be condemned.
Wahhabis/Salafis/Sunnis, stop saying speaking ill or cursing Sahaba is dangerous...rather praising, loving, idolizing killers and usurpers of Ahlul Bayt (S) is dangerous and jeopardizes one's salvation and standing in the hereafter.
majorpremise
Allah praised the sahaba u zindeeq
Come with Part 2 Man!!!
Sunni argument destroyed very calmly..
Debate brother shamrani. You guys are showing up the Shia community
muslim palbuu yes my brother... still exposing shia?
KrsOne Yeah, brother, by the help of Allah!!!
may allah reward you brother
strong students of shaykh google mashallah.
Abu Ibrahim wallahi 😂😂😂😂😂
they were literally googling the whole vid blatantly lol. "let me rebut your claim from every angle bro" *then types furiously in google*
Abu Ibrahim lmao 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️. I’ve seen this happen in real life as well. Never a direct Arabic reference.. only google and their own books which they rate more than the Quran 🙄
Allahu musta'an
What happend to part 2 it disappeared
How quick the road runner forgot when shamsi made him dizzy and needed a 10 minute break
is this the young brother from the dawah man team? the light skin brother i mean
Respect to the brother for trying, he did trap the shiite at points. Debate brother shemrani! No more excuses and stop running away!
if you say to a Shia why do you diss the mother of the believers they say we don't but then look it up on UA-cam Shia videos of they leaders doing just that dissing over 1000s of videos
How long we will have to wait for part 2?
Where is the second part please?
When I see a Shia video, the first thing I do is to go to the comments section to see so many lies
Lol one man is more than enough to destroy the shi'a concept... Shamsi
ServantOfTheKing Shamsi? You are full of yourself bro. Humble yourself.
Itachi Uchiha humble yourself and comment elsewhere in sha Allah...
ServantOfTheKing I can comment where I want. Humble yourself
Itachi Uchiha humble yourself by blocking yourself...
Why do you people rely on someone like shamsi who refuse to debate any shia yet you claim he destroy shia concept, what's that logic?. You only fooling your self. Shamsi is scared to debate , at least be quite, you won't look stupid showing off using someone who don't dare to debate..
Freaking part 2 bro. 2 weeks waiting :
I would like to give an answer to this blunt blade. In the verse in which Allah promises believing Men and Women paradise it actually does mean all of them, but blade runner excludes those who are not good, that's because they do not fulfil the requirements of Imaan. But when it comes to Muhaajireen and Ansaar their requirements are nothing more then Hijra and Nusra. So when Hijra and Nusra are found in a person then the reward is also found. Now what you have to remember is that lying,cheating, drinking, adultery, fornication etc brings deficiency in a persons Imaan but NOT inside a person's Hijra or Nusra. So their is NO PONIT bringing up things what Muhaajireen and Ansaar did to take them out of the verse of Hijra and Nusra because it STILL does not take them out of Hijra and Nusra.
The attempt to blame Abdullah Ibn Ubayy & his followers for all the hypocrisy is weak sauce.
Indeed the surah Muddathir was revealed prior to Badr and is a makki surah yet there is a verse pointing toward those with disease in their heart.
Moreover in the beginning of Surah Baqarah there are those mentioned who have disease in their heart and in reality are arrogant fools calling the true believers fools.
According to Sunni scholars, Muslims of the past should be considered companions if they had any contact with Muhammad, and they were not liars or opposed to him and his teachings. If they saw him, heard him, or were in his presence even briefly, they are companions. All companions are assumed to be just (udul) unless they are proven otherwise; that is, Sunni scholars do not believe that companions would lie or fabricate hadith unless they are proven liars, untrustworthy or opposed to Islam.[10] "Whom God is pleased with" (Arabic: رضي الله عنه raḍiyu l-Lāhu ‘anhu) is usually mentioned by Sunnis after the names of the Sahaba.
Where is part 2 really want to watch
Blackdunya may Allah SWT curse you if you are intentionally withholding part 2. Why on earth have you not posted it yet????
The thing is no matter what us Shias say or how many times we say it, a stubborn Sunni will never accept the words. All they will do is deny deny deny even if it is so clear. How can people be so blind
I love this, it's so funny. The Sunni brother is making up shit as he goes along :D
He says the sunni scholars are liars and he thinks he knows more than sunni scholars. I love it so much :D
no offence there debating with a kid ...debate with Shermani
u clearly didnt watch the video since they both agreed it's not a debate. I took this as a simple discussion. Why cant u ?
Mr T I love the way you speak. It is so AHLESUNNAHWALJAMAH like. Absolutely on point. These are the manners of your religion. Keep it up bro
Itachi Uchiha very bad mannered we know where they get it from😂😂😂
8:06
The sunnah brother....
I heard his trousers rip.....
I think he let one rip........
Sunis opened up and destroyed again it’s strange when you actually listen to a shia talk he makes sense and it just sounds more righteous and with a pure heart Sorry al sunnah I think deep down even you know there’s major questions to be asked
Anonymous lol he barks like a dog and doesn’t let anyone talk b cause he knows Shia’s will destroy
show me where he gives clarity in any debate
Lol he repeats its your scholar your scholar who says this and the shia brother gets accused of having a warp history Lool it’s your own suni history the problem is you haven’t read your own hadiths and you follow scholars who let’s face it aint the brightest the truth is very clear and you my friend 100 per cent ain’t on it
Ali Asad Shia have nothing, you give attributes of Allah to the twelve imams. major kuffer.
i like the way they're debating..both of them are giving each other time and space to answer and question ,not like shamsi wahabi who just keeps talking and doesn't let anyone talk
Nice work Zain and the other Shia brothers !
You shocked that sunni lol.
Debate shemrani.
The guy with his face blurred, is this the Kharaji that debated Shamsi and called him a Madkhali? He was rebelling against the rulers and cursing some major scholars whilst he himself didn't even know some of the most BASIC things in the religion (such as the conditions before Salah) and now he thinks hes Sheikh Ul-Islam getting cosy with this Shi'i blade runner to give him an aqeedah lesson? This guy is cursing our Mother Ai'shah and your calling him akhi? Allahu Musta'an learn your Religion...
Big up blackdunya
blackdunya, you should have arranged this discussion between Hasan Shemrani and the shia, instead of this brother
wheres part 2
Hassan Shemrani will be the best to debate the blade runner. Not some random teenager with all due respect. Come on I want these guys to debate Hassan Shemrani!
Oh i don't understand why the other brother is hiding his face... he should be proud of himself. Defending his belief
Wher all of Ali’s Shi’a at that time just?...NO because they rebelled against him and declared him a kafir
Regarding { Quran 9::100 }
Why don't people read and analyse whether or not this verse is talking about ALL 'companions' or not. Two parts:
1. "FIRST FORERUNNERS AMONG" This is very specific.
2. "and those who followed them with GOOD CONDUCT" This is also very specific.
For those who quote this verse and say this refers to ALL companions stop your deception.
Your next step is to objectively find out who this verse is refering too.
Otherwise you are going to have to accept someone like Abdulrehman ibn Udays who was a 'companion' who pledged allegiance under the tree. He later went on to participate in the victory of Egypt, became the General of the army that ATTACKED Uthman.
'Companion' Attacking 'Companion'.
aaaaaaa1 Holy Quran 3:195
------------------
فَاسْتَجَابَ لَهُمْ رَبُّهُمْ أَنِّي لَا أُضِيعُ عَمَلَ عَامِلٍ مِنْكُمْ مِنْ ذَكَرٍ أَوْ أُنْثَىٰ ۖ بَعْضُكُمْ مِنْ بَعْضٍ ۖ فَالَّذِينَ هَاجَرُوا وَأُخْرِجُوا مِنْ دِيَارِهِمْ وَأُوذُوا فِي سَبِيلِي وَقَاتَلُوا وَقُتِلُوا لَأُكَفِّرَنَّ عَنْهُمْ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ وَلَأُدْخِلَنَّهُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ ثَوَابًا مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ ۗ وَاللَّهُ عِنْدَهُ حُسْنُ الثَّوَابِ
And their Lord responded to them, "Never will I allow to be lost the work of [any] worker among you, whether male or female; you are of one another. So those who emigrated or were evicted from their homes or were harmed in My cause or fought or were killed - I will surely remove from them their misdeeds, and I will surely admit them to gardens beneath which rivers flow as reward from Allah, and Allah has with Him the best reward."
There are so many verses about the companions that they are in paradise.
Can you bring me 1 verse were it says that the imaams are in paradise! Otherwise i wont respond.
So give me your tafseer of thus verse and bring a single aya of the quran wich says your imaams are in paradise.
How do you "shias" take Islam and all it's perfection and alter it's words to fit your deceiving narrative? The Prophet SAW warned us of minority sects within Islam claiming to be true Islam, he said to follow the Jama3ah, the Majority, Sunni is Islam. May Allah guide you all.
The takfeeri Bakri Sunni was obliterated.
this are Google students of no Knowledge ,shia Aint Muslims simple no need for debate
Literally roleplay. They must have did terrible in their GCSE drama classes. Poor acting.
We will not judge the sahaba this is for allah and his prophet.... we will love them for the sake of allah snd the prophet. The shia should stop trying to find mistakes in sahabas all the time... and should try to correct themselves...
Non of us are perfect sunni or shia or any other sect... so we should be trying to improve ourselves.
Oh and also the shia should stop disrespecting our mother its really very offensive... the prophets wives are all the best of all women and no other woman can reach their status. They are the mothers of the believers... so just stop disrespecting them
If shia are kaffir then why is the brother sitting next to the blade. Krsone my friend what you gotta say about that. Please don't have a heart attack.
muslim palbuu then my friend you may also be one.
salifs don't debate with shias not all sunnis
Fatality first ov all... rafida is the ones who rejected...
the sahaba are the ones who rejected mola ali (a.s) as their khalipha... at ghadeer they all congratulated him, but at saqifa they all rejected him... hence u guys being the rafida! but we are proud of being the shia of ali (a.s)
😂😂 ua-cam.com/video/LUMVLoXrABk/v-deo.html
That “Sunni”guy is same guy who talked to brother Shamsi and he was making takfir on the Muslim leaders. And insulting Shaykh Rabee Al Madkhali.
Look at how he is laughing and gets comfortable with the people who defame and attribute lies to Sahaba(RA) and A’isha bint Abu Bakr(RA).
Where is part 2?
in Shiaism's authoritative texts we find them promoting the continuation of prophetic qualities after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) under the disguise of belief in 12 infallible imams.
Baqir Majlisi, one of the most prominent Shia scholars, writes: "We learn from some narrations from the imams that the status of imamah is above the status of Prophethood." (Hayat al-Qulub, v.3, pg.31)
The Shia revolutionist of recent times, Khomeini, writes: "It is from the fundamentals of our religion to believe that our imams have a status which no exalted Angel or Messenger can reach." (Al-Hukumat al-Islamiyyah, pg.52)
Shias attribute the status of the prophets to their imams. In some affairs they have even attributed a status to their imams that is beyond prophets. For example, Shias believe the imams are rulers of the universe and owners of this world and the hereafter, and hence free to legislate as they wish therein. They have the authority to make things halal and haram as they desire. They believe imams grant whatever they desire to whoever they desire and they deprive whosoever they desire. (See Usul Al-Kafi, Kitab al-Hujjah-the Shia equivalent of Sahih Al-Bukhari. Shias consider Usul Al-Kafi a reliable book. Its author is Thiqat al-Islam Muhamad Ibn Yaqoob Al-Kulayni who Shias considere to be a highly reliable Scholar, died: 328 AH. Shia scholars believe Usul Al-Kafi was presented to their legendary 12th hidden imam who liked it and said: “It suffices for our Shias”. Therefore, questioning the authenticity of the narrations, content and chains of transmission in this book is directly opposing the 12th imam. Surely, if it contained fabricated narrations or any of the narrators were problematic the Shia 12th imam would have corrected this before authenticating it, as according to the Shias the imams have knowledge of whatever occurred in the past and whatever will happen in the future, and nothing is concealed from them.)
Usul Al-Kafi contains a chapter entitled "imams possess knowledge of past, present and future, and nothing is concealed from them."
In the same book Sayyiduna Ali radhiyallahu anhu has been reported to have said: "I have been given qualities which nobody before was given, even prophets. I have complete knowledge of deaths, calamities and lineages. Things which are distant are not hidden from me." (Usul Al-Kafi, v.19, pg.197)
Sayyid Ni'matullah Al-Jazairi, a well-known Shia scholar, writes: "Our scholars differ on the virtue of imam 'Ali and the other holy imams over all the prophets besides Prophet Muhammad (SAW). Some scholars suggest that imams are more virtuous than all of the prophets besides the high ranking resolute (ulu al-'azm) prophets. Other scholars suggest they are equal in rank to prophets. The majority of later scholars opine that imams are higher in rank than all prophets, and this is the correct opinion. (Al-Anwar Al-Nu'maniyyah)
Usul Al-Kafi, in the chapter entitled imamah is Promised from Allah, also states: "imamah is a status granted by Allah which some chosen personalities attain. No imam has the right to deprive the succeeding imam from this rank by granting it to someone else."
Shias believe Sayyiduna 'Ali radhiyallahu anhu is the first imam appointed by Allah and believing in him as an imam is as necessary as believing in the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).(Awail al-maqalat pg.48).
The famous Shia scholar Mufid writes: "All Ithna Ashariyah Shias (twelvers) agree that the Prophet (SAW) appointed the Leader of the Believers, 'Ali alaihis salam, to succeed him. Thus, one who rejects his imamah has rejected a fundamental of faith." (Awa'il al-Maqalat pg.48)
According to Shia creed all Muslims who have believed in the caliphate of Sayyiduna Abu bakr radhiyallahu anhu have not only rejected a fundamental belief of religion (ie. imamah), rather they have rejected prophethood because rejecting the imamah of Ali alaihis salam is equal to rejecting prophethood." (I'tiqadat Al-Saduq, taken from Muqaddamah Al-Burhan pg.19)
Shah Waliyyullah rahimahullah states: “Ithna Ashariya (twelvers) believe that their imams are infallible and obedience to them is compulsory. [They believe] imams receive discreet revelation (wahy khafi). Thus, in reality Shias deny Khatme Nubuwwat, although they apparently call the Prophet (SAW) 'Seal of the Prophets'. (Tafhimat Ilahiyyah, pg.244)
Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani rahimahullah writes: "All Rafidhi (Shia) sects unanimously believe that imams are specifically chosen by Allah and that they are infallible from making errors and mistakes. [They believe] imams have complete worldly and religious knowledge of past and present to the extent that they even know the exact number of pebbles, raindrops and leaves on trees." (Ghunyah al-Talibeen, pg.156-157)
Mawlana Yusuf Ludhyanwi rahimahullah writes: “The doctrine of imamah is a conspiracy against the eternity and finality of Islam. (Differences in the Ummah and the Straight Path)
Mawlana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri rahimahullah writes: "Shias believe that the Angel would descend upon Sayyiduna 'Ali radhiyallahu anhu and that he has the authority to change Islamic laws by making whatever he wishes halal or haram. Hence, although Shias claim to believe in Khatme Nubuwwat but in reality they do not believe in it." (Mitraqat al- Karamah, pg.77)
Mawlana Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi also states that every Shia believes their 12 imams are greater than the prophets. All Muslims agree that whoever claims a non-prophet is greater than a prophet then such a person is a kafir. It is clear that considering the imams of Ahl alBayt to be greater than prophets is blasphemy against prophethood. (Radd Al-Rafadhah pg.12)
Shaykh Ihsan Ilahi zahir also mentions how Shias have rejected Khatme Nubuwwat by claiming their imams would receive revelations from Angels greater than Jibra'il and Mika'il alaihimassalam and by declaring their imams to be better than prophets. (Al-Shi'a wa alSunnah, pg.72)
We'd like to end by posing a question to the Ithna Ashariya (Twelver Shias) who make up approximately 90% of the world's Shias:
Question: Imamah is a fundamental belief of Shiaism. Shias believe one who denies imamah becomes a disbeliever. However, in the Quran Allah has mentioned the prophets, and angels, books and various other articles of faith. The Quran and Sunnah contain a mention of every aspect of religion; even various animals are mentioned in the Quran in various contexts. Where in the Quran or authentic narrations does it state that after Prophet Muhammad (SAW) we should believe in, follow and obey 12 imams (namely imam 'Ali, imam Hasan, imam Husayn, imam Zayn-al-'Abidin, imam 'Ali Rida, imam Muhammad Baqir, imam Ja'far Sadiq, imam Musa Kazim, imam Muhammad Taqi, imam Muhammad Naqi, imam Hasan 'Askari and imam Muhammad Mahdi) who:
1. Are infallible
2. Have knowledge of the unseen 3. Know and choose their time of death
4. Receive wahi from Allah?
5. The earth belongs to
6. Know whatever occurred in the past and whatever will happen in the future, and nothing is be concealed from them (as is mentioned in Usul Al-Kafi)?
these guys both are not qualified for this discussion, literally went around 1 point for 20 mins with no progression. These guys should not be here doing this.
0:30 - What's with his right??
The defence of Sahaba no matter what they did has corrupted these people. For Allah's sake, stand with the truth. Sahaba were humans to the core. They could have committed mistakes. Not all Sahaba but many must have done one thing or the other. Don't try to defend the indefensible.
This is jokes towards the end , blade runner cracks me up when he catches him out
Love watching it and seeing it takes this young brother a long pause to find another excuse after been given so much damn logical evidence.
Rose Thedon what evidence?
OhhGrav | Um Kraazy
Salam, if you could watch the video again and try to understand. It'll answer your question along with some research. Jazakallah
Debate shemrani
I Wanna know what happend to the shia blade runner after the challenge. Clearly in occultation with his 12th fake imam
Sab Do are you mad, why are you speaking about the 12th imam like that. This is the grandson of the prophet pbh. This isn't like you bro.
Sab Do lahowla wala quwatt, saying fake imam is asking for the anger of the holy prophet pbh.
Naz Shah you are aware the 12th imam is a fake! He doesnt exist
Sab Do this is not true
KrsOne we believe in the same mahdi. You just choose to deny it. Because you hate shia so much.
Lol they're discussing with Rayan..this man is a joke and this whole discussion is a joke
Him and all the Ahlus-Sunnah seemed to be more worried about being able to finish their SAWW after the name of the Prophet - has anyone else noticed that?
Its called respect?
An individual who accepted Islam and met the Prophet PBUH then practices and died on Islam is a Companion ... end off
Is the Sunni brother iamstrydes???
REFUTATION OF SHIA BLADERUNNER.
Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I wish I could meet my brothers.” The Prophet’s companions said, “Are we not your brothers?” The Prophet said, “You are my companions, but my brothers are those who have faith in me although they never saw me.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 12169
Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani
This talks about us, the brothers of prophet Muhammed pbuh, a person is a brother who has faith in and follows Muhammed pbuh, and has not seen him. A companion is someone who has faith and followed Muhammed pbuh during the prophets time. So the hypocrites are obviously not people who have faith nor follow Muhammed pbuh, therefore the hypocrites are not companions.
Abbas aboud again, a companion is someone who has faith and followed the messenger. If someone didn't follow the messenger, or lost faith, they are not among the companions. That hadith shows that the prophet thought that they are companions, but some lost faith, and did follow the messenger therefore they fall out of the fold or being a companion.
Abbas aboud no, the sunni perspective of the companions is the ones who seen the prophet, and had faith and followed the messenger.
Companion = someone who seen the prophet, and had faith in him and followed him.
Brother = someone who did not see the prophet yet he has faith, and follows the messenger pbuh.
Ibn Abd Al Barr was an alleged Zahiri. Even a kafir would take the trouble to look into the background of the person he quotes or refers to. The shia shaitan neways refers to a Zahiri deviator.
Please Shia brother, debate with someone more intelligent in the field. Someone like brother hijab
If you are men debate shermani and expose him than wallahi you would do more good than you think. If you expose shemrani or defeat or refute him wallahi I will make it my duty to first become shia and convey the message. This is what your suppose to be doing. But no u debate people with no knowledge just to get your shia to lime you more and hate sunni more. Your duty as a Muslim is to confront people of knowledge like shermani and refute them to convince Sunnis to be open minded but running away from the learned Sunnis clearly shows your agenda
Sam Moses, is Shamsi considered learned?
Abbas aboud who exposed him or defeated him
Black dunya look two Muslim brothers sitting next to one another. Exactly how it should be.
Naz Shah no ☺
Mr T according to you
Sab Do what no
Naz Shah i dont consider bladerunner a muslim
Sab Do that's your view alone.
I see why they don’t wanna debate the known good Sunni speakers, they’re sly and they would get caught out
The Sunni brother started off with good manners with the blade.
It was good to see him come and have a discussion but that guy didn't look like he was there to get asnwers, he was literally saying "I am not gonna agree with that", without even waiting to listen to what zain was going to say
brother honestly tell me with heart if certain shias just start making videos and asking for debate would you guys go and debate with him. Lol you guys say you don't debate ahlay biddah aka blade runner, yet you have no problem debating other shias like that isa guy. There is a thing called credentials. Shias have debated a lot of people but who's this shemrani guy, i haven't even watched his video yet. You need to have credentials with you. You cant just debate everyone who calls you out without them having some credentials. I have seen shias debate far more knowledgeable people. Who's this guy
ok brother be at peace :3
It is really pointless to debate such person, If some of you think shamsi won even though he don't want to debate they would do the same for shemrani even before debating let alone after debating so what's the point of debating such hateful person? You are a prove of this, you already decided that shemrani destroyed shia so be happy with your victory and be quite.. Silly..
Shocking the Sunni doesn't have a clue.
blunt blades need to debate with the sharp sword of Allah swt, aka shamran
i pity the fools MrT
This young guy is talking nonsense man. What the hell is he on about? Making a fool of himself, wallahi he should stop saying he speaks for Ahlus Sunnah.
The sunni guy dont know nothing
Zaffar Mahmood, None of them do...
Hasnein Rajani Do u know
This Sunni guy is fake, Shia pagans bought him to role play lol because they can’t debate real Sunnis.
Shia=Taqqiya
Literally roleplay. They must have did terrible in their GCSE drama classes. Poor acting.
Blackdunya can u pls come infront of the camera one day pls. I want to spot u bro. Thanx for the gr8t work.
yo we see his face
Imam google strikes again.
Ali is flig encect. what yes. Ali is cowerd lets his wife get hit and he don't do enthing.What yes in your book's. Kafi.comi.coleni. tonsi. Is cowerd din. din imamia👹... Sunne love❤❤ ali rlho. And de Koran karim❤❤. And stop lie.and stop with dis faith of hate.
Shia blade runner only speaking the truth!!
Yes brederin my brother the blade and the razor looking sharp as always.
Mashallah shia is always right
All sunnis do is make excuses. This breh is a typical excuse maker.
No point of debating dogs like Shermani and Shamsi because all they do is bark over your conversation.
Aky Hussain
yeah, you cowards debate kids who blur their faces and don't know imam Suyuti. Mushrik clowns you are.
You wahabbis must be the chosen ones then if we are mushriks. Followers of Abu Sufiyan and the breed of Yazid
Jamal Suri: you going to take up Aky Hussain's challenge/request?
Jamal Suri: lol..how dumb are you? I asked if you gonna take up Aky Hussain's challenge. Can you even read or are you one of those Ali Dawah type followers?
This guy ain’t got a clue
Subhanallah even though I dislike this takfiri rehan
A groupe of jouhala speaking about the religion of Allah
Shia destroyed by a young boy
WHO ARE THE 12 IMAMS / CALIPHS IN SUNNI ISLAAM?
Well here is your answer my friend.
They are:
THE RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPHS:
1. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Abu Bakr as-Sideeq
2. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Umar ibn Khattaab al-Faarooq
3. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Uthman ibn Affaan Dhun-Noorayn
4. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Abul Hassan Ali ibn Abee Taalib
5. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Hassan ibn Alee ibn Abee Taalib
Radhiallaahu Anhum wa Alayhimusalaam Ajma3een.
6. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Mu'aawiyah R.A. (Sahaabi)(Ummayad)
7. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Abdullah ibn Zubayr R.A. (Sahaabi)
8. Khaleef Abdul Malik al-Marwaan
9. Sayyidunaa Khaleef Umar ibn Abdil Azeez Rahimahullah (Ummayad)
10. Khaleef Hishaam ibn Abdul Malik
11. Caliph al-Mansuur (Abbasid)
12. Caliph Haroon ar-Rasheed (Abbasid)
There are many other Caliphs who are good candidates to be part of the 12 Imaams. Examples include some of the Abbaasid and Ottoman Caliphs and other Caliphs like Sultaan Salaahudeen Ayoobee.
12. Imaam wa Khaleefatul Muslimeen Sayyidunaa Muhammad ibn Abdullah al-Mahdi
We as Ahlus Sunnah believe the twelfth and last of the 12 Imaams will be Imaam Mahdi.
AIRLINERS WEB and I will ask you again, according to who?
muslim palbuu Yes, the history of munafiqs!?
Most of these people fought, killed, or imprisoned the ahlulbayt, and yet these Sunnis claim to love Ali as.
AIRLINERS WEB rubbish
muslim palbuu Anyone who opposes Ali is a munafiq. Three armies fought him. They are all munafiqs. Many hadiths support this.
Hassan made a truce with muawiya, similar to hudaybia.
Did the prophet give baya to the kuffar? Then shut it.
muslim palbuu Imama and being part of ahlulbayt are two different. Hadith Al Kisa and ayat at tathir make clear who the blessed ahlulbayt are.
Point two stinks to high water. A central point of divine influence is non intervention. Allah can produce miracles and make everyone a mumin, but why doesn't he?
As for third there is no contention. Every Shia believes the Quran is complete. 17000 verses includes the explanation of the prophet which is also revelation.
So much for the hiding his face Mashallah lol
blackdunya all day
I wonder what they had for dinner
33:15 : Triggered
blade runner 😂
Shemrani
Anyone who betrayed the Prophet sawas is not considered a Sahaba. They are Munafiq. This concept of which Sahaba was a Munafiq is an oxymoron and a fallacy. Shia are wrong here.
This "sunni" is jaahil
fake
Taqqqqqqqqqiiiiiiiyyyyyyaaaaa
confused sunni boy :D
ikaz I can see why they don’t want to debate Shemrani lmao
Or fake Sunni
Rafida will always be cowards. They were the ones who fled Hussain and let him die. Rafida = rejectors. How ironic that it was the "rejectors" that abandoned Hussain and let him die.
LIke how Shimrani ran away from Sheikh Hassan Allahyari? Indeed he followed the SUNNAH OF UMAR (LA) and RAN from the battle just like Uhud days.
Where is part 2????