Händel - Passacaglia in G minor (HWV 432)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
- If you would like to be notified about upcoming uploads, subscribe to my channel and click on the notification bell.
Thanks for watching!
Georg Friedrich Händel (1685 - 1759)
Passacaglia from Suite No. 7 in G minor (HWV 432)
Severin Brast, piano
November 2020
MIDIVisualizer by kosua20: github.com/kos...
Recorded on a Roland FP-90
![[Baroque ornamentation and improvisation] G. F. Händel - Passacaille in G Minor - HWV 432](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2HynpKOlESU/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Baroque ornamentation and improvisation] G. F. Händel - Passacaille in G Minor - HWV 432](/img/tr.png)
I always wanted to listen to this piece in a piano. It's beautiful. Thank you for playing.
Glad you liked ittt :)
Wow!!!!!!! I enjoyed every second of your performance. Thank you so much
Thank YOU so much for your heartwarming comment! 😊
I love the tempo you have chosen to play. You have brought out all the nuances and hidden melodys that run secretly through his wonderful composition. Thank you!
Glad you liked my interpretation, thank you for watching :)
Okay, this is one of the best videos with this masteroiece, which i've seen in last 2 years. Thank you:)
Wow, thank you so much! Glad you liked it.
Controlling the Dynamics of your left hand is phenomenal ❤
Thanksss, appreciate it :)
You deserve more views. Amazing!
Thank you so much, Andrei!
My favourite piece. Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it!
BRAVO, I love the song Passacaglia in G minor Hmv 32, and the way you perform it so smooth, it is so comfortable and soothing to hear it.
Thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed my rendition :)
Except that it’s NOT a song. I don’t hear anyone singing, do you? It’s a PASSACAGLIA. If Handel had someone singing he would have called it a song, but he didn’t. He called it a PASSACAGLIA.
@@pauldavies5611 There doesn't need to be anyone singing for it to be called a song. No need for the rude tone, especially when your comment isn't needed.
@@naco5571 “A song is defined as a set of words or short poems meant to be sung and set to a certain type of music. Songs consist of many different components: lyrics, verses, refrain, and meter. Lyrics are a group of words that make up a song and are usually broken up into verses.” -As you can see, my good man, a person such as yourself does need some education. Note the phrase, MEANT TO BE SUNG.
@@pauldavies5611 Keep in mind that classical music of the 18th and 19th centuries may not necessarily conform to our modern dictionary definitions. I don't appreciate your condescendence either.
My absolute favorite thing about piano is everyone plays the same pieces differently. And it can tell a lot about people. I started to learn this, i hope once i can play it as good as you!
Thanks for your beautiful words, I very much agree! Btw are you learning with this video? I'm just wondering, since I haven't really got feedback on that :) Anyways I wish you all the best with this piece!
@@SeverinBrast Yes, i always learn with videos, checking how others play. I might have some things to fix in mine!
In my opinion this is the best performance of this piece on the entire youtube Bravo
@@timelord4514 That's a huge compliment haha :) If you really think so, that's much appreciated :D
How beautiful you play, great 🌬️❄️
Thanks a lot! So glad you liked it! 🤗
Thanks for the tutorial! This makes me play it all year LONG!!!
@@zayarskyiyaroslav You're very welcome! Keep playing :)
3:09 is my favorite part of this composition..well played!
*everyone’s favorite part
Yeah, mine too :D There's something about it... Glad you liked it!
@@griffin__sutek4958if you haven't, check out ua-cam.com/video/QL3K6e9K63Q/v-deo.html
@@griffin__sutek4958 mine is 1:34
My favorite part is 0:01
learning this piece now! Your video is very helpful and you performed it beautifully!
You got this! Glad you liked my video :)
Wieder einmal sehr tolle Effekte! 😀 👍
Vielen Dank!
Great performance, thank you!
Glad you liked it :)
what a beautiful and delightful piece
@@SoulRobot33210 Indeed it is, glad you liked it :)
Nice to see on synthesis, I think you're the first one to do it, thank you, and we'll done playing
You're very welcome! 😁 Thanks for your comment!
Wow, this is very well played. You're a young pianist. Congratulations to you. ❤❤❤❤
Appreciate it, thank you so much! 😊
Awesome. This is exactly what I'm looking for👍
Glad I could help! Are you learning the piece with my video?
@@SeverinBrast Nah, this is way out of my level, but I might give it a try later on. And I do really enoy the way you play it
The song is so amazing you play like a pro I love you how you play !!!!!
Thank you so much for your conpliments! Much appreciated! 😊
This is so damn smooth!! Loved it🤍
Aww, thank you! :)
your left hand played is really soft, while right hand is slightly hard (maybe because my audio system?).But still love it better than the new version one! Thank you for share...
Yes, you're right, but it's not your audio system. I played it this way 😁 Thanks for your comment!
I agree on that point, hinting to the left hand will bring more variety into your play. Thank you anyway for the video.
@@j.thomas1420whichever hand has the melody should play slightly harder . It is a habit generally to play with the right harder as it is has more often the melody . But in polyphonic pieces such this or bach , the pianist must be conscious to which hand should sound more . The same goes along with other expressions in music . In one word : symmetry
@@ΠαναγιώτηςΑλεξανδρόπουλος-β1γ it's not correct to state about "which hand should play harder" but it's more precise to discus about which line is melodic or important. A single hand can both play a Melody Line and some accompagnement, for exemple Chopin op10 n3. Both hands can even contribute to a unique melodic line, Liszt or even Mendelssohn like to do that. Buts always just emphasing the melody can be boring, sometimes even contre-chant or bassa need to express.
@@j.thomas1420 yes you are right . Sometimes a single hand plays two paths ; at this case the melody and another path.
Still, the nature of this piece doesn't involve this kind of polyphony. So, while your argument is absolutely correct and more precise, mine is refering straight to the piece
I love this softer way of playing! great stuff brother 👏
You're the first one to say that haha, so glad you like it!
very smooth and well done played my favorite🏅
Thank you! Very glad you enjoyed it 🙂
You can't do such dynamics one the harpsichord 😂
Well played
True, but it has its very own sound. Not really a fan of that sound tho. 😁
Awesome ❤️
Happy you liked it! 🙂
@@SeverinBrast I'm glad for you :)
Beautiful
@@user-en6cz8lx7p Thank you ❤️
I am learning it right now. I hope I could it so well as you do
Thank you so much! If you hve any questions, don't hesitate to ask :)
Watch and listen Andrei Gavrilov playing this piece. He plays it AMAZING 🤩🤩🤩
I knowww, I'm familiar with his version :D
I love it❤❤
Thanks ❤
This was posted on my birthday
Nice and accurate intetpretation! However I would play the left hand chords harder because theyre almost inaudible.
very nice
@@ravichristian6364 Thank you :)
You are amazing!!!!!!
Thanks a lot, mate!
Dreamcatcher - Good Night brought me here :D
Оригинально)
very nice! :D
Thank youu :)
thank you
I'm happy that you liked my interpretation. Thanks a lot for your support!
❤❤❤❤
Für Barock echt schön. Optik paßt...Runde Sache!
OMG😮❤
@@teon505Thank youuu ❤️
Very nice!!💜 Subbed #336💙
Thank you! 🙏
so beautiful, subscribed! oh and by the way - what midi visualiser do you use?
Thanks a lot for your support! In this video we used MIDIVisualizer by kosua20, but now we mainly use SeeMusic.
Superbe! Je suis en train de l'apprendre mais quelle est cette version ? Elle est beaucoup plus "dense" que la mienne. Merci. Maria
Merci beaucoup! C'est la version originale de Händel. On peut trouver la partition ici: imslp.org/wiki/Suite_in_G_minor%2C_HWV_432_%28Handel%2C_George_Frideric%29
Is there an rcm grade for this? I may do it for a recital
@@Phoenix-u5r Sorry, I'm not familar with the RCM grading system. Maybe you can look it up online :)
How can I search a sheet?? I really want to play
Here you go :)
imslp.org/wiki/Suite_in_G_minor%2C_HWV_432_(Handel%2C_George_Frideric)
The ORIGINAL fly me to the moon
render it without the psychedelic colors on the keys..well played!
Haha, thanks! :D
What grade is this
What do you mean by grade? I've heard of different systems, but I don't know too much about them.
0:37
Он, наверное, охеренно играет в тетрис🎉
Я - чемпион мира. :D
Великолепно! Есть ли возможность скачать ноты ? Спасибо.
Thanks! Here you go: imslp.org/wiki/Suite_in_G_minor%2C_HWV_432_%28Handel%2C_George_Frideric%29
Thanks a lot!)
Where can i download sheet note please?
imslp.org/wiki/Suite_in_G_minor%2C_HWV_432_%28Handel%2C_George_Frideric%29
Congratulations, is there any way to use both hands at the same time. Because I can't :D
Practise xD But you could start with some basic g-minor chords in the left hand and try to improvise with the g-minor scale a bit in the right hand...Sounds complicated, but that's basically what the whole piece is about. Good luck!
@Little Nook oow, thanks :)
@@furkan8399 harika ötesi, başka dünyalara götüren türden.
Why does it sound like Michel Legrand?
How many Iphones down !
this music is very sad
хорош
большое спасибо
In your right hand you are playing triplet rhythm quarter note + eighth instead of dotted eighth + sixteenth rhythm
I dont know most about handel i also dont find it interesting , but in this music i like him
Well uhh... Glad you enjoyed it!
右手と左手の色をわけてほしかった 残念です
Its not a romantic piece... play like a real barocquine beacose its it
not great not terrible
Too many personal added notes...
The whole essence of baroque music and even this piece in particular is the performers own improvisation and interpretation
@@PoopyHeadGames This version isn't even that ornamented compared to others. He would hate the version Handel and Scarlatti play in God Rot Tunbridge Wells, or the best version, Ludger Remy's interpretation
Baroqueless behaviour (few personal added notes)
🤓
All actual concerts use this version (for the intro), And better than just rather that ostinato modernists are proud of
3:08