Throughout the discussion of Xi ’s ruling experience, I would like to ask what other Western leaders have ruling experience? Especially Trump, what experience does he have to lead the country.
if china wants to invade some places…” actually US invaded, and is still invading many places 视频后 我觉得 傅高义 自以为是，，，中国人（黄种人）不可以影响美国 不可以全世界吗。 难道只能是有白人至上？ 美国 英国 犹太名族 ??? 亲美 亲欧 亲白人血统能说话。。。。 能看的懂中文的不要做奴隶。
stupid ，chinese communists killed chinese people more than 2 times japanese killed chinese in ww2, . but internationally it's also a big threat. the North korea regime that it has been supporting also killed many people, including those who tried to escapefrom North Korea, they were sent back by the communist china to face a certain death or torture.. , how about the red Khmer that the communists had supported, the massacred people require a sorry from the communist China. how about 2003 SARS, they hided the situation inside China (god knows how many mainland chinese died of the virus), and then suddenly it spreaded to Hong Kong without any information from China , killing more than 300 HKer . the communist government doesn't learn from it obviously in the recent wuhan virus outbreak . but the wuhan virus is no match to the chinese communist virus. it makes some mainland Chinese lack any empathy to the victims of chinese communists, such as Liu Xiaobo, HK protestors who became floating naked bodies, Wukan village dead villager, Uyghurs killed and Uyghurs being tortured and sent to concentration camps .
He wasn't right about HK 's movement. He said the reason of the movement bz young people' s hopeless future. I can't believe this was said by him. HK movement's core reason was Chinese government broke their promise of letting HK keep their life style and political systems for 50 years
also, hk's movement is not violent. 'Violence' is an illusion that the CCP and the Hong Kong regime want to show to the outside world, trying to blacken and defame the peaceful nature of the demonstrations.
The BBC is a stronghold of rumors. The Xinjiang and Hong Kong issues are all rumored by US and British intelligence agencies, making Americans hate China and deceiving Americans. It is China that has taken jobs from Americans. The main reason is that they are afraid that China will become stronger.
The BBC is a stronghold of rumors. The Xinjiang and Hong Kong issues are all rumored by US and British intelligence agencies, making Americans hate China and deceiving Americans. It is China that has taken jobs from Americans. The main reason is that they are afraid that China will become stronger.
@@rayjoo1735 So you are just repeating the mainstream media told you. Those who mistakenly believe that they have freedom are the most hopeless slaves. where is the WMD in iraq? Guantanamo Bay. Drone murder.White helmets.Ukrainian coup.PRISM.Police violence. you name it.
He used to hold the most prestigious position in the US. Even he has such a biased perspective on China, what can you expect for all others... World-renowned double standards and hypocrisy
@@gghdkkliam3390 If you would like to recall history, let's go a little further to WW2 and Siege of the International Legations. How many local civilian died due to Japan, UK and US?
Because you have no idea of the 'Historical Materialism' of Marxism: 'The superstructure is ultimately an expression of the mode of production on which the society is founded'.
marconi so US is allowed to start war with or sanction other countries at their wills and China should be punished for the wars they haven’t started which is basically fabricated by US fear mongers. Good practice of double standards.
When the US became independent, That was what the UK said to the US at the time. Britain has a great sense of superiority and treats the United States like an aristocratic attitude towards civilians. However, it was not until the War of 1812 that the US achieved independent status. Britain can only helplessly accept the existence of the US. In the US today, it is necessary to start accepting the rise of the Chinese as the British accept the rise of the Americans. This is the law of history. The British Empire will decline, and the US will decline.
A country ruled by a puppet regime can’t perpetuate let alone there is a despotic leader implementing idiotic diplomatic policy Communist party shall fall and in the aftermath of it’s fall China would rise again
@@gghdkkliam3390 The Communist Party has led the Chinese people to prosperity. If you understand Chinese history, hundreds of political parties in China have not been able to do so since 1840, so your view is not valid I am not arguing with you, but what is happening in reality, even if you individually curse a country with a huge population of 1.4 billion, you will know that your opinion is not so important.
@@jackc.3285 Such as 1. He said foreign journalists were maltreated by China government so they condemned and criticized it in their post. I want to roll my eyes .... 2. Young people in China generally dislike Japan... basically wrong, we know what is the different between history and nowadays 3. Xi has no experience in working in Beijing... Dose he really know Xi was a Vice President before, and the meaning of Vice President in China? The job takes how many years in Beijing? And so on.... just to name a few....
I agree with some of the views, however, for most of them, I am totally DISAGREE. Western contries has been very unfriendly to China for a long long time, they blame China for almost everything and being such hypocricy (e.g. doubt standard). I don't think that China and Chinese people are not treating you well enough, conversely, it is you western people are discriminating China from the bottom of your heart, and that, is the root cause.
they r afraid of china,more accuracy saying is they r afraid of chinese in the mainland ！they r smart,work hard,and less money need.but they can do more.
Thanks for your analysis and sharing the political landscape of the past and the present. Unfortunately current leader with limited education and control freak, he finally wakes the whole Western world !
What the old man said is very objective, but any country and region faces many problems. Under the current circumstances, the rise of China is inevitable.
Mr. Xin 美国这100年打了113场战争。到底谁强硬。。中国近30年没有打仗。到底谁强硬？？ 美国人要的是中国不参与国际事务。不在国际事务上与美国争夺主导权。美国需要的是一个1993年的中国。。而不是一个2019年的中国。。因为中国的强大带给他压力。所以他必须打压你。而打压你。你反抗。就是强硬？这是什么屌逻辑？
He tried to portray Xi as an unfriendly, aggressive, horrifying leader while Deng was open and western-friendly. He helps justify that China itself is the main reason for the tension. I am shocked that a renowned scholar concluded Chinese leaders in such a simple and inaccurate way.
Well they are far more knowledgeable in the subject than any from China. The citizens of China didn't even know the proper history of their own country because the ccp skewed it so horribly.
Ezra Vogel used to be a very insightful and a leading scholar in east asian studies in the West, a pioneer even, that is - in the old Deng era and 4 east asian tigers days. He seems to be recycling the materials abit here and have not updated his insights with time, anchoring and forming his views more based from the last era.
Translation: “Only I can be strong, but not you. Otherwise, we have to be equal.” Does he means “when you week, I will let you take my advantage, which means I will give you money for free.”? So, you send money to other people in order to make them weak. I don’t understand the logic. interesting.
He means “ Our police can use guns in USA but I need to blame you using spontoon . USA can send Army to another country but I need to blame you using your army in your country. We can earn money from you but your Economy cannot over me. How fair he said
He just mentioned right at the beginning that the trade surplus made on China side will finally create conflicts on countries’ relationship. I hope it’s not as complicated as you through.
You missed the point he addressed " China was Weak, but now China is Strong so we(USA) wants fair play." Where was this guy when USA was taking advantage of weak China.
習鄧比較，時空背景皆有極大差異，無法比較。
鄧在美國極須聯中抗蘇的年代，理解西方領導人，不是重點，
彼時西方視中國為一個抗蘇的朋友。
今日的習，因為理解西方領導人的眞實對中立場，
認為中國是競爭敵手，所謂因瞭解而分開，這才是習的態度。
Throughout the discussion of Xi ’s ruling experience, I would like to ask what other Western leaders have ruling experience? Especially Trump, what experience does he have to lead the country.
Trump simply doesn't know how to handle the event in Minneapolis and said nothing on it during a press conference.
Yeah, that's funny.
Ha..ha..ha...
haha, trump born in america so he doesn’t need ruling experience and can rule the whole world.
yeah ,I agree
He's basically saying "if China plays by the rules laid down by the US, the US won't be hostile then"... No shit.
如果國際人士仍然以自我偏執的觀點與保護西方白人地球優勢為目的，那任何說詞都只是掩蓋目的的文語而無濟於世界種族和平。
西方的教授都是玩语境的高手 不经意间就侧面烘托很多不正确却又无法辩论的观点去影响听者。
if china wants to invade some places…” actually US invaded, and is still invading many places
视频后 我觉得 傅高义 自以为是，，，中国人（黄种人）不可以影响美国 不可以全世界吗。 难道只能是有白人至上？ 美国 英国 犹太名族 ??? 亲美 亲欧 亲白人血统能说话。。。。 能看的懂中文的不要做奴隶。
@@nicoh8050 goddamn right！
偏执？你在说你的习大大吗？😂😂
"The better they can treat Americans, the better the western views of China will be" 🤣 They just want every country to be their puppy.
傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。
I think what he said is: be better to treat American JOURNALIST, the better view of China will be reported.
Well his allegiance and loyalty is with the US, we must respect that.
@@Helen-tz6lu I think you must be too simple too naive if you really believe what he says :-)
@@jackchan3988 你能说中国话吗
Sorry to say this professor's speech is totally out of date!
Exactly!
Yes
Why?Can you tell me?I am Chinese.
too old idea from an old man
the idea from cold war
不必去肯定否定什么，因为曾经肯定的人错了，曾经否定的人也错了，历史会证明一切！希望大家安好！身体健康！
一句无比正确的废话
你高看自己了，因为你啥也肯定不了，也否定不得
因为你啥也不知道，假装有文化？
二次病毒又回来，暴雨天象可怕，
还是回墙叫起家人逃命吧，葛洲坝要溃堤了，你逃的越远越好
我可能无处讲真话，但我绝不到处讲假话：我可能为五斗米折腰，但我绝不为不义之财屈膝；
我可能没有勇气做义人，但我绝不出卖和攻击义人；我可能不想追求崇高，但我绝不卑污如蛆；
我可能无力翻越那堵墙，但我绝不撤掉翻墙者的梯子；我可能无法为自由擎火把，但我绝不为奴役唱赞歌。
@@暗香晚风 你是每个地方都要复制一段吗🌚
@@暗香晚风 那你是谁？你谁也不是。你只是收了钱，复制，黏贴，黏贴，黏贴，黏贴，黏贴，黏贴的狗。
讲的非常透彻客观，做为中国人欢迎这样理性的观点和声音
@芝麻 活该台湾进步不了🐸🐸🐸
@芝麻 台湾人还在文化大革命时期。太不进步了
傅高义算是个很不错的学者了，邓小平时代我也读过，还是很佩服他的。可惜立场和眼光和意识形态这种东西，不可能完全兼顾，兼听则明吧
反正他个人没有恶意，意识形态不同，这是肯定的。
公平冷静的分析让人更加容易理解问题所在，和推测未来的发展趋势。
dandong Xu 此老全是欧美媒体报道的採摘，无自己研究发现，好在哪里?
好好发现一下，切尔诺贝利和美国新冠的应对吧，你会发现问题所在
同意
国人需要正视问题，不只是看自己所看，听自己所听，也同样要看他人所看，听他人所听。也无需见不到、听不得他人有不同的见解。学会看到问题才能强我中华
自己开心就好。别想多了。
那你学到了什么 说来听听
闭嘴吧 太年轻了你 ！这老头比公知还厉害 ,洗脑呢！ 黑的说成白的。
@@mikelee3825 他说的够客观够中立了好吧！你来说说他把什么黑的说成白的了。
youtube少數具質素的留言
傅高义先生是美国最早一批观察新中国问题的人，是哈佛费正清中国研究中心主任，其著作《邓小平时代》是目前最客观全面的改革开放初期中国的历史，这位大师于2020.12.21去世，其生前促进了中美合作，外交部发言评论傅高义先生是中国人民的老朋友。
“when china is weak, it doesn't matter so much.......”
They always wanna a weak China…so they can get everything they want.😡
Yes, not much blame of human rights for other contries like India, and not much blame for authority for other contries like Singapore.
it doesn't matter for you but matter for Chinese
When a bad guy is weak, it doesn't matter. But now he is strong.
stupid ，chinese communists killed chinese people more than 2 times japanese killed chinese in ww2, . but internationally it's also a big threat. the North korea regime that it has been supporting also killed many people, including those who tried to escapefrom North Korea, they were sent back by the communist china to face a certain death or torture.. , how about the red Khmer that the communists had supported, the massacred people require a sorry from the communist China. how about 2003 SARS, they hided the situation inside China (god knows how many mainland chinese died of the virus), and then suddenly it spreaded to Hong Kong without any information from China , killing more than 300 HKer . the communist government doesn't learn from it obviously in the recent wuhan virus outbreak . but the wuhan virus is no match to the chinese communist virus. it makes some mainland Chinese lack any empathy to the victims of chinese communists, such as Liu Xiaobo, HK protestors who became floating naked bodies, Wukan village dead villager, Uyghurs killed and Uyghurs being tortured and sent to concentration camps .
他说的香港问题部分不对，这些示威不是因为抱怨高房价和没工作，是制度、法治、意识形态和价值观等问题。先看看他们的五大诉求，还有对于高度自治、双普选等诉求，对打压言论自由和新闻自由以及不公正的执法等等的抗拒
+1 , 不一會兒有小粉紅攻擊我
不一定，即使我确实不喜欢他们做出的恐怖行为和破坏行为，但造成这种情况的一种客观原因也是现在香港的阶层固化，高房价工作等等经济原因。
社会矛盾肯定是引导性因素，再加上某些势力引导。就像美国一些州游行要求解除隔离，你看着很反智，觉得美国人脑残。但是本质是这些人没工作没收入，而且储蓄率又低，饿死和概率病死，必然是选后者，当然这种大规模一致性的游行肯定是有势力从中引导，川普都在推特喊话支持游行
个人感觉主要还是优越感不在了，本来你一直踩在别人头上的，这些年却被别人踩着，之前香港人一直看不起大陆人，台湾人，感觉自己是高级华人🍒再加上这些年的鸭梨山大🍐
虽然我不是香港人 但是也应该有房价的因素吧 房价过高 人们生活质量低 就产生对港府及中共的不满 出现一个导火索 就马上被引爆了
“中国正在变得强大，我们很担忧他会做我们现在做的事情，侵略别国，干预他国内政，抢夺资源这些事情，只有我们可以做，他也想要，就太可怕了”
典型的强盗逻辑
以小人之心度君子之腹莫过于此
阿智 他们当老大了 不得像我欺负她一样欺负我啊
不。分別是美國侵略别国，干预他国内政，世界活在二戰後歐美沒甚麼大問題。換一個領頭國家看看﹖就不知道結果怎樣了。
其實有甚麼問題﹖中國人不是最相信弱肉強食嗎﹖美國就擺著要把你攪死。有甚麼問題﹖你中國就像個嬰兒哭吧。
迄今为止最客观的采访，内容也十分的好，学习到好多
Been to Shanghai. Love the view of Shanghai it just looks so good at night!
傅高義：虽然美国在世界各地传播战争和分裂，但是中国居然在填海造陆，造成地缘政治风险，我表示担忧。习是红二代，政治经验不足，只在河北，福建和其他地区工作过（我只能说其他地区，不能说浙江上海，不然配上窑洞的照片没有说服力），没有在北京工作过，这是硬伤啊。虽然特朗普富二代出生，没有政治经验，但是问题不大，美国有最好的制度。香港问题就是房租太高，大陆人把香港人的工作给抢了，和外国势力培训分裂活动，提供策划和资金的影响不大。大陆要让港独和平示威，保护他们的人权。什么？英港时期连游行的权利都没有，现在是一国两制，你得解决学生的问题。我是哈佛教授，我说的话没有偏见。：）
什麼教授，community college?英治時期沒有遊行權利？當年保衛釣魚台運動知道嗎？
河北，福建和其他地区 真的是坐实了 这个人就是良知有问题，而不是无知。
垃圾教授，地摊文学的水平
"is this what good guys will do?" Edward Snowden
"have I told you I'm good guy?
No one knows “rob and spying” more than me" Donald Trump
After 4 years Americans were suffered more than before
Great interview. I agree with everything he's said. More and more experts want to speak correctly and objectively.
Helen Kim in ur dreams China will be worse , coz u never been here
He wasn't right about HK 's movement. He said the reason of the movement bz young people' s hopeless future. I can't believe this was said by him. HK movement's core reason was Chinese government broke their promise of letting HK keep their life style and political systems for 50 years
沙币
also, hk's movement is not violent. 'Violence' is an illusion that the CCP and the Hong Kong regime want to show to the outside world, trying to blacken and defame the peaceful nature of the demonstrations.
前边还是西方主流的说法，不过全部看完后不得不说，位学者已经是很客观了，少有的给BBC点个赞
听不懂人话，和鬼👻说去吧
避重就輕地從西方國家的觀點來看中國的發展而完全不討論西方國家、尤其是美國和中國交往過程中的目的和美國態度改變的原因。尤其是對中日和中美関係的歷史背景避而不談.要麼是老了過氣了，要麼就是存心的以片面的事實來帶領思唯以達到敘述其故事的目的。標準的西方國家慣用手法！
Very informative, hope to see more similar interviews!
It's hard to see a rational comment like this here. It shows that you have an open mind and unbiased judgement.
@@georgelee7884 We watch CCTV together.
The BBC is a stronghold of rumors. The Xinjiang and Hong Kong issues are all rumored by US and British intelligence agencies, making Americans hate China and deceiving Americans. It is China that has taken jobs from Americans. The main reason is that they are afraid that China will become stronger.
He is honestly telling the truth, specially the part of comparing Xi with Deng
The BBC is a stronghold of rumors. The Xinjiang and Hong Kong issues are all rumored by US and British intelligence agencies, making Americans hate China and deceiving Americans. It is China that has taken jobs from Americans. The main reason is that they are afraid that China will become stronger.
感觉虽然说的很平和，不过还是没有逃脱人的劣根性，他只看到了他想要看到的，并且加上了自己的臆想
比起中國的戰螂外交官 整天說鬼話 好太多了. 外國學者說話都是基於資訊. 中共說的任何話都是基於政治正確. 中國已經是垃圾中的垃圾了.
你也没有摆脱作为无知韭菜的劣根性
@@Aska-oe1dy 确实，根本不配称做人，天天说假话，还说的不利索。念个稿子都磕磕巴巴，都退化成智障了
单看你这句话，中学生的水平。说话平和与人的劣根性没有必然的联系，你却是在臆想他只看了他想要看到的。所以要评价一个学者，要么你达到他level，要么你至少读过他的书。
@@Aska-oe1dy 是的啊，看看现在尾角爸爸忽悠黑人的鬼话，什么时候你也过去你尾角爸爸那边黑命贵抗议一下，感受一下自由国家的子弹和毒打？
2 Questions:
What China will do to the world when they are stronger?
What the US have done to the world when they are strong.
Another question: What China is doing to her own people now?
thankqwerty lmao nothing. Their own people are happy with their government it’s only foreigners like you who has nothing better to do cares
@@thankqwerty thankqwert for you concern about China but no thanks. Mind your own business.
Yan8527 When China become stronger ,the world gonna be a Socialism world....There’s no freedom and human rights anymore
@@rayjoo1735 So you are just repeating the mainstream media told you. Those who mistakenly believe that they have freedom are the most hopeless slaves. where is the WMD in iraq? Guantanamo Bay. Drone murder.White helmets.Ukrainian coup.PRISM.Police violence. you name it.
He used to hold the most prestigious position in the US. Even he has such a biased perspective on China, what can you expect for all others... World-renowned double standards and hypocrisy
CCP is the new Nazi. You are the one who is biased.
@@MrHkl8324 I CANT BREATH..... who is the new Nazi in comparison
K Ninja Maybe ask those died from great Chinese famine and the cultural revolution
@@gghdkkliam3390 If you would like to recall history, let's go a little further to WW2 and Siege of the International Legations. How many local civilian died due to Japan, UK and US?
thank you
上油管才發現，這些高談闊論的學者，不管有著怎樣的頭銜，看待中國問題總是一頭霧水。鄧小平不强硬？這是那個宇宙的鄧小平？對香港回收，對經濟開放，强硬的鄧小平才是歷史上真實的鄧小平。對於習近平的執政經驗，他的意思是不夠歷練，只能説對於中國的領導幹部，管理過兩個大省意味著什麽，一無所知。
支持一个离去的,打击一个现任的.
笑死了，小平是我见过最强硬的了，64敢用军队镇压学生，那可是冒着全国罢工罢学甚至军队倒戈的危险。
再没经验也比一个建筑包工头领导美国有经验吧
看看美国民主选出的领导人，执政能力堪比吴亦凡
Gerald zhang 不要侮辱我凡哥..只是娘炮了点 还是有点脑的 这任美国政府没脑
公平、客观、透彻！感谢您的讲解！
the world needs to learn how to get along with a stronger China instead of getting all bitter and jealous.
傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。
When he said the protests in 2019 are due to economic problem in hk, I’d say he made a wrong diagnosis of the whole thing.
He did not understand the reason
Because you have no idea of the 'Historical Materialism' of Marxism: 'The superstructure is ultimately an expression of the mode of production on which the society is founded'.
Oh US has "no problem" if the issue on Taiwan can be solved peacefully?
傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。
Native
Thank you BBC . 🙇🙇
👍👍👍💪💪💪👏👏👏⛽⛽⛽⛽ .
Hmm, I always feel awkward when someone who does not really understood China is teaching how to deal with the country...
Disaster incoming...
China invade? why it sounds so funny when a American say this? Who invaded Middle east? Who build military base around the world?
marconi so US is allowed to start war with or sanction other countries at their wills and China should be punished for the wars they haven’t started which is basically fabricated by US fear mongers. Good practice of double standards.
marconi so you mean Americans and the westerners should attack China because you THINK China may invade you?
@@ChnesRep中華民國OfTaiwan Let US apologize for HIV and Spanish flu first.
How about those fake islands that china built in South China Sea?
当今的美国不把国际当做社交圈而是控制区。当今的中国也应该改变，不应该把美国当做社交圈。
现在的革命小将听不明白正常分析了。只要有一点点不合心意的表达，就怒气冲冲。Vogel已经是非常平和与善意的理解中国，小将们有没有稍微做些努力去理解不同的观点。在他们眼里中国没有任何缺点，全是他人的错。这个趋势让人担心。
“China is rising and strong” - that’s the key point.
have u read all of his speech？ Can u show some respect instead of acting like a dumb？
Rosy Lau I did finish and nothing new in his speech.
I will pay attention for the words I use.
傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。傅高义也是一条为美国利益服务的狗。。。当美国人随便入侵他国的时候。。。你有个狗屁吗。。虚伪的美国学者。。该杀。。。
中共从1978年改革开放加入WTO就从来没有遵守规则，不尊重知识产权，偷盗技术，市场不开放，贸易逆差太严重，这种情况在朱镕基时代的韬光养晦还能暂时忽悠欧美国家。但问题是迟早要爆发的。
到了习近平的大国崛起，中国制造2025，一代一路，南海问题，就把问题加速化了。
所以问题是迟早要爆发的，习近平只是提早把遮羞布掀开了。
同时要问一个问题，中国真的强大了吗？
ua-cam.com/video/hGf3B2u16kU/v-deo.html&feature=emb_logo
@@sgfthank 你个傻逼。。去看看你的美国爸爸多尊重人权吧。。你脑子满是屎尿吗
When the US became independent, That was what the UK said to the US at the time.
Britain has a great sense of superiority and treats the United States like an aristocratic attitude towards civilians.
However, it was not until the War of 1812 that the US achieved independent status. Britain can only helplessly accept the existence of the US.
In the US today, it is necessary to start accepting the rise of the Chinese as the British accept the rise of the Americans.
This is the law of history. The British Empire will decline, and the US will decline.
A country ruled by a puppet regime can’t perpetuate let alone there is a despotic leader implementing idiotic diplomatic policy Communist party shall fall and in the aftermath of it’s fall China would rise again
@@gghdkkliam3390 The Communist Party has led the Chinese people to prosperity. If you understand Chinese history, hundreds of political parties in China have not been able to do so since 1840, so your view is not valid
I am not arguing with you, but what is happening in reality, even if you individually curse a country with a huge population of 1.4 billion, you will know that your opinion is not so important.
@@陈陳-t5c 很了不起的样子，也就清朝 军阀 国民党 共产党这四个时期，何来几百个政党？说富裕，周边相似民族特性的韩国 日本 台湾哪个不比中国富？14亿人口960万土地的确挺强，全国的大部分财富和大公司多数都在共产党手上，哪个国家不怕这样的国家。糟糕的外交政策，宣扬民族精神，大国崛起，民族自豪感，没了老一辈领导人的务实低调。
@@佛光初现 然而，韩国日本和台湾都丧失了一样东西，那就是国家的主权，他们成为了美国的附庸。身为中国人应该更加自信，中国会变得更好！对共产党不满可以理解，但不能全盘否定它。你觉得用美国民主中国会更好吗？还是你觉得美国希望看到一个比现在更强大的中国呢，美国人找出中国社会矛盾是为了让中国变得更好吗？这对美国有好处还是美国人有善良的菩萨心肠？我觉得共产党不算这世上最坏的政党，如果你生活在印度也许有更多你看不惯的事，但美国和西方没那么关注印度的丑闻，你也知道这是为什么吧
@@稻花香里说丰年-z9i 日本韩国附庸啥了？怎样附庸法？赚的钱给美国了？领导人是美国人？韩国日本没觉得被侵犯，你倒是自作多情可怜起别人。他们某些地方可能要妥协，但是他们价值观是一样的，互惠互助，美国更像是他们的大哥，而不是主人。看看北朝鲜多有骨气，苏联和中国的小弟，活得个清贫，人民给金胖子做奴隶。
我感到非常奇怪和吃惊的是，西方学者在谈及与中国有关的国际问题时，为何不提及第二次世界大战后所确定的世界秩序及有关中国领土领海领空划分和确定的原则。
去問一下俄羅斯
@芝麻 我是团员你想蒙我？沙雕😂
奇怪大病毒怎么在你美爹那里流行了，对中国只影响了武汉
@芝麻 ....美国感染人数超5百万了，是god's plan 吗？
@@baronchen4510 隱藏疫情的國家不會感到羞愧嗎？真可恥
傅高义是全球中国问题的顶级专家，他的著作受到党报的认可。整体看下来是非常客观的观点，务实且有参考性，这样的观点应该给予冷静中肯的评价。
非常有趣的评论；毕竟真理是越辩越明的，应该多听听外界的声音，但我们同时也应该要保持清醒。
我可能无处讲真话，但我绝不到处讲假话：我可能为五斗米折腰，但我绝不为不义之财屈膝；
我可能没有勇气做义人，但我绝不出卖和攻击义人；我可能不想追求崇高，但我绝不卑污如蛆；
我可能无力翻越那堵墙，但我绝不撤掉翻墙者的梯子；我可能无法为自由擎火把，但我绝不为奴役唱赞歌。
因为我想做一个“人”，而不是任人宰割铲除的奴隶和蛆虫
暗香826 你说的是什么意思？什么叫奴役，谁奴役你了？
BBC是造謠大本營 新疆 香港問題都是美 英情報單位造謠的 讓美國人仇恨中國 欺騙美國人 是中國搶走了 美國人的工作 主因就是害怕中國越來越強大
他的觀點很中立，確實也是一個獨特的視角，很受用，也很有借鑒意義，鄧小平和現在這位的差距實在太大。。沒法說
还记得以前蛤蛤怎么被黑的吗？
时代不一样了
中国改革开放自邓以来三朝积累的问题，如果还要解决的的话，如果还要以内在改革的方式解决的话，只能走贤明专制的道路了
但对外还是不要有战争就好，不是时候
都不是同时代的人比较起来也没有意思，就拿林肯和特朗普比有意思吗？
就一句话，中国得一直怂着
好怕怕哦！
Great Van Chang 楼主才是大智慧～然而美国想掐断你脖子就掐断，从华为事件就能看出来。还是需要养精蓄锐，不要觉得自己行了，然并卵～没有疫情19年国内经济好么？经济好，国内过上好日子比什么都强。
这就是区别--人与人的命，自己就划清了
奴隶就是一条奴隶命嚒？我开始信了，难怪他们世世代代做奴隶，不敢抬头
我可能无处讲真话，但我绝不到处讲假话：我可能为五斗米折腰，但我绝不为不义之财屈膝；
我可能没有勇气做义人，但我绝不出卖和攻击义人；我可能不想追求崇高，但我绝不卑污如蛆；
我可能无力翻越那堵墙，但我绝不撤掉翻墙者的梯子；我可能无法为自由擎火把，但我绝不为奴役唱赞歌。
因为我想做一个“人”，而不是任人宰割铲除的奴隶和蛆虫
阳痿的男人，他倒是想硬，做梦都想硬....
@@暗香晚风 不会的华夏民族民族一直都有民族凝聚力，之所以内部不统一团结，是少数家族及其爪牙为了少数人的利益出卖了自强不息的中华。
非常的客观！
无可否认 男人一生至死都不断犯的错误就是 自以为是 无一人例外
包括习大大？
真是不分国籍种族的无一例外
Basically he says nothing scholarly in this video.
@@jackc.3285 Such as 1. He said foreign journalists were maltreated by China government so they condemned and criticized it in their post. I want to roll my eyes .... 2. Young people in China generally dislike Japan... basically wrong, we know what is the different between history and nowadays 3. Xi has no experience in working in Beijing... Dose he really know Xi was a Vice President before, and the meaning of Vice President in China? The job takes how many years in Beijing? And so on.... just to name a few....
I agree with some of the views, however, for most of them, I am totally DISAGREE. Western contries has been very unfriendly to China for a long long time, they blame China for almost everything and being such hypocricy (e.g. doubt standard). I don't think that China and Chinese people are not treating you well enough, conversely, it is you western people are discriminating China from the bottom of your heart, and that, is the root cause.
they r afraid of china,more accuracy saying is they r afraid of chinese in the mainland ！they r smart,work hard,and less money need.but they can do more.
这个老头水平很高，不偏不倚，直视问题根本，说的东西非常客观，而且剖析了问题的本质
他讲的非常客观，我们不应该被任何一方的意识形态所裹挟
一半真一半假 中国很多行为的国际背景以及国际事件他要么回避要么不知道
反贪只是选择性的，现在的发改委主任以前在我们当地腐败严重，还不是升迁去了中央，就是因为跟某人关系近。
水至清则无鱼，没办法，贪是人性
那个政府不贪不腐败？美国应是表表者！只是牠们懂得掩盖！就像印度，印尼，馬來西亚泰国等等更是可怕但为什么没人对他们批评什么的？。。。。甚至澳洲也存在。贪腐不可怕，最可怕的是不作为！我居住澳洲三十多争我以我理解什么是官僚什么是不作为！
在任的官二代在香港買高級別墅，建立公司，全部都係貪人民的血汗金錢，為什麼不反？
你认为是按什么来选择的？
不过，现在基层服务态度真的好多了，你说的呢我不了解不好说
Thanks for your analysis and sharing the political landscape of the past and the present. Unfortunately current leader with limited education and control freak, he finally wakes the whole Western world !
多謝你的講述.
关于美国黑人被警察谋杀事件非常关心！中国强烈谴责美国无视人权，当街虐杀黑人的恐怖事件表示关心！
美國警察違法比例原則，侵害人權，與香港警察無異，我覺得可以放在同件事上關心欸
大师就是大师 还是比较中肯 有见地的
扯淡 拿邓小平和习近平相比证明习近平能力不行简直扯淡！ 毛泽东之后没有任何人蒙和邓小平相比！说习近平没有压制反日情绪 日本从来没有对侵华道歉 凭什么不让人民反日 等等 总结一句话 中国人要做的就是逆来顺受就可以了 不能反驳
只是掩饰得比较好而已，英美最怕的就是亚洲团结共荣。看看菲律宾吧，菲律宾可不傻
我想问一个问题，香港新疆是我国内政，为什么美国人能如此自然地认为他们有权利干涉？
究竟是谁在称霸？美国的强权强盗行为，中国拍马也赶不上。我倒真希望有一天，中国能像美国那样，在美国的太平洋近海行驶航行自由，动不动就对各个州表示强烈关切，随随便便就能制裁美国的高科技企业。
你虐待自己的儿子，邻居过来报警 能算是家事吗？
如果一个独裁政府用不道德的手段压制国内民众，这算内政吗？非洲国家卢旺达，人数占多数的胡图族对图西族展开有组织有计划的大规模屠杀，这是卢旺达国家的内政吗？普选和港人自治是中英联合声明和香港特区基本法承认的。为何又要变着法的剥夺香港民众的自由与权利呢？
老教授 讲的基本没毛病 点赞！ 共产党像在走钢丝 ，处理不好国内的矛盾 ，老百姓不会饶恕的。 加油 为了幸福生活
What the old man said is very objective, but any country and region faces many problems. Under the current circumstances, the rise of China is inevitable.
Why are there many reporters who have no complaint in China , only American reporters feel unfair ?
Biases, double standards, hypocrisy, manipulation, American hegemony....you name it
要取得宽松 温和的国际环境确实要某些方面做妥协 问题在于在核心问题的坚守跟妥协之间找到平衡点 让双方满足以至于可以继续合作发展 特别是在全球目光中你不断崛起的大背景下 难 太难 前所未有的难！
说到底都是利益问题
不懂得收敛锋芒，只会招来更多的箭头。
說道中國GDP超越日本一事，我好像在傅高義的另外一個視頻中是反著說的，
他說日本1895年以來一直領先中國，現在被超越，日本人心理有點失衡。
本視頻中傅高義則說中國人超越日本，心理過於膨脹。
或許正反都對吧。
人均GDP比較符合民情吧 日本人均是中國的10倍
一个飘了一个心态崩了 没毛病啊
@@joele1445 你在逗我，你看过资料嘛，你有脑子嘛？
@@joele1445 你活在10年前吗？
@@joele1445 吃个西瓜得按小片买的垃圾人均
日本從不正面回應對亞洲國家的傷害，這是一個問題。
@中立观察者 不对吧 这样说来英国 德国 美国都没必要存在了尤其是美国近两百年才完成白人对印第安人的侵虐和种族灭绝。
很棒的中国通专家，拜读过大作《邓小平时代》，很赞
是的，很不错。这里回帖的好多个五毛和美分真的是够了，非黑即白的。
@@zhanghenry5298 我一个小粉红都觉得老人家讲的很好🤣
@@houjam1373 说明你听得进去实话、他赞中共的话也挺多；可很多人只喜欢赞美、批评都认为是污蔑、是轮子等等
相对而言很客观了，说得很好
白水春 。客观个屁，关于南海，一开始他就错了。南海九段线是中国领士，几十年前已经世界共识，现在发现有石油或其他资源了，各国翻面，想有着数，就说中国霸权。呸！
你真以为客观？有的议题讲的客观，不客观或者核心想表达的东西就隐藏在这里面，让人潜移默化的接收了他其实真正核心唯一想表达的东西，这就是老狐狸。记住，以前中国之所以可爱是因为弱小，现在的中国之所以不在可爱是因为强大，现今的局面中国高层早很多年前就预料到了吧，所以会搞北斗，会推一带一路等等。
中国人难道对老美还不够好吗？！？你们的记者常常写的又是什么？从来说句实话，中国人对白人是比较有好感的，难道您感觉不到？
那又怎樣呢？需要別人的時候假裝友好，一旦得逞過河拆橋
对，你永远都理解不了，某国的记者想写啥写啥的感觉，中国人问的永远不是如何解决问题，而是为什么有人提问题，为什么记者要说这些，为什么你们要反对我们，为什么你们什么都说
@@specialoperator-0543 你又能代表中国人了。某国的记者就该想写啥写啥，中国人就该听着，然后人家说什么，就去做什么。某些总想代表中国人的人，从来不去想什么才是对中国人好的，正确的事情。总以为自己看到了民族的劣根性，其实不知道自己才是那个劣根。
顺带说一句，无数事实都能够说明，中国人不仅在不断探求问题，更在解决问题。
911 時中國人不是拍手歡呼嗎？還是我記錯了😂
@@anomonyus-57 嗯，反恐就是万能令。
穆斯林确实部分人比较极端，我也认为他们不应该这样。
但问题是他们为什么要采取这种极端的手段？就跟前几天警察压死黑人，被黑人放火烧警察局一样，黑人为什么要这么做。
如果没有什么事把你逼成那样，你会去做那么极端的事情吗？
假如没有警察谋杀黑人，黑人会做极端的事吗？
一个巴掌拍不响，某些穆斯林那么极端，你也得想想为什么。
中國共產黨的奮鬥目標，不是超越美國，中國共產黨的奮鬥目標是十四億中國人的幸福生活🇨🇳🇨🇳👍👍👏👏
幸福到年轻人墨茶贫病而死吗？
很有深度的研究，真的应该看一看。
Mr. Xin
这是典型的霸权思维。。这人说的话全是放屁。他的既定思路是。美国必须压制中国。以这个立场去思考问题的。
南海问题。实际上在几十年前岛还是我们的。绝大部分都是二战后。被抢夺的。。拿回自己的东西。难道是强硬？？不应该？
Mr. Xin
美国这100年打了113场战争。到底谁强硬。。中国近30年没有打仗。到底谁强硬？？
美国人要的是中国不参与国际事务。不在国际事务上与美国争夺主导权。美国需要的是一个1993年的中国。。而不是一个2019年的中国。。因为中国的强大带给他压力。所以他必须打压你。而打压你。你反抗。就是强硬？这是什么屌逻辑？
你不是放屁？你来说说？那帮战螂更加无逻辑
@@爱健身的蜻蜓 什么逻辑？一定要按照美国人的思想发展才能发展？
他坚持的政治正确：共产党要维护西方人的利益，当发生利益冲突时，要懂得退让。
中国不能强大，更不能威胁西方，一旦强大，一定会侵害到他们的利益。
要继续与周边国家保持冲突，没有冲突，西方国家也会积极创造条件来制造混乱。
西方国家（尤其是五眼联盟国家）是这个世界的和平威胁，他们为了持续掠夺第三世界，不会放过任何一种可能性。
很中肯，观察很到位！
He tried to portray Xi as an unfriendly, aggressive, horrifying leader while Deng was open and western-friendly. He helps justify that China itself is the main reason for the tension. I am shocked that a renowned scholar concluded Chinese leaders in such a simple and inaccurate way.
Xi is friendly because he's a cute little bear.
Why show edited video? BBC can u please show full interview video?
"中美對抗"，但是对美国只字不提。
哪个中国专家谈过中美对抗中国的问题？
ua-cam.com/video/rwK8KqbtAU0/v-deo.html
@@giannigianni1457 对抗尼玛的黑笔，全尼玛是美国在打压中国，中国一直都是防守
@@bourne3852 一直好奇在BBC中文工作的都是怎样的一群人，带节奏永远冲在最前线。
普bourne 要不要脸？
纯粹是从美国利益、美国立场出发。意思是说：你要围堵我，我还得配合你围堵。我还得努力为你世界第一的位置努力奋斗。
其實就是兩個國家，你要第一我不讓你第一，你要強大我不讓你強大。你強大了我就有危險了。政治感覺就是黑社會。
傅高義是我的老師，他支持兩岸一心。我也有很多兩岸的朋友。傅老師見我問我知道李銳的事情嗎？我說知道，但是傅老師說要好好把握海外學習的機會，因為回國了會信息不流暢
“回了国信息不流畅”
不会翻墙基本也就告别智商了
@@黄婷婷-y6w 你是在說要打倒習近平
婷婷黄 对不起 现在都是在民主国花钱往墙里面翻，一二大经济体都了解才有竞争力。不像某些脑残
@@黄婷婷-y6w 你不知道你是违法行为吗 最近几个不都是什么事没有就进去了 如果有其他事 一个是寻衅滋事 一个是颠覆 就不是罚款那么简单了。
听了半天没有什么新意。这也要花美国纳税人的钱来研究？白左等于白ci
评价相当到位。
正好相反，恰恰是多年来没有西方记者对中国友善，也做不到客观，总是变着法扭曲事实，我们才会这么警惕。
哈哈哈哈，比如说黄继光事件是假的，说狼牙山五战士是编的，我真是受够了！还有各路公知争当汉奸的！真的是
如果把老先生的话美国和中国对调一下试试，会很有意思。
如果這编演説中美对調那就不是事實了，以今時今日中共的氣焰來看，中共早已經指點天下了，絕不會意圖和平相處了。
Sang Tsang 習近平這小學生膨脹了
对调一下就放不出来了，呵呵
Sang Tsang 指点天下不知道，但是美国发动的战争手指脚趾加起来不够数是真实发生的事。为什么不见你们去让美国反思呢
@@MGMG-ym6rk
对调一下，BBC就不会让他露脸，也不会上传影片
我觉得这是我在油管看过的最理性的
是的，同感
你们两个的评论很不理性。
傅教授说的很好。但是BBC，你们的配乐和画面特效很不好。傅教授一开始说的美官员的问题在很多美媒体中也是一样存在。
Same old cliche, can't believe Harvard waste their funds on these "experts"
Well they are far more knowledgeable in the subject than any from China. The citizens of China didn't even know the proper history of their own country because the ccp skewed it so horribly.
@@kaitoshinichi I think you are in the dream!
@@kaitoshinichi oh please!! Enlighten Us!!! Jesus sent from Trumpven
They will fund anyone as long as those people are fit in with their political agenda. BBC is extremely biased, they are really BPC.
Ezra Vogel used to be a very insightful and a leading scholar in east asian studies in the West, a pioneer even, that is - in the old Deng era and 4 east asian tigers days. He seems to be recycling the materials abit here and have not updated his insights with time, anchoring and forming his views more based from the last era.
这期节目非常不错，傅高义教授果然还是懂东方社会的，不像一些西方学者只知道胡喷
美国记者那节完全是扯淡
操作层面各国政府往往利用独家新闻“贿赂”记者换正面报道，但是关于中国的正面报道是不允许被登上版面的，就像亲中的UA-camr会被禁言下架一样🤷🤷🤷
@@黄婷婷-y6w 懂哥来辣
这位算是泰斗级别的学者了，也不能要求他们每个人都有这个水平，哈哈
Chris Kwan 懂哥来了？
@@黄婷婷-y6w 你好像纽约时报华盛顿邮报副总编 啥你都门清是吧？ 什么细节你都清楚 怎么让正面报道下架的你全看着了
In the meantime… the US left WHO 🤔
Because WHO found to be favoring China narrative over the truth. 🤔
Yeah that ain’t true. It’s Trump need someone to blame to cover all his failures about COVID-19 and WHO is speaking the truth
正确客观的对待与评价，上理性的分析值得一听
研究了一辈子，没研究透中国人的心理
中国人到现在为止心中仍然有一个天朝大国万邦来朝的梦，换句话说中国人根本没有任何平等的概念，金灿荣对于双赢的解释非常准确地反应了这一点
美国担心的是中国崛起会让他失去世界霸主的地位！
@@bin6116 你心中不这么想，就不会说出这种话
@@bin6116 人家双赢的解释本来就是开玩笑的，你断章取义
@@surewong9111 你说你学谁不好，偏学胡叼盘，你可没有他的技术好
美国手脚伸张全世界，四处打仗，这老头只字不提啊。
他提了也会被剪掉，比如开始说的美国在中国领海周边布防，一个设问句没有展开就结束了，事实上很可能谈了很多。
@@crazyameba 这就是言论自由吗，你尽管说，我可以让别人听不见
@@王小桃-h1t 著名的中立媒体据我所知全世界不超过三个。很无奈。
看不看到標題？「中美對抗」、「習鄧比較」與「香港問題」
小學老師有教你看題作答？
想看你想說的問題很多書籍和外國視頻也有，做人不要那麼狹窄
@@tyutyu3604 哦，你文化很高？ 几料的博士啊？在这装尼玛呢，还看题作答，我看你就只记得小学的文化吧，心胸狭隘的人，看见别人反驳，还教育别人心胸狭隘？ 你躺床上好好想想自己有多恶心吧。
Wasted 20mins of my life
我也在美国学过政治，到现在我还是觉得那门课让我受益匪浅。
但是这种东西，20分钟看下来，屁都没学到，我都不知道我刚看了什么。
解决工作与住房问题更加重要
解决中共 刻不容缓
@@kalasend 消毒水喝多了吧，想消灭中共应该去北京，而不是坐在电脑前打几个字就能消灭的，想做又没胆没出息的。
美国：我有招儿，学我，给他们选票。然后一切不变。你就有权利镇压他们了~（狗头）
@@kalasend 有良心的中国人都不同意
@@kalasend 有些人不但没脑子，现实中也很怂，只敢嘴炮不敢实际行动
中國對西方越好，西方會對中國越好，我真的笑到噴飯....
自強才會被尊重！中國人加油💪
视频后 我觉得 傅高义 自以为是，，，中国人（黄种人）不可以影响美国 不可以全世界吗。 难道只能是有白人至上？ 美国 英国 犹太名族 ??? 亲美 亲欧 亲白人血统能说话。。。。 能看的懂中文的不要做奴隶。
@@nicoh8050 可看得懂的正在做奴隶啊🤣
我们只是讨厌那些希望我们分裂的人
范淼 如果要分裂中國早在八國聯軍一役已經可以把中國分裂
@@Sam642009 中国史和世界史哪有那么肤浅...
别说没下口，港澳，台湾，新疆西藏，蒙古，东三省。
再说不具备威胁的中国分裂了有啥价值？无论是后期的清廷还是军阀，只是不同的半殖民地模式罢了。你要好处，也得有棒槌呀。
@@Sam642009 They didn't do that because they didn't want conflicts in China among themselves. Wise up, dude !
@@Sam642009 兄弟，八国联军基本上等于分裂的中国，削弱了清政府的集权统治。然后进入军阀割据，直到国民政府北伐才统一大部分国土。还有很多地方没有统一。现在其实就是在分裂中国啊，因为有人支持民主，但是大多数有人支持共产党。共产党的统治制度不允许第二个声音。这是矛盾所在。虽然我不能justify 共产党的所作所为，但是美国所作所为肯定不是为了我们的人民好。和平时期永远会比混乱强，制裁中国经济受伤的永远是底层人民，难道他们觉得那些高官会受损吗？但是美国也不在乎。
Lam SAM 八国联军打垮的是清政府，灭的了全中国人，灭的了中国这么多年的文化？他们最多只能分裂我们，躲在背后看中国人自己斗，然后他们捞得好油水，一个统一的中国才是他们的噩梦
说得真好，比较中肯客观的评价！
这是BBC 美国政府出台过专门的反华方案 西方媒体洗脑国民 一个反华的势力阵营 请一个所谓的专家 说一些好话 夹杂一些批评 明显的有问题
第一 美英是一个联盟 甚至以前是一个国家啊 这是他们的媒体 第二 这位专家说的明显傲慢偏颇片面 那里中肯客观
算了 讲道理是没有的 除非自己拥有批判性思维 同时追求真实本质 不然就只能用事实让人闭嘴 其他毫无意义 PS媒体的嘴 人们说的话并不是事实
看过傅先生写的邓小平时代写的很客观是外国政治家少有了解中国的一位学者
都说新疆集中营了，您还在这客观呢，您还反思自己呢？贱不贱啊？
@@飞鸟和蝉 没必要非黑即白，邓小平时代写得确实很好，很全面，如果想了解邓，确实是本好书。
@@飞鸟和蝉 并不是说不好听的都是假的，好的也要听，坏的也要听，它集中营我感觉程度没有那么大，或者可以叫改造营（看其它视频了解的，人数没那么多），两者性质不一样。比如中国有家医院给人挖器官买，人还能治，故意不治，哪个省我忘了，你百度能搜到，上新闻了。
搁那瞎扯什么东西？新疆本地人都没见过集中营，好家伙让你们看见了？做梦看见的吧，自己看看那些集中营的照片，还他么有学校，你是上个学都在被改造是吧，原始人吗？
@@飞鸟和蝉 老外的报道永远是报道恶的一点，大陆只是希望这些少数民族的人也能进行正常的工作，融入现代社会，担忧发生宗教极端的恶例，出发点是好的，但是一旦强制了，我就觉的很可怕。而且也不是什么集中营，大陆也说了叫再教育营。我去过新疆，和那边一个朋友也聊了聊，他也是说，其实政策很好，但是擅自去修改人家几千年的生活习惯确实让西方这些国家觉的不人道，我和他在天山那里转的时候，他就说人家老百姓多少代了住在山上，强行给人家赶下山，接受中文教育，安排工作，你要说好的话，那肯定对于国家发展以及防止宗教极端事件的发生是好事，而且对于他们更好的融入现代社会是好事，但是为了效率，下面工作人员素质又层次不齐，过程中难免会发生一些事情。BBC也去采访过啊，就是教育营啊，肯定会有一部分反抗激烈的应该被关的地方很隐蔽，BBC记者当时也是全程被跟踪没让他好好采访。至于说共产党还能像10年前基层执法很恶劣的那种情况现在应该是很少了，社会在进步的嘛，我不是小粉红也不是美分，客观的看待一些事情。欧美民主发展到今天其实社会撕裂已经变的很丑陋了，民主的本质是少数服从多数，多数尊重少数，但是他们为了政党利益，早就把后半句忘记了，但是你要说从创造力和思想层面的东西讲的话，那绝对是欧美国家厉害，因为两个字，自由。
其实不可能会有好评论，就像香港的媒体一样，控制媒体抹黑中国是不会改变的方向
你想怎麼？看央視吧。外國傳媒是不會認同中共的。央視也不會認同西方發達國家。
信息量很大！
Very good understanding of the issues👍👏
当年对苏联同样的说辞
麦卡锡主义再现
休克疗法就是哈佛给苏联的建议，苏联那些傻逼听了，所以苏联没了。
主要你们就是苏俄马列孙子啊
@@perotaccc8732 可是您连母亲都没有啊？
@@perotaccc8732 三民主义中的民生主义就是共产主义到底谁是马列子孙😏
已经是很友善和客观的建议了，甚至有些力度不够。结果评论区一群阴阳怪气各种维度的骂声，控评预算很厉害~
己所不欲 勿施于人。为什么只要求他人应对你进行更多的付出，却还要臆测别人的个中坏
我不认为这是一种很公平的谈话方式。
BBC完全不报道这些都是09年美国重返后，中国以及中国周边突然多了一系列冲突问题，完全不提菲律宾，越南在美国支持下调动跟中国的领土纠纷。但BBC作为英国国家支助媒体，代表的是英国立场，无可厚非。
@@留白-d4o 不仅是美国支持，还有澳大利亚、英国、法国和德国。菲律宾、越南也太少了，此外还有马来西亚、印尼。加油哦~
@@留白-d4o 其他所谓一系列周边冲突包括驻蒙大使怒怼蒙古前总统、台海危机、印藏边境危机，北朝鲜疫情期间对中国渔民的射杀。别漏了呀，声势浩大的四面楚歌不是盖的。
“When they are weak, it’s not an issue. Now they are strong, we have to treated fairly...”
Translation: “Only I can be strong, but not you. Otherwise, we have to be equal.” Does he means “when you week, I will let you take my advantage, which means I will give you money for free.”? So, you send money to other people in order to make them weak. I don’t understand the logic. interesting.
我觉得老先生讲的挺好的，挺客观地，大家不要因为中间一些片段断章取义地理解
屁股决定脑袋
He means “ Our police can use guns in USA but I need to blame you using spontoon . USA can send Army to another country but I need to blame you using your army in your country. We can earn money from you but your Economy cannot over me. How fair he said
He just mentioned right at the beginning that the trade surplus made on China side will finally create conflicts on countries’ relationship. I hope it’s not as complicated as you through.
I excepted to hear something new, but unfortunately what the expert said was just all I already knew.
You missed the point he addressed " China was Weak, but now China is Strong so we(USA) wants fair play." Where was this guy when USA was taking advantage of weak China.
Still speak from US prospective. I thought he will think more balance, but actually not.
jerryfish09 Why ? for the color of his skin?
非常好的访谈
黃皮白心！
他不在現場 就批評中國 虧待日本記者！
別有用心的評論！