Song ultralight aircraft motor glider from Melody Aircraft

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @pops9190
    @pops9190 8 років тому +29

    I like the way Dan always asks most of the real world Direct questions and doesn't let go until he gets the answer.

  • @captainpegs07
    @captainpegs07 4 роки тому +6

    Finally, something new in the part 103 zone!

  • @wk9531
    @wk9531 9 років тому +18

    Now there's a beautiful ultralight.

  • @Liberty4Ever
    @Liberty4Ever 4 роки тому +7

    I'd love one of these configurations in a two seat version with 50 gallon fuel capacity, a Rotax four stroke engine and a large Fowler flap to allow high speed efficient cruise but also low stall speed for grass strip operation.

  • @dorianeregalia7462
    @dorianeregalia7462 8 років тому +7

    Cool concept! I like the twin tail booms. Wish the gear cranked up but can't have everything eh.

  • @lucywucyyy
    @lucywucyyy 4 роки тому +5

    id really love to have one of these in electric

  • @jamesclark7248
    @jamesclark7248 4 роки тому +3

    Can anyone provide information on the current status and future plans for the Song aircraft and Melody Aircraft? Melody's web site is up, but does not appear to have been updated since 2016. I'd like to know if the aircraft is available, and whether there is a US representative.

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 5 років тому +4

    I had forgotten about this. A full part 103 plane. Not bad. Shame about the speed limit. I think they could relax that a bit if only they hold on to the stall speed. And maybe FAA could cobble together a video pilot's course of an hour or two that you can watch a couple of times so people are armed with understanding of relevant aircraft concepts and dangers. No test, just the education and recommendation that it's very good to know. Maybe rewatch it once a year. It's great to loosen some bureaucracy and costs but no reason pilots shouldn't know what they are doing. Video allows us free effective education these days. Can be just as good or better than exam of the past.

  • @fadi420420
    @fadi420420 10 років тому +1

    great stuff ...thanks for uploading.. how far it can fly single tank...and what is the wind or weather condition apply....THANKS

  • @freddiebowers1125
    @freddiebowers1125 10 років тому +2

    I think he thought Dan was from the FAA LOL! Great looking plane!

  • @bipolatelly9806
    @bipolatelly9806 8 років тому

    love your videos Dan! thanks.

  • @Aviator168
    @Aviator168 2 роки тому

    I would like to see a tricycle with same performance in tractor configuration. Hopefully lighter too.

  • @MrNopehaha
    @MrNopehaha 4 роки тому +2

    It's usually only old people that are in aviation, because it's the old people that can afford these very expensive aircraft, it's too bad us younger people can't get into this too.

  • @pomadom
    @pomadom 9 років тому +1

    Great stuff

  • @Rojasgeronimo
    @Rojasgeronimo 8 років тому

    Hello, I'll llike to do it for rc, could be a long range plane?

  • @rickravenrumney
    @rickravenrumney 9 років тому

    Nice looking bird. At least the "flying" wasn't CGI. But still have to ask-HOW MUCH?

    • @charlesbyrd3211
      @charlesbyrd3211 7 років тому

      $215,000

    • @rickravenrumney
      @rickravenrumney 7 років тому

      Charles Byrd
      Looks like the Challenger Line or Legacy Aircraft for me then!!!!
      Thank you Mr. Byrd.

    • @Ichibuns
      @Ichibuns 7 років тому +1

      It's only about $50k lol. Not bad for what it is. Especially with the carbon fiber

    • @MrSahansdal
      @MrSahansdal 7 років тому +3

      Have mine for $39K with enclosed trailer. judaswasjames[at]aol.com

  • @mzahirulislam68
    @mzahirulislam68 8 років тому +5

    what does it cost ?

    • @TheIntelligentView
      @TheIntelligentView 8 років тому

      He said in the video if you and your brothers below would have paid attention to the end!
      FIFTY GRAND

    • @douglasborgaro6801
      @douglasborgaro6801 7 років тому +1

      50 grand! Wow that's a lot of commitment in a hobby. Wish I knew something about flying.

    • @hymanocohann2698
      @hymanocohann2698 7 років тому +1

      Douglas Borgaro
      well now you know it"s
      expensive, build a old school air camper for economic, educational aircraft.

    • @justiceforsethrichwwg1wga160
      @justiceforsethrichwwg1wga160 6 років тому

      Douglas Borgaro
      Look into BeLite, Fisher or Hummel for awesome ultralights that are very affordable.

  • @HyperJoe
    @HyperJoe 7 років тому +1

    So this is pretty cool, and it's though I've seen it before. Is this not a Gas Powered version of the ElectraFlyer-ULS that I believe You Reviewed in an earlier Post. They look as though they are Twins? Is this the same Craft, same Company, it's definately the exact design as the Electric I've seen earlier. Am I wrong? Sure looks the same.. ;)

  • @mytubehkjt
    @mytubehkjt 10 років тому +2

    This looks exactly like a gas powered version of the Electra Flyer ULS.?.

  • @darticulate8751
    @darticulate8751 9 років тому +1

    NICE!

  • @icerinkdad
    @icerinkdad 10 років тому

    I like this!

  • @jasonplant5432
    @jasonplant5432 7 років тому

    Are you sure you can fly this without a liscense?

    • @cluelessbeekeeping1322
      @cluelessbeekeeping1322 4 роки тому

      The only things that matter are top speed & weight. It fits both. You can control the top speed by using a particular pitch on the prop (a climbing prop), the weight is ...well, the weight.

  • @twinturbo8304
    @twinturbo8304 6 років тому

    can you remove the wings for transport?

    • @slickrock1371
      @slickrock1371 4 роки тому +1

      He said they remove the wings to ship it to you.

  • @richardbowman7424
    @richardbowman7424 7 років тому +1

    Very nice aircraft. Your design looks identical to the Electro Flyer ULS except that airplane is fully electric. Which came first? Who copied who? I'm guessing the electric plane was based on your design and came after the Song because the airframe was ideal for the electric motor/battery pack installation. How many are sold and flying in the US? Are there any used models available? The $45K is still steep for some of us recreational flyers.

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 7 років тому

    I like sleek and efficient, not a fan of the price.
    It really should be possible to make minimal single seaters dirt cheap. But I guess the low stall speed UL requirements makes the construction more expensive. A shorter wing and higher speed would be easier.

  • @standazdenek2511
    @standazdenek2511 9 років тому +4

    Made in CZECH REPUBLIC

  • @TD402dd
    @TD402dd 8 років тому +2

    Probably the safest airplane ever built. Anything that glides allows the pilot to return to the earth without motor power. It is necessary for the new pilot to learn how to glide, which isn't that easy to learn.

    • @MrSahansdal
      @MrSahansdal 7 років тому

      That's why I bought one. But I ran into money trouble. Mine is #8. $39K with Polini and fixed prop, enclosed Polaris tandem wheels trailer. I brought it to CA from his place in Alberta. What I really want is his place, with airstrip. judaswasjames[at]aol.com

    • @slickrock1371
      @slickrock1371 4 роки тому

      That's why I'm interested in a motor glider; PPL prep as recommended by many pilots in these youtube videos.

    • @ericwhedlund728
      @ericwhedlund728 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrSahansdal you still flying your SONG?

  • @GregorKropotkin-qu2hp
    @GregorKropotkin-qu2hp 8 років тому

    I want one--£ How Much?

    • @MrSahansdal
      @MrSahansdal 7 років тому +1

      I have one for sale. $39K. judaswasjames[at]aol.com

  • @genesioapretto5077
    @genesioapretto5077 9 років тому

    COMPLIMENTI!

  • @HotMedic
    @HotMedic 10 років тому +4

    Looks like carbon-copy of Sadler Vampire.

  • @MrMontanaNights
    @MrMontanaNights 10 років тому

    Seems like a lot of plane for a FAR 103 compliant bird at less than 254 lbs empty. I bet its real expensive though being almost entirely carbon fiber...

    • @MrMontanaNights
      @MrMontanaNights 9 років тому +1

      Not bad for a brand new plane for sure. Up there with high grade competition gliders.

  • @bksbks496
    @bksbks496 8 років тому +1

    bad ass

  • @lachanga2457
    @lachanga2457 8 років тому

    i like one to buit one

  • @tomsoper5895
    @tomsoper5895 9 років тому

    my luck i'd hed fer da thunder heads luukie mama frums da 50000 feet up

  • @regdor8187
    @regdor8187 4 роки тому

    Great niche Aeroplane , good Luck finding a buyer spending way North of $15K for something
    with such limited use as an Ultralite.....

  • @aryantruth1807
    @aryantruth1807 6 років тому

    i guess if you consider 50 grand for a toy as no big deal. But I'd get bored with it like I did scuba diving......... a lot of hassle for the same experience over and over.

  • @bertmurillo1535
    @bertmurillo1535 3 роки тому

    for me is a waste of money you can not go any were
    except go around and around on top of the lanfing pasture

    • @ultralightnews
      @ultralightnews  3 роки тому +1

      Since I have flown from Ontario Canada to Lakeland Florida in an ultralight, (which is what this is) and know of several others that have done cross country flights I would have to disagree. While they aren't the fastest, they do make for very enjoyable flight time.

    • @Aviator168
      @Aviator168 2 роки тому +1

      @ber Murillo You have to understand that 20hp engine consumes less than 1 gallon of fuel per hour. With 5 gallons of fuel, the plane has a maximum range of 300 miles and than some. That's going distance for a lot of people.