How the Ottomans Defeated the Last Crusade - Nicopolis 1396 DOCUMENTARY

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 лип 2023
  • Big thanks to Ridge Wallet for sponsoring this video! Check out our favorite wallets here: ridge.com/kingsandgenerals Use Code “KINGSANDGENERALS” for 10% off your order
    Kings and Generals began remaking its animated historical documentary on the history of the Ottoman empire with the early rise of the Ottoman beylik under Osman I. In the first video we covered the early origins of the beylik, its status among the Muslim states in Anatolia and its early clashes against the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire at Bapheus and Dimbos in 1302 ( • Rise of the Ottoman Em... ). The second episode showed how a tiny beylik became a regional power with the continued battles against the Byzantine empire and other states, including the siege of Prusa (Bursa) between 1317 and 1326 and the battle of Pelekanon of 1329 ( • How the Ottomans Took ... ). As the Ottoman entered the Balkans, they had to face the Serbian Empire and the Second Bulgarian Empire, leading to the battles like Maritsa in 1371 ( • Maritsa 1371 - End of ... ). The Ottomans continued expanding both in Europe and Asia, leading to the conflicts with many states, including the Karamanids, culminating at the battle of Frenkyazisi in 1387 ( • Ottoman Expansion in A... ). As the Ottomans managed to defeat their enemies in Anatolia, they now had time to fight against the burgeoning Balkan alliance that formed against them with Lazar Hrebeljanovic of the Moravian Serbia at its head. His confrontation with the sultan Murad I would led to the battle of Kosovo in 1389 ( • Battle of Kosovo 1389 ... ). In the aftermath of Kosovo, Bayezid I takes the power and continues campaigns both in Anatolia and the Balkans. The events in Anatolia culminate at the battle of Kirdilim of 1391, where the Sultan defeats his Turkic opponents led by Kadi Burhaneddin. The Ottomans became the sultans of Rum getting the title of the Seljuks ( • How the Ottomans Becam... ). Afterwards the Sultan continued campaigning in Europe, leading to the first major Ottoman defeat at Rovine in 1395 against the Voivode of Wallachia, Mircea the Elder ( • First Major Ottoman De... ). Despite that, the Ottoman advance in Europe continued and to counter it, the king of Hungary Sigismund called a crusade joined by many nobles and retinues from the Balkans, France and beyond. This led to the so called Crusade of Nicopolis - the last major crusade and the battle of Nicopolis in 1396.
    Battle of Manzikert 1071 - • First Crusade: Battle ...
    Creation of the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum - • First Crusade: Partiti...
    Battle of Nicaea 1097 - • Princes' Crusade Begin...
    Battle of Dorylaeum 1097 - • Battle of Dorylaeum 10...
    Siege of Antioch 1097-98 - • Siege of Antioch 1097-...
    Sack of Constantinople 1204 - • Sack of Constantinople...
    Battle of Adrianople 1205 - • Battle of Adrianople 1...
    Battle of Klokotnitsa 1230 - • Battle of Klokotnitsa ...
    How the Romans Retook Constantinople - Pelagonia 1259: • How the Romans Retook ...
    What Was Lost in the Sack of Constantinople - • What Was Lost in the S...
    Third Crusade 1189-1192: From Hattin to Jaffa - • Third Crusade 1189-119...
    Medieval Battles - • Early Muslim Expansion...
    Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals or by joining the youtube membership: / @kingsandgenerals We are grateful to our patrons and sponsors, who made this video possible: docs.google.com/document/d/1o...
    The video was made by Ilhan Altunkaya, while the script was researched and written by Ege Güneş ( / ottomanhistoryhub . This video was narrated by Officially Devin ( / @offydgg & ua-cam.com/channels/79s.html.... The art was created by Nargiz Isaeva. Machinimas by MalayArcher on Total War: Attila engine.
    ✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/kingsand...
    ✔ Patreon ► / kingsandgenerals
    ✔ Podcast ► www.kingsandgenerals.net/podcast/
    ✔ PayPal ► paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
    ✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
    ✔ Facebook ► / kingsgenerals
    ✔ Instagram ► / kings_generals
    ✔ Discord ► / discord
    Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
    #Documentary #Ottomans #Crusade
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 933

  • @KingsandGenerals
    @KingsandGenerals  10 місяців тому +59

    Big thanks to Ridge Wallet for sponsoring this video! Check out our favorite wallets here: ridge.com/kingsandgenerals Use Code “KINGSANDGENERALS” for 10% off your order

    • @sadman1005
      @sadman1005 10 місяців тому +1

      Your map animation is just awesome! How do you make it?! Which software?!

    • @KingsandGenerals
      @KingsandGenerals  10 місяців тому +2

      @@sadman1005 After Effects

    • @AlejandroMartinezVelasco
      @AlejandroMartinezVelasco 10 місяців тому

      @@luqmanosman4508 You mean this one?: ua-cam.com/video/mZzaaORehzs/v-deo.html

    • @mohammadhadinosrati6788
      @mohammadhadinosrati6788 10 місяців тому

      Pls add persian sub to your videos 🩵

    • @CarlJancorda
      @CarlJancorda 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@KingsandGeneralsface reveal?

  • @gaborkelemen83
    @gaborkelemen83 10 місяців тому +321

    As hungarian child we were taught this in school. The most fantastic element in the whole Ottoman history for me was to see how Ottomans from Etrogul to Great Sulejman, which is ~250 years, only one generation was not a very highly talented leader, just talanted.
    In this period if you see any of Europes royal courts, its rare if there is 5 or 4 king who is equally highly talented in administration and warfere.

    • @sic7501
      @sic7501 10 місяців тому +11

      Agreed

    • @ilyaskus5613
      @ilyaskus5613 10 місяців тому +24

      Well absulutely ur right coz in that 250 years Ottomans had 8 marshal sultan !! They were not just Sultan but also great commander ! Sure Consuls of sultan also was intellegent !

    • @ahmedamr1684
      @ahmedamr1684 9 місяців тому

      I thought Hungarians hate the ottomans

    • @gaborkelemen83
      @gaborkelemen83 9 місяців тому

      @@ahmedamr1684 hungarians hate everyone, incuding other hungarians. 🤣😂its a bad habbit of most of us. But! You can think someone is great and still can hate it too. Maybe you should be hungarian to undarstand this?🤔

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto 9 місяців тому

      West europe was nothing then in global terms it gradual became. Byzantine empire was important and had decayed, and then Venice and Genoa only maybe one two other places had growing importance.
      Also what people dont say is that for the first 150 years maybe even 200 of Ottoman empire Greeks of Constantinople managed rhe administration of state which they knew how to do, before there is growing state culture in the Ottoman state.
      Ottoman empire was not that bad the first 100-150 years but after 1600 when there was drop of money all the very bad measures against Greeks and other Christians started.
      Greeks would have to give their children to anti christian propaganda military schools where they were taught to forget where they came from and hate the Greeks, the taxing became hugely high since no money around and only Christians could be taxed, the damaging to Christians measures started etc.

  • @12345sincara
    @12345sincara 10 місяців тому +595

    What a brave sultant to personally inform the garrison of his arrival at night. True thunderbolt!

    • @necrisro
      @necrisro 10 місяців тому +58

      A lot of the leaders back in the day took to the front lines, something you will never see today

    • @giorgijioshvili9713
      @giorgijioshvili9713 10 місяців тому +40

      ​@@necrisrobecause they would die instantly

    • @zee9709
      @zee9709 10 місяців тому +17

      @@giorgijioshvili9713 yeah, theres no sniper back then lol

    • @giorgijioshvili9713
      @giorgijioshvili9713 10 місяців тому +7

      @@zee9709 or drones tanks helicopters

    • @sic7501
      @sic7501 10 місяців тому +7

      ​@@giorgijioshvili9713haha yeah lol. Most leaders now hide in the bunker

  • @MunsterBeavis
    @MunsterBeavis 10 місяців тому +472

    I first heard about the Ottomans in school, briefly. When you learn about the Ottomans from strictly a WW1 context you miss out on all of their amazing history. Such a wonderful series you’ve made K&G!!! 👏

    • @TGeoMin
      @TGeoMin 10 місяців тому +1

      Except their conquests nothing impressive to learn about them. No civilization.

    • @sandrojones8068
      @sandrojones8068 10 місяців тому +10

      Demonic history

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому +19

      Pax Ottomana

    • @sandrojones8068
      @sandrojones8068 10 місяців тому +5

      @@richestmanintatooine7131 Latin again...

    • @resentfuldragon
      @resentfuldragon 10 місяців тому +60

      @@sandrojones8068 I disagree, they were far less brutal and abusive than most nations of their era, you see here how the catholics treated anyone including fellow christians who weren't on their side.
      The ottomans only really were mean in terms of the jannisary core early on, but later on most parents willingly gave their kids up to the core for a better life.
      There was also the armenian genocide, but it was the secularists who took over at that time, and other nations like britain and russia did bloodier genocides.

  • @omerfaruk6082
    @omerfaruk6082 6 місяців тому +51

    Sultan Bayezid the thunderbolt shouted in front of the castle of Niğbolu (Nicopolis) :
    - Bre Doğan, Bre Doğan! (hey, Doğan)
    Doğan Bey looked at the cavalry man outside and couldn't believe his eyes:
    - Buyur saadetlü hünkarım (Command me, my glorious sultan)
    - Halin nicedür? (How is your condition)
    Doğan bey briefly explained their situation
    Sultan Bayezid said:
    "Hold on, we have arrived to your aid" and turned his horse back.
    Some Hungarian patrols noticed the dark shadow in front of the castle and immediately started to follow him, but Sultan Bayezid had swiftly disappeared into the dark forest nearby.
    His language is a little different from today's modern Turkish but still understandable.

    • @aliatack19
      @aliatack19 2 місяці тому

      Clearly understandable

  • @elite968
    @elite968 10 місяців тому +312

    Imagine having the nickname *Thunderbolt* as an general.
    Pretty neat.

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому +13

      as a Sultan.

    • @elite968
      @elite968 10 місяців тому +15

      @@richestmanintatooine7131 A Sultan also can be a general...

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому +4

      @@elite968 Gazi.

    • @munteanuiulian7427
      @munteanuiulian7427 10 місяців тому +1

      And then imagine ending up in a small cage to be paraded.

    • @elite968
      @elite968 10 місяців тому +23

      @@munteanuiulian7427 That is just a myth made up by anti Ottoman guys, who didn't even see Timur's court once in their lifetime. They were obviously very butthurt, because of Bayazid embarrassing them in Europe.
      It has absolutely no historical substance.
      The two actual European witnesses, who were in Temerlane's court, Johan Schiltberger and Jean Le Maingre, wrote nothing about any humiliation at any sort.
      Although the humiliation of defeat, was probably hard enough for Bayazid.

  • @whywhat9018
    @whywhat9018 10 місяців тому +450

    Even though I'm Irish and not a Turk, I love Ottoman history. So thanks for posting this. They had a really powerful army and navy at one point in time. The Sultans commanded both fear and respect.

    • @malamatinas1
      @malamatinas1 10 місяців тому +22

      Yea sure they were feared and “respected” after they took your sons to be their soldiers and your pretty daughters for their harem’s. Cool stuff.

    • @HaloJumper7
      @HaloJumper7 10 місяців тому +47

      @@malamatinas1 those were only defeated enemies as Sultan Bayazid was married into the Serbian royalty and had Serbian Christian knights fighting against Tamerlane who also had Christian Armenian Knights as auxiliaries and the Ottoman Sultan's wife was taken as a slave and made to serve him in captivity which caused this Ottoman trauma and made them rely on Harem more to avoid shame. They did that to Muslims too from Syria to Egypt to Yemen etc and even among themselves when brothers fought over succession. Their vassals were generally left alone but it's still a brutal and fucked up imperialist system but pales in comparison to genocidal European settler colonialism Lebensraum (ethnic cleansing) which also happened in Northern Ireland, let alone other parts of the world.

    • @selimbakirhan
      @selimbakirhan 10 місяців тому +71

      @@malamatinas1Ottomans took those children and raised them to be either elite swordsman or generals, grand viziers etc. They grew up with sultan’s sons and were never mistreated. They were raised to be the most influental people in the empire. How is that considered cruel in 15th century?

    • @cagdas135
      @cagdas135 10 місяців тому +54

      @@malamatinas1 Yet Alexander was a hero, right? And the crusaders who massacred Oryahova's population in this video were civilized Europeans. Very selective about your "respect".

    • @arnstoff3212
      @arnstoff3212 10 місяців тому +24

      @@malamatinas1 Those devshirmes were treated far better than Turkish peasants and nobles. There is a reason for lack of Turkish nobles in the administration because most of the administration comprised of devshirmes. Even the merchants were non muslim mostly Greeks and Armenians while Turks worked in the fields and conscripted to die for Sultan's wars. OP is Irish he knows better about the time Abdulmajid helped the Irish during the Great Famine. However, you are right about harem thing and the slave trade.

  • @Germ_f
    @Germ_f 10 місяців тому +69

    Why is nobody talking about how "the Thunderbolt" is such a cool nickname

    • @dominicguye8058
      @dominicguye8058 8 місяців тому

      bro a lot of people have been both in this video and each video before that featured him

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +292

    Bayezid I was one of the fiercest Ottoman emperors with a dashing military record but the man who defeated the last Crusade (Varna 1444) was his grandson Murad II

    • @FreeMan-ev3jh
      @FreeMan-ev3jh 10 місяців тому +30

      The Polish King was killed in this battle. At this time there were even not a united Turkish state. Anatolia was divided in many small Turkish states. But the Ottomans still defeated many times in numbers superiour united European armies.

    • @nenenindonu
      @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +45

      ​@@FreeMan-ev3jhYeah the first 10 Ottoman rulers with the possible exception of Bayezid II were all excellent leaders, their accomplishments aren't surprising

    • @javohirotamurodiv4108
      @javohirotamurodiv4108 10 місяців тому +1

      The second battle of Kosovo 1448 I think

    • @TGeoMin
      @TGeoMin 10 місяців тому +2

      But no civilization.

    • @user-_37273
      @user-_37273 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@TGeoMin😂Europeans didn't even have toilets back then.

  • @SEQOO55
    @SEQOO55 5 місяців тому +37

    "Go and confront me with more allies and larger armies, so that the glory and victory I will gain will be greater!"
    - Bayezid I

    • @class1sportzers337
      @class1sportzers337 2 місяці тому

      When did he say that? Just curious

    • @SEQOO55
      @SEQOO55 2 місяці тому +1

      @@class1sportzers337 Before the Battle of Nicopolis

    • @Can-vl8sl
      @Can-vl8sl Місяць тому +1

      Bayezid the Thunderbolt

    • @animeszene
      @animeszene 11 днів тому

      ​@@Can-vl8slare you a muslim

  • @Tommykey07
    @Tommykey07 10 місяців тому +116

    Jean de Carrouge, who was played by Matt Damon in The Last Duel, was killed at Nicopolis.

    • @EM-tx3ly
      @EM-tx3ly 10 місяців тому +11

      His Last duel
      Literally

    • @halojen2
      @halojen2 10 місяців тому +2

      Thanks u gave me a good film advice. I have just watched it. Perfect film

    • @Kili2807
      @Kili2807 10 місяців тому

      @@halojen2historical equipment is pretty meh

    • @josenathanieltendencia245
      @josenathanieltendencia245 10 місяців тому

      Yes. I found out that was his last battle.

    • @EM-tx3ly
      @EM-tx3ly 10 місяців тому +10

      @@josenathanieltendencia245
      Turks were the better duelists I suppose

  • @bozkurtmidi_basbug
    @bozkurtmidi_basbug 10 місяців тому +94

    Greetings Sultan Bayezid The Thunderbolt 🇹🇷❤️

    • @AL_AFGHANI1
      @AL_AFGHANI1 10 місяців тому

      He was half Greek foolish Turkish nationalist

  • @calidone7661
    @calidone7661 10 місяців тому +52

    *Tale of the battle was told by Umur, son of Ottoman left wing commander Timurtaş, to prominent Turkish historian, Aşıkpaşazade. That's how we know the details (from Ottoman perspective)
    *Bayezid's second son, Mustafa played a critical role in Ottoman victory. He was the commander of units that flanked Franks
    *Most of the Franks were captured alive, according to Umur, only his father had captured 2000 knights.
    *Franks, despite fighting to an unfamiliar enemy in an unfamiliar territory, took no advice from those who had experience against Turks, which was critical.
    *Teutonic knights sacrified themselves to cover Sigismund's escape. Sigismund would become Holy Roman emperor later.
    *Bayezid personally charged with a great mace, as it was his custom.

  • @umerimran3833
    @umerimran3833 3 місяці тому +10

    Whole Europe vs Ottoman Crown👑

  • @gaplan7
    @gaplan7 10 місяців тому +103

    Europen All Stars VS Turks (Just Ottoman Turks)
    Btw, Turks wish even their enemies to be honorable. When Yıldırım Beyazıd heard about the Crusaders killing unarmed and defenseless civilians despite their promises, he became furious and went mad with anger. After the battle, he unleashed his wrath upon the wrongdoers like a volcanic eruption. His anger was so intense that even his own men pleaded with him to stop. (However, the Crusaders repeated the same mistake by breaking their word in the year 1444 and were punished again as a result)

    • @WERob-to5sp
      @WERob-to5sp 10 місяців тому +1

      Disinformation. Euro was fragmented. They had no all stars. Additionally, whitewashing Turkish history.

    • @thephoenix6673
      @thephoenix6673 10 місяців тому +39

      It's not a mistake, Crusaders were always like this, they massacred Jerusalem's population when they first took it, they burned Constantinople in 1204 after massacring the catholic population of Zara, the northern crusades weren't any less bloody.

    • @captanjames6765
      @captanjames6765 9 місяців тому

      Crusaders always Massacred Muslims Mans, Womens and Childrens whenever They Conquered but They were Always Spare by Muslims Leaders and kings like Saladin and many other Muslims kings, Also like King Alp Arslan Spared Emperor Romanus of Byzantine Empire

    • @captanjames6765
      @captanjames6765 9 місяців тому

      In One Chronicle Genghis Khan has Said he Learn Massacre by Crusaders

    • @user-tx8jj7dl2t
      @user-tx8jj7dl2t 9 місяців тому

      Source please? And where can I read more about this

  • @kwezicanca3698
    @kwezicanca3698 10 місяців тому +55

    Really love the Ottoman/ Crusader series. Much love from South Africa ❤

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +104

    Bayezid & Murad II were the top two figures of the late Crusades as were Nureddin Zengi & Baybars during the early classical Crusades, not to disrespect the other great Turkish rulers

    • @user-wr9dh6yv1o
      @user-wr9dh6yv1o 8 місяців тому

      ​@@julia2k8pretty

    • @Murat-du2op
      @Murat-du2op 8 місяців тому +5

      ​@@julia2k8 Are you aware that Mongolian and Turkish are different races? The Ottoman dynasty is a Turkish dynasty belonging to the Kayi tribe of the Oguz Turks. It has nothing to do with the Mongols. It is the Timurid Empire that is Mongol-Turkish.

    • @maxsterling9908
      @maxsterling9908 8 місяців тому +1

      You're absolutely correct on all count.

    • @Murat-du2op
      @Murat-du2op 7 місяців тому +3

      @@julia2k8 No, Turks and Mongolians are different races, Turks are white and Mongolians are yellow. And also, if the Turks were massacrers like the Mongols, the Ottoman Empire could have destroyed the whole of Europe when it dominated the world, or it could have made Turkish the official language of the whole of Europe, but none of these happened.

    • @C63V8
      @C63V8 6 місяців тому

      ​@@julia2k8none of you small people have fought mongols as much as turks have done, so I advice you to shut up and do some more reading

  • @a.ricole4081
    @a.ricole4081 10 місяців тому +313

    I wonder how Sigismund survived the headache Franco-Burgundians mustve caused as they trolled throughout the entire campaign. Would've been interesting to see how the battle would've turned out if they just listened to Sigismund's advice.

    • @jesseberg3271
      @jesseberg3271 10 місяців тому +55

      You do have to worry about the principle of "The winners write the history" in situations like this. Although "survivors" may be more accurate than "winners" in Sigismund's case. He did survive to tell his version of events, whereas many of the Franco-Burgundians didn't.
      Still, if he was shading things to make himself look better and the westerners look worse, he did a very thorough and believable job of it.

    • @a.ricole4081
      @a.ricole4081 10 місяців тому +46

      ​@jesseberg3271 kings and generals is known for delivering informations in neutral view points. The channel often mentions both perspectives. For example, in the previous video, kings and generals mention both sources that claims how Cleon died(he was killed as he ran away, or he fought bravely until his end)
      Also, kings and generals probably analyzed the Ottomans' records and cross validated it by comparing them to european sources before making video

    • @hydrolifetech7911
      @hydrolifetech7911 10 місяців тому +64

      ​@@jesseberg3271Franco-Burgundian nobles ransomed off survived so if there was any conflicting narrative it would have been recorded.

    • @SC-jq9og
      @SC-jq9og 10 місяців тому +6

      Would've been interesting to see how the battle would've turned out if the balkaners kept up with the french

    • @albertofrankdiaz6664
      @albertofrankdiaz6664 10 місяців тому +4

      ​@@jesseberg3271"winners write the history" work for ancient times were no other record is avaible. That line was utter butchered now

  • @viscondedeitavera
    @viscondedeitavera 10 місяців тому +140

    The THUNDERBOLT was mighty, brave, swift, and just; but Varna 1444 was the Last Crusade of Europeans against the Empire (under Murad II), not Nicopolis 1396. Varna is one of the great epic battles of history, please make a documentary of Varna 1444 as well

    • @2.mehmedhan
      @2.mehmedhan 9 місяців тому +2

      Hayır son haçlı seferi 1448 2.kosova savaşıdır

    • @DarkAlan2
      @DarkAlan2 9 місяців тому +1

      I was looking in the comments to see if anyone mentioned 'thunderbold' was defeated and placed in a cage later. Nobody here knows history, you're all clowns just like the "thunderbolt" lmao. He wrote Emir Timur's name in small letters while writing his own with gold, then got his whole empire destroyed and he was caged like an animal. History lesson there for you clowns and overly excited tiktok kids

    • @jonahkristiansen5301
      @jonahkristiansen5301 9 місяців тому +21

      @@DarkAlan2 What an ydyot... Beyazid and Timur competed for the leadership of the Turkish world, Beyazid almost won against a much larger army, and was never put in a cage this has been proven a myth, he lived in a huge royal home. I know this much and I'm from Chile. You know zero.

    • @fatihveyselnurcin
      @fatihveyselnurcin 9 місяців тому +15

      @@DarkAlan2 Well, he dared to do that. Timur never lost a war. He was certainly on another level. Yet, Beyazıd the thunderbolt dared to show courage. So, what are you encouraging here? Cowardice? Well, do it yourself then

    • @EmperorNapoleon1815
      @EmperorNapoleon1815 8 місяців тому +15

      @@DarkAlan2Tamerlane built an empire that died with him. The Ottoman Sultans built a larger empire that lasted over 600 years. He cannot hold a candle to their success.

  • @msc7594
    @msc7594 10 місяців тому +104

    A lot of people are bringing up Tamerlane as if he was some magical counter to Bayezid, Tamerlane had to bribe the Anatolian Turkic clans that formed Bayezids flanks (and he outnumbered Bayezid by 20-40 thousand men before Bayezid was betrayed) to even have a shot at victory. The thunderbolt nearly beat tamerlane if only a large portion of, ironically, his Turkish auxiliary armies hadn’t defected over to Tamerlane. The man was one of the greatest Ottoman Sultans and perhaps warrior king of his age. His bad luck was in trusting the Turkish tribes that he and his father had recently subjugated in not holding a grudge against him. Even more amazing was that the Ottomans were able to have an 11 year battle royale after Timur and still rebuild their Empire even faster and more effectively afterwards. Such defeats and civil wars destroyed many other more powerful states. At this point the Ottomans were still over 250 years away from the height of their power. Truly the Inheritors of Rome.

    • @CrimeanHorseArcher
      @CrimeanHorseArcher 10 місяців тому

      Seeing the military strength and states organization, hosting so many folks within it Ottomans were the true inheritants of Rome, yes.

    • @safatkarim630
      @safatkarim630 10 місяців тому +4

      Kayser I Rum❤

    • @timeread3099
      @timeread3099 9 місяців тому

      Tamerlane was just a genghis khan wannabe. Just look at how fast his empire collapsed after him. He was a flop and so were his descendants.

    • @overpredor3412
      @overpredor3412 9 місяців тому +2

      Ottomans lost 50 years of advance bcz of tamerlane and its a biggest loss

    • @ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273
      @ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273 9 місяців тому +8

      Turks are warriors
      The only to defeat the turks are the turks
      Huge respect to all turkic tribes since Göktürk
      🫡🇲🇷❤️🇹🇷🇺🇿

  • @KHK001
    @KHK001 10 місяців тому +63

    Yes! more Ottoman wars love this series!

  • @christopherg2347
    @christopherg2347 10 місяців тому +18

    "Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory" - favourite frankish pasttime.
    Doesn't mater how good you are at charging and how many battles you win. If you get to prideful and outrun your own support, you die and loose the battle.

    • @weedwizard7906
      @weedwizard7906 5 місяців тому

      Absolutely baffling how often they repeated the same mistake.

    • @Gimmegames4free6942
      @Gimmegames4free6942 5 днів тому +1

      Common french L. Damn shame Sigismund lost. The first lesson a soldier's learns is discipline and they have none facepalm

  • @deron2203
    @deron2203 10 місяців тому +140

    Man this series is just one of if not my favorite right now! The new redone battles are such an improvement over the old ones! Good job Kings and Generals!

  • @knotgifos
    @knotgifos 10 місяців тому +30

    Beyazid I is known as Yıldırım (Lightening) Beyazid because of his speed of joining and winning this war.
    Edit: As @samettavsancoglu7646 pointed out, Bayezid actually recieved his title of "Yıldırım" in an earlier battle of Frenkyazisi against Karamanids.

    • @samettavsancoglu7646
      @samettavsancoglu7646 8 місяців тому

      Alakasi yok. Sultan Murad döneminde Bayezid şehzadeyken Karaman'lilar ile yapilan Frenkyazisi savasinda aldi o unvanı

    • @knotgifos
      @knotgifos 8 місяців тому +1

      Niğbolu olarak biliyordum ancak dediğiniz gibiymiş. Unvanının hakkını vermiş o zaman en azından. Düzeltme için teşekkürler.

    • @samettavsancoglu7646
      @samettavsancoglu7646 8 місяців тому

      @@knotgifos rica ederim. Harp Tarihi kanalında detayli bir video var Frenkyazisi Muharebesi ile ilgili tavsiye ederim

    • @yusufemreyldrm346
      @yusufemreyldrm346 6 місяців тому

      lighting şimşek demek

    • @samettavsancoglu7646
      @samettavsancoglu7646 6 місяців тому +1

      @@yusufemreyldrm346 evet Bayezid the Thunderbolt olmaliydi

  • @ShahQajar
    @ShahQajar 10 місяців тому +204

    The great historian Ibn Khaldun also argues in his “Introduction to History” (or The Muqaddimah) that nomadic peoples, the Turks foremost among them, were the most energetic and martial of peoples and that imperial dynasties and regimes emerged from such groups until they became corrupted and softened by civilization and luxury, which resulted in a loss of martial energy and group solidarity. This analysis is very true because as the Abbasid caliphate started to lose its power and influence in the mid-ninth century most of the dynasties that emerged to control the various regions of the Muslim world were founded by Turks, either tribal nomads or former slave soldiers. Ibn Khaldun even attributes the victory of the Muslims over the Mongols to the martial power and energy of the Turks, who formed the elite ranks of the Mamluk armies that defeated the Mongols on several occasions as they attempted to advance into Syria and Egypt between 1260 and 1323.

    • @AmirSatt
      @AmirSatt 10 місяців тому

      this is scourge of every monarchy. Usually it begins with strong ruler but as time goes it gets corrupted to the point of decadance and weakness (if it has no wars)

    • @se20558
      @se20558 10 місяців тому +10

      The bulk of the Mamluk army were basically native Egyptians, not Turks. And in the Muslim world (actually in the history of the world), physically the strongest warriors were the Rashidun Arab Muslims, no Turkic fighter doesn't even stand a chance against those superhuman fighters. Some of these names are enough, Ali Ibn Abi Talib, Dharrar Ibn Al Azwar, Khalid bin Waleed, Al Qaqa ibn Amr, etc. They alone can take down armies.

    • @Mehmet68
      @Mehmet68 10 місяців тому +40

      @@se20558ı think you need more search about mamluk army and Türk army history. Mamluk’s army include mostly Türk and Cherkes warrior. Arabs is neither soldiers nor Warriors

    • @se20558
      @se20558 10 місяців тому

      @@Mehmet68 and I think you need more history lesson apart from your fake turkish ones, it's well recorded that the bulk of the Mamluk army is Egyptian where Turks and others consisted only a small portion, otherwise, logically it wouldn't be possible to sustain an army for few centuries. Coming to whether the Arabs are warriors/soldiers or not, go read the last four names of my comment again, only those names are enough to make the best Turkic fighter piss his pants. The coward Turks barely fight any war when they are outnumbered, while the Rashidun Arab Muslims defeated two superpowers while being 5 to 1 outnumbered.

    • @silviuvisan505
      @silviuvisan505 10 місяців тому +24

      Gotta love muslim infighting. Turks are known to be proud because their medieval empire and they cling on that nationalism. And the other guy thinks one guy can take on entire armies. Bollywood much?

  • @justsefa1843
    @justsefa1843 10 місяців тому +90

    "We must defeat the evil Ottomans that oppress our poor christian brothers and sisters!"
    *Goes and kills everyone, muslims and christians alike.

    • @Khattab511
      @Khattab511 10 місяців тому +15

      May Allah bless Bayezid the thunderbolt for massacring tens of thousands crusaders. They don’t deserve to be spared

    • @ikman3410
      @ikman3410 10 місяців тому +3

      @@Khattab511 He should have wiped out entire crusader army and killed them in the river. But they fled as cowards.

    • @emre30489
      @emre30489 9 місяців тому +1

      thats little bit extrreme

    • @ikman3410
      @ikman3410 9 місяців тому +1

      @@emre30489 That is what the crusaders did many times to Muslims after victory.

    • @squeaky206
      @squeaky206 9 місяців тому +6

      ​@@emre30489Not as extreme as basically the entire Fourth Crusade (crusaders sacked the CATHOLIC city of Zara and went on to ruin Constantinople for 57 years until liberation)

  • @agustinsilvaramirez5104
    @agustinsilvaramirez5104 9 місяців тому +1

    Thank you so much. I LOVE this Serie. Please, load the next episode soon. I am eager to see the rest of Bayezid's reign.

  • @Thenoisyoneyes
    @Thenoisyoneyes 10 місяців тому +114

    The new colour scheme and graphics are excellent, and the marks on the unite indicating their toughness is a great aid in understanding the nature of the battle.

    • @bashirabdulghaniy
      @bashirabdulghaniy 10 місяців тому +4

      Amazing username.

    • @Thenoisyoneyes
      @Thenoisyoneyes 10 місяців тому +4

      @@bashirabdulghaniy thanks ahaha

    • @Suleimenoff
      @Suleimenoff 10 місяців тому

      A way from Total War series to indicate veteran status of unites )

    • @resentfuldragon
      @resentfuldragon 10 місяців тому

      @@Suleimenoff That would be cool if total war changed the color of units to represent veterancy, currently chevrons are the only distinction.

  • @archanarajan7086
    @archanarajan7086 10 місяців тому +142

    I like the shade of blue you have used for the French units. You should use that shade to represent them

    • @archanarajan7086
      @archanarajan7086 10 місяців тому +2

      @kristianosbourn2428 I agree, people always remember their greatest defeats like Agincourt and Waterloo. Very few remember their victories and efforts. In the Italian Wars they held out while surrounded from all sides geographically and came out tin a strong position. It is sad.

  • @Seloading
    @Seloading 6 місяців тому +1

    Your map editing looks so cool pls share it with other channels

  • @Liquidsback
    @Liquidsback 10 місяців тому +55

    Crusaders: Deus Vult
    Ottomans: What was that?
    Crusaders: Deus abandonded.

    • @EM-tx3ly
      @EM-tx3ly 10 місяців тому +4

      Ottomans: Then convert to Islam
      Jannisaries: YES

    • @alkasah4softs129
      @alkasah4softs129 10 місяців тому +1

      😂

  • @Jon_the_Apostate
    @Jon_the_Apostate 10 місяців тому +31

    Thank you for continuing the Ottoman series. I thought you won't continue it and because of it, I was dismayed.

  • @hendersongriffith3990
    @hendersongriffith3990 10 місяців тому +20

    To think he turned the battle around. Very quick thinking, critical really. Long live Bayezid👍

  • @jonbaxter2254
    @jonbaxter2254 10 місяців тому +1

    Been waiting for this one...

  • @shehansenanayaka3046
    @shehansenanayaka3046 9 місяців тому +3

    Battle of nicopolis one of the greatest battles ever. It led the tone to ottomans to enter hungary and conqueror it. What a series. I love your all series. This is awesome. Love from Sri Lanka ❤️🔥..

  • @balrawg5990
    @balrawg5990 10 місяців тому +22

    Wasn't the Last Crusade (also defeated by the Ottomans) in 1444?

  • @satiroglu44
    @satiroglu44 6 місяців тому +2

    He was known by moving the army fast and being quite responsive and decisive. That's why he was called the thunderbolt.
    But that caused him to lose against Timur, he led the army far east into the Anatolia where Timur has moved through west thus he had to pull the army back with tired/weary horses and infantry.

  • @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus
    @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus 10 місяців тому +14

    Actually the campaign of Varna was the last crusade

    • @CouchTomato87
      @CouchTomato87 10 місяців тому

      Actually it was when Nazis were looking for the Holy Grail. A movie taught me this.

    • @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus
      @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus 9 місяців тому

      @@CouchTomato87 your comment is *brilliant* *cough* you know?
      In 1443 Eugene IV issued a crusading bull to which Władysław III responded and marched on the Ottomans, just as Sigismund did.

  • @gokmenaktas2169
    @gokmenaktas2169 10 місяців тому +5

    amazing piece of work. I am Turkish and I can say that this war as we call it "Nigbolu" was incderibly and mesmerisingly presented and told by you. Thank you for the best efforts, it was a pleasure watching this.

  • @catalyst772
    @catalyst772 10 місяців тому +20

    Wasn't Varna the last Crusade?

  • @nawafXjohn
    @nawafXjohn 9 місяців тому +4

    Crossing of the Danube should be more of a war reference than crossing the rubicon

  • @TheSilentStrikez
    @TheSilentStrikez 2 місяці тому +1

    It's quite surprising to me that, having read both scripts of this confrontation, this particular version comes across as rather blunt in numerous aspects. While the video is well-made, it falls short when it comes to accuracy. It always amazes me how in the West, there's often an attempt to soften the impact of defeat.

  • @mikemodugno5879
    @mikemodugno5879 10 місяців тому +61

    I'm currently reading Roger Crowley's book 1453. This video was an awesome suplement for learning about the fall of Constantinople. Thank you.

    • @hydrolifetech7911
      @hydrolifetech7911 10 місяців тому +9

      It didn't fall. It was captured.

    • @themoon3588
      @themoon3588 10 місяців тому +14

      ​@@hydrolifetech7911same thing mate

    • @smavi4133
      @smavi4133 10 місяців тому +10

      @@hydrolifetech7911hilarious mental gymnastics.

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому

      @@smavi4133 You common folk won't get it xD

    • @smavi4133
      @smavi4133 10 місяців тому

      @@richestmanintatooine7131 hilarious mental gymnastics.

  • @ozkanboyraz7626
    @ozkanboyraz7626 10 місяців тому +4

    Awesome video, please continue. I am waiting for the next episode

  • @bilgetonyukuk6179
    @bilgetonyukuk6179 9 місяців тому +15

    After the Turks emerged victorious from the battlefield, Sultan Beyazit addressed the noble captives as follows; Go and meet me with more allies and bigger armies, so that the glory and the glory that I will gain will be even greater!

  • @hassaanalisiddiqui3827
    @hassaanalisiddiqui3827 9 місяців тому +1

    I would love to see a video on the siege of nagykaniza

  • @qamarahmad1432
    @qamarahmad1432 10 місяців тому +13

    Is it right to call Nicopolis as last crusade wasn't Varna the last crusade ?

  • @muhammadfaiqawan5544
    @muhammadfaiqawan5544 6 місяців тому +13

    Turks lives in our hearts 🥰
    Love from Pakistan to our brave Turks brother and to great ottoman empire (usmania saltanat)🇵🇰♥️🇹🇷

  • @bobsemple262
    @bobsemple262 9 місяців тому +5

    Of all the ottoman sultans, bayezid stick out the most to me simply because of "the thunderbolt" nickname

    • @eaxu
      @eaxu 8 місяців тому

      What about Mehmed the Conqueror, Suleiman the Magnificent or Selim the grim.

    • @sergius9499
      @sergius9499 7 місяців тому +1

      selim the tuborg

  • @liberalgoodi
    @liberalgoodi 10 місяців тому

    Thanks

  • @AironSmieciowy-di3qy
    @AironSmieciowy-di3qy 10 місяців тому

    Great video!

  • @elifelgun9996
    @elifelgun9996 8 місяців тому +9

    Love and respect my ancestors Ottomans i miss you so much love from Türkiye 🇹🇷❤️

  • @loupiscanis9449
    @loupiscanis9449 10 місяців тому +4

    Thank you , K&G .
    🐺 Loupis Canis .

  • @md.shamiurrahman7110
    @md.shamiurrahman7110 9 місяців тому

    Next please ASAP....

  • @-RONNIE
    @-RONNIE 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for the information in this video good work

  • @CrimeanHorseArcher
    @CrimeanHorseArcher 10 місяців тому +4

    What an improvement on the quality. An epic story. It was so sharp for both sides, all or nothing for both parties.

  • @WOLF36554
    @WOLF36554 10 місяців тому +14

    Hurray!!! Another video on the Ottomans. I was afraid this serie was canceled

  • @mistertok1
    @mistertok1 10 місяців тому

    Awesome video!

  • @fardinsinstructions2955
    @fardinsinstructions2955 9 місяців тому +1

    Bro, please upload these Ottoman empire episodes fast..

  • @mkbijnaam8713
    @mkbijnaam8713 9 місяців тому +9

    In my history books at school when i was younger they only mentioned Muslims . Like the books fullout refused to mention the Ottomans it was just called the Muslims . Never did the books mention how great the Turks where upuntil they became the sick man of Europe . My history books loved to mention that . Thanks for making these great video's

  • @birisi4345
    @birisi4345 10 місяців тому +5

    O love your channel and your videos but some wrong informations about Ottoman army you mentioned in video.
    1- Akıncıs ( you can translate as raiders) not frontal units. They use hit and tactics and never charge frontal assault. İn this battle for example they lure frankish knights and seperate from their main forces.
    2- tımarlı sipahis were not heavy cavalry they were light cav.

  • @sassythesasquatch6847
    @sassythesasquatch6847 10 місяців тому +5

    I like the remaster of this video adding even more info than the one 4 years ago in addition to improved quality

  • @jonbaxter2254
    @jonbaxter2254 10 місяців тому

    Here it is!

  • @joaomarcelo7708
    @joaomarcelo7708 10 місяців тому +14

    Did the french really think that they alone could just bulldoze through the ottoman army? Heavy cavalry is powerful, but this is just arrogance.

    • @KingsandGenerals
      @KingsandGenerals  10 місяців тому +23

      Think from their pov. People who were raised on the stories of the First Crusade, where, at times, a handful of heavy knights were able to turn the battle against the "nomads". Mircea and other locals tried to explain that the Ottomans were not your usual nomadic light cavalry, but to no avail.

    • @joaomarcelo7708
      @joaomarcelo7708 10 місяців тому +2

      @@KingsandGenerals I see, yeah from their pov it makes sense. I still think that what they did was inexcusable though.

    • @ufukakbulut2362
      @ufukakbulut2362 10 місяців тому

      ​@@joaomarcelo7708şuan onlar ve kendilerini yenen Türklerin hepsi ölü. Artık hepsi eşit ve kardeşler. Bundan 6 Asır önce neden savaştıklarını bile bilmeyen insanlara kızmaya gerek yok.

  • @farazaltaf1421
    @farazaltaf1421 10 місяців тому +3

    Thanks man, i was waiting for the Nicopolis Bayazid's greatest victory

  • @4sakenreaper42
    @4sakenreaper42 10 місяців тому

    Great video

  • @calidone7661
    @calidone7661 10 місяців тому

    excellent

  • @bluefishexports4253
    @bluefishexports4253 8 місяців тому +5

    Yet again muslims successfully crushed the Christian serpent

  • @BigXist
    @BigXist 9 місяців тому +12

    respect to the serbian Vassal, he was loyal friend on his time

    • @sayncevizoglu1057
      @sayncevizoglu1057 5 місяців тому +3

      they were indeed loyal and valiant fighters. they fought beside Bayezid in the battle of Ankara against Timur's deadly army.
      and they say, when Timur was nearly victorious and saw those knights fighting very bravely in a lost battle, he ordered his army to open an escape way for the knights because of his respect for them.

  • @derpycat9347
    @derpycat9347 9 місяців тому +1

    Crusader Kings 2 Song was nice

  • @albertgreene313
    @albertgreene313 10 місяців тому +1

    This vid got me hungry for kcd2

  • @kumebannerlord
    @kumebannerlord 10 місяців тому +4

    Thank you for doing medieval videos again. I hope to see more

  • @vos3373
    @vos3373 10 місяців тому

    Glad u re did this yall

  • @scourgeofgodattila579
    @scourgeofgodattila579 10 місяців тому +33

    The last Crusaders were Varna, not Nicopolis.

    • @ozdemirozkanoz7315
      @ozdemirozkanoz7315 10 місяців тому +14

      You can say malta,lepanto or even mezokerestes were a crusade. You wont be wrong but nicopolis was the last time all christendom united. Varna was mostly eastern europa and italian city states

    • @shehryarashraf5840
      @shehryarashraf5840 10 місяців тому +2

      i've seen people saying the crimean war was the last crusade

    • @ozdemirozkanoz7315
      @ozdemirozkanoz7315 10 місяців тому +1

      @@shehryarashraf5840 true, both france and russia claimed themselves for being protector of christians living in ottoman territory and fought for it. so it makes sense

    • @squeaky206
      @squeaky206 9 місяців тому

      ​@@ozdemirozkanoz7315Crimea was fought on Russian territory, for the control of Christians in the Empire (which both empires couldn't give two shits about). Not on Ottoman territory for the liberation of those Christians living in the realm of Abdulmejid. The last "crusade" of any kind was the 1683-1699 Turkish War.

    • @ozdemirozkanoz7315
      @ozdemirozkanoz7315 9 місяців тому

      @@squeaky206 when i was thinking for what is the last crusade great turkish war came to my mind aswell but the point is its hard to pick. When all arabs fighting against isreal they were thinking this is the latest crusade they should stand against. Isreal had been put in holy lands by western power so it made sense too

  • @awaismalik5012
    @awaismalik5012 10 місяців тому

    Waiting for the next videos like this

  • @varun_MRG
    @varun_MRG 9 місяців тому +2

    Is there one battle in which the French cavalry do not charge head on to defeat. Seen this at Crecy, Poitiers, Agincourt, Waterloo?

  • @shamsuddinahmmad3934
    @shamsuddinahmmad3934 9 місяців тому +4

    Ottoman, The Lone Wolf ✨

  • @Poompingtokmaking
    @Poompingtokmaking 10 місяців тому +25

    In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.

    • @sandrojones8068
      @sandrojones8068 10 місяців тому +2

      In short, the very Alphabet you wrote this in, is from the other group that you can't think about..
      The whole world was made/influenced by the Romans and their offshoots.
      One may also argue that world history began with Ancient Europeans such as Greeks and one of their offshoots- The Romans.
      The contemporary World Countries that have some connections to Ancient Rome cover almost the entirety of the globe.

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому +1

      Turks are the catalyst

    • @sandrojones8068
      @sandrojones8068 10 місяців тому +1

      @@richestmanintatooine7131 Turds are the shat

    • @giorgijioshvili9713
      @giorgijioshvili9713 10 місяців тому +2

      Turks were nomads they didnt influeneced anything only conquered and got influeneced by the cultures they conquered

    • @richestmanintatooine7131
      @richestmanintatooine7131 10 місяців тому +3

      @@giorgijioshvili9713 back to school xD

  • @alieneskutanoglu8673
    @alieneskutanoglu8673 9 місяців тому

    Turkish subtitle please... I like this channel

  • @oriffel
    @oriffel 10 місяців тому +2

    those map effects are gettin fancy

  • @BlancoGoneWild
    @BlancoGoneWild 10 місяців тому +7

    This is for far one of your best series, cant't wait to see the next episodes

  • @hesoyam97320
    @hesoyam97320 8 місяців тому +4

    1v20. Even ottoman wins. I love Ottoman

  • @supremesage7679
    @supremesage7679 10 місяців тому

    Thank you !

  • @roihanfadhil2879
    @roihanfadhil2879 10 місяців тому +2

    Amazing Graphics and Good Story👍👌.

  • @chromsh2806
    @chromsh2806 10 місяців тому +70

    If i had a nickel for every time a crusade failed due to the vanity and ignorance of its participants.... I'd have so, so many nickels

    • @felixbabuf5726
      @felixbabuf5726 10 місяців тому +2

      I'd be able to pay for university from my own income if I had that many nickels

    • @gorilladisco9108
      @gorilladisco9108 10 місяців тому +1

      I think you'll have a dime, give or take. It's not like they sent crusader every month back then.

    • @DungeonDweller-du4gv
      @DungeonDweller-du4gv 10 місяців тому +1

      @@AI-uk1ct but the op didnt talk about caliphates at all tho? they only discussed crusades so no need to get insecure lmao. Also yes caliphates had that too but it was more in the crusades

    • @makeytgreatagain6256
      @makeytgreatagain6256 10 місяців тому

      @@DungeonDweller-du4gvmakes sense as the Islamic world was more United than the Christian one. Most Europeans didn’t even view eachothers as the same or on equal standing. The Islamic world viewd all Arabs as equal as and those who were lesser were more unified. A good example of this can be seen with how crusader armies had multiple languages etc meanwhile all Islamic kingdoms in the Middle East and North Africa could communicate in Arabic, sure some minorities like Berbers and Turks were oppressed and even overlooked often the fact is they had a more cohesive concept of unity compared to the Europeans at the time hence why there was more fractures in the crusader armies than Islamic ones

    • @ikielinsesi1843
      @ikielinsesi1843 10 місяців тому +1

      It's how your Christian historians depict it. In their eyes Muslims or Turks can't beat them otherwise.

  • @muhtesem1946
    @muhtesem1946 10 місяців тому +4

    Visiting your channel everyday since last two months for this masterpiece

  • @mohammadbilal4473
    @mohammadbilal4473 10 місяців тому +2

    Please make a video on the ottoman civil war which occured after timur's invasion

  • @cengizsogutlu
    @cengizsogutlu 10 місяців тому

    my favorite

  • @Yugioh_Turk
    @Yugioh_Turk 10 місяців тому +4

    Those Franko-Burgandians are the real Leeroy Jenkins

  • @adrianadios5041
    @adrianadios5041 9 місяців тому +3

    The final crusade was stupid just like the other ones. Too many leaders in one place, they never listened to each other and were only there for personal glory.

  • @davidi6773
    @davidi6773 2 місяці тому

    This is like a modern version of sending just MBT without infantry

  • @SirDrFish
    @SirDrFish 9 місяців тому +1

    Philip of Artois must have been an ancestor of Leeroy Jenkins

  • @matheusrondelleite8015
    @matheusrondelleite8015 10 місяців тому +6

    I love you guys when you use CK2 music 😂❤

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 10 місяців тому +35

    The internal conflicts of the Crusaders played nearly as big a role in their defeat as Bayezid's military leadership. This battle is an interesting case study of what can help lead to victory or defeat.

    • @CrustyCheese1991
      @CrustyCheese1991 10 місяців тому +20

      In every episodes regarding the Ottomans, there is always an "excuse" why the european forces lost an battle because most of the sources from this channel are mainly european ones.

    • @CrustyCheese1991
      @CrustyCheese1991 10 місяців тому +4

      @@realDanielAugustine of course thats reasonable but i didnt exaggerate when i said in every major battle the ottomans fought against europeans there was an excuse. Just watch some battles back to back and you will see it. i can see it if it happens half the time but its almost 100% of the time.

    • @rockinflemingo3075
      @rockinflemingo3075 10 місяців тому +9

      @@AI-uk1ct Most of those european empires would also not see the next two decades, Ottomans Atleast lived long enough

    • @CrustyCheese1991
      @CrustyCheese1991 10 місяців тому +3

      @@realDanielAugustine i never said that this channel does it intentional but if you use mainly sources from just one side a little bit of bias cmes with it.

    • @CrustyCheese1991
      @CrustyCheese1991 10 місяців тому +3

      @@laonch6073 Please explain what you mean with better trained, equipped and advanced armies. To my knowledge the Ottomans were the most advanced power in europe atleast from 14th to the 16th century before their steady decline started.

  • @dlugi4198
    @dlugi4198 9 місяців тому +2

    It seems to be the pattern that almost every crusade was lost by stupidity of French, who didn't want to lose their glory, but ended up finding shame in death.

  • @SKa-tt9nm
    @SKa-tt9nm 10 місяців тому +7

    The end of the Second Bulgarian Empire 😢

  • @Isildun9
    @Isildun9 10 місяців тому +17

    Fun Fact: one of the French casualties of this battle was a knight named Jean de Carrouges. This was the same knight who fought a trial by combat against the squire Jacques Lesgris over his alleged assault and rape of Carrouges' wife Marguerite ten years before this.

    • @Isildun9
      @Isildun9 10 місяців тому +1

      @@jadhussein8412 it was a holdover from the days of the pagan Germanic tribes that destroyed and filled in the Western Roman Empire, before they became Christianized. The Church had been trying to stamp the tradition out for a long time, and while it was still a legal option z it was only invoked in circumstances where the evidence was insufficient to decide the trial, and if both parties agreed to it.

    • @Isildun9
      @Isildun9 10 місяців тому +1

      @@ryojs4286 perhaps. I'm not an expert on ancient and medieval laws and such, only citing from my own amateur research. The reasons behind it's use may be incorrect in how I presented them, but the origins with the Germans and the Church attempting to outlaw its use is correct, to my understanding.

    • @megafatuunna3467
      @megafatuunna3467 2 місяці тому

      Intresting

  • @johnysilverhand7905
    @johnysilverhand7905 10 місяців тому

    i love this channel

  • @afsarulsufal
    @afsarulsufal 10 місяців тому

    Which app you use for edit in this map?

  • @timothysmith-od8zr
    @timothysmith-od8zr 10 місяців тому +6

    I am very happy to know about medieval battles 17:18 😅