Make those folders for the Winchester Defender, Remington 870, Mossberg 500 and Maverick 88 and they will sell more than they can produce. Pretty neat product.
@@vegeta420z6 It very well may, but there are a crap ton of them out there, even if a small percentage bought one it would be substantial, and I think most things that fit a Mossberg 500 also fit the Maverick 88.
the closer a red dot is to your face, the LESS situational awareness you have....this is why red dots are not shoved as far back as possible on AR platforms. both eyes open, put the dot out far, you can see just fine.
My experience with folding stocks on shotguns has always been the same - they fail. Shotguns are known to have a more stout recoil which causes these folding stocks to buckle under the force. Especially when it is a pump-action. The biomechanics of a folding stock plus a pump-action equals calamity. I would not get too excited over this until they have a version 2.0. Love the concept but I need further proof of its endurance and capabilities. Stay classy my friends.
Wish I could try one before I bought as I’ve never had a dot that close to my face. Is a folder on a 1301 legal in CA, I know a collapsible is not? With this stock on can the trigger group be removed without removing the stock or pistol grip?
Looks like no. Pursuant to Penal Code § 30515, an assault weapon includes any of the following: A semiautomatic shotgun that has both of the following: (A) A folding or telescoping stock; (B) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, thumbhole stock, or vertical handgrip. oag.ca.gov/ogvp/fed-assault-weapons-ban
Wish I could have got the folded but not here in California. Popped a matchsaverz on it too and took the magpul grip off and put a nice rubber ergo pistol grip on but I haven’t had a chance to shoot yet since I just got her in my hands 2 days ago.
Why aren’t they just selling the rear end so you can put whatever pic stock on it then..? The field of view argument is null and void because your supposed to shot dots with both eyes open lol
@huntersmith1061 I have cross eye dominance, shooting with my dominant hand (right) my left eyes view is prioritized so I mostly see the side of my optic or severe double vision.
@@AJ-xc4nmidk if anyone has told you this but cross eyed dominant people are supposed to shoot with their non dominant hand. Yeah it's weird but it puts the sight on your dominant eye which is more important
@shoelessbandit1581 no you're supposed to shoot however feels right and you can be confident with, mainly your dominant hand. That's the dumbest advise ever.
@@andrewhigh4875 How about we make fun of them for pointing a weapon at audience members at shotshow f*** that dude I don't care if the gun is inactive or not bad habit
I agree with you dude, spend the money on a better shotgun, if you have a top tier shotgun, spend the money on optics or a light...i guess if you have shit tons of cash and just want to flex on the poors drop 460 dollars on less comfortable then the factory bit of aluminum that folds?
@@Dies1r4e I get the feeling this was either a contract fulfillment or a very specific customer order. Folding stock? Okay. For the 1301? Uh.. alright, odd choice. Made out of aluminum? Okay.. maybe for weight balance? Red dot mount near your face? Also a strange choice. $400 price tag? Costs a fraction of the gun but easily as much as an optic or a shotgun itself, maybe two. Weird product.
Field of view is not a problem for red dots. Both eyes open! Parallax on the other hand is exacerbated by mounting closer to the eye.
Still a cool product and parallax probably isn't a big deal with a shotgun.
Make those folders for the Winchester Defender, Remington 870, Mossberg 500 and Maverick 88 and they will sell more than they can produce. Pretty neat product.
Maverick 88?
That stock cost almost as much as 2 Maverick 88's
@@vegeta420z6 It very well may, but there are a crap ton of them out there, even if a small percentage bought one it would be substantial, and I think most things that fit a Mossberg 500 also fit the Maverick 88.
Winchester 1200/1300 please
the closer a red dot is to your face, the LESS situational awareness you have....this is why red dots are not shoved as far back as possible on AR platforms. both eyes open, put the dot out far, you can see just fine.
Josh's enthusiasm on this thing kinda makes me think "maybe I want one"
Shotguns have always been cool because they’re the original bang thud gun.
i know it is weird but please do one (or adapter) for the m3 super 90!
Can you mount a side saddle ( The Aridus Q-DC) directly to that stock?
If you close your eyes and listen he sounds like pat mcafee
Will there be color matching stocks for the new Beretta 1301 grey, green, and FDE?
Passively mentions that closed emitters are superior
My experience with folding stocks on shotguns has always been the same - they fail.
Shotguns are known to have a more stout recoil which causes these folding stocks to buckle under the force. Especially when it is a pump-action. The biomechanics of a folding stock plus a pump-action equals calamity.
I would not get too excited over this until they have a version 2.0. Love the concept but I need further proof of its endurance and capabilities.
Stay classy my friends.
I have more hope for it given that it's completely made out of metal. But rounds down range are the only real truth tellers in this business.
I need one for my tac13
While I love this, it costs as much as the entire Langdon Tactical 1301 upgrade package. It just isn’t worth the cost IMHO.
So beneilli M2 & M4?
Wish I could try one before I bought as I’ve never had a dot that close to my face. Is a folder on a 1301 legal in CA, I know a collapsible is not? With this stock on can the trigger group be removed without removing the stock or pistol grip?
Looks like no.
Pursuant to Penal Code § 30515, an assault weapon includes any of the following:
A semiautomatic shotgun that has both of the following: (A) A folding or telescoping stock; (B) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, thumbhole stock, or vertical handgrip.
oag.ca.gov/ogvp/fed-assault-weapons-ban
Make one for the benelli M4
They might be able to do a fixed version, but the M4 recoil spring is housed in a tube that extends out behind the receiver by over a foot.
@@terryfaugno9242 o really? i was looking for a folding stock Benelli to buy since the fix and collapse stock look relatively the same
Impressive
I like the Aridus Crom better then that rear mounted setup.
And the rest of the stock is kinda fugly, the folder is seems useful.
Would be sick on my Tac-14!
I'll be waiting for the 590
Bought a fixed stock the day I bought my 1301. Love it!
I am beyond jealous of your shotgun setup!
Wish I could have got the folded but not here in California. Popped a matchsaverz on it too and took the magpul grip off and put a nice rubber ergo pistol grip on but I haven’t had a chance to shoot yet since I just got her in my hands 2 days ago.
@@CryptoNut82
Wait, the foldable stock is illegal in California?
@@johnconnor7501 sadly not
I started to laugh when I seen the 350-450 dollar price tag. No thanks
I guess its cool if you ignore all the people run side saddle shell holders.
Cough...cough....Mossberg 930/940 . :)
We need a brace
Why aren’t they just selling the rear end so you can put whatever pic stock on it then..?
The field of view argument is null and void because your supposed to shot dots with both eyes open lol
Not everyone can shoot both eyes open
@@AJ-xc4nmwell then you’re literally doing it wrong lol
@huntersmith1061 I have cross eye dominance, shooting with my dominant hand (right) my left eyes view is prioritized so I mostly see the side of my optic or severe double vision.
@@AJ-xc4nmidk if anyone has told you this but cross eyed dominant people are supposed to shoot with their non dominant hand. Yeah it's weird but it puts the sight on your dominant eye which is more important
@shoelessbandit1581 no you're supposed to shoot however feels right and you can be confident with, mainly your dominant hand. That's the dumbest advise ever.
A300 Patrol? 😉
The A300 Patrol can't have a folding stock. The recoil system runs through where the grip is.
@@CalzaTheFox fixed version
@@toddparsons2980 Hmm?
@@CalzaTheFox he said they have a fixed stock for the A300 Patrol.
bead sights on shotguns minimum, ghost rings maximum - unless it's a slug gun. buy ammo instead
Why is this not for mossberg also😩
I believe this is in the works
@@ARFCOMNews you’re a godsend! Something to look forward too!
Bought it, hated it.
Why?
Is it me or does everybody find Josh annoying can't watch his videos
Yes, he interrupts too much
yeah let's bully him for getting excited about shot gun stocks
@@andrewhigh4875 How about we make fun of them for pointing a weapon at audience members at shotshow f*** that dude I don't care if the gun is inactive or not bad habit
Josh talking trash about millennials when he is one.
I think his brain is telling him to use the term zoomer but his mouth keeps saying millenial. Keep him honest! - Spicy
I don’t see why you would want this
Good thing others want something different than you, otherwise we'd all be driving Teslas and eating bugs and non-meat burgers.
I agree with you dude, spend the money on a better shotgun, if you have a top tier shotgun, spend the money on optics or a light...i guess if you have shit tons of cash and just want to flex on the poors drop 460 dollars on less comfortable then the factory bit of aluminum that folds?
@@brivas3343So instead of offering a reason WHY someone would want this, you mock him instead?
@@Dies1r4e I get the feeling this was either a contract fulfillment or a very specific customer order.
Folding stock? Okay.
For the 1301? Uh.. alright, odd choice.
Made out of aluminum? Okay.. maybe for weight balance?
Red dot mount near your face? Also a strange choice.
$400 price tag? Costs a fraction of the gun but easily as much as an optic or a shotgun itself, maybe two.
Weird product.