@@risin1146 Only saying that SMC is not the only way to trade and that you can catch a lot of pips. People in SMC never catch the whole moves because they are always thinking that the trade is going to reverse.
Regular Divergence market probability reversal and hidden divergence for trend continuation simple...higher time frame the best strategy for divergence.
Meh, divergence or price deceleration can be found on any timeframe with sufficient volume to provide readable price action. I wouldn't try to read divergence or any price action at all on something exotic like intraday TRYZAR, but any of the majors will give you sufficient volume for reading divergence/deceleration all the way down to M1 or even 1-tick charts (at least during active sessions like London and NYC morning).
Divergence is price deceleration, or acceleration against the current trend. It happens on any timeframe, as long as the instrument you trade has enough volume to give you readable price action. However, just b/c price slows down doesn't mean it MUST reverse. just be sure to have a stop (like Tradeciety always recommends) in case trend resumes, and also watch your trade to make sure further price action shows additional signs of confirming the deceleration becoming a full reversal. (I use higher highs and lows, as a downtrend break confirmation, and lower lows lower highs as an uptrend break confirmation) I trade sub-minute EURUSD and use M1 as my higher timeframe. Works great there.
retail trader money comprises less than 10% of total spot forex volume, acc to BIS. That means 90% of all the price movement you see is driven by large corporate/institutional money. Plus unless you have access to a bank's order book or a network of liquidity providers, you can't know which tick movements are from which market participants b/c the forex market doesn't have a central exchange with a publicly viewable or purchasable order book. That's just fancy sales fluff from trading shills trying to sell their exclusive trading education courses. A lot of actual retail orders that are smaller than 100 lots are bundled up and sold/resold in larger packets to larger market participants anyway, until the retail orders merge with overall order flows a few milliseconds later, so who really knows which price ticks and how much of each price tick are really retail anyway? It's not like anything less than $5-10 million in volume is even going to move the needle on one of the forex majors, so all those huuuuge 10-lot retail orders won't even show up on the price chart. XD XD XD Incidentally, you can do your own Google search for studies that have found that the tick volume data from any single price data source (usually a liquidity provider network of banks/market makers that is a subset of total global institutional participants) is about 90% accurate as a proxy for actual volume. Is a series of smaller price movements really a cluster of "dumb retail" orders? Or is it an institutional order broken up into smaller icebergs and executed by an algo in order to minimize slippage and extract more value?
This is actually true gold it works so many times
Divergence is a killerrrr!!! So Many pips that smc can't Even dream to catch
Bro you are insignificant liquidity in the market what r u talking about
Means you never understood smc! Smc could catch better pips and optimize better entries and exits!
@@risin1146 Only saying that SMC is not the only way to trade and that you can catch a lot of pips. People in SMC never catch the whole moves because they are always thinking that the trade is going to reverse.
Regular Divergence market probability reversal and hidden divergence for trend continuation simple...higher time frame the best strategy for divergence.
Meh, divergence or price deceleration can be found on any timeframe with sufficient volume to provide readable price action.
I wouldn't try to read divergence or any price action at all on something exotic like intraday TRYZAR, but any of the majors will give you sufficient volume for reading divergence/deceleration all the way down to M1 or even 1-tick charts (at least during active sessions like London and NYC morning).
This is bullish tripple tap. ❤ Thank you. These shorts are quick revision on their own.
Amazing sir ❤
retest amaizing
tq info
What is the indicator?
Rsi
relative strength index
Super
can we do,this trick in 1min time frame?
Divergence is price deceleration, or acceleration against the current trend. It happens on any timeframe, as long as the instrument you trade has enough volume to give you readable price action.
However, just b/c price slows down doesn't mean it MUST reverse. just be sure to have a stop (like Tradeciety always recommends) in case trend resumes, and also watch your trade to make sure further price action shows additional signs of confirming the deceleration becoming a full reversal. (I use higher highs and lows, as a downtrend break confirmation, and lower lows lower highs as an uptrend break confirmation)
I trade sub-minute EURUSD and use M1 as my higher timeframe. Works great there.
❤
Bro these are retail dum money
retail trader money comprises less than 10% of total spot forex volume, acc to BIS. That means 90% of all the price movement you see is driven by large corporate/institutional money. Plus unless you have access to a bank's order book or a network of liquidity providers, you can't know which tick movements are from which market participants b/c the forex market doesn't have a central exchange with a publicly viewable or purchasable order book. That's just fancy sales fluff from trading shills trying to sell their exclusive trading education courses.
A lot of actual retail orders that are smaller than 100 lots are bundled up and sold/resold in larger packets to larger market participants anyway, until the retail orders merge with overall order flows a few milliseconds later, so who really knows which price ticks and how much of each price tick are really retail anyway? It's not like anything less than $5-10 million in volume is even going to move the needle on one of the forex majors, so all those huuuuge 10-lot retail orders won't even show up on the price chart. XD XD XD
Incidentally, you can do your own Google search for studies that have found that the tick volume data from any single price data source (usually a liquidity provider network of banks/market makers that is a subset of total global institutional participants) is about 90% accurate as a proxy for actual volume.
Is a series of smaller price movements really a cluster of "dumb retail" orders? Or is it an institutional order broken up into smaller icebergs and executed by an algo in order to minimize slippage and extract more value?
cherry picking