Joe Rogan's worst misinformation yet, with RFK Jr.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 чер 2023
- Patreon: / drwilsondebunks
I rarely read UA-cam comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly and I will be glad to respond to you when I can: Email: dr.wilson.debunk@gmail.com
Facebook (direct message): / docwilsondebunks
Rotavirus vaccine information: ourworldindata.org/rotavirus-...
Basics on checmical context: www.assda.asn.au/technical-in...
What the peer-reviewed scientific literature says about the safety oof Thimerosal: www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.ajog.org/article/S0002-93...
www.thelancet.com/journals/la...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.chop.edu/centers-programs...
Thimerosal effects on cells in a dish: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Adjuvants have been extensively safety tested over several decades: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Tdap has not been pulled in the US: www.healthline.com/health/adu...
DTaP and encephalitis: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Extensive safety profile oof DTaP, Tdap, and other vaccines: nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
Every first vaccine has been tested in placebo-controlled trials before going to market:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34780...
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley...
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...
Childhood vaccines have been incredibly impactful when it comes to saving lives and preventing suffering: publications.aap.org/pediatri...
Guide to vaccinology: www.nature.com/articles/s4157...
Measles statistics: www.cdc.gov/measles/downloads...
Polio paralysis rates in India before vaccines: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Breusewitz v. Wyeth case that RFK Jr. misrepresents: www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/U...
Kennedy himself is suing Merck in a frivolous lawsuit over their HPV vaccines, Kennedy knows he is lying here: www.law.com/dailybusinessrevi...
More information on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...
Why we vaccinate babies against Hep B:
www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/hea...
journals.lww.com/jcge/Abstrac...
Vaccines don’t cause autism:
autismsciencefoundation.org/w...
www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/...
www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM...
nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
It really is a better understanding leading to more autism diagnoses:
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
www.statnews.com/2022/02/10/t...
Autism rates are actually similar across generations: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
European childhood vaccination coverage: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/b...
--Description continued in pinned comment--
---- Description (sources used) continued ---
Cell phones don’t cause brain tumors or damage the blood brain barrier: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.20702
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017310000718?via%3Dihub
Why you should get vaccinated even if previously infected: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04865-0
www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00159-7
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175
More on germinal centers: www.nature.com/articles/s41577-021-00657-1
Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID:
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362
Vitamin D doesn’t work for COVID:
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0267918
www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071230
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779952
How influenza causes secondary bacterial pneumonia: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642581/
AZT is an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC386922/pdf/pnas00325-0322.pdf
Anti-retroviral cocktails save lives: ourworldindata.org/art-lives-saved
Christine Maggiore’s story: www.latimes.com/local/la-me-christine-maggiore30-2008dec30-story.html
Some pharmacovigilance of COVID vaccines: www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext
drive.google.com/file/d/1_wHIYX-tGkGBPwuax7N8BxZPR4PTTCDm/view
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475
The 1976 flu vaccine story: www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The FDA is not “funded” by big pharma (CORRECTION: second source here should have been included in the video): www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=6bc1186549ec
www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2786
Basics of Autism: www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928
www.spectrumnews.org/news/new-studies-reveal-how-autism-might-alter-synapse-formation-pruning/
Song used for outro: Fan-made piece
Blah blah blah. Go debate
OK Dr. Willson just a little question about "drinking chlorine... " I understood the larger point you were trying to make and of course I agree ... but ... just how do you drink a gas 😅? pretty sure you would die from the effects of inhaling it first.
Also, your stomach isn't going to break down chlorine gas into hydrochloric acid, your stomach produces hydrochloric acid and a thick layer of mucus which is why your stomach doesn't digest itself. However if you swallow large quantities of hydrochloric acid you're going to have problems. But many of our medications are compounded with small amounts of hydrochloric acid.
@@paulacoyle5685 There are multiple states of matter and also solutions and mixtures. Such as chlorine tablets used for pools.
@@paulacoyle5685 go try it then
@@bobroberts8500 Joe rogan viewer right here jajaja.
It's real easy to sling mud. it's much more difficult to clean up the mess.
Dr Hortez approves this comment.
@@MessiahNonEstIt's "Hotez", and you're clearly embarrassed that he has credentials and education (and human decency) you can only dream of.
Both sides can say the exact same thing you said. That’s why it’s extremely important to research both sides with extreme thoroughness, and not listen to one side alone, or with bias. Bc it is very difficult to clean up messes.
I burst out laughing when he started talking about how Wifi causes cancer. This is textbook pseudoscience that should raise red flags.
Maybe he meant that his WIFE causes cancer. ;)
WiFi can cause cancer if it’s powerful enough more likely to just give you an internal sunburn like if you walk in front of one of those big white cones on radio towers
You might be thinking about microwaves
people have gotten tumors from cellphones you tool lol! it's proven.
You should try to grow 2 of the same plants 1 next to your wifi router and 1 on the other side of your house. And see the results.
People who tend to not do adequate research and have no idea what they're talking about, loooove to use the word pseudoscience. They think it makes them look smarter, when in actually they appear very uninformed.
I wonder if the people that listen to RFK Jr. for medical advice go to their M.D. when they need legal advice.
Says the guy who takes medical advice from politicians
@@michaelstevenson8069 - Nope, only from qualified medical professionals.
At 6:07 you note that "pretty much all the mercury is excreted" and from that you draw the conclusion that ethylmercury is safe. This is an incorrect way of reasoning, because it may be the non-excreted mercury that does the damage.
From the 2002 "Three Faces of Mercury" paper by the University of Rochester in New York by the Department of Environmental Medicine:
"Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury more rapidly than methyl mercury, but the latter produces more brain damage."
I direct you to the 3 papers cited in the 2 minutes before this time stamp you have here (three separate trials looking at neurological outcomes in fairly large population trials), rather than this descriptive paper you cite that has a few case reports of ethyl mercury exposures in much higher doses with a completely different method of ingestion (a serious of ivig infusions and plasma infusions). Those three papers aren’t just higher order types of data (larger sample size, an actual testable hypothesis, etc), they are also published after this 2002 paper you cite
@@ziachoudhury4769 Thank you for the papers. I have no challenge to their shared conclusion (i.e. that cognitive impairment is not associated with low-level thimerosal exposure in children). However, this conclusion is not the same thing as saying that ethylmercury is safe (the 2nd paper says as much in its conclusion).
There are large studies that draw the same conclusion for methylmercury exposure in children (e.g. Llop 2016, Myers 1998 & 2020, Patel 2019, Stratakis 2020, Vejrup 2022). However, I think you would probably agree with me that such studies do not provide a basis to say that methylmercury is safe.
As one of the papers that Wilson cites says: "no controlled studies of low-dose ethylmercury toxicity in humans have been conducted" (Hviid 2003 via Tamma 2009). This is because ethylmercury has traditionally been considered to have a similar safety profile to methylmercury (they differ by only one carbon atom), and so such controlled studies are not performed because they are considered reckless and dangerous.
Wilson's claim that ethylmercury leaves the body much quicker than methylmercury is true, but such blood-based analyses don't tell the whole mercury-bioaccumulation picture. Critically, when we look at primate models of ethylmercury vs methylmercury vaccines (Burbacher 2005), the words of the researchers note that: "there was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)" and that data from the "study support the prediction that, although little accumulation of Hg in the blood occurs over time with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur. Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid, given the significantly slower half-life of Hg in the brain as observed in the infant macaques."
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." -Upton Sinclair
We've got a cast of characters here. Are you referring to someone in particular?
Yup. RFKjr is a glorified ambulance chaser.
@@kawasakiwhiptwo5821 I think immediatly of John Campbell.
@@emmajones8590 What are your feelings when you think of him?
Ohhhh…..
Lmao!
I seriously thought you were talking about this guy and the entire pharmaceutical companies!
😂
Why does Apple not recommend holding your phone up to your head?
From your iPhone legal document
To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.
Because of an abundance of caution. Every building, car, and business in California has a cancer warning on it. If you hold an dosimeter (reads for radioactivity) it won't read anything from an iphone. Not all radiation is radioactive. There are going to be random correlations that look like there are patterns but are just as I said random. This can be explained as "dartboard statistics" where you throw a whole bunch of darts on a barn and then draw the target after. Otherwise we have to believe that everything everywhere causes cancer.
This is essentially legalese to protect themselves from liability in case RFK types try to sue them with spurious correlations in cell phone usage and cancer rates.
Apple has probably not tested the RF frequency exposures with every single type of cell phone case out there, many made by third parties, so this is just a blanket warming against possible liability.
Though as a physicist, I cannot for the life of me imagine how even a metal case could change the RF enough to even get close to approaching dangerous levels.
Remember anything up to 300 GHz is withing safe guidelines, which is miles away from even 5 GHz, which is the highest frequencies that most cell phones use
@@ValleyDragonit even mentions some cases made of metal. I imagine they wrote this to protect them from shoddy third party companies who produce phone cases with unforseen side effects that people might blame on apple themselves.
Not that a simple metal case could possibly turn harmless radio waves into dangerous ionizing radiation, but this is a legal document, not a peer reviewed study.
If you have a a metal plate in your head
@@wallacegrommet9343 Incorrect, thats not what the guidelines say.
You need to be on JRE for sure! Thank you for standing up.
JRE?...LOL
JR would eat him alive .. wouldn't stand a chance..
@@andrewfinlay5160 100% agree, RFK and JR would shred this guy. dr.wilson is a pharma shill, its insane how dishonest this guy is.
@@andrewfinlay5160Rhetorical effectiveness isn’t the same as scientific knowledge or being correct. Maybe it wouldn’t go well for him, still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
Below are just some of the studies that show negative biological effects of Radiofrequency or Wifi radiation.
While Non-ionizing radiation does not carry enough energy to remove an electron from an atom or molecule that does not mean that it can't have biological effects. Near infrared light has been shown to have positive biological effects while Wifi and Radiofrequency have been shown to have neagtive biological effects.
For exampole: Wifi and RF waves have been shown to increase the amount of Reactive Oxygen Species in sperm cells which can damage the DNA as mentioned in one of the studies below. So saying that Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause DNA damage is not true. The damage is not caused by heating from these waves because the energy produced from phones is insignificant. It is well described the possible methodology of how these Electromagnetic waves could affect our mitochondria.
You also said that the radiations needs to be strong enough to penetrate through your skin. This is now how this works. Low frequency waves tend to penetrate materials more effectively than high frequency waves. For example, radio waves (which are low frequency) can penetrate walls and buildings, while higher frequency waves like X-rays are more likely to be absorbed or scattered by the materials they encounter.
I advocate more quality studies to be done in this area (studies that do not have conflict of interest!) and to take precautionary measures against Wifi and RF waves. It is important to note that being very close to the source of radiation is unadvised.
Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication (link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1019150510840)
Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211026781)
Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000133)
Exercise ameliorates hippocampal damage induced by Wi-Fi radiation; a biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical study (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061823000224)
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function (rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml)
So if the ethylmercury was so benign why did they stop using it?
Misinformed public pressure? They found something better? They found something cheaper? Not hard to think of plausible explanations.
@@delfordchaffin5617 I think they were looking for an actual answer, not more questions.
Thank you for this video! ❤
And just like that your false sense of security is achieved 😇
❤
It’s because they affirm Joe’s biases.
Thanks!
A science communicator, not a scientist only, should debate RFK
Thank you!
I loved your video. I learned more about variants of mercury and ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation. Id love to see you, him, and Rogan or Lex in a room to discuss these topics. +1 to your subscriber pool 😊
ua-cam.com/video/rs2Abw0NEBM/v-deo.html
Lex shouted out this channel before his with RFK, he’d totally facilitate that.
All I can say is I'm soooooo glad that I didn't get vaccinated 🍿. Continue.....
Why do you boast about being a complete whacko with no regard for others?
Love the T-shirt!!!!! 👍😎👍
Great Work. 🔥👍
Thanks for all your terrific work. That was a breath of fresh air.
At 10:25, you say that the DPT vaccine "has never been pulled" and that it never caused damage, but RFK was talking about the whole-cell DPT vaccine (which was pulled in 1996) and not the acellular DTap and Tdap vaccines you are referring to.
Also, a paper put out in 1994 by the National Academy of Medicine said that there was a lack of sufficient evidence either for or against neurological damage from the DPT vaccines. The lawsuits and accused damage were the impetus for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Acellular pertussis vac was discontinued due to fear of significant adverse effects but not because there was an actual proof of rare but significant adverse effects
Much of the impetus for this research has been the concern that pertussis vaccine could cause significant and permanent neurological damage. Recent reviews of these data do not support such an association (2) but the desire for an alternate vaccine continues because of the high rate of minor local and systemic adverse reactions following pertussis immunization .
Benefit vs risk ratio was still overwhelmingly in favor of cellular vaccine . Just that accelular was better now there are thoughts of bringing older vaccine back because of higher effectiveness .
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
21:18 I was at school in the early 1960’s and neither autism or ADHD were recognised. Anyone showing signs of these conditions was considered a disruptive influence or a daydreamer or worse.
Yes, exactly this!
Where are all the 60yr olds with autism today? They should still be around at the same rate we're seeing autism in children
@@unvaccinated6467 what do you mean by autism? I worked with adults with learning disabilities including autism. We are not talking about high functioning autism such as Asperger’s, those affected people are effectively behind an impenetrable barrier. A colleague of mine was high functioning and was working as a paramedic. Autism is a spectrum of signs and symptoms. Older people could be on the spectrum but have managed throughout their lives so why would they need a specific diagnosis?
@@unvaccinated6467 Sadly, autistic people, have an average life expectancy ranging from 39.5 years to 58 years. That's why.
@@unvaccinated6467That is an unenlightened view, one of many things you don't understand is social media didn't exist, so you simply didn't hear about it, and the stigma around having a child like that kept them hidden, that is until schools were created for them, huge signs saying, Spastic Centre, and they were transported in vehicles with, Spastic Bus in big letters up the side, many were abandoned into orphanages, I spent a large part of the 70's with my Father taking abandoned children out once a month, that is where I first experienced the damage caused by Thalidomide.
Awesome video, thank you! Keep up the good work!
@neverforget1971 calmly explaining things is having a tantrum?
@@ben5154he calmly lied and ignored the Burbacher study and Danish government data. He calmly exposed himself as a total fraud.
RFK jr mentions a study where they tested monkeys and found that ethyl-mercury (or methyl?) indeed left the blood quickly but upon autopsy were found in large concentrations in the brain. it would be nice for you to address this as well..
Found in the brain, but decreases over time. There's also no evidence it does anything to hamper development either. People just see "mercury" and enter panic mode without thinking. That's how RFK Jr. gets you.
That study was in the early 2000’s and thimerosal was removed from most vaccines in 2001. A great example of scientists identifying a potential risk, testing for it, and then action being taken to make vaccines safer. Isn’t that a good thing? Wouldn’t it be more worrisome if they never found anything wrong with the vaccines?
If you can find the name of the study, I'll happily take a closer look.
Read up on the use of adjuvants in vaccines. It’s still not really understood why it is they cause the immune system to increase its response.
@@geraintwdit was done by Burbacher
More! More! More! (I yell as I smash my fists holding my fork an knife on the table over and over)
Thank you for this. I learned a lot.
At 20:15, RFK mentions"full blown autism" and you claim that this is "disgusting" because he's calling it "a fate worse than death."
You claim that autism "is just a brain type", but in fact, autism is classified as a disorder (i.e. ASD stands for Autism Spectrum Disorder).
This is a bit of a bad faith interpretation of the thread from Wilson here imo. The full context of what he’s trying to convey (I think), is that using language like “full blown autism” is a scare tactic/appeal to fear, and implicit in that language is the idea that autistic people can’t like meaningful lives. I don’t think Dr. Wilson is not aware that ASD is considered a disorder (I don’t think that you actually think that he thinks this either)
@@ziachoudhury4769 You are completely right that I don't think Dr. Wilson is unaware that autism is considered a disorder. However, his statement that "autism is just a brain type" seems to imply that he believes that autism is neither good, nor bad. Would you agree?
Either way, I fail to see the justification for Wilson calling RFK "disgusting" simply for using the term "full blown autism." The latest terminology in the DSM would call such autism "Level 3 autism," but most laypeople don't know this language or use it. Autism is generally categorized on a spectrum, and terms like "severe autism" and "full blown autism" are common, even in the scientific literature. For instance, in the paper "How autism became autism" (Evans 2013), which looks at the history of the word autism, the author uses the term "full-blown" in categorizing autism, but in no way is it done from a basis of being pejorative or fear-inducing.
There is a movement amongst the science community to consider autism, amongst other types, as a neuro-type (hence the name neurodivergent) and not a disorder to treat. It’s basically polite/ woke lingo/ mindset.
Full-blown dishonesty is RFK jr
I agree. RFK jr is fear mongering using autism as a fate worse than death, beyond all hope, and a mark of Satan
Thanks.
🍆🍌👅👅👅
Hey Dr. Wilson. This is my first time on your channel. I watched the kennedy podcast, and have been looking around for info on vaccines since then. To me, the most compelling part of Kennedy’s argument was the Burbacher study. I’m curious why you didn’t think that study was worth addressing. Thanks
What part of the Burbacher report supports RFK’s ideas? I’m genuinely curious, because the parts of the report I read (as a lay person, not a scientist) imply that comparing ethylmercury and methylmercury is like comparing apples to oranges due to their different half-lives in the body (which Dr. Wilson mentioned).
Also, the CDC specifically cites the Burbacher report on its list of resources supporting the safe use of Thimerosal, which seems counterproductive if they are trying to obfuscate the dangers of vaccines.
@@robfinch2359 My very amateur takeaway is that ethylMercury stays in the blood a long time and that methylMercury does NOT stay in the blood a long time.
Those advocating these vaccines as safe use this fact in favor of their case. The methylMercury no longer shows up in the blood tests, so therefore it must have been flushed out and therefore all is well and good.
The Burbacher study is suggesting that while the methlymercury indeed exited the blood, it did NOT exit the body. Rather it lodged into the brain (ugh!).
Same point - methyl mercury found in the brain
After no longer found in the blood -read the study findings!
Why did this doc avoid this study’s findings???
So dangerous to pick and parcel parts of these interviews leaving out details that do not support your narrative
And that are frankly UNTRUE
Also RFK JR is fully vax’d AND has represented parents with kids WITH vax Injuries. SOME PEOPLE ARE GETTING INJURED BY SOME Vax!
Why oh why mandate ‘safe for all’ when that simply is proven over and over NOT TO BE TRUE!
i.e. my own son is severely allergic to an antibiotic that is very common and saves many many lives over many many years!
I am severely allergic to a totally different anti biotic after a terrible reaction in my 20’s
Yes it works so well for others!
This is one of RFK Jr’s points - not all vax are safe for all
Why will no one else speak this truth?
Why will this doc NOT note the huge settlements to families who’s kids were severely injured from vax?
So scary what this doc claims to be debunking
Follow the money
So sad to realize this
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
@@robfinch2359Mercury is The old poisoning except for in flu shots The new blood poisoning is aluminum. Delicious And nutritious yummy. Inject right into your bloodstream by pass all barriers. 👍👍👍 I love you guys your All so smart lol lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ditto
Thank you so much for this video, the best I've seen of this type. One observation: you mention at the end that the debate about the causes of Autism have been debated - in journals, at conferences and so forth. This is the beef I have with the medical community and the media too - I WANT TO HEAR THIS FOR MYSELF. I WANT TO SEE THESE PEOPLE ON THE NEWS, IN LONG SEGMENTS, TALKING ABOUT THIS.
We need more videos like this.
Thank you for this ❤
*_"Vineland, NJ - 33 year old Nadia Chubok returned from a routine night shift as a medical professional lay down to sleep and did not wake up. She died suddenly on July 7, 2023, leaving behind 2 orphaned kids age 4 and 11"_*
Joe Rogan should understand the "2 Mercuries" concept very well. He wont shut up about THC & DMT being different depending on how you use it.
Go eat either mercury.
Both will kill you - This is embarrassing
like people trying to sell you a bridge.
the experimental drug is bad. no ifs ands or buts
I cant validate everything but Dr. Wilson did misrepresent Rogans statement on vitamin D being a cure for Covid. Cuz Rogan never said "if u replace the Vitamin D in a sick person they will get better." As Wilson claims he did. @29:46 Rogan was talking about it as a preventative only, and never with certainty, just him talking about his logic of them being linked.
He also misrepresented rogan claiming that ivermectin helped him... He said he took it and other things and he got better quickly, he never claimed that ivermection was the reason. If you are "debunking" someone you have to stick only to the facts or you debunk yourself. There are other problems with this vid that are basically the same misinformation tactics that big pharma uses, and they are no better than rfk Jr.
Yeah they act like they are so smart saying vitamin d doesn’t cure covid well duh.but if you have low d levels when infected you get way sicker that’s a fact they want to hide so you get vaxed every year
Wilson didn't say that Rogan was saying that though. He said it was a reasonable question to ask, then explained that they got an answer to that question
@@richardelliott84 I think you should listen to the time stamp I posted. He does say Rogan said it would get rid of the sickness to replace the vitamin D. Hence his metaphor about cleaning up the ashes.
Maybe he didn't say it her but he said elsewhere. Joe Rogan is a crook.
Love the T-shirt!!!😍
Thank you for this, I like JRE but I like the truth the most. We need you on JRE 😂
He lets people talk put their 2 cents in. This whole I don’t agree with so you so not be allowed to talk crap has got to stop. The problem is everyone wants to control what other people are doing and saying. If you don’t like the info change the channel. What RFK is saying is once you understand how the whole medical data system works you understand it will always side with whoever is funding it. Because they need that conclusion to generate more money for more funding. So you don’t necessarily get 100% accurate data. The data is skewed to support whoever’s funding it. Let’s say I’m a company I hire a scientist to research something for me and his findings will literally put me out of business. I’m not going to make that data public I’m gonna go hire another scientist to figure out how not to come to that conclusion. I will promise him more funding for a project that he wants in the future and the cycle continues. What the vaccine has done is made doctors that are coming up on retirement question everything that they’ve been reading for years. We’re at that level that every system is so corrupt you can’t trust anything. When do you have a system where politicians can be bought nothing is organic or legitimate it’s always gonna be skewed for profit.
This guy is too scared to debate anyone. Just sits an interpreter the way he wants. I'll debate him.
@@woodyjud7149So, lets hear it!
Peopel just need to stop watching JRE. IT's terribad.
@@beansnrice321 why is it terrible. Have you watched it
Great video. Thank you.
I love it when he says "Now you are going beyond my expertise". The whole f*cking podcast is WAY beyond his expertise.RFK once said he loves science. Well, the love is not mutual. Joe Rogan as journalist is a catastrophy. His task would be to *critically* ask RFK about his views. Critically. RFK would not survive that for 10 minutes.
Seriously just glossing over when someone makes a claim but can't actually defend or explain it is like, anti-journalism.
Look guys, I don’t really care about RFK one way or another. I actually just paid attention to him for the first time when I ran across some video about the whole back and forth between Joe Rogan and that doctor from MSNBC when the doctor was offered over a million dollars to charity to debate RFK. And he wouldn’t. Why can’t we get anyone who knows what the hell they’re talking about to go and just debate the guy and go point by point through the anti-vax argument and demolish it in a very public and genuine way? It hurts the credibility of science in general… and for someone like me who believes in science and works in medicine it really does make me question the accepted consensus sometimes. And we can all admit that not all conspiracies are just crackpot theories, right? While I don’t know how people can make the leap to lizard people and blood-drinking, satanic pedophiles running our country - it does strengthen even QAnon as well as the anti-vaxers when there’s nobody who will stand up and take the time to refute the bullshit positions when challenged to debate them.
@@iamjustkiwi Seriously pretending that podcast, hosted by guy who never ever claimed to journalist and calls it "long conversation with friends and interesting people", is antijournalism is as stupid as it gets
He has been working with and representing the vaccine_injured and their families for well over a decade. He is an expert in the harm that some people suffer and is compassionate towards those harmed.
@@carlitaticconi6655 Really? Samoa 2019.
The HIV story really got me, an effective (and sad) reality of being anti-vaccine. If that can’t convince someone then very little can. Appreciate the work DTF! 💉
Remember that folks born after the 1990s really didn't grow up with the threat of AIDS being presented to them by the MSM. The kids I know in their teens & 20's now don't even think of AIDS as a threat to them.
Two of my friends, both diagnosed HIV-positive, decided to end their treatment a few years ago. Both are still active in the community via apps like grindr and tindr. While both are passive or receptive men, thus their rates of communication are lower, it can be assumed that as their viral load increases, so will their opportunity to infect others. Not to mention the dissolution of their own immune defense. They stopped their meds at the beginning of Covid-19, and you can imagine the type of information that prompted their choice to terminate treatment. It's all likely to end in tragedy.
Atz killed tons of gays and had no benefit whatsoever. The gays revolted against fauci in the 80s.
Was Kary Mullis ever convinced that HIV was a proven cause of AIDS?
think of how many gays died because of "dr" Fauci
44:12 in the U.K. most of our regulatory agencies such as the MHRA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) get most of their funding from the industries that they regulate. In fact the CAA is required to obtain all of its funding from the fees it charges, which includes annual airworthiness tests on aircraft. I’m not sure about the MHRA, I would think that it was 75% at least.
All these people complaining about pharma companies paying for their submissions to be assessed never seem able to come up with who should pay for it. It's kind of strange that they want pharma companies to be subsidised by having someone else pay for this process.
ua-cam.com/video/OpaVCTtxBnE/v-deo.html
The media have been captured by big pharma, CNN, MSNBC, and the other big media outlets all brought to you by Pfizer, stands to reason you are only going to hear what Pfizer wants you to hear. Make them liable for their products and see the change that takes place. Pfizer are the proud holders of the largest fine for fraudulent practices, $2.3 billion in 2009. They have also admitted that the vaccines can be shed, so be careful who you snuggle up close to..
How about the billions of dollars in profits the pharmaceutical companies make. And instead of paying 130 billions of dollars to fund foreign wars we put that money towards our public health agencies… just a thought
Great video! Love the long form, point by point format. Best video you've put out so far.
That sheep talks!
@@Lp78Ch Wow, way to display your ignorance and inability to communicate as an adult. Does your mom & dad know you're up this late?
@@lufcharrison2234says the ignorant bashing sheep who simply follows a different shepherd.
Rogan doesn't give a flying fig about accuracy and truth. He is just in it for the clicks.
He makes around $20,000 per day and one might suggest that he contributes to the same number of individuals that suffer from poor decisions made by individuals who are mislead and have their ‘murcah cause free-dumb’ spirit monetised through clicks.
@@poerava And, when he is called out by people who know better, he always falls back on the, "Chill, bruh. I'm just a dumb meathead asking questions", excuse. No, he is actively promoting things that are controversial even when they are patently idiotic. I don't think he's as stupid as he likes to pretend to be. He may have zero actual knowledge about science but he sure knows what sells.
@@poerava hes worth over $100 million he dont care about clicks he couldnt spend the interest on that daily even if he tried to
@@christophercook9745
Mo money mo problems.
@@christophercook9745 he got to the level of wealth he has BECAUSE HE CARES ABOUT CLICKS. The money didnt just fucking appear in his account for no reason......
People....we need to share this video everywhere we can.
Thank-you so much for making these videos!!
This was a really good explanation and breakdown on RFK’s claims. I’m now leaning more against his claims on vaccines. However, something that I would’ve liked to see differently is when considering if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a resounding YES.
You talk about how usually the questions he asks (we all ask) have already been asked and answered by a scientist somewhere, and debated in an office, classroom, water cooler, etc. Well the average person doesn’t have access to those conversations and that’s what we want to hear. We don’t want to continue with the “trust the experts” narrative. Sure, they might be right most of the time, but we want to understand it as well. We want to have access to those conversations, that’s how we get less distrustful. And what better way to do so than to have a debate with someone who has strong opposing views on the matter.
When asked if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a YES, absolutely. There should be nothing to lose if we’re doing it in the name of curiosity, science and knowledge.
That is exactly the problem. RFK debating a scientist is exactly what he wants, especially a live debate. To the viewer, it makes it appear that RFK is on a similar level to a scientist before the debate had even started. When it does begin, RFK merely needs to go outside of the scope of the scientists field of expertise, or the scope of debate. Once he does, it is very easy for him to make whatever claim he likes without fear of contradiction. This is exactly what happened with Monkton when he debated a climate scientist live. Another outcome occured with Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, where Ham used a whole array of debating tactics, fallacies, and forged evidence. As soon as anyone bothered to check the claims of Ham, they quickly found that he had made most of it up.
A proper scientific debate is a lot more rigid though. It is slower for starters. Claims always need to be backed up with sources, and every source has the time to be checked. The whole point is to expose errors and find out what is right and wrong. This is the exact opposite of what RFK wants.
@@Skidzo19 What a pathetic deflection and excuse. The truth is, and pretty much the majority of people know it, the transfection and covidian cult has lied about everything and cannot defend itself in any face to face manner. There have been numerous debating forums with scientist against scientist organized and attempted to be organized, and the cult side never showed up. Pathetic. Your argument is a joke and only serves to justify your side's cowardice and lack of confidence.
@@philo3479You have no idea what deflection is, do you? It's the same topic. Funnily enough, this is also a debating tactic used during live debates.
A face to face debate is not necessary to review and debate evidence. This is regularly done in the scientific literature. RFK could also respond in video format to any of the videos made debunking him, which would therefore start a debate. So why doesn't he go ahead and do it?
Watching bored millionaires like Musk , Rogan and Kennedy trying to turn science and Healthcare into a spectator bloodsport makes my blood boil.
Thanks so much for your tenacity and bravery in continuing to debunk their BS .
We ALL need to do our bit to help and it's so helpful that you explain the FACTS and the science so clearly .
Great editing also !
Well said!
Actual science is abrasive and confrontational. If you want your information to lull you to sleep, go participate in religion.
@@jonnovak6856...no? What the hell kind of science are you falling for?
@iamjustkiwi I think maybe he once got given a chemistry set for Xmas and blew up his parents house ... now he expects all science-y stuff to be packed full of drama .
Or maybe just a short attention span... who knows
@@wsouthey8606 seriously! For some reason a lot of people seem to correlate the "excitement" of something with it's legitimacy but in the real world, a lot of facts and research are just kinda dull
On one side, the biggest anti-vaxxer in the world, on the other, the most credulous side of beef humanity has to offer.
You mean incredulous surely? He seems to go more counter culture as opposed to mainstream narratives.
Those of us who follow the mainstream guidance are credulous.
@@Jason-wm5qe Credulous means "gullible."
@@MickVegas precisely. We are the gullible ones for going with the path of least resistance. Like if the New York Times says it, I trust it.
It seems like Joe is skeptical being fair to him
@@Jason-wm5qe how is him bringing millionaires grifters on most of his episodes "counter culture"?
@@Jason-wm5qe "You mean incredulous surely?" 😀
No, he meant 'credulous', you silly thing!
I see English is not your strong point either.
How people don't understand you can listen to RFK or this guy and get whatever you want to hear is crazy. The push towards no debates is scary. RFK has laid his cards on the table, you could literally bring video of his claims to the debate and debunk it right in his face. And he could have the chance to bring his studies. How that's an alien idea is wild
It is not an alien idea. I think Dr Wilson would love to debate RFK but try getting RFK to go anywhere near someone who might challenge his claims is a different matter.
@@peterpeters7534 You do know that there was huge effort to get Peter Hotez to debate RJK jr. 2 months ago with significant charitable contributions offered and Hotez refused. Afterwards dozens of media outlets push narratives that it was best to not debate so called conspiracy theorists. I don't know where you get this idea RFK is not willing to debate, he certainly is.
@@zarbins Your kidding right? Yes the push was to get Holtz to debate RFK on the Joe Rogan podcast.
So let me get this right and please correct me if I am wrong; your saying that Holtz should debate RFK on a platform where the content and editing is controlled by Joe Rogan and his employees and the debate is moderated by Joe Rogan a known supporter of RFK and a known opponent of Vaccines?
You are seriously going to tell me with the outrageous lies RFK told on Joe Rogan and not only got away with not being challenged but supported by the host that this would be a fair and impartial platform?
What I am saying is RFK will never go on a program which is neutral and fair and debate someone who will challenge his claims; he has never done this in 20 years. I welcome his foray into politics perhaps then he will have nowhere to hide and be properly challenged.
@@peterpeters7534 ReasonTV put up challenging questions and got RJK jr. into a debate about his positions. Other podcasts and alternative media have as well.
Rogan's not an opponent of vaccines he's an opponent of vaccine mandates. He thinks there are plenty of people that should have been vaccinated.
I don't think Rogan would be as bias as you expect, he certainly has some respect for Holtz since he had him on the pod.
Anyways, I'll agree it would be nice to see a more formal unbiased debate. I'm sure they could have a neutral host as there is certainly desire to see it.
I find interest in the foray as well and not because I support everything he says or stands for, but I want to see how the system responds to his disposition.
I like to see the good doctor Wilson make a public offer to debate RFK Jr. I think Bobby would love to debate him.
I showed this debunk the funk broadcast to a nurse practitioner friend who's very up on viruses Etc and she debunked the good doctor's debunking point-by-point.
This is a great video and hopefully serves as a good example to not only the scientific community, but all of academia. We are living in a time where science is being faced with greater scrutiny than it has in past decades. It is a much better use of your time breaking down the nuance of misinformation, rather than making outright attempts to silence it. This channel will hopefully grow an act as a voice against public confusion.
What is factually correct is we are living in a time where “Science” is not based on science but is now a religion.
@@philo3479 Does that make RFK Jr the AntiChrist?
@@christopherrobinson7541 No, Greta Thunberg acts like one, and looks like one.
Get boosted in the fall when they tell you to order follower
His refutation of RFK's claims, are not true. None of the children's vaccines found in the schedule have been tested against true placebos in stage 3. None of them. They have all been tested against other vaccines or substances which can be harmful. Have you bothered to check it out or do you just believe what they tell you?
Another essential video… Thank you
Burbacher study. Ask yourself why this "essential" video didn't even address the study cited by RFK
Anyone else looking for that good morning guy or the one who spams that comment about lobsters in here? I was reading the comments on another video on this channel and those guys each have over ONE THOUSAND comments on his videos alone. Terrifying how obsessed those dudes are
Good god, that moron from hell was posting his cut-and-paste boldfaced/italicized nonsense within minutes of this video going up yesterday, and I wore my typing fingers out challenging him!
The lobster guy is Rab J. He's purely one of those " mythical Norwegian creatures " (YT hates the word, but if it's not obvious, search the term.) Generally, if you ignore them, they just go away.
GM1221 appears to be a genuine denier of a number of proven medical things. I really enjoy mocking him, but it's not worth engaging with him. It's impossible to win an argument with someones imagination.
@@diandian9827It was well worth wearing out your typing fingers - you did a great job! ⭐
Thank you so much for the information. I love how you break it down. We are going through the vaccination schedule with my little one and although we’ve followed it, I had a knot in my stomach the whole time.
One question, RFK mentions in the podcast that when the did the autopsy on the monkeys who were given the same mercury found in vaccines, they found it was not being excreted from in their urine/feces but was making its way and lodging in the brain. Is there any validity to the claim?
As shown from this video you cannot believe a word that comes out of Kenedy's mouth! Make up your own mind.
Thanks for sharing. I’m in the same boat with our first kid and like you, I’ve been so anxious about it and excited to finally find a video that can offer an explanation/argument debunking RFK’s claims because they are downright scary for a new parent
I’m curious about this as well.
@karlweber470 did Kennedy ever share his source, considering he doesn't understand that different formulation of mercury cab be more or less danger or interact differently
He talked about a study, I'd have to go back to the podcast and find it, but yes, he did provide a specific study@@ASH-su6nb
Thank you for what you do! Keep spreading the truth!
Thank you so much for this. I will share.
Genuine question about the two different types of mercury. RFK did say that studies showed ethyl mercury does not accumulate in the blood, but also in the only study of it's kind for obvious ethical reasons when I forget which species of primates were subject to a post-mortem examination they found that ethanol Mercury had accumulated in the brain. Are you aware of the study?
Also, as a social scientist, I might point out to you that it's worth at least acknowledging the misplaced influence that vested interest like corporate and state power can have on the conduct research and findings of science. That doesn't mean that of course all studies are not valid but especially when we are talking about fields of science in which there are very powerful vested interests and huge concentrations of economic and political power, it's worth at least acknowledging this as a potential variable. E.g, on which studies get funded and commissioned and which don't which studies can be subject to manipulations and fraud of various kinds which are not flagged because of corporate capture of the very institutions that are supposed to scrutinise these studies.
I say this, because the tone and register that you adopt when you speak in these videos sounds like it presupposes the incontestable and unquestioning authority of 'the' science. For instance when you talk about scientists who ask questions for a living.
The fields of philosophy of science as well as the Sociology of science and the history of science re contextualize the practise of science within its broader social milieu. I think as a molecular biologist, you don't take these factors into account.
Peter Hotez and his role is a case in point. During the pandemic he issued pronouncements and proclamations that used a framing and discourse that assumed the science was incontestable.
He proclaimed certainties such as covid vaccines preventing transmission or requiring only one dose, which we now know not to be true. Of course, the facts change and all knowledge is provisional, and so scientists are entitled to change their minds, but that is not the framing or the subtext of his contributions to public discourse.
The framing was that I am issuing proclamations and decrees that are certainties and anyone that dissents is ignorant and even dangerous.
In this sense we can see science or scientism functioning as a political authority or a form of disciplinary power as the French sociologist Michel Foucault described it. In other words, the scientific authorities establish certain social norms and standards which we must adhere to. And certain technologies which are used to surveil us ensure that we are following them and if we not we are then punished. I'd recommend if you haven't read it all ready Foucault's Discipline and Punish.
Another example of this is the whole controversy around ivermectin. Now you say that it has been thoroughly studied, although there is still a question over whether a truly large randomized controlled study with a big enough sample size has actually been done; I understand that one of the discoverers of ivermectin offered Merc the opportunity to do this and they turned it down, probably because it's not profitable. But putting that issue to one side, you will also be aware that we were repeatedly told through the mainstream corporate news outlets starts ivermectin is simply a drug for horses. No doubt you know that's not true and in fact is used to kill parasitic worms in humans as well. But instead scientific figures were mobilised to promulgate this discourse that it is only four horses and anyone that thinks otherwise is an idiot.
This is not how science in my opinion should proceed and is in fact highly damaging to the scientific endeavour, it's reputation and the trust that people hold in it.
Also, how do you know he's lying? He may be incorrect but to argue someone is lying presupposes knowledge of their intentions, and as a scientist I'm assuming you don't believe in telepathy, unless you have hard evidence that he is wilfully misleading the public.
@@martincrook8702 he is lying because he has been corrected many a times .
Also the studies are by academia . Your rant does not apply . The monkey study you are talking about is Burbacher study . You should actually read the study and you will find he even misrepresents that . There are several on the subject . Also why ignore multiple other studies that clearly show vaccine has zero to with autism . Now that autism is even better understood . Any body who knows biology of autism knows vaccine has zero to do with it - so studies on autism itself defy vaccine as cause . RFK jr knows he is lying.
Ivermectin , none that actually know science were very hopeful but the true villains made millions trying to take advantage of peoples misery during a pandemic . It took 100 times the concentration of normal dose to kill virus in kidney cells ( wrong cells only ) as lung cells don’t have channels where ivermectin worked .
Those maligning vaccines have to resort to fist out lying. Why is that ? Look at RFK jr a figure of complete disgrace and an example how lie people can sink . Did he apologize for his hand in the passing of 80 children ? Did he apologize to Dr Offit after letting johnson his family from his lies about the money and his vaccine ? The sane person no wonder writes a plethora of lies about real life super Gerri Dr Fauci
The reason was that actually , animal stores and veterinarians stores was robbed.
Also it was because of an increased tiredness of the conspirasists, to found ANY drugs to use EXCEPT the vaccine.
This is the excuse they used to say that the media was causing mistrust, NO that was the constant attempt to sow distrust in vaccines, using ANY other medicine as long as it was not a vaccine.
It was attempted to try and find something to misdirect at and make suspicious, this time it was the media.
And it was also reported more than just being a horse paste. So its not even true.
It was a deflection and yet another part of the methods to cast suspicion and blame on anyone else.
For example it was said to have won a noble prize, SO WHAT, for treating Covid No!, insulin could have won a noble prize, the first one creating the wheel.
Giving the noble prize to something doesnt make it treat anything.
If you expect that other people have to be completely nice and respectful and understanding and never use humor as people peddle one after another NON-Solution, and will not except a thorough scientific investigation.
We not a team of psychologists, carefully finding a way to not upset people in any way shape of form, especially as they seeked for and embraced casting anything in doubt.
We are all humans, we cannot treat people all the time even if we try as if they have to be nursed and patted on the head and spoken to.
I for example am one that looked into many of these and tried to fight the onslaught of misinformation, the smearing and defaming of good people working hard.
Im not on several social media anymore because the reckless "skepticism" and flood of misinformation has tired me out completely.
And people that tries to even as friendly as possible and with care try to correct information is abused constantly. and the promotion of fraudsters like RFK jr., Weinstenn, Dr. Campbell, and many many more, that fabricates wave after wave and flood of new falsehoods. with NO effort on their part.
And HUGE effort on our part to look into it properly.
Some times we might snap or just not being perfect communicators, sorry about that!
But its a completely unrealistic bar to set.
*_"There is no such thing as a Ministry of Truth and why it is important to challenge conventional “wisdom” - A personal view"_*
As much I enjoy Joe Rogan he has tendencies towards conspiracies and mysterious which is entertaining but can get dangerous when it goes to health related topics
I mean saying big pharma cares more about profit than lives isint conspiricy
I dont agree with them saying all vaccines are bad there are good ones but also bad ones
@@boneleg6952so who do you see when you get sick? That's right, them big bad dangerous doctors, who will treat you with that poison.
Health related topics?
That would be clean real food, no drugs, medicines, chemicals, GMO's, toxins...etc....etc.....That is HEALth!!
Conspiracies are crimes and nothing more..... is there something wrong with looking to see if a crime has been committed?
Mysteries...oh you bet there are..... plenty of 'em....the biggest mystery of all is how people can be so damn gullible (and stupid) to buy into taking something that does not work, because what it is suppose to work against does not in fact exist short of the theater and propaganda by their perceived overlords
Most of what he says is wrong I won’t say if it’s lies or incompetence because I don’t know for sure but it’s really dangerous because he’s the most listened to guy in the country and people will think he’s right because he’s rich that’s a huge problem with our country we think rich people are smart and moral people and we think poor or sick people are must have done something to deserve it
He sounds like he has a frog in the throat. Is he OK? I learned that he has spasmodic dysphonia.
While kennedy was advocating for people harmed by large corporations he identifind his condition as a side affect of a vaccine ingredient.
I know you will say that there is no way to prove this. But when you live with a vaccine injury especially one that affects the way you talk or the way you see, you appreciate people who try to get to truth versus just debunking those of us struggling to find answers.
Thank you for making this video and sharing your work, I appreciate the efforts you go to in dispelling dangerous medical misinformation.
Too bad that he intentionally ignored the Burbacher study which proves Ethel mercury lodges in the brain and doesn't just leave the body. RFK directly cited the study. This UA-camr completely ignored it. Why?
Thank you so much Dr. Dan!
Great work!
Thanks so much😊
Of course you are 100% correct. None of what you mentioned requires one to have a PhD to understand or debate. Only a willingness to think for oneself and apply that pesky old scientific method of "question everything". The c*vid drones however are either in a hypnotic trance or brainwashed. Some may know the jig is up but I suspect that is wishful thinking.
4:40 With regards to methyl mercury compared with ethyl mercury. The same difference is true between methyl alcohol (methanol) and ethyl alcohol (ethanol) drinking methanol even in small quantities regularly results in blindness and other conditions, whereas ethanol in reasonable quantities doesn’t.
Apples to oranges.
@@user-tf4ho2uo1e actually it’s a comparison between the two organic parts of the molecule methyl and ethyl.
I developed vaccine induced uveitis after a flu shot 20 years ago.
Could it have been mercury that caused my partial blindness?
@@MRCAGR1 That's why I find RFK Jr's mistake forgivable. The mercury actually *is* the same, just like he said. It's the chemical bound to the mercury that's different. Nobody actually calls sodium chloride and hydrogen chloride two different kinds of *chlorine.* Whoever tried to explain the issue to RFK Jr. did a lousy job of it.
@@MichaelJPartyka it's forgivable if someone corrects him on the point and he accepts the correction. If he continues to make the claim after being told why it's incorrect, then we have to ask whether it's wilful ignorance, or deliberate dishonesty.
Dr Wilson, there were also 2 more cardiac deaths in the placebo group - myocardial infarction. So the count was 4 v 3
Yes, conveniently ignored by the malicious anti-vaxxers.
Myocardial infarction isn't a death, it's death of some of the heart muscle. But nevertheless, 3 extra deaths is completely insignificant.
@@kevinklassen4328 the two deaths were due to myocardial infarction.
@@kevinklassen4328 it was on the list of deaths though
@kevinklassen4328 extra deaths insignificant. Big claim for a small study there broseph
RFK is a lawyer. He’s not about evidence supporting a conclusion, he’s about pushing a conclusion with lies.
Thank you for this insightful video. It's a short but powerful medium of knowledge and logical reasoning.
By debunking an unqualified individual on the subject, you've done a service to everyone. The person in question is evidently clueless about what he asserts, having not acquainted himself with the science nor shown any inclination towards understanding it. His claims stand on shaky ground.
Your effort in creating this important video is commendable - please continue your work.
I pledge my full support to your endeavors. Keep going strong.
Calling an mRNA gene delivery system a vaccine is very deceptive
Thank you Dr.Wilson,your work is much appreciated.
Seems no smarter than Hotez....
@@powercatjeffy smarter than you,anyway.
@@martinurbani "I know you are but what am I"
Jeez, it's easy to debunk this dude. I quit listening as soon as he was talking about good mercury. That stuff gets into your brain.
I'm assuming he badmouthed ivm and hcq too, but it was too painful watching him fail. It's even more difficult watching this chat lap up his slobber.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not to smart if you call a mRNA gene delivery system a vaccine.
What wouldn't you let your cells manufacture?
awesome takedown
In the Canadian review paper you cite, if 69% of pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy cases analysed were not due to vaccination, then 31% of cases analysed WERE due to vaccination?
YIKES !!!
Yeah try again sunshine. "Overall, 40 patients (70.2%) had a more likely alternate cause for their encephalopathy or encephalitis than vaccination. In 9 patients (15.8%), the evidence for a more likely alternate cause was based only on presence of symptoms suggestive of an infective process (e.g., cough, coryza, wheeze, sore throat, diarrhea, and hepatomegaly, in combination or alone) unrelated to vaccination."
"For 3 patients (5.3%), there was evidence for an association with vaccine,"
"The remaining 14 patients (24.6%) classified as indeterminate did not meet criteria for alternative etiology or evidence for association with vaccine;"
So only 3 patients over 21 years were linked to the vaccines.
As there was about 4,891,000 children of the vaccination age by the study in 2001 and about an 87% vaccination rate which would mean that 4,255,170 were vaccinated in that time that would equate to a risk factor of 0.00007%.
straight from the FDA website "The FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives." Read that last line again. Then read it again Ben. You make it sound like "oh yeah if Ivermectin (or whatever generic, expired patent drug) was shown to work, it could have gotten EUA along side the vaccines and everything else" and clearly that is NOT the case. When you gloss over something like this it makes people question your integrity.
Yeah well Ivernectin still doesn’t work with COVID
@@topologyrobthey screwed up the double blind study, they gave them a choice to take them during the second and third stage of the trial.
What "certain criteria" are they talking about it..
The standard for "emergency use" is not very robust. From the same document: "Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that "may be effective" to prevent, diagnose, or treat serious or life-threatening diseases" 'MAY be effective " doesn't mean that it necessarily will BE effective.
I am a first responder. I can say for a fact there are more people with negative effects from the vaccine than people that did not get it.
Thank you very much for the time and trouble you took to explain science to the public .I am an M.D. from the UK . Brilliant
How many victims did you inject with the clot shot?
@@unvaccinated6467 rate of clots from covid infection 1:1000 .
Rate from vaccine 1:100,000.
@@roybatty8366 Citation? That's a lot of people who got clots from the vaccine. I bet they just wanted to be protected.
@@unvaccinated6467 health care provider here! 🙋♂️ have been providing vaccination to my community for over 14 years! hospital employees, coworkers, friends, neighbors, my own family and children! We are all here! ☺️
But more surprising is the breakdown in vaccine hesitancy by level of education. It finds that the association between hesitancy and education level follows a U-shaped curve with the highest hesitancy among those least and most educated. People with a master’s degree had the least hesitancy, and the highest hesitancy was among those holding a Ph.D.
What’s more, the paper found that in the first five months of 2021, the largest decrease in hesitancy was among the least educated - those with a high school education or less. Meanwhile, hesitancy held constant in the most educated group; by May, those with Ph.Ds were the most hesitant group.
So not only are the most educated people most sceptical of taking the Covid vaccine, they are also the least likely the change their minds about it…
Ironic that I knew a great guy with autism that his only signs of autism was some stuttering, but less than RF J.
RFK has a disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions, causing voice to be scratchy...not related to disability
@@mikfin210 It is a disability - he can't talk properly.
he meant it’s not a mental disability, likely remembering the president who seems to be thought to have one
Thank you for this. Quick to the point.
Ethylmercury: C2H5Hg+
Methylmercury: CH3Hg+
RFK Jr. needs to eat his own words and ‘stop this comic book description’ applied to his views on vaccines. He advocates understanding ‘the other side’ yet does none of it himself when it comes to anything scientific. He demonstrates his total lack of basic understanding of chemistry, let alone biochemistry and far beyond him to understand virology, immunology, vaccinology. And there remains no common language that each can understand each other,s ‘beef’
Very good again.
I know this must be exhausting but you are doing important crucial work explaining this stuff.
Unfortunately I think your knowledge will be needed a whole lot more in the coming years.
Thank You
😂
He's lying
@@lar7922 people are too lazy to read through the studies in good faith and realize none of them counter the points of RFK. They're just here for their confirmation bias.
Yeah, with things like ignoring all the excess deaths? This channel is for all the jab heads too find some false sense of security
He's wrong
Ty so much for this
Keep up the good work
Baaaaa 🐑
“That’s for my false sense of security, doc. Same time next week? 😵💫”
I think we're beyond referencing studies. Kenny goes into the flaws he perceives in certain studies.
To debunk him, you need to also cover who funded the studies, who those running the studies are affiliated with, are there any conflicts of interest, and then breakdown how the studies were run and whether there are any flaws in them.
So he's just moving the goal posts. First he wants studies that have saline placebos. When that was given he wanted studies on childhood vaccines that use saline placebos. When that was given now he's trying to move the goal posts again by claiming fraudulently that there are flaws.
@ingeniatorabderamus6459 he shouldn't even be moving the goal posts in the first place. That just shows he's a fraud and a liar. If he were honest he would accept his errors instead of doing what he's doing now.
Joe Rogan is asking questions. He's not a propagandaist or somebody pedaling disinformation for profit he has an inquisitive mind and he's asking questions and that's what science looks like. I'm sure he would happily have you on the podcast. The reason people like Joe Rogan so much is because he's willing to question things and he follows truth. And then he questions "the truth" and then he brings on guests that have questions about "the truth." That's what science looks like. We are currently living through an opioid crisis caused by the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA lying. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people dead because pharmaceutical companies and the FDA lied. I think it's perfectly fine to be skeptical of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. Don't you?
why did Joe Rogan not question anything RFKjr said?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Why did Bayer infect thousand with HIV leading to thousands of AIDS deaths in France, Spain, Latin America and Asia by dumping a drug the FDA withdrew from the US market in those countries.
Why did the US government conspire with Bayer to allow it to happen?
And why was no one charged or held responsible for those sacrifices to Moloch?
Finally: Whose responsibe for more deaths directly attributed to peddling false medical information..... FRK Jr or those Rotund Farmers you shill for.
@@MessiahNonEst nice attempt at irrelevant deflection. That's all you've got now, isn't it?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Sorry I forgot you don't like looking in the mirror of scientism.
Question: Why should Joe Rogan have questioned anything RFK said. Because you think RFK is lying when he claimed no placebo trials have been conducted.
Is that all you got for a three hour video you haven't watched, you took on faith what dr flunky debunky to you to believe.
@@MessiahNonEst It's a clear example of RFKjr lying, ergo, he lies.
“Vaccinating is much safer than not vaccinating” needs to be in context of which variant and patient vulnerabilities. Healthy young adults with Omicron who already have some immunity from prior infections and/or vaccinations...is the risk benefit the same there?
"In an e-mail dated 17 December 1999, Verstraeten wrote to Robert Davis and copied Frank DeStefano with the subject line, ‘It just won’t go away’; in the body of the e-mail he wrote that ‘all the harm is done in the first month'"
"Just over two months later, Verstraeten had produced a new draft of the analysis - a thirty page report titled ‘Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase 1. Verstraeten made a number of questionable judgement calls, such as excluding all children who did not receive 2 polio vaccines (which reduced the number of zero exposure patients), combining the zero exposure group with the
"Even then, the relative risk of autism for the highest exposure group (>62.5 µg) was 2.48. On 19 March 2000, Verstraeten e-mailed DeStefano to explain that he had run a separate analysis on 10 premature infants from Northern California Kaiser and found that the highest exposure group had a relative risk of developing autism of 5.0 finding of an OR of 5.4 for premature"
Among the many other things, I wish people would stop calling it the Spanish Flu. It did not originate in Spain, but Spain was neutral during WW1 and freely reported the pandemic while other countries censored the news.
Kansas City epidemic doesn’t have the same ring to it.
True. Look to the yellow brick road. It came from Kansas (probably via pigs and started on an army base). How about we call it the Good 'Ole US Flue.
@@superclaymaster but it is a great name for a funk band.
@@paulspence7600 Interestingly thats where the new vaccine was being tested... just before all those soldiers vaccinated went off to fight in the war.
Thanks
Conflict of interest.
Thanks for this
amazing content, really appreciate you posting it.
Wow, Kennedy doesn’t understand mercury. Or, for that matter, how science is done.
He doesn't understand these either
-malignant narcissism
-Dunning Kruger
-conspiracy theories
-critical thinking > cynical thinking
-the scientific method & falsification
-the difference between peer reviewed and a pre print
-difference between retrospective and prospective studies
-association is not necessarily causation
-virology
-epidemiology
-microbiology
-organic chemistry
-proteins and folding
-epistemology
-logic and constructing an argument
-logical fallacies
-cognitive biases
-Occams razor
-Hanlons razor
-Hitchens razor
-Brandolini's law/bullshit asymmetry
-sea lioning
.....is also be very hard to do.
When they took mercury out of vaccines the antivax grifters started blaming Aluminium instead. 'Aluminium builds up in your body and causes autism'.... oh really? Tell me how much there is in a vaccine compared to the antiperspirant you use every single day...
I doubt Kennedy is mentally equipped to understand anything at all. Single digit IQ shows...
True! We can observe that Science is done by spending money on PR until people take your drug.
Then there’s science, which is done by disproving hypotheses. In other words scientists are attracted to counter truths that expand their model of reality.
Zealots on the other hand are afraid of counter truths that threaten their position.
Kennedy, to my mind, was just asking questions and trying to publicize documents and studies. I really don't see the issue. He has never said Vaccines don't work or that people shouldn't take them. He wants people to be informed and to be safe.
Brilliant explanation Dr Wilson
Why don't you go to a RFK Jr. townhall and press him during a Q&A session?
Even if I don't agree with his vaccine views, he's not going to ban vaccines, and his other views concerning out country make him more than qualified to run for president. I will be voting for him. 🇺🇸 🫡
Also, thank you for this video. You got a sub.
"he's not going to ban vaccines"
Well, that's because he can't. But he will do all he can to spread vaccination doubt through his choice of key people in government agencies, and then you get the type of things that happened in Florida, where the Surgeon-General goes in and removes key parts of an analysis in order to make the COVID vaccines look bad (the removed key parts actually made them look good). You'll get companies being unwilling to sell vaccines, meaning the US population will be exposed to various infectious diseases and the associated disruption of daily life. China and Russia will watch with a mixture of happiness and concern, as a weak America is good for them, but those infectious diseases spreading around is a bad thing for all.
You need to reassess the ethics of your choice.
@@p.w.harris9883 Do I? And whom, may I ask, are you voting for that is so much better?
@@LiveStoicism I haven't decided yet. Not Joe and Not Trump is all I can say for now. Either choice would be unethical.
Contact Rogan and put him straight
Thank you for doing this
Don't thank him. He gets money to do this. Nice conflict of interest.
@Goodmorning1221- so does RFK jr. Lotta exposure helps with the voting crowd.
@@Goodmorning1221-Liar
@@Goodmorning1221-Who pays you to troll your cut-and-paste nonsense on every Wilson video?
Dr, Wilson, what is your view of Vinay Prasad?
In fairness, he did say that all he asked for was one study that showed they are safe and effective which showed a control group and cross analysis. One could not be obtained. He also stated that the rate of autism in the populous has skyrocketed since the 1960s-70s and that no one can understand why that happened.
"...and that no one can understand why that happened."
Which shows he isn't looking at the scientific literature.
And of course, he has repeatedly blamed the vaccines. First it was the thimerosal, then it was MMR, now it's the many vaccines, and he'll happily rinse and repeat these three arguments. That thimerosal is largely removed from just about all vaccines, and thus cannot explain the increase in autism at all, he doesn't care. That the MMR vaccine has repeatedly been shown not to be associated with autism, he doesn't care (he'll just cite some bad paper here and there to suggest it may, or refer to the child abuser Andrew Wakefield). That no new vaccines have been added to the schedule for decades (until recently), and thus also cannot explain a rise in autism, he does not care. He'll keep on pointing at the vaccines.
Autism only became a diagnosis in 1980, when it was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM3). In 1998 it became Austism Spectrum Disorder, in DSM4. Note that it's always been recognised it runs in families e.g. it has a genetic base
The rate is the same as it always was. Diagnoses have skyrocketed. RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods.
@@May_Day45 LOL @ "RFK is telling the truth." He wouldn't know the truth if it bit him. I wrote ....
"The rate is the same as it always was. _Diagnoses have skyrocketed._ RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods."
I notice you didn't address that.
I'll also note that ASD is a description of behavioural characteristics. Go read them. Half the people in these comments, you included, are probably on the spectrum.
I trust you now feel like someone with a severe problem, who deserves to be stigmatised by RFK
@@May_Day45 Yes, he's telling the truth! The V industry naturally pushes the notion that it is all genetic. But genetics require a TRIGGER. I think RFK allows that vaccines probably are not the ONLY contributor. Rather, maybe other environmental toxins build up & set the stage, & then 4-5 vaccines at once may push a child over the edge. Untold thousands of parents have SEEN it happen!
"Exposure to mercury can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with autism, and the similarities extend to neuroanatomy, neurotransmitters, and biochemistry."
We should thank Dr. Wilson for making all these debunking videos. It certainly would take a lot of time, energy, and effort, a distraction to his professional research life and his social and family life. I admire his stamina for mental torture in viewing those misinformation media and his iron stomach for disgusting misinformatoin adn lies. When I watch those misinformation media I would just hold my head and scream and suffer stomach pain and IBS. His ability to keep calm and cool is quite amazing to me, a more hot-headed clinical MD.
@@ingeniatorabderamus6459 I do know some researchers and busy clinicians who could jugle both. If you think that any researcher who does science communication must not be researcher and is just doing science miscommunication, think about what RFK, Jr said, "I immersed my whole life in science and I read all the papers." Of course, he did not immerse his whole life in science and he did not "read all the papers" (no human being could!), and he is communicating what??? If he really have immersed his whole life in science how could he be doing science communication? By your logic, he must be doing science miscommunication.
OK, so Dr. Wilson do not do research anymore, he just read papers and do science communication. And if you believe that RFK. Jr. "immersed my life in science and I read all the papers", why what RFK Jr. is doing is not science miscommuication? You can not have it both way.
Whether someone is doing honest science communication depends on their knowledge in the related fields, their ability to read, understand, critique, and interpret the studies, and make a conclusion based on evidence and reason. Dr. Wilson is able to and is doing all these. RFK, Jr., saddly and dangerously, is not.
@@ingeniatorabderamus6459 I would not use terms such as "impressive a degree." I have done laboratory research in neuroscience for 5 years and I have a MD degree. I have very high regard for anyone with a Ph D degree in any field of science. Getting a Ph D is no piece of cake. And I would have admiration for a Ph D in molecular biology. And molecular biology is a cornerstone in biotechnology. As you noted, Wilson does have a bachelor's degree in biotechnology before he pursue Ph D in molecular biology. Most people in the field of biotechnology are molecular biologists and geneticists, and there are also physicists, mathematicians, computer scientists, and biostatisticians...etc. in all those fields. Science nowadays are very interdisplinary. (BTW, even in the old days when I did reseach in neuroscience I have to study biochemistry, molecular biology, electrophysiology, physiology, chemistry, statistics, anatomy...etc. In that old days, some computer science people entered the field and now computational neuroscience is a vibrant field of study. Science is by nature interdisplinary, especial life sciences.)
And if you go by that logic, RFK Jr has a BA degree in American history and literature, a Master in Law, and a Doctor in Jurisprudence. Please note he has zero science education. Then that should make him highly disqualified to discuss such scientific matters and studies.
@@INTOTHETERROR Is being a You Tuber a very dishonorable way to make a living? Does being a You Tuber autimatically make one dishonest and untrustworthy? Following this logic, does making a living as a podcaster, like Joe Rogan doing now, automatically make him dishonest and untrustworthy? What makes him untrustworthy is his lack of knowledge in a lot of the things he talks about in the fields of science and medicine, not because he makes a living as a successful podcaster. I do not "foam from the mouth" because someone has a Ph D. I just give them some respect, and more respect if they show that they are knowledgeable, fair, honest, and communication science well. There are certainly Ph Ds and MDs whom I do not respect (and I am a MD). E.g. Robert Malone, MD for his distortion of history, false claims, and misinformations.
@@ingeniatorabderamus6459 I know that you did not mention RFK Jr. Since we are talking about this subject in the comments section of a video featuring RFK Jr. I used him as a example / representative. As I have pointed out molecular biology is a corner stone in biotechnology (and other specialties like genetics, immunology, virology, and bacterology...etc.) If you do not agree with that, I don't know what to say. And if you think someone with a Ph D in molecular biology (please understand that to get a Ph D in molecular biology one would have to spend a number of years in a research lab) and someone with no history of any science education or lab research experience has the same footing in discussion of the scientific matters that are the subject of the above video, again, I don't know what to say.
@@ingeniatorabderamus6459 Let me correct my sentence to: if you think someone with a Ph D in molecular biology (please understand that to get a Ph D in molecular biology one would have to spend a number of years in a research lab) and someone with no history of any science education or lab research experience has similar footing in discussion of the scientific matters that are the subject of the above video, again, I don't know what to say. I guess we would have to agree to disagree.
I certainly agree with the idea that when it comes to public health (since this video is about public health) proper balance of benefits, risk, saftely is the goal of any policy. Certainly there is no place for adolescent posturing in such discussions and debates.
It’s interesting that RFK says that the wi-fi tumors are always on the victim’s ear. Kinda telling considering that you spend significantly more time with your phone in your hand than next to your ear, and yet he doesn’t even mention a tumor appearing on people’s hands. His argument is both scientifically and logically incorrect
It would definitely be illogical if all tissues in our body are equally likely to react the same way in response to stimuli.
It would be nice if someone smart like this could debate the scientific validity of this statement.
Good observation
Or like, over our entire bodies since most public spaces have public wifi nowadays and we are constantly exposed to cell phone network wavelengths everywhere we go...so where is the million percent spike in body-wide cancer his belief should be leading to?
But, hey, if this keeps MAGATs from reading less of the Orange Demon's batshit tweets, I'm all for the right giving up their phones and turning off their WiFi.
Or in men on their buttocks
It's important to note, people who use "science" and "I am doctor" or maybe "I agree with the science", should be treated with scepticism. Just from the description you can tell this guy is a "follow the government guidelines" kind of person. He either has to believe what he's saying, which means he's about as knowledgeable as you, but he read a book, or he's a grifter. I suspect a person who trust authority figures and will "listen and believes".
If he's so confident, then he should debunk Stefan Lanka's work on virology methodologies. This guys either not very wise or a shill.
You are right in what you are saying in many ways. 😅
Amazing video, even with your commentary spliced between them talking oh my god was it hard to listen to them talk
Thank you Dr. Wilson!
Very very good thank you.