---- Description (sources used) continued --- Cell phones don’t cause brain tumors or damage the blood brain barrier: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.20702 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017310000718?via%3Dihub Why you should get vaccinated even if previously infected: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04865-0 www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00159-7 www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175 More on germinal centers: www.nature.com/articles/s41577-021-00657-1 Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID: www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483 bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5 jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362 Vitamin D doesn’t work for COVID: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0267918 www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071230 jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779952 How influenza causes secondary bacterial pneumonia: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642581/ AZT is an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC386922/pdf/pnas00325-0322.pdf Anti-retroviral cocktails save lives: ourworldindata.org/art-lives-saved Christine Maggiore’s story: www.latimes.com/local/la-me-christine-maggiore30-2008dec30-story.html Some pharmacovigilance of COVID vaccines: www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext drive.google.com/file/d/1_wHIYX-tGkGBPwuax7N8BxZPR4PTTCDm/view www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475 The 1976 flu vaccine story: www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976 The FDA is not “funded” by big pharma (CORRECTION: second source here should have been included in the video): www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=6bc1186549ec www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2786 Basics of Autism: www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928 www.spectrumnews.org/news/new-studies-reveal-how-autism-might-alter-synapse-formation-pruning/ Song used for outro: Fan-made piece
OK Dr. Willson just a little question about "drinking chlorine... " I understood the larger point you were trying to make and of course I agree ... but ... just how do you drink a gas 😅? pretty sure you would die from the effects of inhaling it first. Also, your stomach isn't going to break down chlorine gas into hydrochloric acid, your stomach produces hydrochloric acid and a thick layer of mucus which is why your stomach doesn't digest itself. However if you swallow large quantities of hydrochloric acid you're going to have problems. But many of our medications are compounded with small amounts of hydrochloric acid.
Both sides can say the exact same thing you said. That’s why it’s extremely important to research both sides with extreme thoroughness, and not listen to one side alone, or with bias. Bc it is very difficult to clean up messes.
If I had ever contracted hepatitis B, I would not have been able to be treated with the drug that has been suppressing my multiple sclerosis progression for the last six years. I actually, without realizing it, missed some of the doses - I missed half the school year in seventh grade - and didn’t realize I wasn’t protected, but fortunately, herd immunity seems to have kept me safe. Now, I am immunosuppressed, but despite the risk to me, my ex - who is a huge RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan fan - had a veritable hissy fit when I asked him to get a full STI screening before we had sex. Despite the fact that he is a former IV drug user. This was shocking and frankly inexplicable to me, at the time, but I guess it makes a little more sense now - ex was mainlining this bullsh*t. Anyway, happy ending, the relationship terminated unconsummated.
This was a really good explanation and breakdown on RFK’s claims. I’m now leaning more against his claims on vaccines. However, something that I would’ve liked to see differently is when considering if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a resounding YES. You talk about how usually the questions he asks (we all ask) have already been asked and answered by a scientist somewhere, and debated in an office, classroom, water cooler, etc. Well the average person doesn’t have access to those conversations and that’s what we want to hear. We don’t want to continue with the “trust the experts” narrative. Sure, they might be right most of the time, but we want to understand it as well. We want to have access to those conversations, that’s how we get less distrustful. And what better way to do so than to have a debate with someone who has strong opposing views on the matter. When asked if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a YES, absolutely. There should be nothing to lose if we’re doing it in the name of curiosity, science and knowledge.
That is exactly the problem. RFK debating a scientist is exactly what he wants, especially a live debate. To the viewer, it makes it appear that RFK is on a similar level to a scientist before the debate had even started. When it does begin, RFK merely needs to go outside of the scope of the scientists field of expertise, or the scope of debate. Once he does, it is very easy for him to make whatever claim he likes without fear of contradiction. This is exactly what happened with Monkton when he debated a climate scientist live. Another outcome occured with Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, where Ham used a whole array of debating tactics, fallacies, and forged evidence. As soon as anyone bothered to check the claims of Ham, they quickly found that he had made most of it up. A proper scientific debate is a lot more rigid though. It is slower for starters. Claims always need to be backed up with sources, and every source has the time to be checked. The whole point is to expose errors and find out what is right and wrong. This is the exact opposite of what RFK wants.
@@philo3479You have no idea what deflection is, do you? It's the same topic. Funnily enough, this is also a debating tactic used during live debates. A face to face debate is not necessary to review and debate evidence. This is regularly done in the scientific literature. RFK could also respond in video format to any of the videos made debunking him, which would therefore start a debate. So why doesn't he go ahead and do it?
Wrong. It’s impossible to ‘debate’ somebody who just makes shit up, as RFKJr continuously does. The scientist will be bound by things like truth, evidence, and reality; while this Q-uack’s objective is to obfuscate those. A perfect example is when he lies about his private conversations with others, as he did with Rogan concerning Dr. Offit. If you were Joe and - unlike Joe - wanted your podcast to be factually-accurate, how could you possibly fact-check RFKJr in realtime about that conversation? You absolutely couldn’t, so it would come across as him scoring a point that you couldn’t refute. Bottom line is that you simply cannot debate fundamentally dishonest people, especially when their audiences don’t care whether the claims are accurate or not.
21:18 I was at school in the early 1960’s and neither autism or ADHD were recognised. Anyone showing signs of these conditions was considered a disruptive influence or a daydreamer or worse.
@@Unvaccinated69 what do you mean by autism? I worked with adults with learning disabilities including autism. We are not talking about high functioning autism such as Asperger’s, those affected people are effectively behind an impenetrable barrier. A colleague of mine was high functioning and was working as a paramedic. Autism is a spectrum of signs and symptoms. Older people could be on the spectrum but have managed throughout their lives so why would they need a specific diagnosis?
@@Unvaccinated69That is an unenlightened view, one of many things you don't understand is social media didn't exist, so you simply didn't hear about it, and the stigma around having a child like that kept them hidden, that is until schools were created for them, huge signs saying, Spastic Centre, and they were transported in vehicles with, Spastic Bus in big letters up the side, many were abandoned into orphanages, I spent a large part of the 70's with my Father taking abandoned children out once a month, that is where I first experienced the damage caused by Thalidomide.
Go eat either mercury. Both will kill you - This is embarrassing like people trying to sell you a bridge. the experimental drug is bad. no ifs ands or buts
Why does Apple not recommend holding your phone up to your head? From your iPhone legal document To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.
Because of an abundance of caution. Every building, car, and business in California has a cancer warning on it. If you hold an dosimeter (reads for radioactivity) it won't read anything from an iphone. Not all radiation is radioactive. There are going to be random correlations that look like there are patterns but are just as I said random. This can be explained as "dartboard statistics" where you throw a whole bunch of darts on a barn and then draw the target after. Otherwise we have to believe that everything everywhere causes cancer.
This is essentially legalese to protect themselves from liability in case RFK types try to sue them with spurious correlations in cell phone usage and cancer rates. Apple has probably not tested the RF frequency exposures with every single type of cell phone case out there, many made by third parties, so this is just a blanket warming against possible liability. Though as a physicist, I cannot for the life of me imagine how even a metal case could change the RF enough to even get close to approaching dangerous levels. Remember anything up to 300 GHz is withing safe guidelines, which is miles away from even 5 GHz, which is the highest frequencies that most cell phones use
@@ValleyDragonit even mentions some cases made of metal. I imagine they wrote this to protect them from shoddy third party companies who produce phone cases with unforseen side effects that people might blame on apple themselves. Not that a simple metal case could possibly turn harmless radio waves into dangerous ionizing radiation, but this is a legal document, not a peer reviewed study.
why is no one going after Kennedy for his responsibility in the measles outbreak in Somoa a few years back? Kids directly died after Kennedy's visit there a few months earlier???
I'd written this for another comment, saw yours, so I've just re-posted here From about 2010, there was a sustained anti Vx campaign in Samoa, led mainly by traditional faith healers. Immunisation rates dropped. In 2018 2 infants were given a shot, using muscle relaxant instead of saline, with the obvious tragic consequences. The nurses responsible did prison time, Vx rates plummeted. In 2019 they had a measles outbreak. In 6000 cases, 83 people died, 80 of them under 4 years old. You can see in those numbers it wasn't just newborns, who were not protected in 2018/2019. It took out a wide range of children, and some adults. RFK turned up in Samoa about 6 months before the outbreak, many people blame him. But you can see he was just using the 2018 event, as an opportunistic way to get publicity. He's of course is fully protected, as are his family. It's likely he uses the A-V thing, mainly for money and fame. But he doesn't trumpet his involvement in Samoa, or even mention it. For the obvious reason Incidentally, Samoa had a 99% immunisation rate for CV
@@Muritaipet I know he doesn't mention it which indicates his guilt in doing as such. What I don't get is why no one else does either. It's not going to be easy for him to respond to although I am sure he's anitivaxxer supporters won't care...
@@robertchflynn I really thought Samoa would be the end of the A-V nonsense. It's so fundamentally clear what happened. I was then absolutely horrified by the nonsense they came out with afterwards, to justify why their precious fantasy was being proven wrong. That's when I started challenging them. RFK wrote to the Samoan Prime Minister during the outbreak, and mass vaccination campaign that stopped it. He said the outbreak was actually being caused by the vaccines. I fundamentally agree with you BTW. I'd like to see RFK do time.
Again, thank you for being so generous with your time and so patient listening to people who don’t know what they’re talking about so you can help others sort through the pile of garbage. From what I can gather, listening with my screen reader, this video came out before The news about Robert F Kennedy having had a worm eat part of his brain, and before he told his story about picking up a young bear that was roadkill. There is something wrong with his thinking. Thank you for presenting some history of previous anti-vaccination movements as well. During the aids epidemic in the late 80s, early 90s, I remember arguing with someone in one of the AOL chat rooms. he came back with“So, your scientist can beat up my scientist?“ That is still happening here. I thank God for you. Maybe one day if enough people call out the liars and hypocrites, they will be seen for what they are. Grifters and charlatans.
The idea of a “live debate” is really stupid. RFK will just pull out some new “study” that no one has heard of, and the scientist will have no time to read it and critique it. So if they insist on a debate, it should be done more like a legal trial. You must submit your evidence ahead of time for the other side to read. And then stick to that.
Exactly. He will also accuse people of being in the pocket of Big Pharma, and denial of that being the cause, no matter how truthful, is just going to be used as another opportunity to attack the scientist. Just see how RFK Jr just throws around that Offit made hundreds of millions from the rotavirus vaccine - with reckless disregard for the truth - and will never ever correct that false claim. There's no need for him to do so, his acolytes will not care, those on the fence won't know, and those who DO know it is false see him as a disinformer already anyway.
@neverforget1971 he's not crying. Dishonest bad faith actors being able to take advantage of certain debates formats is just a reality. Sorry little trolly bud
4:40 With regards to methyl mercury compared with ethyl mercury. The same difference is true between methyl alcohol (methanol) and ethyl alcohol (ethanol) drinking methanol even in small quantities regularly results in blindness and other conditions, whereas ethanol in reasonable quantities doesn’t.
@@MRCAGR1 That's why I find RFK Jr's mistake forgivable. The mercury actually *is* the same, just like he said. It's the chemical bound to the mercury that's different. Nobody actually calls sodium chloride and hydrogen chloride two different kinds of *chlorine.* Whoever tried to explain the issue to RFK Jr. did a lousy job of it.
@@MichaelJPartyka it's forgivable if someone corrects him on the point and he accepts the correction. If he continues to make the claim after being told why it's incorrect, then we have to ask whether it's wilful ignorance, or deliberate dishonesty.
@@andrewfinlay5160Rhetorical effectiveness isn’t the same as scientific knowledge or being correct. Maybe it wouldn’t go well for him, still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
Below are just some of the studies that show negative biological effects of Radiofrequency or Wifi radiation. While Non-ionizing radiation does not carry enough energy to remove an electron from an atom or molecule that does not mean that it can't have biological effects. Near infrared light has been shown to have positive biological effects while Wifi and Radiofrequency have been shown to have neagtive biological effects. For exampole: Wifi and RF waves have been shown to increase the amount of Reactive Oxygen Species in sperm cells which can damage the DNA as mentioned in one of the studies below. So saying that Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause DNA damage is not true. The damage is not caused by heating from these waves because the energy produced from phones is insignificant. It is well described the possible methodology of how these Electromagnetic waves could affect our mitochondria. You also said that the radiations needs to be strong enough to penetrate through your skin. This is now how this works. Low frequency waves tend to penetrate materials more effectively than high frequency waves. For example, radio waves (which are low frequency) can penetrate walls and buildings, while higher frequency waves like X-rays are more likely to be absorbed or scattered by the materials they encounter. I advocate more quality studies to be done in this area (studies that do not have conflict of interest!) and to take precautionary measures against Wifi and RF waves. It is important to note that being very close to the source of radiation is unadvised. Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication (link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1019150510840) Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211026781) Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000133) Exercise ameliorates hippocampal damage induced by Wi-Fi radiation; a biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical study (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061823000224) The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function (rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml)
Man am I ever glad no one ever wants or wanted to appoint him head of any government agency, that person would have to be insane to even suggest they would do that to the country
At 6:07 you note that "pretty much all the mercury is excreted" and from that you draw the conclusion that ethylmercury is safe. This is an incorrect way of reasoning, because it may be the non-excreted mercury that does the damage. From the 2002 "Three Faces of Mercury" paper by the University of Rochester in New York by the Department of Environmental Medicine: "Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury more rapidly than methyl mercury, but the latter produces more brain damage."
I direct you to the 3 papers cited in the 2 minutes before this time stamp you have here (three separate trials looking at neurological outcomes in fairly large population trials), rather than this descriptive paper you cite that has a few case reports of ethyl mercury exposures in much higher doses with a completely different method of ingestion (a serious of ivig infusions and plasma infusions). Those three papers aren’t just higher order types of data (larger sample size, an actual testable hypothesis, etc), they are also published after this 2002 paper you cite
@@ziachoudhury4769 Thank you for the papers. I have no challenge to their shared conclusion (i.e. that cognitive impairment is not associated with low-level thimerosal exposure in children). However, this conclusion is not the same thing as saying that ethylmercury is safe (the 2nd paper says as much in its conclusion). There are large studies that draw the same conclusion for methylmercury exposure in children (e.g. Llop 2016, Myers 1998 & 2020, Patel 2019, Stratakis 2020, Vejrup 2022). However, I think you would probably agree with me that such studies do not provide a basis to say that methylmercury is safe. As one of the papers that Wilson cites says: "no controlled studies of low-dose ethylmercury toxicity in humans have been conducted" (Hviid 2003 via Tamma 2009). This is because ethylmercury has traditionally been considered to have a similar safety profile to methylmercury (they differ by only one carbon atom), and so such controlled studies are not performed because they are considered reckless and dangerous. Wilson's claim that ethylmercury leaves the body much quicker than methylmercury is true, but such blood-based analyses don't tell the whole mercury-bioaccumulation picture. Critically, when we look at primate models of ethylmercury vs methylmercury vaccines (Burbacher 2005), the words of the researchers note that: "there was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)" and that data from the "study support the prediction that, although little accumulation of Hg in the blood occurs over time with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur. Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid, given the significantly slower half-life of Hg in the brain as observed in the infant macaques."
@@lenschulwitz1934 According to the study you're citing "A much lower brain concentration of total Hg was observed in the thimerosal monkeys compared with the MeHg monkeys, that is, a 3- to 4-fold difference for an equivalent exposure of Hg. Moreover, total Hg is cleared much more rapidly from the brain after thimerosal than after MeHg exposure (24 vs. 60 days)." The conclusions are that safety drawn from blood clearance does not show the full picture is correct, since it does clear more slowly in the brain than in the blood (but it still clears more quickly than MeHg). Though the composition of the thimerosal ethyl Hg is different than the MeHg (dealkalination, etc. making potentially less toxic). We need more data is what the study was saying. All subsequent data show no link between autism and thimerosal, per the studies provided in description of vid, so this does not really matter. Especially since, as stated, they've removed thimerosal from "required" vaccinations.
@@pierremilot8117 a lower concentration of total Hg from thimerosal in the brain, but a "higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)". Inorganic mercury is widely suspected of causing neurological defects. The paper also notes that the desire to study the link to autism has been "abandoned" which the authors find "difficult to understand, given our current limited knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental neurotoxicity of thimerosal".
@@donsantiagoramoncajal1199 right or wrong RFK is able to question the narrative. There is to much evidence that the scales of justice were heavily weighted towards mRNA and big pharma profits. We simply want to follow the money.
@@donsantiagoramoncajal1199 So that millions of people, including sceptics can see/hear the arguments for themselves. It would be more productive. It's like left vs right. People talk about each other but not to each other. And a lot of money would go to the charity that the scientist picks.
No you don't. In that type of bad faith "debate," the liar can still come out looking Iike the "winner," based on the rhetoric tricks they use, the environment of the debate, etc. It's likely a no-win situation for the scientist involved, even if he has all the facts behind him.
@@DNorbs7 it's ok. You can not argue with facts. And if the science can show one person one bit of knowledge that changes their opinion then the exercise is worth the effort. I'm sure a person armed with facts will not get hoodwinked by rhetoric.
@@jackthepickledhound RFK is lying through his teeth, he's not questioning any narrative. He's absolutely bat shit crazy and has been debunked many times over the decades by many people. Even Scientific American has written articles about him, about how badly he has damaged scientific discourse. Any debate with him would be just a constant stream of "you're wrong" and "it doesn't work that way" from the scientists. It would be like a constitutional judge debating Trump on whether the election was stolen. You don't debate crazies, they're not worth it.
This is a great video and hopefully serves as a good example to not only the scientific community, but all of academia. We are living in a time where science is being faced with greater scrutiny than it has in past decades. It is a much better use of your time breaking down the nuance of misinformation, rather than making outright attempts to silence it. This channel will hopefully grow an act as a voice against public confusion.
His refutation of RFK's claims, are not true. None of the children's vaccines found in the schedule have been tested against true placebos in stage 3. None of them. They have all been tested against other vaccines or substances which can be harmful. Have you bothered to check it out or do you just believe what they tell you?
Anyone else looking for that good morning guy or the one who spams that comment about lobsters in here? I was reading the comments on another video on this channel and those guys each have over ONE THOUSAND comments on his videos alone. Terrifying how obsessed those dudes are
Good god, that moron from hell was posting his cut-and-paste boldfaced/italicized nonsense within minutes of this video going up yesterday, and I wore my typing fingers out challenging him!
The lobster guy is Rab J. He's purely one of those " mythical Norwegian creatures " (YT hates the word, but if it's not obvious, search the term.) Generally, if you ignore them, they just go away. GM1221 appears to be a genuine denier of a number of proven medical things. I really enjoy mocking him, but it's not worth engaging with him. It's impossible to win an argument with someones imagination.
He lets people talk put their 2 cents in. This whole I don’t agree with so you so not be allowed to talk crap has got to stop. The problem is everyone wants to control what other people are doing and saying. If you don’t like the info change the channel. What RFK is saying is once you understand how the whole medical data system works you understand it will always side with whoever is funding it. Because they need that conclusion to generate more money for more funding. So you don’t necessarily get 100% accurate data. The data is skewed to support whoever’s funding it. Let’s say I’m a company I hire a scientist to research something for me and his findings will literally put me out of business. I’m not going to make that data public I’m gonna go hire another scientist to figure out how not to come to that conclusion. I will promise him more funding for a project that he wants in the future and the cycle continues. What the vaccine has done is made doctors that are coming up on retirement question everything that they’ve been reading for years. We’re at that level that every system is so corrupt you can’t trust anything. When do you have a system where politicians can be bought nothing is organic or legitimate it’s always gonna be skewed for profit.
There are numerous conflicting studies and a deeper discussion about toxicology to be had. As I’ve said before. It is almost impossible to locate ONE cause of mounting problems because there are so many environmental toxins.
While kennedy was advocating for people harmed by large corporations he identifind his condition as a side affect of a vaccine ingredient. I know you will say that there is no way to prove this. But when you live with a vaccine injury especially one that affects the way you talk or the way you see, you appreciate people who try to get to truth versus just debunking those of us struggling to find answers.
Vincent is too worried about retaining his NIH funding to ever be honest or objective about anything...especially in regards to Covid origins. Plus Vincent really just wants to continue to do his GOF/GOFROC research in NYC at Columbia University without any oversight or regulations. Regardless, especially in the context of the past few years with mRNA vaccines, the "anti-vaxxer" label really just indicates that the person using it as a pejorative is either a simpleton or a shill. Why? There are a wide range of vaccine types for a wide array of virus types with a wide array of immune responses, durability, and safety profiles. So you have to evaluate each and every vaccine on its own merits. In general, vaccines for slow mutating non-zoonotic viruses with long incubation times tend to be more effective and durable than vaccines for fast mutating zoonotic respiratory viruses with short incubation times like Sars-Cov-2. The more epitopes of multiple proteins from a virus that vaccines use, the broader the immune response with less likelihood of antigen escape. So an inactivated or attenuated vaccine using the whole virus with all of its proteins is going to provide a broader immune response that’s harder to evade than a vaccine that relies on only a few epitopes of a single protein of a virus. The Sars-Cov-2 mRNA vaccines rely on only a few epitopes of spike (S) protein’s receptor binding domain [RBD] and N-terminal domain [NTD] for its antigen. The NTD and RBD are the portions of this fast mutating single strand RNA virus that mutate the most. Furthermore, we’ve aggrandized all the successful vaccines for viruses. Though we don’t even recognize all the failed attempts to make vaccines for a number of different viruses including Hep C, HiV, Epstein Barr, MERS, Sars-1, West Nile, Norovirus, Herpes HSV-1, etc. Vaccines are not always successful. More often they’re not.
WiFi can cause cancer if it’s powerful enough more likely to just give you an internal sunburn like if you walk in front of one of those big white cones on radio towers You might be thinking about microwaves
People who tend to not do adequate research and have no idea what they're talking about, loooove to use the word pseudoscience. They think it makes them look smarter, when in actually they appear very uninformed.
At 10:25, you say that the DPT vaccine "has never been pulled" and that it never caused damage, but RFK was talking about the whole-cell DPT vaccine (which was pulled in 1996) and not the acellular DTap and Tdap vaccines you are referring to. Also, a paper put out in 1994 by the National Academy of Medicine said that there was a lack of sufficient evidence either for or against neurological damage from the DPT vaccines. The lawsuits and accused damage were the impetus for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Acellular pertussis vac was discontinued due to fear of significant adverse effects but not because there was an actual proof of rare but significant adverse effects Much of the impetus for this research has been the concern that pertussis vaccine could cause significant and permanent neurological damage. Recent reviews of these data do not support such an association (2) but the desire for an alternate vaccine continues because of the high rate of minor local and systemic adverse reactions following pertussis immunization . Benefit vs risk ratio was still overwhelmingly in favor of cellular vaccine . Just that accelular was better now there are thoughts of bringing older vaccine back because of higher effectiveness .
This youtuber is a shill who thinks he's smarter than he actually is. Unlike most politicians, at least RFK has the balls to actually stand up to the corruption in EPA, big pharma, and politics as a whole. It's wild they would rather have a dementia puppet or orange man over someone with an actual track record. As for the the poster above me. Covid was the perfect example of politics and money, as well as twisted policies and pressure influencing the said "rarity" of negative effects and said "efficacy" of said vaccines. They also censored and deplatormed everyone and ANYONE talking negative about it or having negative experiences. Literally social media had carte Blanche to shut any account or Facebook group down. I was a part of about 5 groups that had daily events of adverse effects and doctors, out of fear refused to acknowledge these random neurological or cardiac symptoms as anything but some sudden event that was unrelated to the shot. I know personally nurses AND doctors who were fired for speaking their mind about it. This didn't happen in a vacuum and if you think it did then you're just spreading the real misinformation.
@debunkthefunkwithdrwilson awesome compilation ! It must have been miserable for you to watch the narrative on media twist and turn so inaccurately through the process in 2020. I was already OSHA certified in filtration at the time so it seamed like madness for everyone wearing masks. I knew they were not only ineffective, but gave people false confidence resulting in potentially spreading Covid19 faster🤦🏼♂️ . I posted a manufacturer product limitations sheets showing this and was censored. Just for showing product limitations! RFK is a strong advocate for freedom of speech and proponent of engaging in conversation . It would be great to hear you 2 break it down . I am still confused about basics like if COVID19 MRNA is technically a vaccine if it doesn't prevent transmission? Would it be more accurate to call it a treatment?
There’s no point. Irresponsible prevaricators like RFK will just call scientists liars, despite his inability to produce any scientific refutation. He is full of excrement
@@lukerichardson2404 Yup. As a side note, it's scary how there are 4 replies to this comment and yet yours is the only one I can see, aside from the one I wrote.
Among the many other things, I wish people would stop calling it the Spanish Flu. It did not originate in Spain, but Spain was neutral during WW1 and freely reported the pandemic while other countries censored the news.
Thank you for this insightful video. It's a short but powerful medium of knowledge and logical reasoning. By debunking an unqualified individual on the subject, you've done a service to everyone. The person in question is evidently clueless about what he asserts, having not acquainted himself with the science nor shown any inclination towards understanding it. His claims stand on shaky ground. Your effort in creating this important video is commendable - please continue your work. I pledge my full support to your endeavors. Keep going strong.
In the Canadian review paper you cite, if 69% of pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy cases analysed were not due to vaccination, then 31% of cases analysed WERE due to vaccination? YIKES !!!
Yeah try again sunshine. "Overall, 40 patients (70.2%) had a more likely alternate cause for their encephalopathy or encephalitis than vaccination. In 9 patients (15.8%), the evidence for a more likely alternate cause was based only on presence of symptoms suggestive of an infective process (e.g., cough, coryza, wheeze, sore throat, diarrhea, and hepatomegaly, in combination or alone) unrelated to vaccination." "For 3 patients (5.3%), there was evidence for an association with vaccine," "The remaining 14 patients (24.6%) classified as indeterminate did not meet criteria for alternative etiology or evidence for association with vaccine;" So only 3 patients over 21 years were linked to the vaccines. As there was about 4,891,000 children of the vaccination age by the study in 2001 and about an 87% vaccination rate which would mean that 4,255,170 were vaccinated in that time that would equate to a risk factor of 0.00007%.
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Same as the funding given to Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu to create a deadly flu (coronavirus) at the Wu funded by NIAID. Government does not produe an income of its own, all government and government agencies are paid through taxes: what exactly is the point you are trying to make. Tax payer pay for the same regulatory bodies to manufacture the disease with tax dollars then then produce the treatment for that disease using tax dollars. You really should be taking that issue up with that government and industry you trust so much.
@@MessiahNonEst Ooh you are a clever clogs, NFT says it is our taxes (true) you ultimately agree with him but have to do a little patronising explanation of how government is funded. Did you just find that out?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman "I have no idea" No need to tell me, I've had plenty of first hand of your "I have no idea" Research: no idea Use the Internet to research: no idea Acronym refering to medical conditions: no idea That Ben Hu began the flu from a lab in Wu: no idea That 50% is negative not a positive in regards to safety: no idea. I've got a bullet proof jacket that only stops 50% - ever second shot - half the bullets penertrate, for sale. Only worn onne, a few holes approx 9mm in diameter, two holes #45, the owner no longer needs is as they died from a bullet wound. You interested?
RFK jr mentions a study where they tested monkeys and found that ethyl-mercury (or methyl?) indeed left the blood quickly but upon autopsy were found in large concentrations in the brain. it would be nice for you to address this as well..
Found in the brain, but decreases over time. There's also no evidence it does anything to hamper development either. People just see "mercury" and enter panic mode without thinking. That's how RFK Jr. gets you.
That study was in the early 2000’s and thimerosal was removed from most vaccines in 2001. A great example of scientists identifying a potential risk, testing for it, and then action being taken to make vaccines safer. Isn’t that a good thing? Wouldn’t it be more worrisome if they never found anything wrong with the vaccines?
“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations” “If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die." - $leepy Joey Bribe’m, 2001
@@lw1zfog - COVID in 2001? , I don't remember that pandemic but Orange Mussolini did have good suggestions for the more recent pandemic (2020) "..we hit the body with a tremendous...ultraviolet light or just very powerful light...supposed we brought the light inside the body...and I see disinfectant knocks it out in a minute and is there a way we can do something like that...by injection inside or almost a cleaning..." Then Orange (courtroom sleepy) Mussolini admits to Bob Woodward that he knew COVID was "deadly stuff" but "I wanted to always play it down". Translation, he lied to the people he was supposed to protect.
Your fallacy is: appeal to authority. I don't care if the highschool dropout is right and the president of NASA is wrong. Arguments stand and fall on their own merits.
44:12 in the U.K. most of our regulatory agencies such as the MHRA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) get most of their funding from the industries that they regulate. In fact the CAA is required to obtain all of its funding from the fees it charges, which includes annual airworthiness tests on aircraft. I’m not sure about the MHRA, I would think that it was 75% at least.
All these people complaining about pharma companies paying for their submissions to be assessed never seem able to come up with who should pay for it. It's kind of strange that they want pharma companies to be subsidised by having someone else pay for this process.
The media have been captured by big pharma, CNN, MSNBC, and the other big media outlets all brought to you by Pfizer, stands to reason you are only going to hear what Pfizer wants you to hear. Make them liable for their products and see the change that takes place. Pfizer are the proud holders of the largest fine for fraudulent practices, $2.3 billion in 2009. They have also admitted that the vaccines can be shed, so be careful who you snuggle up close to..
How about the billions of dollars in profits the pharmaceutical companies make. And instead of paying 130 billions of dollars to fund foreign wars we put that money towards our public health agencies… just a thought
straight from the FDA website "The FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives." Read that last line again. Then read it again Ben. You make it sound like "oh yeah if Ivermectin (or whatever generic, expired patent drug) was shown to work, it could have gotten EUA along side the vaccines and everything else" and clearly that is NOT the case. When you gloss over something like this it makes people question your integrity.
The standard for "emergency use" is not very robust. From the same document: "Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that "may be effective" to prevent, diagnose, or treat serious or life-threatening diseases" 'MAY be effective " doesn't mean that it necessarily will BE effective.
Why don't you go to a RFK Jr. townhall and press him during a Q&A session? Even if I don't agree with his vaccine views, he's not going to ban vaccines, and his other views concerning out country make him more than qualified to run for president. I will be voting for him. 🇺🇸 🫡 Also, thank you for this video. You got a sub.
"he's not going to ban vaccines" Well, that's because he can't. But he will do all he can to spread vaccination doubt through his choice of key people in government agencies, and then you get the type of things that happened in Florida, where the Surgeon-General goes in and removes key parts of an analysis in order to make the COVID vaccines look bad (the removed key parts actually made them look good). You'll get companies being unwilling to sell vaccines, meaning the US population will be exposed to various infectious diseases and the associated disruption of daily life. China and Russia will watch with a mixture of happiness and concern, as a weak America is good for them, but those infectious diseases spreading around is a bad thing for all.
"Seems like a great opportunity to put it to rest once and for all." We've had a multitude of debates of creationists vs evolutionary biologists over the last few decades. Despite the latter bringing all the evidence, some 40% of all Americans still deny evolution. Kennedy has had plenty of discussions with experts in the field, and yet he STILL blames thimerosal for autism. Debate is what he wants, as he can use it to claim there still is uncertainty (why else would there be debate?!). It's the exact same thing climate pseudoskeptics do, and how the tobacco industry spread doubt.
That's cute but very naive. That video illustrates that every thing rfk says has already been debates and proven wrong for some time and yet rfk still tells the same lies. The problem is ppl like rfk are too deluded to believe truth.
@@danielplainview6527 Eh? evolution vs creationism is measurable info. Vaccines not causing autism is measurable info. Climate change due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is measurable info. Doesn't stop people from going for debates where they deny all that data. Notably, often with some appeal to emotion, like "atheism is bad, evolution is atheism, so reject evolution", "people who deny vaccines cause autism are bought and paid for by Big Pharma, don't believe them", and "AGW is all about extortion taxes from people, and to give government more power".
Thank you for making this effort. I know it can feel like pissing into a relentless hurricane of misinformation at times, but your voice matters man. Keep up the great/essential work.
@@lindaward This man suppose to be a scientist but never discusses real health and how to stay healthy. That shows who he works for. He knows nothing about human health.
@@amyalewinehe knows his chemical elements for sure, but what’s wrong with Kennedy asking questions? Especially after all these mothers confront him about things they noticed with their kids?
I don't get why RFKjr. is constantly saying, - he is not anti-vaccine - he is so open and looking to search out the best and latest science - "show me where I'm wrong" What does he say to these very obvious criticisms of his words?
he's been shown where he's wrong so many times but just carries on as if nothing happened and continues spouting lies. Case in point: he claims (as you can see in this video) that vaccines don't undergo place-controlled clinical studies but you can look at the covid vaccine clinical trials that are published online and see that they are place-controlled using saline. He relies on his followers being too stupid to even check I guess.
I cant validate everything but Dr. Wilson did misrepresent Rogans statement on vitamin D being a cure for Covid. Cuz Rogan never said "if u replace the Vitamin D in a sick person they will get better." As Wilson claims he did. @29:46 Rogan was talking about it as a preventative only, and never with certainty, just him talking about his logic of them being linked.
He also misrepresented rogan claiming that ivermectin helped him... He said he took it and other things and he got better quickly, he never claimed that ivermection was the reason. If you are "debunking" someone you have to stick only to the facts or you debunk yourself. There are other problems with this vid that are basically the same misinformation tactics that big pharma uses, and they are no better than rfk Jr.
Yeah they act like they are so smart saying vitamin d doesn’t cure covid well duh.but if you have low d levels when infected you get way sicker that’s a fact they want to hide so you get vaxed every year
Wilson didn't say that Rogan was saying that though. He said it was a reasonable question to ask, then explained that they got an answer to that question
@@richardelliott84 I think you should listen to the time stamp I posted. He does say Rogan said it would get rid of the sickness to replace the vitamin D. Hence his metaphor about cleaning up the ashes.
"In an e-mail dated 17 December 1999, Verstraeten wrote to Robert Davis and copied Frank DeStefano with the subject line, ‘It just won’t go away’; in the body of the e-mail he wrote that ‘all the harm is done in the first month'"
"Just over two months later, Verstraeten had produced a new draft of the analysis - a thirty page report titled ‘Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase 1. Verstraeten made a number of questionable judgement calls, such as excluding all children who did not receive 2 polio vaccines (which reduced the number of zero exposure patients), combining the zero exposure group with the
"Even then, the relative risk of autism for the highest exposure group (>62.5 µg) was 2.48. On 19 March 2000, Verstraeten e-mailed DeStefano to explain that he had run a separate analysis on 10 premature infants from Northern California Kaiser and found that the highest exposure group had a relative risk of developing autism of 5.0 finding of an OR of 5.4 for premature"
@@MessiahNonEst there is absolutely 0 evidence for autism and vaccines, it was extremely scrutinized and tested because of the extreme panic, literally half if not all researchers went out of there way to see if this was true, and they found absolutely nothing to prove it. there is no exposure risk to a nueruolgical condition that isnt even related to how any vaccines functions in the body. not only that but it pushes a condition to be viewed in a negative light
Thank you for doing these videos! I was interested in hearing the buzz over RFK and saw Lex Fridman's shout-out to your channel. "Do your own research" often times seems to do more harm than good because I am not an expert! It would be preposterous for me to try to understand every single possible field when there are experts in these fields. Dr. Hotez disagreeing to debate on Rogan seems to unfortunately certify RFK Jr. and Rogan as trusted sources of information.
@@akashbhargava906 Lex gave a shout out to Dr. Wilson and others who have counter arguments to claims RFK Jr. makes. During the episode, he mostly just listened without challenging. It was good if someone desired to listen to RFK Jr.’s claims, but there wasn’t an actual discussion.
I think we're beyond referencing studies. Kenny goes into the flaws he perceives in certain studies. To debunk him, you need to also cover who funded the studies, who those running the studies are affiliated with, are there any conflicts of interest, and then breakdown how the studies were run and whether there are any flaws in them.
So he's just moving the goal posts. First he wants studies that have saline placebos. When that was given he wanted studies on childhood vaccines that use saline placebos. When that was given now he's trying to move the goal posts again by claiming fraudulently that there are flaws.
@@Somniator7 he shouldn't even be moving the goal posts in the first place. That just shows he's a fraud and a liar. If he were honest he would accept his errors instead of doing what he's doing now.
@@malcolmjelani3588 what, light? If you're still concerned, realize that not only is it just another wavelength of light (but not harmful like uv), it's also extremely dim. It's like a 20 watt bulb. Also, it's the same as radio waves, and those have been bouncing around and going right through your body continuously for your whole life, that's how radios and TV, and even cell phones, work. Remember, cell phones are really just walkie talkies that connect to very sophisticated towers, just hand held radios, there's nothing special going on. These things have all been extensively tested and they have never given anyone cancer or anything else.
*"Ivermectin was tested in a randomised study in Columbia at a dose of 300 μg per kilogram per day for 5 days, but there was no discernible benefit. In a second, related trial carried out at five separate US locations, even doses of 390 to 470 g per kilogram per day for 3 days did not have any discernible effects."* Just here to mock GM1221 .................
Also: *In this meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials involving 3901 patients, favorable mortality results were limited to trials in high-prevalence regions, with no evidence that ivermectin had a mortality benefit in low-prevalence regions. Meta-regression found an association between the regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis and risk of mortality, with a decrease in RR of 39% for each 5% increase in strongyloidiasis prevalence.* Ivermectin only showed positive benefits in regions where strongyloidiasis (intestinal parasites) were endemic, and not controlled for.
It’s so hard for me to understand how our society worked so hard and made so much progress in the field of medicine that saved millions of lives and now we are witnessing an exact reversal of those hard-earned achievements which is increasingly putting our society at a grave risk.
@@philo3479 Hey Philo3479. You wrote the Hep B approval trial "had 147 subjects safety tested for 5 days with no placebo control." Because when I looked Energix-B, had 6100 people in 58 clinical studies in 19 countries between 1984 - 1986, and was approved in 1989. It's still used. So I get the idea you made that up. *Can you explain what you wrote, perhaps name the study?*
@@philo3479 Dude. WTF are you talking about? *It was either a 3 or a 4 dose trial.* You appear to be randomly making stuff up. "Summary of clinical findings on Engerix-B, a genetically engineered yeast derived hepatitis B vaccine. Between February 1984 and August 1986 results have been obtained in 58 completed or ongoing clinical studies by 33 investigators in 19 countries on a yeast-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B). Among the 6100 subjects enrolled in these studies, 5664 subjects (150 normal neonates, 178 neonates of hepatitis B carrier mothers, 330 children aged 3-10 years, 3697 young healthy adults, 438 homosexual males, 110 older healthy adults, 139 drug addicts, 262 institutionalized mentally retarded patients, 59 thalassaemics, 25 sicklaemics, 270 patients on chronic haemodialysis and 6 haemophiliacs) received one or more (up to 4) injections of different doses of the yeast-derived vaccine according to either a 0, 1, 2, and 12 month or a 0, 1, and 6 month vaccination schedule." *Edit: And it seems to me you are misreporting the RECOMBIVAX HB trials. Even the package insert says.....* "In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to *147 healthy infants and children* (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for *5 days after each dose."* and "In a group of studies, 3258 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 10 mcg, *were administered to 1252 healthy adults* who were *monitored for 5 days after each dose."* There is this also this article from 1985 "MERCK's RECOMBIVAX HB DNA-DERIVED HEPATITIS VACCINE APPROVED JUNE 23 AFTER FIVE-MONTH REVIEW; MERCK WILL BEGIN MARKETING IN JANUARY" *That indicates it was trialed on 3000+ people before it was approved*
@@philo3479 Except of course you're *ignoring 50 years of safety studies.* Good grief, have a look on Scholar. I used "engerix b safety" and got 5,400 hits. *The first 7 pages were safety studies.* The most recent was May 2023. * You've claimed to be "in the field". How is it you don't know basics? Autism was added to DSM3 in 1980, and DSM4 massively expanded the definition in 1998. Surely you are aware of that, and other diagnostic expansion? * "Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease"
Yes I would love to transport some of these knuckle heads to, say, 900 CE and watch them seek relief from certain dreadful ailments like polio or one of the various plagues or rabies w/o the drugs and surgical protocols we have today. They could see first hand why life expectancy was so short. They could, as well, see that one of the reasons for life expectancy being so high in developed countries is easy access to pharmacological interventions. I think they would be ready to claw their way back to the 20th-21st century just for the over the counter remedies.
As much I enjoy Joe Rogan he has tendencies towards conspiracies and mysterious which is entertaining but can get dangerous when it goes to health related topics
Health related topics? That would be clean real food, no drugs, medicines, chemicals, GMO's, toxins...etc....etc.....That is HEALth!! Conspiracies are crimes and nothing more..... is there something wrong with looking to see if a crime has been committed? Mysteries...oh you bet there are..... plenty of 'em....the biggest mystery of all is how people can be so damn gullible (and stupid) to buy into taking something that does not work, because what it is suppose to work against does not in fact exist short of the theater and propaganda by their perceived overlords
Most of what he says is wrong I won’t say if it’s lies or incompetence because I don’t know for sure but it’s really dangerous because he’s the most listened to guy in the country and people will think he’s right because he’s rich that’s a huge problem with our country we think rich people are smart and moral people and we think poor or sick people are must have done something to deserve it
Multi-dose vials of any vaccine that may not be stored properly. It reduces both fungal and bacterial growth when multiple punctures of the latex seal occur.
June 2023: Huge leap in breast cancer survival rate Women diagnosed since 2010 have a much lower risk of dying than those diagnosed in the 1990s. The number of people who die after a breast cancer diagnosis has decreased by two-thirds since the 1990s, a study of more than half a million women in England has shown. The research has taken ten years to complete, says Carolyn Taylor, lead author of the study and an oncologist at the University of Oxford, UK. The analysis includes the 512,447 women in England who were diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer between January 1993 and December 2015; the researchers tracked the women until December 2020 using data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service.
Joe Rogan is asking questions. He's not a propagandaist or somebody pedaling disinformation for profit he has an inquisitive mind and he's asking questions and that's what science looks like. I'm sure he would happily have you on the podcast. The reason people like Joe Rogan so much is because he's willing to question things and he follows truth. And then he questions "the truth" and then he brings on guests that have questions about "the truth." That's what science looks like. We are currently living through an opioid crisis caused by the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA lying. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people dead because pharmaceutical companies and the FDA lied. I think it's perfectly fine to be skeptical of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. Don't you?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Why did Bayer infect thousand with HIV leading to thousands of AIDS deaths in France, Spain, Latin America and Asia by dumping a drug the FDA withdrew from the US market in those countries. Why did the US government conspire with Bayer to allow it to happen? And why was no one charged or held responsible for those sacrifices to Moloch? Finally: Whose responsibe for more deaths directly attributed to peddling false medical information..... FRK Jr or those Rotund Farmers you shill for.
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Sorry I forgot you don't like looking in the mirror of scientism. Question: Why should Joe Rogan have questioned anything RFK said. Because you think RFK is lying when he claimed no placebo trials have been conducted. Is that all you got for a three hour video you haven't watched, you took on faith what dr flunky debunky to you to believe.
I've never been an RFK Jr. fan. It should not only be easy for any Dr. to debate him with the facts like Dr. Wilson, but should be their duty (paging Dr. Hotez).
What makes it easy to play chess with a pigeon? It will just sh!t on the board, knock pieces over, and then have all its friends loudly proclaim it won.
@@KrapvagThat quote has been trending in youtube debunking crusaders channels comments since Hortez opened his big gob. I think the science community had a "debate" on an analogy to use in this regard: they came to a "concensus", the analogy is "settled".
This is the best piece of information I've seen to systematically break down RFK's arguments concisely and rationally. My wife and I were just exposed to RFK through town hall debate, which led to Rogan's interview and he came off as rational in those spaces (we knew nothing about him prior). But we had questions about how accurate his arguments are. He hits you with a bunch of information which you can't fact check on the spot so the arguments seem very rational and he seems to genuinely believe them. We searched around and found you, based on Sam Harris's recommendation. You broke things down calmly, rationally and concisely and we now feel informed accurately. Thank you for listing all the sources you cite. This is the quality media a healthy democracy needs to survive with educated citizens.
@kalimarus This is full of misinformation. Please see my comment above -- above when the comments are sorted with the newest first -- where I break it down.
Having personally known someone who went against the government and who won 3 6 digit settlements as a result i dont believe that adjuvants were always approved. In his military service he was able to win against the courts that the FDA unnaproved adjuvants used in military vaccines almost 20 years ago did in fact cause issues in service members. Squalene to be exact and i ask you if squalene isnt the problem why is it banned now and why was he able to win his court cases against the government because of it.
I love how RFK says these vaccines are not placebo tested but when it suits his narrative he cites studies comparing vaccine groups to the placebo groups.🤦🏽♂️
They are not tested against an actual, inactive placebo like saline. They are tested against another vaccine or sometimes against one of the vaccine adjuvants like the aluminum. When many parents questioned that, some researchers started terming the test substance a "comparator" because it is not an actual placebo. Read the package inserts! They are all archived online.
Thanks so much for your video. I watched the Joe Rogan episode and was punching my phone because of the ridiculous BS that was being said. Thanks for doing your part to provide clarity to the masses. Your videos should be required watxhing for ALL high-school students. Im serious...
Has anyone ever called him out real time on his claims of vaccine trials not being conducted? I’ve looked but couldn’t find it. The closest I could come is his definition of Placebo is different than the conventional definition.
There is constant miscommunication, as RFK jr. implies double blind placebo testing prior licensing on especially long term adversary health effects. And of course he is right on that with the Covid vaccin, because long term testing was not possible in order to come with a quick repsonse. In some interviews he was asked if it were his intention to prohibit the vaccine to the people, and he said that 'of course' he is not, he only doesn't want a mandate on vaccins that have not undergone the long term safety protocols that are standard for any other kind of medicine. He stated he is a liberal and everybody should make their own choice to take such a vaccin or not.
Therefore I among others think it's very important to have an in depth debate between him and a scientist who is very knowledgeable on the subject, to get to the detail of it. The censoring attempts only make this debate worse, or even suspicious...
It’s interesting because he’s open to debating anyone anytime and debates have been planned but people back out. In the Joe Rogan podcast RFK mentioned there was going to be several scientists debating him at the same time and they still backed out. Strange indeed
I loved your video. I learned more about variants of mercury and ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation. Id love to see you, him, and Rogan or Lex in a room to discuss these topics. +1 to your subscriber pool 😊
RFK Jr. needs to eat his own words and ‘stop this comic book description’ applied to his views on vaccines. He advocates understanding ‘the other side’ yet does none of it himself when it comes to anything scientific. He demonstrates his total lack of basic understanding of chemistry, let alone biochemistry and far beyond him to understand virology, immunology, vaccinology. And there remains no common language that each can understand each other,s ‘beef’
Sorry in avance for my bad english. I have a question regarding a study that Robert cited, the one where they found the mercury inside the monkies brain. I was hoping you would debunk that one, but you didn't mention it (or maybe I missed it?). Do you have any information about this? Thank you for your work.
@@matthewsands3591It absolutely is. One can merely look at the half life of both, because ethyl decays faster. It takes 10 days for half a given amount of ethyl mercury to decay, wheras it takes 50 days for the same amount of methylmercury to decay. That's 5x as fast. And that's assuming it all accumulates.
@@Skidwell19 that's not true. It's already been established that Ethyl Mercury leaves the blood faster because it goes into the brain, not because it is excreted from the body.
@@matthewsands3591 I actually found this video very interesting and helpful. To be honest I rather be informed by a true scientist than a guy who says that the free market will solve the climate crisis.
@@delfordchaffin5617 copium ? hopium ? not hard to desperately reach for excuses whilst flatly refusing to face the elephant in the room. way to go kiddo ! 😂🤦🏽♂️🥴
In fairness, he did say that all he asked for was one study that showed they are safe and effective which showed a control group and cross analysis. One could not be obtained. He also stated that the rate of autism in the populous has skyrocketed since the 1960s-70s and that no one can understand why that happened.
"...and that no one can understand why that happened." Which shows he isn't looking at the scientific literature. And of course, he has repeatedly blamed the vaccines. First it was the thimerosal, then it was MMR, now it's the many vaccines, and he'll happily rinse and repeat these three arguments. That thimerosal is largely removed from just about all vaccines, and thus cannot explain the increase in autism at all, he doesn't care. That the MMR vaccine has repeatedly been shown not to be associated with autism, he doesn't care (he'll just cite some bad paper here and there to suggest it may, or refer to the child abuser Andrew Wakefield). That no new vaccines have been added to the schedule for decades (until recently), and thus also cannot explain a rise in autism, he does not care. He'll keep on pointing at the vaccines.
Autism only became a diagnosis in 1980, when it was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM3). In 1998 it became Austism Spectrum Disorder, in DSM4. Note that it's always been recognised it runs in families e.g. it has a genetic base The rate is the same as it always was. Diagnoses have skyrocketed. RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods.
@@May_Day45 LOL @ "RFK is telling the truth." He wouldn't know the truth if it bit him. I wrote .... "The rate is the same as it always was. _Diagnoses have skyrocketed._ RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods." I notice you didn't address that. I'll also note that ASD is a description of behavioural characteristics. Go read them. Half the people in these comments, you included, are probably on the spectrum. I trust you now feel like someone with a severe problem, who deserves to be stigmatised by RFK
@@May_Day45 Yes, he's telling the truth! The V industry naturally pushes the notion that it is all genetic. But genetics require a TRIGGER. I think RFK allows that vaccines probably are not the ONLY contributor. Rather, maybe other environmental toxins build up & set the stage, & then 4-5 vaccines at once may push a child over the edge. Untold thousands of parents have SEEN it happen!
"Exposure to mercury can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with autism, and the similarities extend to neuroanatomy, neurotransmitters, and biochemistry."
The sad part is that not enough people will see this video.....the sadder part is that some who do will dismiss it because it doesn't fit their narrative.
@@aaronhall5715 Well I think they are attempting to say the vast majority of the worlds medical professionals, governments, academics, public servants et al, have all been indoctrinated with false information, by a vast nefarious something. And only they, the chosen few, know the truth.
There's a reason why RFK Jr. is a career politician and not a career scientist. But he sure likes to talk like he's one. I give him a couple more months of "fame" until he goes way off the rails.
09:12 They did not tested whether aluminium accumulated in the body, they only tested blood and hair…if aluminium accumulated in the central nervous system, would have they been able to find out ? 10:05 RFK is talking about DTP, not DTaP. He is not lying. 15:17 well if they got sued and lost money…weren’t they in the wrong ? Shouldn’t they be winning their lawsuits if their vaccines were effectively safe ? Isn’t it how justice work ? 18:34 How do you catch hepatitis B ? No one argued about the severity of it, just the way it’s transmitted. 20:00 Have you wondered why the studies always focus on ONE vaccine, as if they were taken in a vacuum ? You are expected to take more than 50 in your life, where are the studies that compare longitudinally vaccinated and unvaccinated people for overall health ? (Those studies exist by the way like Hooker & Miller)
These are all good points. I don’t think everything said in this “debunking” video is just not convincing. It’s interesting that they ended up removing Thimerosal from most vaccine anyways. The statements don’t really add up to me… we determined it’s safe, but want to remove it as a precautionary measure. doesn’t really check out to me.
I'm interested in hearing where you got claims 1 and 2 from, especially the second. Bobby doesnt cite sources very often, other than the Johns Hopkins uni graphs, so where can I read about the DTP vaccine? And are you sure they arent talking about the same vaccine? Seems to me like the one that dr Wilson was talking about was the exact same (the "a" seems to be short for "and". "Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis" vaccine versus "Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis" vaccine). It bothers me a lot that you didn't acknowledge the other stuff the guy in the vid pointed out. I'll to say the same for the things he himself didnt talk about, that were featured in the original podcast. None of this is gonna stop me from voting RFK (all the way), since he is very libertarian and only wants to research this all further. However, I think peddling conspiracy theories like these (to the extent that they are conspiracy theories) is very harmful to the trust people need to have when it comes to medicinal advice and other science.
And for the last thing you said, he did in fact mention what you are looking for at 19:54. The very first link he shared under "vaccines don't cause autism" is about an experiment that did test with multiple vaccines. They used 4 sets of vaccines, showing no correllation. Most of the relevant text is on page 3, but you might as well read it all, its only a few pages. copy and paste in your browser or click the link in the description ua-cam.com/users/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbjc3a1pzNUF1cEtxanNoSmRNMWJ2bEliVkhfd3xBQ3Jtc0tuakRacGZvWVJsVl84TlZJWE40bkNQRmxTck1Hb1dUVTk0VEtMWFFEZWFQcWFUZ3lMOUh6MHItZnVBXzVkajdBY2llWU9lVUl2OFRROGY5bElSTEJXU0Z3aWxqQUlteWQwU2JwUUJIWVVuLWZNZzhUbw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fautismsciencefoundation.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fvaccine.2019.pdf&v=sugCJNAPF9o
47:55, JRE wasn't dangling money payable to Dr. HOTEZ, but to a charity of his choice. I think a charity unless fraudulent, is bound to do more good than harm, and debating an "anti-vaxxer" especially when that person is running for presidential elections is indeed the more responsible thing to do. So, to decline such an offer doesn't seem like the best course of action.
I will push back on a couple of things. The media were absolutely disingenuous saying Joe took "horse dewormer" when ivermectin is a common drug given to humans. And Joe wasnt saying Vit D will cure covid, he said Vit D deficiency is a big issue and could lead to a weaker immune system and thus more susceptible to severe covid symptoms.
@@dkoliregardless of how they refer to it, the fact he still took ivermectin goes a LONG way to discredit him as someone worth taking seriously on basically anything other than getting TBIs from sport fighting - something he clearly seems to have experience with.
I listen to multiple other science videos. Why didn’t UA-cam’s algorithms recommend Debunk the Funk? Not once, when I get recommended a lot of other things that make no nonsense.
This channel doesn't seem very algorithm friendly, despite the content being very informative and very good. The videos are pretty informal, very long, and don't have a very high production budget for a team to edit or design the thumbnails and videos (at least, that's what it seems like to me, especially since he makes these videos in his free time). I think his presentation is the biggest reason why the algorithm doesn't spread his videos. His subscriber base is still pretty small too. It's a real shame. Hope to see the channel grow and develop a lot more since science misinformation only seems to become more and more relevant.
By low information people you are referring to me. I had a vaccine injury twenty years ago and i've read everything I can to try to understand it. Most of the scientific literature is paid for by the companies making the drugs. I don't know how you trust the same companies that told us opioids were not addictive. They had studies proving that opiods were not addictive.
Are you able to cite any of the studies claiming that opioids are not addictive (reminds me of how the benefits of anti-depressants have been grossly over stated)?
exactly, you don't see RFK trying to debunk thus guy, he'd be happy to debate him face to face, this guy is a condescending fraud, he pleads to people's need to be right.
That's both true and false. I can confirm I have seen multiple periodic tables. Old ones, that didn't have all the current elements. And multiple hard copies, which can only be described as periodic tables Just winding you up. I actually thought your comment was observant and funny
@@Muritaipet @Muritaipet "How shall I mock the: Common Cold Unit..... Errrrr....no. Human Challenge Trials...... May or may not happen yet. But hey the future predicts the present right Einstein: E=Mc2? Dr Flunky💉Junkie got schooled and you're still following the fool you tool. On the transmission of respiratory viruses. When asked: Therefore they can infect the people standing around them? Dan the flunk💉junkie replied: "That doesn't checkout really" @Muritaipet "dr flunky: how shall i mock thee: I dont engage with virus deniers" Oh and by the way: now you're canceling your subscription, you not wanting to be associated with a virus denying charlatan..... See yeh🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@MessiahNonEst How shall I mock thee, let me count the ways ................ OMG, I just clicked! You guys both have the cultist / great leader mentality!!! So you have some video that "destroys Wilson" I'm guessing? And this will... do something? *And you think I care about Wilson. Oh that's absolutely priceless!!!* @messiahnonest 1 day ago Definitely the latter. The guy got schooled on being a fool,he knows so much that is not true. ua-cam.com/video/dDe4zMqtE2E/v-deo.html @Goodmorning1221- 20 hours ago @messiahnonest That link is gold. We have to keep posting it. No need to argue anymore with the trolls
@@DrSurirose a fundamental error that can make some of his listeners lose trust! He seems like a genuine guy. I wonder if he knows that all his scientific arguments are fake news. He probably does. At the end of the day, he is a politician.
I apreciate your effort to shed some light into this topic rather than just disregard it as undeserving of any time. A bunch of JFK's claims seem outright absurd and outragous to most regular people. But if as much as one thing he says holds water, that's already one too many. I'm specially interested on his claims of systemic capture and perverse insentives on the regulatory bodies and the industry at large. Those can't be explained away with data from these very sources. It's like debunking accusations that a government is corrupt by using data from the same corrupt government. People would not be at the current level of scrutiny and distrust of the medical industry had they not commited blunders before. The absolutely mainstream and uncontested position on the current opiod crisis in america is that it was caused by a mixture of negligence and naivity by practitioners and propaganda and biased research by the pharma industry. We can't pretend things like that never happened, and we can't naively trust every scientific paper when academia itself recognizes that almost half of peer reviewed published research (including medical) ends up proving unreproduceable (unreproducibility crisis) and most of medical research is indeed funded by multi-national pharma companies. I think the journalist Briahna Joy Gray and Dr. Vinay Prasad (both pro vaccine and very skeptical of RFK Jr) did a much better analysis of his claims in Brie's podcast "bad faith". They were more focused, and despite Bria not really siding with Kennedy, she did an excelent job at steel-maning him and coming into it already knowing what were the "buts" and "what ifs" that RFK or some like-minded person would have to the most obvious and imediate rebutals. She really was making an effort to find where the failure points are indeed. Your video, in comparison, just seemed too surface level and comformist to dissuade people who are already distrustful of the scientific aparatus.
"Most regular people" isn't a good measure of intelligence. Most people are pretty stupid. Most of what RFK says seems on point and correct to me. Saying that something "sounds" absurd without counting whether there are facts or evidence supporting it seems a little ignorant to me.
@@SG-zp5uy I'm not uzing "most regular people" as a mesuring stick for the correctness of an opinion. Just as an assesment of public opinion. RFK wants to run for president afterall. Public opinion is very important for those goals.
@@buzinaocara It's important to note then if you're going to say that's what people think. I also don't really agree that most people think that way about what he says. Mainstream media which is corrupt likes to paint him in a certain light and people follow suit for that reason, but not the ones who are actually paying attention. He's also right about vaccines and I don't like how you're trying to stay in the middle ground and say that both sides are right when he's clearly right and the entire vaccine industry is corrupt.
Didn't realize that JFK was still around to make any claims at all! Seriously though, the podcast with Briahna Joy Gray and Dr. Prasad was definitely not more "focused". They spent more time talking about broad, vague points regarding how Big Pharma is too powerful and not enough time on the specific claims of RFK Jr. Dr. Wilson cuts out the noise and just gets right to the point of why RFK Jr.'s claims are BS and probably lies. He deals with the claims directly and succinctly, and does not bloviate needlessly like the Gray and Prasad discussion so obviously did. Big Pharma definitely needs to be reined in, probably nationalized. Glad we agree there! But their mistakes are not the only reason citizens have a poor understanding of medicine. It is also that there is a cottage industry of con artists like RFK Jr. that exist to spread nonsense for profit.
@@SG-zp5uy "He's also right about vaccines " What is he specifically right about with regards to vaccines? Which vaccine? Pick a specific vaccine and negative outcome.
---- Description (sources used) continued ---
Cell phones don’t cause brain tumors or damage the blood brain barrier: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.20702
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017310000718?via%3Dihub
Why you should get vaccinated even if previously infected: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04865-0
www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00159-7
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175
More on germinal centers: www.nature.com/articles/s41577-021-00657-1
Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID:
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362
Vitamin D doesn’t work for COVID:
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0267918
www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071230
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779952
How influenza causes secondary bacterial pneumonia: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642581/
AZT is an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC386922/pdf/pnas00325-0322.pdf
Anti-retroviral cocktails save lives: ourworldindata.org/art-lives-saved
Christine Maggiore’s story: www.latimes.com/local/la-me-christine-maggiore30-2008dec30-story.html
Some pharmacovigilance of COVID vaccines: www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext
drive.google.com/file/d/1_wHIYX-tGkGBPwuax7N8BxZPR4PTTCDm/view
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475
The 1976 flu vaccine story: www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The FDA is not “funded” by big pharma (CORRECTION: second source here should have been included in the video): www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=6bc1186549ec
www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2786
Basics of Autism: www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928
www.spectrumnews.org/news/new-studies-reveal-how-autism-might-alter-synapse-formation-pruning/
Song used for outro: Fan-made piece
Blah blah blah. Go debate
OK Dr. Willson just a little question about "drinking chlorine... " I understood the larger point you were trying to make and of course I agree ... but ... just how do you drink a gas 😅? pretty sure you would die from the effects of inhaling it first.
Also, your stomach isn't going to break down chlorine gas into hydrochloric acid, your stomach produces hydrochloric acid and a thick layer of mucus which is why your stomach doesn't digest itself. However if you swallow large quantities of hydrochloric acid you're going to have problems. But many of our medications are compounded with small amounts of hydrochloric acid.
@@paulacoyle5685 There are multiple states of matter and also solutions and mixtures. Such as chlorine tablets used for pools.
@@paulacoyle5685 go try it then
@@bobroberts8500 Joe rogan viewer right here jajaja.
It's real easy to sling mud. it's much more difficult to clean up the mess.
Dr Hortez approves this comment.
@@MessiahNonEstIt's "Hotez", and you're clearly embarrassed that he has credentials and education (and human decency) you can only dream of.
Both sides can say the exact same thing you said. That’s why it’s extremely important to research both sides with extreme thoroughness, and not listen to one side alone, or with bias. Bc it is very difficult to clean up messes.
@@diandian9827 nah it’s dOc Whore-tez .... he who wears a comedy white coat & has a magnifying glass on his desk, so you can deffo 100% trust him ! 😂
@@MessiahNonEstrent free
If I had ever contracted hepatitis B, I would not have been able to be treated with the drug that has been suppressing my multiple sclerosis progression for the last six years. I actually, without realizing it, missed some of the doses - I missed half the school year in seventh grade - and didn’t realize I wasn’t protected, but fortunately, herd immunity seems to have kept me safe.
Now, I am immunosuppressed, but despite the risk to me, my ex - who is a huge RFK Jr. and Joe Rogan fan - had a veritable hissy fit when I asked him to get a full STI screening before we had sex. Despite the fact that he is a former IV drug user.
This was shocking and frankly inexplicable to me, at the time, but I guess it makes a little more sense now - ex was mainlining this bullsh*t.
Anyway, happy ending, the relationship terminated unconsummated.
In this world of misinformation, we need people like you. Thank you!!
This was a really good explanation and breakdown on RFK’s claims. I’m now leaning more against his claims on vaccines. However, something that I would’ve liked to see differently is when considering if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a resounding YES.
You talk about how usually the questions he asks (we all ask) have already been asked and answered by a scientist somewhere, and debated in an office, classroom, water cooler, etc. Well the average person doesn’t have access to those conversations and that’s what we want to hear. We don’t want to continue with the “trust the experts” narrative. Sure, they might be right most of the time, but we want to understand it as well. We want to have access to those conversations, that’s how we get less distrustful. And what better way to do so than to have a debate with someone who has strong opposing views on the matter.
When asked if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a YES, absolutely. There should be nothing to lose if we’re doing it in the name of curiosity, science and knowledge.
That is exactly the problem. RFK debating a scientist is exactly what he wants, especially a live debate. To the viewer, it makes it appear that RFK is on a similar level to a scientist before the debate had even started. When it does begin, RFK merely needs to go outside of the scope of the scientists field of expertise, or the scope of debate. Once he does, it is very easy for him to make whatever claim he likes without fear of contradiction. This is exactly what happened with Monkton when he debated a climate scientist live. Another outcome occured with Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, where Ham used a whole array of debating tactics, fallacies, and forged evidence. As soon as anyone bothered to check the claims of Ham, they quickly found that he had made most of it up.
A proper scientific debate is a lot more rigid though. It is slower for starters. Claims always need to be backed up with sources, and every source has the time to be checked. The whole point is to expose errors and find out what is right and wrong. This is the exact opposite of what RFK wants.
@@philo3479You have no idea what deflection is, do you? It's the same topic. Funnily enough, this is also a debating tactic used during live debates.
A face to face debate is not necessary to review and debate evidence. This is regularly done in the scientific literature. RFK could also respond in video format to any of the videos made debunking him, which would therefore start a debate. So why doesn't he go ahead and do it?
I suppose you can’t smell Globalist lies then
Rubbish!Dr Martyn Phipps
Wrong. It’s impossible to ‘debate’ somebody who just makes shit up, as RFKJr continuously does. The scientist will be bound by things like truth, evidence, and reality; while this Q-uack’s objective is to obfuscate those. A perfect example is when he lies about his private conversations with others, as he did with Rogan concerning Dr. Offit. If you were Joe and - unlike Joe - wanted your podcast to be factually-accurate, how could you possibly fact-check RFKJr in realtime about that conversation? You absolutely couldn’t, so it would come across as him scoring a point that you couldn’t refute. Bottom line is that you simply cannot debate fundamentally dishonest people, especially when their audiences don’t care whether the claims are accurate or not.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." -Upton Sinclair
We've got a cast of characters here. Are you referring to someone in particular?
Yup. RFKjr is a glorified ambulance chaser.
@@kawasakiwhiptwo5821 I think immediatly of John Campbell.
@@emmajones8590 What are your feelings when you think of him?
Ohhhh…..
Lmao!
I seriously thought you were talking about this guy and the entire pharmaceutical companies!
😂
A science communicator, not a scientist only, should debate RFK
21:18 I was at school in the early 1960’s and neither autism or ADHD were recognised. Anyone showing signs of these conditions was considered a disruptive influence or a daydreamer or worse.
Yes, exactly this!
Where are all the 60yr olds with autism today? They should still be around at the same rate we're seeing autism in children
@@Unvaccinated69 what do you mean by autism? I worked with adults with learning disabilities including autism. We are not talking about high functioning autism such as Asperger’s, those affected people are effectively behind an impenetrable barrier. A colleague of mine was high functioning and was working as a paramedic. Autism is a spectrum of signs and symptoms. Older people could be on the spectrum but have managed throughout their lives so why would they need a specific diagnosis?
@@Unvaccinated69 Sadly, autistic people, have an average life expectancy ranging from 39.5 years to 58 years. That's why.
@@Unvaccinated69That is an unenlightened view, one of many things you don't understand is social media didn't exist, so you simply didn't hear about it, and the stigma around having a child like that kept them hidden, that is until schools were created for them, huge signs saying, Spastic Centre, and they were transported in vehicles with, Spastic Bus in big letters up the side, many were abandoned into orphanages, I spent a large part of the 70's with my Father taking abandoned children out once a month, that is where I first experienced the damage caused by Thalidomide.
Thank you for these videos man. So valuable to the discourse. This channel is a treasure.
Joe Rogan should understand the "2 Mercuries" concept very well. He wont shut up about THC & DMT being different depending on how you use it.
Go eat either mercury.
Both will kill you - This is embarrassing
like people trying to sell you a bridge.
the experimental drug is bad. no ifs ands or buts
Why does Apple not recommend holding your phone up to your head?
From your iPhone legal document
To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.
Because of an abundance of caution. Every building, car, and business in California has a cancer warning on it. If you hold an dosimeter (reads for radioactivity) it won't read anything from an iphone. Not all radiation is radioactive. There are going to be random correlations that look like there are patterns but are just as I said random. This can be explained as "dartboard statistics" where you throw a whole bunch of darts on a barn and then draw the target after. Otherwise we have to believe that everything everywhere causes cancer.
This is essentially legalese to protect themselves from liability in case RFK types try to sue them with spurious correlations in cell phone usage and cancer rates.
Apple has probably not tested the RF frequency exposures with every single type of cell phone case out there, many made by third parties, so this is just a blanket warming against possible liability.
Though as a physicist, I cannot for the life of me imagine how even a metal case could change the RF enough to even get close to approaching dangerous levels.
Remember anything up to 300 GHz is withing safe guidelines, which is miles away from even 5 GHz, which is the highest frequencies that most cell phones use
@@ValleyDragonit even mentions some cases made of metal. I imagine they wrote this to protect them from shoddy third party companies who produce phone cases with unforseen side effects that people might blame on apple themselves.
Not that a simple metal case could possibly turn harmless radio waves into dangerous ionizing radiation, but this is a legal document, not a peer reviewed study.
If you have a a metal plate in your head
@@wallacegrommet9343 Incorrect, thats not what the guidelines say.
why is no one going after Kennedy for his responsibility in the measles outbreak in Somoa a few years back? Kids directly died after Kennedy's visit there a few months earlier???
I'd written this for another comment, saw yours, so I've just re-posted here
From about 2010, there was a sustained anti Vx campaign in Samoa, led mainly by traditional faith healers. Immunisation rates dropped. In 2018 2 infants were given a shot, using muscle relaxant instead of saline, with the obvious tragic consequences. The nurses responsible did prison time, Vx rates plummeted.
In 2019 they had a measles outbreak. In 6000 cases, 83 people died, 80 of them under 4 years old. You can see in those numbers it wasn't just newborns, who were not protected in 2018/2019. It took out a wide range of children, and some adults.
RFK turned up in Samoa about 6 months before the outbreak, many people blame him. But you can see he was just using the 2018 event, as an opportunistic way to get publicity. He's of course is fully protected, as are his family. It's likely he uses the A-V thing, mainly for money and fame.
But he doesn't trumpet his involvement in Samoa, or even mention it. For the obvious reason
Incidentally, Samoa had a 99% immunisation rate for CV
@@Muritaipet I know he doesn't mention it which indicates his guilt in doing as such. What I don't get is why no one else does either. It's not going to be easy for him to respond to although I am sure he's anitivaxxer supporters won't care...
@@robertchflynn I really thought Samoa would be the end of the A-V nonsense. It's so fundamentally clear what happened. I was then absolutely horrified by the nonsense they came out with afterwards, to justify why their precious fantasy was being proven wrong. That's when I started challenging them.
RFK wrote to the Samoan Prime Minister during the outbreak, and mass vaccination campaign that stopped it. He said the outbreak was actually being caused by the vaccines.
I fundamentally agree with you BTW. I'd like to see RFK do time.
@@Muritaipet Time he visited Dallas.
@@christopherrobinson7541 No comment
Again, thank you for being so generous with your time and so patient listening to people who don’t know what they’re talking about so you can help others sort through the pile of garbage. From what I can gather, listening with my screen reader, this video came out before The news about Robert F Kennedy having had a worm eat part of his brain, and before he told his story about picking up a young bear that was roadkill. There is something wrong with his thinking. Thank you for presenting some history of previous anti-vaccination movements as well. During the aids epidemic in the late 80s, early 90s, I remember arguing with someone in one of the AOL chat rooms. he came back with“So, your scientist can beat up my scientist?“ That is still happening here. I thank God for you. Maybe one day if enough people call out the liars and hypocrites, they will be seen for what they are. Grifters and charlatans.
The idea of a “live debate” is really stupid. RFK will just pull out some new “study” that no one has heard of, and the scientist will have no time to read it and critique it. So if they insist on a debate, it should be done more like a legal trial. You must submit your evidence ahead of time for the other side to read. And then stick to that.
Exactly. He will also accuse people of being in the pocket of Big Pharma, and denial of that being the cause, no matter how truthful, is just going to be used as another opportunity to attack the scientist. Just see how RFK Jr just throws around that Offit made hundreds of millions from the rotavirus vaccine - with reckless disregard for the truth - and will never ever correct that false claim. There's no need for him to do so, his acolytes will not care, those on the fence won't know, and those who DO know it is false see him as a disinformer already anyway.
@neverforget1971 With serial liars like you, yes, a debate is bad. It gives you legitimacy that you do not deserve.
@neverforget1971 he's not crying. Dishonest bad faith actors being able to take advantage of certain debates formats is just a reality. Sorry little trolly bud
4:40 With regards to methyl mercury compared with ethyl mercury. The same difference is true between methyl alcohol (methanol) and ethyl alcohol (ethanol) drinking methanol even in small quantities regularly results in blindness and other conditions, whereas ethanol in reasonable quantities doesn’t.
Apples to oranges.
@@user-tf4ho2uo1e actually it’s a comparison between the two organic parts of the molecule methyl and ethyl.
I developed vaccine induced uveitis after a flu shot 20 years ago.
Could it have been mercury that caused my partial blindness?
@@MRCAGR1 That's why I find RFK Jr's mistake forgivable. The mercury actually *is* the same, just like he said. It's the chemical bound to the mercury that's different. Nobody actually calls sodium chloride and hydrogen chloride two different kinds of *chlorine.* Whoever tried to explain the issue to RFK Jr. did a lousy job of it.
@@MichaelJPartyka it's forgivable if someone corrects him on the point and he accepts the correction. If he continues to make the claim after being told why it's incorrect, then we have to ask whether it's wilful ignorance, or deliberate dishonesty.
You need to be on JRE for sure! Thank you for standing up.
JRE?...LOL
JR would eat him alive .. wouldn't stand a chance..
@@andrewfinlay5160 100% agree, RFK and JR would shred this guy. dr.wilson is a pharma shill, its insane how dishonest this guy is.
@@andrewfinlay5160Rhetorical effectiveness isn’t the same as scientific knowledge or being correct. Maybe it wouldn’t go well for him, still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
Below are just some of the studies that show negative biological effects of Radiofrequency or Wifi radiation.
While Non-ionizing radiation does not carry enough energy to remove an electron from an atom or molecule that does not mean that it can't have biological effects. Near infrared light has been shown to have positive biological effects while Wifi and Radiofrequency have been shown to have neagtive biological effects.
For exampole: Wifi and RF waves have been shown to increase the amount of Reactive Oxygen Species in sperm cells which can damage the DNA as mentioned in one of the studies below. So saying that Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause DNA damage is not true. The damage is not caused by heating from these waves because the energy produced from phones is insignificant. It is well described the possible methodology of how these Electromagnetic waves could affect our mitochondria.
You also said that the radiations needs to be strong enough to penetrate through your skin. This is now how this works. Low frequency waves tend to penetrate materials more effectively than high frequency waves. For example, radio waves (which are low frequency) can penetrate walls and buildings, while higher frequency waves like X-rays are more likely to be absorbed or scattered by the materials they encounter.
I advocate more quality studies to be done in this area (studies that do not have conflict of interest!) and to take precautionary measures against Wifi and RF waves. It is important to note that being very close to the source of radiation is unadvised.
Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication (link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1019150510840)
Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211026781)
Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000133)
Exercise ameliorates hippocampal damage induced by Wi-Fi radiation; a biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical study (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061823000224)
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function (rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml)
Man am I ever glad no one ever wants or wanted to appoint him head of any government agency, that person would have to be insane to even suggest they would do that to the country
At 6:07 you note that "pretty much all the mercury is excreted" and from that you draw the conclusion that ethylmercury is safe. This is an incorrect way of reasoning, because it may be the non-excreted mercury that does the damage.
From the 2002 "Three Faces of Mercury" paper by the University of Rochester in New York by the Department of Environmental Medicine:
"Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury more rapidly than methyl mercury, but the latter produces more brain damage."
I direct you to the 3 papers cited in the 2 minutes before this time stamp you have here (three separate trials looking at neurological outcomes in fairly large population trials), rather than this descriptive paper you cite that has a few case reports of ethyl mercury exposures in much higher doses with a completely different method of ingestion (a serious of ivig infusions and plasma infusions). Those three papers aren’t just higher order types of data (larger sample size, an actual testable hypothesis, etc), they are also published after this 2002 paper you cite
@@ziachoudhury4769 Thank you for the papers. I have no challenge to their shared conclusion (i.e. that cognitive impairment is not associated with low-level thimerosal exposure in children). However, this conclusion is not the same thing as saying that ethylmercury is safe (the 2nd paper says as much in its conclusion).
There are large studies that draw the same conclusion for methylmercury exposure in children (e.g. Llop 2016, Myers 1998 & 2020, Patel 2019, Stratakis 2020, Vejrup 2022). However, I think you would probably agree with me that such studies do not provide a basis to say that methylmercury is safe.
As one of the papers that Wilson cites says: "no controlled studies of low-dose ethylmercury toxicity in humans have been conducted" (Hviid 2003 via Tamma 2009). This is because ethylmercury has traditionally been considered to have a similar safety profile to methylmercury (they differ by only one carbon atom), and so such controlled studies are not performed because they are considered reckless and dangerous.
Wilson's claim that ethylmercury leaves the body much quicker than methylmercury is true, but such blood-based analyses don't tell the whole mercury-bioaccumulation picture. Critically, when we look at primate models of ethylmercury vs methylmercury vaccines (Burbacher 2005), the words of the researchers note that: "there was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)" and that data from the "study support the prediction that, although little accumulation of Hg in the blood occurs over time with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur. Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid, given the significantly slower half-life of Hg in the brain as observed in the infant macaques."
@@lenschulwitz1934 According to the study you're citing "A much lower brain concentration of total Hg was observed in the thimerosal monkeys compared with the MeHg monkeys, that is, a 3- to 4-fold difference for an equivalent exposure of Hg. Moreover, total Hg is cleared much more rapidly from the brain after thimerosal than after MeHg exposure (24 vs. 60 days)."
The conclusions are that safety drawn from blood clearance does not show the full picture is correct, since it does clear more slowly in the brain than in the blood (but it still clears more quickly than MeHg). Though the composition of the thimerosal ethyl Hg is different than the MeHg (dealkalination, etc. making potentially less toxic). We need more data is what the study was saying. All subsequent data show no link between autism and thimerosal, per the studies provided in description of vid, so this does not really matter. Especially since, as stated, they've removed thimerosal from "required" vaccinations.
@@pierremilot8117 a lower concentration of total Hg from thimerosal in the brain, but a "higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)". Inorganic mercury is widely suspected of causing neurological defects.
The paper also notes that the desire to study the link to autism has been "abandoned" which the authors find "difficult to understand, given our current limited knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental neurotoxicity of thimerosal".
I want to see a scientist like you debate RFK Jr. on JRE podcast.
@@donsantiagoramoncajal1199 right or wrong RFK is able to question the narrative. There is to much evidence that the scales of justice were heavily weighted towards mRNA and big pharma profits.
We simply want to follow the money.
@@donsantiagoramoncajal1199 So that millions of people, including sceptics can see/hear the arguments for themselves. It would be more productive. It's like left vs right. People talk about each other but not to each other. And a lot of money would go to the charity that the scientist picks.
No you don't. In that type of bad faith "debate," the liar can still come out looking Iike the "winner," based on the rhetoric tricks they use, the environment of the debate, etc. It's likely a no-win situation for the scientist involved, even if he has all the facts behind him.
@@DNorbs7 it's ok. You can not argue with facts. And if the science can show one person one bit of knowledge that changes their opinion then the exercise is worth the effort.
I'm sure a person armed with facts will not get hoodwinked by rhetoric.
@@jackthepickledhound RFK is lying through his teeth, he's not questioning any narrative. He's absolutely bat shit crazy and has been debunked many times over the decades by many people. Even Scientific American has written articles about him, about how badly he has damaged scientific discourse. Any debate with him would be just a constant stream of "you're wrong" and "it doesn't work that way" from the scientists. It would be like a constitutional judge debating Trump on whether the election was stolen. You don't debate crazies, they're not worth it.
This is a great video and hopefully serves as a good example to not only the scientific community, but all of academia. We are living in a time where science is being faced with greater scrutiny than it has in past decades. It is a much better use of your time breaking down the nuance of misinformation, rather than making outright attempts to silence it. This channel will hopefully grow an act as a voice against public confusion.
@@philo3479 Does that make RFK Jr the AntiChrist?
@@christopherrobinson7541 No, Greta Thunberg acts like one, and looks like one.
Get boosted in the fall when they tell you to order follower
His refutation of RFK's claims, are not true. None of the children's vaccines found in the schedule have been tested against true placebos in stage 3. None of them. They have all been tested against other vaccines or substances which can be harmful. Have you bothered to check it out or do you just believe what they tell you?
@cornballmcgoo7174 OK, will do, definitely preferable over getting Covid.
At least 5 👍 for this video. I can only imagine how irritating it was to watch R.F.K Jr interview and know how much damage it's doing.
Anyone else looking for that good morning guy or the one who spams that comment about lobsters in here? I was reading the comments on another video on this channel and those guys each have over ONE THOUSAND comments on his videos alone. Terrifying how obsessed those dudes are
Good god, that moron from hell was posting his cut-and-paste boldfaced/italicized nonsense within minutes of this video going up yesterday, and I wore my typing fingers out challenging him!
The lobster guy is Rab J. He's purely one of those " mythical Norwegian creatures " (YT hates the word, but if it's not obvious, search the term.) Generally, if you ignore them, they just go away.
GM1221 appears to be a genuine denier of a number of proven medical things. I really enjoy mocking him, but it's not worth engaging with him. It's impossible to win an argument with someones imagination.
@@diandian9827It was well worth wearing out your typing fingers - you did a great job! ⭐
Thank you for this, I like JRE but I like the truth the most. We need you on JRE 😂
He lets people talk put their 2 cents in. This whole I don’t agree with so you so not be allowed to talk crap has got to stop. The problem is everyone wants to control what other people are doing and saying. If you don’t like the info change the channel. What RFK is saying is once you understand how the whole medical data system works you understand it will always side with whoever is funding it. Because they need that conclusion to generate more money for more funding. So you don’t necessarily get 100% accurate data. The data is skewed to support whoever’s funding it. Let’s say I’m a company I hire a scientist to research something for me and his findings will literally put me out of business. I’m not going to make that data public I’m gonna go hire another scientist to figure out how not to come to that conclusion. I will promise him more funding for a project that he wants in the future and the cycle continues. What the vaccine has done is made doctors that are coming up on retirement question everything that they’ve been reading for years. We’re at that level that every system is so corrupt you can’t trust anything. When do you have a system where politicians can be bought nothing is organic or legitimate it’s always gonna be skewed for profit.
This guy is too scared to debate anyone. Just sits an interpreter the way he wants. I'll debate him.
@@woodyjud7149So, lets hear it!
Peopel just need to stop watching JRE. IT's terribad.
@@beansnrice321 why is it terrible. Have you watched it
Thank you for this video! ❤
And just like that your false sense of security is achieved 😇
❤
There are numerous conflicting studies and a deeper discussion about toxicology to be had. As I’ve said before. It is almost impossible to locate ONE cause of mounting problems because there are so many environmental toxins.
He sounds like he has a frog in the throat. Is he OK? I learned that he has spasmodic dysphonia.
While kennedy was advocating for people harmed by large corporations he identifind his condition as a side affect of a vaccine ingredient.
I know you will say that there is no way to prove this. But when you live with a vaccine injury especially one that affects the way you talk or the way you see, you appreciate people who try to get to truth versus just debunking those of us struggling to find answers.
Thanks for all your terrific work. That was a breath of fresh air.
Vincent Racianello is going to record a video debunking this interview as well.
oh yeah
Vincent is too worried about retaining his NIH funding to ever be honest or objective about anything...especially in regards to Covid origins. Plus Vincent really just wants to continue to do his GOF/GOFROC research in NYC at Columbia University without any oversight or regulations.
Regardless, especially in the context of the past few years with mRNA vaccines, the "anti-vaxxer" label really just indicates that the person using it as a pejorative is either a simpleton or a shill. Why? There are a wide range of vaccine types for a wide array of virus types with a wide array of immune responses, durability, and safety profiles. So you have to evaluate each and every vaccine on its own merits.
In general, vaccines for slow mutating non-zoonotic viruses with long incubation times tend to be more effective and durable than vaccines for fast mutating zoonotic respiratory viruses with short incubation times like Sars-Cov-2. The more epitopes of multiple proteins from a virus that vaccines use, the broader the immune response with less likelihood of antigen escape. So an inactivated or attenuated vaccine using the whole virus with all of its proteins is going to provide a broader immune response that’s harder to evade than a vaccine that relies on only a few epitopes of a single protein of a virus. The Sars-Cov-2 mRNA vaccines rely on only a few epitopes of spike (S) protein’s receptor binding domain [RBD] and N-terminal domain [NTD] for its antigen. The NTD and RBD are the portions of this fast mutating single strand RNA virus that mutate the most.
Furthermore, we’ve aggrandized all the successful vaccines for viruses. Though we don’t even recognize all the failed attempts to make vaccines for a number of different viruses including Hep C, HiV, Epstein Barr, MERS, Sars-1, West Nile, Norovirus, Herpes HSV-1, etc. Vaccines are not always successful. More often they’re not.
*_"There is no such thing as a Ministry of Truth and why it is important to challenge conventional “wisdom” - A personal view"_*
I burst out laughing when he started talking about how Wifi causes cancer. This is textbook pseudoscience that should raise red flags.
Maybe he meant that his WIFE causes cancer. ;)
WiFi can cause cancer if it’s powerful enough more likely to just give you an internal sunburn like if you walk in front of one of those big white cones on radio towers
You might be thinking about microwaves
people have gotten tumors from cellphones you tool lol! it's proven.
You should try to grow 2 of the same plants 1 next to your wifi router and 1 on the other side of your house. And see the results.
People who tend to not do adequate research and have no idea what they're talking about, loooove to use the word pseudoscience. They think it makes them look smarter, when in actually they appear very uninformed.
At 10:25, you say that the DPT vaccine "has never been pulled" and that it never caused damage, but RFK was talking about the whole-cell DPT vaccine (which was pulled in 1996) and not the acellular DTap and Tdap vaccines you are referring to.
Also, a paper put out in 1994 by the National Academy of Medicine said that there was a lack of sufficient evidence either for or against neurological damage from the DPT vaccines. The lawsuits and accused damage were the impetus for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Acellular pertussis vac was discontinued due to fear of significant adverse effects but not because there was an actual proof of rare but significant adverse effects
Much of the impetus for this research has been the concern that pertussis vaccine could cause significant and permanent neurological damage. Recent reviews of these data do not support such an association (2) but the desire for an alternate vaccine continues because of the high rate of minor local and systemic adverse reactions following pertussis immunization .
Benefit vs risk ratio was still overwhelmingly in favor of cellular vaccine . Just that accelular was better now there are thoughts of bringing older vaccine back because of higher effectiveness .
This youtuber is a shill who thinks he's smarter than he actually is.
Unlike most politicians, at least RFK has the balls to actually stand up to the corruption in EPA, big pharma, and politics as a whole. It's wild they would rather have a dementia puppet or orange man over someone with an actual track record.
As for the the poster above me. Covid was the perfect example of politics and money, as well as twisted policies and pressure influencing the said "rarity" of negative effects and said "efficacy" of said vaccines. They also censored and deplatormed everyone and ANYONE talking negative about it or having negative experiences. Literally social media had carte Blanche to shut any account or Facebook group down. I was a part of about 5 groups that had daily events of adverse effects and doctors, out of fear refused to acknowledge these random neurological or cardiac symptoms as anything but some sudden event that was unrelated to the shot. I know personally nurses AND doctors who were fired for speaking their mind about it.
This didn't happen in a vacuum and if you think it did then you're just spreading the real misinformation.
It would be nice to have RFK on your show. I am sure he would accept your invite.
I'm sure "Dr" Wilson wouldn't.
@debunkthefunkwithdrwilson awesome compilation ! It must have been miserable for you to watch the narrative on media twist and turn so inaccurately through the process in 2020. I was already OSHA certified in filtration at the time so it seamed like madness for everyone wearing masks. I knew they were not only ineffective, but gave people false confidence resulting in potentially spreading Covid19 faster🤦🏼♂️ . I posted a manufacturer product limitations sheets showing this and was censored. Just for showing product limitations!
RFK is a strong advocate for freedom of speech and proponent of engaging in conversation . It would be great to hear you 2 break it down .
I am still confused about basics like if COVID19 MRNA is technically a vaccine if it doesn't prevent transmission? Would it be more accurate to call it a treatment?
There’s no point. Irresponsible prevaricators like RFK will just call scientists liars, despite his inability to produce any scientific refutation. He is full of excrement
He definitely would. RFK seems to be talking to anyone and everyone that will have him
@@lukerichardson2404 Yup. As a side note, it's scary how there are 4 replies to this comment and yet yours is the only one I can see, aside from the one I wrote.
watching this a week or so after the 2024 election and its honestly frightening
Among the many other things, I wish people would stop calling it the Spanish Flu. It did not originate in Spain, but Spain was neutral during WW1 and freely reported the pandemic while other countries censored the news.
Kansas City epidemic doesn’t have the same ring to it.
True. Look to the yellow brick road. It came from Kansas (probably via pigs and started on an army base). How about we call it the Good 'Ole US Flue.
@@superclaymaster but it is a great name for a funk band.
@@paulspence7600 Interestingly thats where the new vaccine was being tested... just before all those soldiers vaccinated went off to fight in the war.
More! More! More! (I yell as I smash my fists holding my fork an knife on the table over and over)
Thank you for this insightful video. It's a short but powerful medium of knowledge and logical reasoning.
By debunking an unqualified individual on the subject, you've done a service to everyone. The person in question is evidently clueless about what he asserts, having not acquainted himself with the science nor shown any inclination towards understanding it. His claims stand on shaky ground.
Your effort in creating this important video is commendable - please continue your work.
I pledge my full support to your endeavors. Keep going strong.
Calling an mRNA gene delivery system a vaccine is very deceptive
In the Canadian review paper you cite, if 69% of pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy cases analysed were not due to vaccination, then 31% of cases analysed WERE due to vaccination?
YIKES !!!
Yeah try again sunshine. "Overall, 40 patients (70.2%) had a more likely alternate cause for their encephalopathy or encephalitis than vaccination. In 9 patients (15.8%), the evidence for a more likely alternate cause was based only on presence of symptoms suggestive of an infective process (e.g., cough, coryza, wheeze, sore throat, diarrhea, and hepatomegaly, in combination or alone) unrelated to vaccination."
"For 3 patients (5.3%), there was evidence for an association with vaccine,"
"The remaining 14 patients (24.6%) classified as indeterminate did not meet criteria for alternative etiology or evidence for association with vaccine;"
So only 3 patients over 21 years were linked to the vaccines.
As there was about 4,891,000 children of the vaccination age by the study in 2001 and about an 87% vaccination rate which would mean that 4,255,170 were vaccinated in that time that would equate to a risk factor of 0.00007%.
😂😂😂
Answer this on a video please, who funds the FDA? Where most of their money to do their job comes from? Thanks
mostly from tax payers
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Same as the funding given to Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu to create a deadly flu (coronavirus) at the Wu funded by NIAID.
Government does not produe an income of its own, all government and government agencies are paid through taxes: what exactly is the point you are trying to make.
Tax payer pay for the same regulatory bodies to manufacture the disease with tax dollars then then produce the treatment for that disease using tax dollars.
You really should be taking that issue up with that government and industry you trust so much.
@@MessiahNonEst The OP asked where does most FDA funding coming from, I said it's mostly tax payers......I have no idea how your rant relates to that
@@MessiahNonEst Ooh you are a clever clogs, NFT says it is our taxes (true) you ultimately agree with him but have to do a little patronising explanation of how government is funded. Did you just find that out?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman "I have no idea"
No need to tell me, I've had plenty of first hand of your "I have no idea"
Research: no idea
Use the Internet to research: no idea
Acronym refering to medical conditions: no idea
That Ben Hu began the flu from a lab in Wu: no idea
That 50% is negative not a positive in regards to safety: no idea.
I've got a bullet proof jacket that only stops 50% - ever second shot - half the bullets penertrate, for sale.
Only worn onne, a few holes approx 9mm in diameter, two holes #45, the owner no longer needs is as they died from a bullet wound.
You interested?
RFK jr mentions a study where they tested monkeys and found that ethyl-mercury (or methyl?) indeed left the blood quickly but upon autopsy were found in large concentrations in the brain. it would be nice for you to address this as well..
Found in the brain, but decreases over time. There's also no evidence it does anything to hamper development either. People just see "mercury" and enter panic mode without thinking. That's how RFK Jr. gets you.
That study was in the early 2000’s and thimerosal was removed from most vaccines in 2001. A great example of scientists identifying a potential risk, testing for it, and then action being taken to make vaccines safer. Isn’t that a good thing? Wouldn’t it be more worrisome if they never found anything wrong with the vaccines?
If you can find the name of the study, I'll happily take a closer look.
Read up on the use of adjuvants in vaccines. It’s still not really understood why it is they cause the immune system to increase its response.
@@geraintwdit was done by Burbacher
Dr Wilson, there were also 2 more cardiac deaths in the placebo group - myocardial infarction. So the count was 4 v 3
Yes, conveniently ignored by the malicious anti-vaxxers.
Myocardial infarction isn't a death, it's death of some of the heart muscle. But nevertheless, 3 extra deaths is completely insignificant.
@@kevinklassen4328 the two deaths were due to myocardial infarction.
@@kevinklassen4328 it was on the list of deaths though
@kevinklassen4328 extra deaths insignificant. Big claim for a small study there broseph
I wonder if the people that listen to RFK Jr. for medical advice go to their M.D. when they need legal advice.
Says the guy who takes medical advice from politicians
@@michaelstevenson8069 - Nope, only from qualified medical professionals.
“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations”
“If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU unit, and you’re not going to die."
- $leepy Joey Bribe’m, 2001
@@lw1zfog - COVID in 2001? , I don't remember that pandemic but Orange Mussolini did have good suggestions for the more recent pandemic (2020) "..we hit the body with a tremendous...ultraviolet light or just very powerful light...supposed we brought the light inside the body...and I see disinfectant knocks it out in a minute and is there a way we can do something like that...by injection inside or almost a cleaning..."
Then Orange (courtroom sleepy) Mussolini admits to Bob Woodward that he knew COVID was "deadly stuff" but "I wanted to always play it down". Translation, he lied to the people he was supposed to protect.
Your fallacy is: appeal to authority.
I don't care if the highschool dropout is right and the president of NASA is wrong. Arguments stand and fall on their own merits.
44:12 in the U.K. most of our regulatory agencies such as the MHRA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) get most of their funding from the industries that they regulate. In fact the CAA is required to obtain all of its funding from the fees it charges, which includes annual airworthiness tests on aircraft. I’m not sure about the MHRA, I would think that it was 75% at least.
All these people complaining about pharma companies paying for their submissions to be assessed never seem able to come up with who should pay for it. It's kind of strange that they want pharma companies to be subsidised by having someone else pay for this process.
ua-cam.com/video/OpaVCTtxBnE/v-deo.html
The media have been captured by big pharma, CNN, MSNBC, and the other big media outlets all brought to you by Pfizer, stands to reason you are only going to hear what Pfizer wants you to hear. Make them liable for their products and see the change that takes place. Pfizer are the proud holders of the largest fine for fraudulent practices, $2.3 billion in 2009. They have also admitted that the vaccines can be shed, so be careful who you snuggle up close to..
How about the billions of dollars in profits the pharmaceutical companies make. And instead of paying 130 billions of dollars to fund foreign wars we put that money towards our public health agencies… just a thought
Thank you SO much for producing these debunks - it’s such important and valuable work you are doing. Thank you thank you
Baaaa 🐑
Imagine being pro vax still 🤯
Lab leak… adverse reactions, censorship, efficacy, safety, transmissibility…. all of it was misinformation!
@@pct2025Still waiting for evidence to show that. Start with the lableak?
Great video! Love the long form, point by point format. Best video you've put out so far.
That sheep talks!
@@Lp78Ch Wow, way to display your ignorance and inability to communicate as an adult. Does your mom & dad know you're up this late?
@@lufcharrison2234says the ignorant bashing sheep who simply follows a different shepherd.
Once they stopped pairing Ethel mercury with Lucy mercury, all the shenanigans stopped.
Ironic that I knew a great guy with autism that his only signs of autism was some stuttering, but less than RF J.
RFK has a disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions, causing voice to be scratchy...not related to disability
@@mikfin210 It is a disability - he can't talk properly.
he meant it’s not a mental disability, likely remembering the president who seems to be thought to have one
straight from the FDA website "The FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives." Read that last line again. Then read it again Ben. You make it sound like "oh yeah if Ivermectin (or whatever generic, expired patent drug) was shown to work, it could have gotten EUA along side the vaccines and everything else" and clearly that is NOT the case. When you gloss over something like this it makes people question your integrity.
Yeah well Ivernectin still doesn’t work with COVID
@@topologyrobthey screwed up the double blind study, they gave them a choice to take them during the second and third stage of the trial.
What "certain criteria" are they talking about it..
The standard for "emergency use" is not very robust. From the same document: "Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that "may be effective" to prevent, diagnose, or treat serious or life-threatening diseases" 'MAY be effective " doesn't mean that it necessarily will BE effective.
I am a first responder. I can say for a fact there are more people with negative effects from the vaccine than people that did not get it.
Love the T-shirt!!!!! 👍😎👍
Why don't you go to a RFK Jr. townhall and press him during a Q&A session?
Even if I don't agree with his vaccine views, he's not going to ban vaccines, and his other views concerning out country make him more than qualified to run for president. I will be voting for him. 🇺🇸 🫡
Also, thank you for this video. You got a sub.
"he's not going to ban vaccines"
Well, that's because he can't. But he will do all he can to spread vaccination doubt through his choice of key people in government agencies, and then you get the type of things that happened in Florida, where the Surgeon-General goes in and removes key parts of an analysis in order to make the COVID vaccines look bad (the removed key parts actually made them look good). You'll get companies being unwilling to sell vaccines, meaning the US population will be exposed to various infectious diseases and the associated disruption of daily life. China and Russia will watch with a mixture of happiness and concern, as a weak America is good for them, but those infectious diseases spreading around is a bad thing for all.
You need to reassess the ethics of your choice.
@@p.w.harris9883 Do I? And whom, may I ask, are you voting for that is so much better?
@@LiveStoicism I haven't decided yet. Not Joe and Not Trump is all I can say for now. Either choice would be unethical.
It’s because they affirm Joe’s biases.
Since it’s so high profile now, and so easy to win, a debate should happen. Seems like a great opportunity to put it to rest once and for all.
"Seems like a great opportunity to put it to rest once and for all."
We've had a multitude of debates of creationists vs evolutionary biologists over the last few decades. Despite the latter bringing all the evidence, some 40% of all Americans still deny evolution. Kennedy has had plenty of discussions with experts in the field, and yet he STILL blames thimerosal for autism. Debate is what he wants, as he can use it to claim there still is uncertainty (why else would there be debate?!). It's the exact same thing climate pseudoskeptics do, and how the tobacco industry spread doubt.
@@Marco-it2mr You’re referring to a philosophical debate, which are interminable.
Not the same for real world, measurable info.
@danielplainview6527 dude evolution isn't some philosophical bullshit but real science. You're sounding an awful lot like a creationist right now.
That's cute but very naive. That video illustrates that every thing rfk says has already been debates and proven wrong for some time and yet rfk still tells the same lies. The problem is ppl like rfk are too deluded to believe truth.
@@danielplainview6527 Eh? evolution vs creationism is measurable info. Vaccines not causing autism is measurable info. Climate change due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is measurable info. Doesn't stop people from going for debates where they deny all that data. Notably, often with some appeal to emotion, like "atheism is bad, evolution is atheism, so reject evolution", "people who deny vaccines cause autism are bought and paid for by Big Pharma, don't believe them", and "AGW is all about extortion taxes from people, and to give government more power".
"It is very hard for a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it" Upton Sinclair the Jungle
Thank you for making this effort. I know it can feel like pissing into a relentless hurricane of misinformation at times, but your voice matters man. Keep up the great/essential work.
You can’t be serious that you believe his disgrace lies
@@sally6102 What are some examples of things Dr Wilson said that you consider to be lies?
@@lindaward This man suppose to be a scientist but never discusses real health and how to stay healthy. That shows who he works for. He knows nothing about human health.
@@amyalewinehe knows his chemical elements for sure, but what’s wrong with Kennedy asking questions? Especially after all these mothers confront him about things they noticed with their kids?
@@storage-space4927I am talking about Wilson, not Kennedy
I don't get why RFKjr. is constantly saying,
- he is not anti-vaccine
- he is so open and looking to search out the best and latest science
- "show me where I'm wrong"
What does he say to these very obvious criticisms of his words?
he's been shown where he's wrong so many times but just carries on as if nothing happened and continues spouting lies. Case in point: he claims (as you can see in this video) that vaccines don't undergo place-controlled clinical studies but you can look at the covid vaccine clinical trials that are published online and see that they are place-controlled using saline. He relies on his followers being too stupid to even check I guess.
RFK enjoys lying
@@Sceince007
Yeah he does!
I cant validate everything but Dr. Wilson did misrepresent Rogans statement on vitamin D being a cure for Covid. Cuz Rogan never said "if u replace the Vitamin D in a sick person they will get better." As Wilson claims he did. @29:46 Rogan was talking about it as a preventative only, and never with certainty, just him talking about his logic of them being linked.
He also misrepresented rogan claiming that ivermectin helped him... He said he took it and other things and he got better quickly, he never claimed that ivermection was the reason. If you are "debunking" someone you have to stick only to the facts or you debunk yourself. There are other problems with this vid that are basically the same misinformation tactics that big pharma uses, and they are no better than rfk Jr.
Yeah they act like they are so smart saying vitamin d doesn’t cure covid well duh.but if you have low d levels when infected you get way sicker that’s a fact they want to hide so you get vaxed every year
Wilson didn't say that Rogan was saying that though. He said it was a reasonable question to ask, then explained that they got an answer to that question
@@richardelliott84 I think you should listen to the time stamp I posted. He does say Rogan said it would get rid of the sickness to replace the vitamin D. Hence his metaphor about cleaning up the ashes.
Maybe he didn't say it her but he said elsewhere. Joe Rogan is a crook.
"In an e-mail dated 17 December 1999, Verstraeten wrote to Robert Davis and copied Frank DeStefano with the subject line, ‘It just won’t go away’; in the body of the e-mail he wrote that ‘all the harm is done in the first month'"
"Just over two months later, Verstraeten had produced a new draft of the analysis - a thirty page report titled ‘Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase 1. Verstraeten made a number of questionable judgement calls, such as excluding all children who did not receive 2 polio vaccines (which reduced the number of zero exposure patients), combining the zero exposure group with the
"Even then, the relative risk of autism for the highest exposure group (>62.5 µg) was 2.48. On 19 March 2000, Verstraeten e-mailed DeStefano to explain that he had run a separate analysis on 10 premature infants from Northern California Kaiser and found that the highest exposure group had a relative risk of developing autism of 5.0 finding of an OR of 5.4 for premature"
@@MessiahNonEst there is absolutely 0 evidence for autism and vaccines, it was extremely scrutinized and tested because of the extreme panic, literally half if not all researchers went out of there way to see if this was true, and they found absolutely nothing to prove it. there is no exposure risk to a nueruolgical condition that isnt even related to how any vaccines functions in the body. not only that but it pushes a condition to be viewed in a negative light
Thank you for doing these videos! I was interested in hearing the buzz over RFK and saw Lex Fridman's shout-out to your channel. "Do your own research" often times seems to do more harm than good because I am not an expert! It would be preposterous for me to try to understand every single possible field when there are experts in these fields. Dr. Hotez disagreeing to debate on Rogan seems to unfortunately certify RFK Jr. and Rogan as trusted sources of information.
Agree, I’m not qualified to do my own research on such an in depth topic. I can’t know everything so I rely on experts.
they are more trusted than statist sources
Did Lex talked about it his RFK jr. Podcast?
Hotez is afraid he isnt correct and it will ruin his credibility.
@@akashbhargava906 Lex gave a shout out to Dr. Wilson and others who have counter arguments to claims RFK Jr. makes. During the episode, he mostly just listened without challenging. It was good if someone desired to listen to RFK Jr.’s claims, but there wasn’t an actual discussion.
I think we're beyond referencing studies. Kenny goes into the flaws he perceives in certain studies.
To debunk him, you need to also cover who funded the studies, who those running the studies are affiliated with, are there any conflicts of interest, and then breakdown how the studies were run and whether there are any flaws in them.
So he's just moving the goal posts. First he wants studies that have saline placebos. When that was given he wanted studies on childhood vaccines that use saline placebos. When that was given now he's trying to move the goal posts again by claiming fraudulently that there are flaws.
@@Somniator7 he shouldn't even be moving the goal posts in the first place. That just shows he's a fraud and a liar. If he were honest he would accept his errors instead of doing what he's doing now.
WiFi radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
Im still not totally convinced that it's healthy
@@malcolmjelani3588 what, light?
If you're still concerned, realize that not only is it just another wavelength of light (but not harmful like uv), it's also extremely dim.
It's like a 20 watt bulb.
Also, it's the same as radio waves, and those have been bouncing around and going right through your body continuously for your whole life, that's how radios and TV, and even cell phones, work.
Remember, cell phones are really just walkie talkies that connect to very sophisticated towers, just hand held radios, there's nothing special going on.
These things have all been extensively tested and they have never given anyone cancer or anything else.
UV radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
This is my new favorite channel! Thanks for making content, I wish I would have found this channel sooner!
*"Ivermectin was tested in a randomised study in Columbia at a dose of 300 μg per kilogram per day for 5 days, but there was no discernible benefit. In a second, related trial carried out at five separate US locations, even doses of 390 to 470 g per kilogram per day for 3 days did not have any discernible effects."*
Just here to mock GM1221 .................
This is one of the comments I've been looking for, that guy is genuinely, worryingly unhinged.
@@iamjustkiwi Yes, GM1221 even refuses to acknowledge viruses exist. In my view there is little point arguing with people like that.
Also:
*In this meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials involving 3901 patients, favorable mortality results were limited to trials in high-prevalence regions, with no evidence that ivermectin had a mortality benefit in low-prevalence regions. Meta-regression found an association between the regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis and risk of mortality, with a decrease in RR of 39% for each 5% increase in strongyloidiasis prevalence.*
Ivermectin only showed positive benefits in regions where strongyloidiasis (intestinal parasites) were endemic, and not controlled for.
Are any of the funding sources of the papers you reference a conflict of interest in their findings?
@@philo3479hahah funding sources for a dude in his office?
Dang you answered my mercury question the same day i asked
I don't believe I've witnessed a more serious trouncing of misinformation.
It’s so hard for me to understand how our society worked so hard and made so much progress in the field of medicine that saved millions of lives and now we are witnessing an exact reversal of those hard-earned achievements which is increasingly putting our society at a grave risk.
@@philo3479 Hey Philo3479. You wrote the Hep B approval trial "had 147 subjects safety tested for 5 days with no placebo control."
Because when I looked Energix-B, had 6100 people in 58 clinical studies in 19 countries between 1984 - 1986, and was approved in 1989. It's still used. So I get the idea you made that up. *Can you explain what you wrote, perhaps name the study?*
@@philo3479 Dude. WTF are you talking about? *It was either a 3 or a 4 dose trial.* You appear to be randomly making stuff up.
"Summary of clinical findings on Engerix-B, a genetically engineered yeast derived hepatitis B vaccine.
Between February 1984 and August 1986 results have been obtained in 58 completed or ongoing clinical studies by 33 investigators in 19 countries on a yeast-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B). Among the 6100 subjects enrolled in these studies, 5664 subjects (150 normal neonates, 178 neonates of hepatitis B carrier mothers, 330 children aged 3-10 years, 3697 young healthy adults, 438 homosexual males, 110 older healthy adults, 139 drug addicts, 262 institutionalized mentally retarded patients, 59 thalassaemics, 25 sicklaemics, 270 patients on chronic haemodialysis and 6 haemophiliacs) received one or more (up to 4) injections of different doses of the yeast-derived vaccine according to either a 0, 1, 2, and 12 month or a 0, 1, and 6 month vaccination schedule."
*Edit: And it seems to me you are misreporting the RECOMBIVAX HB trials. Even the package insert says.....*
"In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to *147 healthy infants and children* (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for *5 days after each dose."*
and
"In a group of studies, 3258 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 10 mcg, *were administered to 1252 healthy adults* who were *monitored for 5 days after each dose."*
There is this also this article from 1985
"MERCK's RECOMBIVAX HB DNA-DERIVED HEPATITIS VACCINE APPROVED JUNE 23 AFTER FIVE-MONTH REVIEW; MERCK WILL BEGIN MARKETING IN JANUARY"
*That indicates it was trialed on 3000+ people before it was approved*
@@philo3479 Except of course you're *ignoring 50 years of safety studies.* Good grief, have a look on Scholar. I used "engerix b safety" and got 5,400 hits. *The first 7 pages were safety studies.* The most recent was May 2023. *
You've claimed to be "in the field". How is it you don't know basics? Autism was added to DSM3 in 1980, and DSM4 massively expanded the definition in 1998. Surely you are aware of that, and other diagnostic expansion?
* "Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease"
@@Muritaipet Vaccines are dangerous, you are wrong
Yes I would love to transport some of these knuckle heads to, say, 900 CE and watch them seek relief from certain dreadful ailments like polio or one of the various plagues or rabies w/o the drugs and surgical protocols we have today. They could see first hand why life expectancy was so short. They could, as well, see that one of the reasons for life expectancy being so high in developed countries is easy access to pharmacological interventions. I think they would be ready to claw their way back to the 20th-21st century just for the over the counter remedies.
As much I enjoy Joe Rogan he has tendencies towards conspiracies and mysterious which is entertaining but can get dangerous when it goes to health related topics
I mean saying big pharma cares more about profit than lives isint conspiricy
I dont agree with them saying all vaccines are bad there are good ones but also bad ones
@@boneleg6952so who do you see when you get sick? That's right, them big bad dangerous doctors, who will treat you with that poison.
Health related topics?
That would be clean real food, no drugs, medicines, chemicals, GMO's, toxins...etc....etc.....That is HEALth!!
Conspiracies are crimes and nothing more..... is there something wrong with looking to see if a crime has been committed?
Mysteries...oh you bet there are..... plenty of 'em....the biggest mystery of all is how people can be so damn gullible (and stupid) to buy into taking something that does not work, because what it is suppose to work against does not in fact exist short of the theater and propaganda by their perceived overlords
Most of what he says is wrong I won’t say if it’s lies or incompetence because I don’t know for sure but it’s really dangerous because he’s the most listened to guy in the country and people will think he’s right because he’s rich that’s a huge problem with our country we think rich people are smart and moral people and we think poor or sick people are must have done something to deserve it
Who still uses Thimiserol? I thought these were removed 20 years ago?
Only in some flu vaccines it is still used.
Multi-dose vials of any vaccine that may not be stored properly. It reduces both fungal and bacterial growth when multiple punctures of the latex seal occur.
June 2023:
Huge leap in breast cancer survival rate
Women diagnosed since 2010 have a much lower risk of dying than those diagnosed in the 1990s.
The number of people who die after a breast cancer diagnosis has decreased by two-thirds since the 1990s, a study of more than half a million women in England has shown.
The research has taken ten years to complete, says Carolyn Taylor, lead author of the study and an oncologist at the University of Oxford, UK. The analysis includes the 512,447 women in England who were diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer between January 1993 and December 2015; the researchers tracked the women until December 2020 using data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service.
@neverforget1971 Somehow all that wifi exposure and bad vaccines did not lead to more cancer deaths for woman
Joe Rogan is asking questions. He's not a propagandaist or somebody pedaling disinformation for profit he has an inquisitive mind and he's asking questions and that's what science looks like. I'm sure he would happily have you on the podcast. The reason people like Joe Rogan so much is because he's willing to question things and he follows truth. And then he questions "the truth" and then he brings on guests that have questions about "the truth." That's what science looks like. We are currently living through an opioid crisis caused by the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA lying. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people dead because pharmaceutical companies and the FDA lied. I think it's perfectly fine to be skeptical of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. Don't you?
why did Joe Rogan not question anything RFKjr said?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Why did Bayer infect thousand with HIV leading to thousands of AIDS deaths in France, Spain, Latin America and Asia by dumping a drug the FDA withdrew from the US market in those countries.
Why did the US government conspire with Bayer to allow it to happen?
And why was no one charged or held responsible for those sacrifices to Moloch?
Finally: Whose responsibe for more deaths directly attributed to peddling false medical information..... FRK Jr or those Rotund Farmers you shill for.
@@MessiahNonEst nice attempt at irrelevant deflection. That's all you've got now, isn't it?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Sorry I forgot you don't like looking in the mirror of scientism.
Question: Why should Joe Rogan have questioned anything RFK said. Because you think RFK is lying when he claimed no placebo trials have been conducted.
Is that all you got for a three hour video you haven't watched, you took on faith what dr flunky debunky to you to believe.
@@MessiahNonEst It's a clear example of RFKjr lying, ergo, he lies.
I've never been an RFK Jr. fan. It should not only be easy for any Dr. to debate him with the facts like Dr. Wilson, but should be their duty (paging Dr. Hotez).
What makes it easy to play chess with a pigeon? It will just sh!t on the board, knock pieces over, and then have all its friends loudly proclaim it won.
@@Marco-it2mr yeah I've seen that quote on the internet before as well
@@KrapvagThat quote has been trending in youtube debunking crusaders channels comments since Hortez opened his big gob.
I think the science community had a "debate" on an analogy to use in this regard: they came to a "concensus", the analogy is "settled".
This is the best piece of information I've seen to systematically break down RFK's arguments concisely and rationally. My wife and I were just exposed to RFK through town hall debate, which led to Rogan's interview and he came off as rational in those spaces (we knew nothing about him prior). But we had questions about how accurate his arguments are. He hits you with a bunch of information which you can't fact check on the spot so the arguments seem very rational and he seems to genuinely believe them. We searched around and found you, based on Sam Harris's recommendation. You broke things down calmly, rationally and concisely and we now feel informed accurately. Thank you for listing all the sources you cite. This is the quality media a healthy democracy needs to survive with educated citizens.
@@philo3479Translation: "I have no argument, so I resort to insults."
@@joeylafrond2472 Hey, do you get paid for every "rebuttal" you write? It's getting a little old. Try something more meaningful.
@@Lp78ChYes I do. Your mom gives me a kiss because she has somebody in her life that she can be proud of.
@kalimarus This is full of misinformation. Please see my comment above -- above when the comments are sorted with the newest first -- where I break it down.
@@philo3479 INCORRECT
Having personally known someone who went against the government and who won 3 6 digit settlements as a result i dont believe that adjuvants were always approved. In his military service he was able to win against the courts that the FDA unnaproved adjuvants used in military vaccines almost 20 years ago did in fact cause issues in service members. Squalene to be exact and i ask you if squalene isnt the problem why is it banned now and why was he able to win his court cases against the government because of it.
Thanks!
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
I love how RFK says these vaccines are not placebo tested but when it suits his narrative he cites studies comparing vaccine groups to the placebo groups.🤦🏽♂️
@@philo3479 That's not possible, given none of the childhood vaccines are mandated.
They are not tested against an actual, inactive placebo like saline. They are tested against another vaccine or sometimes against one of the vaccine adjuvants like the aluminum. When many parents questioned that, some researchers started terming the test substance a "comparator" because it is not an actual placebo. Read the package inserts! They are all archived online.
@neverforget1971 🥱
Thanks so much for your video. I watched the Joe Rogan episode and was punching my phone because of the ridiculous BS that was being said. Thanks for doing your part to provide clarity to the masses. Your videos should be required watxhing for ALL high-school students. Im serious...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"punching my phone".......I'm curious, did this help in any way. And have you thought about an anger management course.
Has anyone ever called him out real time on his claims of vaccine trials not being conducted? I’ve looked but couldn’t find it. The closest I could come is his definition of Placebo is different than the conventional definition.
There is constant miscommunication, as RFK jr. implies double blind placebo testing prior licensing on especially long term adversary health effects. And of course he is right on that with the Covid vaccin, because long term testing was not possible in order to come with a quick repsonse. In some interviews he was asked if it were his intention to prohibit the vaccine to the people, and he said that 'of course' he is not, he only doesn't want a mandate on vaccins that have not undergone the long term safety protocols that are standard for any other kind of medicine. He stated he is a liberal and everybody should make their own choice to take such a vaccin or not.
Therefore I among others think it's very important to have an in depth debate between him and a scientist who is very knowledgeable on the subject, to get to the detail of it. The censoring attempts only make this debate worse, or even suspicious...
The vaxxine trials did not even take in to account whether the vax prevented corona or not.
They had to rush at the speed of science
Bill Burr pretty much told him hes not a doctor or scientist and neither of them could be qualified to put out this information at mass
It’s interesting because he’s open to debating anyone anytime and debates have been planned but people back out. In the Joe Rogan podcast RFK mentioned there was going to be several scientists debating him at the same time and they still backed out. Strange indeed
awesome takedown
I loved your video. I learned more about variants of mercury and ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation. Id love to see you, him, and Rogan or Lex in a room to discuss these topics. +1 to your subscriber pool 😊
ua-cam.com/video/rs2Abw0NEBM/v-deo.html
Lex shouted out this channel before his with RFK, he’d totally facilitate that.
Ethylmercury: C2H5Hg+
Methylmercury: CH3Hg+
RFK Jr. needs to eat his own words and ‘stop this comic book description’ applied to his views on vaccines. He advocates understanding ‘the other side’ yet does none of it himself when it comes to anything scientific. He demonstrates his total lack of basic understanding of chemistry, let alone biochemistry and far beyond him to understand virology, immunology, vaccinology. And there remains no common language that each can understand each other,s ‘beef’
Sorry in avance for my bad english. I have a question regarding a study that Robert cited, the one where they found the mercury inside the monkies brain. I was hoping you would debunk that one, but you didn't mention it (or maybe I missed it?). Do you have any information about this? Thank you for your work.
He ignored it because he can't debunk it. This video was pathetic
He also repeated the lie that Ethyl Mercury is excreted from the body faster.
@@matthewsands3591It absolutely is. One can merely look at the half life of both, because ethyl decays faster. It takes 10 days for half a given amount of ethyl mercury to decay, wheras it takes 50 days for the same amount of methylmercury to decay. That's 5x as fast. And that's assuming it all accumulates.
@@Skidwell19 that's not true. It's already been established that Ethyl Mercury leaves the blood faster because it goes into the brain, not because it is excreted from the body.
@@matthewsands3591 I actually found this video very interesting and helpful. To be honest I rather be informed by a true scientist than a guy who says that the free market will solve the climate crisis.
Contact Rogan and put him straight
So if the ethylmercury was so benign why did they stop using it?
Misinformed public pressure? They found something better? They found something cheaper? Not hard to think of plausible explanations.
@@delfordchaffin5617 I think they were looking for an actual answer, not more questions.
@@delfordchaffin5617 copium ? hopium ? not hard to desperately reach for excuses whilst flatly refusing to face the elephant in the room. way to go kiddo ! 😂🤦🏽♂️🥴
@@delfordchaffin5617why do they still use it in vaccines given to African children then?
Thank you. I took notes to use in talking down my friend, who fell into RFKs web of lies.
In fairness, he did say that all he asked for was one study that showed they are safe and effective which showed a control group and cross analysis. One could not be obtained. He also stated that the rate of autism in the populous has skyrocketed since the 1960s-70s and that no one can understand why that happened.
"...and that no one can understand why that happened."
Which shows he isn't looking at the scientific literature.
And of course, he has repeatedly blamed the vaccines. First it was the thimerosal, then it was MMR, now it's the many vaccines, and he'll happily rinse and repeat these three arguments. That thimerosal is largely removed from just about all vaccines, and thus cannot explain the increase in autism at all, he doesn't care. That the MMR vaccine has repeatedly been shown not to be associated with autism, he doesn't care (he'll just cite some bad paper here and there to suggest it may, or refer to the child abuser Andrew Wakefield). That no new vaccines have been added to the schedule for decades (until recently), and thus also cannot explain a rise in autism, he does not care. He'll keep on pointing at the vaccines.
Autism only became a diagnosis in 1980, when it was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM3). In 1998 it became Austism Spectrum Disorder, in DSM4. Note that it's always been recognised it runs in families e.g. it has a genetic base
The rate is the same as it always was. Diagnoses have skyrocketed. RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods.
@@May_Day45 LOL @ "RFK is telling the truth." He wouldn't know the truth if it bit him. I wrote ....
"The rate is the same as it always was. _Diagnoses have skyrocketed._ RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods."
I notice you didn't address that.
I'll also note that ASD is a description of behavioural characteristics. Go read them. Half the people in these comments, you included, are probably on the spectrum.
I trust you now feel like someone with a severe problem, who deserves to be stigmatised by RFK
@@May_Day45 Yes, he's telling the truth! The V industry naturally pushes the notion that it is all genetic. But genetics require a TRIGGER. I think RFK allows that vaccines probably are not the ONLY contributor. Rather, maybe other environmental toxins build up & set the stage, & then 4-5 vaccines at once may push a child over the edge. Untold thousands of parents have SEEN it happen!
"Exposure to mercury can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with autism, and the similarities extend to neuroanatomy, neurotransmitters, and biochemistry."
The sad part is that not enough people will see this video.....the sadder part is that some who do will dismiss it because it doesn't fit their narrative.
@@philo3479 I don't think you have an understanding of irony.
@@May_Day45 I think you need to look into the word indoctrination....and exhibit quite frankly.
@@May_Day45 Now I'm confused. What's your point?
@@aaronhall5715 Well I think they are attempting to say the vast majority of the worlds medical professionals, governments, academics, public servants et al, have all been indoctrinated with false information, by a vast nefarious something.
And only they, the chosen few, know the truth.
There's a reason why RFK Jr. is a career politician and not a career scientist. But he sure likes to talk like he's one. I give him a couple more months of "fame" until he goes way off the rails.
He's not already off the rails?
@@lindaward haha, fair enough.
09:12 They did not tested whether aluminium accumulated in the body, they only tested blood and hair…if aluminium accumulated in the central nervous system, would have they been able to find out ?
10:05 RFK is talking about DTP, not DTaP. He is not lying.
15:17 well if they got sued and lost money…weren’t they in the wrong ? Shouldn’t they be winning their lawsuits if their vaccines were effectively safe ? Isn’t it how justice work ?
18:34 How do you catch hepatitis B ? No one argued about the severity of it, just the way it’s transmitted.
20:00 Have you wondered why the studies always focus on ONE vaccine, as if they were taken in a vacuum ? You are expected to take more than 50 in your life, where are the studies that compare longitudinally vaccinated and unvaccinated people for overall health ? (Those studies exist by the way like Hooker & Miller)
These are all good points. I don’t think everything said in this “debunking” video is just not convincing. It’s interesting that they ended up removing Thimerosal from most vaccine anyways. The statements don’t really add up to me… we determined it’s safe, but want to remove it as a precautionary measure. doesn’t really check out to me.
Thank you for being you know, actually intelligent
I'm interested in hearing where you got claims 1 and 2 from, especially the second. Bobby doesnt cite sources very often, other than the Johns Hopkins uni graphs, so where can I read about the DTP vaccine? And are you sure they arent talking about the same vaccine? Seems to me like the one that dr Wilson was talking about was the exact same (the "a" seems to be short for "and". "Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis" vaccine versus "Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis" vaccine).
It bothers me a lot that you didn't acknowledge the other stuff the guy in the vid pointed out. I'll to say the same for the things he himself didnt talk about, that were featured in the original podcast. None of this is gonna stop me from voting RFK (all the way), since he is very libertarian and only wants to research this all further. However, I think peddling conspiracy theories like these (to the extent that they are conspiracy theories) is very harmful to the trust people need to have when it comes to medicinal advice and other science.
And for the last thing you said, he did in fact mention what you are looking for at 19:54. The very first link he shared under "vaccines don't cause autism" is about an experiment that did test with multiple vaccines. They used 4 sets of vaccines, showing no correllation. Most of the relevant text is on page 3, but you might as well read it all, its only a few pages. copy and paste in your browser or click the link in the description
ua-cam.com/users/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbjc3a1pzNUF1cEtxanNoSmRNMWJ2bEliVkhfd3xBQ3Jtc0tuakRacGZvWVJsVl84TlZJWE40bkNQRmxTck1Hb1dUVTk0VEtMWFFEZWFQcWFUZ3lMOUh6MHItZnVBXzVkajdBY2llWU9lVUl2OFRROGY5bElSTEJXU0Z3aWxqQUlteWQwU2JwUUJIWVVuLWZNZzhUbw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fautismsciencefoundation.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2Fvaccine.2019.pdf&v=sugCJNAPF9o
They did not "tested" - you lost me there
Thanks for your endless work and efforts for humanity
47:55, JRE wasn't dangling money payable to Dr. HOTEZ, but to a charity of his choice. I think a charity unless fraudulent, is bound to do more good than harm, and debating an "anti-vaxxer" especially when that person is running for presidential elections is indeed the more responsible thing to do. So, to decline such an offer doesn't seem like the best course of action.
Yeah but it's not OKAY to debate anti vaxxers becuz reasons.
Enjoy your new health secretary....
No surprise the Rogan bro's and RFK Jr followers in the comment section won't refute anything Dr Wilson said.
They won’t even dare respond to you as well . 🙂
I will push back on a couple of things. The media were absolutely disingenuous saying Joe took "horse dewormer" when ivermectin is a common drug given to humans. And Joe wasnt saying Vit D will cure covid, he said Vit D deficiency is a big issue and could lead to a weaker immune system and thus more susceptible to severe covid symptoms.
@@dkoliregardless of how they refer to it, the fact he still took ivermectin goes a LONG way to discredit him as someone worth taking seriously on basically anything other than getting TBIs from sport fighting - something he clearly seems to have experience with.
@@dkoli There is nothing disingenuous about pointing out the fact that Rogan has well documented history of promoting quackery/pseudo-science.
@@iamjustkiwi I never said he was did I.
I listen to multiple other science videos. Why didn’t UA-cam’s algorithms recommend Debunk the Funk? Not once, when I get recommended a lot of other things that make no nonsense.
This is an interesting point. If this hadn’t come up on Reddit, I never would’ve found it. Subbed, liking, and commenting
I literally had to search “rfk debunked” to find this.
This channel doesn't seem very algorithm friendly, despite the content being very informative and very good. The videos are pretty informal, very long, and don't have a very high production budget for a team to edit or design the thumbnails and videos (at least, that's what it seems like to me, especially since he makes these videos in his free time). I think his presentation is the biggest reason why the algorithm doesn't spread his videos. His subscriber base is still pretty small too. It's a real shame.
Hope to see the channel grow and develop a lot more since science misinformation only seems to become more and more relevant.
All I can say is I'm soooooo glad that I didn't get vaccinated 🍿. Continue.....
Why do you boast about being a complete whacko with no regard for others?
As always, thank you for the work you put into doing these videos. Combating these high confidence yet low-information people is so important.
By low information people you are referring to me.
I had a vaccine injury twenty years ago and i've read everything I can to try to understand it.
Most of the scientific literature is paid for by the companies making the drugs.
I don't know how you trust the same companies that told us opioids were not addictive. They had studies proving that opiods were not addictive.
Are you able to cite any of the studies claiming that opioids are not addictive (reminds me of how the benefits of anti-depressants have been grossly over stated)?
Is he coming on you show? You have a open invitation to anyone you do a video on don't you? That would be interesting to see
exactly, you don't see RFK trying to debunk thus guy, he'd be happy to debate him face to face, this guy is a condescending fraud, he pleads to people's need to be right.
What boils my blood is that, he’s not even a scientist. RFK i mean.
You mean "Dr." Wilson.
RFK
@@Waevplay Dr. Wilson is not even a medical doctor.
@@doromalnYou do understand people with PhDs use the honorific title, Doctor, right.
@@diandian9827 But he's trying to communicate about health and immunology, and he's cherry-picking his info in a biased way.
There is only one periodic table
He says periodic tables 😂
That's both true and false. I can confirm I have seen multiple periodic tables.
Old ones, that didn't have all the current elements.
And multiple hard copies, which can only be described as periodic tables
Just winding you up. I actually thought your comment was observant and funny
@@Muritaipet @Muritaipet "How shall I mock the:
Common Cold Unit..... Errrrr....no.
Human Challenge Trials...... May or may not happen yet. But hey the future predicts the present right Einstein: E=Mc2?
Dr Flunky💉Junkie got schooled and you're still following the fool you tool.
On the transmission of respiratory viruses.
When asked: Therefore they can infect the people standing around them?
Dan the flunk💉junkie replied: "That doesn't checkout really"
@Muritaipet "dr flunky: how shall i mock thee: I dont engage with virus deniers"
Oh and by the way: now you're canceling your subscription, you not wanting to be associated with a virus denying charlatan..... See yeh🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
An example of hoe one can misspeak on s podcast and his was prepared.
@@MessiahNonEst How shall I mock thee, let me count the ways ................
OMG, I just clicked! You guys both have the cultist / great leader mentality!!! So you have some video that "destroys Wilson" I'm guessing? And this will... do something?
*And you think I care about Wilson. Oh that's absolutely priceless!!!*
@messiahnonest 1 day ago
Definitely the latter. The guy got schooled on being a fool,he knows so much that is not true.
ua-cam.com/video/dDe4zMqtE2E/v-deo.html
@Goodmorning1221- 20 hours ago
@messiahnonest That link is gold. We have to keep posting it. No need to argue anymore with the trolls
@@DrSurirose a fundamental error that can make some of his listeners lose trust! He seems like a genuine guy. I wonder if he knows that all his scientific arguments are fake news. He probably does. At the end of the day, he is a politician.
My buddy sent me your video. I appreciate your calm, methodical approach to debunking. Keep up the good work.
I apreciate your effort to shed some light into this topic rather than just disregard it as undeserving of any time. A bunch of JFK's claims seem outright absurd and outragous to most regular people. But if as much as one thing he says holds water, that's already one too many. I'm specially interested on his claims of systemic capture and perverse insentives on the regulatory bodies and the industry at large. Those can't be explained away with data from these very sources. It's like debunking accusations that a government is corrupt by using data from the same corrupt government.
People would not be at the current level of scrutiny and distrust of the medical industry had they not commited blunders before. The absolutely mainstream and uncontested position on the current opiod crisis in america is that it was caused by a mixture of negligence and naivity by practitioners and propaganda and biased research by the pharma industry. We can't pretend things like that never happened, and we can't naively trust every scientific paper when academia itself recognizes that almost half of peer reviewed published research (including medical) ends up proving unreproduceable (unreproducibility crisis) and most of medical research is indeed funded by multi-national pharma companies.
I think the journalist Briahna Joy Gray and Dr. Vinay Prasad (both pro vaccine and very skeptical of RFK Jr) did a much better analysis of his claims in Brie's podcast "bad faith". They were more focused, and despite Bria not really siding with Kennedy, she did an excelent job at steel-maning him and coming into it already knowing what were the "buts" and "what ifs" that RFK or some like-minded person would have to the most obvious and imediate rebutals. She really was making an effort to find where the failure points are indeed. Your video, in comparison, just seemed too surface level and comformist to dissuade people who are already distrustful of the scientific aparatus.
"Most regular people" isn't a good measure of intelligence. Most people are pretty stupid. Most of what RFK says seems on point and correct to me. Saying that something "sounds" absurd without counting whether there are facts or evidence supporting it seems a little ignorant to me.
@@SG-zp5uy I'm not uzing "most regular people" as a mesuring stick for the correctness of an opinion. Just as an assesment of public opinion. RFK wants to run for president afterall. Public opinion is very important for those goals.
@@buzinaocara It's important to note then if you're going to say that's what people think. I also don't really agree that most people think that way about what he says. Mainstream media which is corrupt likes to paint him in a certain light and people follow suit for that reason, but not the ones who are actually paying attention. He's also right about vaccines and I don't like how you're trying to stay in the middle ground and say that both sides are right when he's clearly right and the entire vaccine industry is corrupt.
Didn't realize that JFK was still around to make any claims at all!
Seriously though, the podcast with Briahna Joy Gray and Dr. Prasad was definitely not more "focused". They spent more time talking about broad, vague points regarding how Big Pharma is too powerful and not enough time on the specific claims of RFK Jr.
Dr. Wilson cuts out the noise and just gets right to the point of why RFK Jr.'s claims are BS and probably lies. He deals with the claims directly and succinctly, and does not bloviate needlessly like the Gray and Prasad discussion so obviously did.
Big Pharma definitely needs to be reined in, probably nationalized. Glad we agree there!
But their mistakes are not the only reason citizens have a poor understanding of medicine. It is also that there is a cottage industry of con artists like RFK Jr. that exist to spread nonsense for profit.
@@SG-zp5uy "He's also right about vaccines " What is he specifically right about with regards to vaccines? Which vaccine? Pick a specific vaccine and negative outcome.