I forgot to mention if you have a stereo bass that collapses badly to mono, remaking into stereo with any of these methods still doesn't improve the mono, instead you can use a utility plugin to playback only the left or right side as the middle instead of the mono sum , that is a usually a big improvement, and then you can re-stereo it I also totally forgot Steve Duda (Xfer) made a free dimension expander plugin, I had already figured it out by that point and have just been in the habit of using a delay to do it. You can just go grab that instead. At least you know how it works now though!
@@Bthelick I LOVE YOUR CHANNEL. the sub track, in this case.. in wich frecuency do you cut? Between 41Hz and 82Hz with LOW Pass filter? Or on the same Frecuency that you cut on the track of the Bass (62Hz)?
I watched probably 100 hours of music production tutorials on UA-cam. I normally don"t write comments, but this just hits different! Thanks for sharing your hard earned knowledge, with the people.
*Important: please bare in mind when I say things like "parallel distortion is not going to work", My advice is largely intended for beginners and these are initial guidelines that will help you (or rather keep you 'out of trouble' ) in a majority of scenarios. I break these 'rules' all the time, because I know why , where , when and how through experience. Until you gather that same experience my advice always errs on the side of caution.
Any chance you might do a video breaking down tracks like “1949” by Honey and Badger? Maybe explaining what elements of those tracks are beginner friendly vs not beginner friendly etc? Hopefully that question makes sense in a way that is relevant to the purpose of your channel 😂
I just came back from Hard Summer 2024. While I think I have a pretty diverse taste in music, I’m mainly a Hip-Hop/Rap head. Hearing so much House music in two days while dancing nonstop has literally made me realize how sick the House genre is. Been producing, mixing, and mastering my own music for 4 years now and you were the first channel I came across when I looked up tutorials on House (cause at this point I’m addicted lol). I gotta say, I feel lucky AF to be listening to your years of knowledge and experience. I’m remixing all my old songs into house mixes and it’s about to be so much fun cause of you. Thank you!
I’ve been watching tons of tutorials for the last 7 years, and man, let me tell you, you are the best so far. I wish I had learnt from you since the beginning. Keep going!
it feels like like im in the club, but im also learning how the beat is working too. Never have i wanted a dj set where the dj explains everything they're doing, this is great!
Been watching vids/producing for nearly a decade and can confirm tutorials like yours feel like they consolidated years…if only I had these back when I started. Newbies you don’t know how good you got it with this dude
Watched countless music production channels (and some are actually very good), but I now consider this one as the best. Straight to the point, simple and clear explanations, also very good tastes, no endless "hey guys thanks for blablabla" introduction or 1min VPN advert. PLUS you spend a moment to show your presets and sometimes share patches for free. Experience sharing and generosity at his best, HATS OFF for Bthelick.
That "energy pool" analogy with the pink noise has to be THE BEST explanation I have ever heard... and I have studied audio production and engineering, attended many masterclasses (including several tutored by some of the world's biggest producers), and, of course, watched a three billion UA-cam videos on the subject, over the last 25 years. Fair play! First vid of yours I've ever seen, and you have a new subscriber 👌👌👌
I have the impression I have just discovered the Holy Grail of “how to” shape sound tutorials. Dude, if I can cal you like this😅, you are the most clear, informative teacher I've heard on YT. THANK YOU for sharing your knowledge.
4:26 one thing to note about the phase shift comment... you're using a 24db per octave slope on your highpass! This creates two points of 180° phase shift! One of those points occurs ABOVE the cutoff, so that filter is actually rearranging the phase quite a bit! Not that it matters. The phase relationship of a bass sound is not as predictable as "phase shift bad". Phase shift is bad, but ONLY if the phase has been carefully tuned to maximize headroom previously. Phase shift is also bad if you saturate your bass before you use the filter. It's simple enough to find a good phase relationship between your bass fundamental and its overtones. Just buss the synths, just tweak the phase of the sub, while inspecting the waveform through an oscilloscope, until the peaks are minimized. The reason it's a good idea to separate sub-bass instruments SPECIFICALLY is because when the notes combine, they can cause really long cancellations. Its the same phenomenon as dissonant notes creating "beating", except low frequencies' beating sounds way more noticeable.
Being an expert is one, but true mastery is shown in the way someone is willing to, and being capable of transferring knowledge in a way learners are able to follow throughout the process. Coffee ☕️ it is! Thanks 🙏🏻
20:02 quick correction. Sample rate reduction doesn't cause any ringing! When you just reduce the sample rate to introduce aliasing (which is those higher, metallic tones), it doesn't have any effect on the timing or length of the tones. It simply shifts the higher frequencies (already present in the signal) around the spectrum, similarly to frequency shifters. Still a good tip to use the transient shaper & gate on the aliased harmonics. It sounds unnatural for these high frequencies to sustain so long, because in nature, high frequencies decay faster. So this technique reintroduces some natural sound.
Such a great way of explaining ! Easily the best source of knowledge on this platform. Would love to see a video on stereo width in piano house/tech the panning and where certain instruments belong in the mix.
Regarding panning, I just don't tbh. It's a personal choice but for anything essential to the groove I don't pan for the reason that I don't want people on one side of the club getting a different thing to those on the other. If I have lots of backing vocal layers I usually pan those across the spectrum. For the rest I usually just let stereo things be stereo and that's where the track gets its width from. As for where stuff "belongs" , that's up to you, Do what feels good to you! There's no rules in art (although most might tell you to keep the kick and bass down the middle haha)
I thought I had everything under control, but the low end still felt a bit of a mystery at times. The scientific explanation in this video made everything super clear. And it is really obvious when you think about it. The STFU tool also made it much better as I used to sidechain everything to the same control. Thank you, now my low end is groovy! :D
I was going through this one more time and I can't stress enough how well the content is structured and how you build up from the bass fundamentals (literally) to the stereo field. There are subtle and simple notes (e.g. chorus is practically a delay or distortion energy distribution) that add up to the huge difference in comparison to other similar content out there. Again, happy new year! I am personally looking forward to your future recordings.
19:07 to clarify: distortion ITSELF does not destroy phase relationships. When the plugins have their own mix knob, they just blend in the regular dry signal. However, if a plugin has OVERSAMPLING, then that's what destroys phase relationships. The plugins blend the parallel signal before the downsampling step, which is the part that causes phase shift. If your distortion plugin avoids oversampling, it will be OK to use for parallel distortion. It will produce exactly zero unintended consequences. Most plugins let you have your cake and eat it too, though. Mix knobs that work with oversampling are fairly common in well-built plugins. Interesting, distortion itself actually changes no existing phase relationships. It adds new harmonics, whose phase relationships are perfectly tuned to decrease peak levels. Distortion is the best louder-maker tool available, even in parallel!
Yes. But even with no oversampling many processors use eqs / crossovers and other tools pre/post to shape the distortion behavior, and not always in a clean pre/post emphasis relationship. For those new to this I just find it easier to tell them to steer clear unless the drive itself has a mix parameter (although I've heard of few of those get it wrong too) because they won't have the ears to spot the comb filtering. Thanks for the clarifications though 👊
You are literally the BEST. From the format, to the content, and the way you articulate it all; beautifully done good sir. I would go to say you may be the GOAT in 2023. With 14 years of producing experience, I am finding your tutorials super informative and helpful. Thank you brotha
hey man i just want you to know. you're giving insane advice and for free. plus its so simple to understand. you dont get enough credit, THANK YOU!!! KEEP MAKING TUTORIALS
A Free widening plugin with a Freq cut off for mid/side, is Wider 2 (polyverse). I've metered it with Span mid/side set up, and it definitely is doing what it says on the tin (albeit with a fairly relaxed slope...)
Hey B! Regarding stereo imaging of bass, I have a (probably) noobie question. Let's say you have a bass top layer that is pretty wide and sounds great in stereo, but sounds weak in mono. However, upon checking for phase issues, you find there there are none at all. What would be your solution in a situation like this? A) Use a mid-EQ to boost centre frequencies (this makes it a little muddier!) B) Use an imager to simply reduce stereo (but this will come at the cost of making it sound less nice when playing in stereo) C) Its a top layer bass (with barely any frequencies below 100Hz) - there are definitely no phase issues! If there are no phase issues, then it shouldn't sound "weaker" in mono - you're overthinking! Little MCQ for ya! Many thanks from Canada 🍻
@@Bthelick The bass in question is a Serum bass roll/pluck with a soft HPF (Ableton EQ8) at 147Hz (so not too many low and likely phase-cancelling frequencies). It is a pretty wide sound, generally speaking. What I did to check for phase issues is solo only the bass roll + my sub, pan one all the way to the left, and pan the other all the way to the right, then observe SPAN's correlometer. It hovers at around negative 0.20 to positive 0.10 when I do this. This indicates no phase issues right? My method could be wrong - you know best! I also repeated this for my kicks, toms, and any other instruments that produce low frequencies (and compared them to my bass rolls). Same results - more or less hover around 0 in the correlometer. The only thing I can think of that may be causing phase issues is the Serum sound (bass roll) itself, since I have a lot of delay and reverb on this sound. But I can't pan/solo Serum's reverb effect or delay effect to test it this way. Here, I rely on keeping the bass roll as is (no panning), and observing SPAN's correlometer - it hovers at around 0.50 to 1.00. Is this indicative of phase issues? In your opinion, what is the best way to look for phase issues? Am I doing it wrong? Thanks again!
A little bit of compression can help too. But I agree that soundesign + tone shaping using effects, stereo effects are the more important part of anything music related actually
Sure, for a live bass guitar player, but what is there to compress in edm? Most bases produced by a synth don't have any dynamics to compress at all. I haven't needed to compress a bass (or drums) for over half a decade now. I find most who think the compression is helping are usually just getting fooled by the fact it's simply been made louder by the make up gain.
I’ll never forget the time I played my new track to a massive crowd in front of my peers and there was no synth on the drop, just kick and bass 😅 Trust the video, ALWAYS check in mono!
I’ve been loving watching your videos. Your commentary makes them so valuable! Super impressive how you clearly explain what and why you’re doing things. To clarify your comment about distortions and phase, I’m guessing you’re only talking about distortions that apply some type of eq/filtering under the hood? Simple distortion processes like soft/hard clipping or any sort of waveshaping shouldn’t affect phase whatsoever, yes? Distortions that don’t apply colouring via filtering should be A-ok to mix in parallel, I believe.
Clippers are usually fine yeah. Regarding distortion there are just too many cases, usually more bad than not to blanket recommend trying it that's all. It's just a rule of thumb to save beginners from getting into trouble, there will always be exceptions. 👊
I rarely comment on the videos man, but this is pure art. One of the best music production videos I have ever seen. Would love to see you do a track in style of Terminal Underground. Keep up the good work
It's downward slope ONLY if you set span slope to 0, Span and most EQs have +4.5 slope by default so noise is straight line. Downward slope is "old" way of displaying spectrum and most youngsters use only default settings.
Voxengo sound delay is really good for stereo manipulation. I have been using it for many many years to add a we bit of stereo offset to higher frequencies. It can require more filtering to keep Bass clean but i find it works well instead of stereo touch many times.
Are you saying you add it back to the dry signal? Because Sound delay just delays the signal in time. Stereo touch is just a delay too, but added back to signal and phase inverted per ear. So sound delay does exactly the same thing , minus the wet dry mix, phase and filler options.
@@Bthelick I just enjoy the "hands on" options of sound delay. It's a handy tool for many things and does one thing very accurately. On a send or duplicate track it's very handy to add some stereo information to whatever a person may wish to along with an EQ etc. Just figured I'd mention it when I saw you using stereo touch. Good videos.
@@Bthelick oh yeah but using sound delay on only one channel or on only the mid or side channel was the way I meant. It's the only way I use it so I guess I didn't mention that. The channel routing and controls are changeable in a menu.
who are you and where did you come from? your knowledge is astonishing. this will for sure be one of my favs music production channels. question: did you program the bpb saturator plugin to automatically reduce the output or does the plugin do it by itself? if you did it, how?
Thankyou. Yes I used the rack system in Ableton to assign both parameters to 1 macro knob (with opposite value ranges) You can do similar in logic, reaper, and FL studio too as far as I'm aware.
Love the tutorial. Would love a tutorial that explains more in depth phase issues, especially with bass and kick. You mention in this video about how LP filters can cause phase issues. Would love more explanation into that.
that STFU is also free, worth mentioning if you didnt, i did not hear you say it, if you did my apologies. this should sound a bit better than just using sidechain shouldnt it?
Thanks for pointing it out yes I try to mention they are free as that's a big part of the channel most of what I use is. (See waves video rant haha) It can sound 'better' in some scenarios depending on context. Because it is not a real side chain it has a different groove. if the kick uses a different rhythm then this won't follow so that can be bad. In a mix context it gives a little more control especially when treating sub elements. I still use both options as sometimes you want things to react to the kick and kick changes and sometimes you just want a consistent pumping effect.
Amazing video as always! For me Voxengo Span displayed completely wrong frequencies for the spikes. Was so confused but switched to ableton's spectrum analyzer plugin and got it working. 😀
Hey B. Might be a noobie question, but what constitutes a bass going too wide? Let's say my bass (not my sub - would never touch that) has been widened by ping-pong delay, chorus, and stereo touch (Voxengo). If my bass sounds much better/more interesting and wider in stereo than in mono (there is a significant difference), but I have made sure there is no phasing (sound doesn't fall apart or get quieter when I switch to mono - and just barely dips below zero on goniometer correlation metre), does that mean that I have upset the stereo-mono balance and should reduce width? Or, would you say that if there are no phasing issues and if the correlation meter never dips below zero, then the sound shouldn't sound too different in mono vs stereo to begin with? Thanks! - Sam
Yeah you got it, it's all about how it sounds to your ears, if it sounds solid in mono and the balance isn't upset (in relation to how important the sound is) then have at it! 👊
Maybe you could boost the music a bit in the "listening" section, so i wont have to turn up the volume to listen, and then get my ears blasted by your crispy delicious voice
Sorry yeah it's always a tough balance. I have it set so It does boost when I stop talking but it can't adjust for subtle sounds. If you're talking about those sub only sections that's a sign your listening environment might need some improvement, the levels to my ears are mostly equal.
I would like to add one interesting detail. Before you can navigate the pink noise on the spectrum analyzer, it must be properly configured. The analyzers have a Slope parameter that allows you to rotate the spectrum. And it must be adjusted so that pink noise shows a flat horizontal line. This is due to the fact that in pink noise all frequencies with the same time fall into our "zone of attention". And by adjusting the analyzer in such a way that the noise is horizontal, we make the analyzer work as our "zone of attention". What will be the correct display of the operation of frequencies. That is, we will see them as they are read by our perception. Meld's analyzer works like this by default, by the way. After such manipulations, you can already turn the noise itself, balancing between high and low frequencies to our taste using the Tilt filter in any good equalizer, be it Pro Q or Kirchoff. And as always. Great video!
Thank you! I thought white noise was supposed to measure flat? I have the slope on my Span set to 0 for that. Well that and to be it always looked more like what I was hearing.
@@Bthelick It's quite interesting that you use white noise. For my taste, it sounds quite aggressive in the upper frequencies. And pink is very close to all sounds in nature. It is enough to go outside in this wonderful summer and listen to how the leaves rustle with the wind, and you will find that everything is suitable for pink noise. In general, this gives a more matte sound. But in your case, a very good technique would be to raise the upper frequencies on pink noise, which will sound the most pleasant.
@@young_neal5947 I agree, that's why I used it, pink is much closer to a natural distribution. I meant using white noise to calibrate a meter only. Because that resulting slope on sound is how I perceive it irl , in a good room with flat calibrated subs I perceive more bass at equal level naturally, probably because bass vibrates the body too.
@@Bthelick I got you. This is a detail I didn't know. In any case, I'm very glad that I found your channel and have already watched a lot of stuff you've made. It's nice when everyone understands.
I love your videos a lot… I really appreciate you sharing this with all of us…. One thing I didn't catch, if you can? How is the EQ set on the SUB Bass track? Are you using a cut off to go from 42-82hz…. I didn’t catch that part and am unsure? If you have a second to lmk that would be great! Keep up the videos they are awesome!
Excellent tutorial as always, 10/10! Simple question, if you have a saw wave bassline, for sub would you EQ the bottom end or any advantage in using a specific sine wave 'sub' patch?
Eq on the low end of bass usually only works if the bass is only playing 1 note. Otherwise when the bass part changes note the eq will be in the wrong place. Then you just end up with uneven bass frequencies with some notes being louder than others. The sub gives you proper control of both sidechain/envelope and lets you keep a solid bass end by being even across different notes.
@@Bthelick Ah I see, I watched again and see now 'sub-separation' is a separate sine wave track, not splitting the same bass into 2 parts with EQ. Thanks for clarification, much appreciated!
I forgot to mention if you have a stereo bass that collapses badly to mono, remaking into stereo with any of these methods still doesn't improve the mono, instead you can use a utility plugin to playback only the left or right side as the middle instead of the mono sum , that is a usually a big improvement, and then you can re-stereo it
I also totally forgot Steve Duda (Xfer) made a free dimension expander plugin, I had already figured it out by that point and have just been in the habit of using a delay to do it. You can just go grab that instead. At least you know how it works now though!
@@Bthelick I LOVE YOUR CHANNEL. the sub track, in this case.. in wich frecuency do you cut? Between 41Hz and 82Hz with LOW Pass filter? Or on the same Frecuency that you cut on the track of the Bass (62Hz)?
@EspiriG there's no need, because it's just a simple sine wave, so no frequencies are present above the fundamental anyway
@@Bthelick i really love you
I watched probably 100 hours of music production tutorials on UA-cam. I normally don"t write comments, but this just hits different! Thanks for sharing your hard earned knowledge, with the people.
I second that, lol
@@TheChronoProductions I'll make that 3. Bthelick is a hidden gem. Shhhhh!
true true! That's the kind of tutorials we all wanted
I would happily pay for proper tuition
THE GOAT OF MUSIC PRODUCTION TUTORIALS
I absolutely agree!
*Important: please bare in mind when I say things like "parallel distortion is not going to work", My advice is largely intended for beginners and these are initial guidelines that will help you (or rather keep you 'out of trouble' ) in a majority of scenarios. I break these 'rules' all the time, because I know why , where , when and how through experience. Until you gather that same experience my advice always errs on the side of caution.
Most helpful instructional vid I've seen on youtube
Any chance you might do a video breaking down tracks like “1949” by Honey and Badger? Maybe explaining what elements of those tracks are beginner friendly vs not beginner friendly etc?
Hopefully that question makes sense in a way that is relevant to the purpose of your channel 😂
oops I shoulda read this before commenting. Great work!
@@ampersand64 haha no worries it's all good.
Your education is there for those that seek further clarification , thanks for your contribution. 👊
I just came back from Hard Summer 2024. While I think I have a pretty diverse taste in music, I’m mainly a Hip-Hop/Rap head. Hearing so much House music in two days while dancing nonstop has literally made me realize how sick the House genre is.
Been producing, mixing, and mastering my own music for 4 years now and you were the first channel I came across when I looked up tutorials on House (cause at this point I’m addicted lol). I gotta say, I feel lucky AF to be listening to your years of knowledge and experience. I’m remixing all my old songs into house mixes and it’s about to be so much fun cause of you.
Thank you!
I’ve been watching tons of tutorials for the last 7 years, and man, let me tell you, you are the best so far. I wish I had learnt from you since the beginning. Keep going!
TRUE this, feel lucky to have your caliber explaining music to us
it feels like like im in the club, but im also learning how the beat is working too. Never have i wanted a dj set where the dj explains everything they're doing, this is great!
Been watching vids/producing for nearly a decade and can confirm tutorials like yours feel like they consolidated years…if only I had these back when I started. Newbies you don’t know how good you got it with this dude
Watched countless music production channels (and some are actually very good), but I now consider this one as the best. Straight to the point, simple and clear explanations, also very good tastes, no endless "hey guys thanks for blablabla" introduction or 1min VPN advert. PLUS you spend a moment to show your presets and sometimes share patches for free. Experience sharing and generosity at his best, HATS OFF for Bthelick.
Cannot agree more …
That "energy pool" analogy with the pink noise has to be THE BEST explanation I have ever heard... and I have studied audio production and engineering, attended many masterclasses (including several tutored by some of the world's biggest producers), and, of course, watched a three billion UA-cam videos on the subject, over the last 25 years. Fair play! First vid of yours I've ever seen, and you have a new subscriber 👌👌👌
You are my new favorite tutorial channel, damn you're knowledgable and smooth AF teaching, huge appreciation
I have the impression I have just discovered the Holy Grail of “how to” shape sound tutorials. Dude, if I can cal you like this😅, you are the most clear, informative teacher I've heard on YT. THANK YOU for sharing your knowledge.
4:26 one thing to note about the phase shift comment...
you're using a 24db per octave slope on your highpass!
This creates two points of 180° phase shift!
One of those points occurs ABOVE the cutoff, so that filter is actually rearranging the phase quite a bit!
Not that it matters. The phase relationship of a bass sound is not as predictable as "phase shift bad".
Phase shift is bad, but ONLY if the phase has been carefully tuned to maximize headroom previously.
Phase shift is also bad if you saturate your bass before you use the filter.
It's simple enough to find a good phase relationship between your bass fundamental and its overtones. Just buss the synths, just tweak the phase of the sub, while inspecting the waveform through an oscilloscope, until the peaks are minimized.
The reason it's a good idea to separate sub-bass instruments SPECIFICALLY is because when the notes combine, they can cause really long cancellations. Its the same phenomenon as dissonant notes creating "beating", except low frequencies' beating sounds way more noticeable.
Being an expert is one, but true mastery is shown in the way someone is willing to, and being capable of transferring knowledge in a way learners are able to follow throughout the process. Coffee ☕️ it is! Thanks 🙏🏻
I’ve been producing for a long time and I’ve gotta say your tutorials are the best I’ve come across. Good for beginners and experienced producers 🔥
I start making music when I was 16 and now I m 34. I didnt learn much on youtube but now I found your chanel. Very advanced advise I learn a lot thnx
20:02 quick correction. Sample rate reduction doesn't cause any ringing!
When you just reduce the sample rate to introduce aliasing (which is those higher, metallic tones), it doesn't have any effect on the timing or length of the tones. It simply shifts the higher frequencies (already present in the signal) around the spectrum, similarly to frequency shifters.
Still a good tip to use the transient shaper & gate on the aliased harmonics.
It sounds unnatural for these high frequencies to sustain so long, because in nature, high frequencies decay faster. So this technique reintroduces some natural sound.
Don't want to repeat what has been written here, but this video really is something else. Thanks
Such a great way of explaining ! Easily the best source of knowledge on this platform. Would love to see a video on stereo width in piano house/tech the panning and where certain instruments belong in the mix.
Regarding panning, I just don't tbh.
It's a personal choice but for anything essential to the groove I don't pan for the reason that I don't want people on one side of the club getting a different thing to those on the other.
If I have lots of backing vocal layers I usually pan those across the spectrum.
For the rest I usually just let stereo things be stereo and that's where the track gets its width from.
As for where stuff "belongs" , that's up to you, Do what feels good to you!
There's no rules in art (although most might tell you to keep the kick and bass down the middle haha)
I thought I had everything under control, but the low end still felt a bit of a mystery at times. The scientific explanation in this video made everything super clear. And it is really obvious when you think about it. The STFU tool also made it much better as I used to sidechain everything to the same control. Thank you, now my low end is groovy! :D
You have such a unique style what with the constant track playing in the background, really keeps me glued
Best tutorials I’ve found in hundreds upon hundreds of videos THANK YOU 🎉
I was going through this one more time and I can't stress enough how well the content is structured and how you build up from the bass fundamentals (literally) to the stereo field. There are subtle and simple notes (e.g. chorus is practically a delay or distortion energy distribution) that add up to the huge difference in comparison to other similar content out there. Again, happy new year! I am personally looking forward to your future recordings.
It’s like he’s taking the exact gaps in my knowledge and filling them in, expertly.
19:07 to clarify:
distortion ITSELF does not destroy phase relationships.
When the plugins have their own mix knob, they just blend in the regular dry signal.
However, if a plugin has OVERSAMPLING, then that's what destroys phase relationships.
The plugins blend the parallel signal before the downsampling step, which is the part that causes phase shift.
If your distortion plugin avoids oversampling, it will be OK to use for parallel distortion.
It will produce exactly zero unintended consequences.
Most plugins let you have your cake and eat it too, though. Mix knobs that work with oversampling are fairly common in well-built plugins.
Interesting, distortion itself actually changes no existing phase relationships. It adds new harmonics, whose phase relationships are perfectly tuned to decrease peak levels. Distortion is the best louder-maker tool available, even in parallel!
Yes. But even with no oversampling many processors use eqs / crossovers and other tools pre/post to shape the distortion behavior, and not always in a clean pre/post emphasis relationship.
For those new to this I just find it easier to tell them to steer clear unless the drive itself has a mix parameter (although I've heard of few of those get it wrong too) because they won't have the ears to spot the comb filtering.
Thanks for the clarifications though 👊
@@Bthelick yeah you're totally right. I was slightly being a smart-ass. Cheers
100% deserve the subs (pun intended) wicked tutorial, the best explanation of bass processing I've seen. Great detail
You are literally the BEST. From the format, to the content, and the way you articulate it all; beautifully done good sir. I would go to say you may be the GOAT in 2023. With 14 years of producing experience, I am finding your tutorials super informative and helpful. Thank you brotha
Discoveryng this channel its pobablyone of the best things that has ever happened to my music carreer
This is by far the best tutorials for music production
you're an amazing teacher, thank you for what you're doing for this community.
gem of a fucking channel!
Thanks!
I try to keep it more about music though 🤣🤟🙌
Hands down to the BEST music production tutorials channel 👏🔥
You really have a knack for teaching this stuff! Thank you!
hey man i just want you to know. you're giving insane advice and for free. plus its so simple to understand. you dont get enough credit, THANK YOU!!! KEEP MAKING TUTORIALS
learning so much here for free, really appreciate the work you are doing!
THE CLUB TOILET TEST LOL- I've often thought thats exactly how it sounds but I'm glad you named it.
Aka as the cloak room test!!!
harika bir ders lowend seslerim artık düzenli tşkler
A Free widening plugin with a Freq cut off for mid/side, is Wider 2 (polyverse). I've metered it with Span mid/side set up, and it definitely is doing what it says on the tin (albeit with a fairly relaxed slope...)
Yes I have it. I Still prefer the sound of voxengo's though.
@@Bthelick span is one of my fav plugins... I shall give it a go!
Do you do private sessions by any chance?
I don't , just no time I'm afraid.
That's a really tight groove! Love the samples/sounds...
“I hope you learned something” man I learned everything Damnn
Amazing tutorial! So many new techniques for me to try!
Just found your channel, so far every video I’ve seen is packed with tons of practical tips and tricks.
Subbed 🔥
This video is Incredible!! I truly love how you explain every bit of your process. Thank You Sir!
Hey B! Regarding stereo imaging of bass, I have a (probably) noobie question. Let's say you have a bass top layer that is pretty wide and sounds great in stereo, but sounds weak in mono. However, upon checking for phase issues, you find there there are none at all. What would be your solution in a situation like this?
A) Use a mid-EQ to boost centre frequencies (this makes it a little muddier!)
B) Use an imager to simply reduce stereo (but this will come at the cost of making it sound less nice when playing in stereo)
C) Its a top layer bass (with barely any frequencies below 100Hz) - there are definitely no phase issues! If there are no phase issues, then it shouldn't sound "weaker" in mono - you're overthinking!
Little MCQ for ya!
Many thanks from Canada
🍻
Hmmm, well first, how are you checking for phase issues?
@@Bthelick The bass in question is a Serum bass roll/pluck with a soft HPF (Ableton EQ8) at 147Hz (so not too many low and likely phase-cancelling frequencies). It is a pretty wide sound, generally speaking. What I did to check for phase issues is solo only the bass roll + my sub, pan one all the way to the left, and pan the other all the way to the right, then observe SPAN's correlometer. It hovers at around negative 0.20 to positive 0.10 when I do this. This indicates no phase issues right? My method could be wrong - you know best! I also repeated this for my kicks, toms, and any other instruments that produce low frequencies (and compared them to my bass rolls). Same results - more or less hover around 0 in the correlometer.
The only thing I can think of that may be causing phase issues is the Serum sound (bass roll) itself, since I have a lot of delay and reverb on this sound. But I can't pan/solo Serum's reverb effect or delay effect to test it this way. Here, I rely on keeping the bass roll as is (no panning), and observing SPAN's correlometer - it hovers at around 0.50 to 1.00. Is this indicative of phase issues?
In your opinion, what is the best way to look for phase issues? Am I doing it wrong? Thanks again!
I could listen to you all day long such a good tutorial
The most I've learned from a single tutorial! brb about to watch all your videos
clear-simple- and quality tutorial. thnx
thank you very much !!! so precious
thanks for sharing your knowledge, this is inspiring ;)
LOVE THIS GUY
Man i love your style of videos. Highly educational and entertaining.
A little bit of compression can help too. But I agree that soundesign + tone shaping using effects, stereo effects are the more important part of anything music related actually
Sure, for a live bass guitar player, but what is there to compress in edm? Most bases produced by a synth don't have any dynamics to compress at all. I haven't needed to compress a bass (or drums) for over half a decade now. I find most who think the compression is helping are usually just getting fooled by the fact it's simply been made louder by the make up gain.
Happy as balls I came across your channel 😻
Bthelick is a vibe…locked in my top 5 channels to lose sleep over 🖤😎🙌🍭
I’ll never forget the time I played my new track to a massive crowd in front of my peers and there was no synth on the drop, just kick and bass 😅
Trust the video, ALWAYS check in mono!
I’ve been loving watching your videos. Your commentary makes them so valuable! Super impressive how you clearly explain what and why you’re doing things.
To clarify your comment about distortions and phase, I’m guessing you’re only talking about distortions that apply some type of eq/filtering under the hood? Simple distortion processes like soft/hard clipping or any sort of waveshaping shouldn’t affect phase whatsoever, yes? Distortions that don’t apply colouring via filtering should be A-ok to mix in parallel, I believe.
Clippers are usually fine yeah. Regarding distortion there are just too many cases, usually more bad than not to blanket recommend trying it that's all. It's just a rule of thumb to save beginners from getting into trouble, there will always be exceptions. 👊
You easily make the best house tutorials on youtube. Thank you so so much!
Thank you so much for creating this, one of the best tutorials on UA-cam on this topic for sure! ❤ Subscribed!
best Music Education Videos Paid or free I've even Seen keep them coming!!!
This man will be the sole reason people think I’m a good producer
I rarely comment on the videos man, but this is pure art. One of the best music production videos I have ever seen. Would love to see you do a track in style of Terminal Underground. Keep up the good work
It's downward slope ONLY if you set span slope to 0, Span and most EQs have +4.5 slope by default so noise is straight line. Downward slope is "old" way of displaying spectrum and most youngsters use only default settings.
True good point, I always preferred 0 slope it looks more like what actually I'm hearing.
🙌🏾 appreciate you G!
What a great Tutorial... Thank you so much!
Voxengo sound delay is really good for stereo manipulation. I have been using it for many many years to add a we bit of stereo offset to higher frequencies. It can require more filtering to keep Bass clean but i find it works well instead of stereo touch many times.
Are you saying you add it back to the dry signal? Because Sound delay just delays the signal in time.
Stereo touch is just a delay too, but added back to signal and phase inverted per ear.
So sound delay does exactly the same thing , minus the wet dry mix, phase and filler options.
@@Bthelick I just enjoy the "hands on" options of sound delay. It's a handy tool for many things and does one thing very accurately. On a send or duplicate track it's very handy to add some stereo information to whatever a person may wish to along with an EQ etc. Just figured I'd mention it when I saw you using stereo touch. Good videos.
@@Bthelick oh yeah but using sound delay on only one channel or on only the mid or side channel was the way I meant. It's the only way I use it so I guess I didn't mention that.
The channel routing and controls are changeable in a menu.
@@ahdziz666 ah right yeah. Stereo touch is just sound delay on the side channel basically.
Fantastic content as always. Love the channel mate.
can we have a turtorial about house beat programming, I really love your teaching style
who are you and where did you come from? your knowledge is astonishing. this will for sure be one of my favs music production channels. question: did you program the bpb saturator plugin to automatically reduce the output or does the plugin do it by itself? if you did it, how?
Thankyou.
Yes I used the rack system in Ableton to assign both parameters to 1 macro knob (with opposite value ranges)
You can do similar in logic, reaper, and FL studio too as far as I'm aware.
Thank you
Love the tutorial. Would love a tutorial that explains more in depth phase issues, especially with bass and kick. You mention in this video about how LP filters can cause phase issues. Would love more explanation into that.
I don't need to make one Dan Worral has covered that in depth check out his tutorial.
Another great video with proper explanation. Love your work 💯
I love you man thankyou so much this is amazing so underrated
Thank you!!
Honestly man you are great - what an awesome tutorial!
Thanks for that!
that STFU is also free, worth mentioning if you didnt, i did not hear you say it, if you did my apologies. this should sound a bit better than just using sidechain shouldnt it?
Thanks for pointing it out yes I try to mention they are free as that's a big part of the channel most of what I use is. (See waves video rant haha)
It can sound 'better' in some scenarios depending on context. Because it is not a real side chain it has a different groove. if the kick uses a different rhythm then this won't follow so that can be bad. In a mix context it gives a little more control especially when treating sub elements. I still use both options as sometimes you want things to react to the kick and kick changes and sometimes you just want a consistent pumping effect.
Best tutorials online today!
Thanks again!
Really cruicial info, great video!
Amazing video as always! For me Voxengo Span displayed completely wrong frequencies for the spikes. Was so confused but switched to ableton's spectrum analyzer plugin and got it working. 😀
Wrong??? I've never known it to be wrong. Hard to read maybe.
I don't use default settings though. I have it set to max RT and a zero slope
This is straight gold! 🔥
waoo that is a great video!! thankz fr share your knowledge with us
Thanks for the video! Glad I found ZEEK STFU and Wolf Shape plugins. Everything else is really worth watching too
Amazing content as usual!
Saludos desde México 🇲🇽❤️
Welcome cassette 👊❤️
woow great vids man really good thanks
Brilliant !
Absolutely the best!!! ❤
Hey B. Might be a noobie question, but what constitutes a bass going too wide? Let's say my bass (not my sub - would never touch that) has been widened by ping-pong delay, chorus, and stereo touch (Voxengo). If my bass sounds much better/more interesting and wider in stereo than in mono (there is a significant difference), but I have made sure there is no phasing (sound doesn't fall apart or get quieter when I switch to mono - and just barely dips below zero on goniometer correlation metre), does that mean that I have upset the stereo-mono balance and should reduce width? Or, would you say that if there are no phasing issues and if the correlation meter never dips below zero, then the sound shouldn't sound too different in mono vs stereo to begin with? Thanks! - Sam
Yeah you got it, it's all about how it sounds to your ears, if it sounds solid in mono and the balance isn't upset (in relation to how important the sound is) then have at it! 👊
@@Bthelick Makes sense. Wonderful 😎
hell yes love these vids
I love these videos! Learning so much
Amazing tutorial. Great stuff here.
Maybe you could boost the music a bit in the "listening" section, so i wont have to turn up the volume to listen, and then get my ears blasted by your crispy delicious voice
Sorry yeah it's always a tough balance. I have it set so It does boost when I stop talking but it can't adjust for subtle sounds.
If you're talking about those sub only sections that's a sign your listening environment might need some improvement, the levels to my ears are mostly equal.
love this channel
I would like to add one interesting detail. Before you can navigate the pink noise on the spectrum analyzer, it must be properly configured. The analyzers have a Slope parameter that allows you to rotate the spectrum. And it must be adjusted so that pink noise shows a flat horizontal line. This is due to the fact that in pink noise all frequencies with the same time fall into our "zone of attention". And by adjusting the analyzer in such a way that the noise is horizontal, we make the analyzer work as our "zone of attention". What will be the correct display of the operation of frequencies. That is, we will see them as they are read by our perception. Meld's analyzer works like this by default, by the way. After such manipulations, you can already turn the noise itself, balancing between high and low frequencies to our taste using the Tilt filter in any good equalizer, be it Pro Q or Kirchoff.
And as always. Great video!
Thank you! I thought white noise was supposed to measure flat?
I have the slope on my Span set to 0 for that. Well that and to be it always looked more like what I was hearing.
@@Bthelick It's quite interesting that you use white noise. For my taste, it sounds quite aggressive in the upper frequencies. And pink is very close to all sounds in nature. It is enough to go outside in this wonderful summer and listen to how the leaves rustle with the wind, and you will find that everything is suitable for pink noise. In general, this gives a more matte sound. But in your case, a very good technique would be to raise the upper frequencies on pink noise, which will sound the most pleasant.
@@young_neal5947 I agree, that's why I used it, pink is much closer to a natural distribution. I meant using white noise to calibrate a meter only. Because that resulting slope on sound is how I perceive it irl , in a good room with flat calibrated subs I perceive more bass at equal level naturally, probably because bass vibrates the body too.
@@Bthelick I got you. This is a detail I didn't know. In any case, I'm very glad that I found your channel and have already watched a lot of stuff you've made. It's nice when everyone understands.
Another vid, another gem
I love your videos a lot… I really appreciate you sharing this with all of us…. One thing I didn't catch, if you can? How is the EQ set on the SUB Bass track? Are you using a cut off to go from 42-82hz…. I didn’t catch that part and am unsure? If you have a second to lmk that would be great! Keep up the videos they are awesome!
There's no need for a sub eq, if the sub is a sine wave then it's a pure single tone, there's nothing to filter off
Great one for breakfast this day for me ;-) Thanks
This is really good stuff!
Thumb up, man.
Excellent tutorial as always, 10/10! Simple question, if you have a saw wave bassline, for sub would you EQ the bottom end or any advantage in using a specific sine wave 'sub' patch?
Eq on the low end of bass usually only works if the bass is only playing 1 note. Otherwise when the bass part changes note the eq will be in the wrong place. Then you just end up with uneven bass frequencies with some notes being louder than others.
The sub gives you proper control of both sidechain/envelope and lets you keep a solid bass end by being even across different notes.
@@Bthelick Ah I see, I watched again and see now 'sub-separation' is a separate sine wave track, not splitting the same bass into 2 parts with EQ. Thanks for clarification, much appreciated!