@@wolverineiscool7161 Well, in the pictures they look identical and they died fighting together. Seems twin-y. Technically not proof but I don't see why it was written that way if they weren't.
Voldemort: Knock Knock James: Who’s there? Voldemort: You Know James: You Know who? Voldemort: Exactly. James: Aw, Dang! Edit: HOW DID THIS GET SO MANY LIKES WHAT-
That fight between Fabian, Gidion and the five death eaters would have been incredible. Molly's older brothers must have been very very gifted wizards.
“Physical possession of the sword is not guaranteed ownership, as the sword can magically disappear and reappear at any merit it chooses. In Deathly Hallows, Griphook steals the sword from Harry after helping break into Gringotts, but the sword vanishes from his possession as he is not a true gryffindor.” So even if Voldemort got the sword, it might disappear before he could turn it into a horcrux because he’s not a true gryffindor.
We know Snape, a Slytherin, took the sword from behind the painting in the Headmaster's office and placed it in the bottom of the frozen pond in Deathly Hallows. So it's possible for a non-Gryffindor to take it, transport it, etc. without it disappearing. Apparently, the sword just does whatever it (or JK Rowling) wants to do.
@@c.w.9501 Sir, true Gryffindor does not necessarily mean that you should be in Gryffindor house. It means that you should have the qualities of a worthy Gryffindor to own or use the sword.
Making the sword a horcrux just seems like a bad idea The symbolism aside, Voldemort wants horcruxes that can be used to restore him to life. Putting one in an object that might simply vanish into the hands of the enemy at any moment is a big, unnecessary risk.
@@fabianbinder3681 wouldn't it be absorbed? Like last time? "The sword absorbs what makes it stronger" So... I guess if it actually became a horcrux it would be indestructible.
M S I think it would simply absorb the power of that piece of Voldemort’s soul for whatever power it’s worth. So its impossible to make a horcrux out of as the piece of his soul couldn’t attach itself to the sword without being absorbed.
Voldemort would know the swords abilities so he wouldn't risk putting a part of his soul in it. Also goblin magic wouldn't be compatible with his. But the indestructible sword theory is interesting.
There were so many discrepancies in the books and movies it could be a book in and of itself. I think that Wormtail was so intimidated by Voldemort's considerable power that he probably felt he had no choice. He didn't want to die. So, he became what we saw in the books.
Yeah i mean he died in the malfoy manor when he hesitated to hurt harry... the silver hand voldemort gave him strangled him to death at the slightest sign of mercy..
ICE97 _98 less mercy and more cowardice or Betral depending how you look at it, it’s like what Sirius said Peter seeks out the strongest , at school this was Sirius and James, and during the war the order but as we all know he turns coat and gets an unknown number of people killed, now at the end of his life ( unknowingly) he senses Harry is going to turn the tide on Tom riddle , so he decided to help Harry most likely in an attempt to gain favour
@@ann._.002 wormtail didnt intend to show mercy to harry, its stated that a magical bond is created when a wizard saves the life of another wizard. harry saved wormtails life when he defended him from lupin and black. wormtail was chocking harry when harry reminds him, which causes wormtail to let go. since it was important to mention this bond in the book, id say that means he didnt choose to let go but was instead compelled to return the favor
13:06 no, the sword of Gryffindor did not just “appear “ in the lake. Snape put it there on dumbledore’s orders Edit: also, the sword of Gryffindor was bewhiched to appear in the sorting hat for a worthy Gryffindor
Given how the sword presents itself to worthy Gryffindors under situations of great valor and the Sorting Hat stays at the school in the Headmaster's office, I very much doubt that many others besides Harry and Neville could have gotten the sword out of the hat because there would be so few opportunities to have a situation requiring valor while also happening to be in the same room as the hat. The hat is a good way to call the sword if you need it because the hat belonged to Gryffindor too, but that doesn't mean that it has to or even usually does present itself that way.
The idea of the sword presenting itself to Fabian & Gideon right before they get killed by Death Eaters is kind of funny to me. Because it means that the sword just randomly shows up, even when it can't really do anything useful. Like what if a worthy Gryffindor is drowning in an ocean while trying to rescue someone else and then the sword just appears out of the sky and bonks them on the head
Would the sword be useful in a wizard fight? Dun bring a sword to a wand fight, am I right? 😆 I think Godric had intended it to be used for a sword duel which may have been common in his time? 🤔 At least the man himself was a fan of 'em.
@@Broockle To be fair, the sword is made by goblins. Likely, it could completely deflect spells, as goblin metal only takes on that which makes it stronger.
Something I just thought of while re-watching this video: What if the seemingly insignificant deaths were in fact emotionally significant to Voldemort? Considering his mother used a love potion to coerce Tom Sr. into a sexual relationship, it's not inconceivable that Tom Jr. would think of his mother as a "tramp" who loved a muggle. Therefore, his murder of a "muggle tramp" could have been symbolic in his mind for killing his mother. Maybe each of the other Horcrux deaths are equally symbolic in some way?
I wouldn't say that the horcrux selection implies any sort of sympathy, the sheer nature and purpose of the spell denies that as a possibility. But many psychopathic killers chose there victims for a reason, often an emotional one - even more so when they have an important goal in mind. No sympathy required, nor did I intend to suggest there was. :)
Don't forget the irony that Voldemort intended to make his final horcrux in Gryffndor's hometown, but that Harry ended up destroying the first horcrux in Slytherin's secret chamber.
@TAD maybe he knew the sword was a fake, voldy is a very powerful wizard clearly. He ordered it to be put in the vault anyway because he knew that there was a chance harry and his friends would come looking for it? and there are only a few things more dangerous than trying to rob a gringotts vault and he counted on harry to get killed or get caught.
@@wolverineiscool7161 He had already made nagini his 6th horcrux (it was in fact 7th because harry was one but voldemort never knew) Also voldemort was shocked to his core when he found out about the cup, he couldn't have suspected anything
There are Asian cultures in which the three fingers he used (thumb plus index plus middle) means 7. thumb plus index is six. maybe he's from Singapore?
Interesting thought... If ordinary enough, then when it should get broken would it cause questions, because it did not break (shatter, dent,etc)? Good idea especially if just tossed and goes to a landfill, because then it would get lost and no one would be the wiser. It seemed to me that he wanted to protect them and therein was the problem. The protection alone or keeping secret automatically draws people to want to find. If that were to happen, then would that mean that evil wins and the good would lose. A good example is a hollowed out book with your valuables out in the open versus of safe on/in the wall. The safe states if you had valuables it would be there, and if not you have none for the taking. I like this thought process for being the winner. Now, if this were true, then would anyone be able to find the item(s) in time to destroy in order for Voldemort to die and the current evil with him? My guess is Harry would have died a second death, then all the world would be under Voldemort's rule.
I guess they‘re very powerful and therefore easy to track down by good wizards like Dumbledore because they can feel the power. So it wouldn‘t help to take the easiest items and just dig them into the earth but, like voldemort did, secure them in different dangerous places surronded by traps etc.
It probably went more like: Voldy: Trick or treat! James: Here is your candy kid... wait... you are not a kid Voldy: no im not a kid, but you are dead, also i choose trick, Avada Kedavra Lily: WHY DID YOU DO THIS YOU MONSTER? Voldy: he gave me the worst candy that exists in the store next door, seriously, very rude, anyways DIE!
Alternate theory: We don’t actually know a bunch about how horcruxes are made, but we do know that it is a very significant magical event, which requires a powerful wizard, what if it also requires magically significant days? The Harry Potter series shows constantly that halloween is magically significant, at least to Harry, and in real world “magic lore” halloween is significant. It could be that Halloween was the closest convenient and magically significant day under which horcruxes could be made. If we go by real world “lore” the fall solstice would happen first, but it could be too close to when Voldemort received the information to matter, being only a month and a half, given that it’s possible to ritual to create horcruxes requires very specific ingredients, which is why Slughorn might know about it, being a potions master.
@@ryanward5770 not really.. the books say that the victims of voldemorts horcux making were unharmed, no signs of anything, just like all the others killed by avada kedavra.. so i guess one would have seen if voldy took a bite.. but there were no traces at all.. so no that is certainly not how a horcurx is made..
Also there is a theory that Rowling kind of alluded to. Its that Horcruxes are made by killing the person then proceeding to comit cannibalism as part of the ritual. This may have been a way to objectify them so then the soul would grab onto an object. And as the Potters’s bodies were found intact that may have been why his soul latched onto Harry
This would explain why he used a vagrant for one and a peasant for another, because if he was on a time crunch and couldn't find a suitable sacrifice... but he had to do it on _that_ day. Makes sense.
Fancy Jammie K he is SUCH a drama queen! All his symbols and beliefs and the way he makes Hagrid carry harry back after he believes he's dead yay he's a guy who loves the limelight!
So. Order members seemed to drop like flies in the lead up to Lily and James being murdered, and Harry survived. Was Pettigrew responsible for all of the other deaths, if he was funneling info for a year? I suspect so.
Not necessarily. The other order members weren't in hiding, I guess they sometimes launched some sort of an attack or were on a mission that went wrong and they ended up outnumbered.
here's a fan theory harrys mother's love didnt save him, the fact that voldmort tried to make a horcrux out of an item that couldnt be damaged did. a fragment of his soul wouldnt make the sword stronger so it would reject it
@@propheinx2250 wouldn't it be interesting to think the sword accidentally made the lightning scar? I know it didn't, but it's something to think about.
Watching this a year late... but maybe he: 1. Split his soul as he cast the killing curse 2.a. The curse rebounds off Lily’s love shield 2.b. The part of the soul that he attempted to put in the sword is rejected 3.a. The rebounding curse kills his physical body and that part of his soul 3.b. The rejected soul fragment can’t go into the sword or back into his dead body (if that is even an option) 4. His stranded soul fragment flees to Albania
Every single time you did the Dumbledore voice I kept envisioning the Mysterious Ticking Noise video. Very good Dumbledore voice and great theory as always.
I quite like this theory. While I doubt the sword would have simply allowed Voldemort to hold onto it instead of just disappearing, Voldemort may have had some spell to counteract this effect. Other than that, I see next to no problems here, so good video! As for whether or not the sword would accept Voldemort's soul, Horrcruxes are nearly indestructible so I think the sword may very well have accepted it as that would make it stronger, had Voldemort gotten the chance to make the sword a Horrcrux of course. Also, I think Voldemort chose the sword for an extra reason. The sword is a powerful weapon and only presents itself to worthy Gryffindors. Imagine if some Gryffindor hero, the last one resisting Voldemort's regime, was fighting bravely in a battle and was able to summon the sword. However, the sword immediately turns on the hero, because it is possessed and controlled by a piece of Voldemort's soul. Such an insidious weapon would be a perfect way for Voldemort to combat his enemies, and if he could bend the enchantment to his will like how he can control other Horrcruxes, he could use it to track down all the most dangerous Griffindors. That's just wild speculation, but great video regardless! This comment wasn't all that long, but I suppose you can have a cookie anyway! See you around peeps!
If the sword only appears to worthy Gryffindors, I think it also has something that would make it reject being made into a horcrux. Or it might just be the destructive quality of the sword that would destroy Voldemort's soul and fail the horcrux spell.
The sword only supposedly appears to worthy Gryffindors because it was commissioned by Godric Gryffindor; it was, however, Goblin-made and people need to keep that it mind. It's not a sword of righteousness; it's just enchanted to appear for worthy Gryffindor's a.k.a. the brave, the bold, the chivalrous. The only limitation it has is that it only takes in that which makes it stronger, and as Horcruxes are incredibly difficult to destroy, it would have become a Horcrux had Riddle succeeded in killing Harry.
Maki Horcruxes are not specifically Slytherin related and a very dark field of Magic of the kinds that I don't think Godric would've had any reason to specifically counter act that with his enchantment. As for the destructive quality; it's not the sword but the basilisk venom which destroys the horcruxes. But I think that gives another question: Would have kiling the basilisk with the sword destroyed the horcrux in the sword itself and would the sword itself survive the killing of the contained horcrux? Would the sword not appear when the needing fights something that could destroy the swords horcrux?
Also Voldemort specifically chose October 31st for his attack because of Sahmain, a Celtic holiday, which both Halloween and Dia De Los Muertos are based on, that celebrates the belief that the veil between the living world and the dead one is at its thinnest, thus being the perfect date to end his journey for immortality.
It would have been really hard to destroy the sword of gryffindor because it absorbs what makes it stronger, as seen in the chamber of secrets where it absorbs the basilisks toxic blood or venom. This venom is able to destroy horcruxes as Hermione explains in Deathly hallows. So if you tried to destroy the sword of gryffindor with a basilisk's tooth, it would just have no effect at all because the sword would just absorb the venom as it has before in the chamber of secrets when Harry kills the basilisk. At least that's how I understand it and Hermione explained it in Deathly Hallows.
Would the soul even be absorbed by the sword? Mortality wouldn't really help make a sword stronger. Also if it was Horcrux'd, Harry killing the Basilisk would cause the Horcrux in the sword to be destroyed due to the Basilisk Venom.
@@johnlucas2838 good point but idk if it is possible to destroy the horcrux in an object without destroying the object itself. This could however work as you described when the sword absorbs the venom which destroys the horcrux within. However I do think that it would be possible to bind a piece of ones soul to the sword eventhough it only absorbs what makes it stronger, because as far as I'm concerned objects that become horcruxes don't exactly absorb the soulpiece but rather get bound to it.
So you're saying the bound enchantment of the Horcrux would be fighting against the absorbing enchantment of the sword. Because the way I see it would be they would come into conflict. The sword that was enchanted to take in that which made it stronger while the horcrux doesn't make the sword stronger. It would seem.... parasitic in a sense.
It’s my personal theory that Voldemort got the Gryffindor sword when he killed James Potter. The would sword appeared to James Potter, who in an act of courage, tried to save his family, but died to Voldemort.
It makes sense.. But fibian and gidian just sounds so much more ... romantic? Two brothers fighting five death eaters and potentialt Voldemort. Idk i always had a soft spot for twins. Btw we need an old order of the pheonix spinoff
I had this idea too, i think he tried to get it from Fabien and Gideon but it either didn't appear bc they were armed already; hence the sneak attack despite Voldemort being overwhelmingly powerful, or the sword appeared and vanished in the ensuing chaos. It makes sense though bc James was specifically unarmed and Voldemort killed him rather than use imperio to control him as he was a strong wizard himself and Voldemort says that he doesn't want to waste any magic blood.
I will rephrase my previous statement...when Tom was talking to Prof. Slughorn, he asked about dividing the soul into seven pieces, not make seven horcrux's. Does anyone else see this or agree that he only wanted 6 horcrux's...?
Nagini was only made a horcrux in Goblet of Fire. So Voldemort was 1 short of his goal when he went to kill baby Harry. He didn’t know Harry was made a horcrux, so unintentionally made one extra when he came back.
Yes. Voldy's original plan for Horcruxes is the diary, the ring, locket, cup, diadem, sword. Nagini was Plan B when he failed to kill Harry. And he did not know that Harry became a sort of Horcrux.
Rowling should have written a book series dedicated solely to the life of Voldemort beginning at his birth or even just his start at the orphanage and at least up until the events of The Philosopher's Stone. The people want more Voldemort. The only thing I consistently found myself wanting every time I read the books and watched the movies was more of Voldemort's story.
To add to this, what if the sword not only wouldn't take the soul piece but aided in Harry's protection by halting/redirecting the killing curse and deflected (intentionally or not) the piece of voldys soul into Harry making him the unintentional horcux, just think about it. Mind blown. If it wouldn't take the soul piece, the piece may have gone to the closest thing, Harry.
Though this theory is good I think I found the real reason voldemort took so long to kill the potters: Peter became the secret keeper and sent a massage to voldemort (maybe by owl?) who was pretty far away at the time getting the sword. He was like "oh shoot" and went wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh flying to the potters house. By the time he got there it had already been a few months.
Or Voldemort is a massive drama queen, considering he held his resurrection at the end of the Triwizard Tournament when he could have just had Barty Jr kidnap him while at Hogwarts, such as when he caught Harry, Krum, and Barty Senior on the edge of the Forbidden Forest. I get the feeling that self-propelled flight was something he perfected during OotP or HBP, since during the former he was keeping a low profile, and in the latter his actions in the present aren't even mentioned after the summer ends; and during the Battle of the Seven Potters, everyone in the Order reacts like Voldemort being able to fly without any aid is something he didn't have before.
I really like this theory, but my only gripe is that Voldemort probably wouldn't have wanted an object from Gryffindor that was known for teleporting. All of his other horcruxes were hidden away from the world, so I think he would find the sword rather unreliable - but then again, we are talking about the same guy who had access to the chamber of secrets, a chamber only he could enter and yet he choose the room of requirement to store the diadem, so his judgement might not be the best. Also, would it even have been possible to destroy the sword if it became a horcrux? The sword only takes in what will make it stronger and since it just absorbed the venom from the basilisk would one the fangs have been able to destroy it then? Maybe that would be why he would want to make it a horcrux then.
thomas jeppesen definitely bring up some great points. Although, Who knows how containing part of Voldemort’s soul would of affected the sword. It may have hindered how it would present itself. I completely agree though, that even if it didn’t affect its ability to appear and disappear, The fact that there would be almost nothing that could destroy it would outweigh that disadvantage to him. Then there’s also the fact that I don’t think he would’ve wanted pass up the opportunity of corrupting an item from every house.
I feel like stabbing it with the Basilisk fang would have actually killed the Horcrux... but not the sword itself. I may be wrong, but I think I heard somewhere that it's possible to kill a Horcrux without destroying the object itself, depending on its properties.
The sword only takes in that would make it stronger... I think that turning it into a horcrux would probably make it weaker ...so... A rejected rebound horcrux.... And that's why Harry became a horcrux cause the sword rejected a piece of his (voldmorts) soul
I like the idea of the sword "deflecting" the horcrux spell onto Harry. Also yeah, Voldy should have hidden the diadem in the chamber of secrets. Imagine the scene: *Ravenclaw student* No one's seen it for centuries (shows a picture) *Ginny* I've seen that! *Everyone* What? Where? *Ginny* In the chamber of Secrets *Harry* That makes sense actually, considering Voldy is the heir of Slytherin.... Ok let's get to it...
An excellent thought. My thought was either that or the sword conveniently disappeared (do to there not being any Griffindor's present) during the creation of the horcrux so the piece of soul latched onto harry. Rebound would make more sense as that would explain Tom Riddles death and turning harry into a horcrux.
This is why, when the lord of the rings was being filmed, Ian McKellen literally carried the books around like a BIBLE. This is why. Michael Gambon, you should've done the same thing.
On the other hand: If a horcrux is a constantly disappearing sword, that can only be found by very few people under the right circumstances, it's already pretty good hidden, isn't it?
Here's a thought. When Molly's brothers were attacked by the death eaters the sword likely came to them and the disappeared when they died. Guess Voldamort heard that this happened and knew it would be presented to James too if he was attacked. So he went to Godrics Hollow believing the sword would be there.
Snape was a Slytherin, yet the sword stayed in the headmasters office, and Snape could even put it in the lake where it waited for Ron and Harry. So the sword doesn't seem to disappear after the person who summoned no longer has it.
Wasn't the sorting hat also Gryffindor's? Isn't that why the hat and sword are linked? Why isn't anyone worried the that Voldemort would want the hat? The hat himself says that that Gryffindor made him when the founders were trying to decide how sorting would work. Which is honestly just a whole other weird relationship. Like all other kids in the world "I wish my dog could talk" and then Godric Gryffindor "I wish my clothes could talk".
Yep. In Goblet of Fire the Sorting had mentions it. "Twas Gryffindor who found the way He whipped me off his head. The founders put some brains in me So I could choose instead."
Everyone knows about the hat’s existence while i don’t think knowledge of the sword is as widely known. It’d be like... stealing abe lincoln’s stovepipe hat rather than his vampire killing ax.
But let’s be honest, firstly they wouldn’t even know it’s a hocrux unless they somehow do know and the sword is such an important historical artefact especially for gryfindoors that it would be quite upsetting to destroy plus the sword destroys hocroxes so the only way to destroy it is a basilisk fang but tbh not many people know about the chamber of secrets lol
Pippin's logic here ! "The closer to the danger we are, the safer we are ! Because they will not expect us !" (or something close to that :P) But basically: why would anybody suppose that he used something like that ? I still don't think that it was his goal since it seems a bit too random (since the sword can move at will and it's usually in Gryffindor, and not lost) and complicated to do, but I like the theory of him trying something that daring. He's Voldemort after all. He believed he could do anything, and nobody or nothing could resist him.
@Pius Emmanuel Wong Its ok, just letting you know. I used to read the books like a religion,when I was younger(I still have mine,plus the cursed child) so I was obsessed with the Killing Curse!
The easier thing to steal would be the sorting hat which used to belong to Godric Gryfindor and was then enchanted by each founder. This would also make it easier for Voldemort to find and identify potential future death eaters by the part of his soul influencing the hats decisions when sorting new students.
What about this secuence of events. Voldemort uses the spell to kill harry and separate his soul creating the final horrocrux with the sword, then the spell bounce and kills voldemort instead, but the rest of the spell is doing the same, creating the horrocrux with the sword, then the sword rejects voldemort soul and then the soul of voldemort goes to harry's body. It can explain better why harry ends up being an horrocrux, since the soul of voldemort was already trying to become one with the sword.
I thought of this as well. The sword probably rejected Voldemort's soul since that would mean the sword would need to be destroyed and the sword only takes in whatever makes it stronger. I think making the sword a horcrux would be a disadvantage to it.
But were the diadem and cup Goblin made? As it seems like everything that Wizards put value on (Muriel's Tiara, the Sword, Wizard money in general) is usually made by Goblins, which makes sense from a purely economic point of view as you want objects that are unique and can't just be conjured up by anyone with a wand. If so then the Diadem or cup would have also rejected the souls as well which we know they did not. Then again the thing that makes the Diadem and Cup valuable and unique aren't really their properties but the fact they were owned by famous sorcerers of the past so it's entirely possible that they are wizard made objects, they are also rumored to have powers but they are never really tested or displayed it would seem like something that would pop up after centuries that they are legendarily powerful objects just because the founders would be legend at this point and that the reality was less that they were exceptional wizards with powerful objects and that they were simply famous and that people that some of their power would have been rubbed off on the objects.
Dumbledore said that part of Voldemort's soul was ripped away from him and attached itself to the only LIVING thing in the Potter house. That was Harry. James did not have the sword or it would have been mentioned in the book. He didn't even have his wand. Voldemort watched through the window. He struck when he knew James had no defense and killed him right away then went after Harry but killed Lily because she wouldn't move away from Harry. Voldemort did not know he had left part of his soul behind in Harry. His body was already so damaged from the rebounding killing curse he couldn't feel his soul being torn again. Remember, voldemort was less t than human, less than anything after he got away from the Potter home. Because he was so weakened he never knew he'd made another horcrux.
He only had five when he killed Harry's parents, the sword was meant to be the sixth, he only decided to turn the snake into a horcruxe between the third and fourth books.
Nope. He literally uses the wording "to split the soul seven times". "Seven times" is NOT the same thing as "seven pieces", because you have to remember you're not counting from zero. You're counting from ONE, because the soul already exists. Each time you split the soul you are ADDING to the one that already existed. One plus seven is eight. He intended for seven horcruxes, plus the piece inside his body. SLUGHORN is the one who uses the wording "seven pieces". But he's not the one creating them. The person who actually created the horcruxes SPECIFICALLY says "split the soul seven times". Eight pieces. Not seven.
@@LordofFullmetal “Yes, sir,” said Riddle. “What I don’t understand, though - just out of curiosity - I mean, would one Horcrux be much use? Can you only split your soul once? Wouldn’t it be better, make you stronger, to have your soul in more pieces, I mean, for instance, isn’t seven the most powerfully magical number, wouldn’t seven - ?” I can't find him ever saying "to split the soul seven times." Though Slughorn does interrupt him mid sentence, so it could go either way. Unless what you are referring to is not the memory Slughorn gives to Harry.
His goal was definitely to have 6 horcruxes. He wanted to split his soul into 7, meaning have 7 pieces, just as splitting something in half makes 2 pieces, not 3. He didn't know Harry was a horcrux so he made Nagini his "sixth" horcrux when he came back to life in order to have his perfect 7 pieces.
@@rebeccaschwartz5477 If he wanted seven why would he go to the potters to make a 7th. And if you don't believe that theory why would he make nagini a horcrux later on believing it to be the 7th or even 8th horcrux
@SuperCarlinBrothers 1:54 The reason Voldemort needed specifik Harry Potters blood to resurect was to break Harrys mothers "love sacrifice spell". If Voldemort himself has Harrys blood (in the body), the spell cant hurt him (like when he died in first movie). So yes any blood could bring him back, but than Voldemort would still have a weakness to Harry. Voldemort plays for the long and winning game! Atlest thats my opinion!
no, voldemort had no reason at all to believe that using harry's blood would break lily's protection. it had the exact opposite effect. harry's blood inside voldemort is one of the biggest reasons voldemort died in deathly hallows.
Voldemort was seeking to split his soul 7x, rather than making 7 horcrux's. That is 6 pieces of his soul into 6 horcrux's, then the 7th piece resides within himself. Just my take.
He split off seven pieces, not split into seven pieces. 1 Diary, 2 Ring, 3 Pendant, 4 Tiara, 5 Cup, 6 Nagini, 7 Harry (meant for the sword) making a total of 8 pieces, counting the one he kept inside himself.
You are correct on what the Horcruxes were but Nagini was created after Harry. I think the OP was right and Voldy had the First 5 and was going to make the Sword the 6th making him have 7 parts including himself. Then instead of the Sword he got Harry but not knowing it when he returned he still thinks he needs 1 more to make 7 parts so he creates Nagini.
Also, Voldemort didn’t know that Harry was the horcrux untill like, Fourth year. All I know is that he made the snake a horcrux before finding out that harry is a horcrux.
@@Marina-by9zq I don't think Voldemort ever found out that Harry was a Horcrux because he would never have deliberately tried to destroy the vessel holding a piece of his soul if he had known about it.
Maybe it was Alice Longbottom who summoned the sword? I can imagine Bellatrix handing Voldy the sword. Maybe she was the only one who was entrusted to handle sword related business from then on.
He didn’t want to make seven Horcruxes - he wanted to split his soul into seven pieces. “Can you only split the soul once? For instance, seven...” “Merlin’s beard, Tom! Isn’t it bad enough to consider killing one person? To SPLIT THE SOUL into seven pieces...” As in, the part of the soul still inside him, and then the six pieces of soul in the Horcruxes.
An interesting question is how the heroes could have gone about destroying the sword if Voldemort had succeeded in making it a horcrux, and whether it would still have been able to destroy the other horcruxes.
If I remember correctly, it's mentioned in the book he would have seen Voldemort if it hadn't been for the dementors. In the book, Lupin stops him from meeting the Boggart because he fears this will happen (imagine the chaos that would ensue if the Boggart turned into Voldemort in front of the whole class).
I’m guessing maybe Voldemort looked for the sword for a while , but after a while he just said “well crap, I can’t find the sword. I guess I’ll just have to kill Harry and live with 6 horocruxes.” But then the sword appears to James as he tries to stop Voldemort and he says “oh hey! There’s the sword WHOOPIE!!!!!” (This comment was written for the funny dialogue which might not actually be funny).
What if Voldemort thought he had the sword, but it wasn’t the real sword? Remember when Bellatrix went crazy when she realized Harry and Hermione had the sword that was in her vault? That was a fake sword, a very well made copy, but not the original. Maybe that’s how she ended up with the sword in her vault to begin with. I might be wrong but I don’t remember there’s an actual explanation as to how she had the sword in her vault or is there one?
I always assumed that when Snape became Headmaster he commissioned the replica of the sword and gave it to Voldemort in place of the original, which he kept hidden since and not on display as it had been previously under Dumbledore. If I recall correctly, Lucius Malfoy would have seen the sword at the end of CoS, so the idea that Voldemort kept the fake since any moment prior wouldn't add up.
But what would’ve been the point of Snape giving the sword to Voldemort then? I don’t think Voldemort knew that the sword can be used to destroy the horcruxes.
It was explained in the books. Dumbledore told Snape to make a replica. Dumbledore knew Harry would need to original so it wouldn't do for something to happen to it. After Ginny, Neville, and I think Luna tried to steal it it was placed in Bellatrix's vault. The replica, that is. Bellatrix went crazy because Voldemort gave her Hufflepuff's cup to put in her vault, she didn't know what it was, of course, so naturally, the idea someone might have broken in and potentially taken the cup was enough to cause her to go spastic.
He used harrys blood for his resurrection to get his harrys love spell in his own blood. So he could be able to touch Harry. 1st film shows what happend when he tried touching Harry!
What if it is not the sword, but something else for Gryffindor? Or what if he chose a different powerful magical artifact? Lets not forget that one of his horcruxes was the stone of resurrection, one of the Deathly hallows. What if Peter Pettigrow told him about James's invisibility cloak? It would be an artifact "worthy" of becoming a horcrux according to Voldemort's standards. Godric's Hollow is the village where the Peverell brothers lived, those who get/made the Deahtly hallows. And he maybe didn't know that Dumbledore had the cloak at the time, so he went there to get the cloak and kill Harry to make the horcrux, but didn't succeed.
Alizée Denave no the ring that held the Stone was the Horcrux not the Stone itself. Voldemort didn't mind becoming the master of death because he was already immortal by making the Horcruxes and he probably got the wand only because he knew it was realy powerful. he didn't bother trying to get the Stone back either.
Lucas Vasconcelos I don't think he would be interested in the possibility the Deathly hollows have concerning immortality, but he would certainly value them as historical artifacts, just as he does with the objects of Hogwart's founders. Maybe you are right and the ring was the Horcrux, but he must have known about the Deathly hollows as I can't imagine him possessing such a powerful object without wanting to understand where it comes from and how it works. He wore the ring, that we know for sure as we see it in the memories, so he certainly realized what the stone could do even if he was not interested in talking to dead people. I am sure he must have been at least intrigued by the Deathly hollows at this point even if finding them was not a priority. If Peter Pettigrew told him about the invisibility cloak, I think he could have been interested in it and maybe seeing it as an opportunity to make a Horcrux. I truly don't think Gryffindor's sword would have stayed with Voldemort even a minute, so maybe the cloak was an alternative. It is still linked to Gryffindor in a way as the Peverell brothers lived in Gryffindor's village.
Voldemort didn't know about the deathly hallows. Having been raised in a muggle orphanage, he wouldn't have heard the Tale of the Three Brothers as a child. If he did hear the story later, & learn of the hallows, he probably would have brushed it off as pure fiction... the way most muggles think of Atlantis. The ring was significant to V because it had belonged to his grandfather, Marvolo, and was a Slytherin heirloom... and since V buried the ring in his grandfather's shack, he had no idea of the true power of the stone. He only sought the elder wand because there was historical evidence of a powerful wand that wins every duel. He only wanted THAT power after learning about the twin cores & seeking a way to overcome Harry's wand. Also, Dumbledore was the only one [among the heroes] who had made the connection between James' cloak & the hallows. If James knew it's history, he & D would likely have discussed the hallows with each other, so it's unlikely any of the Marauders (including Pettigrew) knew about them.
I did not think Peter would have told him about the cloak mentioning it is a Deathly hallow, but the description he could have given about it would certainly match. Even though Voldemort didn't grow up in a wizarding family, he could have heard about the deathly hallows later and realize their existence when he got the ring. He wore it so he must have realized its power. And he buried it to hide it, as he did with other horcruxes, but I don't think it means he didn't know about its origins. There is nothing in the books on what Voldemort knows or doesn't know on the Deathly Hallows. I do not think he would have been interested in them for their joint power of immortality, but he would have appreciate their historical value as a collector.
I believe that Alizée's point is simply that: The invisible Cloak is an important Potter (so kind of Gryffindor) heirloom and it's also in itself something really rare and powerful. It's a magical, rare and amazing items, it is in the possession of some of his worst enemies, and he believes their child *can* kill him. It's just so full of symbolism, he might have considered it. Also Pettigrew definitely knew about its existence since James used it with them. The only thing is, I don't think Voldemort would have talked about this kind of things with Pettigrew or anybody else. At least in details. I don't see him ask them about ideas for an artifact, or randomly mention it. Pettigrew could have randomly mentioned it once, but unless he had a real reason (like "They escaped from us, James must be using his invisibility cloak"), I doubt he'd talk about it to Voldemort. He was scared of him, it's not like they had little chats around tea together :P
Braeden Donnelly --This is a serious holey one though, while Voldemort went to kill Harry, there’s no way I believe he thought HE’D get zapped by the rebound, which would mean the sword (if it was there) would’ve been there. Nope, I’m not buying this one.
Marissa Clopton I just want a video that they explain each time Trelawney predicts something and if she is correct and I want to know their opinion on if she’s a fraud
You still haven't established when Pettigrew became secret keeper, he could have been sad because Voldemort was torturing him. Voldemort could have received the Potter's location much closer to when he killed them. Also, the sword has never merely presented itself to someone worthy, the pond was Snape's doing and all other instances it came out of the sorting hat.
The only times we've seen it present itself to anyone has been through the Sorting Hat, but there are clearly multiple cases of it appearing throughout wizarding history, & in those cases, all we're told is that it will present itself to any worthy Gryffindor, not that the hat necessarily has to be there, too. Snape only put the sword in the pond because Dumbledore said Harry had to claim it under circumstances of extraordinary bravery, so if the hat were necessary for that, he would've had Snape bring Harry the hat, rather than the sword itself. Also, it'd just be fairly poor design if the only way you could get Gryffindor's sword was if you happened to have the Sorting Hat handy 'cos A.) you're far more likely to find yourself in need of a sword & demonstrating remarkable bravery in a situation outside of school, & B.) even if you do find yourself in that situation at school, you still probably won't have the Sorting Hat nearby as that's kept in the headmaster's office.
Unless you can somehow change who the Fidelius Charm's secret keeper is (might be possible, but the wording in the books seems to imply that Sirius convinced them to use Peter right from the start of the Charm's effect), Peter would have been the secret keeper and thus known whwre they were hiding right when they went into hiding.
Fudge mentioned earlier in the book, when he was out drinking with Hagrid, Flitwick, McGonagall, that "barely a week after the Fidelius Charm had been performed --". I'm thinking all those in the Order were hiding already. And Voldemort would have to wait to see who was pregnant, for the prophecy was made before Lily was pregnant. That messes up the theories of the SuperCarlinBrothers on the timeline.
'He did,' said Fudge heavily. 'And then, barely a week after the Fidelius Charm had been performed -' 'Black betrayed them?' breathed Madam Rosmerta. It can only have been one week from when the Fidelius charm was performed and Pettigrew made the secret keeper, to when the Potters were murdered.
No, because that's heresay. What you are sharing here is unreliable characters who were NOT there when it happened, over a DECADE after it happened, relating what other people who were NOT there have told them about a situation that was shrouded in secrecy and lies from the beginning. That is literally the least reliable source of information ever. If this WAS the actual, factual way it went down, it's bad writing that these characters KNOW this. They shouldn't know the real details of the situation. Their information SHOULD be wrong, because there is no way they could possibly know. You can't just take ANY chunk of information from the books and treat it as fact, especially when a character is speaking. You have to consider who the character is, what their motives are, what their relation to the event is, etc. The writer knows all - the characters DON'T.
I actually think that Dorcas Meadowes was the one to summon the sword. We don't know for sure that she was a Gryffindor, however we do know that she was killed by Voldemort himself from Moody. Voldemort was known to distrust even his own Death Eaters. Would he have trusted his own people to bring him the sword after the deaths of the Gideon and Fabian? Also, the sword has only shown up in places it would be useful. I think it "knew" it would be useful in killing the Basilisk and Nagini the horcrux, and therefore appeared to Harry and Neville. I don't think a duel with 5 death eaters would be the most efficient place for a sword. Therefore, I think Voldemort manufactured a situation in which both Dorcas would need the sword to escape and yet could still be killed by Voldemort.
This is a child's idea of adaptation criticism. It amazes me how so many fans are hung up on this nit pick as if it's the biggest problem in the series.
I loved that the sword of Gryffindor had the power to absorb things that would make it stronger, and the first thing we know it does is take the venom from Slytherins protector. it always made me think like it was uniting the strengths of the houses under Hogwarts. wonder if its future name will be the sword of Hogwarts, once it gains something from the other two.
I think being turned into a horcrux would have made the sword stronger because not many things can destroy horcruxes. But does that mean that when Harry kills the Basilisk with the sword, would the venom kill the part of the soul that was in the sword?
Sandra G I think that if voldermort did put his soul in the sword then he'd be truly immortal because the sword takes in whatever makes it stronger so if someone did hit the sword with a basilisk fang it'll only make the sword stronger so I doubt anything will destroy the sword or soul, maybe only another sword equal to it could destroy it
Well, I don’t think the quality or quantity of the soul matters. Horcruxes are practically indestructible objects. As such, there’s a chance that the sword would take in a horcrux. But I’m not convinced it would even be possible. The sword is already a powerful magical object and it’s already impervious to damage. A horcrux might not offer additional strength or protection. Could go either way I guess.
Also, i think the venom of the Basilisk could not kill the piece of soul in the sword. A horcrux is destroyed when the container is damaged beyond repair. This is important, because the sword indeed was not damaged from the venom. Therefore the horcrux would live. This leaves the question on if the sword could be destroyed at all. The answer is yes. The sword is made from goblin-forged steel, and like every other metal weapon can be melted down. On top of that, we already know from the diadem that fiendfyre is more than enough to kill a horcrux. So in all, there is a chance the sword could be a horcrux. It does not matter that its a magical item, the ring was as well. The sword's enchanted ability to absorb properties of items it strike would protect the horcrux. And the horcrux in the sword would not be invincible, it could be killed just like all the other ones were.
Any theories on why Bellatrix couldn't have tortured the longbottoms into insanity in a (successful?) attempt to get the sword? Was that not along the timeline?
The longbottoms would have had to have been cursed before voldemort went after harry. otherwise neville would have never been an option to be the chosen one. we know that voldemort is the one who chose which one it was so neville's parents would have already been "gone". i believe bellatrix was torturing them to get the sword and did obtain it for voldemort. this also explains why she believes it's in her vault because voldemort gave it to her for safe keeping but snape switched them causing the sword in the vault to be a fake
I said she only hid it. But if the Longbottoms weren't already gone, Neville wouldn't be considered a possible chosen one. Since it is cannon that he is, they had to have harmed the Longbottoms before. Harry wasn't like Voldemort until Harry became a hulcrux.
In order for your theory to work, you realise you have to ignore a DIRECT line of dialogue that specifies the Longbottoms were attacked AFTER Voldemort attempted to kill Harry: "The Longbottoms were popular. The attacks on them came after Voldemort's fall from power, just when everyone thought they were safe." -Dumbledore BOOM, theory disproven. Coming from Dumbledore himself, the Longbottoms were NOT attacked until after Voldemort had already chosen Harry as his rival and fallen from power. Therefore, that CANNOT be when Voldemort got his hands on the sword. Also, all the prophecy actually says is that the Chosen One's parents "thrice defied Voldemort". It's entirely possible that ANY member of the Order has defied Voldemort at least three times. I mean, define "defy Voldemort". Even BEING in the Order could count. Prophecies are vague like that. It's actually made fun of on the wikipedia page for the prophecy; technically, it could just mean that he asked someone for a favour three times in a row and they said no each time. There's ZERO clear definition, and it's highly likely that Harry and Neville weren't the ONLY candidates who fit the prophecy. Come on. At least make sure your theories can't be instantly disproven by googling the timeline and clicking on ONE link.
technically yes, but he never knew. (and it turned out to be his own folly because it allowed Harry to have a second chance -combine with his mom's protection)
No, Voldemort meant to divide his soul into seven pieces, not make seven horcruxes. The seventh piece of his souls was to remain with him. Harry was inadvertently made into a horcrux and, unknown to Voldemort, his soul was now in eight pieces, not the magical number of seven.
It was mentioned in another one of your Harry Potter videos that you should read the Percy Jackson books and do videos on them. I think you should as well, I enjoyed them as much as Harry Potter. I believe there are 17 main books out now that take place in that "universe" and who knows how many there will be. Percy Jackson and the Olympians (5 books) The Kane Chronicles (3 books) The Heroes of Olympus (5 books) Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard (3? books) I just read that this series is done, I haven't finished book 3 yet so I don't know based on the little reading I have done to put this list together. The Trials of Apollo (2 books out as of now)(5 books may be planned?) Then there are a few "side/short" stories and reference guides and such as well. I think this is the correct order in witch the sets were released and the order I (as well as everyone else that picked them up as they released) read them.
That would be awesome. Didnt do much more then look up the series names to make sure i had them correct and the tidbit about Magnus Chase caught my eye, didn't look into it beyond that.
cosmic spooky The cloak did not have a connection to Voldemort's family or to the founders. Voldemort might have used it had he known it was a Deathly Hallow, but he did not.
![Why Does The Elder Wand Keep Losing? [Harry Potter Theory]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kvYeg0Ipj8Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![Why Does The Elder Wand Keep Losing? [Harry Potter Theory]](/img/tr.png)
Hufflepuff: The Cup
Slytherin: The Locket
Ravenclaw: The Tiara
Gryffindor: Harry Potter
The *diadem
although harry was an accident
@@timhochstetler4515 aren't we all? ;)
DazedTwitch YES then what is the ring
@@nathanpfirman625 Family, Mother...?
I still think it's super sweet that Mr and Mrs Weasley named Fred and George in honor of Fabian and Gideon
I wonder if they were twins too. There's no proof they were but it's my little headcanon.
@@SaraNoH27 they definitely were
@@patchworkundead4787 proof?
@@wolverineiscool7161 Well, in the pictures they look identical and they died fighting together. Seems twin-y. Technically not proof but I don't see why it was written that way if they weren't.
But Fred and Goerge are 2 years older than Harry, meaning Fabian and Gideon were still alive when they were born.
"sorting hat" "sword".... it is actually a "swording hat"
Jonas Vogel bruh.... Mind... Blown.....
#illuminaticonfirmed
Godric "Yeah guys we can use this and call it a swording hat"
Rowena "You mean sorting hat?"
Godric "... yes..."
The name is foreshadowing for book two "sword in hat"
elephant chessboard 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤬reported
Voldemort: Knock Knock
James: Who’s there?
Voldemort: You Know
James: You Know who?
Voldemort: Exactly.
James: Aw, Dang!
Edit: HOW DID THIS GET SO MANY LIKES WHAT-
😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 nice
🤣🤣🤣🤣
*the big haha*
Aaawwweeeee fiddlesticks
Grace Elliott lol keep spreading the world and I ate how people say you copied it
That fight between Fabian, Gidion and the five death eaters would have been incredible. Molly's older brothers must have been very very gifted wizards.
I read that as 'very very giraffe wizards.' Then I thought yeah that makes sense, they have kinda weird necks in that drawing lol
“Physical possession of the sword is not guaranteed ownership, as the sword can magically disappear and reappear at any merit it chooses. In Deathly Hallows, Griphook steals the sword from Harry after helping break into Gringotts, but the sword vanishes from his possession as he is not a true gryffindor.” So even if Voldemort got the sword, it might disappear before he could turn it into a horcrux because he’s not a true gryffindor.
Meaning it disappears before he killed Harry's mother hence why voldys soul latched onto harry potter. Imo this makes perfect sense
OMG this explains
@@ctheultimategamer172 why before killing his mother
We know Snape, a Slytherin, took the sword from behind the painting in the Headmaster's office and placed it in the bottom of the frozen pond in Deathly Hallows. So it's possible for a non-Gryffindor to take it, transport it, etc. without it disappearing. Apparently, the sword just does whatever it (or JK Rowling) wants to do.
@@c.w.9501 Sir, true Gryffindor does not necessarily mean that you should be in Gryffindor house. It means that you should have the qualities of a worthy Gryffindor to own or use the sword.
Never let Voldemort plan your wedding- or never let him buy the ring.
Let him plan your ex's wedding 😈
Agreed.
😹
Wow that joke is soooo original
ALWAYS! No... NEVER! Let Voldemort plan your wedding!
Making the sword a horcrux just seems like a bad idea
The symbolism aside, Voldemort wants horcruxes that can be used to restore him to life. Putting one in an object that might simply vanish into the hands of the enemy at any moment is a big, unnecessary risk.
You can't destroy the sword without the sword
Prince Pug basilisks can.
@@fabianbinder3681 wouldn't it be absorbed? Like last time? "The sword absorbs what makes it stronger" So... I guess if it actually became a horcrux it would be indestructible.
M S
I think it would simply absorb the power of that piece of Voldemort’s soul for whatever power it’s worth. So its impossible to make a horcrux out of as the piece of his soul couldn’t attach itself to the sword without being absorbed.
Voldemort would know the swords abilities so he wouldn't risk putting a part of his soul in it. Also goblin magic wouldn't be compatible with his. But the indestructible sword theory is interesting.
Peter Pettigrew/Wormtail seemed to have more regret for betraying James and Lily in the books than in the movies.
There were so many discrepancies in the books and movies it could be a book in and of itself. I think that Wormtail was so intimidated by Voldemort's considerable power that he probably felt he had no choice. He didn't want to die. So, he became what we saw in the books.
Yeah i mean he died in the malfoy manor when he hesitated to hurt harry... the silver hand voldemort gave him strangled him to death at the slightest sign of mercy..
ICE97 _98 less mercy and more cowardice or Betral depending how you look at it, it’s like what Sirius said Peter seeks out the strongest , at school this was Sirius and James, and during the war the order but as we all know he turns coat and gets an unknown number of people killed, now at the end of his life ( unknowingly) he senses Harry is going to turn the tide on Tom riddle , so he decided to help Harry most likely in an attempt to gain favour
@@ann._.002 wormtail didnt intend to show mercy to harry, its stated that a magical bond is created when a wizard saves the life of another wizard. harry saved wormtails life when he defended him from lupin and black. wormtail was chocking harry when harry reminds him, which causes wormtail to let go. since it was important to mention this bond in the book, id say that means he didnt choose to let go but was instead compelled to return the favor
Lol _PERFECT_ Dumbledore Impression 😂😂
certainly a better Dumbledore than Michael Gambone
13:06 no, the sword of Gryffindor did not just “appear “ in the lake. Snape put it there on dumbledore’s orders
Edit: also, the sword of Gryffindor was bewhiched to appear in the sorting hat for a worthy Gryffindor
ALANA BIGGERSTAFF yes but he was saying that it doesn’t have to come to you through the sorting hat
But Snape only puts it in the frozen lake because Dumbledore's portrait says it must be claimed under circumstances of extraordinary bravery.
After watching a few of his videos, I’ve noticed a few mistakes that he makes. I don’t believe he knows a lot of the finer details
Given how the sword presents itself to worthy Gryffindors under situations of great valor and the Sorting Hat stays at the school in the Headmaster's office, I very much doubt that many others besides Harry and Neville could have gotten the sword out of the hat because there would be so few opportunities to have a situation requiring valor while also happening to be in the same room as the hat. The hat is a good way to call the sword if you need it because the hat belonged to Gryffindor too, but that doesn't mean that it has to or even usually does present itself that way.
ALANA BIGGERSTAFF so it’s molnar
The idea of the sword presenting itself to Fabian & Gideon right before they get killed by Death Eaters is kind of funny to me. Because it means that the sword just randomly shows up, even when it can't really do anything useful.
Like what if a worthy Gryffindor is drowning in an ocean while trying to rescue someone else and then the sword just appears out of the sky and bonks them on the head
Would the sword be useful in a wizard fight?
Dun bring a sword to a wand fight, am I right? 😆
I think Godric had intended it to be used for a sword duel which may have been common in his time? 🤔
At least the man himself was a fan of 'em.
@@Broockle To be fair, the sword is made by goblins. Likely, it could completely deflect spells, as goblin metal only takes on that which makes it stronger.
Something I just thought of while re-watching this video: What if the seemingly insignificant deaths were in fact emotionally significant to Voldemort? Considering his mother used a love potion to coerce Tom Sr. into a sexual relationship, it's not inconceivable that Tom Jr. would think of his mother as a "tramp" who loved a muggle. Therefore, his murder of a "muggle tramp" could have been symbolic in his mind for killing his mother. Maybe each of the other Horcrux deaths are equally symbolic in some way?
Anything I can clear up? :)
I wouldn't say that the horcrux selection implies any sort of sympathy, the sheer nature and purpose of the spell denies that as a possibility. But many psychopathic killers chose there victims for a reason, often an emotional one - even more so when they have an important goal in mind. No sympathy required, nor did I intend to suggest there was. :)
Well said
Good theory!
Mind blown 🤯
Don't forget the irony that Voldemort intended to make his final horcrux in Gryffndor's hometown, but that Harry ended up destroying the first horcrux in Slytherin's secret chamber.
Nice
Keith Grubaugh ✋🏼 Up Top
@TAD maybe he knew the sword was a fake, voldy is a very powerful wizard clearly. He ordered it to be put in the vault anyway because he knew that there was a chance harry and his friends would come looking for it? and there are only a few things more dangerous than trying to rob a gringotts vault and he counted on harry to get killed or get caught.
@@wolverineiscool7161 He had already made nagini his 6th horcrux (it was in fact 7th because harry was one but voldemort never knew)
Also voldemort was shocked to his core when he found out about the cup, he couldn't have suspected anything
S E V E N _holds up 3 fingers_ 3:37
which leaves 7 fingers down :)
@@madmeddik wow. .so true
There are Asian cultures in which the three fingers he used (thumb plus index plus middle) means 7. thumb plus index is six. maybe he's from Singapore?
I dont think he means it buy counting i think he was just moving his hands a lot while talking
Nathan Fong Hes clearly American you dunce
Imagine Voldey just tries to make a horcrux but then the sword's just like:
~Slurps~ hippity hoppity your soul is now my property
Yes I really think that ancient magic of Gryffindor would be more powerful than the current magic.
Yubi yubi
🤣
Voldemort must have wanted to say "Trick Or Treat!" To the potter's before he killed them. That must have been the reason he waited till Halloween
Also Halloween is believed to be a very powerful night in terms of magic. So being a drama queen, Voldemort wants Harry's death to be extra special.
it because he would fit with his costume in the muggle world
OBVIOUSLY
Or its a good night for dark magic.....
*LAUGH
S* 😂
If I were making a horcrux, I would make it something random, like an obscure gram of sand so that anyone looking for it would have no chance.
Interesting thought... If ordinary enough, then when it should get broken would it cause questions, because it did not break (shatter, dent,etc)? Good idea especially if just tossed and goes to a landfill, because then it would get lost and no one would be the wiser. It seemed to me that he wanted to protect them and therein was the problem. The protection alone or keeping secret automatically draws people to want to find. If that were to happen, then would that mean that evil wins and the good would lose. A good example is a hollowed out book with your valuables out in the open versus of safe on/in the wall. The safe states if you had valuables it would be there, and if not you have none for the taking. I like this thought process for being the winner. Now, if this were true, then would anyone be able to find the item(s) in time to destroy in order for Voldemort to die and the current evil with him? My guess is Harry would have died a second death, then all the world would be under Voldemort's rule.
I would choose a glass of water then I pour the water into the sea...good luck destroying that!
What are the limits to what you can make a horcrux though? Like, could you make the sun or moon a horcrux? Because that'd be pretty unstoppable
I guess they‘re very powerful and therefore easy to track down by good wizards like Dumbledore because they can feel the power. So it wouldn‘t help to take the easiest items and just dig them into the earth but, like voldemort did, secure them in different dangerous places surronded by traps etc.
Andi Animates same
You guys can never really escape horcrux theories can ya? (Not that I'm complaining, I LOVE these theories).
Same!
RAPTORUS!!! from the pokemon in scg!
Agreed
Some of the best theories.
what would have happened if voldemort was successful in chamber of secrets?
Voldemort: trick or treat
James: answers door
Also Voldemort: Avada kedavra
dave sharp thats not super far from how it went
@@cxfxcdude ah Halloween. The most murdery of all nights lol
Lily: not my husband you monster
Voldemort: Avada Kedavra
Man said trick
It probably went more like:
Voldy: Trick or treat!
James: Here is your candy kid... wait... you are not a kid
Voldy: no im not a kid, but you are dead, also i choose trick, Avada Kedavra
Lily: WHY DID YOU DO THIS YOU MONSTER?
Voldy: he gave me the worst candy that exists in the store next door, seriously, very rude, anyways DIE!
the irony is that he made harry a horecrux when he was trying to use harry to make a horecrux
Maybe oldy voldy is dyslexic
Maybe the sword reflected voldy’s soul into Harry?
True true
Absolutely, that’s some serious iron!
Rose Granger-Weasley *Horcrux not horecrux
Alternate theory: We don’t actually know a bunch about how horcruxes are made, but we do know that it is a very significant magical event, which requires a powerful wizard, what if it also requires magically significant days? The Harry Potter series shows constantly that halloween is magically significant, at least to Harry, and in real world “magic lore” halloween is significant. It could be that Halloween was the closest convenient and magically significant day under which horcruxes could be made. If we go by real world “lore” the fall solstice would happen first, but it could be too close to when Voldemort received the information to matter, being only a month and a half, given that it’s possible to ritual to create horcruxes requires very specific ingredients, which is why Slughorn might know about it, being a potions master.
arent u supposed to eat the victim? i remember cannibalism being part of it
@@ryanward5770 not really.. the books say that the victims of voldemorts horcux making were unharmed, no signs of anything, just like all the others killed by avada kedavra.. so i guess one would have seen if voldy took a bite.. but there were no traces at all.. so no that is certainly not how a horcurx is made..
Also there is a theory that Rowling kind of alluded to. Its that Horcruxes are made by killing the person then proceeding to comit cannibalism as part of the ritual. This may have been a way to objectify them so then the soul would grab onto an object. And as the Potters’s bodies were found intact that may have been why his soul latched onto Harry
This would explain why he used a vagrant for one and a peasant for another, because if he was on a time crunch and couldn't find a suitable sacrifice... but he had to do it on _that_ day.
Makes sense.
@@Dunkelelf3 plus moaning myrtle said that she stayed to watch her body. She would have said something about her body being desecrated
Voldemort is such a drama queen.
lol never heard anyone describe him that way but I see it
Well if you're going to be an evil villain, might as well do it in style.
Fancy Jammie K he is SUCH a drama queen! All his symbols and beliefs and the way he makes Hagrid carry harry back after he believes he's dead yay he's a guy who loves the limelight!
Is the 'limelight' pun intended?
Fancy Jammie K
He had a tiara, a cup, a locket, and a pet he adores
So. Order members seemed to drop like flies in the lead up to Lily and James being murdered, and Harry survived. Was Pettigrew responsible for all of the other deaths, if he was funneling info for a year? I suspect so.
That sounds about right
Not necessarily. The other order members weren't in hiding, I guess they sometimes launched some sort of an attack or were on a mission that went wrong and they ended up outnumbered.
here's a fan theory
harrys mother's love didnt save him, the fact that voldmort tried to make a horcrux out of an item that couldnt be damaged did. a fragment of his soul wouldnt make the sword stronger so it would reject it
It'd have a certain amount of poetry that the sword went on to present itself to the one who was the intended mark... from the very same source even.
@@propheinx2250 wouldn't it be interesting to think the sword accidentally made the lightning scar? I know it didn't, but it's something to think about.
Watching this a year late... but maybe he:
1. Split his soul as he cast the killing curse
2.a. The curse rebounds off Lily’s love shield
2.b. The part of the soul that he attempted to put in the sword is rejected
3.a. The rebounding curse kills his physical body and that part of his soul
3.b. The rejected soul fragment can’t go into the sword or back into his dead body (if that is even an option)
4. His stranded soul fragment flees to Albania
@please respect the roses she also said that cursed child is canon and that hermione isnt white so...
@please respect the roses fair enough
Every single time you did the Dumbledore voice I kept envisioning the Mysterious Ticking Noise video. Very good Dumbledore voice and great theory as always.
Snape, Snape, Severus Snape
That never gets old and puts a smile on my face every single time. 😸
"Voldemort! Voldemort! Ooh! Voldy! Voldy! Voldy! Voldemort! Ba dum bum bum!"
Old moldy Voldy. I just love no matter how many years have past Harry Potter books, films, and other videos never go out of date. 😀
I quite like this theory. While I doubt the sword would have simply allowed Voldemort to hold onto it instead of just disappearing, Voldemort may have had some spell to counteract this effect. Other than that, I see next to no problems here, so good video!
As for whether or not the sword would accept Voldemort's soul, Horrcruxes are nearly indestructible so I think the sword may very well have accepted it as that would make it stronger, had Voldemort gotten the chance to make the sword a Horrcrux of course.
Also, I think Voldemort chose the sword for an extra reason. The sword is a powerful weapon and only presents itself to worthy Gryffindors. Imagine if some Gryffindor hero, the last one resisting Voldemort's regime, was fighting bravely in a battle and was able to summon the sword. However, the sword immediately turns on the hero, because it is possessed and controlled by a piece of Voldemort's soul. Such an insidious weapon would be a perfect way for Voldemort to combat his enemies, and if he could bend the enchantment to his will like how he can control other Horrcruxes, he could use it to track down all the most dangerous Griffindors.
That's just wild speculation, but great video regardless!
This comment wasn't all that long, but I suppose you can have a cookie anyway! See you around peeps!
And when Voldemort was thrown from his body, the spell keeping the sword from leaving was broken.
If the sword only appears to worthy Gryffindors, I think it also has something that would make it reject being made into a horcrux. Or it might just be the destructive quality of the sword that would destroy Voldemort's soul and fail the horcrux spell.
Nate TSO Nice minitheory, could be, I like it!
The sword only supposedly appears to worthy Gryffindors because it was commissioned by Godric Gryffindor; it was, however, Goblin-made and people need to keep that it mind. It's not a sword of righteousness; it's just enchanted to appear for worthy Gryffindor's a.k.a. the brave, the bold, the chivalrous. The only limitation it has is that it only takes in that which makes it stronger, and as Horcruxes are incredibly difficult to destroy, it would have become a Horcrux had Riddle succeeded in killing Harry.
Maki Horcruxes are not specifically Slytherin related and a very dark field of Magic of the kinds that I don't think Godric would've had any reason to specifically counter act that with his enchantment. As for the destructive quality; it's not the sword but the basilisk venom which destroys the horcruxes. But I think that gives another question: Would have kiling the basilisk with the sword destroyed the horcrux in the sword itself and would the sword itself survive the killing of the contained horcrux? Would the sword not appear when the needing fights something that could destroy the swords horcrux?
Also Voldemort specifically chose October 31st for his attack because of Sahmain, a Celtic holiday, which both Halloween and Dia De Los Muertos are based on, that celebrates the belief that the veil between the living world and the dead one is at its thinnest, thus being the perfect date to end his journey for immortality.
It would have been really hard to destroy the sword of gryffindor because it absorbs what makes it stronger, as seen in the chamber of secrets where it absorbs the basilisks toxic blood or venom. This venom is able to destroy horcruxes as Hermione explains in Deathly hallows. So if you tried to destroy the sword of gryffindor with a basilisk's tooth, it would just have no effect at all because the sword would just absorb the venom as it has before in the chamber of secrets when Harry kills the basilisk.
At least that's how I understand it and Hermione explained it in Deathly Hallows.
Would the soul even be absorbed by the sword? Mortality wouldn't really help make a sword stronger. Also if it was Horcrux'd, Harry killing the Basilisk would cause the Horcrux in the sword to be destroyed due to the Basilisk Venom.
@@johnlucas2838 good point but idk if it is possible to destroy the horcrux in an object without destroying the object itself. This could however work as you described when the sword absorbs the venom which destroys the horcrux within. However I do think that it would be possible to bind a piece of ones soul to the sword eventhough it only absorbs what makes it stronger, because as far as I'm concerned objects that become horcruxes don't exactly absorb the soulpiece but rather get bound to it.
So you're saying the bound enchantment of the Horcrux would be fighting against the absorbing enchantment of the sword. Because the way I see it would be they would come into conflict. The sword that was enchanted to take in that which made it stronger while the horcrux doesn't make the sword stronger. It would seem.... parasitic in a sense.
@@johnlucas2838 it definetely would come in to conflict but I'm not sure how it would actually end up being and how the horcrux could be destroyed.
Voldemort would have become truly immortal.
uhhhh, I think we should remake the Harry Potter movies and J should just play ALL the characters
(with corresponding socks of course).
That’s a shit idea
YES! That's hilarious.
It’s my personal theory that Voldemort got the Gryffindor sword when he killed James Potter. The would sword appeared to James Potter, who in an act of courage, tried to save his family, but died to Voldemort.
It makes sense..
But fibian and gidian just sounds so much more ... romantic?
Two brothers fighting five death eaters and potentialt Voldemort.
Idk i always had a soft spot for twins.
Btw we need an old order of the pheonix spinoff
Why would Voldemort go there without an item to make into a Horcrux though? Considering the time gap, i don't think your theory is very likely.
Oh man I love that idea!
I had this idea too, i think he tried to get it from Fabien and Gideon but it either didn't appear bc they were armed already; hence the sneak attack despite Voldemort being overwhelmingly powerful, or the sword appeared and vanished in the ensuing chaos. It makes sense though bc James was specifically unarmed and Voldemort killed him rather than use imperio to control him as he was a strong wizard himself and Voldemort says that he doesn't want to waste any magic blood.
@@duckchickenpenguin6178 its not "romantic" lol but i do think theres a better chance of it being f and g
I will rephrase my previous statement...when Tom was talking to Prof. Slughorn, he asked about dividing the soul into seven pieces, not make seven horcrux's. Does anyone else see this or agree that he only wanted 6 horcrux's...?
harry was not intentional..... books clearly says this
The dumbledor at the station scene states he is the horcrux that voldimort never ment to make
Nagini was only made a horcrux in Goblet of Fire. So Voldemort was 1 short of his goal when he went to kill baby Harry. He didn’t know Harry was made a horcrux, so unintentionally made one extra when he came back.
Yes but things changed from the time he was a kid to when he looked like the poster model for Michael Jackson’s plastic surgeon
Yes. Voldy's original plan for Horcruxes is the diary, the ring, locket, cup, diadem, sword. Nagini was Plan B when he failed to kill Harry. And he did not know that Harry became a sort of Horcrux.
Rowling should have written a book series dedicated solely to the life of Voldemort beginning at his birth or even just his start at the orphanage and at least up until the events of The Philosopher's Stone. The people want more Voldemort.
The only thing I consistently found myself wanting every time I read the books and watched the movies was more of Voldemort's story.
Your Dumbledore voice gives me life
Winnie Ye u should look up Potter puppet pals
To add to this, what if the sword not only wouldn't take the soul piece but aided in Harry's protection by halting/redirecting the killing curse and deflected (intentionally or not) the piece of voldys soul into Harry making him the unintentional horcux, just think about it. Mind blown. If it wouldn't take the soul piece, the piece may have gone to the closest thing, Harry.
Raine250 love it.
Raine250 are you saiyng that the Sword of Griffindor appeared and protected Harry in that night?
Excellent idea!
yes omg that makes so much sense!!
sorry but no
it would go directly against the story if that were too happen
Funny thing about this theory is that he did technically end up getting something from Gryffindor… Harry
Though this theory is good I think I found the real reason voldemort took so long to kill the potters: Peter became the secret keeper and sent a massage to voldemort (maybe by owl?) who was pretty far away at the time getting the sword. He was like "oh shoot" and went wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh flying to the potters house. By the time he got there it had already been a few months.
Or Voldemort is a massive drama queen, considering he held his resurrection at the end of the Triwizard Tournament when he could have just had Barty Jr kidnap him while at Hogwarts, such as when he caught Harry, Krum, and Barty Senior on the edge of the Forbidden Forest. I get the feeling that self-propelled flight was something he perfected during OotP or HBP, since during the former he was keeping a low profile, and in the latter his actions in the present aren't even mentioned after the summer ends; and during the Battle of the Seven Potters, everyone in the Order reacts like Voldemort being able to fly without any aid is something he didn't have before.
hahahha! voldemort is so dumb to use flying instead of apparating as a means of transportation. DUMB DUMB DUMB
Taylor Hinckley there are limits to how far you can aporate, in book seven it says that Voldemort had to fly till he was close enough to aporate
Isaac Leonard Yeah, so many people forget that in their haste to make fun of Voldemort
Taylor Hinckley Voldemort was very stressed at the time, so he probably really benefitted from that massage
Gabbian and Fiddeon, Gred and Forge
god I miss Fred
That Avada Kedavra sure didn't
Olly Dundas Gideon *
so does gorge
Happy now
I really like this theory, but my only gripe is that Voldemort probably wouldn't have wanted an object from Gryffindor that was known for teleporting. All of his other horcruxes were hidden away from the world, so I think he would find the sword rather unreliable - but then again, we are talking about the same guy who had access to the chamber of secrets, a chamber only he could enter and yet he choose the room of requirement to store the diadem, so his judgement might not be the best.
Also, would it even have been possible to destroy the sword if it became a horcrux? The sword only takes in what will make it stronger and since it just absorbed the venom from the basilisk would one the fangs have been able to destroy it then? Maybe that would be why he would want to make it a horcrux then.
thomas jeppesen definitely bring up some great points. Although, Who knows how containing part of Voldemort’s soul would of affected the sword. It may have hindered how it would present itself.
I completely agree though, that even if it didn’t affect its ability to appear and disappear, The fact that there would be almost nothing that could destroy it would outweigh that disadvantage to him. Then there’s also the fact that I don’t think he would’ve wanted pass up the opportunity of corrupting an item from every house.
I feel like stabbing it with the Basilisk fang would have actually killed the Horcrux... but not the sword itself. I may be wrong, but I think I heard somewhere that it's possible to kill a Horcrux without destroying the object itself, depending on its properties.
The sword only takes in that would make it stronger... I think that turning it into a horcrux would probably make it weaker ...so... A rejected rebound horcrux.... And that's why Harry became a horcrux cause the sword rejected a piece of his (voldmorts) soul
I like the idea of the sword "deflecting" the horcrux spell onto Harry.
Also yeah, Voldy should have hidden the diadem in the chamber of secrets. Imagine the scene:
*Ravenclaw student* No one's seen it for centuries (shows a picture)
*Ginny* I've seen that!
*Everyone* What? Where?
*Ginny* In the chamber of Secrets
*Harry* That makes sense actually, considering Voldy is the heir of Slytherin.... Ok let's get to it...
An excellent thought. My thought was either that or the sword conveniently disappeared (do to there not being any Griffindor's present) during the creation of the horcrux so the piece of soul latched onto harry. Rebound would make more sense as that would explain Tom Riddles death and turning harry into a horcrux.
To me, the reason why the sword often appears inside the Sorting Hat is simply because the hat was Godric Gryffindor's
"HARRAH DID YOU PUT CHOUR NAME IN THE GOBLUT OF FIYAH!?!?"
-Dumbledore said calmly
Levi Reeves *calmly*
CALM DUMBLEDORE CALMMMMM
*I'M COMPLETELY CALM*
I aM bEiNg CaLm OkAy
This is why, when the lord of the rings was being filmed, Ian McKellen literally carried the books around like a BIBLE. This is why. Michael Gambon, you should've done the same thing.
5 Death Eaters versus The 2 Prewett's
That makes 7 people at the time where Voldemort's 7th planned Horcrux would show.
It's too perfect.
Why would voldemort makes a horcrux out of a constantly disappearing sword that falls easly in griffindor hands ?, does not make any sense.
I genuine think he is vain and arrogant enough to overlook that fact.
HAL 9000 very good point
On the other hand: If a horcrux is a constantly disappearing sword, that can only be found by very few people under the right circumstances, it's already pretty good hidden, isn't it?
What if harry turned out to be the horcrux from Gryffindor???(I know it was an accident that he became a horcrux from the movie stand point)
@@jimmonroe3123 I was thinking the exact same thing. In the end Voldemort DID make a Griffindor horcrux.
Here's a thought. When Molly's brothers were attacked by the death eaters the sword likely came to them and the disappeared when they died. Guess Voldamort heard that this happened and knew it would be presented to James too if he was attacked. So he went to Godrics Hollow believing the sword would be there.
Snape was a Slytherin, yet the sword stayed in the headmasters office, and Snape could even put it in the lake where it waited for Ron and Harry.
So the sword doesn't seem to disappear after the person who summoned no longer has it.
Wasn't the sorting hat also Gryffindor's? Isn't that why the hat and sword are linked? Why isn't anyone worried the that Voldemort would want the hat? The hat himself says that that Gryffindor made him when the founders were trying to decide how sorting would work. Which is honestly just a whole other weird relationship. Like all other kids in the world "I wish my dog could talk" and then Godric Gryffindor "I wish my clothes could talk".
Yep. In Goblet of Fire the Sorting had mentions it. "Twas Gryffindor who found the way He whipped me off his head. The founders put some brains in me So I could choose instead."
@@PittsburghSportsFan43 yes.. it was gryffindors hat but all the founders made it together..
@@Dunkelelf3 Thank you!
Yes but the hat can talk, and sing. seems like a bad place for a horcrux.
Everyone knows about the hat’s existence while i don’t think knowledge of the sword is as widely known. It’d be like... stealing abe lincoln’s stovepipe hat rather than his vampire killing ax.
why would Voldemort want a horcrux that can just appear in some of voldemort’s enemies possessions?
Exactly! It would be pretty impossible to protect this horcrux
scrolled to find this.
But let’s be honest, firstly they wouldn’t even know it’s a hocrux unless they somehow do know and the sword is such an important historical artefact especially for gryfindoors that it would be quite upsetting to destroy plus the sword destroys hocroxes so the only way to destroy it is a basilisk fang but tbh not many people know about the chamber of secrets lol
Pippin's logic here ! "The closer to the danger we are, the safer we are ! Because they will not expect us !" (or something close to that :P)
But basically: why would anybody suppose that he used something like that ?
I still don't think that it was his goal since it seems a bit too random (since the sword can move at will and it's usually in Gryffindor, and not lost) and complicated to do, but I like the theory of him trying something that daring. He's Voldemort after all. He believed he could do anything, and nobody or nothing could resist him.
The sword can't be destroyed, "It only takes in that which makes it stronger
1:47 "Is that a peasant? AVAVAKAVAVA!!! Horcrux!" 😂😂😂
peasant lives matter
@Pius Emmanuel Wong Avada Kedavra
@Pius Emmanuel Wong doesnt matter what he says read the books its spelled Avada Kedavra
@Pius Emmanuel Wong Its ok, just letting you know. I used to read the books like a religion,when I was younger(I still have mine,plus the cursed child) so I was obsessed with the Killing Curse!
Pius Emmanuel Wong that is how it is spelled.Didn’t you read the books?
The easier thing to steal would be the sorting hat which used to belong to Godric Gryfindor and was then enchanted by each founder. This would also make it easier for Voldemort to find and identify potential future death eaters by the part of his soul influencing the hats decisions when sorting new students.
That is a horrifying thought.....
1:45 Hey a crown! Is that a peasant? avdvahavrada
Boom hocrux
“avdvahvrada”
Lol so true
I never understood why people write down exactly what happens in the video....
Horcruxes are easy
In the video he doesn't say it properly at all.
I believe that was the inspiration.
"YourBestRen" was just quoting the video, Gavin.
J: He never managed to find something from Gryffindor.
me: Harry Potter's a Gryffindor!
Voldemort omg sameeee
Voldemort I got your nose!
a main gryffondor artifact, students dont count. the sorting hat would.
It had to be something from the founder Godric Gryffindor
Gryffindor's cape broach?
What about this secuence of events. Voldemort uses the spell to kill harry and separate his soul creating the final horrocrux with the sword, then the spell bounce and kills voldemort instead, but the rest of the spell is doing the same, creating the horrocrux with the sword, then the sword rejects voldemort soul and then the soul of voldemort goes to harry's body. It can explain better why harry ends up being an horrocrux, since the soul of voldemort was already trying to become one with the sword.
And the Sword cannot be used for something so cowardly as a horcrux. It absorbs powers, not souls.
That.. That actually makes sense.
I thought of this as well. The sword probably rejected Voldemort's soul since that would mean the sword would need to be destroyed and the sword only takes in whatever makes it stronger. I think making the sword a horcrux would be a disadvantage to it.
But were the diadem and cup Goblin made? As it seems like everything that Wizards put value on (Muriel's Tiara, the Sword, Wizard money in general) is usually made by Goblins, which makes sense from a purely economic point of view as you want objects that are unique and can't just be conjured up by anyone with a wand. If so then the Diadem or cup would have also rejected the souls as well which we know they did not.
Then again the thing that makes the Diadem and Cup valuable and unique aren't really their properties but the fact they were owned by famous sorcerers of the past so it's entirely possible that they are wizard made objects, they are also rumored to have powers but they are never really tested or displayed it would seem like something that would pop up after centuries that they are legendarily powerful objects just because the founders would be legend at this point and that the reality was less that they were exceptional wizards with powerful objects and that they were simply famous and that people that some of their power would have been rubbed off on the objects.
Dumbledore said that part of Voldemort's soul was ripped away from him and attached itself to the only LIVING thing in the Potter house. That was Harry. James did not have the sword or it would have been mentioned in the book. He didn't even have his wand. Voldemort watched through the window. He struck when he knew James had no defense and killed him right away then went after Harry but killed Lily because she wouldn't move away from Harry. Voldemort did not know he had left part of his soul behind in Harry. His body was already so damaged from the rebounding killing curse he couldn't feel his soul being torn again. Remember, voldemort was less t than human, less than anything after he got away from the Potter home. Because he was so weakened he never knew he'd made another horcrux.
Voldemort should have just put his soul in a Nokia phone, I mean try breaking that thing.
I’m surprised that this when unnoticed 😂😂😂
The unbreakable Nokia 3310 wasn't around in the 80s, otherwise he might have.
@@eriks1765 it's a joke
@@eriks1765 oww man
@@eriks1765 you must be real fun at parties
That sword would make a fine addition to his collection
Faysor No...Just No
Enrique Zazueta you’re shorter than I expected
If so powerful pun creator you are, why leave?
prequel meme on a harry potter video? you are a bold one....
Hello there
But voldemort only wanted SIX horcruxes.
His goal was for his soul to be in seven pieces! One of those pieces being in his body.
He only had five when he killed Harry's parents, the sword was meant to be the sixth, he only decided to turn the snake into a horcruxe between the third and fourth books.
Nope. He literally uses the wording "to split the soul seven times". "Seven times" is NOT the same thing as "seven pieces", because you have to remember you're not counting from zero. You're counting from ONE, because the soul already exists. Each time you split the soul you are ADDING to the one that already existed. One plus seven is eight. He intended for seven horcruxes, plus the piece inside his body.
SLUGHORN is the one who uses the wording "seven pieces". But he's not the one creating them. The person who actually created the horcruxes SPECIFICALLY says "split the soul seven times". Eight pieces. Not seven.
@@LordofFullmetal
“Yes, sir,” said Riddle. “What I don’t understand, though - just out of curiosity - I mean, would one Horcrux be much use? Can you only split your soul once? Wouldn’t it be better, make you stronger, to have your soul in more pieces, I mean, for instance, isn’t seven the most powerfully magical number, wouldn’t seven - ?”
I can't find him ever saying "to split the soul seven times." Though Slughorn does interrupt him mid sentence, so it could go either way. Unless what you are referring to is not the memory Slughorn gives to Harry.
His goal was definitely to have 6 horcruxes. He wanted to split his soul into 7, meaning have 7 pieces, just as splitting something in half makes 2 pieces, not 3. He didn't know Harry was a horcrux so he made Nagini his "sixth" horcrux when he came back to life in order to have his perfect 7 pieces.
@@rebeccaschwartz5477 If he wanted seven why would he go to the potters to make a 7th. And if you don't believe that theory why would he make nagini a horcrux later on believing it to be the 7th or even 8th horcrux
maybe voldemort shouldve used the sword to murder harry and saved himself a lot of trouble.
pebbles 72 lol 😂
😂😂😂😂but thats way too uncool for voldemort. Harry's death had to be epic
Ronald James Granger, yep that is very true! Voldermort wanted all the dramatics lol
pebbles 72 I think the protection given to harry by lilly was for all kinds of deaths but stabbing him would be too lame for teh Darkest Lord😂😂😂
That’s what I was saying lmao, like you could just kill him the muggle way, and it wouldn’t have backfired 😆
I love the fact that they’re using the animated version of the Dumbledore puppet from Potter Puppet Pals.
Your Dumbledore impression is now my Ringtone. Thanks!
JIC you haven't seen, I'm pretty sure it's a reference to Potter Puppet Pals... ua-cam.com/video/Y18LUMkVt2Y/v-deo.html
Oh, didn't realise that, thanks for letting me know.
@SuperCarlinBrothers
1:54 The reason Voldemort needed specifik Harry Potters blood to resurect was to break Harrys mothers "love sacrifice spell". If Voldemort himself has Harrys blood (in the body), the spell cant hurt him (like when he died in first movie).
So yes any blood could bring him back, but than Voldemort would still have a weakness to Harry.
Voldemort plays for the long and winning game!
Atlest thats my opinion!
*specific
@@barryo2905 Merry Christmas! ;D
you spelled specific wrong
That is very true and widely accepted, I think he was just being a smartass :P
no, voldemort had no reason at all to believe that using harry's blood would break lily's protection. it had the exact opposite effect. harry's blood inside voldemort is one of the biggest reasons voldemort died in deathly hallows.
Voldemort was seeking to split his soul 7x, rather than making 7 horcrux's.
That is 6 pieces of his soul into 6 horcrux's, then the 7th piece resides within himself.
Just my take.
But ended up being 8 pieces
He split off seven pieces, not split into seven pieces. 1 Diary, 2 Ring, 3 Pendant, 4 Tiara, 5 Cup, 6 Nagini, 7 Harry (meant for the sword) making a total of 8 pieces, counting the one he kept inside himself.
You are correct on what the Horcruxes were but Nagini was created after Harry. I think the OP was right and Voldy had the First 5 and was going to make the Sword the 6th making him have 7 parts including himself. Then instead of the Sword he got Harry but not knowing it when he returned he still thinks he needs 1 more to make 7 parts so he creates Nagini.
Also, Voldemort didn’t know that Harry was the horcrux untill like, Fourth year. All I know is that he made the snake a horcrux before finding out that harry is a horcrux.
@@Marina-by9zq I don't think Voldemort ever found out that Harry was a Horcrux because he would never have deliberately tried to destroy the vessel holding a piece of his soul if he had known about it.
Maybe it was Alice Longbottom who summoned the sword? I can imagine Bellatrix handing Voldy the sword. Maybe she was the only one who was entrusted to handle sword related business from then on.
Valid point. At least as far as the films are concerned. She did have it in her vault which is why the kids had to go there to retrieve it.
The Longbottoms were only attacked after Voldemot disappeared.
Voldemort actually made a horcrux from some very well-preserved toilet paper that Gryffindor used.
He didn’t want to make seven Horcruxes - he wanted to split his soul into seven pieces.
“Can you only split the soul once? For instance, seven...”
“Merlin’s beard, Tom! Isn’t it bad enough to consider killing one person? To SPLIT THE SOUL into seven pieces...”
As in, the part of the soul still inside him, and then the six pieces of soul in the Horcruxes.
3:01 I THOUGHT U SAID "DUMBLEDORE WAS RON", AND I WAS LIKE: seriously?
@@Someone-bg6qu oh, hi hun :)
ginny weasley jordan
An interesting question is how the heroes could have gone about destroying the sword if Voldemort had succeeded in making it a horcrux, and whether it would still have been able to destroy the other horcruxes.
how about a video on what Harry's fear would be if he hadn't seen a dementor before facing the boggart
probably voldemort.
@@quentindiaz9418 which form? Professor quil or Tom riddle...
Ketan Verma he did. On the train to hogwart when he first met Lupin
Jeffrey Chen what Ketan Verma meant was what would have happened if the dementors never showed up? What would harry’s bogart be?
If I remember correctly, it's mentioned in the book he would have seen Voldemort if it hadn't been for the dementors. In the book, Lupin stops him from meeting the Boggart because he fears this will happen (imagine the chaos that would ensue if the Boggart turned into Voldemort in front of the whole class).
What if the sword presents its self to James while he was being attacked? Maybe Voldemort came up with this idea but it just took a while?
it didn't though
And Voldy wouldn't have left that much to chance!
doesnt the sword come out of the sorting hat? why would james or the death eaters have the sorting hat?
Going up against Voldemort without a wand, in my opinion, would certainly constitute a worthy Gryffindor.
I’m guessing maybe Voldemort looked for the sword for a while , but after a while he just said “well crap, I can’t find the sword. I guess I’ll just have to kill Harry and live with 6 horocruxes.” But then the sword appears to James as he tries to stop Voldemort and he says “oh hey! There’s the sword WHOOPIE!!!!!” (This comment was written for the funny dialogue which might not actually be funny).
What if Voldemort thought he had the sword, but it wasn’t the real sword? Remember when Bellatrix went crazy when she realized Harry and Hermione had the sword that was in her vault? That was a fake sword, a very well made copy, but not the original. Maybe that’s how she ended up with the sword in her vault to begin with. I might be wrong but I don’t remember there’s an actual explanation as to how she had the sword in her vault or is there one?
I always assumed that when Snape became Headmaster he commissioned the replica of the sword and gave it to Voldemort in place of the original, which he kept hidden since and not on display as it had been previously under Dumbledore. If I recall correctly, Lucius Malfoy would have seen the sword at the end of CoS, so the idea that Voldemort kept the fake since any moment prior wouldn't add up.
But what would’ve been the point of Snape giving the sword to Voldemort then? I don’t think Voldemort knew that the sword can be used to destroy the horcruxes.
It was explained in the books. Dumbledore told Snape to make a replica. Dumbledore knew Harry would need to original so it wouldn't do for something to happen to it. After Ginny, Neville, and I think Luna tried to steal it it was placed in Bellatrix's vault. The replica, that is. Bellatrix went crazy because Voldemort gave her Hufflepuff's cup to put in her vault, she didn't know what it was, of course, so naturally, the idea someone might have broken in and potentially taken the cup was enough to cause her to go spastic.
Up
Yeah I was thinking the same
He used harrys blood for his resurrection to get his harrys love spell in his own blood. So he could be able to touch Harry. 1st film shows what happend when he tried touching Harry!
I think that he just needed something of all his LIVING horcruxes, Harry’s blood and something from Nagini that’s why he looks like a snake
@@Hsjfiwbrbffbabs he doesn't look like a snake because of Nagini ua-cam.com/video/8t03h4kL348/v-deo.html&ab_channel=SuperCarlinBrothers
I was suprised they missed that in this video as it was talked about alot but really they just ignore some stuff to put out convincing theorys.
What if it is not the sword, but something else for Gryffindor? Or what if he chose a different powerful magical artifact? Lets not forget that one of his horcruxes was the stone of resurrection, one of the Deathly hallows. What if Peter Pettigrow told him about James's invisibility cloak? It would be an artifact "worthy" of becoming a horcrux according to Voldemort's standards. Godric's Hollow is the village where the Peverell brothers lived, those who get/made the Deahtly hallows. And he maybe didn't know that Dumbledore had the cloak at the time, so he went there to get the cloak and kill Harry to make the horcrux, but didn't succeed.
Alizée Denave no the ring that held the Stone was the Horcrux not the Stone itself. Voldemort didn't mind becoming the master of death because he was already immortal by making the Horcruxes and he probably got the wand only because he knew it was realy powerful. he didn't bother trying to get the Stone back either.
Lucas Vasconcelos I don't think he would be interested in the possibility the Deathly hollows have concerning immortality, but he would certainly value them as historical artifacts, just as he does with the objects of Hogwart's founders. Maybe you are right and the ring was the Horcrux, but he must have known about the Deathly hollows as I can't imagine him possessing such a powerful object without wanting to understand where it comes from and how it works. He wore the ring, that we know for sure as we see it in the memories, so he certainly realized what the stone could do even if he was not interested in talking to dead people. I am sure he must have been at least intrigued by the Deathly hollows at this point even if finding them was not a priority. If Peter Pettigrew told him about the invisibility cloak, I think he could have been interested in it and maybe seeing it as an opportunity to make a Horcrux. I truly don't think Gryffindor's sword would have stayed with Voldemort even a minute, so maybe the cloak was an alternative. It is still linked to Gryffindor in a way as the Peverell brothers lived in Gryffindor's village.
Voldemort didn't know about the deathly hallows. Having been raised in a muggle orphanage, he wouldn't have heard the Tale of the Three Brothers as a child. If he did hear the story later, & learn of the hallows, he probably would have brushed it off as pure fiction... the way most muggles think of Atlantis. The ring was significant to V because it had belonged to his grandfather, Marvolo, and was a Slytherin heirloom... and since V buried the ring in his grandfather's shack, he had no idea of the true power of the stone. He only sought the elder wand because there was historical evidence of a powerful wand that wins every duel. He only wanted THAT power after learning about the twin cores & seeking a way to overcome Harry's wand. Also, Dumbledore was the only one [among the heroes] who had made the connection between James' cloak & the hallows. If James knew it's history, he & D would likely have discussed the hallows with each other, so it's unlikely any of the Marauders (including Pettigrew) knew about them.
I did not think Peter would have told him about the cloak mentioning it is a Deathly hallow, but the description he could have given about it would certainly match. Even though Voldemort didn't grow up in a wizarding family, he could have heard about the deathly hallows later and realize their existence when he got the ring. He wore it so he must have realized its power. And he buried it to hide it, as he did with other horcruxes, but I don't think it means he didn't know about its origins. There is nothing in the books on what Voldemort knows or doesn't know on the Deathly Hallows. I do not think he would have been interested in them for their joint power of immortality, but he would have appreciate their historical value as a collector.
I believe that Alizée's point is simply that:
The invisible Cloak is an important Potter (so kind of Gryffindor) heirloom and it's also in itself something really rare and powerful. It's a magical, rare and amazing items, it is in the possession of some of his worst enemies, and he believes their child *can* kill him. It's just so full of symbolism, he might have considered it.
Also Pettigrew definitely knew about its existence since James used it with them.
The only thing is, I don't think Voldemort would have talked about this kind of things with Pettigrew or anybody else. At least in details. I don't see him ask them about ideas for an artifact, or randomly mention it.
Pettigrew could have randomly mentioned it once, but unless he had a real reason (like "They escaped from us, James must be using his invisibility cloak"), I doubt he'd talk about it to Voldemort. He was scared of him, it's not like they had little chats around tea together :P
I think this counts as homework... I mean, theories are informative.
Braeden Donnelly Yep, thought exercise.
I says education so... sure
Braeden Donnelly --This is a serious holey one though, while Voldemort went to kill Harry, there’s no way I believe he thought HE’D get zapped by the rebound, which would mean the sword (if it was there) would’ve been there. Nope, I’m not buying this one.
Snape snape severus snape
dumbledore
Ron Weeesaly
Hermione. Hermionie. Hermionie, Hermione.
Harry pottah! harry pottah! uah! harry pottah! harry pottah! yeah!
We hated him until the last movie where we cried our eyes out.
James is restless in the house..... did JKR just predict quarentine?
🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
Lily and James were self-quarantining. It’s completely normal.
Hahaha
But... isn't Voldemort's nose a horcuxes?!
No one found it.
Dawn Ory It explained got he caught between those magical trains
Oh.
Travis Shirley Amazing 😊
I think Voldemort's soul that has his nose is in Tom Riddle's Diary. Which was destroyed before he was revived. That's why he doesn't have a nose.
George Vincent Corneby I still think he should have made it a horcux.
Who else thinks you should be a detective for the order of the Phoenix!!! How can you figure that out!?!?
He is brilliant! He should be a real life detective!
Aarian Malhotra dh
Ummm... pottermore
@Juliet Felice Oh, you never know people in this world have kept orders going for a long time after their initial purpose...
Trelawney and Divination explained please. I’ve asked this before and gotten a lot of likes so please do a vid
Theodore Ferro, what do you mean? What’s your question?
I don't think it's something that can be explained. It's just a rare gift that certain witches and wizards are born with.
All I know is that her first name (Sybil) means prophetess
Theodore Ferro yeet
Marissa Clopton I just want a video that they explain each time Trelawney predicts something and if she is correct and I want to know their opinion on if she’s a fraud
You still haven't established when Pettigrew became secret keeper, he could have been sad because Voldemort was torturing him. Voldemort could have received the Potter's location much closer to when he killed them.
Also, the sword has never merely presented itself to someone worthy, the pond was Snape's doing and all other instances it came out of the sorting hat.
The only times we've seen it present itself to anyone has been through the Sorting Hat, but there are clearly multiple cases of it appearing throughout wizarding history, & in those cases, all we're told is that it will present itself to any worthy Gryffindor, not that the hat necessarily has to be there, too. Snape only put the sword in the pond because Dumbledore said Harry had to claim it under circumstances of extraordinary bravery, so if the hat were necessary for that, he would've had Snape bring Harry the hat, rather than the sword itself. Also, it'd just be fairly poor design if the only way you could get Gryffindor's sword was if you happened to have the Sorting Hat handy 'cos A.) you're far more likely to find yourself in need of a sword & demonstrating remarkable bravery in a situation outside of school, & B.) even if you do find yourself in that situation at school, you still probably won't have the Sorting Hat nearby as that's kept in the headmaster's office.
Unless you can somehow change who the Fidelius Charm's secret keeper is (might be possible, but the wording in the books seems to imply that Sirius convinced them to use Peter right from the start of the Charm's effect), Peter would have been the secret keeper and thus known whwre they were hiding right when they went into hiding.
Fudge mentioned earlier in the book, when he was out drinking with Hagrid, Flitwick, McGonagall, that "barely a week after the Fidelius Charm had been performed --". I'm thinking all those in the Order were hiding already. And Voldemort would have to wait to see who was pregnant, for the prophecy was made before Lily was pregnant. That messes up the theories of the SuperCarlinBrothers on the timeline.
@@Groundlord could you possibly layer it and have 2 locks.
'He did,' said Fudge heavily. 'And then, barely a week after the Fidelius Charm had been performed -' 'Black betrayed them?' breathed Madam Rosmerta.
It can only have been one week from when the Fidelius charm was performed and Pettigrew made the secret keeper, to when the Potters were murdered.
Is it in the books too? If not, it's not cannon
Royaleagle04 that line they quoted was straight from PoA.
No, because that's heresay. What you are sharing here is unreliable characters who were NOT there when it happened, over a DECADE after it happened, relating what other people who were NOT there have told them about a situation that was shrouded in secrecy and lies from the beginning. That is literally the least reliable source of information ever. If this WAS the actual, factual way it went down, it's bad writing that these characters KNOW this. They shouldn't know the real details of the situation. Their information SHOULD be wrong, because there is no way they could possibly know.
You can't just take ANY chunk of information from the books and treat it as fact, especially when a character is speaking. You have to consider who the character is, what their motives are, what their relation to the event is, etc. The writer knows all - the characters DON'T.
@@royaleagle04 nothing in the books is canon anymore, only JKR's Twitter feed is canon now.
@@AceTheWorrior i guffawed when i read this. I needed a good laugh today 😂
I actually think that Dorcas Meadowes was the one to summon the sword. We don't know for sure that she was a Gryffindor, however we do know that she was killed by Voldemort himself from Moody. Voldemort was known to distrust even his own Death Eaters. Would he have trusted his own people to bring him the sword after the deaths of the Gideon and Fabian? Also, the sword has only shown up in places it would be useful. I think it "knew" it would be useful in killing the Basilisk and Nagini the horcrux, and therefore appeared to Harry and Neville. I don't think a duel with 5 death eaters would be the most efficient place for a sword. Therefore, I think Voldemort manufactured a situation in which both Dorcas would need the sword to escape and yet could still be killed by Voldemort.
Great dumbledore voice.
Hats and Hedgehogs lol
'HARRYPOTTERDIDYOUPUTYOURNAMEINTHEGOBLETOFFIRE' said Dumbledore calmly.
This is a child's idea of adaptation criticism. It amazes me how so many fans are hung up on this nit pick as if it's the biggest problem in the series.
The fact that Voldemort in the subtitles is Baltimore
and "of ultimart"
Lord Baltimore? I think I just found my new user name.
The fact that you have subtitles on lol..
Vault amor
What if he used a peasant for Ravenclaw's crown to mock her, as it's a crown? Idk, just fussin
Elsa Frost that seems fitting
I can actually see Tom Riddle doing that
OMG OMG OMG
GRIFFINDOR'S HORCRUX IS VOLDEMORT'S NOSE
Danyal Khan OMG 😂😂😂😂😂😂
October 31 1981 eh.......
Voldemort: Trick-or-treat
James: Sorry we’re out of candy
Voldemort: Avada Kedavra!
I think JK agrees that slytherins locket was the hardest, considering it took a WHOLE BOOK to JUST FIND IT
Step 1. Make 7 horcruxes of every day objects.
Step 2. Throw them in a dump
Step 3. Profit
Dallas Dingman Yeah a tiara and a snake are TOTALLY household objects.
@@bobcore224 yeah, they are. Have you not ever heard of royal families and people with pet snakes?
@@bobcore224 don't think that's where they were going with this comment
That’s how Mafia works
Dude, you have to separate them.
This is no question your strongest theory to date, love you guys
And my favorite
And my axe.
naah the veil explained is the best theory ever
I loved that the sword of Gryffindor had the power to absorb things that would make it stronger, and the first thing we know it does is take the venom from Slytherins protector. it always made me think like it was uniting the strengths of the houses under Hogwarts. wonder if its future name will be the sword of Hogwarts, once it gains something from the other two.
Unfortunately not from the Diadem though. Although, if it did destroy the Diadem as well....would you re-name the sword or re-name the school?
@@maryjoyspohrer256 the sword.
Nice Potter puppet pals reference😃
I think being turned into a horcrux would have made the sword stronger because not many things can destroy horcruxes. But does that mean that when Harry kills the Basilisk with the sword, would the venom kill the part of the soul that was in the sword?
Sandra G I think that if voldermort did put his soul in the sword then he'd be truly immortal because the sword takes in whatever makes it stronger so if someone did hit the sword with a basilisk fang it'll only make the sword stronger so I doubt anything will destroy the sword or soul, maybe only another sword equal to it could destroy it
I doubt very much that 1/7 of a dark, shredded soul would make that sword any stronger.
Well, I don’t think the quality or quantity of the soul matters. Horcruxes are practically indestructible objects. As such, there’s a chance that the sword would take in a horcrux. But I’m not convinced it would even be possible. The sword is already a powerful magical object and it’s already impervious to damage. A horcrux might not offer additional strength or protection. Could go either way I guess.
The sword could become a horcrux. If the ring, as a Hallow, could become one, then surely the sword could as well.
Also, i think the venom of the Basilisk could not kill the piece of soul in the sword. A horcrux is destroyed when the container is damaged beyond repair. This is important, because the sword indeed was not damaged from the venom. Therefore the horcrux would live. This leaves the question on if the sword could be destroyed at all. The answer is yes. The sword is made from goblin-forged steel, and like every other metal weapon can be melted down. On top of that, we already know from the diadem that fiendfyre is more than enough to kill a horcrux. So in all, there is a chance the sword could be a horcrux. It does not matter that its a magical item, the ring was as well. The sword's enchanted ability to absorb properties of items it strike would protect the horcrux. And the horcrux in the sword would not be invincible, it could be killed just like all the other ones were.
Any theories on why Bellatrix couldn't have tortured the longbottoms into insanity in a (successful?) attempt to get the sword? Was that not along the timeline?
Megankelly Skies No, that happened after Voldemort's downfall when Bellatrix was trying to find him again.
Megankelly Skies the Longbottom didn't try to fight back or to resist if I'm not mistaken so they couldn't get the sword
The longbottoms would have had to have been cursed before voldemort went after harry. otherwise neville would have never been an option to be the chosen one. we know that voldemort is the one who chose which one it was so neville's parents would have already been "gone". i believe bellatrix was torturing them to get the sword and did obtain it for voldemort. this also explains why she believes it's in her vault because voldemort gave it to her for safe keeping but snape switched them causing the sword in the vault to be a fake
I said she only hid it. But if the Longbottoms weren't already gone, Neville wouldn't be considered a possible chosen one. Since it is cannon that he is, they had to have harmed the Longbottoms before. Harry wasn't like Voldemort until Harry became a hulcrux.
In order for your theory to work, you realise you have to ignore a DIRECT line of dialogue that specifies the Longbottoms were attacked AFTER Voldemort attempted to kill Harry:
"The Longbottoms were popular. The attacks on them came after Voldemort's fall from power, just when everyone thought they were safe."
-Dumbledore
BOOM, theory disproven. Coming from Dumbledore himself, the Longbottoms were NOT attacked until after Voldemort had already chosen Harry as his rival and fallen from power. Therefore, that CANNOT be when Voldemort got his hands on the sword.
Also, all the prophecy actually says is that the Chosen One's parents "thrice defied Voldemort". It's entirely possible that ANY member of the Order has defied Voldemort at least three times.
I mean, define "defy Voldemort". Even BEING in the Order could count. Prophecies are vague like that. It's actually made fun of on the wikipedia page for the prophecy; technically, it could just mean that he asked someone for a favour three times in a row and they said no each time. There's ZERO clear definition, and it's highly likely that Harry and Neville weren't the ONLY candidates who fit the prophecy.
Come on. At least make sure your theories can't be instantly disproven by googling the timeline and clicking on ONE link.
I wonder if the sword would absorb the elder wand if they came into contact. I always thought sword wands should be a thing.
Kind of cool, but I think that Hagrid's umbrella wand is more practical.
anybody else curious if a love potion would work on voldemort since he was created out of one and therefor isnt able to love?
Yes. Yes I am curious about that.
But does this mean that he still completed in having something from all 4 houses sence harry was in gryffindor?
technically yes, but he never knew. (and it turned out to be his own folly because it allowed Harry to have a second chance -combine with his mom's protection)
No, Voldemort meant to divide his soul into seven pieces, not make seven horcruxes. The seventh piece of his souls was to remain with him. Harry was inadvertently made into a horcrux and, unknown to Voldemort, his soul was now in eight pieces, not the magical number of seven.
Scott Archer Thank you, that's what I was going to say.
Joey Peterson Nagini wasn't the snake in the zoo
if I'm not mistaken the snake in the zoo was brazilian while Nagini was albanian
Lucas Vasconcelos I thought that this was stated by Rowling herself? That Nagini is the snake...
Afaik voldemort made the nagini horkrux AFTER he was revived in book 4. Your point is wrong imo and SCB are right
Fusel so the snake traveled from London to a forest in Albania? how did the snake manage to do that?
A piece of my soul would make the sword way stronger! Have you seen how powerful the diary became?
Bruh weakling
Darling is bad for your soul. Sorry to say this 🥺
It was mentioned in another one of your Harry Potter videos that you should read the Percy Jackson books and do videos on them. I think you should as well, I enjoyed them as much as Harry Potter.
I believe there are 17 main books out now that take place in that "universe" and who knows how many there will be.
Percy Jackson and the Olympians (5 books)
The Kane Chronicles (3 books)
The Heroes of Olympus (5 books)
Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard (3? books) I just read that this series is done, I haven't finished book 3 yet so I don't know based on the little reading I have done to put this list together.
The Trials of Apollo (2 books out as of now)(5 books may be planned?)
Then there are a few "side/short" stories and reference guides and such as well.
I think this is the correct order in witch the sets were released and the order I (as well as everyone else that picked them up as they released) read them.
zeroraptor That would be awesome, I'd love someone to do theory videos on those!
There's a lot of theorys for it
That would be interesting, although I have to tell you, I think he is planning on having the Magnus Chase series go for 5 books as well.
That would be awesome. Didnt do much more then look up the series names to make sure i had them correct and the tidbit about Magnus Chase caught my eye, didn't look into it beyond that.
understood
Hi I hope you have a lovely day / night! 😋
Thanks... but I won't... :'(
Thanks but that won't happen
Go fuck yourself
i would have made the invisibility cloak a horcrux
Dumbledore had the invisibility cloak at the time
cosmic spooky
smart
cosmic spooky
The cloak did not have a connection to Voldemort's family or to the founders. Voldemort might have used it had he known it was a Deathly Hallow, but he did not.
i didn't say voldemort should have, i said i would have
I allways though that voldemort didn't know the deathly hallows. he only knew of the elder wand.
You should bring back the “these socks are amazing”