A little bit of time spent cleaning up before mixing pays huge dividends as you get farther into your project🎛 Catch more tips for a pro mix by subscribing to our channel!
Thank you Sweetwater (and Mitch) for this video. I like the approach of addressing workflow at a not too technical level. If I need more detail I can always deep dive on my own. Keep up the good work. I really do appreciate it.
Thanks, Mitch! I have done all of these methods while doubting myself the entire time, so this video was a great validation of my intincts and a confidence booster. Excellent tutorial on drum editing.
This is all old stuff to me, but Mitch, you did a GREAT job of explaining not only how to clean up your tracks before mixing, but WHY you're doing it! The "WHY" is something that often gets overlooked in some explanations of different parts of the recording/mixing process. And "cleaning up" is so much easier now than it was in the days of analog!
I'd love to see what exactly you do to de-hum, de-noise, de-plosive etc. etc. tracks - preferably vocals. That's the part of "mixing" or editing that I have been sleeping on most. I do have RX7, but I always feel like de-XXing things really changes the sound and feeling of the vocals. It helps in some ways, but it's destructive in others and I don't like that.
Get it right at the source and that won't be an issue. Grab a Kaotica Eyeball and that should help with what you've got going on as far as background noise and plosives. Otherwise, mic technique when recording. It's not as technical as you're making it, you shouldn't need to destroy a track with de-xx when you're processing.
This is so much valuable informationabout where the personai preferences may be hence liberating as much as being educational. Thank you as always!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🧿👋🏼
Thanks for watching! For many functions in Pro Tools, if you hold Option (Mac) or Alt (Windows) while selecting or changing something, it will be applied across all tracks. Hope this helps, Mitch
I think I'm misunderstanding something on the high hat bleed. I get that there was bleed during the recording process. But there shouldn't be bleed between the tracks in the DAW, correct? So, how would the other tracks that contain the high hat bleed be affected by EQ that's only directly applied to the high hat track? What am I missing here?
Great question! You are correct that there is no longer bleed among the tracks that are in the DAW once they are recorded. The problem is, say we look at a tom track... Say it has significant bleed from the hi-hat captured during recording. If we boost the treble on that tom track, the hi-hat bleed recorded on that track will also have its high end boosted. Now, when we play back, the hi-hat will seem brighter, because we’ve EQ’d the bleed in the tom track - but we haven’t EQ’d the hi-hat itself. In other words, both the tom and the hi-hat are on the same track (to a certain extent) because of the bleed. If we EQ that track, everything on it will be EQ’d, including the bleed captured on that track, which can throw off the overall EQ. Hope this helps, Mitch
A little bit of time spent cleaning up before mixing pays huge dividends as you get farther into your project🎛 Catch more tips for a pro mix by subscribing to our channel!
This is like getting a free education in audio engineering at it's finest!
I didn't even have to pay a tuition fee.
Thank you Sweetwater!
Thank you Sweetwater (and Mitch) for this video. I like the approach of addressing workflow at a not too technical level. If I need more detail I can always deep dive on my own. Keep up the good work. I really do appreciate it.
😊👍
Thanks, Mitch! I have done all of these methods while doubting myself the entire time, so this video was a great validation of my intincts and a confidence booster. Excellent tutorial on drum editing.
This is all old stuff to me, but Mitch, you did a GREAT job of explaining not only how to clean up your tracks before mixing, but WHY you're doing it! The "WHY" is something that often gets overlooked in some explanations of different parts of the recording/mixing process. And "cleaning up" is so much easier now than it was in the days of analog!
I'd love to see what exactly you do to de-hum, de-noise, de-plosive etc. etc. tracks - preferably vocals. That's the part of "mixing" or editing that I have been sleeping on most. I do have RX7, but I always feel like de-XXing things really changes the sound and feeling of the vocals. It helps in some ways, but it's destructive in others and I don't like that.
Get it right at the source and that won't be an issue. Grab a Kaotica Eyeball and that should help with what you've got going on as far as background noise and plosives. Otherwise, mic technique when recording. It's not as technical as you're making it, you shouldn't need to destroy a track with de-xx when you're processing.
Look into Steinberg Spectralayers
Good demonstration, Chuck. Very important details.
I remember this 20 years ago with protools.
And
I am so happy with my tape style workflow now
Any job instantly becomes more enjoyable with a Marshall fridge in the office 🧊🍺😉🤙🧊
Great video and tips Mitch ✌️😎👍
pls do a video on vocal mixing..
This is so much valuable informationabout where the personai preferences may be hence liberating as much as being educational. Thank you as always!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🧿👋🏼
Great information and perfect timing! Cheers
Thank you sir :)
thnx
Cheers
How can I switch the playlists on all tracks at once??
Thanks for watching! For many functions in Pro Tools, if you hold Option (Mac) or Alt (Windows) while selecting or changing something, it will be applied across all tracks.
Hope this helps,
Mitch
@@sweetwater thanks! Really appreciate it!
Key step
I think I'm misunderstanding something on the high hat bleed.
I get that there was bleed during the recording process. But there shouldn't be bleed between the tracks in the DAW, correct? So, how would the other tracks that contain the high hat bleed be affected by EQ that's only directly applied to the high hat track? What am I missing here?
Great question! You are correct that there is no longer bleed among the tracks that are in the DAW once they are recorded. The problem is, say we look at a tom track... Say it has significant bleed from the hi-hat captured during recording. If we boost the treble on that tom track, the hi-hat bleed recorded on that track will also have its high end boosted. Now, when we play back, the hi-hat will seem brighter, because we’ve EQ’d the bleed in the tom track - but we haven’t EQ’d the hi-hat itself. In other words, both the tom and the hi-hat are on the same track (to a certain extent) because of the bleed. If we EQ that track, everything on it will be EQ’d, including the bleed captured on that track, which can throw off the overall EQ.
Hope this helps,
Mitch
@@sweetwater well, duh on me. I get it now. I was thinking only of the single high hat track.
Once again, Sweetwater Mitch Rocks. :)
Use 🎧