Because, while one board thinks they're losing control of World Cricket administrationlike they once did, the other board doesn't have money or make money from cricket because nobody wants to visit a terrorist country, to watch cricket!
Sports people complain that the sport is dying coz of no money. Then a measure is created to attract money. Now sports people complain that money is ruining the sport. Go figure!
International cricket shld not have monopoly on players' time... When sehwag and Sachin were playing for india, any other opening batsman in India above 20 yrs can be sure that they won't be able to play for india for atleast either one of them retires. But now even though gill and Rohit pretty much seal the opening spot of World Cup, still there are 20 job opportunities for opening batsman in IPL alone. This is the way frwd for this sport
@@akshatsingh1646its still about the sport winning the world cup or champions trophy or scoring for your country is still valued more than playing for a franchise.
If IPL like tournament were in Australia or England, these same experts would defend it calling it evolution of game crossing borders and nations. Freedom of players to choose their career, and critics with same arguments would be called as hyper nationalists. The real pain is they are not part of money made in IPL.
Stop avoiding the blame. The quality of the game over the increase of entertainment is to the detriment of the game. The pitches are totally dead. Smaller boundaries, etc.
There's absolutely no way. In Australia there's no way people would ever care about a domestic league more than international cricket. Fans inside Australia would be the most vocal against domestic leagues interfering with the their own internationals out of anyone. There's too much national pride.
Facts the ipl has been great for smaller market players who can actually earn a living from the sport. These guys are just bitter because the power balance has shifted. T20 is the best thing to happen to cricket especially from a players perspective
@@janga75 Not everything is black and white. There is harm and there is also good. That is a plus of league and domestic games that it promotes more local players. The point is not that tho. The point is that the level of the game has come down severely every passing year. The pitches are more dead. It has become a batsmen's game. Can you compare this cricket to 90s and 2000s cricket?
They are not bashing IPL they are bashing the system like boult is playing BBL while newzealand strugling abd narine etc have given up contracts for these leagues skipped world cups
@@AdityaKumar-oe9yr It's not just the UK's problem, it is the problem of other countries which he referred to including West Indies and New Zealand. Many Indians have criticised the IPL too.
Because the IPL franchises are starting to expand to other leagues. The ‘knight riders’ franchise have teams in South Africa, India, USA and West Indies. Do you want world cricket to be dominated by a few rich Indian businessman ?
"Private money taking control..." Where does he think these international boards were getting money all these years. Which government was financing cricket till now using public money
The thing cricket is non existent sport outside of Indian subcontinent. If UK can run EPL, the richest sporting league. They can easily create IPL kind of brand. But there is no interest for cricket in UK.
The problem is not ipl, the problem is how players view the fundamental spirit of the game. Despite ipl the world test championship has created the most competetive Indian test team possibly ever in the history of the game - because money isnt everything if the players have the spirit of the game. As for smaller nations, best example are teams like afghanistan or netherlands as we saw during the odi world cup. More nations are joining cricket and taking it seriously as a modern sport all because of t20. They excel beyond expectaions because they have the thirst of victory and embody the spirit of competetiveness. If this has decayed within traditional bastions like west indies then it is a commentary on their systems of cricket administration rather than the format of t20. Change is inevitable but those with sound fundamental values can survive any change...
There is literally no future of cricket without the IPL and T20. What I like and what you like is irrelevant to what the people like. ODI is a dying format and the future of cricket is private leagues (like football). Adapt or perish.
These people always have a holier than thou approach regarding cricket. There's always a caveat involved in their compliment. And according to them the bygone era was better when players had absolutely no control over how much money they can make and the only place to be a professional was England and after a grueling season players were paid peanuts. I'm glad we're out of that era, if the game won't have money how will you get more nations to play it? Ask this question to Mr Einstein in the video.
Cricket has been considered a "gentleman 's game" but that is not necessarily a compliment (although some do). It was elitist game designed for the leisure of few. I think the problem with them complaining about T20 and money in general is that they feel that they are loosing the "exclusivity" to the masses. I always consider people complaining about Test cricket dying as a sign of insecurity of the elites and an idea deeply rooted in colonialism. P.S. Football was always considered a game for the masses hence there isn't such a strong reaction to its commercialisation
@@thyikmnnnn actually Bgt and ashes this two is interesting other are really boring where in t20 every game is interesting underdog team can defeat strong team in test that has no chance.
Why is it always old men from England complaining about T20? Nobody cares about your County Championship, they want to watch IPL and Big Bash. There's plenty money around to maintain Test cricket, all nations play Test cricket, players want to play Test cricket but it has to fit in with the new reality.
Bi laterals are not of waste time.. i think league and country level cricket can both survive. And it will till the time BCCI has the most amount of money. But with countries like Saudi Arabia, who are literally throwing money at players. Then even Indian players will start going there to sign and play in their future cricket league.
Cricket is different from football our league only have 2 month duration So one player can play multiple league so even with USA and saudi coming in cricket Team with local viewership will dominate the game.
They are just jealous because the Hundred failed to generate what they expected,btw IPL has put cricket leagues on the map. And India has been a major performer in Test arena which shows our balance,still they keep playing the final of WTC in England to prevent India from getting that trophy.
2 IPLs a year would be counterproductive because people would eventually get bored of its repetitive nature. Cricket needs diverse formats including Test, T20, International and franchise with the right balance. But of course, cocksuckers of capitalism such as yourself wouldn't understand the significance of that.
here's a hard fact test lovers won't accept, as good as test is, It's like that arthouse film which won't even recover budget sometimes, One day is more like mid budget film, which makes decent profit. t20 is the commercial movies which keeps studios alive and give actors bread to eat and roof over their head. How many new people would get thrilled with a game that takes 5 days of their week, very few. T20 is money, Now it's upto ICC to create a balanced schedule where, Leagues and international games don't collide, much like football
That's what we wanted to hear 😅😅😅 There was a time when we have been rejected to give two extra tickets for our final match in ODI WORLD CUP 1983. My BHARAT 🇮🇳 OUR BHARAT 🇮🇳 IS OFFICIALLY THE ULTIMATE KING 🤴 NOW Not only in cricket but in all other sectors too INDIA is giving about 75% of total revenue of ICC to help other boards. Do your so called developed countries has done anything like that. The answer is NO And they eventually can't because now we are the Boss...
Spoken like a true stuffy Brit. Players earning for retirement, no. Players able to afford a better life, no. Like any industry, the best talent goes where's there's the best return.
All those people crying out loud (including the guy in the video), if the sport isn’t willing to change it will die. No one wants to watch a test cricket, no has the time to constantly stay invested for each ball for 3-5 days. T20 the faster format is what intices people and that’s what the number says.
@@35lpmnot true. Test cricket unfolds slowly but that makes for a more interesting match. It is not just about hitting 6s. When a 6 is hit every over it is predictable and boring.
In my opinion test cricket popular only in England, Australia and perhaps in INDIA course they have long cricket culture. Just look at Ashes 2023 highlights u will know. But attracting new cricket fans, T20 cricket is the only option.
He’s basically saying India has become the biggest money maker in cricket and obviously has larger control over the game and that’s not good for the came. It will be great if it was England or at least any other white country. Mellow racism y’all!
T20 was meant to be entertainment rather than pure cricketing battle. It was meant to bring in money and fame. And boy it succeeded in that. I agree that focus should be to keep red ball cricket alive, which is actually what cricket is. But you gotta have money for that. The only reason cricket is catching up in USA, Canada, UAE and so many other countries is because of the money involved.
The fan following in test matches of india are equally good. The fact that if your country is playing good cricket, every format is watched. Indians still consider twst cricket as top of the industry.
New fans in 2024 are not going to get into a sport where a match lasts several days and even going to watch lasts for an entire day. Every other major sport can be viewed from start to finish within a couple of hours. Personally I like test cricket but I’m not blind to the fact that it’s not the future of the sport. T20 is the best thing to ever happen to cricket.
He's right on spot with the observation. But I think the conclusion is to impose stricter financial regulations. Cricket will grow bigger with or without such regulations. But we as a cricket community are at such a point in this beautiful game's life that if we desire, we can make it extremely inclusive with many countries taking part. T20 is the key to it and if proper financial regulations are imposed to aim wider audience and sources of investment (as opposed to concentrated sources of investment), it can go a long way.❤
The truth is that cricket can't spread its wings via test cricket..Also not that many want to watch bilateral white ball internationals, especially 50 over ODI's. Further ,the IPL will expand a lot more and will be longer than 2 months and have more teams down the line. So,the international game will comprise tests and the 20 over world cup every two years. Bilaterals will be more like friendlies or stuff that Association nations play.
Don't blame T20 and IPL for gross mismanagement by the WI cricket boards and NZ cricket board. WI cricket has been in decline since 90's, well before either T20 or IPL was even thought of. It's become fashionable to blame everything on IPL.
Cricket is a convenience for India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka. It is basically a game of skill and a minimum level of fitness is required. Even Inzamam ul Haq and Rohit Sharma types have become world champions scoring tons, with their level of fitness. If you can't bowl fast go for spin, running between the wickets in your own timing. In batting ball comes to you. Opponent never stretches you in Speed, stamina and fitness. It is never neck to neck fight in skill, speed, stamina, and fitness. Whereas in games like Soccer, hockey, basketball, tennis, rugby,track and field it requires enormous amount of speed, stamina, fitness and skill. Opponent stretches you in all these parameters. To beat Bolt you have to be like him in not only skill, but you have to be more in Speed, stamina and fitness, than him. So is with Maradona, Ronaldo, Phelps, Michael Jackson Nadal, Djokovic etc. People from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka etc play cricket out of convenience. This is the reason even though soccer, basketball and other games are popular in Europe and US, but there also people from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka etc settled for generations, play cricket only. These countries have made this lazy game their religion and are zero in all the other games which require speed, stamina, and fitness. British don't pride in cricket, they are soccer gaints. So are Australia, South Africa, New Zealand etc They are world class in soccer, rugby, track and field, swimming etc. If we combine cricket playing population of India , it is going to be even more than the population of Australia, England, South Africa etc combined, then also are not dominant. Cannot produce heros in games requiring speed, stamina and fitness, India Pakistan Bangladesh Srilanka etc try to search heros in lazy game of cricket. You talk of Bolt, they will bring cricketer to compare, You talk of Pele they will talk of cricketer, you talk of Nadal and Federer they will talk of cricketer. You talk of Michael Jordan they will talk of cricketer. Cannot rise in tough games, Indians have become ambassador of the lazy game of cricket, Cricket mad nation can never be sporting nation. It's an attitude. Japan and Korea wants to compete with top developed nations and make their presence felt be it technology, economy and games. Today they are among top world class footballers alongside European giants. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka are vying amongst themselves in a lazy game cricket and totally zero in games requiring speed,, stamina and fitness.
Now Williamson too.. People who keep telling this is just UK media having a grudge against BCCI are just either ignorant or are idiots who don't understand the effects of this franchise model
Some of these english guys are just salty that they couldn't commercialise a format they came up with. Else why would someone complain about the game and players making more money. If some players choose money over International matches new players will get picked to represent the country. The circle will move on.
Until & unless domestic cricket is not considered as bread & butter by national administrators & they don't try to monetise it, they'll never be able to get sufficient traction for their national teams. Its exactly how local administrative bodies for cities & towns should be empowered to have balanced growth & development of a province or a state. No amount of international bilaterals are going to make the game relevant, it will only lead to loss of interest globally because national pride becomes the fuel for interest in something as elementary as sports.
IPL was the first proper league, it's thlse who came after that have saturated the sport with mediocrity😂 stop that shitty 100 if you're so concerned, no one even watches that.
The games done and dusted. International cricket is finished. Keep playing that ipl or other t20 leagues. The excitement that it had before is done. Cricket is done. Watch football instead better sport anyways
Here’s the cold hard truth if you can’t finish the game in 2-3 hours it’s a shit game. Can’t make aggressive plays and there is no drama. I used to hate watching long form cricket with my dad. Now we can sit down have glass of scotch and finish a game together
Cricket will become like football for good. No silly bilateral series, they should have 1 worldcup every 4 years and then just t20 premiere leagues around world, odi and tests should be phased out slowly as they are not suited for this generation only for grey hair men. Stars like kohli rebooted charm of tests and it also resulted in ashes gaining popularity with virat no longer being the captain tests will also die soon and so called ashes will also die once players sign up to multiple premiere leagues around world, it takes a little longer until all grey hair men are gone from admin and private money takes over icc and bcci.
When soccor and baseball etc can have private club team why not Cricket its not an absolutely new trend or unheard of in sporting. Just a biased baseless opinion and who is watching a 5 day test its a dead form too slow just adapt
Trent Boult is, unfortunately, at the end of his career. I am glad he has made himself available for the T20WC but i doubt his effectiveness. He has lost 10-20 klicks and it shows in the most recent BBL and IPL series. Tours are a good opportunity to test younger talent.
Cricket = India ....India = Cricket ...India = Money....Money = Players...Players = India + Money 💰 🤑 💸...India + Money = Cricketers lifestyle = Cricketers wives + Girlfriends + Kids Future + Parents life style = India 🇮🇳 = Power = Cricket = Your jobs = India + Money ....Figure it out or have you figured it out? 😊😀😀
why should the market be controlled by a board ? It makes no sense for cricket if all boards kept running same old boring series. these private leagues have transformed the sport. you are just mad ashes is not the biggest anticipated cricket event anymore. Mad that cricket went from elite club sport to a team sport where private players can build elite teams and have the best experience for all fans not just members.
A Players value in franchise cricket come 4m the nation it represents atleast in initial days till they establish their position as players in franchise. A players national identity comes when they come up with the attitude n mindset and training of that national cricket environment, so nations playing vital role here. Now the more n more franchise cricket get popular, we gonna see less of International n bilateral matches but this rarity will give boast to International matches because let's be honest ppl love when national identity fights. It's just pick your players talent wise not popularity wise have control over them, and most importantly don't cry about it rather do marketing on it as if you are representing Nations..
Let the paying public choose test mach is not free to watch ..let thr e.players and public decide not some commentator who lives off cricket and never played the game
The English are such hypocrites. They absolutely love the Barclays premier league but has issues with IPL. Stop this double standard mindset.
Notice how only people complaining about ipl are from uk and Pakistan
Coz one is the master and other one is the lapdog
Because, while one board thinks they're losing control of World Cricket administrationlike they once did, the other board doesn't have money or make money from cricket because nobody wants to visit a terrorist country, to watch cricket!
The UK is about to become a Pakistan, the way things are going 😂.
I'm 100 and 100% sure he wouldn't have said that if IPL was owned and run by British administrators 😶
Sports people complain that the sport is dying coz of no money. Then a measure is created to attract money. Now sports people complain that money is ruining the sport. Go figure!
It should be about sport not money like it is a serious problem ppl leaving central contracts ab deviliers suni naraine etc now trent boult
International cricket shld not have monopoly on players' time...
When sehwag and Sachin were playing for india, any other opening batsman in India above 20 yrs can be sure that they won't be able to play for india for atleast either one of them retires.
But now even though gill and Rohit pretty much seal the opening spot of World Cup, still there are 20 job opportunities for opening batsman in IPL alone. This is the way frwd for this sport
@@akshatsingh1646players are not the state’s property.
@@akshatsingh1646its still about the sport winning the world cup or champions trophy or scoring for your country is still valued more than playing for a franchise.
They are just hypocrites and hates India
What the hell is The Hundred? ECB is corrupting the game of cricket. Can we talk about that?
If IPL like tournament were in Australia or England, these same experts would defend it calling it evolution of game crossing borders and nations. Freedom of players to choose their career, and critics with same arguments would be called as hyper nationalists. The real pain is they are not part of money made in IPL.
Stop avoiding the blame. The quality of the game over the increase of entertainment is to the detriment of the game.
The pitches are totally dead. Smaller boundaries, etc.
There's absolutely no way. In Australia there's no way people would ever care about a domestic league more than international cricket. Fans inside Australia would be the most vocal against domestic leagues interfering with the their own internationals out of anyone. There's too much national pride.
Facts the ipl has been great for smaller market players who can actually earn a living from the sport. These guys are just bitter because the power balance has shifted. T20 is the best thing to happen to cricket especially from a players perspective
@@janga75 Not everything is black and white. There is harm and there is also good. That is a plus of league and domestic games that it promotes more local players.
The point is not that tho.
The point is that the level of the game has come down severely every passing year. The pitches are more dead. It has become a batsmen's game. Can you compare this cricket to 90s and 2000s cricket?
@ARandomGuy24 dude I have seen more celebration of a footy city team winning than aussi winning cricket worldcup
Uk media will always bash IPL. no ipl meams no cricket.
They are not bashing IPL they are bashing the system like boult is playing BBL while newzealand strugling abd narine etc have given up contracts for these leagues skipped world cups
@@akshatsingh1646their problem.
@@AdityaKumar-oe9yr It's not just the UK's problem, it is the problem of other countries which he referred to including West Indies and New Zealand.
Many Indians have criticised the IPL too.
he is playing the wc all the wc@@akshatsingh1646
Test cricket is real cricket, ipl is bullshit fixing
Why ipl😂😂, why not bbl, 100, Psl and many other leagues around the world
Sour grapes
Because the IPL franchises are starting to expand to other leagues. The ‘knight riders’ franchise have teams in South Africa, India, USA and West Indies. Do you want world cricket to be dominated by a few rich Indian businessman ?
The title is inaccurate. He is talking about other leagues in other countries. Not IPL.
@@thyikmnnnn Yes. I would love that.
He didn’t even mention the IPL though… it’s on the caption but this guy did not say shit
The only problem that guys like him have is that cricket has gone from a quite elitist sport to a much more democratic one.
What democracy ? You aren't a good cricketer if u can't play 5 days
What democratic.....BCCI stops cricket to be played in Olympics....cricket popularity is declining
@@adrishbasu1644 I said the same thing.
@@mmn___5756 Get on youtube after happy hours.
@@mmn___5756 Cricket has been included in the Olympics. What are you talking about?
As long as England and Australia were calling the shots everything was dandy
Well it was. The game had credibility. When you watched a match it was fair. Now you don't know whether it's fixed or not.
@@nickhanlon9331 fair really? thats wny murlidharan was banned
@@utubetruthteller Well they can't accept it but T20 is the future
You are Just jealous go get your ass chilled ...@@nickhanlon9331
@@nickhanlon9331 you wear Clown 🤡 outfit to work
"Private money taking control..." Where does he think these international boards were getting money all these years. Which government was financing cricket till now using public money
All this talk of nation first goes out of the way when feeding your family comes up
Are you saying players can’t feed their families playing for their country??? Just stfu 😑
Whitey big mad he doesn't get to run things anymore.
The thing cricket is non existent sport outside of Indian subcontinent. If UK can run EPL, the richest sporting league. They can easily create IPL kind of brand. But there is no interest for cricket in UK.
No they cant@@itsmeitoldyouthat1448
Browney still hasn’t developed enough IQ to understand what he’s saying makes sense
@@itsmeitoldyouthat1448not quite
@@itsmeitoldyouthat1448then why aren't they doing it?
The problem is not ipl, the problem is how players view the fundamental spirit of the game. Despite ipl the world test championship has created the most competetive Indian test team possibly ever in the history of the game - because money isnt everything if the players have the spirit of the game.
As for smaller nations, best example are teams like afghanistan or netherlands as we saw during the odi world cup. More nations are joining cricket and taking it seriously as a modern sport all because of t20. They excel beyond expectaions because they have the thirst of victory and embody the spirit of competetiveness. If this has decayed within traditional bastions like west indies then it is a commentary on their systems of cricket administration rather than the format of t20. Change is inevitable but those with sound fundamental values can survive any change...
Fantastic outlook on the changing landscape of cricket.
There is literally no future of cricket without the IPL and T20.
What I like and what you like is irrelevant to what the people like.
ODI is a dying format and the future of cricket is private leagues (like football).
Adapt or perish.
Would this gentleman work for a 100 year old newspaper which is about to shut down "to save it"and resign from Wisden and that too at a lower salary?
If test cricket fall cricket is done
@@user-sk7js5hn3r as long as bcci gives importance test cricket i think we are good.
@@user-sk7js5hn3r
It would never fall, but I can't say about odi
These people always have a holier than thou approach regarding cricket. There's always a caveat involved in their compliment. And according to them the bygone era was better when players had absolutely no control over how much money they can make and the only place to be a professional was England and after a grueling season players were paid peanuts. I'm glad we're out of that era, if the game won't have money how will you get more nations to play it? Ask this question to Mr Einstein in the video.
Say it louder for those in the back. Players have options now and that is great for the game and the players
Once upon a time England and Australia controlled the game.Not any more.Cry as much as you want.
Just because ipl is not europian or europian colonial it is bad.
International football has already gone to hell will you stop EPL to save it???
Cricket has been considered a "gentleman 's game" but that is not necessarily a compliment (although some do). It was elitist game designed for the leisure of few. I think the problem with them complaining about T20 and money in general is that they feel that they are loosing the "exclusivity" to the masses. I always consider people complaining about Test cricket dying as a sign of insecurity of the elites and an idea deeply rooted in colonialism.
P.S. Football was always considered a game for the masses hence there isn't such a strong reaction to its commercialisation
Or maybe test cricket is a more interesting spectacle than T20 ?
@@thyikmnnnn actually Bgt and ashes this two is interesting other are really boring where in t20 every game is interesting underdog team can defeat strong team in test that has no chance.
@@thyikmnnnnodi is dying not test. The Anglo sphere of cricket has been challenged and people like you are insecure cry more.
Bro curb your psychoanalysis 💀
@@AnimeAnalysisAceyou should stick to anime,kid
He is Just Salty. .... That His Country did not take over the Game.. 😂😂😂😂
Why is it always old men from England complaining about T20? Nobody cares about your County Championship, they want to watch IPL and Big Bash. There's plenty money around to maintain Test cricket, all nations play Test cricket, players want to play Test cricket but it has to fit in with the new reality.
Future is t20 not test
T20 can bring new fans to games if people were gonnan be more interested than they will surely watch odi or test cricket
Cricket is headed the American league’s way or professional football, and that’s a good thing, bi-laterals are so meaningless and a waste of time
Bi laterals are not of waste time.. i think league and country level cricket can both survive. And it will till the time BCCI has the most amount of money. But with countries like Saudi Arabia, who are literally throwing money at players. Then even Indian players will start going there to sign and play in their future cricket league.
Cricket is different from football our league only have 2 month duration
So one player can play multiple league so even with USA and saudi coming in cricket
Team with local viewership will dominate the game.
@@harshitakhandelwal1879indian players aren't allowed to play in any other frachise than the IPL.
You mean the Ashes?
MORAL VICTORY
19 November
They are just jealous because the Hundred failed to generate what they expected,btw IPL has put cricket leagues on the map.
And India has been a major performer in Test arena which shows our balance,still they keep playing the final of WTC in England to prevent India from getting that trophy.
Funny, must have forgotten all those WTC finals that England qualified for
19 November 😂
Let me guess because of T20, cricket isn't in your control now.😂
Cut the BS and run 2 IPLs a year . Don’t waste our time with moral lectures and romanticisation of history. Capitalism it is .
2 IPLs a year would be counterproductive because people would eventually get bored of its repetitive nature. Cricket needs diverse formats including Test, T20, International and franchise with the right balance. But of course, cocksuckers of capitalism such as yourself wouldn't understand the significance of that.
Condition of Cricket teaches you lot about economics; which economic system is failing and which economic system should be there for common good.
here's a hard fact test lovers won't accept, as good as test is, It's like that arthouse film which won't even recover budget sometimes, One day is more like mid budget film, which makes decent profit. t20 is the commercial movies which keeps studios alive and give actors bread to eat and roof over their head. How many new people would get thrilled with a game that takes 5 days of their week, very few. T20 is money, Now it's upto ICC to create a balanced schedule where, Leagues and international games don't collide, much like football
Test matches used to have big crowds but not anymore I think
@@nikhilhembrom8952 If cricket wants to go in newer territories t20 is the only game it can go through
That's what we wanted to hear 😅😅😅
There was a time when we have been rejected to give two extra tickets for our final match in ODI WORLD CUP 1983.
My BHARAT 🇮🇳
OUR BHARAT 🇮🇳
IS OFFICIALLY THE ULTIMATE KING 🤴 NOW
Not only in cricket but in all other sectors too
INDIA is giving about 75% of total revenue of ICC to help other boards. Do your so called developed countries has done anything like that.
The answer is NO
And they eventually can't because now we are the Boss...
It hurts them cause they nit the pallbearers of all this riches 😂
Spoken like a true stuffy Brit. Players earning for retirement, no. Players able to afford a better life, no. Like any industry, the best talent goes where's there's the best return.
Yes, because the game was in a wonderful place with the boards in power.
*🕉️ 🚩 🇮🇳 INDIA 🇮🇳 🚩 🕉️*
No one has 5 days to watch test cricket, his analysis is nonsensical. Further, thete is no allowing or disallowing market forces in capitalism.
All those people crying out loud (including the guy in the video), if the sport isn’t willing to change it will die. No one wants to watch a test cricket, no has the time to constantly stay invested for each ball for 3-5 days. T20 the faster format is what intices people and that’s what the number says.
Who the hell watches test cricket
Do u have the same opinion about English Premier league? Just wondering
Test cricket is boring Nobody can give 5 days of life to a cricket game nowadays impossible
Its more intresting than t20
T20 is boring.
@@akshatsingh1646 😂😂 1 match out of 10 test match is only interesting and though only 5th day of the game.
@@35lpmnot true. Test cricket unfolds slowly but that makes for a more interesting match. It is not just about hitting 6s. When a 6 is hit every over it is predictable and boring.
In my opinion test cricket popular only in England, Australia and perhaps in INDIA course they have long cricket culture. Just look at Ashes 2023 highlights u will know. But attracting new cricket fans, T20 cricket is the only option.
If "Weak broke men will always hate on successful men" was a video 🤡🤡🤡
Test cricket was already dead . You cant make people watch something unless they want to , no matter how much you push something
It's amazing how he didn't say this in 2022 when England won the world cup but now when English cricket is in the dumps
Check the date - England were T20 champions at the time
He didn't say anything about the IPL. He is speaking, more generally, about the franchise Cricket.
Cry abt it
So T20 made the sport more exciting and infused more money. What his point then? I think his problem is how come “we” dont control the game anymore? 😂
The truth also is apart from the Ashes, 5 day test cricket is for the most part boring, and almost seems outdated now.
He’s basically saying India has become the biggest money maker in cricket and obviously has larger control over the game and that’s not good for the came. It will be great if it was England or at least any other white country. Mellow racism y’all!
So jealous of IPL. How can a country like India, which we butchered and maimed for 200 years, stand up and do so well.
Everyone knew this will happen, i don't know why people are surprised.
T20 was meant to be entertainment rather than pure cricketing battle. It was meant to bring in money and fame. And boy it succeeded in that.
I agree that focus should be to keep red ball cricket alive, which is actually what cricket is. But you gotta have money for that.
The only reason cricket is catching up in USA, Canada, UAE and so many other countries is because of the money involved.
These guys would be singing a different tune if IPL were an English or an Australian league.
The fan following in test matches of india are equally good. The fact that if your country is playing good cricket, every format is watched.
Indians still consider twst cricket as top of the industry.
New fans in 2024 are not going to get into a sport where a match lasts several days and even going to watch lasts for an entire day.
Every other major sport can be viewed from start to finish within a couple of hours. Personally I like test cricket but I’m not blind to the fact that it’s not the future of the sport. T20 is the best thing to ever happen to cricket.
Same in football. Why cry? Game has survived. Evolved
Almost every one who is not getting a perk 💰 directly or indirectly from good league cricket is crying one way or another
He's right on spot with the observation. But I think the conclusion is to impose stricter financial regulations.
Cricket will grow bigger with or without such regulations. But we as a cricket community are at such a point in this beautiful game's life that if we desire, we can make it extremely inclusive with many countries taking part. T20 is the key to it and if proper financial regulations are imposed to aim wider audience and sources of investment (as opposed to concentrated sources of investment), it can go a long way.❤
The truth is that cricket can't spread its wings via test cricket..Also not that many want to watch bilateral white ball internationals, especially 50 over ODI's.
Further ,the IPL will expand a lot more and will be longer than 2 months and have more teams down the line.
So,the international game will comprise tests and the 20 over world cup every two years. Bilaterals will be more like friendlies or stuff that Association nations play.
Feel like people should be thanking Alan Stanford really
Don't blame T20 and IPL for gross mismanagement by the WI cricket boards and NZ cricket board.
WI cricket has been in decline since 90's, well before either T20 or IPL was even thought of.
It's become fashionable to blame everything on IPL.
Cricket is a convenience for India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka. It is basically a game of skill and a minimum level of fitness is required. Even Inzamam ul Haq and Rohit Sharma types have become world champions scoring tons, with their level of fitness. If you can't bowl fast go for spin, running between the wickets in your own timing. In batting ball comes to you. Opponent never stretches you in Speed, stamina and fitness. It is never neck to neck fight in skill, speed, stamina, and fitness. Whereas in games like Soccer, hockey, basketball, tennis, rugby,track and field it requires enormous amount of speed, stamina, fitness and skill. Opponent stretches you in all these parameters. To beat Bolt you have to be like him in not only skill, but you have to be more in Speed, stamina and fitness, than him. So is with Maradona, Ronaldo, Phelps, Michael Jackson Nadal, Djokovic etc. People from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka etc play cricket out of convenience. This is the reason even though soccer, basketball and other games are popular in Europe and US, but there also people from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka etc settled for generations, play cricket only. These countries have made this lazy game their religion and are zero in all the other games which require speed, stamina, and fitness. British don't pride in cricket, they are soccer gaints. So are Australia, South Africa, New Zealand etc They are world class in soccer, rugby, track and field, swimming etc. If we combine cricket playing population of India , it is going to be even more than the population of Australia, England, South Africa etc combined, then also are not dominant. Cannot produce heros in games requiring speed, stamina and fitness, India Pakistan Bangladesh Srilanka etc try to search heros in lazy game of cricket. You talk of Bolt, they will bring cricketer to compare, You talk of Pele they will talk of cricketer, you talk of Nadal and Federer they will talk of cricketer. You talk of Michael Jordan they will talk of cricketer. Cannot rise in tough games, Indians have become ambassador of the lazy game of cricket, Cricket mad nation can never be sporting nation. It's an attitude. Japan and Korea wants to compete with top developed nations and make their presence felt be it technology, economy and games. Today they are among top world class footballers alongside European giants. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka are vying amongst themselves in a lazy game cricket and totally zero in games requiring speed,, stamina and fitness.
Thanks for the comprehensive comment - although I think you're enormously underselling how fit and athletic professional cricketers are
And why is that a problem. I think we should look to make cricket bigger not necessarily international cricket!
Kerry Packer says "hello" from his grave!
Now Williamson too.. People who keep telling this is just UK media having a grudge against BCCI are just either ignorant or are idiots who don't understand the effects of this franchise model
Now after ICC have leagues earning more than IPL in USA you won't say the same.
I like T20 but I love Test cricket, I don't care who wins a T20 match. And I'm from The west indies
Test cricket isn't the future, I don't understand why people can't wrap thier head around it.
Commercialisation is only possible through T10 or T20 cricket. That's the way forward to grow the sport.
Cricket survived because of t20 but players earn money because IPL is there. What do you say the decline of players in other countries?
By That Logoc Football Is Already In Hell.
If IPL was administered by UK or any western country then there would be no problem. Jealousy 😅
What about the mediocre 100 tournament
Indian test is thriving. Thebrits are jealous.
Why blame IPL??? Scrap your own local leagues if you are so worried
Some of these english guys are just salty that they couldn't commercialise a format they came up with. Else why would someone complain about the game and players making more money. If some players choose money over International matches new players will get picked to represent the country. The circle will move on.
Until & unless domestic cricket is not considered as bread & butter by national administrators & they don't try to monetise it, they'll never be able to get sufficient traction for their national teams. Its exactly how local administrative bodies for cities & towns should be empowered to have balanced growth & development of a province or a state. No amount of international bilaterals are going to make the game relevant, it will only lead to loss of interest globally because national pride becomes the fuel for interest in something as elementary as sports.
They are always jealous of Indian growth and if you pay your player properly why would they prefer IPL
IPL was the first proper league, it's thlse who came after that have saturated the sport with mediocrity😂 stop that shitty 100 if you're so concerned, no one even watches that.
The only problem is that England don't control the game anymore.... that's what all this talk is about 😂😂😂
The games done and dusted. International cricket is finished. Keep playing that ipl or other t20 leagues. The excitement that it had before is done. Cricket is done. Watch football instead better sport anyways
Here’s the cold hard truth if you can’t finish the game in 2-3 hours it’s a shit game. Can’t make aggressive plays and there is no drama. I used to hate watching long form cricket with my dad. Now we can sit down have glass of scotch and finish a game together
Cricket will become like football for good. No silly bilateral series, they should have 1 worldcup every 4 years and then just t20 premiere leagues around world, odi and tests should be phased out slowly as they are not suited for this generation only for grey hair men. Stars like kohli rebooted charm of tests and it also resulted in ashes gaining popularity with virat no longer being the captain tests will also die soon and so called ashes will also die once players sign up to multiple premiere leagues around world, it takes a little longer until all grey hair men are gone from admin and private money takes over icc and bcci.
When soccor and baseball etc can have private club team why not Cricket its not an absolutely new trend or unheard of in sporting. Just a biased baseless opinion and who is watching a 5 day test its a dead form too slow just adapt
You want your ball back? As Private Money has taken the place of a Private Club. Cricket needs a board like football has FIFA.
ECB should form a separate Welsh cricket team and direct both.
And whybshould British decide what's good and whats bad? How can they decide if only the test cricket is pure form of cricket?
Trent Boult is, unfortunately, at the end of his career. I am glad he has made himself available for the T20WC but i doubt his effectiveness. He has lost 10-20 klicks and it shows in the most recent BBL and IPL series. Tours are a good opportunity to test younger talent.
Looks like he is not making money from IPL ? 😂
The comment is on T20 which includes all franchises leagues but the thumbnail only on IPl. Clickbait- expect better from these guys
Cricket = India ....India = Cricket ...India = Money....Money = Players...Players = India + Money 💰 🤑 💸...India + Money = Cricketers lifestyle = Cricketers wives + Girlfriends + Kids Future + Parents life style = India 🇮🇳 = Power = Cricket = Your jobs = India + Money ....Figure it out or have you figured it out? 😊😀😀
It's pure business
why should the market be controlled by a board ? It makes no sense for cricket if all boards kept running same old boring series. these private leagues have transformed the sport. you are just mad ashes is not the biggest anticipated cricket event anymore. Mad that cricket went from elite club sport to a team sport where private players can build elite teams and have the best experience for all fans not just members.
A Players value in franchise cricket come 4m the nation it represents atleast in initial days till they establish their position as players in franchise. A players national identity comes when they come up with the attitude n mindset and training of that national cricket environment, so nations playing vital role here. Now the more n more franchise cricket get popular, we gonna see less of International n bilateral matches but this rarity will give boast to International matches because let's be honest ppl love when national identity fights. It's just pick your players talent wise not popularity wise have control over them, and most importantly don't cry about it rather do marketing on it as if you are representing Nations..
Noce to these guys getting a taste of their own medicine. Hurts,eh? It better.😂
Because of private money inflow T20 has reached where it is now. I don't know what's there problem with india
Let the paying public choose test mach is not free to watch ..let thr e.players and public decide not some commentator who lives off cricket and never played the game
Cricket was boring t 20 made it attractive entertaining
Leagues are the future ...let it floruish...thats how it should be
Why don’t you go and stop the EPL to save the football 😂😂😂
Because that's a different sport