This performance feels patchy and incoherent due to tempo and voicing fluctuations. I don't think the pianist has fully grasped this work. Compare to Virna Kljakovic's 2013 performance if you want to understand what Mr. Sokol is missing. ua-cam.com/video/E3qHO9aOQYM/v-deo.html
I'm not certain how this true and traditional version could be compared to overly-romanticized and interpreted modern equivalents. Horowitz played in a style closer to the intent of the composers as well, and it sounds as they intended.
I did listen to Vima's interpretation you posted, and it simply is not how this song was written, or performed in its day. If you are a pianist, you can immediately tell the difference, and it sounds as Sokol played.
@@roninreturns If you prefer originalist interpretations, that's fine:. But let's not pretend that an originalist interpretation is intrinsically worth more. The 21st century pianist has access to 150+ years of post-Chopin cultural and technical evolution, and pianos that Chopin could barely have imagined. I personally prefer that the pianist give us their best interpretation using all the tools of modern pianism.
I've never heard this before, but it doesn't make it any less beautiful. 🙂🎹
awesome
좋다..
He has the same last name as me😱
That’s Sokol!!!
Shepherd's Chapel Network !!!!!!! Chapter by Chapter / Verse by Verse !!!!!!!
Lipa
This performance feels patchy and incoherent due to tempo and voicing fluctuations. I don't think the pianist has fully grasped this work. Compare to Virna Kljakovic's 2013 performance if you want to understand what Mr. Sokol is missing. ua-cam.com/video/E3qHO9aOQYM/v-deo.html
I'm not certain how this true and traditional version could be compared to overly-romanticized and interpreted modern equivalents. Horowitz played in a style closer to the intent of the composers as well, and it sounds as they intended.
I did listen to Vima's interpretation you posted, and it simply is not how this song was written, or performed in its day. If you are a pianist, you can immediately tell the difference, and it sounds as Sokol played.
@@roninreturns If you prefer originalist interpretations, that's fine:. But let's not pretend that an originalist interpretation is intrinsically worth more. The 21st century pianist has access to 150+ years of post-Chopin cultural and technical evolution, and pianos that Chopin could barely have imagined. I personally prefer that the pianist give us their best interpretation using all the tools of modern pianism.