Watch "Why Each of the 16 Personalities are DANGEROUS" next! 👉 infj.me/3MARdl2 Let me know what other concepts you'd like me to explain like this one 🧡
Continuing on this super clear and comprehensive video, the further explanation and comparison of the four perceptive functions (Se vs. Ne vs. Si vs. Ni) would be an awesome next episode for this topic! 😉
And I’ll be replying « yeah yeah it’s almost 4pm, it’s the same » (need to stop doing this but when they go into too much details with the time , I feel the need to tease and reply this way 😭）
Myers Briggs are INFPs, of course, the Si on their 3rd stack will put the Jungian typology that full of abstract into details. Fi or Ti are categorizing functions.
I thought that too haha. That is one of the reasons why mbti was so interesting to me because it explained all these patterns I noticed since I was a child but I never had any words for them in a way ^^
@@levigivens plenty of Sensing youtubers out there. in fact, sensing types have a way better chance at entertaining all 16 types, since what they talk about is relatable for everyone.
INTJ here: What you call overview, I call context. I LOVE context! Knowing the big picture, and the things that lead up to a topic are pretty much my favorite thing ever! As long as it isn’t too detailed, obviously. Take too long to get to the point, and you’ve lost me. 😆
INTJ. When I tell someone something that happened to me, I start with the conclusion and then jump to the context, everything that led to that situation. I also don’t give a lot of details, for example I usually don’t name the people who participated because I don’t want to bore them and I know they’re not even going to remember, so why bother? In other words, only tell context and conclusion
I am an INFP, so i'm part of the intuitive types. I really like it when things are summarized because i get easily bored when they're too detailed. For me it is "Go straight to the point and please don't make so much speculations and details. Just say what you want to say no need for too much details". And that's why i struggle a lot when having conversations with my sensing friends. I easily lose interest on what they're saying and i just have to act like i listen to them.😭
Same- Though when I really care about something I think I do use my Si quite a bit, but otherwise I'm like this. I definitely don't use my Si often, just occasionally.
I am an ENFJ and my gf is ISFJ, she often gets confused when I talk in metaphors, I express my love by writing poems and she does it with beautiful letters. It’s like seeing and doing same things but in different perspectives. It’s very beautiful.
That's so cool! I'm an infp and I love writing abstract poems with many metaphors. Getting letters sounds so lovely. It's like you said, the same general thing but different in execution
@@Thefitty Everybody has their strengths and weaknesses, we can help each other and grow, thats the beauty in having a relationship with a different type than yours. But at the same time having something common is important too, otherwise it is hard to understand each at times. In my case she has the same level of emotional intensity. The love and care we have is magical.
I am INFJ married to ISFJ. That one little change in the second letter makes all the difference in the world. I live in the future, she lives in the present. I love theoretical frameworks, she likes concrete facts. I can learn (Frank didn’t mention this) by playing out scenarios in my mind. She learns by doing things and trying alternatives. We deal with these differences every day.
bro me too, i learn by playing scenarios in my head, just need to see it couple times, then i just think what i am going to do and how, and when, im really proud of this '' power'' lmao
It's an interesting oddity that the ones who are the opposite of yourself seem to be in extreme separation, but in reality, those who share a small portion of similarities end up being in greater conflict with our own personal visions of how we interact with the world.
If you'll excuse me, how would you describe your relationship, especially since your Mbti are INFJ & ISFJ? (I am interested in knowing the relationship between these two Mbti in real life🌞)
As an INTJ, this feels like such a call out 😭 This is a reoccurring problem of mine: I make a broad assertion, and when others inevitably ask for details, I literally don't remember anything. I don't remember WHY exactly I made the conclusion, it just pops up, and if I say it out loud, I have to commit. My brain likes to assume things and then argue them, but it's impossible to argue when you can't recall any evidence 😂
Same man... its so bad. Like you literally cant remember a specific example. But the sensors pretty much NEED it. But we sure can talk overview for hours.
I am a huge pattern seer and will follow on that pattern until I hit a brick wall. Typically, this approach serves me well but sometimes I can convince myself something is some way and will eventually realize I have wandered out of reality and into the weeds and I am totally wrong. It is so jarring to be hit with reality. But mostly my intuition serves me well.
as an ISTP, it's soo true. I've never been able to summarize stuff and always jumped into details first. the details would pile up, connect and give you the context. My dad is an N (probably INFJ) and he always asks me to summarize lmaooo. My ISFJ mom too gets into too much details even with random strangers like- lmaooo
I'm an INTJ and I agree LOL. When I go the library I skim through the titles and look at the quotes and read the summary at the back to judge the content of a book. When I read a book I love to start out at the preface. When I'm doing Maths I pick out different questions instead of repeatedly doing similar questions. I love contextual and cross topic questions. I always think "if such and such and such... THEREFORE"
Agreed, I'm an INFJ and the questions in maths that you clearly see the pattern and you need to do really familiar problems are so boring to me, like I get the concept why do dozens of exact same ones.. And when I'm reading a book I like the moment when I finally find out the ending so I can see the whole story clearly. The overview is very important to me.
I'm an infp and this whole video is so accurate to me. I love creating and speaking in metaphors / analogies especially when I study for school and try to understand a topic. Mnemonics are very helpful (the more abstract the better lol). Also I love to catagorize my favorite movies, books or songs etc. I actually have many playlists for different moods but it was very annoying to add the songs (I guess that was the detail part). When my mom (isfj) tells me about a book she talkes about every little detail that I think I've read the book by myself in the end and I'm like "I just want to know what the story is about. Can't you tell me a short summary?"
As an INFP, my mind naturally creates mnemonics out of nothing for almost every silly thing in my life. I use music _as_ mnemonics to relate to the various personalities of the people in my life, similar to how Loony Toons used different instruments to describe the behaviors of each character -- and it all just happens naturally, it isn't something I do intentionally.
😂😂😂😂 Estou rindo alto, porque esta última parte da sua história bateu forte aqui em casa. Minha mãe também é ISFJ e confesso que é um saco conversar com ela, as vezes. Os sensores tem uma dificuldade de resumir a conversa. Sempre que peço para minha mãe me dizer sobre o que se trata um filme, ela sempre acaba me contando o filme inteiro...haja paciência! Sempre achei que isso fosse um mal costume de criação dela, porque minha avó, que é uma ESFJ, também é outra que gosta de prolongar a conversa mais do que necessário. Mas agora percebo que isso é coisa de sensores mesmo. Já cheguei a ficar tão irritada que precisei sair da sala para não ter que ouví-la.#OMG PRECISO SER MAIS PACIENTE!
Out of all the Letters, N and S were always the ones that showed up almost interchangeably in my results. Depending on the test, the explanation or examples given, or even the time of the year, I’d lean S or N. In percentage based tests, I’d be pretty close in the middle for both of these. I think I understand why now. It seems that I am a sensing type who also quite often applies the imaginative aspect when necessary. I love patterns and structures and categories and analogies, but if something doesn’t actually fit the pattern, I do insist on re-examining the entire context or concept in order to get a more factually precise pattern. Another clue is probably that I get really irritated by vagueness, inaccuracy and unnecessarily repetitive information.
Oh my God this describes me exactly. Also, whenever I take the sixteen personalities test, my N and S percentages are very close; one will be 49 the other 51!
You should definitely look into cognitive functions. They'll help you figure out what type you are; online tests aren't reliable - especially ones that only use letter dichotomies
I am an ESFP with a brother who is ENFP. What I love about the dynamic is that being an extroverted sensor I tend to focus too much on how life is going right now, rather than where it could be in a years time. When I get stuck in that rut I can’t see beyond what is happening yet my brother comes in with all these other possibilities and the bigger picture that helps me to not feel so trapped. Then in my brother’s case, he is super disorganised and I’m pretty good at sorting things out and getting them done now. I’m quick to react to things going on around us, where as it takes him a while to process what has just happened
I have grown up in a family with all sensors and I’m an INTJ. I don’t usually enjoy talking about the same things they do, I find it so boring. I want to theorize, imagine and discuss scenarios, but they want to talk about all the facts about how family and friends are doing and how their work is going and so on and so forth. It’s not that I don’t care, it’s just that we could spend 5 minutes on it, then we can talk about other stuff. But you can’t really choose your family, so it’s just something I have to live with. And a rare time I run into someone who is interested in the same stuff that I am, an INTJ or INFJ or ENFP, and it feels like I’m capable of chatting with people as well.
Sou INFJ e me identifico totalmente com seu relato. Também cresci numa família de sensores que me fizeram me sentir inadequada por ser quem sou. A sensação de incompreensão sempre foi abundante. Penso que meus relacionamentos significativos serão apenas com intuitivos daqui para frente.
The longer this went on, the more sense it made. Sometimes I'll vent to my dad about the week, giving a general summary about my feelings or experiences, but no matter how well I think I explained my thoughts, he'll always ask for examples. It used to really upset me- why can't you just take my word for how I'm feeling, why do I have to prove the legitimacy of my problems to you- but this really puts some of those experiences into perspective. 👍✨
Great explanation! I also think sensors have a better time at expressing their imagination or feelings. Intuitives have a hard time expressing it. It’s like “I have a lot of ideas and in my mind these look great” but when the time comes to express it, Intuitives find it a difficult task. Sensors on the other hand, they know exactly how and when they can portray their imagination. So I think that sometimes sensors are great artist and are really assertive. also is the reason why Intuitives tend to stress when they have to talk about their feelings or portray their imagination, because sometimes they don’t even understand themselves 😅
I agree. I doubted myself if I’m really intuitive (I’m INTP) because my ideas are big/simple and can’t seem materialize as imagined. So turns out this is common intuitive problem. Possible the thing we imagine is actually impossible to exist in reality even in words. For us the ideas are like starting an artwork from white canvas, you don’t know where to start. I think sensors can express better because they base their ideas/feelings from what exists.
@@kunogi09midori I also agree with you. As an INTP I think a lot and imagine most of the time of my day but when it comes to express my thoughts I mess up things and end up telling something weird on the other hand who is an ISTP can express her thoughts very easily.
I'm not so sure of that. I'm an INFP and usually have an easier time understanding the quick ramblings and strange connections of an intuitive than the onslaught of details that a sensor fires at me. Talking with with other person is like putting together a puzzle. When a sensor tries to explain something to me, a lot of times they throw at me a bunch of pieces (=facts) in an amorphous lump without the frame (=context) saying "Here, take this photo, what do you think?" while I'm looking at the pile thinking "What image? I only see a chaos of pieces and nothing else."
not really... i know how to express my feelings and my points most of the time because i understand them(i think it's more like you have more T or F, personal opinion), it's just that i will decide to express it or not by depending on the situation. but you have a point tho, sometimes i just have some weird thoughts and imagination that i can't even explain how i get this imagination. like boom wow, here it is. why this? please don't question. unlimited imagination. btw i am a high N here so yeah...
I’m an INTJ, and I really love using analogies when explaining something and in my approaches. Like how studying accounting (im an Accountancy student) made me realize that a business entity can be related to an organism. I’m aware that the analogies I have may be bizarre at first glance, but I just see a connection between the essence of things.
I was unsure if I was INTJ or ISTJ when I first started to get into MBTI but I identify a lot more with intuition than sensing (I took a cognitive functions test and scored much higher on intuition than sensing and I got the function stack of INTJ). I am a big picture observer and often miss details. I absolutely LOVE patterns and find them in almost anything. I’ve been told to get my head out of the clouds since I prefer the abstract world over the sensory world. And I’ve been told that a lot of what I say is confusing (even tho it makes perfect sense to me). I also am extremely future oriented and love to try and predict the future based on what I know
INTJ here and same. When I started getting into MBTI I didn't really know the difference between sensing and intuition and I totally thought I was a person of facts but turns out I'm not. I just didn't know myself so well back then. I'm living inside my head so much that I often miss details, especially the ones about the sensory world. But what made me understand I'm an intuitive is definitely the pattern thing. I love patterns and I find them easily in anything. I've also often been the kind of person who goes like "it's obvioulsy going to happen this thing" and then the thing happened. And it was just so easy to foresee because it was all about pattern but other people seemed not to see that. It's just natural to me.
im an intp and my friend is an istp. in 8th grade, we had to write a 3-4 page double-spaced short story, but my friend was struggling a lot because she kept adding too many details. it got to the point where the introduction of her “short” story was 5 pages long, she ended up starting over and was still struggling to limit her story to only 4 pages. i was basically the opposite of her.
As an INFP, I synthesize too much. Maybe that's why I absolutely hate to make a biography of someone because there's no core idea, just a bunch of facts and details and I never know what I should talk about and I overthink it to no end lmao.
In high school I had required reading of the classic book Silas Marner. The first few chapters were nothing but details/descriptions of the setting of the story. It took forever to get into the actual story.
I found this helpful because I just broke off a relationship with another intuitive. It took awhile for me to see he was emotionally abusive because the specific abusive behaviors (and "small" deceits) didn't fit the category I put him in as a good, caring person. The downside of having any kind of tunnel vision (N or S), especially when relating to others, is that we can miss sifting through information that's truly significant when forming a more realistic perspective about someone.
You can tell Frank is an intuitive because he can never think of a real-life example to explain what his big-picture idea means in real life! You can also tell I am an intuitive because the sentence before made sense in my head but probably not in real life bc I’m overlooking the details of how to write a real sentence.
As someone who tested 87% intuitive, this was hilariously spot on. And it's illuminated some of my recent work problems 🤔 (especially with a sensing-type superior)
I/ENFJ here who works closely with an ISTP. I got into your videos after an MBTI staff development day to try to improve our communication. (Some of the comedy sketches are almost word for word conversations we've had haha!) Something I've found fascinating: we are both detail-oriented and visionary, but with different priorities. I am detail-oriented about the future and communication, and visionary about patterns, categorizing, and reading into emotional context. My coworker is detail-oriented about the concrete present and visionary about ultimate goals. Probably 80% of the time we talk past each other, it's that.
I have often seen Frank James being described as an INFJ (an intuitive) but I have so often also sense a bias against intuitives in his videos that I think it must be a self-defense mechanism. However, as an intuitive I hate to admit it but he's accurate in this video. And yes, I am aware I am doing the 'intuitives thing' with my opening comment 😆
@@lilyflynn6086 Hi Lily, I was at least 50% trying to be ironic with my comment :P And being intuitives I guess it does give FJ and myself license to poke fun at ourselves. I have a lot of respect for sensors; they are so grounded unlike intuitives who tend to live in their heads more. The only thing about sensors is that they can sometimes take things too literally or they need things explained to them very specifically. It's kinda like intuitives are like the Platonists while sensors are like the Aristotelians. There is nothing wrong with either side; we are just different :)
@@Shayne_T I have no idea what personality type he is. I have only seen a lot of people describe him as INFJ.. He doesn't look like an INFJ to me too 😂 He looks to me more like an ENFP.
The analogy part is so spot on. I always compare stuff to get my point across quickly but so many people counter with "You absolutely cannot compare those things!". This is especially true when trying to debate someone in a comment section where summarizing is so valuable because space and time are limited. If I have to go into the details, I'm outta there lol
if you're extremely confused as to whether you're "intuitive" or "sensing" because you relate to different aspects of both so much, it's time to learn about cognitive functions. ExxJ and IxxP types are not super controlled by their N function or S function. we have it relatively balanced. this is why i you see lots of ESxJs making generalizations and IxNPs correcting things for the sake of nuance. the order of our cognitive functions explain this. it's all about preference and some preferences are heavier than others
As an ISTP who is the DM for a Ghostbusters RPG, it blows my mind how my INFJ friend can take two facts her character learned in the game and spin them into a grand overview of the entire situation. Occasionally it’s incredible how right she is! Other times, she’s waaay off base, but unfortunately she doesn’t reshape her view of the fictional situation as more facts are discovered, and is also extremely persuasive-so she can convince the other players to all also believe her theory. 😋
As an infp, I am very particular about the details and get stressed when the details are wrong, even the little ones. I also love seeking the truth and facts, what is real and what is not. This made me second-guessed my type again, some of them does not describe me haha
If you study function stacks, infps can get very tripped up on their Te function and using it as a crutch. I am infp and I use math and facts as a security blanket, but after awhile it becomes very unsatisfying
Beautifully explained! As an ENTJ I have butt heads many times with my ESTJ colleagues because of my preference for intuition. It stresses me out to actually bother focusing on the details but when it comes to consulting, perhaps the detail is particularly important. Nevertheless, it's a pain to watch people obsess with the detail and not realise the opportunities lost or the anticipated issues just because it hasn't happened yet, as my 'guesses' tend to be pretty accurate.
That’s why it’s important to have both to complete a project with proper tasks assigned to everyone. With only intuitives it will work but the lack of details might weaken the project. And only sensors well, the project may lack long term vision or take too much time to start. As an INTJ I understood early that details were important, but I can’t bother it’s just so boring. I just delegate to someone who enjoy taking care of it (if possible).
As an ENTJ my experience with the S-types in worklife is that they are more prone to stick to whatever the data tells them currently, even if you yourself can see the pattern, sniff out risk and act preventively. Very frustrating. Ofc details are important and should be factual, but my god the myopia!
This comment is so impactful - as an ENTJ I am constantly lumped in with ESTJ’s and I feel like we could not be more different. I am not a fan of sensor thinkers - they are completely devoid of imagination and too risk-averse
Soooo, all throughout this video us N types were basically called aloof and based on supposition. Not necessarily true, since as we know we both look at facts AND rely on intuition but one thing is sure: In general we have a higher affinity for the abstract, metaphysical and spiritual, which is a very important aspect of life that is quite undervalued.
omg this explains so much, I always get comments along the lines of "explain further" or "give examples" on my essays back when I was in school and I'm like why?! 🤣
As an ENFP, I fit the description of intuitives with the first part. I don't understand why anyone would start a project without an outline. Whenever I write a story, I need to have the theme, and a general plot planned out from start to finish. I may or may not stick to my plan, but I need to see the big picture to even know where to start on something. For the second part, I can be very detail oriented when it comes to facts. My Ti blindspot hates subjective logic, so I really think it's a Te thing rather than a sensor thing. I notice false things easily. My ISFJ stepmom very evidently used Ti and only cares if something "makes sense" even if there's something wrong with it. To her, as long as it's similar enough to reality and can be understood, it's good. Not for me. For the third, fourth, and fifth part, I definitely care more about patterns and connections than wrong information. What you mentioned about sensors needing to give examples, I relate to, but only because I have a fear of being misunderstood. I definitely use analogies. New information is useless unless it can be related to older information (Ne and Si working together) so I tend to use analogies, but sometimes they are only relevant to me because of my unique past experiences that not everyone can relate to. For the sixth part, I'm not especially good at making predictions, but I definitely like guessing and I am good at following one thing to another. I got good at algebra because I could extrapolate non-obvious information from an equation and get a general idea of the mechanics of the equation. Sometimes I have a hard time sorting through the sea of details and coming to a concrete answer however. For the seventh part, I definitely relate when you mentioned about imagining future outcomes. I have far too many plans to account for random possibilities that would rely on very slim odds. I also can't stop myself from imagining how a situation could have turned out and I panic whenever I realize I get lucky because I imagine so many negative outcomes that I realize how close something bad was to happening. I have to tell myself the past is the last, but what if something identical happens again and the negative outcome happens? Anyways, thank you for confirming I am indeed an intuitive. Edit: I just realized how I put this into way more words than necessary 💀
I feel like the intuition "guessing" aspect in N types sometimes can get a bit insane. Like even tho I'm INFP many times when i get a "gut" feeling about something I try to tell myself to be more rational, to wait, to see the facts, and many times that "gut" feeling is indeed proven right despite not seeming to be logical (once i stop and try to think about WHY i had that guy feeling i can list the reasons i couldn't express in words before)
Totally relatable! Whenever I have to guess something, I discard the first guess as it seems as more of a gut feeling than reasonable and speak aloud the second or third or whatever seems the most logical after weighing the facts but most of the time my first guess is right or closest to the truth. All those times, when at at school I would make a guess and the one I thought first but didn't say would be indeed the right answer: Dang it!
I'm an infp and these gut feelings are the things I trust most tbh. I always pay attention to it and follow my heart ... which sounds really cheesy but it's true haha
@@driheart Same here. Usually my gut feeling is right but I don't understand how and doubt myself so I have to go on an investigation to find out whether I was right or just making the wrong assumption. Drives me nuts when I'm stressed though haha
That first insight is so huge for me - I just can't understand when people start an explanation with all the details without giving me the overarching context. Makes me both confused and irritated.
INFP here, I can tell, that at work I‘m into details but also having the „big picture“ in the back of my mind. I trained for this. I had to learn to combine both things, and I‘m still improving to gain balance. I can tell that‘s an exhausting way.
As infj with adhd, i always was shamed of my esays looking numb because i jumped to conclusions i made first and then facts. And istj teacher HATTEEEDDD IT.
I'm an INFJ too and I have the same problem. I have a general idea of what I'm writing about and I'm trying to explore it, but we have to give examples and I'm getting lost in all the details and I don't know how to put it together to match my vision..
You should do a video on a group of friends who are all infj's! I think it would be interesting to say the least. I'm an infj and have a few acquaintances who are infj's. I was wondering what it would be like if we were all in the same room talking and how that conversation would look like. Appreciate your content! Your channel is one of my favorites!
This is definitely a good idea💡 as even though you are all INFJs you wont do things the same so we'll get to see various textures and layers to this type. Would definitely be a good idea for each MBTI type too (-INFP)
INTJ. Knowing X, Y, Z, W, U, V is neat. Seeing that X usually leads to Y and W leads to U and V is a bit more neat. Realizing that W prevents X but still encourages Y but less than X with the bonus results of V and U one of which feeds back into W, perpetuating the process, and the other separately acts to increase the probability that Z will happen while decreasing the likelihood of X more than W does… It’s seeing the Rube Goldberg machinery of the universe. It’s the stuff that makes quantum reality and macro reality seem less separate distinct existences governed by disparate rules and more the unified whole they are.
yes! i watched some physicist dudes talk about how they didn't know how quantum mechanics lead to macro physics and i understood it immediately. it's like pointillist paintings (ex, Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte featured in ferris bueller's day off), there's many tiny dots doing their own thing but as you pull out they lose distinctness, and you mostly see the larger image they're working together to construct. but the dots don't go away, they're still there, doing their funny little dot things.
ok you've sold me. I am an intuitive and thought I was superior but I can see the strengths of my sensing partner. BUT the intuitive wants to be free to expand and talk and can't find this opportunity in sensing so god help us
Good stuff! Now I know why having to make a detailed outline of my report was so arduous in school. I just wanted to give a broad overview and figure out all the details later when I actually wrote it. And when public speaking I just jot down a few key points and then I can just link it all together in the moment. Having to write every word of a speech beforehand would be detestable. I’m always categorizing. But I get bogged down and paralyzed when i can’t see all the categories or which category every item fits into. Getting, and staying, organized is hard. Now that I’m older I realize it’s counterproductive to constantly guess what’s coming next because I am missing details! So I’ve had to learn to stop myself from guessing and just focus and listen to what the other person is actually saying. Thanks FJ! -ENFP
My problem with outlines was the opposite. Every fact ended up being its own point. Too many points in the outline. My categories ended up a list of facts and summaries weren't very summarizing.
It's funny, this actually corresponds to my two biggest frustrations in conversation: people who go off on unnecessary tangents all the time and can't get to the point (intuitives), and people who keep shoving in unnecessary details which genuinely don't matter and make the whole thing a drag to listen to (sensors). I love both types of people (and I'm pretty sure I'm guilty of the same things sometimes!), but man, I really wish words were used more efficiently, lol
Ne dominant types love tangents (ENTP, ENFP) most of all. You sound like someone with Te in slot 1 or 2. As an INTJ I can say "unnecessary" tangents wear me out almost as much as accuracy at the expense of action (ISTP, INTP).
Them: "So I ran into Larry -- Lanny? Larry? Yeah, I think his name is Larry. Or is it Lanny?" Me: It doesn't matter!!!!! Just keep going! Them: "So anyway, Larry - or Lanny -- he used to live in that old house by the Thompson farm -- you know it --- yes, you do --- they used to grow blueberries in the summer, and blackberries too, I think?? Because we went out there and picked blueberries and I think we picked blackberries, too. Although maybe the blackberries we picked was that time we drove up to Bloomerville to that berry farm, remember that? And..." Me: But what about Larry?
I always thought I was a sensor but it turns out I’m actually a intuitive after a lot of researching and learning about each functions. Thanks for this video FJ. You’ve really helped a lot ❤
For all the stupid Instagram accounts that literally ignore the sensors, pretending they don't exist or something. I think the sensors are way too underestimated among the mbti community. :/
And intuitives are underestimated in real life (because where their strengths lie often can’t be directly-seen unless you know them intellectually). It balances-out.
As an istp true I prefer to trial n error n go into the details first then create an overview .. sometimes. Lots of times i learn kinesthetically and sometime I get really confused when something isnt concrete or specific enough.. i do have intuition and imagination despite not relying on it most the time 😎😎😎
The overview thing is accurate. When I tell friends a story, I give the overall gist first then along the way I remember to add details that matter. In my view they should get it because I’ve given them the context where whatever detail I remember to add can obviously fit into.
Exatamente. Sabendo do que se trata, fica mais fácil de imaginar o que pode ocorrer em ir discutirão os detalhes. Eu acho que os sensoriais são muito robotizados e sem nenhuma imaginação...😒
I really needed this video cuz whenever I take a mbti test the intuition and sensing part alternate between 51%ish and 49%ish But I love binary things and getting a summary before indulging into the specifics and I definitely LOVE patterns and to categorize things and don’t love to have subdivisions or nuance things (like controversial topics) that I can’t figure in which category they r
This is interesting reflecting on my job and my work relationship with my manager - I am an INFJ and my supervisor/manager is an ISTJ (we are both lawyers)- we have different ways approaching cases but we both really appreciate attention to detail.
I honestly think that the reason intuitives will summarize information because we tend to, or at least, I tend to filter out what I want the other person/audience to know, without wasting mine or theirs time. I will only give details if others are interested in the topic or they will need it later on. - INTP
Omg the analogy part is so relatable… I’m an intuitive type and I’m always making the most random extensive analogies that make so much sense in my brain, but no one else gets it bc my brain makes absolutely no sense
Tangents is the key to look for. I'm intuitive. I realised years ago when talking to sensors they were getting frustrated because I just can't help going off on tangents in every conversation. I noticed that whenever I am conversing with someone who goes off on tangents I am indeed speaking to an intuitive.
E o que seria "sair pela tangente"? Porque se tiver relacionado com rodeios e detalhes insignificantes, definitivamente eu não me encaixo, porque gosto de ir direto ao ponto.
But don't people go into tangents ehen they are trying to get all the facts straight? Like recalling petty details like the name of a person or road or town and eho was there and why etc.?
I act like a sensor when I’m in an Fi-Si loop (obviously!). I recently got out of it after 2-3 years and it feels so refreshing seeing deeper than the surface. The tangible and objective is b o r i n g.
I’m intuitive (intj) and I really need to learn how to use this sensor power. It might bring way more depth in everything I do on a daily. I usually go pretty well into details concerning work stuffs, when I need to make everything perfect. But if you ask me to tell you my day, tell a story or give my impressions on a book… one sentence and I’m done. Managing sensor function is needed in social situations especially if you need to get something out from them.
This makes so much sense. I'm N, my husband is S, and I am seeing how these descriptions have played out in our communication. It can make bumps in sorting things out, but can also be really beneficial for balancing each other's weak points.
Same here I’m N .. INTP And my fiancé seems to be S I’m worried he won’t be able to understand me but I think as you said that will help my weak S. how is the relationship going?
We're no strangers to love You know the rules and so do i A full commitment's what i'm thinking of You wouldn't you get this from any other guy I just wanna tell you how i'm feeling Gotta make you understand Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you We've known each other for so long Your heart's been aching but you're too shy to say it Inside we both know what's been going on We know the game and we're gonna play it And if you ask me how i'm feeling Don't tell me you're too blind to see Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
INFJ here. Categorizing and Summarizing things solves two issues. One, it takes a lot of data, or it takes an overwhelming concept and breaks it down to more manageable parts. It's more efficient. Two, it dumbs down concepts for other people. Lol. Same with the analogy - it makes it easier for other people to understand. I do all three all the time. (I used to be an early childhood educator, and for the last 24 years have been explaining complex business and technical requirements to IT folks).
Okay, now I am 100% sure finally that I'm an intuitive I just hate giving examples and categories are always a huge part for me. I was always confused bc I like facts but also over review and theories and moving around dancing and going to gym.
We used to differentiate our global (intuitive) learners from our anayltical (learners) when i was teaching. This is so spot on. Global learners need to see the big picture first and then move to the details; the analytical learners, of course, are the opposite. Analytical learners deduce. I'm an ENFJ I think - thing is that my N and S are split evenly., so can function as ESFJ too I guess.
@@bethtaylor9773 the website 16 personalities (since you're mentioning percentages I take it that you used that one) makes it look like it's E vs I, S vs N, T vs F and P vs J but MBTI is actually about cognitive functions, not letters. So ENFJs have Fe as their primary function, Ni as auxiliary, Se as their tertiary and Ti as inferior function. Maybe your tertiary function is just well developed. Se is about living in the now, focusing on the outside world and getting information through one's senses. Does that seem like something that you do well, thus making you interpret this as being 50% a senser?
You could explain J/P parameter. To me it makes sense only when you know cog functions, but not really without them. At least I don't understand what would they be for except for distinguishing if a person's two top functions are extraverted perceiving and introverted judging or vive versa.
To be honest, the unreasonable, underestimation of the sensors by the American mbti community combined with the first difference the video shows, "overview / details" gave me a déjà vu from when I sent my art portfolio to an American studio, as they pointed out as “negative aspects” the fact I draw details, shades and light, while what they want is mainstream, simplified and flat caricatures and vectors because "they are easy to sell". But in Europe, I am hired as an illustrator a lot exactly because I don't follow the caricature simplified pattern and they seem to appreciate my lighting and details. So...maybe the underrating stereotype is a cultural thing? Who knows... In my country we are also very philosophical and we enjoy analyzing things and questioning, and I do as well, often much more than any intuitive I know, even if my Si is dominant. And I have been asked by an intuitive how and I am into fantasy and published my own fantasy books since I am not an intuitive but a sensor and "fantasy is an intuitive's thing" ...guys...stereotypes don't define us all. Everyone has their own value and for things to move forward you need both the vision and the practical person that can make it come true. And often, against the stereotypes, one can be both.
If you drew your avatar and your banner, that American studio was missing out because your art is great! Fantasy being a intuitive notion doesn't match up with the notion of sensors being the largest population since they're the ones funding pop culture franchises, especially with the notion of ISTJs and ISFJs being the most common types and being so loyal to uphold the enduring fantastical/science fiction characters. Curious if that notion has made a lot of ISFJs think they're INFP because of that stereotype. Although, INFP J.R.R. Tolkien is the one fantasy author to Rule them all! At least what I read, which isn't much, and I haven't read LOTR or Chronicles of Narnia (Horse and His Boy was my favorite...but I don't remember a single thing about it) since I was a kid. Best regards with your illustrator career!
@@JohnHenrysaysHi Thank you so much! I actually drew this when I was 14... I hope I have improved since then , but it means a lot to me that you like it even if it's so old 🌺 Your point is exactly what I had in mind! And Tolkien has also been the example that I think we most have in mind when it comes to that matter. (And I am a Huge fan of Tolkien, half of my fanart is about The Silmarilion XD) Thank you so much for your kind words and I return the best wishes with whatever expresses you the best or the goals you may have. 🌺
@@CineShinya Hey, as "they" say: make new art but keep the old; one is silver, and the other is gold. And I'm sure your new stuff is gold if you continue that trajectory since you were 14. That American animation studio was missing out. And by "they" I meant me. Psst...you know the all knowing, all seeing "they" narratives? That's me. It's how I get my kicks coming up with all different "you know they say..." narratives, especially coming up with ones that contradict each other to see what happens. I bet you're now re-thinking the well wishes for my goals...although, you did say best meaning, it probably should be for something good, and if not, then you were the kind one suggesting I had noble goals like a stereotypical friendly ISFJ...I'm kidding! Hopefully, I didn't loose with these jokes, but if you'd like to share your inspiration behind your avatar, feel free! Very cool that your fan art is of The Silmarillion. I think Tolkien helped create such a rich template and his LOTR will endure for all time. Regardless of anyone's type, I think he's an amazing inspiration for making art to uplift people, and perhaps, Tolkien's Middle Earth isn't everyone's cup of tea from a surface level, but I think if people find the right variation that caters to their sensibilities, they can appreciate it. And being that Si is so particular, ISFJs be excellent barer of the torch. Also, ISFJ Samwise Gamgee is the best. When I think of best fictional friends, I think of Sam, Cliff Booth (Once Upon a Time in Hollywood), Mary Bailey (It's a Wonderful Life), Lisa (Rear Window), Mel Miller (A Face in the Crowd), and...well, pretty much the entire Fellowship of the Ring are up there. Perhaps, the reason behind that American studio's decision was because they were thinking of people wanting a similar appeal with Myers and Briggs where they're trying to give the basic of essence/simplistic representation for the widest appeal for people to project themselves into, but, and I'd enjoy hearing your thoughts, I think of Meyers and Briggs types like emoticons where it's basic cave men language that can be used to represent so many different emotions without context similar to how personality type is just the basic essence of personality type whereas people's full personality is informed how the choices they make with their intellect and will which is informed by people's beliefs, faith, intelligence (which factors into what you initially said about the underestimation of sensors- people are missing out!), maturity, experiences, upbringing, financial situation, job, culture, health, surrounding, education, etc. Conceptually, ISFJs can be more interesting than INFJs since if they're just common types, then the people would have to work more on their personality to stand out, and if they're dominant function is introvert sensing, they're informed/energized with actual experience, and every single person is different, and being that introverted sensing is so particular to the individual, it provides a wealth of interest. And now thanks to the internet, it's probably helped a lot of sensors develop intuition way quicker thanks to the wealth of options for someone with just the right personality at the right time to cater to each individuals particular interests to make them interested in developing intuition in a fun way. And this is just my theory, but I think if type is based on the overall big picture, then it makes sense for types to be be most similar to the same type with one letter off, and possibly the reverse say for an ISFJ since, and please share your thoughts! In order to get refined sensing with Si, it would require extroverted sensing, and I'm currently thinking being introverts, and depending on how much they spend time alone, ISFJs could develop more Fi than Fe, or be focused on their own Fi values to better Fe harmonize with people, which means that they're conceptually adept at Si and Fi which are very particular functions providing for a very unique individual as opposed to an INFJ attempting to simplify everything combined with Fe, that doesn't make for such uniqueness (unless they're more introverted developing that particular Fi which might be a case with Frank James which is a reason people think he's an INFP but I don't know!) which is why I think a lot of people of every type would relate to Frank James' INFJ skit segments since it's the broadest appealing type meaning, it's helpful for setting a standard for cool and attractiveness, but everyone is different so it's just a way to get the general population on the same page to highlight those, like yourself, who don't fit in with the generalities. And getting back to ISFJs, if they're so introverted to develop Fi more (and this is just my theory!), they might think themselves similar to ESFPs along with INFJs, ESFJs, ISFPs, and ISTJs, but the distinction will be apparent when thinking of ISFJs conceptual weakness with thinking and intuition, and because they're weaker in those areas, the more "preferred" Ti and Ne with be help make the distinction where they'll appear so much different conceptually than ESFPs and ISFPs, and then somewhat ISTJs but being that I think the introverted thinking depth of Ti requires breaking apart Te for a refined consistent logic that works for the individual, ISFJs can relate to ISTJs. So the inferior Ne is going to be more apparent with lack of inclination toward Ni and therefore by not being so inclined toward that Ni reduction, ISFJs are going to be interesting....conceptually...everyone is their own unique individual. Also, I think ESFPs might not focus on developing Si like ISFJs with Se because the introverting side of Si isn't required for Se where they can just go go go experiencing and not refining, so an ESFP most likely won't confuse himself or herself with being an ISFJ. And with that, there might be something with ENFPs and ENTPs not being for refining Ni which is why....I'm thinking that might be why Frank James said the types he'd want to be the most alien with are ISFJs, ISTJs, ENFPs, and ENTPs...I didn't think this through, I'm thinking right now as I'm writing to you and I gotta go! haha Hope some of this made sense! Feel free to let me know if you disagree or having any other thoughts! I really appreciate your reply. And your classy pleasant emoticons...as opposed to what I consider to be the caveman over the top smiley faces ones. Emoticons like the flowers you used or Christmas trees help create pleasant tone in a more elegant manner in my opinion but if you use those other emoticons, I don't mind! Hope your week is off to a nice start!
@@JohnHenrysaysHi My friend...I must admit I was astonished, this has the biggest reply I have ever seen on youtube! Which I will take it as that you really gave it some time and thought, so thank you for sharing all these thoughts with me. Also, kudos for the separated paragraphs, they are easier to read. I agree with most things you say, so I don't see a point to elaborate on them one by one. Overall, I find your train of thought quite interesting as also the references and examples you gave. And about your humour, I have an ENTP brother. I can handle a lot~ About the American studios, I agree to what you said, but also the American culture seems to sacrifice quality for quantity in every aspect. More people to please, so more simplified products. The problem with that is that people are satisfied with products below average. You see that in music, you see that in food and films...They focus on the trends and not on making something actually good. Sometimes people are scared of what is good because they can't reach it, so it's not as relatable. The comparison of the INFJs with ISFJs, was pretty much to the point as well, but when it comes to cognitive functions, the culture but also the daily life of each person or their interests might lead to the utilisation of each one of them. You mentioned internet, but also reading interesting books or watching good films can help you grow as a person. I know Ni dominants that can't grasp many philosophical concepts or feel irrelevant to them because their Ni is trapping them in their own point of view, something Ne users don't struggle with as we are open to different perspectives. I have also noticed INFJs make often generalizations and come up with quotes that seem wise at first, but missing all the exceptions and facts, they just created a beautiful lie. Something that doesn't apply in real life. And they refuse to see it. Even FJ here, from his content overall in comparison to other MBTI channels, I don't know if it's an Ni or something else, but... he tends to stick a lot to his own perspective and the way he portrays the characters never breaks the stereotypes or gets deeper. I know the sketches are comedic, but they seem too....2D. Dear Kristin, on the other hand, gives them more depth and has them interact with each other making them more real. But maybe this is also because she is an Extrovert and FJ is an introvert. And this might play a part, as she appears to know well people from each type and mimic their behaviour, still in a comedic way but more dimensional. I am also surprised and glad of your appreciation to my reply and use of emojis that are a little out of the ordinary with a more floral approach. I think smiley faces wouldn't define me as much as an offer. And offering a beautiful flower is as if you indeed give something to the other person more than a smile that might be fake. Even if we still talk about emojis. And artistically speaking, the flower emojis are more elegant than the yellow silly faces, aren't they?~ 🌸🏵🌹🌺🌻🌼🌷 And you can be creative with the aesthetic as well 🍁🍂🍊🌾 Or express not just a fleeting emotion or reaction but your entire state of deeper feelings. 🥀 I didn't think I would come to analyze emojis, but here we are. Thank you for bringing it up. It lead to an interesting path. 💐
@@CineShinya I really appreciated what you said about the smiley emoticons coming across fake, and I agree. Of course, it depends on the person and sometimes it could provide a helpful balance for more aggressive people where they have to swing the other way over the top emotionally. Also, they're useful to help de-escalate things with them since because since they're so emotional they only respond to emotion, and that's not a feeler or thinker thing which is something that Frank and other people bring up. The Meyers and Briggs foundation says: "Don't confuse Feeling with emotion. Everyone has emotions about the decisions they make. Also do not confuse Thinking with intelligence. Everyone uses Thinking for some decisions and Feeling for others. In fact, a person can make a decision using his or her preference, then test the decision by using the other preference to see what might not have been taken into account." Although, I understand how Fe reads the emotional expressions of others and how Fi values can be informed by ones' emotions, so I think I understand what they're saying. Frank uses emoticons a lot but I understand being that this is channel is how he's making a living so he just has to appeal to what the people want but, if someone used those kind of emoticons with me when it was just me seeing the emoticon, and not the person thinking other people were reading our texts, I wouldn't appreciate it and think they're phony or trying to manipulate me. And I might use emoticons back at them or mirror them to try to help them feel better or I'm on pick up pants patrol in covering my butt from some weirdo. It's like white knight men/feminists being so overly the top about women where I'm thinking, they're probably perverts or I'll see them on the news later on. Also, I think similarly about many into anime with the over the top emotions. Although, the attraction to the over the emotions might be by people who have trouble reading people so they need the over the top emotions. That might have something to with INTPs and ISTPs being into anime. My inability to read people well is one interested I had in Meyers and Briggs so I'm not putting anyone down, and it's something I actually broke down over years ago when someone was asking when I was interest in Meyers and Briggs because I wasn't good at reading people...but I think I'm decent in away, which I'm sure you, and anyone is, if you're a "real person", it doesn't matter what type you are: real recognizes real. Everyone appreciates authenticity. Reasonably of course, there's a time and a place for everything, and everyone should have privacy and with so many weirdos, I don't recommend full out authenticity but more relative authenticity. Not bashing anime, since Dragon Ball was my favorite franchise, and Son Goku was my favorite fictional character (at least up to the Freeza arc since he and the rest of the characters lost their intelligence and, while they are flawed, they had a nobility to them, and that nobility was lost as well...plus, the writing made no sense but that's another conversation). Also, I like Ponyo when I saw it. And I saw that you had anime looking videos on your channel, and that's the kind of anime aesethetic I think is great. But regardless of my preferences, hopefully you understood what I meant with my Spidey sense going off with certain people into the overly emotional fake nice guy stuff where, again, it's like "I'll see you on the news" and stay away from kids, and all our daughters and sisters, weirdos! Uh oh I gotta go! Uh...Your explanation for emoticons was excellent. This is my favorite reply I ever got in this channel. Also, great observation on what you said about Ni. Although, with Frank James, the reason not to go deep is because he's appeal to potentially millions, and can't go deeper/more nuanced because then that would veer away from personality type and more into personality in my opinion. The cartoony-ness helps and while I think Kristin has great skits (After her Easter one, I think she went down a really niche dorky path where she lost me, but then I saw her recent Philosopher ones and that was back own point because I didn't think her skits were very good (to be frank, I thought her last one with the INTP was awful). I gotta go. Thank you for your thoughts. Feel free to tag me any time to see me in the comments. I write a lot of out there stuff because I'm trying to be entertaining but also...fluff to keep certain people away. And also, I write things to make a point so I gotta go Hope you have a great day! Thank you so much! Please keep using your creative, graceful, elegant emoticons. I've been thinking about emoticons for years and was so happy to read your post! Also, again rushing so sorry if this is all over the place!
Omg - I've spent years thinking I was an intuitive, especially because I was always like "of course I have an imagination", "I'm quite capable of abstract thought", "I'm very good at brainstorming ideas", and "I very much appreciate theory and philosophy". In fact, I'm a PhD Candidate in Sociology, so I'm also very good at picking up on patterns. However, your description of a sensor and what sensors look for sounds exactly, pretty much word-for-word, like the critiques I give to so many students when I read their papers. My feedback is quite literally: "where are your sources?", "this is a sweeping generalization", "this misses the nuance and complexity", "this is opinion, not fact", "this should be grounded in some kind of evidence", "this is vague"; "you need details and examples".... it drives me NUTS and I could never understand it. And oddly enough, I always have felt like many of the questions in the cognitive functions/MBTI tests are either vague, or invalid because they are double-barrelled and poorly worded which made the tests so confusing to me. Your video is making me think that maybe I'm actually a sensor. Even when I'm teaching, I consistently ground theories in real-life, concrete examples so students can see how the topics/abstract concepts at hand are applicable, and what they 'look like' in the real world. I love theories and philosophies in my area (e.g., ethics, equity/equality, morality, social justice) because I do think they carry weight for real people. Anyway, I really appreciate this video!
Your description of these two was very sensing! Especially when you said to "get to the point" in reference to summaries. I always need someone to tell me why I should care or else I won't listen. Not sure if that's intuitive, being a questioner tendency, or just neurodivergence though lol Edit: finished the video and now I think this was more of just a general rant about intuition lol
It didn't feel like a rant to me. I mean, i do rant about those long intros, which I agree with even as an intuitive. But I do agree that is wasn,t very intuitive of him thinking that people that do that are intuitive because I am not like that. Like, those videos with long intros are not even talking much about the subject at hand so it's not even a resume.
Wow!!!!!! I’m literally fighting with my boss about this… I’m an ENFJ and I’m all about overview at work. And my boss is all about details… wow… I have never thought about this ever even with my knowledge of Myers Brigs
Did this help any of you guys change your type? Or help type your favorite youtubers? If so, feel free to share! Maybe we share some favorites and it will be fun to see if we came up with the same type. Heck, what is your favorite youtuber of each of the 16 types? Thanks for doing this, teacher Frank! You're my favorite INFJ for my list.
@@nesi_nesi_nesi Woah. Thanks! I have to look them up. Feel free to share more. I have around 400 subscriptions so I'd have to think about it for awhile so take your time!
@@bluebellbell3725 Sweet! Is that the channel? I'll check them out later when I get back! Your username rocks. I tried saying it 5 times fast and made..hey, I did it. I was going to joke that I couldn't do it. I'm going to go for 20! Feel free to keep tagging if you can think of ones for the other 14!
Thank you for this! The details make no sense until I know and understand the overview. Once I have the overview, I know where to place the details that follow in my head so that everything makes sense.
As a sensor… I want to say, intuitives don’t just “guess”. They are excellent at looking at trends and making a hypothesis based on the trend. If x=y Then we know that y will eventually be this. A lot of intuitives do great in the stock market. Whereas the sensors play by the book play safe.. not much risk takers.
There are far more sensors than intuitives in the population. The stock market wouldn’t survive with just intuitive investors. Since FJ didn’t explain details of what he meant by “guessing,” we don’t know which situations to apply it to.
@@andeeq666 I’m not saying sensors don’t invest. For goodness sakes, I invest. I’m just saying you will see intuitives take better risks. I have respect for intuitives.
Yes. This is how I argue with my sister and she said "Why we were arguing? The one you said, that's the point I was talking about!" When I knew very well she missed my points of how she should be specific about telling something so I won't misunderstood. She is an INFJ and I'm an ISTJ. I guess that N and S did made us arguing over the things that we shouldn't be argued, just because how she explains things differently that how I do.
10:47 yes, the guessing part is SO true. I’ve gotten in trouble sometimes for this , cause I was not paying attention, and just assume what the point of the other person is. - from an intuitive😂
One thing I respect about sensors is how they can practically get things done. In creative professions us intuitives will spend so much energy looking at the various angles that we burn ourselves out, meanwhile the sensor has already finished 3 projects.
Interesting thing about the Patterns vs. Events point: one time, a peer and I were doing this activity to determine what we would guess the price of certain grocery items was. We came to an example of where we were shown a purple bag of mozzarella cheese. I guessed it was the more expensive option out of the two prices we were given because cheese is oftentimes the most expensive part of a meal, comparing itself to carbs or bread, for example. (There’s a reason why Olive Garden serves so many bread sticks before getting to the meals with cheese it in. Bread is much less expensive than dairy products). Also, because the bag was purple, and purple is so rare in nature, it one of the most expensive colors to use (Hence why purple is the color of royalty, because royals were at one point only able to afford purple dye). Whereas, the other peer figured out that the price was actually the less expensive option solely because of the pattern that the first option was always correct. I did not even notice the pattern at all. In case you’re wondering, I’m an ISTJ, and the peer was an INTP.
I’m an ENFP, and I can do both outline and details (for a given value of details!) but I think where my Ne comes in is WHY. I prefer an overview because to get excited about the details I need to know why they’re exciting, and where they’re leading. I also didn’t think the S analogy was an analogy, it’s a simple comparison. I don’t think N analogies are confusing, at least to intuitors. I massively respect sensor’s ability to enjoy the detail and be in the present but I’m a sucker for a story and I need to see the bigger narrative to be fully invested in something. Thanks for reminding us when that can be a weakness, though, Frank! We do need to check the internal integrity of our stories!
I can clearly see you are an intuitive person due to the way you are explaining the differences. It was difficult to understand you since I am a sensor but I used my last brain cell to understand.
Some more fun differences: Sensing people: - Like to talk about life, and tell stories about WHAT they did, in great detail; and sometimes feel caught off guard by the cloudy topics Intuitors like to bring up. - Prefer slap-stick and other tangible forms of comedy, INSTEAD of things that require them to piece together funny connections, analogies, and metaphors that "just make sense". - (Extroverted) Like to spend more time outdoors engaging their physical senses through sports and recreation -- this is because it gives them a tangible story to talk about later, and it's the opposite of fiction/imagination. - Great at stating facts that are hard to disagree with, and reminding people of important things they may not have thought of. Intuiting people: - Like to talk about ideas, systems, philosophies, and what-ifs; and sometimes they feel annoyed when a Sensor is cataloguing every single event they did in a day. - Usually enjoy most forms of comedy, but especially anything that's clever, ironic, or anything that gives them the satisfaction of "figuring it out". You'll often see this when two Intuitives point at each other, wink, and say "Eeeeyyyy!" when they both get the joke. There is 100% a territory of "basic comedy" that turns Intuitors off because it required no thought or cleverness at all. - Prefer to find their recreation in fantasy, fiction, and anything that validates their sense of being "out of this world" because their heads are already in the clouds, so fiction is a comfortable place to be in. - Great at saying what everyone else was already thinking, and getting tons of Likes and validation for it from others. These are not exclusive to each side, but are common. INFP 👋
As an intuitive, I absolutely agree with this comedy business; I love dark humor, satire and metaphor/analogy/pun humor. Something that means something else, but is so open to interpretation that it's too generalized to be attacked outright, leaving it to be thought provoking. 'chefs kiss' This form of humor is the future.
Loved this video! Was an absolute comet ride through all the different sub-topics for this comparison. People often don't get that everyone uses everything, just some a bit more than others; so whenever they see an intuitive excessively worrying about every single detail one day out of a 100, they immediately think they were wrong and that they are probably sensors, and they just Scooby Doo'd their evil "intuitive" mask off.
11:49 no, because sensing types can't prepare for potential problems and can't adapt to possibilities if they don't take that logical leap. The intuitive can warn the sensor that the plan the proposed is likely to have concequences. The sensor will disregard those (lack of proof) despite many patterns from similar decisions (the sensor will always find ways to argue why this unique situation is different, so that precident doesn't apply ) The intuitive will be preparing for the 'inevitable' concequenses of the bad decision, while the sensor has dismissed the warning, only to not have a plan when the intuitive eventually winds up being right.
I think the guessing aspect is the reason intuitives often make big leaps: they are super focused on the ideal outcome and don't see the steps they need to reach it and that life isn't always ideal. Sensing types see it better, and tend to have more a stable life as a result, but often times miss out on opportunities because they don't think chasing them is realistic. I think both of them can learn that high aspirations and pragmatism can go hand in hand
Como INFJ do eneatipo 1, eu aprendi desde cedo a ser mais metódica para atingir meus objetivos e gosto de que as coisas sáiam do meu jeito, por isso prefiro atividades individuais do que em grupo.
I think what you said makes a lot of sense . I've always wondered why the intuitives I know are a bit delusional when it comes to pursuing romantic relationships. I think they get so excited about finding their ideal person and relationship that they often don't gauge people's personality or interest level in them accurately.
As an ENFP when you talked about guessing it made me think of all the nights spent thinking about all the possible and impossible life forms on other planets,even when it makes no sense 😅
I'm definitely more on the N side, but tests usually show me as pretty close on the whole N vs S scale. I've had a lot of trouble with both types when it comes to actually DOING things though. when they get to their extremes S types can get so bogged down in details that they'll never actually start a project, or they'll make it way more complicated than it needs to be by constantly ironing out these details. then when something goes wrong it throws the entire project off because it affects the other details. then on the other side, when N types go to their extremes their plans become unreasonable, making grand plans but never going over key details, then getting overwhelmed when those big issues come up that they didn't see coming.
How interesting! I'm mostly INFJ but never realized how much I integrate Sensing into my Intuitive evaluation. I rely on 'getting the pig picture' really quickly and then zoom in on the facts to make the impression more concrete/justifiable. To be able to explain it. As more and more 'details' roll in, they refine my impression. The pattern breaks apart into sub-patterns until it gets all the variants. I have a Sensing-main friend with whom I almost exclusively adopt a fact-based discourse, and then I mix it up with others or adapt. In my circles, I'm among the top in perceptive and it makes sense. You get an advantage if something forces you to use both ways all of the time.
I think we’re around sensors so much it becomes a learned behaviour. The world is full of sensors so it’s kind of hard not to pick up those characteristics.
Watch "Why Each of the 16 Personalities are DANGEROUS" next! 👉 infj.me/3MARdl2
Let me know what other concepts you'd like me to explain like this one 🧡
I can think of lots of reasons…
-INTJ
Hi
Mwa
Idea for a comedy sketch: the 16 personalities on fear factor a reality tv show where contestants are put up against their biggest fears
Continuing on this super clear and comprehensive video, the further explanation and comparison of the four perceptive functions (Se vs. Ne vs. Si vs. Ni) would be an awesome next episode for this topic! 😉
Intuitives: It's almost 3:40 pm
Sensing: It's actually 3:38 pm
Uhh i'm guilty of this one 💀
#accurate
And I’ll be replying « yeah yeah it’s almost 4pm, it’s the same » (need to stop doing this but when they go into too much details with the time , I feel the need to tease and reply this way 😭）
Brilliant.
no
If you think about it, personality types existing is basically intuitives realizing you can categorize people in a very specific way -ENTP
Wild thought
Myers Briggs are INFPs, of course, the Si on their 3rd stack will put the Jungian typology that full of abstract into details. Fi or Ti are categorizing functions.
I thought the same lol
- ENFJ
I thought that too haha. That is one of the reasons why mbti was so interesting to me because it explained all these patterns I noticed since I was a child but I never had any words for them in a way ^^
@@JellyIsland Fellow Big Brain 🧠😆
Frank proves himself as an intuitive every time he tries to come up with an example to explain something, and fails miserably lol😂
As if somebody non-inuitive could entertain all 16 types and produce consistent video content pertaining to it.
@@levigivens this is a very closed mind take
@@talareese580 how contrary of you. To do exactly what you've accused me of. The irony.
@@levigivens no, her statement was correct, yours was not
@@levigivens plenty of Sensing youtubers out there. in fact, sensing types have a way better chance at entertaining all 16 types, since what they talk about is relatable for everyone.
INTJ here:
What you call overview, I call context. I LOVE context! Knowing the big picture, and the things that lead up to a topic are pretty much my favorite thing ever! As long as it isn’t too detailed, obviously. Take too long to get to the point, and you’ve lost me. 😆
INTJ. When I tell someone something that happened to me, I start with the conclusion and then jump to the context, everything that led to that situation. I also don’t give a lot of details, for example I usually don’t name the people who participated because I don’t want to bore them and I know they’re not even going to remember, so why bother? In other words, only tell context and conclusion
@@david34nl96 sameee
periodt
yass whenever someone starts a story I ask so many Qs to get the context
"take too long to get to thr point, and you've lost me" thats me right here (also INTJ)
however, now I need everyone in my life to know this too.
I am an INFP, so i'm part of the intuitive types. I really like it when things are summarized because i get easily bored when they're too detailed. For me it is "Go straight to the point and please don't make so much speculations and details. Just say what you want to say no need for too much details". And that's why i struggle a lot when having conversations with my sensing friends. I easily lose interest on what they're saying and i just have to act like i listen to them.😭
I have also same problem. is there any majic solution for this hell?
Same- Though when I really care about something I think I do use my Si quite a bit, but otherwise I'm like this. I definitely don't use my Si often, just occasionally.
Oh my God, having to act like you're listening to the painful level of detail! Agh, no kidding!
@@amannadeem78 I really don't know😭
Same!
I am an ENFJ and my gf is ISFJ, she often gets confused when I talk in metaphors, I express my love by writing poems and she does it with beautiful letters. It’s like seeing and doing same things but in different perspectives. It’s very beautiful.
That’s adorable
@@illegalsubstance953 Thank you 😇
That's so cool! I'm an infp and I love writing abstract poems with many metaphors. Getting letters sounds so lovely. It's like you said, the same general thing but different in execution
as an S, I totally don't get it when a high N person gets all abstract. I hear you on this.
@@Thefitty Everybody has their strengths and weaknesses, we can help each other and grow, thats the beauty in having a relationship with a different type than yours. But at the same time having something common is important too, otherwise it is hard to understand each at times. In my case she has the same level of emotional intensity. The love and care we have is magical.
Frank's giggles can't be missing in his videos, they are his trademark 😎
The fact he giggled right after i read this tho
Yeah cuz he can't feel good for himself cuz he doesn't have Fi, he has to make the audience feel good with Fe and a sprinkle of Se
@Moondust yeah
*aha ha*
I love the FJ giggles!
I am INFJ married to ISFJ. That one little change in the second letter makes all the difference in the world. I live in the future, she lives in the present. I love theoretical frameworks, she likes concrete facts. I can learn (Frank didn’t mention this) by playing out scenarios in my mind. She learns by doing things and trying alternatives. We deal with these differences every day.
bro me too, i learn by playing scenarios in my head, just need to see it couple times, then i just think what i am going to do and how, and when, im really proud of this ''
power'' lmao
Married INFJ! You caught my attention in the first few words 😂 but totally spot on 😊
It's an interesting oddity that the ones who are the opposite of yourself seem to be in extreme separation, but in reality, those who share a small portion of similarities end up being in greater conflict with our own personal visions of how we interact with the world.
So many scenarios in my head all the time. Lol. I'm an INFJ.
If you'll excuse me, how would you describe your relationship, especially since your Mbti are INFJ & ISFJ? (I am interested in knowing the relationship between these two Mbti in real life🌞)
As an INTJ, this feels like such a call out 😭 This is a reoccurring problem of mine: I make a broad assertion, and when others inevitably ask for details, I literally don't remember anything. I don't remember WHY exactly I made the conclusion, it just pops up, and if I say it out loud, I have to commit. My brain likes to assume things and then argue them, but it's impossible to argue when you can't recall any evidence 😂
Omg I can relate to that more than any other thing he said in the video
Same man... its so bad. Like you literally cant remember a specific example. But the sensors pretty much NEED it. But we sure can talk overview for hours.
Infp here, so true 😅
I am a huge pattern seer and will follow on that pattern until I hit a brick wall. Typically, this approach serves me well but sometimes I can convince myself something is some way and will eventually realize I have wandered out of reality and into the weeds and I am totally wrong. It is so jarring to be hit with reality. But mostly my intuition serves me well.
as an ISTP, it's soo true. I've never been able to summarize stuff and always jumped into details first. the details would pile up, connect and give you the context. My dad is an N (probably INFJ) and he always asks me to summarize lmaooo. My ISFJ mom too gets into too much details even with random strangers like- lmaooo
I'm an INTJ and I agree LOL. When I go the library I skim through the titles and look at the quotes and read the summary at the back to judge the content of a book. When I read a book I love to start out at the preface.
When I'm doing Maths I pick out different questions instead of repeatedly doing similar questions. I love contextual and cross topic questions.
I always think "if such and such and such... THEREFORE"
if.. then.. else..
Agreed, I'm an INFJ and the questions in maths that you clearly see the pattern and you need to do really familiar problems are so boring to me, like I get the concept why do dozens of exact same ones..
And when I'm reading a book I like the moment when I finally find out the ending so I can see the whole story clearly. The overview is very important to me.
INTJ as well and when I go to the library I tend to explore the whole building before picking a section browse. 😅
I'm an infp and this whole video is so accurate to me. I love creating and speaking in metaphors / analogies especially when I study for school and try to understand a topic. Mnemonics are very helpful (the more abstract the better lol). Also I love to catagorize my favorite movies, books or songs etc. I actually have many playlists for different moods but it was very annoying to add the songs (I guess that was the detail part). When my mom (isfj) tells me about a book she talkes about every little detail that I think I've read the book by myself in the end and I'm like "I just want to know what the story is about. Can't you tell me a short summary?"
As an INFP, my mind naturally creates mnemonics out of nothing for almost every silly thing in my life. I use music _as_ mnemonics to relate to the various personalities of the people in my life, similar to how Loony Toons used different instruments to describe the behaviors of each character -- and it all just happens naturally, it isn't something I do intentionally.
I'm INFP and I have the exact same problem about adding songs to playlists 😆
😂😂😂😂 Estou rindo alto, porque esta última parte da sua história bateu forte aqui em casa.
Minha mãe também é ISFJ e confesso que é um saco conversar com ela, as vezes.
Os sensores tem uma dificuldade de resumir a conversa. Sempre que peço para minha mãe me dizer sobre o que se trata um filme, ela sempre acaba me contando o filme inteiro...haja paciência!
Sempre achei que isso fosse um mal costume de criação dela, porque minha avó, que é uma ESFJ, também é outra que gosta de prolongar a conversa mais do que necessário.
Mas agora percebo que isso é coisa de sensores mesmo.
Já cheguei a ficar tão irritada que precisei sair da sala para não ter que ouví-la.#OMG
PRECISO SER MAIS PACIENTE!
@@GrafinVonHopper can you write your comment in english again? I don't speak spanish
Omg I also ask people to summarize what they are saying and I'm also INFP!!!
Out of all the Letters, N and S were always the ones that showed up almost interchangeably in my results. Depending on the test, the explanation or examples given, or even the time of the year, I’d lean S or N. In percentage based tests, I’d be pretty close in the middle for both of these. I think I understand why now. It seems that I am a sensing type who also quite often applies the imaginative aspect when necessary. I love patterns and structures and categories and analogies, but if something doesn’t actually fit the pattern, I do insist on re-examining the entire context or concept in order to get a more factually precise pattern. Another clue is probably that I get really irritated by vagueness, inaccuracy and unnecessarily repetitive information.
Oh my God this describes me exactly. Also, whenever I take the sixteen personalities test, my N and S percentages are very close; one will be 49 the other 51!
You should definitely look into cognitive functions. They'll help you figure out what type you are; online tests aren't reliable - especially ones that only use letter dichotomies
Usually that means you are probably an IxxP or an ExxJ because their intuitive and sensing cognitive functions are closer together
Same same same, you explained it so much better than I could. I hate vagueness too like why can't you just gimme the details.
@@alinaqirizvi1441 Thank you. Analyzing all the tests I've done I think I am INTP.
I am an ESFP with a brother who is ENFP. What I love about the dynamic is that being an extroverted sensor I tend to focus too much on how life is going right now, rather than where it could be in a years time. When I get stuck in that rut I can’t see beyond what is happening yet my brother comes in with all these other possibilities and the bigger picture that helps me to not feel so trapped.
Then in my brother’s case, he is super disorganised and I’m pretty good at sorting things out and getting them done now. I’m quick to react to things going on around us, where as it takes him a while to process what has just happened
As someone who is pretty close to the middle between intuitive and sensing, this has been very informative.
same im in betweenn entp and estp
ya samee I'm an ISFP but the S is like 52%
I have grown up in a family with all sensors and I’m an INTJ. I don’t usually enjoy talking about the same things they do, I find it so boring. I want to theorize, imagine and discuss scenarios, but they want to talk about all the facts about how family and friends are doing and how their work is going and so on and so forth. It’s not that I don’t care, it’s just that we could spend 5 minutes on it, then we can talk about other stuff. But you can’t really choose your family, so it’s just something I have to live with. And a rare time I run into someone who is interested in the same stuff that I am, an INTJ or INFJ or ENFP, and it feels like I’m capable of chatting with people as well.
Sou INFJ e me identifico totalmente com seu relato. Também cresci numa família de sensores que me fizeram me sentir inadequada por ser quem sou. A sensação de incompreensão sempre foi abundante.
Penso que meus relacionamentos significativos serão apenas com intuitivos daqui para frente.
The longer this went on, the more sense it made. Sometimes I'll vent to my dad about the week, giving a general summary about my feelings or experiences, but no matter how well I think I explained my thoughts, he'll always ask for examples. It used to really upset me- why can't you just take my word for how I'm feeling, why do I have to prove the legitimacy of my problems to you- but this really puts some of those experiences into perspective. 👍✨
Great explanation! I also think sensors have a better time at expressing their imagination or feelings. Intuitives have a hard time expressing it. It’s like “I have a lot of ideas and in my mind these look great” but when the time comes to express it, Intuitives find it a difficult task. Sensors on the other hand, they know exactly how and when they can portray their imagination. So I think that sometimes sensors are great artist and are really assertive. also is the reason why Intuitives tend to stress when they have to talk about their feelings or portray their imagination, because sometimes they don’t even understand themselves 😅
I agree. I doubted myself if I’m really intuitive (I’m INTP) because my ideas are big/simple and can’t seem materialize as imagined. So turns out this is common intuitive problem. Possible the thing we imagine is actually impossible to exist in reality even in words. For us the ideas are like starting an artwork from white canvas, you don’t know where to start. I think sensors can express better because they base their ideas/feelings from what exists.
@@kunogi09midori I also agree with you. As an INTP I think a lot and imagine most of the time of my day but when it comes to express my thoughts I mess up things and end up telling something weird on the other hand who is an ISTP can express her thoughts very easily.
I'm not so sure of that. I'm an INFP and usually have an easier time understanding the quick ramblings and strange connections of an intuitive than the onslaught of details that a sensor fires at me. Talking with with other person is like putting together a puzzle. When a sensor tries to explain something to me, a lot of times they throw at me a bunch of pieces (=facts) in an amorphous lump without the frame (=context) saying "Here, take this photo, what do you think?" while I'm looking at the pile thinking "What image? I only see a chaos of pieces and nothing else."
not really... i know how to express my feelings and my points most of the time because i understand them(i think it's more like you have more T or F, personal opinion), it's just that i will decide to express it or not by depending on the situation. but you have a point tho, sometimes i just have some weird thoughts and imagination that i can't even explain how i get this imagination. like boom wow, here it is. why this? please don't question. unlimited imagination. btw i am a high N here so yeah...
I’m an INTJ, and I really love using analogies when explaining something and in my approaches. Like how studying accounting (im an Accountancy student) made me realize that a business entity can be related to an organism. I’m aware that the analogies I have may be bizarre at first glance, but I just see a connection between the essence of things.
It makes me happy to see this; I've always described things this way.
@@dante7817 Im interested what weird analogies you have? Maybe I could use some too!! Im really glad when I find out im not the only one who does it
my brain only works in analogies 😂
This is how I study for tests, I make everything into an analogy 🤣
as an ISFP, this explain a lot of my "such as?" in every deep convo i've had. I need facts and examples.
Fr
I was unsure if I was INTJ or ISTJ when I first started to get into MBTI but I identify a lot more with intuition than sensing (I took a cognitive functions test and scored much higher on intuition than sensing and I got the function stack of INTJ). I am a big picture observer and often miss details. I absolutely LOVE patterns and find them in almost anything. I’ve been told to get my head out of the clouds since I prefer the abstract world over the sensory world. And I’ve been told that a lot of what I say is confusing (even tho it makes perfect sense to me). I also am extremely future oriented and love to try and predict the future based on what I know
INTJ here and same. When I started getting into MBTI I didn't really know the difference between sensing and intuition and I totally thought I was a person of facts but turns out I'm not. I just didn't know myself so well back then. I'm living inside my head so much that I often miss details, especially the ones about the sensory world. But what made me understand I'm an intuitive is definitely the pattern thing. I love patterns and I find them easily in anything. I've also often been the kind of person who goes like "it's obvioulsy going to happen this thing" and then the thing happened. And it was just so easy to foresee because it was all about pattern but other people seemed not to see that. It's just natural to me.
Yep I’m definitely a sensor. I know because every time you try to explain something I’m like “Give me an example. A concrete example”
no bc this is so me and i didn't even realise it 😭
im an intp and my friend is an istp. in 8th grade, we had to write a 3-4 page double-spaced short story, but my friend was struggling a lot because she kept adding too many details. it got to the point where the introduction of her “short” story was 5 pages long, she ended up starting over and was still struggling to limit her story to only 4 pages. i was basically the opposite of her.
As an INFP, I synthesize too much. Maybe that's why I absolutely hate to make a biography of someone because there's no core idea, just a bunch of facts and details and I never know what I should talk about and I overthink it to no end lmao.
In high school I had required reading of the classic book Silas Marner. The first few chapters were nothing but details/descriptions of the setting of the story. It took forever to get into the actual story.
I found this helpful because I just broke off a relationship with another intuitive. It took awhile for me to see he was emotionally abusive because the specific abusive behaviors (and "small" deceits) didn't fit the category I put him in as a good, caring person. The downside of having any kind of tunnel vision (N or S), especially when relating to others, is that we can miss sifting through information that's truly significant when forming a more realistic perspective about someone.
You can tell Frank is an intuitive because he can never think of a real-life example to explain what his big-picture idea means in real life! You can also tell I am an intuitive because the sentence before made sense in my head but probably not in real life bc I’m overlooking the details of how to write a real sentence.
I always end up mistyping people because of my confusion between intuition and sensing,, so this helped a bunch ! thanks FJ !
As someone who tested 87% intuitive, this was hilariously spot on. And it's illuminated some of my recent work problems 🤔 (especially with a sensing-type superior)
I/ENFJ here who works closely with an ISTP. I got into your videos after an MBTI staff development day to try to improve our communication. (Some of the comedy sketches are almost word for word conversations we've had haha!) Something I've found fascinating: we are both detail-oriented and visionary, but with different priorities. I am detail-oriented about the future and communication, and visionary about patterns, categorizing, and reading into emotional context. My coworker is detail-oriented about the concrete present and visionary about ultimate goals. Probably 80% of the time we talk past each other, it's that.
I have often seen Frank James being described as an INFJ (an intuitive) but I have so often also sense a bias against intuitives in his videos that I think it must be a self-defense mechanism. However, as an intuitive I hate to admit it but he's accurate in this video. And yes, I am aware I am doing the 'intuitives thing' with my opening comment 😆
internalized homophobia
Its probs also cause there is usually a bias against sensors so he’s evening it out
@@lilyflynn6086 Hi Lily, I was at least 50% trying to be ironic with my comment :P And being intuitives I guess it does give FJ and myself license to poke fun at ourselves. I have a lot of respect for sensors; they are so grounded unlike intuitives who tend to live in their heads more. The only thing about sensors is that they can sometimes take things too literally or they need things explained to them very specifically. It's kinda like intuitives are like the Platonists while sensors are like the Aristotelians. There is nothing wrong with either side; we are just different :)
He’s not an INFJ though:/
@@Shayne_T I have no idea what personality type he is. I have only seen a lot of people describe him as INFJ.. He doesn't look like an INFJ to me too 😂 He looks to me more like an ENFP.
The analogy part is so spot on. I always compare stuff to get my point across quickly but so many people counter with "You absolutely cannot compare those things!". This is especially true when trying to debate someone in a comment section where summarizing is so valuable because space and time are limited. If I have to go into the details, I'm outta there lol
if you're extremely confused as to whether you're "intuitive" or "sensing" because you relate to different aspects of both so much, it's time to learn about cognitive functions. ExxJ and IxxP types are not super controlled by their N function or S function. we have it relatively balanced. this is why i you see lots of ESxJs making generalizations and IxNPs correcting things for the sake of nuance. the order of our cognitive functions explain this. it's all about preference and some preferences are heavier than others
As an ISTP who is the DM for a Ghostbusters RPG, it blows my mind how my INFJ friend can take two facts her character learned in the game and spin them into a grand overview of the entire situation. Occasionally it’s incredible how right she is! Other times, she’s waaay off base, but unfortunately she doesn’t reshape her view of the fictional situation as more facts are discovered, and is also extremely persuasive-so she can convince the other players to all also believe her theory. 😋
As an infp, I am very particular about the details and get stressed when the details are wrong, even the little ones. I also love seeking the truth and facts, what is real and what is not. This made me second-guessed my type again, some of them does not describe me haha
Enneagram could be part of it. As an INFP with enneagram 5 I think it brings out the more "thinker" side than expected
If you study function stacks, infps can get very tripped up on their Te function and using it as a crutch. I am infp and I use math and facts as a security blanket, but after awhile it becomes very unsatisfying
Omg this is literally me😭 but at the same time whenever I'm telling a story I feel like I forget a lot of specific details so I'm really confused
@@blizpix That actually makes a lot of sense - an INFP
@@cbcimutebi5564 Exactly! I’m telling a story but since I can't remember all the details I'm like what was his name again??
Hello! I am an ENFJ and the analogy thing is 10000% SO TRUE. You didn't confuse me you actually cleared some things up.
I feel this when being introduced to a table top game and I need a personal guide to play the game.
Beautifully explained!
As an ENTJ I have butt heads many times with my ESTJ colleagues because of my preference for intuition. It stresses me out to actually bother focusing on the details but when it comes to consulting, perhaps the detail is particularly important. Nevertheless, it's a pain to watch people obsess with the detail and not realise the opportunities lost or the anticipated issues just because it hasn't happened yet, as my 'guesses' tend to be pretty accurate.
That’s why it’s important to have both to complete a project with proper tasks assigned to everyone. With only intuitives it will work but the lack of details might weaken the project. And only sensors well, the project may lack long term vision or take too much time to start.
As an INTJ I understood early that details were important, but I can’t bother it’s just so boring. I just delegate to someone who enjoy taking care of it (if possible).
As an ENTJ my experience with the S-types in worklife is that they are more prone to stick to whatever the data tells them currently, even if you yourself can see the pattern, sniff out risk and act preventively.
Very frustrating.
Ofc details are important and should be factual, but my god the myopia!
This comment is so impactful - as an ENTJ I am constantly lumped in with ESTJ’s and I feel like we could not be more different.
I am not a fan of sensor thinkers - they are completely devoid of imagination and too risk-averse
Soooo, all throughout this video us N types were basically called aloof and based on supposition. Not necessarily true, since as we know we both look at facts AND rely on intuition but one thing is sure: In general we have a higher affinity for the abstract, metaphysical and spiritual, which is a very important aspect of life that is quite undervalued.
omg this explains so much, I always get comments along the lines of "explain further" or "give examples" on my essays back when I was in school and I'm like why?! 🤣
As an ENFP, I fit the description of intuitives with the first part. I don't understand why anyone would start a project without an outline. Whenever I write a story, I need to have the theme, and a general plot planned out from start to finish. I may or may not stick to my plan, but I need to see the big picture to even know where to start on something.
For the second part, I can be very detail oriented when it comes to facts. My Ti blindspot hates subjective logic, so I really think it's a Te thing rather than a sensor thing. I notice false things easily. My ISFJ stepmom very evidently used Ti and only cares if something "makes sense" even if there's something wrong with it. To her, as long as it's similar enough to reality and can be understood, it's good. Not for me.
For the third, fourth, and fifth part, I definitely care more about patterns and connections than wrong information. What you mentioned about sensors needing to give examples, I relate to, but only because I have a fear of being misunderstood. I definitely use analogies. New information is useless unless it can be related to older information (Ne and Si working together) so I tend to use analogies, but sometimes they are only relevant to me because of my unique past experiences that not everyone can relate to.
For the sixth part, I'm not especially good at making predictions, but I definitely like guessing and I am good at following one thing to another. I got good at algebra because I could extrapolate non-obvious information from an equation and get a general idea of the mechanics of the equation. Sometimes I have a hard time sorting through the sea of details and coming to a concrete answer however.
For the seventh part, I definitely relate when you mentioned about imagining future outcomes. I have far too many plans to account for random possibilities that would rely on very slim odds. I also can't stop myself from imagining how a situation could have turned out and I panic whenever I realize I get lucky because I imagine so many negative outcomes that I realize how close something bad was to happening. I have to tell myself the past is the last, but what if something identical happens again and the negative outcome happens?
Anyways, thank you for confirming I am indeed an intuitive.
Edit: I just realized how I put this into way more words than necessary 💀
Its nice to see a random person on the internet who describes me perfectly .
I meannn how are you sooo good abt these? tbvh i learnt so much abt myself and typology from you than any other sources
I feel like the intuition "guessing" aspect in N types sometimes can get a bit insane. Like even tho I'm INFP many times when i get a "gut" feeling about something I try to tell myself to be more rational, to wait, to see the facts, and many times that "gut" feeling is indeed proven right despite not seeming to be logical (once i stop and try to think about WHY i had that guy feeling i can list the reasons i couldn't express in words before)
Totally relatable! Whenever I have to guess something, I discard the first guess as it seems as more of a gut feeling than reasonable and speak aloud the second or third or whatever seems the most logical after weighing the facts but most of the time my first guess is right or closest to the truth. All those times, when at at school I would make a guess and the one I thought first but didn't say would be indeed the right answer: Dang it!
I'm an infp and these gut feelings are the things I trust most tbh. I always pay attention to it and follow my heart ... which sounds really cheesy but it's true haha
@@driheart SAME
@@driheart Same here. Usually my gut feeling is right but I don't understand how and doubt myself so I have to go on an investigation to find out whether I was right or just making the wrong assumption. Drives me nuts when I'm stressed though haha
Also an infp and same about the gut feelings. It's creepy how accurate that gut feeling is.
Best explanation of Intuition vs Sensing! I feel like I finally understand! I love how you always have a sense of humor about it. 🙌🏻 😀
That first insight is so huge for me - I just can't understand when people start an explanation with all the details without giving me the overarching context. Makes me both confused and irritated.
I think the overview of important that’s why I’m traditional writing there’s always a topic sentence to start a paragraph. It does give context!
INFP here, I can tell, that at work I‘m into details but also having the „big picture“ in the back of my mind. I trained for this. I had to learn to combine both things, and I‘m still improving to gain balance. I can tell that‘s an exhausting way.
This explains why I'm not good at writing summaries (ISFP)
Honestly same (ISTP)
I’m good at writing summary in school work but when talking about myself I love to go into detail would this make me an infp
As infj with adhd, i always was shamed of my esays looking numb because i jumped to conclusions i made first and then facts. And istj teacher HATTEEEDDD IT.
I'm an INFJ too and I have the same problem. I have a general idea of what I'm writing about and I'm trying to explore it, but we have to give examples and I'm getting lost in all the details and I don't know how to put it together to match my vision..
You should do a video on a group of friends who are all infj's! I think it would be interesting to say the least. I'm an infj and have a few acquaintances who are infj's. I was wondering what it would be like if we were all in the same room talking and how that conversation would look like. Appreciate your content! Your channel is one of my favorites!
This is definitely a good idea💡 as even though you are all INFJs you wont do things the same so we'll get to see various textures and layers to this type. Would definitely be a good idea for each MBTI type too (-INFP)
Please do J vs P I have no idea what’s that about. Love your content btw ❤️❤️👏
INTJ. Knowing X, Y, Z, W, U, V is neat. Seeing that X usually leads to Y and W leads to U and V is a bit more neat. Realizing that W prevents X but still encourages Y but less than X with the bonus results of V and U one of which feeds back into W, perpetuating the process, and the other separately acts to increase the probability that Z will happen while decreasing the likelihood of X more than W does…
It’s seeing the Rube Goldberg machinery of the universe. It’s the stuff that makes quantum reality and macro reality seem less separate distinct existences governed by disparate rules and more the unified whole they are.
yes! i watched some physicist dudes talk about how they didn't know how quantum mechanics lead to macro physics and i understood it immediately. it's like pointillist paintings (ex, Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte featured in ferris bueller's day off), there's many tiny dots doing their own thing but as you pull out they lose distinctness, and you mostly see the larger image they're working together to construct. but the dots don't go away, they're still there, doing their funny little dot things.
ok you've sold me. I am an intuitive and thought I was superior but I can see the strengths of my sensing partner.
BUT the intuitive wants to be free to expand and talk and can't find this opportunity in sensing so god help us
Good stuff! Now I know why having to make a detailed outline of my report was so arduous in school. I just wanted to give a broad overview and figure out all the details later when I actually wrote it. And when public speaking I just jot down a few key points and then I can just link it all together in the moment. Having to write every word of a speech beforehand would be detestable. I’m always categorizing. But I get bogged down and paralyzed when i can’t see all the categories or which category every item fits into. Getting, and staying, organized is hard. Now that I’m older I realize it’s counterproductive to constantly guess what’s coming next because I am missing details! So I’ve had to learn to stop myself from guessing and just focus and listen to what the other person is actually saying.
Thanks FJ! -ENFP
My problem with outlines was the opposite. Every fact ended up being its own point. Too many points in the outline. My categories ended up a list of facts and summaries weren't very summarizing.
You are the only one to clarify this so easily for me to understand I’m Intuitive over sensing.
It's funny, this actually corresponds to my two biggest frustrations in conversation: people who go off on unnecessary tangents all the time and can't get to the point (intuitives), and people who keep shoving in unnecessary details which genuinely don't matter and make the whole thing a drag to listen to (sensors). I love both types of people (and I'm pretty sure I'm guilty of the same things sometimes!), but man, I really wish words were used more efficiently, lol
Ne dominant types love tangents (ENTP, ENFP) most of all. You sound like someone with Te in slot 1 or 2. As an INTJ I can say "unnecessary" tangents wear me out almost as much as accuracy at the expense of action (ISTP, INTP).
Mas os intuitivos vão sim direto ao ponto. Quem rodeia até chegar ao ponto são os sensores.
Them: "So I ran into Larry -- Lanny? Larry? Yeah, I think his name is Larry. Or is it Lanny?"
Me: It doesn't matter!!!!! Just keep going!
Them: "So anyway, Larry - or Lanny -- he used to live in that old house by the Thompson farm -- you know it --- yes, you do --- they used to grow blueberries in the summer, and blackberries too, I think?? Because we went out there and picked blueberries and I think we picked blackberries, too. Although maybe the blackberries we picked was that time we drove up to Bloomerville to that berry farm, remember that? And..."
Me: But what about Larry?
I always thought I was a sensor but it turns out I’m actually a intuitive after a lot of researching and learning about each functions. Thanks for this video FJ. You’ve really helped a lot ❤
Do you know what your mbti type is?
@@luiiiandmovieee infp
@@Leazha08 cool, me too!
@@luiiiandmovieee aye that’s nice 😊
For all the stupid Instagram accounts that literally ignore the sensors, pretending they don't exist or something.
I think the sensors are way too underestimated among the mbti community. :/
And intuitives are underestimated in real life (because where their strengths lie often can’t be directly-seen unless you know them intellectually). It balances-out.
They can’t help it if they know nothing about sensors and are intimidated.
@@andeeq666 intimidated by who?
@@Anonymous_Anon882 they said the word “sensor” use your intuition
@@hermianix8919 okay, dumbo.
As an istp true I prefer to trial n error n go into the details first then create an overview
.. sometimes. Lots of times i learn kinesthetically and sometime I get really confused when something isnt concrete or specific enough.. i do have intuition and imagination despite not relying on it most the time 😎😎😎
The overview thing is accurate. When I tell friends a story, I give the overall gist first then along the way I remember to add details that matter. In my view they should get it because I’ve given them the context where whatever detail I remember to add can obviously fit into.
Exatamente. Sabendo do que se trata, fica mais fácil de imaginar o que pode ocorrer em ir discutirão os detalhes. Eu acho que os sensoriais são muito robotizados e sem nenhuma imaginação...😒
"Or at least they feel good about guessing even if they got a track record of being wrong "
Your words cut deep, deeper than any blade
I really needed this video cuz whenever I take a mbti test the intuition and sensing part alternate between 51%ish and 49%ish
But I love binary things and getting a summary before indulging into the specifics and I definitely LOVE patterns and to categorize things and don’t love to have subdivisions or nuance things (like controversial topics) that I can’t figure in which category they r
This is interesting reflecting on my job and my work relationship with my manager - I am an INFJ and my supervisor/manager is an ISTJ (we are both lawyers)- we have different ways approaching cases but we both really appreciate attention to detail.
I honestly think that the reason intuitives will summarize information because we tend to, or at least, I tend to filter out what I want the other person/audience to know, without wasting mine or theirs time. I will only give details if others are interested in the topic or they will need it later on. - INTP
Omg the analogy part is so relatable… I’m an intuitive type and I’m always making the most random extensive analogies that make so much sense in my brain, but no one else gets it bc my brain makes absolutely no sense
Tangents is the key to look for. I'm intuitive. I realised years ago when talking to sensors they were getting frustrated because I just can't help going off on tangents in every conversation. I noticed that whenever I am conversing with someone who goes off on tangents I am indeed speaking to an intuitive.
E o que seria "sair pela tangente"? Porque se tiver relacionado com rodeios e detalhes insignificantes, definitivamente eu não me encaixo, porque gosto de ir direto ao ponto.
But don't people go into tangents ehen they are trying to get all the facts straight? Like recalling petty details like the name of a person or road or town and eho was there and why etc.?
Im an INTJ.. and i can say proudly that my instinct has been saving my life so far
I act like a sensor when I’m in an Fi-Si loop (obviously!). I recently got out of it after 2-3 years and it feels so refreshing seeing deeper than the surface. The tangible and objective is b o r i n g.
что ещё другого ожидать от инфп
I’m intuitive (intj) and I really need to learn how to use this sensor power. It might bring way more depth in everything I do on a daily. I usually go pretty well into details concerning work stuffs, when I need to make everything perfect. But if you ask me to tell you my day, tell a story or give my impressions on a book… one sentence and I’m done. Managing sensor function is needed in social situations especially if you need to get something out from them.
In all categories Frank struggling to give examples as a sensor is the cutest thing
I didn’t notice any examples.
@@andeeq666 yeah because he was struggling w/ the examples, he couldn't think of any in the given moment bc he's an intuitive type too (INFP)
Yea he already figure about what the meaning is already but can’t but it in simplified words to tell us why.
This makes so much sense. I'm N, my husband is S, and I am seeing how these descriptions have played out in our communication. It can make bumps in sorting things out, but can also be really beneficial for balancing each other's weak points.
Same here I’m N .. INTP
And my fiancé seems to be S
I’m worried he won’t be able to understand me but I think as you said that will help my weak S.
how is the relationship going?
@@blackbat121 coming up on our 15th anniversary, and still very much in love :)
We're no strangers to love
You know the rules and so do i
A full commitment's what i'm thinking of
You wouldn't you get this from any other guy
I just wanna tell you how i'm feeling
Gotta make you understand
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
We've known each other for so long
Your heart's been aching but you're too shy to say it
Inside we both know what's been going on
We know the game and we're gonna play it
And if you ask me how i'm feeling
Don't tell me you're too blind to see
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you
INFJ here. Categorizing and Summarizing things solves two issues. One, it takes a lot of data, or it takes an overwhelming concept and breaks it down to more manageable parts. It's more efficient.
Two, it dumbs down concepts for other people. Lol. Same with the analogy - it makes it easier for other people to understand.
I do all three all the time. (I used to be an early childhood educator, and for the last 24 years have been explaining complex business and technical requirements to IT folks).
Okay, now I am 100% sure finally that I'm an intuitive I just hate giving examples and categories are always a huge part for me. I was always confused bc I like facts but also over review and theories and moving around dancing and going to gym.
We used to differentiate our global (intuitive) learners from our anayltical (learners) when i was teaching. This is so spot on. Global learners need to see the big picture first and then move to the details; the analytical learners, of course, are the opposite. Analytical learners deduce. I'm an ENFJ I think - thing is that my N and S are split evenly., so can function as ESFJ too I guess.
ENFJs and ESFJs have different cognitive functions though. First using Se and second using Si
@@_Celine_26 Since I'm 50% S and 50% N, am wondering if go back and forth using Se and Si? Is that how it works?
@@bethtaylor9773 the website 16 personalities (since you're mentioning percentages I take it that you used that one) makes it look like it's E vs I, S vs N, T vs F and P vs J but MBTI is actually about cognitive functions, not letters. So ENFJs have Fe as their primary function, Ni as auxiliary, Se as their tertiary and Ti as inferior function. Maybe your tertiary function is just well developed. Se is about living in the now, focusing on the outside world and getting information through one's senses. Does that seem like something that you do well, thus making you interpret this as being 50% a senser?
@@_Celine_26 lol! I don't really know. I did order the book Gifts Differing - maybe I need to give that try.
O:
As an ENFJ, I know I'm a Single Decider (Fe), but I'm a Double Observer (Ni and Se).
Right.
You could explain J/P parameter. To me it makes sense only when you know cog functions, but not really without them. At least I don't understand what would they be for except for distinguishing if a person's two top functions are extraverted perceiving and introverted judging or vive versa.
To be honest, the unreasonable, underestimation of the sensors by the American mbti community combined with the first difference the video shows, "overview / details" gave me a déjà vu from when I sent my art portfolio to an American studio, as they pointed out as “negative aspects” the fact I draw details, shades and light, while what they want is mainstream, simplified and flat caricatures and vectors because "they are easy to sell". But in Europe, I am hired as an illustrator a lot exactly because I don't follow the caricature simplified pattern and they seem to appreciate my lighting and details. So...maybe the underrating stereotype is a cultural thing? Who knows...
In my country we are also very philosophical and we enjoy analyzing things and questioning, and I do as well, often much more than any intuitive I know, even if my Si is dominant. And I have been asked by an intuitive how and I am into fantasy and published my own fantasy books since I am not an intuitive but a sensor and "fantasy is an intuitive's thing" ...guys...stereotypes don't define us all.
Everyone has their own value and for things to move forward you need both the vision and the practical person that can make it come true. And often, against the stereotypes, one can be both.
If you drew your avatar and your banner, that American studio was missing out because your art is great!
Fantasy being a intuitive notion doesn't match up with the notion of sensors being the largest population since they're the ones funding pop culture franchises, especially with the notion of ISTJs and ISFJs being the most common types and being so loyal to uphold the enduring fantastical/science fiction characters.
Curious if that notion has made a lot of ISFJs think they're INFP because of that stereotype.
Although, INFP J.R.R. Tolkien is the one fantasy author to Rule them all! At least what I read, which isn't much, and I haven't read LOTR or Chronicles of Narnia (Horse and His Boy was my favorite...but I don't remember a single thing about it) since I was a kid.
Best regards with your illustrator career!
@@JohnHenrysaysHi Thank you so much! I actually drew this when I was 14... I hope I have improved since then , but it means a lot to me that you like it even if it's so old 🌺
Your point is exactly what I had in mind! And Tolkien has also been the example that I think we most have in mind when it comes to that matter. (And I am a Huge fan of Tolkien, half of my fanart is about The Silmarilion XD)
Thank you so much for your kind words and I return the best wishes with whatever expresses you the best or the goals you may have. 🌺
@@CineShinya Hey, as "they" say: make new art but keep the old; one is silver, and the other is gold. And I'm sure your new stuff is gold if you continue that trajectory since you were 14. That American animation studio was missing out.
And by "they" I meant me. Psst...you know the all knowing, all seeing "they" narratives? That's me. It's how I get my kicks coming up with all different "you know they say..." narratives, especially coming up with ones that contradict each other to see what happens.
I bet you're now re-thinking the well wishes for my goals...although, you did say best meaning, it probably should be for something good, and if not, then you were the kind one suggesting I had noble goals like a stereotypical friendly ISFJ...I'm kidding!
Hopefully, I didn't loose with these jokes, but if you'd like to share your inspiration behind your avatar, feel free!
Very cool that your fan art is of The Silmarillion. I think Tolkien helped create such a rich template and his LOTR will endure for all time. Regardless of anyone's type, I think he's an amazing inspiration for making art to uplift people, and perhaps, Tolkien's Middle Earth isn't everyone's cup of tea from a surface level, but I think if people find the right variation that caters to their sensibilities, they can appreciate it. And being that Si is so particular, ISFJs be excellent barer of the torch.
Also, ISFJ Samwise Gamgee is the best. When I think of best fictional friends, I think of Sam, Cliff Booth (Once Upon a Time in Hollywood), Mary Bailey (It's a Wonderful Life), Lisa (Rear Window), Mel Miller (A Face in the Crowd), and...well, pretty much the entire Fellowship of the Ring are up there.
Perhaps, the reason behind that American studio's decision was because they were thinking of people wanting a similar appeal with Myers and Briggs where they're trying to give the basic of essence/simplistic representation for the widest appeal for people to project themselves into, but, and I'd enjoy hearing your thoughts, I think of Meyers and Briggs types like emoticons where it's basic cave men language that can be used to represent so many different emotions without context similar to how personality type is just the basic essence of personality type whereas people's full personality is informed how the choices they make with their intellect and will which is informed by people's beliefs, faith, intelligence (which factors into what you initially said about the underestimation of sensors- people are missing out!), maturity, experiences, upbringing, financial situation, job, culture, health, surrounding, education, etc.
Conceptually, ISFJs can be more interesting than INFJs since if they're just common types, then the people would have to work more on their personality to stand out, and if they're dominant function is introvert sensing, they're informed/energized with actual experience, and every single person is different, and being that introverted sensing is so particular to the individual, it provides a wealth of interest.
And now thanks to the internet, it's probably helped a lot of sensors develop intuition way quicker thanks to the wealth of options for someone with just the right personality at the right time to cater to each individuals particular interests to make them interested in developing intuition in a fun way.
And this is just my theory, but I think if type is based on the overall big picture, then it makes sense for types to be be most similar to the same type with one letter off, and possibly the reverse say for an ISFJ since, and please share your thoughts!
In order to get refined sensing with Si, it would require extroverted sensing, and I'm currently thinking being introverts, and depending on how much they spend time alone, ISFJs could develop more Fi than Fe, or be focused on their own Fi values to better Fe harmonize with people, which means that they're conceptually adept at Si and Fi which are very particular functions providing for a very unique individual as opposed to an INFJ attempting to simplify everything combined with Fe, that doesn't make for such uniqueness (unless they're more introverted developing that particular Fi which might be a case with Frank James which is a reason people think he's an INFP but I don't know!) which is why I think a lot of people of every type would relate to Frank James' INFJ skit segments since it's the broadest appealing type meaning, it's helpful for setting a standard for cool and attractiveness, but everyone is different so it's just a way to get the general population on the same page to highlight those, like yourself, who don't fit in with the generalities.
And getting back to ISFJs, if they're so introverted to develop Fi more (and this is just my theory!), they might think themselves similar to ESFPs along with INFJs, ESFJs, ISFPs, and ISTJs, but the distinction will be apparent when thinking of ISFJs conceptual weakness with thinking and intuition, and because they're weaker in those areas, the more "preferred" Ti and Ne with be help make the distinction where they'll appear so much different conceptually than ESFPs and ISFPs, and then somewhat ISTJs but being that I think the introverted thinking depth of Ti requires breaking apart Te for a refined consistent logic that works for the individual, ISFJs can relate to ISTJs. So the inferior Ne is going to be more apparent with lack of inclination toward Ni and therefore by not being so inclined toward that Ni reduction, ISFJs are going to be interesting....conceptually...everyone is their own unique individual.
Also, I think ESFPs might not focus on developing Si like ISFJs with Se because the introverting side of Si isn't required for Se where they can just go go go experiencing and not refining, so an ESFP most likely won't confuse himself or herself with being an ISFJ.
And with that, there might be something with ENFPs and ENTPs not being for refining Ni which is why....I'm thinking that might be why Frank James said the types he'd want to be the most alien with are ISFJs, ISTJs, ENFPs, and ENTPs...I didn't think this through, I'm thinking right now as I'm writing to you and I gotta go! haha Hope some of this made sense!
Feel free to let me know if you disagree or having any other thoughts!
I really appreciate your reply. And your classy pleasant emoticons...as opposed to what I consider to be the caveman over the top smiley faces ones. Emoticons like the flowers you used or Christmas trees help create pleasant tone in a more elegant manner in my opinion but if you use those other emoticons, I don't mind!
Hope your week is off to a nice start!
@@JohnHenrysaysHi My friend...I must admit I was astonished, this has the biggest reply I have ever seen on youtube! Which I will take it as that you really gave it some time and thought, so thank you for sharing all these thoughts with me.
Also, kudos for the separated paragraphs, they are easier to read.
I agree with most things you say, so I don't see a point to elaborate on them one by one. Overall, I find your train of thought quite interesting as also the references and examples you gave.
And about your humour, I have an ENTP brother. I can handle a lot~
About the American studios, I agree to what you said, but also the American culture seems to sacrifice quality for quantity in every aspect. More people to please, so more simplified products. The problem with that is that people are satisfied with products below average. You see that in music, you see that in food and films...They focus on the trends and not on making something actually good. Sometimes people are scared of what is good because they can't reach it, so it's not as relatable.
The comparison of the INFJs with ISFJs, was pretty much to the point as well, but when it comes to cognitive functions, the culture but also the daily life of each person or their interests might lead to the utilisation of each one of them. You mentioned internet, but also reading interesting books or watching good films can help you grow as a person. I know Ni dominants that can't grasp many philosophical concepts or feel irrelevant to them because their Ni is trapping them in their own point of view, something Ne users don't struggle with as we are open to different perspectives. I have also noticed INFJs make often generalizations and come up with quotes that seem wise at first, but missing all the exceptions and facts, they just created a beautiful lie. Something that doesn't apply in real life. And they refuse to see it.
Even FJ here, from his content overall in comparison to other MBTI channels, I don't know if it's an Ni or something else, but... he tends to stick a lot to his own perspective and the way he portrays the characters never breaks the stereotypes or gets deeper. I know the sketches are comedic, but they seem too....2D. Dear Kristin, on the other hand, gives them more depth and has them interact with each other making them more real. But maybe this is also because she is an Extrovert and FJ is an introvert. And this might play a part, as she appears to know well people from each type and mimic their behaviour, still in a comedic way but more dimensional.
I am also surprised and glad of your appreciation to my reply and use of emojis that are a little out of the ordinary with a more floral approach. I think smiley faces wouldn't define me as much as an offer. And offering a beautiful flower is as if you indeed give something to the other person more than a smile that might be fake. Even if we still talk about emojis. And artistically speaking, the flower emojis are more elegant than the yellow silly faces, aren't they?~
🌸🏵🌹🌺🌻🌼🌷
And you can be creative with the aesthetic as well
🍁🍂🍊🌾
Or express not just a fleeting emotion or reaction but your entire state of deeper feelings.
🥀
I didn't think I would come to analyze emojis, but here we are. Thank you for bringing it up. It lead to an interesting path. 💐
@@CineShinya I really appreciated what you said about the smiley emoticons coming across fake, and I agree. Of course, it depends on the person and sometimes it could provide a helpful balance for more aggressive people where they have to swing the other way over the top emotionally. Also, they're useful to help de-escalate things with them since because since they're so emotional they only respond to emotion, and that's not a feeler or thinker thing which is something that Frank and other people bring up. The Meyers and Briggs foundation says:
"Don't confuse Feeling with emotion. Everyone has emotions about the decisions they make. Also do not confuse Thinking with intelligence.
Everyone uses Thinking for some decisions and Feeling for others. In fact, a person can make a decision using his or her preference, then test the decision by using the other preference to see what might not have been taken into account."
Although, I understand how Fe reads the emotional expressions of others and how Fi values can be informed by ones' emotions, so I think I understand what they're saying.
Frank uses emoticons a lot but I understand being that this is channel is how he's making a living so he just has to appeal to what the people want but, if someone used those kind of emoticons with me when it was just me seeing the emoticon, and not the person thinking other people were reading our texts, I wouldn't appreciate it and think they're phony or trying to manipulate me. And I might use emoticons back at them or mirror them to try to help them feel better or I'm on pick up pants patrol in covering my butt from some weirdo.
It's like white knight men/feminists being so overly the top about women where I'm thinking, they're probably perverts or I'll see them on the news later on. Also, I think similarly about many into anime with the over the top emotions.
Although, the attraction to the over the emotions might be by people who have trouble reading people so they need the over the top emotions. That might have something to with INTPs and ISTPs being into anime. My inability to read people well is one interested I had in Meyers and Briggs so I'm not putting anyone down, and it's something I actually broke down over years ago when someone was asking when I was interest in Meyers and Briggs because I wasn't good at reading people...but I think I'm decent in away, which I'm sure you, and anyone is, if you're a "real person", it doesn't matter what type you are: real recognizes real. Everyone appreciates authenticity. Reasonably of course, there's a time and a place for everything, and everyone should have privacy and with so many weirdos, I don't recommend full out authenticity but more relative authenticity.
Not bashing anime, since Dragon Ball was my favorite franchise, and Son Goku was my favorite fictional character (at least up to the Freeza arc since he and the rest of the characters lost their intelligence and, while they are flawed, they had a nobility to them, and that nobility was lost as well...plus, the writing made no sense but that's another conversation). Also, I like Ponyo when I saw it.
And I saw that you had anime looking videos on your channel, and that's the kind of anime aesethetic I think is great. But regardless of my preferences, hopefully you understood what I meant with my Spidey sense going off with certain people into the overly emotional fake nice guy stuff where, again, it's like "I'll see you on the news" and stay away from kids, and all our daughters and sisters, weirdos!
Uh oh I gotta go!
Uh...Your explanation for emoticons was excellent. This is my favorite reply I ever got in this channel.
Also, great observation on what you said about Ni.
Although, with Frank James, the reason not to go deep is because he's appeal to potentially millions, and can't go deeper/more nuanced because then that would veer away from personality type and more into personality in my opinion.
The cartoony-ness helps and while I think Kristin has great skits (After her Easter one, I think she went down a really niche dorky path where she lost me, but then I saw her recent Philosopher ones and that was back own point because I didn't think her skits were very good (to be frank, I thought her last one with the INTP was awful).
I gotta go.
Thank you for your thoughts. Feel free to tag me any time to see me in the comments. I write a lot of out there stuff because I'm trying to be entertaining but also...fluff to keep certain people away. And also, I write things to make a point so I gotta go
Hope you have a great day! Thank you so much! Please keep using your creative, graceful, elegant emoticons.
I've been thinking about emoticons for years and was so happy to read your post!
Also, again rushing so sorry if this is all over the place!
Omg - I've spent years thinking I was an intuitive, especially because I was always like "of course I have an imagination", "I'm quite capable of abstract thought", "I'm very good at brainstorming ideas", and "I very much appreciate theory and philosophy". In fact, I'm a PhD Candidate in Sociology, so I'm also very good at picking up on patterns. However, your description of a sensor and what sensors look for sounds exactly, pretty much word-for-word, like the critiques I give to so many students when I read their papers. My feedback is quite literally: "where are your sources?", "this is a sweeping generalization", "this misses the nuance and complexity", "this is opinion, not fact", "this should be grounded in some kind of evidence", "this is vague"; "you need details and examples".... it drives me NUTS and I could never understand it.
And oddly enough, I always have felt like many of the questions in the cognitive functions/MBTI tests are either vague, or invalid because they are double-barrelled and poorly worded which made the tests so confusing to me. Your video is making me think that maybe I'm actually a sensor. Even when I'm teaching, I consistently ground theories in real-life, concrete examples so students can see how the topics/abstract concepts at hand are applicable, and what they 'look like' in the real world. I love theories and philosophies in my area (e.g., ethics, equity/equality, morality, social justice) because I do think they carry weight for real people.
Anyway, I really appreciate this video!
Your description of these two was very sensing! Especially when you said to "get to the point" in reference to summaries. I always need someone to tell me why I should care or else I won't listen. Not sure if that's intuitive, being a questioner tendency, or just neurodivergence though lol
Edit: finished the video and now I think this was more of just a general rant about intuition lol
It didn't feel like a rant to me. I mean, i do rant about those long intros, which I agree with even as an intuitive. But I do agree that is wasn,t very intuitive of him thinking that people that do that are intuitive because I am not like that. Like, those videos with long intros are not even talking much about the subject at hand so it's not even a resume.
I agree it was about intuition. I’m a sensor and it didn’t make any sense to me.
Wow!!!!!! I’m literally fighting with my boss about this… I’m an ENFJ and I’m all about overview at work. And my boss is all about details… wow… I have never thought about this ever even with my knowledge of Myers Brigs
Did this help any of you guys change your type? Or help type your favorite youtubers? If so, feel free to share! Maybe we share some favorites and it will be fun to see if we came up with the same type. Heck, what is your favorite youtuber of each of the 16 types? Thanks for doing this, teacher Frank! You're my favorite INFJ for my list.
Favorite ESFP and ESTP: Kara and Nate
@@nesi_nesi_nesi Woah. Thanks! I have to look them up. Feel free to share more. I have around 400 subscriptions so I'd have to think about it for awhile so take your time!
@@bluebellbell3725 Sweet! Is that the channel? I'll check them out later when I get back! Your username rocks. I tried saying it 5 times fast and made..hey, I did it. I was going to joke that I couldn't do it. I'm going to go for 20!
Feel free to keep tagging if you can think of ones for the other 14!
I guess your native language is Spanish, or you are learning it?
@@bluebellbell3725 pretty sure Kara is an ENFP and Nate is an ESTJ…? Not sure where you derived this typing from.
Thank you for this!
The details make no sense until I know and understand the overview. Once I have the overview, I know where to place the details that follow in my head so that everything makes sense.
As a sensor… I want to say, intuitives don’t just “guess”. They are excellent at looking at trends and making a hypothesis based on the trend.
If x=y
Then we know that y will eventually be this.
A lot of intuitives do great in the stock market. Whereas the sensors play by the book play safe.. not much risk takers.
There are far more sensors than intuitives in the population. The stock market wouldn’t survive with just intuitive investors. Since FJ didn’t explain details of what he meant by “guessing,” we don’t know which situations to apply it to.
@@andeeq666 I’m not saying sensors don’t invest. For goodness sakes, I invest. I’m just saying you will see intuitives take better risks. I have respect for intuitives.
Yes. This is how I argue with my sister and she said "Why we were arguing? The one you said, that's the point I was talking about!" When I knew very well she missed my points of how she should be specific about telling something so I won't misunderstood. She is an INFJ and I'm an ISTJ. I guess that N and S did made us arguing over the things that we shouldn't be argued, just because how she explains things differently that how I do.
This is like with me and my friend, too.
10:47 yes, the guessing part is SO true.
I’ve gotten in trouble sometimes for this , cause I was not paying attention, and just assume what the point of the other person is.
- from an intuitive😂
One thing I respect about sensors is how they can practically get things done. In creative professions us intuitives will spend so much energy looking at the various angles that we burn ourselves out, meanwhile the sensor has already finished 3 projects.
Interesting thing about the Patterns vs. Events point: one time, a peer and I were doing this activity to determine what we would guess the price of certain grocery items was. We came to an example of where we were shown a purple bag of mozzarella cheese. I guessed it was the more expensive option out of the two prices we were given because cheese is oftentimes the most expensive part of a meal, comparing itself to carbs or bread, for example. (There’s a reason why Olive Garden serves so many bread sticks before getting to the meals with cheese it in. Bread is much less expensive than dairy products). Also, because the bag was purple, and purple is so rare in nature, it one of the most expensive colors to use (Hence why purple is the color of royalty, because royals were at one point only able to afford purple dye). Whereas, the other peer figured out that the price was actually the less expensive option solely because of the pattern that the first option was always correct. I did not even notice the pattern at all.
In case you’re wondering, I’m an ISTJ, and the peer was an INTP.
I’m an ENFP, and I can do both outline and details (for a given value of details!) but I think where my Ne comes in is WHY. I prefer an overview because to get excited about the details I need to know why they’re exciting, and where they’re leading. I also didn’t think the S analogy was an analogy, it’s a simple comparison. I don’t think N analogies are confusing, at least to intuitors. I massively respect sensor’s ability to enjoy the detail and be in the present but I’m a sucker for a story and I need to see the bigger narrative to be fully invested in something. Thanks for reminding us when that can be a weakness, though, Frank! We do need to check the internal integrity of our stories!
This was really helpful. I was always kind of confused with intuition and sensing. Uhh, yeah.
- INFP
Well said, eh yes.
-enfp
I can clearly see you are an intuitive person due to the way you are explaining the differences. It was difficult to understand you since I am a sensor but I used my last brain cell to understand.
Some more fun differences:
Sensing people:
- Like to talk about life, and tell stories about WHAT they did, in great detail; and sometimes feel caught off guard by the cloudy topics Intuitors like to bring up.
- Prefer slap-stick and other tangible forms of comedy, INSTEAD of things that require them to piece together funny connections, analogies, and metaphors that "just make sense".
- (Extroverted) Like to spend more time outdoors engaging their physical senses through sports and recreation -- this is because it gives them a tangible story to talk about later, and it's the opposite of fiction/imagination.
- Great at stating facts that are hard to disagree with, and reminding people of important things they may not have thought of.
Intuiting people:
- Like to talk about ideas, systems, philosophies, and what-ifs; and sometimes they feel annoyed when a Sensor is cataloguing every single event they did in a day.
- Usually enjoy most forms of comedy, but especially anything that's clever, ironic, or anything that gives them the satisfaction of "figuring it out". You'll often see this when two Intuitives point at each other, wink, and say "Eeeeyyyy!" when they both get the joke. There is 100% a territory of "basic comedy" that turns Intuitors off because it required no thought or cleverness at all.
- Prefer to find their recreation in fantasy, fiction, and anything that validates their sense of being "out of this world" because their heads are already in the clouds, so fiction is a comfortable place to be in.
- Great at saying what everyone else was already thinking, and getting tons of Likes and validation for it from others.
These are not exclusive to each side, but are common.
INFP 👋
As an intuitive, I absolutely agree with this comedy business; I love dark humor, satire and metaphor/analogy/pun humor.
Something that means something else, but is so open to interpretation that it's too generalized to be attacked outright, leaving it to be thought provoking. 'chefs kiss'
This form of humor is the future.
@@dante7817same, that's probably why slapstick comedy isn't funny for me at all and when my parents are laughing I don't understand what's so funny..
That was the best, most relatable and understandable explanation I've ever heard and it really helps me.
Loved this video! Was an absolute comet ride through all the different sub-topics for this comparison. People often don't get that everyone uses everything, just some a bit more than others; so whenever they see an intuitive excessively worrying about every single detail one day out of a 100, they immediately think they were wrong and that they are probably sensors, and they just Scooby Doo'd their evil "intuitive" mask off.
11:49 no, because sensing types can't prepare for potential problems and can't adapt to possibilities if they don't take that logical leap.
The intuitive can warn the sensor that the plan the proposed is likely to have concequences. The sensor will disregard those (lack of proof) despite many patterns from similar decisions (the sensor will always find ways to argue why this unique situation is different, so that precident doesn't apply )
The intuitive will be preparing for the 'inevitable' concequenses of the bad decision, while the sensor has dismissed the warning, only to not have a plan when the intuitive eventually winds up being right.
I think the guessing aspect is the reason intuitives often make big leaps: they are super focused on the ideal outcome and don't see the steps they need to reach it and that life isn't always ideal. Sensing types see it better, and tend to have more a stable life as a result, but often times miss out on opportunities because they don't think chasing them is realistic. I think both of them can learn that high aspirations and pragmatism can go hand in hand
Como INFJ do eneatipo 1, eu aprendi desde cedo a ser mais metódica para atingir meus objetivos e gosto de que as coisas sáiam do meu jeito, por isso prefiro atividades individuais do que em grupo.
I think what you said makes a lot of sense . I've always wondered why the intuitives I know are a bit delusional when it comes to pursuing romantic relationships. I think they get so excited about finding their ideal person and relationship that they often don't gauge people's personality or interest level in them accurately.
As an ENFP when you talked about guessing it made me think of all the nights spent thinking about all the possible and impossible life forms on other planets,even when it makes no sense 😅
I'm definitely more on the N side, but tests usually show me as pretty close on the whole N vs S scale. I've had a lot of trouble with both types when it comes to actually DOING things though. when they get to their extremes S types can get so bogged down in details that they'll never actually start a project, or they'll make it way more complicated than it needs to be by constantly ironing out these details. then when something goes wrong it throws the entire project off because it affects the other details. then on the other side, when N types go to their extremes their plans become unreasonable, making grand plans but never going over key details, then getting overwhelmed when those big issues come up that they didn't see coming.
This explains why, as a botanist, I’m all about the plant families and not so worried about remembering species names.
Yeah I was waiting for this video !
(about sending and intuition)
@@yumedreamdream Sensing.* :)
@@SoloMonYamashita-Hermit sensing yeah ! ooops!
How interesting! I'm mostly INFJ but never realized how much I integrate Sensing into my Intuitive evaluation. I rely on 'getting the pig picture' really quickly and then zoom in on the facts to make the impression more concrete/justifiable. To be able to explain it. As more and more 'details' roll in, they refine my impression. The pattern breaks apart into sub-patterns until it gets all the variants. I have a Sensing-main friend with whom I almost exclusively adopt a fact-based discourse, and then I mix it up with others or adapt. In my circles, I'm among the top in perceptive and it makes sense. You get an advantage if something forces you to use both ways all of the time.
I think we’re around sensors so much it becomes a learned behaviour. The world is full of sensors so it’s kind of hard not to pick up those characteristics.
@@lisaoutinen8692true, I'm an INFJ but I've learned to rely on details too because of school and sensors around me.