Actors: Let's talk Script analysis!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @HajiAbdullah
    @HajiAbdullah Рік тому +2

    I've been waiting on Matt to talk about this forever
    Thank you

  • @carlchilders6069
    @carlchilders6069 Рік тому +1

    As always, great stuff. I cannot believe someone argued with YOU on the format of the script....

  • @DanielKnightActor
    @DanielKnightActor Рік тому +3

    Matt thanks so much for diving deeper into script analysis. I shudder to think and remember when I did not "do the work" when prepping for auditions back in the day. Just assumed I knew what the he** I was doing. Yikes! Over time and via taking some pretty good acting classes, I learned what script analysis is and how important it is. At least now, I can bring a level of professionalism when i prep. And of course there is a direct correlation to one's level of confidence and the amount of and knowledge of how to prep. Much obliged as usual for your unique and fun approach to sharing information with us. And of course, using Fletch as your example made me laugh, including snorting some OJ up my nose.

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому

      Hey Daniel! Glad you like the Fletch stuff. I watched it again recently, so it was on the brain :)

  • @nelsonbonilla5919
    @nelsonbonilla5919 Рік тому +1

    Another solid drop Matt. Thank you bub.

  • @deborahkuhn
    @deborahkuhn Рік тому +1

    Great stuff, Matt! Thank you.

  • @coryhawkes5349
    @coryhawkes5349 Рік тому +1

    Thanks again!!

  • @Speak_Life_2016
    @Speak_Life_2016 3 місяці тому +1

    I'm learning so much from your videos. 🏆

  • @OlgaKuznetsova
    @OlgaKuznetsova Рік тому +1

    This is such good info! Thank you for sharing!!

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому +1

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @MePeterNicholls
    @MePeterNicholls 7 місяців тому +1

    3:51 as an occasional script writer, I prefer removing any ambiguity. I’d write JOHN C.
    (Off-screen)
    Line line line.

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  7 місяців тому

      Thanks for the input!

    • @MePeterNicholls
      @MePeterNicholls 7 місяців тому +2

      @@GetTaped personally I just try to make life easier for everyone. I don’t put needless obstacles in people’s way. I get others don’t think the same tho.

  • @brianbeegle4835
    @brianbeegle4835 Рік тому

    Get Taped is wonderful and Matt knows his stuff!!

  • @tashiallgood
    @tashiallgood Рік тому +1

    Good stuff, thanks Matt!

  • @rayanroy8232
    @rayanroy8232 Рік тому +1

    THank you so much🤗

  • @jaysonwsmith
    @jaysonwsmith Рік тому

    Slashes usually dictate inter spliced dialogue. They indicate where two lines intersect. The authors has two lines of dialogue with slashes instead four half sentences. Basically. Neil Labute uses this convention a lot.

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому

      Interesting. I actually don't think I've ever seen a script using slashes, then. Thanks for the nugget of wisdom, Jayson!

  • @akatommyg
    @akatommyg Рік тому +1

    I got an audition today for 2 characters in the same scene. (Ex. Guard 1 & 2). Because it wasnt specified that I tape each one seperately, I can only assume theyd like me to do both in 1 read as 1 character. Also, in the sides, the 1 & 2 next to the characters was very obviously covered up. My problem with this is, reading these as 1 character makes the scene very confusion because the 2 characters are doing completely different things in the scene, and at times have alternating lines. Unless theyre looking for Schizophrenic Guard, Im unsure how to approach this one.

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому +1

      Ah, the old ___ 1&2. It’s very confusing when casting doesn’t make their preference clear. And in those cases, I’ll tend to just assume ownership over how I approach (combining lines, doing 1 take each, or ad libbing to make the combined version make more sense). To me, if casting doesn’t have the time or desire to clarify, they have no choice but to accept what we do with limited information.

    • @akatommyg
      @akatommyg Рік тому

      Thank you

  • @stephendavidcalhoun182
    @stephendavidcalhoun182 Рік тому +1

    There are definitely sides that are sent out that need extensive perusal. I catch typos and even mislabeled characters all the time. (Just last week, as a matter of fact.) 🦅👁️

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому

      It’s true that you have to be vigilant. But much easier to catch those errors when you understand scriptwriting and the correct formatting.

  • @sharonsquires3556
    @sharonsquires3556 Рік тому

    Thank you Matt!! So helpful!! Can you Recommend a book on this stuff??? 🙂

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  Рік тому +1

      I don't own any specifically on formatting. I've learned it here and there throughout the years reading thousands of scripts, and writing a bunch myself.
      That said, a lot of people seem to recommend The Screenwriter's Bible. Another book, Dr. Format Tells All, looks intriguing for those "special case" formatting questions like text messaging. Hope that helps!

    • @sharonsquires3556
      @sharonsquires3556 Рік тому

      @@GetTaped Yes, thank you!

    • @sharonsquires3556
      @sharonsquires3556 Рік тому

      @@GetTaped Yes! thank you! it may speed up a few things 🙂 Knowledge wise 🙂

  • @tiredofthebs9
    @tiredofthebs9 10 місяців тому +1

    I just discovered your channel, love the content. But the videos I watched so far seem more applicable to union, bigger budget projects. What about actors who are still getting experience with non-union low budget projects?

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  10 місяців тому

      Thanks for the question. Over the 3.5 years of the channel, we’ve posted some videos geared toward actors at the start of their careers, but you’re right that the bulk skew towards the issues that come up on a union project.
      Are there any specific topics you’d like to see discussed? I’d be happy to tailor a video if the issue is broad enough.

    • @tiredofthebs9
      @tiredofthebs9 10 місяців тому +1

      @@GetTaped Well, just a general video about navigating low budget non-union projects.
      Should an actor just take any speaking gig that they can get?
      I've been in 3 low budget productions. One production had terrible quality. I didn't get paid and the footage wouldn't be worth adding to a demo reel. The director/producer of the second project said the actors have to pay the editor $25 to get their footage. And third project, also unpaid, the filmmakers still didn't give me my footage. I had to screencap the portion I wanted from Tubi.
      My agent encourages me to apply to any projects I see on my own as well, but I don't see anything that's worthwhile. I'm not asking for much. If I don't get paid, then I should at least get decent footage and an IMDB credit...but majority of these projects don't even go on IMDB. What's the point?

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  10 місяців тому

      These are great questions. And while I’ve sort of covered some of it scattered across previous videos, I’ll work on condensing those thoughts to address it more specifically. Stay tuned!

    • @tiredofthebs9
      @tiredofthebs9 10 місяців тому

      @@GetTaped can't wait!

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  10 місяців тому

      In the meantime here's a video I did tailored to non-union productions: ua-cam.com/video/KVjzPExBVjo/v-deo.htmlsi=SiP3N66NEtd5w4jL

  • @Mostirrelevant
    @Mostirrelevant 8 місяців тому +1

    It is a shame they don't have the chance to read the whole script and get the feeling where their character is going and to get the feel of character development. I do understand, and it is probably unnecessary for available books and well-known plays, however, it would be great

    • @GetTaped
      @GetTaped  8 місяців тому

      Yeah in a perfect world we’d have lots of time and plenty of background information. Alas…

  • @jaysonwsmith
    @jaysonwsmith Рік тому

    Steph: I do yeah. That's why I just corrected you on it. / Bionic Woman. Lindsay Wagner.
    Greg: Great. / Thanks.
    Steph: Doesn’t matter, You’re just deflecting it again … Yes. She heard you guys, clear as day. / Or a bell, or whatever …
    Greg: Fine. / OK, and? And?