BMPT terminator 3 can be on the T14 chassis with a khinzhal module but instead of one 57mm gun there will be 2. I think it will be similar to T15 with a khinzhal module (2 Ataka missiles and 1 57mm gun, apfsds-120mm penetration on 60° armor from 1.5km)
Terminator in addition to 2x30mm auto cannon and 2x2 Ataka atmg's also has 1 7,62mm coaxial machinegun and 2x30mm grenade launchers on the side above the tracks.
This Russian idea of two Terminators for one MBT in urban environments has some proven merit. Looking at history, some of the German heavy tank (Tiger 1, Tiger II) commanders in the WW2 Berlin fighting improvised a Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind escort to deal with infantry. They even had a term for "washing off" the tank that was being swarmed by infantry. (In the "Saving Private Ryan" movie, the producers demonstrated this technique). I read about this in various memoirs of surviving German tank commanders. Don't rely on internet forums - mostly bs. Go to source materials.
это были не танкисты, а фрицы. Скоро их ждет тоже самое что и в 1945, правильно вы подметили, последняя битва будет в берлине, не запомнили немцы урок - придется напоминать, привет из России и с наилучшими пожеланиями!
@@Alex_Brave777 Apparently, FSB (the KGB replacement) agents are desperate to get out, they're on the inside; and know full-well that Russia can't win. And they know that criminal prosecutions are coming. Putin wants to drag this out-as it suits him, but the war needs to be prosecuted quickly. Ukraine have been saying for months they need 300-400 modern Western third-generation MBTs to finish the war by driving the invaders out. They're getting about 320. No Challenger 2 has ever been destroyed in combat-it's considered the best protected and safest MBT, M-1 Abrams destroyed over 500 Iraqi T-72s for no loss (only the M-2 Bradleys, working in hunter-killer teams with the M-1s destroyed more, for a few losses as they're IFVs with lighter armour-but they're a whole generation better than what Russia has, and bring a laser rangefinder to the battlefield for example-which is a capability the Ukranians didn't have before). And even American tankers say Leopard 2 is a better tank than the Abrams, which is very thirsty-a jet engine was chosen in part for logistics reasons: the M-1s are intended to share the fuel supply for the helicopters, as it's just easier with their doctrine of using gunships with MBTs as the ultimate tank hunting team. The MBTs use a lot of fuel, so it needs to be forward deployed, and with the Apaches, the fuel's already there. Or somesuch. Cold War doctrine, for fighting a near-pear enemy in Europe. But it's also a maintenance whore, the Americans weren't lying when they talked about the importance and difficulty of the logistics train. They take a lot to keep running, including a lot of specialists. Leopard has a diesel engine, and Leopard 2 is known for its very well armoured hull especially, as well as having the best mobility of any MBT, just as the Leopard 1 before it had. So it has horses for Spain. In short: you're a brainwashed fool. NOTHING you believe, is real.
The terminator is still an easy target if its not properly supported by infantry, also the first one has already been taken out in ukraine, what is the total number of terminators made... 20`?
Increased armour with passive and active systems Upgraded thermal sites Gun with higher elevation The role of this is to provide protection against infantry especially in urban area.
@@andrewgreen1940 The Ukrainians weren't impressed. The biggest weakness seems to be its sensors. They don't give complete awareness. This is a death sentence in urban combat. It seems that the best defense for a tank in MOUT (military operations in urban terrain) is the good old MK I grunt.
@@mosnicolae1678 It is very much a tank, its just not a MBT, or Main battle tank. its job is to fend off CAAT(combined anti armor team), and other fast movers that are threats to MBTs
I seen footage of this battlefield monster in the woods of ukraine near kreminna, just this past week, WOW this thing is a terror on the battlefield, there is nowhere to hide from it. When 3 of four of these things close in for up close support, the whole seen becomes a sureal killing field, wow these battle wagons really unload the firepower, they are the most impressive battlewagon I have ever seen used on any enemy.
@@ЯрославКарнаух-о6ж every machine can be defeated, there are none that are impregnable to defeat, I do know that the terminator is a force multiplyer in a battalion. SAVAGE DESTRUCTION.
@@ЯрославКарнаух-о6ж У хохлов больше 3000 танков и бмп уничтожили,а оно перемогает 1 терминатор-теперь вот натовские танки просрет и все о победе мечтает.
@@yeticonfettis They don't know, nobody knows how many there are, but there must be more, in addition the arms factories have begun to increase their production due to various factors... Nothing has been known about the destruction they comment on, and surely the ucros would use it as news international, knowing that these machines are considered the best of the Russian army...
same efficiency as the never seen T14 tank: two terminators was severely damaged from Ukrainians and after this, all 10 terminators was retired from the front...
@@AlexKarasev we’ll get these territories without saying this word. The Luhansk region and the Crimea has already become our places . And if you know a piece of history dude these territories have been Russian and they have been given to Ukraine as a surprise. Nowadays we can say by a mistake.
I seen the terminators enter a forest recently and level it in ukraine. Was the craziest shit I've ever seen, nothing lived after that. Those thermals see everything. From what I've seen they hunt with them while the tanks wait until there finished.
thye have a lot of other sensors, satellite connectiona dn connection to a drone...and severla computers, tnak can go back home witout crew..in automode they can make a war alone..humans are not needed to control the fire oterwise it will blast everything that moves...it even work as anti aircraft wepaon..
All standard equipment on US armor since the 90s. GPS location and navigation through deep desert, thermal vision, and night vision were instrumental in both Gulf wars.
As a former Bradley gunner I have soooo many questions. Guns x2. Also means 2 feeds and storage. External guns, means unassing the turret and removing armor to clear a malfunction. Loaded unarmored launch tubes. With no reloads. It appears to me that it would be less than durable on the battlefield as far as the turret systems go. Additional gun rounds? Seems to be lacking. Must be fun boresighting two barrels at once, or are they just less accurate? And crazy as you might think, how durable is the turret vs say, a large tree branch or other vertical limitation that the hull easily clears under. Things happen fast in combat
Keep in mind these fire *simulatneously*. They also have two very agressive muzzle brakes and are completely exposed. The barrels on these things shake violently and have horrendous accuracy and dispersion from being blasted about by the muzzle brake concussion. Ever stood next to someone firing a rifle with a brake like this? It's very unpleasant. Imagine that in 30mm
Fun fact about gun (include thumbnail) ; The 30mm gun a shake every time when fire due muzzle brake's pressure are simply push each other and increase gun dispersion And thumbnail include curse 3 gun are possible but I guess bullet just end up everywhere and out of ammo faster
As far as i know there are two guns because of the fact that they were Not able to implement a two Belt feed System te change the ammotype quikly from i dont know HE to AP So there are two guns with two different belts
@@dozan174 я тебе открою военный секрет! Но в этих орудиях одинаковые ленты) Просто в ленте идут разные вариации осколочно-фугасных снарядов и бронибойных в порядке ленты) И поверь будь ты на 500, что на 2500 метрах от нее, ты бы понял что не хотел бы там находится, и все предыдущие выборы судьбы, привели тебя к фатальной ошибке!
@PEter Harrald Having a drone is well and good, and knowing that a BMPT is nearby is too (though fuck being infantry with enemy heavy armor armed to the gills nearby). But the question is whether one has sufficient means available to take it out. And Ukrainians don't have sufficient means nearby.
@@TamagoHead Do you know what a trainspotter is? Or what the hobby of trainspotting was? Geeks, sitting on platforms writing down the numbers of the trains pulling into the station in a collect them all sort of fashion? Very quaint pastime of a bygone era. My earliest memory was my father taking me to collect my brother from school and waiting to turn out onto the main road and a helicopter landing in the field next to us and watching all the soldiers jumping out, the first laying down to give cover and then the rest running to the perimeter of the field. That was pretty awesome to watch as a 4 yo. I’m no expert but I’ve always kept a long eye on all military tech since. You haven’t seen the remote control robot dogs that fire machine guns attached to their backs have you? If you had you wouldn’t be laughing. The world is turning into some sort of dystopian nightmare. Think how they’re going to attempt to improve on drones after this conflict. Who f**k are you calling me a geek? I’m not the one building a remote control robot dogs with a machine guns on their backs! Coming to protect kindergartens and communities near you soon, no doubt, as soon as the robot dog controlling people get the rest of the world in line. See you in the concentration camps, sucker.
7:20 "the deployment of the terminator is a sign of frustration from the Kremlin." So, desperately begging the west for new tanks and other military equipment must be a sign of confidende then, i guess.
@@daemianbox Then how did the video "not age well"? We have videos of it being destroyed and other than that we have seen it shoot at empty forests. Made no impact on the conflict.
@@Aisatsana1971 The ''special operation'' is to DEMILITARISE and DENAZIFY Ukraine, that is why the Ukrainian's are dropping like flies, and good riddance to them.
Don't you find it funny that ever since the russians started to use their SAMs to protect their slowly advancing forces that almost all drones including the Bayraktar has become pretty much useless? I guess you didn't notice the lack of new 'drone kino' supposedly wrecking russian armor. No new footage for months. That shows that the Bayraktar's time to shine has passed...
Russia churning out tons of new groundbreaking kit like tsunami Poseidon torpedos , one to look out for is Russian EMP , aka the microwaver or putins speech “ I got high energy weapons “ . Some idiots can’t even get it’s not Soviet Union anymore, this is modern Russia
I am curious about some things. Why the canon barrels are shaking so much during and after firing? Why is this vehicle so full of rust? Is 30mm enought? Why not 57mm?
Sounds great in theory, however in the cold light of dawn it's just another tank target to overflying UAVs. It's just another armoured target to the myriad of guided NATO anti tank missiles or mobile battery of M109 155mm SP guns. Plus devoid of dismountable infantry section to ferret out the MILAN teams. This strange doctrine of less infantry points towards a fear of treading Ukranian soil.
It was developed for Grozny. The lack of TRAINED infantry was the issue Russia was trying to address with this. It didn't pan out in Ukraine. There is no real substitute for SKILL in combined arms operations.
From what I’ve been hearing lately..the terminator has been very successful in Ukraine especially when deployed with T-90Ms.Will have to wait and see though
We can feel a little prejudice against the russian army in this video. Tanks are not as decisive as they use to be on the battlefield. They are threatened by dromes, airplanes, mines and the infantry have more ways than ever to destroy them. But armies still need them. Tanks have been proven not so effective in urbain warfare. The russian have experience the limits of the tanks in this kind of environement in different battleflied notably Syria where russians tanks have shown to be very vulerble agianst infantry operating in an urban environement. The ''terminator'' is an answer to this vulnerability with high velocity fire power and large angle of attack. The fact of replcing the canon by using rockets make also very much sense.
Easy, rather than putting one Daka Daka. The Russians thought it'd be ingenius to put TWO Daka Dakas and have it capable of pointing straight up so no highrise building can save you when its around and THEN automate the turret so it doesn't need a person on the top to operate it, so even after destroying the turret. It might still be able to function with its components still intact. As if that wasn't enough, they also thought it'd be ingenius to slap not two but FOUR Vikhrs ATGMs on its side to shoot down far away low flying choppers or any MBTs that it'd see within its thermals. I swear, the Russians. Like the United States Military Industrial Complex just thinks up whatever man made horrors beyond human comprehension and makes it a reality and puts a price tag on it.
it would not be necessary for that because one, you can store much more ammo of 30mm than of 57mm or 75mm, secondly you don't need any extra pen on the 30mm because you have 4 ATGMs on this thing for destroying enemy armor and defensive positions (should you need to), you also have 2 30mm grenade launchers too that are able to fire over cover and destroy enemies hiding behind said cover, not to mention that a 57mm or 75mm would have far less of a rate of fire than 2 30mm and would be far less effective at suppressive fire which is extremely important in combat, and last but not least 2 30mm cannons are more than enough to destroy enemy APCs, IFVs, and motor vehicles, not to mention that 30mm shells are far cheaper to produce and produce in large quantities compared to 57mm and 75mm, and considering just about every other Russian APC and IFV uses 30mm shells it would also be much simpler for logistical reasons. also it's better to have 2 cannons than one because should one jam you have another cannon you can still use.
So why the ukranians got bitten ,lossing every day ground and doing defensive retririting war then???You watch too much one-sided brainwashing mass media mate!
@@Max_Da_G He's referring to the thumbnail, where the uploader has unnecessarily photoshopped a third 30mm barrel onto the turret, which seems silly to me too
It can be as lethal as you like on paper. But its crew will be conscripts, the vehicle will likely have little to no maintenance schedule thus thrown tracks knackered transmission and jammed main armament and will have very few precision missiles to fire. Just look at Ukraine, AKA Russian IFV graveyard
These are not conscripts using these units. Russia is using "contract" forces as they call them which is Professional Voluntary Soldiers. The unit they embedded them into in Dec 21 is a professional unit.
@@Knight_Kin of course they need contractors. Their army is a joke, and they can't mobilize because the government is lying to their people about it not being a war, but a "special operation".
Ukraine declared the fourth total mobilization already. Russia has used only 30% of the military group concentrated before the war on the Ukrainian border, and did 2-3 full rotations of acting troops already... Ukraine is a graveyard for Ukrainians themselves and for thousands of foreign mercenaries from all the world!
@@maksimluzin1121 they'll keep coming, too. Russia has taken more casualties in 6 months than they did in their entire invasion of Afghanistan, which is really pathetic given their army's size compared to Ukraine.
Wait, wait, wait, you skipped some very important facts on to why this terminator is still around. By 2015 this project was shelved because the Russian government couldnt put an order because of financial difficulties due to western sanction, as this new tank required the installation of a new production line, new equipment and training of new workers. Algeria asked for the 2 prototypes to be sent to them and after 10 months of testing they put and order of 300 units in april 2016 and PAID CASH IN ADVANCE to have the production line setup, basically saving the project. In 2017 Russia put their order that should start receiving their 1st batch the very next year 2018 after the production line was setup and then started the Algerian order mid 2018 till end 2021. The rest of the Russian order was started after the Algerian order. And that's why Algeria has 300 (some say over 300) and Russia recently (2022) started getting their units
This thing can single handed destroy any tank that USA and Germany deployed to Ukraine now. I hope soon we will see some footages how this thing devastate Abrams and Leopard 2.
Can it turn invisable and disapear if it's arse is getting kicked ? I seem to remember that from the movies ? A move all of Russia might like to emulate soon ...... ??
A lot of gay ass fanboying in here. Any proof, or is it the western propaganda bumping your gums from their hand up your ass, lol!? Russia holds all but the entire Southeast of UKRAINE and does so at a numbers disadvantage of 3 to 1 for Ukraine. Russia is whooping that ass, but keep talking that Zelensky talk where he argues that Ukraine is retreating forward, and Russia is advancing bacwards, LMAO!
It doesn't look like it's designed to face down a main battle tank. Only main battle tanks are built for that role, with anti tank vehicle and man portable missiles filling in the rest.
@@Knight_Kin Он и не предназначен для борьбы с танками. Я только сказал что он может разобрать любой танк, при себе стоимости дешевле западного танка в несколько раз дешевле
Another fancy toy from Russia who can't show how good it is since they don't have enough of them, and out of the few they do, crews are poorly trained and commanders are to incompetent to use them.
Desesperation? Is deseperation try to protect ur tanks from the enemy in urban warfare? In the first days of war russia lose a lot of heavy vehicles. Ad the terminator was more a solution
@@Mal101M did you see the Ukrainian parade of Russian Vehicles destroyed in Kiev? Do you see Russian troops marching in Kiev? I think we both know who's talking truth here and it's not Russia and it's definitely not you
@@Narukosaki Did you see how ukraine has lost 25% of their country now and none of their supposed counterattacks have achieved anything? Of course they can inflict losses on the russians, but considering that their losses are around 70k KIA....I wouldn't hold my breath for Ukraine's victory if I were you.
If getting destroyed by the impact of a Javelin = bad tank, then there is no such thing as a good tank, since the Javelin and other top attack AT weapons are practically lethal to any tank, and in case of the Javelin, even active protection systems, such as the throphy(israeli APS that is being adopted by the US military on newer Abrams tanks) can't stop a Javelin when its on top attack mode.
@@LoboalphaMASTER it's not only the machine it's the tactics that is used you might have the greatest tank of all time but if you have bad tactics you're going to lose
I mean, Ukrainians shot down atleast 3 KA-52s with Stugna-P (an ATGM without proximity fuse), so i don't know why ruSSians can't do the same with Atakas. Skill issue maybe? 😏 Or the fact that Vichrs are way too expensive for tanks to use 😏
Looks like a cool vehicle, but also like propaganda type material. As far as I know there are no Armata tanks or terminators in Ukraine. Plus seems there are no mass production of Armata series.
The BMP-T was actually deployed to Ukraine. I saw a video of it getting attack by artillery round (with another 2 tanks next to it). Not sure what happened to it cause all vehicles reversed and video ended. Cool to look at but it is junk. No news of it after months
Ah yes, a weapons system to fight the last war (Afghanistan) where there was a need for a vehicle whose main armament could elevate and depress to a far greater degree than what the Russian army had at the time - and which had weapons that could engage the enemy at ranges beyond what the enemy could engage. Seems to be a glorified infantry support vehicle/AAA weapons system. Infantry is moving along, sees a likely ambush point, have this thing toss a few 30mm rounds into the suspect spot and then move on. I think the missile launchers, once they are empty, cannot be reloaded by the crew as it carries no spares. Also, against a force that has modern long range ATGWs, it might have a serious problem. And in the narrower confines of an urban environment, it is very vulnerable to top down attacks - like a babushka dropping a couple of grenades on top of it, or a basic RPG.
@@rocketchicken5421 do you not remember the previous Russia/Ukraine conflict? Last I saw, every last russian commander was hunted down or assassinated even in their own headquarters. Those slavs are notorious for planting explosives targeting their adversaries. This is the second time around. You think third time will be the charm?🤷🏻♂️🌻
Most of all are in the sky now... 155 mm shells loves them , Javelin and N LOW loves them too, and what about antitank mines - nobody can even see were goes the turret after....
That’s a nice copium subscription you’re on. You must be giving your dealer your last penny. Terminators don’t have turrets, also only one has been destroyed so far after a year of fighting. Meanwhile Ukraine has close to 0 tanks left, their tank reserves have been so completely drained that they have to resort to begging the west to send them tanks.
There's only been around 20 made of each, and with a ban on optics and other military hardware it's doubtful Russia can make more. Those that are going to get made won't have anti-missile defenses, so they're just as vulnerable to Javelins and TOW missiles.
i don't understand why russian engineers like the twin cannons so much ( the ZU have 4 ) whenit is widely known that this solution lacks stability and precision to the guns .
@PEter Harrald Sorry your wrong they are fixed in place to each other. AP ammo in one gun HE ammo in the other. They could not get a dual ammo feed to work so they mounted two guns with different ammo. And the grenade launcher is a smoke launcher with frag grenades loaded in them.😎 Just so you know.
@@richlopez5896 And one more thing. Just because these can be taken out by a Javelin doesn't mean they're irrelevant or nothing special. By that logic, no tank on this planet is anything special and relevant
@@starship9629 They are irrelevent because Russia CAN'T put them into combat in Ukraine because they have very few and it is a big loss and propaganda to get it shown destroyed on social media like their T-90M was.They ARE irrelevent because they are just for parades like their T-14 tank is
Cierto. Pero no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver. Muchas películas de Hollywood. Se agrandan como pan en charco pero lo único que han peleado en los últimos 40 años fueron paises quebrados política y económicamente o pastores de ovejas en chanclas.
Rheinmetall Lynx KF41 Infantry Fighting Vehicle ► ua-cam.com/video/h_7P9U21ZGA/v-deo.html
nato is losing militarily, economically, and politically.
BMPT terminator 3 can be on the T14 chassis with a khinzhal module but instead of one 57mm gun there will be 2. I think it will be similar to T15 with a khinzhal module (2 Ataka missiles and 1 57mm gun, apfsds-120mm penetration on 60° armor from 1.5km)
terminator came in, to hold back nato hardware. Simple
Terminator in addition to 2x30mm auto cannon and 2x2 Ataka atmg's also has 1 7,62mm coaxial machinegun and 2x30mm grenade launchers on the side above the tracks.
@@darkmode8482😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Бесконечно можно смотреть на три вещи: как течет вода, как горит огонь, и как иностранцы пытаются произнести русские слова 0:24
😂
This Russian idea of two Terminators for one MBT in urban environments has some proven merit. Looking at history, some of the German heavy tank (Tiger 1, Tiger II) commanders in the WW2 Berlin fighting improvised a Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind escort to deal with infantry. They even had a term for "washing off" the tank that was being swarmed by infantry. (In the "Saving Private Ryan" movie, the producers demonstrated this technique). I read about this in various memoirs of surviving German tank commanders. Don't rely on internet forums - mostly bs. Go to source materials.
это были не танкисты, а фрицы. Скоро их ждет тоже самое что и в 1945, правильно вы подметили, последняя битва будет в берлине, не запомнили немцы урок - придется напоминать, привет из России и с наилучшими пожеланиями!
@@Alex_Brave777 I think you are right. Greetings to you as well!
@@Alex_Brave777 Apparently, FSB (the KGB replacement) agents are desperate to get out, they're on the inside; and know full-well that Russia can't win. And they know that criminal prosecutions are coming. Putin wants to drag this out-as it suits him, but the war needs to be prosecuted quickly. Ukraine have been saying for months they need 300-400 modern Western third-generation MBTs to finish the war by driving the invaders out. They're getting about 320.
No Challenger 2 has ever been destroyed in combat-it's considered the best protected and safest MBT, M-1 Abrams destroyed over 500 Iraqi T-72s for no loss (only the M-2 Bradleys, working in hunter-killer teams with the M-1s destroyed more, for a few losses as they're IFVs with lighter armour-but they're a whole generation better than what Russia has, and bring a laser rangefinder to the battlefield for example-which is a capability the Ukranians didn't have before).
And even American tankers say Leopard 2 is a better tank than the Abrams, which is very thirsty-a jet engine was chosen in part for logistics reasons: the M-1s are intended to share the fuel supply for the helicopters, as it's just easier with their doctrine of using gunships with MBTs as the ultimate tank hunting team. The MBTs use a lot of fuel, so it needs to be forward deployed, and with the Apaches, the fuel's already there. Or somesuch. Cold War doctrine, for fighting a near-pear enemy in Europe. But it's also a maintenance whore, the Americans weren't lying when they talked about the importance and difficulty of the logistics train. They take a lot to keep running, including a lot of specialists. Leopard has a diesel engine, and Leopard 2 is known for its very well armoured hull especially, as well as having the best mobility of any MBT, just as the Leopard 1 before it had. So it has horses for Spain.
In short: you're a brainwashed fool. NOTHING you believe, is real.
The terminator is still an easy target if its not properly supported by infantry, also the first one has already been taken out in ukraine, what is the total number of terminators made... 20`?
@@legatilegions8055 у нас заводы сейчас 24\7 работают, сделаем много
Increased armour with passive and active systems
Upgraded thermal sites
Gun with higher elevation
The role of this is to provide protection against infantry especially in urban area.
And its missiles at the sides of the turrent gets shot by an rpg, now it's useless
The role of this comedy tank is to appear on parades and be salivated over by trolls.
Unfortunately for the crew that will make it the first Target
@@andrewgreen1940 The Ukrainians weren't impressed. The biggest weakness seems to be its sensors. They don't give complete awareness. This is a death sentence in urban combat. It seems that the best defense for a tank in MOUT (military operations in urban terrain) is the good old MK I grunt.
Depth of the Russian arsenal….Translation: lack of faith in Russian infantry support of their armored columns
You neglected to mention the 2 AGD-17 grenade launchers, they are not mounted on the turret but implanted just below it near the sides...
BMPT is a cool tank
it is NOT a tank!
Cool looking but junk.. when was the last news about them after the "deployment"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kdawg9477 there was a lot of news from Ukraine that the Russians are using them there, and there are a lot of videos
@@mosnicolae1678 It is very much a tank, its just not a MBT, or Main battle tank. its job is to fend off CAAT(combined anti armor team), and other fast movers that are threats to MBTs
@@kdawg9477 update: plenty of videos of terminators in Ukraine. They are whooping ass. Go to, war of regrets. 🍻
I seen footage of this battlefield monster in the woods of ukraine near kreminna, just this past week, WOW this thing is a terror on the battlefield, there is nowhere to hide from it. When 3 of four of these things close in for up close support, the whole seen becomes a sureal killing field, wow these battle wagons really unload the firepower, they are the most impressive battlewagon I have ever seen used on any enemy.
First Terminator already been destroyed, yesterday. Likely near Kreminna, yeah.
@@ЯрославКарнаух-о6ж every machine can be defeated, there are none that are impregnable to defeat, I do know that the terminator is a force multiplyer in a battalion. SAVAGE DESTRUCTION.
@@michaelmontgomery5326 they only have like 11 working models left lol
@@ЯрославКарнаух-о6ж У хохлов больше 3000 танков и бмп уничтожили,а оно перемогает 1 терминатор-теперь вот натовские танки просрет и все о победе мечтает.
@@yeticonfettis They don't know, nobody knows how many there are, but there must be more, in addition the arms factories have begun to increase their production due to various factors... Nothing has been known about the destruction they comment on, and surely the ucros would use it as news international, knowing that these machines are considered the best of the Russian army...
Looks great and very modern. Perfect for a military parade.
same efficiency as the never seen T14 tank: two terminators was severely damaged from Ukrainians and after this, all 10 terminators was retired from the front...
Severely damaged your brain!
@@leneanderthalien Yeah suture like when Russia run out of missiles or the martyrs of snake island
@@leneanderthalien source?
@@leneanderthalien ссылку на повреждённые машины можно???
Capabilities are very impressive.
Too bad they are not reliable and too expensive they choose to modernise their old soviet tanks because its more cost effective 😂😂
@@thomasgaucher-peressini тебе видней, давай в добровольцы, там увидишь :))
@@Georgson copium much
"I need your Tracks, your Reactive Armor and your Hellfire missile Now~!" said Terminator with Austrian accent 😁
Lol 😂 idt
Any Tank against ATGM weather American, German or Korean or Indian or Chinese will face same fate what Russian Tank R facing
- I need your Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk
- You forgot to say "please!"
- I forgot to say Kherson
Terminator needs kyiv
@@VivekSingh-fb8vp They'll cope better than you get jokes.
@@AlexKarasev we’ll get these territories without saying this word. The Luhansk region and the Crimea has already become our places . And if you know a piece of history dude these territories have been Russian and they have been given to Ukraine as a surprise. Nowadays we can say by a mistake.
The feature of uncontrolled recoil due to both barrels shooting at the same time
I seen the terminators enter a forest recently and level it in ukraine. Was the craziest shit I've ever seen, nothing lived after that. Those thermals see everything. From what I've seen they hunt with them while the tanks wait until there finished.
thye have a lot of other sensors, satellite connectiona dn connection to a drone...and severla computers, tnak can go back home witout crew..in automode they can make a war alone..humans are not needed to control the fire oterwise it will blast everything that moves...it even work as anti aircraft wepaon..
All standard equipment on US armor since the 90s. GPS location and navigation through deep desert, thermal vision, and night vision were instrumental in both Gulf wars.
Meanwhile Ukraine killed 1/2 terminators in Russia. Russia has like 5 of these vehicles ? 🤣🤣🤣
The US has thousands of IFV's that are better than this terminator which has its guns shaking itself apart
@@takeshikovacs4728 🤡
As a former Bradley gunner I have soooo many questions. Guns x2. Also means 2 feeds and storage. External guns, means unassing the turret and removing armor to clear a malfunction. Loaded unarmored launch tubes. With no reloads. It appears to me that it would be less than durable on the battlefield as far as the turret systems go. Additional gun rounds? Seems to be lacking. Must be fun boresighting two barrels at once, or are they just less accurate? And crazy as you might think, how durable is the turret vs say, a large tree branch or other vertical limitation that the hull easily clears under. Things happen fast in combat
Один ствол заряжен осколочно фугасными снарядами , а второй бронебойными . Поэтому в бою он будет стрелять из кажлого ствола отдельно
Keep in mind these fire *simulatneously*. They also have two very agressive muzzle brakes and are completely exposed. The barrels on these things shake violently and have horrendous accuracy and dispersion from being blasted about by the muzzle brake concussion. Ever stood next to someone firing a rifle with a brake like this? It's very unpleasant. Imagine that in 30mm
If you want an enemy infantry man ,do you shoot at the T90 or do you shoot at the Terminator which is specifically designed to fight Infantry?
Terminator imo (unless you are out on open ground), if it doesn't take you out first!
Well if I have a Javellin and TOW I kill both.
@@DOI_ARTS If you don't get killed first.
I wouldn't kill any of them
because I don't live in Ukraine.
@@DOI_ARTS if you will have a chance...
Fun fact about gun (include thumbnail)
; The 30mm gun a shake every time when fire due muzzle brake's pressure are simply push each other and increase gun dispersion
And thumbnail include curse 3 gun are possible but I guess bullet just end up everywhere and out of ammo faster
As far as i know there are two guns because of the fact that they were Not able to implement a two Belt feed System te change the ammotype quikly from i dont know HE to AP
So there are two guns with two different belts
@@dozan174 Oh I forgor that, yeah that right
HE and AP are correct (It has specified detail I also forgor)
@@dozan174 я тебе открою военный секрет! Но в этих орудиях одинаковые ленты) Просто в ленте идут разные вариации осколочно-фугасных снарядов и бронибойных в порядке ленты) И поверь будь ты на 500, что на 2500 метрах от нее, ты бы понял что не хотел бы там находится, и все предыдущие выборы судьбы, привели тебя к фатальной ошибке!
Well, videos of this murderous beast already exist and it decimated it's targets included tank and infantry. It literally cleared forest..
It cleared the trees without hurting any tanks or infantry.
But it went boom
Why shooting if i can mined all the fields and everything pass would kaboom?
Yeah it came in fired and few hours later got an Excalibur in the face. Please understand Russian tech is not even close to Western tech.
@@iljavija Russian tech is better in some things and other way around. West is not superior in everything, please that🤣😆
2 to 1 in cities (terminators to tanks)! Makes sense.
It might be very terrifying to encounter one of these on the battlefield but is it a proven winner at this time ?
?v=RXNLXgdjLUQ Terminator in actions
It moves and shoots.
Saw a video on telegram channel, they were using tank and BMPT to attack advancing Ukraine army, well it wasn’t a good day to Ukrainians
@PEter Harrald +++
@PEter Harrald Having a drone is well and good, and knowing that a BMPT is nearby is too (though fuck being infantry with enemy heavy armor armed to the gills nearby). But the question is whether one has sufficient means available to take it out. And Ukrainians don't have sufficient means nearby.
Very nice content but i thought that the bmpt was made from the t72 and not from the t14
BMPT1 and 2 were, that’s the BMPT3. Like the T14, I’m not sure if it ever went into full production
@@jimohara yeah but i thought that it was named t15 armata the ifv variant
@@jimohara Geeks. I learn a lot from the comments. 👍😁😘🧐🤓
@@TamagoHead Do you know what a trainspotter is? Or what the hobby of trainspotting was? Geeks, sitting on platforms writing down the numbers of the trains pulling into the station in a collect them all sort of fashion?
Very quaint pastime of a bygone era.
My earliest memory was my father taking me to collect my brother from school and waiting to turn out onto the main road and a helicopter landing in the field next to us and watching all the soldiers jumping out, the first laying down to give cover and then the rest running to the perimeter of the field. That was pretty awesome to watch as a 4 yo. I’m no expert but I’ve always kept a long eye on all military tech since.
You haven’t seen the remote control robot dogs that fire machine guns attached to their backs have you? If you had you wouldn’t be laughing. The world is turning into some sort of dystopian nightmare. Think how they’re going to attempt to improve on drones after this conflict.
Who f**k are you calling me a geek? I’m not the one building a remote control robot dogs with a machine guns on their backs!
Coming to protect kindergartens and communities near you soon, no doubt, as soon as the robot dog controlling people get the rest of the world in line.
See you in the concentration camps, sucker.
@@jimohara Apologies, it was meant as a compliment. ☹️
7:20 "the deployment of the terminator is a sign of frustration from the Kremlin."
So, desperately begging the west for new tanks and other military equipment must be a sign of confidende then, i guess.
Exactly. The west are pushing and pushing. FAAFO
haha, it is russia against nato, everyone helped ukraine, so why not use latest weapon, and if usa decided to join directly let there be WW 3.
This video didn't age well. This are formidable machines!
well it didnt age well as one was destroyed.
@@correctionguy7632
Did anyone said it was made of unobtanium??
@@daemianbox Then how did the video "not age well"? We have videos of it being destroyed and other than that we have seen it shoot at empty forests. Made no impact on the conflict.
its high fire rate cannon make enemy soldier prone and hide, so their MBT can advance without worry being hit by javelin
Interesting but will it blend?
Impressive. And also, destroyed, near Kreminna.
Россия не потеряла ни одной машины Терминатор на Украине,не ври, это укропропоганда! Лучше посмотри как она их уничтожает!
yes, but succesfully killed a lot of ukraine... or nato soldiers?
@@diawannoto You should worry more about your 3 days invasion of Ukraine instead of Nato, for now :)
British and Intelligence are not normally 2 words that go hand in hand...
yeah, at the service of their puppet masters - poor British, they don't even realize they live in a plantation of slaves
🤣🤣😂🇷🇺💪 I love how you dismantled that British gay dog
The irony. Almost a year and you still haven’t gotten close to taking Kiev. What a joke.
Says the person whose army ran out of fuel 30km across their own border.
@@Aisatsana1971 The ''special operation'' is to DEMILITARISE and DENAZIFY Ukraine, that is why the Ukrainian's are dropping like flies, and good riddance to them.
@Military TV
The "Lite"/"Mini" version of the C&C Generals' Apocalypse Tank...
Targetpractice for Bayraktar!
Shut up idt
All TB 2 entering into Ukraine are wiped out within few days.
Look like u haven't count the number
Don't you find it funny that ever since the russians started to use their SAMs to protect their slowly advancing forces that almost all drones including the Bayraktar has become pretty much useless?
I guess you didn't notice the lack of new 'drone kino' supposedly wrecking russian armor. No new footage for months. That shows that the Bayraktar's time to shine has passed...
@@KondorDCS of course it's funny. How the orcs didn't use their SAMs until recently, that's funny.
Run, Forest, run as far as you can.
Stugna too!
next tech: outfitted with repair drone (for general minor repairs) ?
а теперь скажи умник-а что будет плохого в том если такой дрон и вправду будет имется?
It's best feature is self-termination. Then it can fly too. So lethal OMG
It is sad that Russian tank turrets are logging more total flight hours than the Russian Air Force.
@@swaghauler8334 and more sad a anto soldiers media life ij front line its not even days,, but hours..
@@lunarkparkes
You forgot to clarify: Ukrainian soldiers, specifically in Bajmut, live an average of 4 hours.
Russia have a fantastic range of war machines ,,, I'd love to see the secret stuff 😳
They don’t have secret stuff anymore. They don’t have the Soviet budget for secret wonderweapons.
Russia churning out tons of new groundbreaking kit like tsunami Poseidon torpedos , one to look out for is Russian EMP , aka the microwaver or putins speech “ I got high energy weapons “ . Some idiots can’t even get it’s not Soviet Union anymore, this is modern Russia
You know that even Russian generals and FSB agents are fleeing?
I'm happy and laughing at all the goofy weirdos like you. 🤣👍
@@jurgmeier4547 he’s a realist unlike you , You make up fiction as a rational argument . Which way is the battlefront going ? West
🤣 get off the drugs
I am curious about some things. Why the canon barrels are shaking so much during and after firing? Why is this vehicle so full of rust? Is 30mm enought? Why not 57mm?
It's an anti infantry vehicle. 30mm is enough for that.
A ha ha 🤦 😄 This is not rust, this is such a painting
Деривация(2С38) have 57mm gun
What exactly is covered with rust?
See if it's enough or not ?v=RXNLXgdjLUQ
How well it is at turret tossing?
it has no turret. lol
@@lexburen5932 the component moving in circles is a turret
Sounds great in theory, however in the cold light of dawn it's just another tank target to overflying UAVs. It's just another armoured target to the myriad of guided NATO anti tank missiles or mobile battery of M109 155mm SP guns. Plus devoid of dismountable infantry section to ferret out the MILAN teams. This strange doctrine of less infantry points towards a fear of treading Ukranian soil.
It was developed for Grozny. The lack of TRAINED infantry was the issue Russia was trying to address with this. It didn't pan out in Ukraine. There is no real substitute for SKILL in combined arms operations.
Okay, asshole. We realized that the USA is "The smartest and strongest" But where are your vaunted UAVs and ATGMs if the LPR is completely liberated
It is also going to be the first Target of an infantry anti-tank team
@@swaghauler8334 No, it was developed for urban warfare, based on the experience from the caucasus conflict, which is different.
EXCELLENT
The author forgot about automatic grenade systems (2 ) we have on the Terminator
Smoke launches with frag grenades loaded. Yup a super weapon.😎😁
@@vonSchwartzwolfe two 30 mm automatic grenade launchers (AGS-17)
Thank you for your video. I am watching you from Russia
I wouldn’t want to face that in combat
Why not, one Excalibur in enough to finish it. One that was sent to UA lasted for 18 hours before it got blown to smithereens.
@@iljavija Not before it had highly likely liquidated dozens of Ukr nooseys and obliterated several Ukr vehicles.
The Ruler is back
Other than the tank chassis this is less deadly than an upgunned Bradley.
Even the US Army says the Bradley is under-gunned.
🤣🤣🤣
Твой Бредли это гробовозка. Менее смертоносней чем Бредли это же надо такое ляпнуть.
The Bradley is a piece of junk. That's why they are shipping them to Ukraine to be dismantled for scrap.
From what I’ve been hearing lately..the terminator has been very successful in Ukraine especially when deployed with T-90Ms.Will have to wait and see though
these area useful to clear objective from infrantry
We can feel a little prejudice against the russian army in this video. Tanks are not as decisive as they use to be on the battlefield. They are threatened by dromes, airplanes, mines and the infantry have more ways than ever to destroy them. But armies still need them. Tanks have been proven not so effective in urbain warfare. The russian have experience the limits of the tanks in this kind of environement in different battleflied notably Syria where russians tanks have shown to be very vulerble agianst infantry operating in an urban environement. The ''terminator'' is an answer to this vulnerability with high velocity fire power and large angle of attack. The fact of replcing the canon by using rockets make also very much sense.
Best advice I have seen in this thread. BTW, Russians learned hard lessons regard tank use in urban environments in Chechen war too.
Albeit the purpose is very narrow.
There's a certain beauty in them.
Narrow? In cities it's crawling with hard-to-locate anti-tank stuff in (sometimes tall) buildings. It's the MBTs that have narrow vision.
Hmm... its dual autocannons?
Easy, rather than putting one Daka Daka. The Russians thought it'd be ingenius to put TWO Daka Dakas and have it capable of pointing straight up so no highrise building can save you when its around and THEN automate the turret so it doesn't need a person on the top to operate it, so even after destroying the turret. It might still be able to function with its components still intact. As if that wasn't enough, they also thought it'd be ingenius to slap not two but FOUR Vikhrs ATGMs on its side to shoot down far away low flying choppers or any MBTs that it'd see within its thermals.
I swear, the Russians. Like the United States Military Industrial Complex just thinks up whatever man made horrors beyond human comprehension and makes it a reality and puts a price tag on it.
this is literally just an uparmoured bmp with more elevation
US/NATO long ago chose war. Wtf you expect???
@@aniviamain309 Did you not see the video my guy?
ITS HIGHLY ARMORED
You can log a forest with one of those. Let loose a couple of Terminators and that will save the time and danger of falling trees.
Это комбаин - салонарезатель и жаровня ,нарезает и сразу же жарет бекон
Wow Terminator + Tanks = enemy doom
We managed to make the liquid one!
Nice tech no wonder the west offered big reword for capturing one
For it’s crew?
I have seen footage of them being used in forested areas in Ukraine.
It's meant to provide fire support to armor and infantry especially in urban enviroments. It's also not being used in Ukraine PROPERLY!
the only flaw of this tankis its twin 30mm
if it is a 75mm bofors or 57mm would be better in terms of penetration and anti drone capability
Yeah but twin cannons are cooler
🙄
@@FinalRepublic bang on
it would not be necessary for that because one, you can store much more ammo of 30mm than of 57mm or 75mm, secondly you don't need any extra pen on the 30mm because you have 4 ATGMs on this thing for destroying enemy armor and defensive positions (should you need to), you also have 2 30mm grenade launchers too that are able to fire over cover and destroy enemies hiding behind said cover, not to mention that a 57mm or 75mm would have far less of a rate of fire than 2 30mm and would be far less effective at suppressive fire which is extremely important in combat, and last but not least 2 30mm cannons are more than enough to destroy enemy APCs, IFVs, and motor vehicles, not to mention that 30mm shells are far cheaper to produce and produce in large quantities compared to 57mm and 75mm, and considering just about every other Russian APC and IFV uses 30mm shells it would also be much simpler for logistical reasons. also it's better to have 2 cannons than one because should one jam you have another cannon you can still use.
Is it just me who noticed that close up of the guns shows they are rusted
It's Tank machine hard mettal what do U want?
It's like most Russian armour, looks great on paper but in reality it's useless.
I believe only 2 or 3 of the originals in Ukraine have not been destroyed or sent back to Russia for repair.
@@losthero0 must read and learn a lot my friend...
So why the ukranians got bitten ,lossing every day ground and doing defensive retririting war then???You watch too much one-sided brainwashing mass media mate!
@@Mr777koko You need to tell your English teacher they failed.
@@Mr777koko keep cool...must wait ..sorry it's hard time for you to understand..
The era of remotely controlled weapons has arrived.
photoshopping an extra barrel on the gun makes its wayyyy more lethal
Those are dual 2A42 30mm guns, shared with BMP-2 and Ka-52 chopper. Also there is a PKTM machine gun.
@@Max_Da_G He's referring to the thumbnail, where the uploader has unnecessarily photoshopped a third 30mm barrel onto the turret, which seems silly to me too
@@pyrosish I didn't even look at the pic lol I thought he meant that BMPT only has one 30mm gun! Oooops...
What about a bigger shape charge missile that were made by countries that know what they are doing
Great Russian ♥️🇷🇺♥️
It can be as lethal as you like on paper. But its crew will be conscripts, the vehicle will likely have little to no maintenance schedule thus thrown tracks knackered transmission and jammed main armament and will have very few precision missiles to fire. Just look at Ukraine, AKA Russian IFV graveyard
These are not conscripts using these units. Russia is using "contract" forces as they call them which is Professional Voluntary Soldiers. The unit they embedded them into in Dec 21 is a professional unit.
@@Knight_Kin of course they need contractors. Their army is a joke, and they can't mobilize because the government is lying to their people about it not being a war, but a "special operation".
@@Knight_Kin professional replacing ERA with egg cartons and rubber sheets🤷🏻♂️
Ukraine declared the fourth total mobilization already. Russia has used only 30% of the military group concentrated before the war on the Ukrainian border, and did 2-3 full rotations of acting troops already... Ukraine is a graveyard for Ukrainians themselves and for thousands of foreign mercenaries from all the world!
@@maksimluzin1121 they'll keep coming, too. Russia has taken more casualties in 6 months than they did in their entire invasion of Afghanistan, which is really pathetic given their army's size compared to Ukraine.
Yeah Right. They Seem Quite "FRUSTRATED" even 11 months later...
Wait, wait, wait, you skipped some very important facts on to why this terminator is still around. By 2015 this project was shelved because the Russian government couldnt put an order because of financial difficulties due to western sanction, as this new tank required the installation of a new production line, new equipment and training of new workers.
Algeria asked for the 2 prototypes to be sent to them and after 10 months of testing they put and order of 300 units in april 2016 and PAID CASH IN ADVANCE to have the production line setup, basically saving the project.
In 2017 Russia put their order that should start receiving their 1st batch the very next year 2018 after the production line was setup and then started the Algerian order mid 2018 till end 2021. The rest of the Russian order was started after the Algerian order.
And that's why Algeria has 300 (some say over 300) and Russia recently (2022) started getting their units
Thin top armor...perfect for parades
Nope
@@mbtenjoyer9487 yup
This thing can single handed destroy any tank that USA and Germany deployed to Ukraine now. I hope soon we will see some footages how this thing devastate Abrams and Leopard 2.
and machines rose from the ashes of nuclear fire...
Can it turn invisable and disapear if it's arse is getting kicked ? I seem to remember that from the movies ? A move all of Russia might like to emulate soon ...... ??
But great for parades 😭 lol
Apparently in Ukraine it didn’t go very well for this machine 😄
Performs a valuable function
When it blows up, the Russians know they are engaging the enemy
@@jamesricker3997 None of them have been destroyed though, but they are also no longer in Ukraine. They were shipped back to Russia.
A lot of gay ass fanboying in here. Any proof, or is it the western propaganda bumping your gums from their hand up your ass, lol!?
Russia holds all but the entire Southeast of UKRAINE and does so at a numbers disadvantage of 3 to 1 for Ukraine. Russia is whooping that ass, but keep talking that Zelensky talk where he argues that Ukraine is retreating forward, and Russia is advancing bacwards, LMAO!
Sure it doesnt 😁
@@voidtempering8700 check again, they are easy prey for Excalibur ammo.
Don’t appeared to have been any good so far.
That turret looks highly vulnerable to blast damage
The important part is the hull…The turret is unmanned with a hull of a tank, this AFV is very survivable than all BMP variants.
У этой бмпт стоит Активная защита последнего поколения, так что поверь,эта штука и Абрамс в силах разобрать на запчасти
It doesn't look like it's designed to face down a main battle tank. Only main battle tanks are built for that role, with anti tank vehicle and man portable missiles filling in the rest.
@@Knight_Kin yes it is…it has ataka ATGMS capable of penetrating 800mm of composite armor.
@@Knight_Kin Он и не предназначен для борьбы с танками. Я только сказал что он может разобрать любой танк, при себе стоимости дешевле западного танка в несколько раз дешевле
It's weak armor makes it lethal for its crew.
In short - Nothing
Wait till you in the front…don’t be stupid
In short everything
@@elozinoemeovrode9779 yeah chopped like metballs..
terminator is extremely lethal only for its crew...
naturally. for this they use it to destroy their own crews. and in order to destroy the enemies, it is enough to lure them into the terminator.
Another fancy toy from Russia who can't show how good it is since they don't have enough of them, and out of the few they do, crews are poorly trained and commanders are to incompetent to use them.
Desesperation? Is deseperation try to protect ur tanks from the enemy in urban warfare?
In the first days of war russia lose a lot of heavy vehicles. Ad the terminator was more a solution
Ukrainians are taking them out with javelins... Not very impressive
@@Mal101M did you see the Ukrainian parade of Russian Vehicles destroyed in Kiev? Do you see Russian troops marching in Kiev? I think we both know who's talking truth here and it's not Russia and it's definitely not you
No reports of a terminator being taken out by a Javelin. Source?
@@Narukosaki Did you see how ukraine has lost 25% of their country now and none of their supposed counterattacks have achieved anything? Of course they can inflict losses on the russians, but considering that their losses are around 70k KIA....I wouldn't hold my breath for Ukraine's victory if I were you.
If getting destroyed by the impact of a Javelin = bad tank, then there is no such thing as a good tank, since the Javelin and other top attack AT weapons are practically lethal to any tank, and in case of the Javelin, even active protection systems, such as the throphy(israeli APS that is being adopted by the US military on newer Abrams tanks) can't stop a Javelin when its on top attack mode.
@@LoboalphaMASTER it's not only the machine it's the tactics that is used you might have the greatest tank of all time but if you have bad tactics you're going to lose
The most lethal about this tank is, that there are none on the front.
Taps forehead "Can't destroy what isn't there"
There's like, what, 14 T-14s produced so far?
No 125
@@skankshunts2156 doesn't matter how many they have if their army is too incompetent to keep them fueled. The whole world is laughing at them.
@@skankshunts2156 125 T14 ? my arse you little shrink head, they maybe dreaming of 125 T14s ;) lmfao
You are wrong
The shrapnel after a Tank Buster
They should have used Vikhrs ATGMs instead of Atakas to give it an anti air capability.
You know nothing about military hardware, little boy.
Regardless, russia is a junk country
this is bullshitt. why they dont bring the mighty t-90 to Ukraine? affraid of javelin or nlaw?
😂
I mean, Ukrainians shot down atleast 3 KA-52s with Stugna-P (an ATGM without proximity fuse), so i don't know why ruSSians can't do the same with Atakas.
Skill issue maybe? 😏
Or the fact that Vichrs are way too expensive for tanks to use 😏
@@pixelion1579 T-90s are already in Ukraine, what are you talking about?
Ese tanque hasta ahora sale a luz publica
We know how good Russian military veichles are in real ))) And everything is built on T-72😀
of course of course))) and in winter Russia only wins, you always said so before losing 😂
The German GEPARD has been upgraded way too much for a 1970's Design. Twin 30 mm cannons radar guided and Burst fire rate of 23 rounds per second.
But gepard is a anti air not a support vechicel
Only lethal to it's crew
Lots of Terminator tanks have been Terminated:)
both of us know that's bullshit, if any BMPT has been captured of destroyed the Ukranians would be full of propaganda like it was with the Moskva
2 was severely damaged, all 10 was retired from front...today zero in action
@@leneanderthalien need to know that
@@leneanderthalien Check again they are currently being used now
Looks like a cool vehicle, but also like propaganda type material.
As far as I know there are no Armata tanks or terminators in Ukraine. Plus seems there are no mass production of Armata series.
The BMP-T was actually deployed to Ukraine. I saw a video of it getting attack by artillery round (with another 2 tanks next to it). Not sure what happened to it cause all vehicles reversed and video ended. Cool to look at but it is junk. No news of it after months
I wouldn't believe US or UK.
Ah yes, a weapons system to fight the last war (Afghanistan) where there was a need for a vehicle whose main armament could elevate and depress to a far greater degree than what the Russian army had at the time - and which had weapons that could engage the enemy at ranges beyond what the enemy could engage. Seems to be a glorified infantry support vehicle/AAA weapons system. Infantry is moving along, sees a likely ambush point, have this thing toss a few 30mm rounds into the suspect spot and then move on.
I think the missile launchers, once they are empty, cannot be reloaded by the crew as it carries no spares. Also, against a force that has modern long range ATGWs, it might have a serious problem. And in the narrower confines of an urban environment, it is very vulnerable to top down attacks - like a babushka dropping a couple of grenades on top of it, or a basic RPG.
I Love this machine, In such small number's it is not a threat :)
This machine is a beast in urban warfare, just look at it's capabilities in close quarters and narrow passages.
@@Knight_Kin in cities itll still die to infantry, like any other vehicle
@@aniviamain309 ага-поэтому лучше вообще быть без брони-ведь ее все равно подобьют!-ты наверное какой то гений!ахаха
Don't worry, the drone(s) that watches over this thing is armed also. The newest system is completely automated, no crew required.
Скоро со стороны России будут воевать роботы и беспилотники.
Soo… aim for the head and it’s just a tracked coffin? Got it. Thanks.
Exactly
Like any tank... At first, try to hit such a small head from a range of 1-2 kilometers...
PICKUP BATTLEWAGONS aka Technical. Gave the military a lot of headaches.
Will make a fine Ukrainian yard ornament.
Funny thing is, there's been no confirmed destroyed BMPT. Not one photo or carcass.
Good for ukrainian agriculture too!
The funniest thing is that some of erm...people...truly believe this ;) See ya in a couple of years with that statement.
@@mosnicolae1678 next year's sunflowers will blossom like no other 🌻
@@rocketchicken5421 do you not remember the previous Russia/Ukraine conflict? Last I saw, every last russian commander was hunted down or assassinated even in their own headquarters. Those slavs are notorious for planting explosives targeting their adversaries. This is the second time around. You think third time will be the charm?🤷🏻♂️🌻
what makes bmpt letal ?
yeah that extra barrel photoshoped thumbnail
Most of all are in the sky now... 155 mm shells loves them , Javelin and N LOW loves them too, and what about antitank mines - nobody can even see were goes the turret after....
That’s a nice copium subscription you’re on. You must be giving your dealer your last penny. Terminators don’t have turrets, also only one has been destroyed so far after a year of fighting. Meanwhile Ukraine has close to 0 tanks left, their tank reserves have been so completely drained that they have to resort to begging the west to send them tanks.
T. 34. arriba montados soldados rumbo al campo de combate .plena llanura llena de nieve
RIP Ukraine
Ripping you and other orc lovers a new one 😅
If Close range to javelin it's just Russian made scrap metal 🤣🤣🤣😅
@@Nathan-xm5pu аха, ну да по 20 джавилинов на 1 танк да и то т 72 остаётся на ходу после попадания 3 джавилинов
There's only been around 20 made of each, and with a ban on optics and other military hardware it's doubtful Russia can make more. Those that are going to get made won't have anti-missile defenses, so they're just as vulnerable to Javelins and TOW missiles.
@@Psmerling They can always get those parts from China who despises NATO.
they manufacture 15 of those a month at the moment and have 300 some in service
It's so lethal cause you die when it gets hit with a javelin
Saw one of these today destroyed by a Ukrainian stugna p. They all blow up the same way. Slava Ukraine.
You saw shit in a heaping bowl of copium
Not true! Those filled with russian orcs blow higher :) Slava Ukraine!
@@Mal101M Saddam washed your brain. Wake up dude!
The best Ukr weapon is bullshit on the net, yay!
@@rocketchicken5421 they learned it fron russian orcs!
i don't understand why russian engineers like the twin cannons so much ( the ZU have 4 ) whenit is widely known that this solution lacks stability and precision to the guns .
Its the only way they could get two types of ammo avail to fire. One gun is loaded with AP ammo and the other with HE ammo.
Power + amount of lead, one gun jamming, heavy stable platform permits. Remember Russian Shilka shooting at much smaller fast moving targets.
@PEter Harrald Sorry your wrong they are fixed in place to each other. AP ammo in one gun HE ammo in the other. They could not get a dual ammo feed to work so they mounted two guns with different ammo. And the grenade launcher is a smoke launcher with frag grenades loaded in them.😎 Just so you know.
@PEter Harrald No its not. That was right from the builders of the breast.
@PEter Harrald Do some research. Its true data right from the builders of the breast.
Still easily taken out by a Javelin or NLAW
I doubt the Americans or the British have something that can take hits from Javelin and NLAW.
What’s your point? You’re saying an anti-tank missile can take out a tank? Man you must be a genius to be able to figure that out
@@starship9629 My point is they have been irrelevent in Ukraine.They aren't anything special is all
@@richlopez5896 And one more thing. Just because these can be taken out by a Javelin doesn't mean they're irrelevant or nothing special. By that logic, no tank on this planet is anything special and relevant
@@starship9629 They are irrelevent because Russia CAN'T put them into combat in Ukraine because they have very few and it is a big loss and propaganda to get it shown destroyed on social media like their T-90M was.They ARE irrelevent because they are just for parades like their T-14 tank is
Aunque muchos opinologos de la OTAN no les guste los rusos van avanzando
NATO is dead
Cierto. Pero no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver. Muchas películas de Hollywood. Se agrandan como pan en charco pero lo único que han peleado en los últimos 40 años fueron paises quebrados política y económicamente o pastores de ovejas en chanclas.
It's not a tank for starters...