If other religions are Mac OS and Windows, Hinduism is Linux, which is Open Source :) It allows you to come freely and build whatever you want without any restrictions or cost.
If praying or worshiping is the only criterion, then all Religions are same. However, Hinduism alone has the second option, useful for whole of humanity, but which is generally sidelined by orthodox vested interests. @gmybird
I think in name of ideas the speaker seems to be drifting the thought process which western term Hinduism is created around ..Hinduism is a thought process which has certain philosophy surrounding it .. It is based more on experience than set of Ideas ..The core philosophies surrounding all texts seems to be similar..
Absolutely. Oxford educated economist who has no working knowledge of Sanskrit is quick to lable everything inconvenient as smriti and offers the Vedas in a chronological order. Utter foolishness.
@@fitlit I dont know what you are complaining about. If you are complaining that he does not know sanskrit. Let me tell you, one doesn't have to be mathematician to know 2+2=4.
We don’t also need knowledge to know that if you touch fire it will burn or hurt you. Even 2+2 only if someone teaches us when we were kids we would know. Similarly no knowledge of shastras can also mean we are babies compared to it and unless we study it, we won’t know it’s entirety or whether to agree or disagree.
@@indc8954 how old are you boy ? Sanskrit has 73 words for water alone. It's a deva basha. You would understand why I was complaining, if you were rooted in tradition.
Being Indians and Sanathanis, we neither need to know anything or we should put any effort to know something about our own Dharmic tradition. We should just educate ourselves with British imposed Makhale designed no native value based out dated system amd above all we should keep sleeping forever so that one more invasion can happen to us internally or externally. Thereby ourselves allow for big time ethnically cleansed just like what has happened in Kashmir in 1990s to Hindu Pandits. Just commenting without undertanding, analyzing and learning from the past does not make much sense. Just remember Sanathana Dharma has allowed us to retain our civilization and heritage by our ancestor kings against multiple invasions in the past and all other civilizations could not survive to the one god culture invasions. That was the background with which I commented earlier. Definitely secular intellectuals will never understand that point 😀😀😀
Yes. Bhagavad gita(BG) heard by Sanjaya, not written by Sanjaya. He told Dhirthurastra that Lord Krishna spoke those information to Arjuna. BG did not say what the characters are doing like such as dancing, playing, singing, fighting, ruling, administration etc which is told in Mahabharatha. But BG told us how to live a life. Bhagavad Gita is the essence of Vedas. Vedas is like the derivation, Vedanta sutra is the formula. To understand the Vedas, one can study Vedanta sutra and many scholars like Sankaracharya and Ramanujacharya wrote commentary on Vedanta sutra. Why sire did not mention their names? Why don't you mention Veda Vyasa? They are also prophets. Please recollect the situation when all these information was spoken. That is, when people did not know the correct path of life and these saints came and simplify the process through Vedas. Mahabharatha and Ramayana are considered as the fifth Vedas. From which, one can learn how people live their life based on Vedas. Learned person knows whether the singer sings correct or not. He is a authority to say whether the singer sings in a correct way or not. So we need to get guidance from those authoritative person not from the person who gave false propaganda. If you want to know about Vedas, you must go through upanishads also. Prophets not only told and leave this world. They live life like that. Smirthi means which is remembered. Yes, how the people live a life in epics which has to be remembered. India won the world cup in cricket in 1983 and 2011. Can you say that India never won world cup ever? A cheater can say like that. In future, anyone can say like that. Can you mention any texts that say about yoga? In Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna talked about yoga not worldly matters. It clearly mentions how to attain God. It contains science. BG is not spoken to king at the leisure time. BG is spoken at the battle field. Sanjaya gave live commentary to king about the battle.
@@himadribhattacharya3337 do you know the meanings commentaries? Sanjaya Uvaca is told by Veda Vyaas. He told us Sanjaya gave Live commentaries to Dridhurastra and it is also known from the Mahabharata story Veda Vyaas gave this power to Sanjayaa. And we also have to look that Bhagavan Uvaca is told by Sanjaya of what Lord Krishna told Arjuna in the battlefield. These Bhagavat Gita Slokas is spoken by Lord Krishna at the battlefield.
BJP must felicitate gems like burqa dutt, oldmonk sadresai, marfa khannum, suvara baskard, pappu maino, piggy vadera etc who are working relentlessly for the upliftment of the party. Their services for building support for BJP have been very underappreciated. Please give them a seva medal atleast.
If you will undermine the smritis that's what you're going to learn from the Vedas the scriptures are in a series the answers are not for you to find rather they are given by the Shastrad themselves as you learn further I the SMRITIS and ithihasas.
Shruti means '"What Is Heard”, or more commonly, it comes from the divine. Where as Smriti means "What Is Remembered” and hence include mostly things written by Acharyas, who remembered it. Ithihasas like Mahabharata, and Ramayana can be considered as Smrithi. Then we have Puranas which are mostly works of Krishna Dwaipayana Vyasa, relating to the cosmological history or understanding of the Shruthi and Smrithi through many stories that happened in various multiverses at various timelines. And lastly we have Prakarana Grandhas like Shankaracharya's works which gives us a simpler understanding of Shruthi and Smrithi. I don't think the speaker quite understand the difference. You cannot make up Smrithi. They are already there. Defined. May be you can write a Prakarana Grantham interpreting the understanding, but for that you should have reached the understanding with thapa and sadhana. 🙏🏼
I do not understand what the problem with you guies is if you want to become a scientist you go to an institution then why do you think that just by yourself you'll become and expert in something as complex as "Shastras "..no definitely not you need a real scholar in that case...this debate that shruit is inferior to smriti is completely absurd..the shastras are in a sequence first comes the VEDAS they give you a generic idea about the origin yourself GOD etc..then the Upanishads they are still generic..then the Puranas which talk about the form of GOD and teach you about him in a story telling format..and then the ITIHASAS where GOD actually comes and teach you the message of HIS and to attract us so that we can get away from Maya and try to reach back to HIM..it is the best format of teaching first they teach you theoretically and then provide you with real life experiences this is what the SHASTRAS want you to know..Again i am repeating no one in this world who is unless blesses by GOD specifically can understand the SHASTRAS by HIMSELF...and there is a reason for that too...since we have this human form that is why it is for sure that we have experienced millions of births as an animal and number of births as a human..due to which we are strongly attached to MAYA or illusion of this world(potency of the Supreme GOD "KRISHNA")and a person attached to maya cannot understand the shastras perfectly only a person who has tried a lot in his life (current and previous one) to be detached from thus illusion can understand the Shastras that is why GOD and shastras lay stress on finding a bona-fide Guru and to learn under him the Shastras...and you don't have to capacity not anyone else in the universe to challenge BHAGWAD GEETA and it's words..and also no one else has the capability to write another BHAGWAD GEETA..as it's name is Song of the DIVINE GOD..and there are no two Gods.Thankyou HAREKRISHNA❤
not really. its the other way around - the abrahamics are the ones who want to coerce and convert. Hindus believe in acceptance of all faiths (but this has backfired and hence modern political hindutvavadis have begun to add a rider - "we believe in acceptance but only if you also believe in acceptance. if you are one of those who say 'there is no god except mine and hence you have to be converted or killed then to hell with you we dont accept you ' "))
I must say that this individual has been successful at not been able to truly comprehend the difference between the Hinduism and Sanatan Dharma. I suggest that perhaps this individual is in need of studying Shruti and Smriti and Bhagwat Gita and Ramayan or Vedas again in an objective manner with the intent to comprehend it's meaning rather than creating a peculiar explanation and stating a few Vedic Stotra.... Very Unfortunate
Why barka dutta is talking interest in these topics #jihadi atleast support your people . Don't think if you have taken this interview then you are on our team😂😂
If other religions are Mac OS and Windows, Hinduism is Linux, which is Open Source :) It allows you to come freely and build whatever you want without any restrictions or cost.
Fascinating ....a beautiful simile
Very interesting
Currently india….no way.
This is accurate
@@KaranSharmagpYou are confusing a thought with the state of a country.
Thank God she didn’t interrupt atleast in this part of the video
Prime Minister Modi has chosen the right person, Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal as his Chief Economic Advisor. 👍
he is bangali after all.
Sanyal is an inspiration :)
After this profound session on Sanathana Dharma, Barkhaji went missing from media. Heard she is seeking for answers 😀😀
Nobody can put it better than Sanjeev Sanyal. Amazing!
If praying or worshiping is the only criterion, then all Religions are same. However, Hinduism alone has the second option, useful for whole of humanity, but which is generally sidelined by orthodox vested interests. @gmybird
Beautifully spoken. Sanjeev is always my favourite
What a knowledgeable man .
Thank you Bharka for bringing Sanjeev
Initially I misread the channel name as the Aasmani kitaab
Bharka is very uncomfortable while explaining about Hinduism
yeah she seems so restless..
It's sad, even most Hindus don't know this.
Why all this is not taught in our schools and colleges
I think in name of ideas the speaker seems to be drifting the thought process which western term Hinduism is created around ..Hinduism is a thought process which has certain philosophy surrounding it .. It is based more on experience than set of Ideas ..The core philosophies surrounding all texts seems to be similar..
hinduism is all about kshatriyata...and living in harmony with nature
Hinduism is not a religion
It is a Dharmic tradition by letting you know about best practices of leading life
Absolutely. Oxford educated economist who has no working knowledge of Sanskrit is quick to lable everything inconvenient as smriti and offers the Vedas in a chronological order. Utter foolishness.
@@fitlit I dont know what you are complaining about. If you are complaining that he does not know sanskrit. Let me tell you, one doesn't have to be mathematician to know 2+2=4.
We don’t also need knowledge to know that if you touch fire it will burn or hurt you. Even 2+2 only if someone teaches us when we were kids we would know. Similarly no knowledge of shastras can also mean we are babies compared to it and unless we study it, we won’t know it’s entirety or whether to agree or disagree.
@@indc8954 how old are you boy ? Sanskrit has 73 words for water alone. It's a deva basha. You would understand why I was complaining, if you were rooted in tradition.
Being Indians and Sanathanis, we neither need to know anything or we should put any effort to know something about our own Dharmic tradition. We should just educate ourselves with British imposed Makhale designed no native value based out dated system amd above all we should keep sleeping forever so that one more invasion can happen to us internally or externally. Thereby ourselves allow for big time ethnically cleansed just like what has happened in Kashmir in 1990s to Hindu Pandits.
Just commenting without undertanding, analyzing and learning from the past does not make much sense.
Just remember Sanathana Dharma has allowed us to retain our civilization and heritage by our ancestor kings against multiple invasions in the past and all other civilizations could not survive to the one god culture invasions. That was the background with which I commented earlier. Definitely secular intellectuals will never understand that point 😀😀😀
barkha was so uncomfortable hearing so much about the religion she opposes
Wonderful explanation sir
Where can I see the full interview??
Yes. Bhagavad gita(BG) heard by Sanjaya, not written by Sanjaya. He told Dhirthurastra that Lord Krishna spoke those information to Arjuna. BG did not say what the characters are doing like such as dancing, playing, singing, fighting, ruling, administration etc which is told in Mahabharatha. But BG told us how to live a life. Bhagavad Gita is the essence of Vedas. Vedas is like the derivation, Vedanta sutra is the formula. To understand the Vedas, one can study Vedanta sutra and many scholars like Sankaracharya and Ramanujacharya wrote commentary on Vedanta sutra. Why sire did not mention their names? Why don't you mention Veda Vyasa? They are also prophets. Please recollect the situation when all these information was spoken. That is, when people did not know the correct path of life and these saints came and simplify the process through Vedas. Mahabharatha and Ramayana are considered as the fifth Vedas. From which, one can learn how people live their life based on Vedas. Learned person knows whether the singer sings correct or not. He is a authority to say whether the singer sings in a correct way or not. So we need to get guidance from those authoritative person not from the person who gave false propaganda. If you want to know about Vedas, you must go through upanishads also. Prophets not only told and leave this world. They live life like that. Smirthi means which is remembered. Yes, how the people live a life in epics which has to be remembered. India won the world cup in cricket in 1983 and 2011. Can you say that India never won world cup ever? A cheater can say like that. In future, anyone can say like that. Can you mention any texts that say about yoga? In Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna talked about yoga not worldly matters. It clearly mentions how to attain God. It contains science. BG is not spoken to king at the leisure time. BG is spoken at the battle field. Sanjaya gave live commentary to king about the battle.
No. BG is not a 'Live' commentary. It is in past tense. 'Sanjaya Uvacha' etc.
@@himadribhattacharya3337 do you know the meanings commentaries?
Sanjaya Uvaca is told by Veda Vyaas. He told us Sanjaya gave Live commentaries to Dridhurastra and it is also known from the Mahabharata story Veda Vyaas gave this power to Sanjayaa. And we also have to look that Bhagavan Uvaca is told by Sanjaya of what Lord Krishna told Arjuna in the battlefield. These Bhagavat Gita Slokas is spoken by Lord Krishna at the battlefield.
@@himadribhattacharya3337 English Premiere League also not live...delayed by few seconds...
Ha ha ha
Half knowledge more dangerous than no knowledge
Why this type of debate is always in British English language??
BJP must felicitate gems like burqa dutt, oldmonk sadresai, marfa khannum, suvara baskard, pappu maino, piggy vadera etc who are working relentlessly for the upliftment of the party. Their services for building support for BJP have been very underappreciated. Please give them a seva medal atleast.
what a knowledgeable person!!
Very well presented.thank you sir.
She rubbed her nose when heard the word "marxism" ..... Itchyyyyyyyy
Where can I fing the full interview?
wow.
Barkha looks shocked
Complex adaptive system.
👌👌👌👌
To me Hinduism is not a club you must have a membership card to enter and carry a banner.
I better follow Chelsea FC (both Men & Women)
If you will undermine the smritis that's what you're going to learn from the Vedas the scriptures are in a series the answers are not for you to find rather they are given by the Shastrad themselves as you learn further I the SMRITIS and ithihasas.
Shruti means '"What Is Heard”, or more commonly, it comes from the divine. Where as Smriti means "What Is Remembered” and hence include mostly things written by Acharyas, who remembered it. Ithihasas like Mahabharata, and Ramayana can be considered as Smrithi. Then we have Puranas which are mostly works of Krishna Dwaipayana Vyasa, relating to the cosmological history or understanding of the Shruthi and Smrithi through many stories that happened in various multiverses at various timelines. And lastly we have Prakarana Grandhas like Shankaracharya's works which gives us a simpler understanding of Shruthi and Smrithi. I don't think the speaker quite understand the difference. You cannot make up Smrithi. They are already there. Defined. May be you can write a Prakarana Grantham interpreting the understanding, but for that you should have reached the understanding with thapa and sadhana. 🙏🏼
I do not understand what the problem with you guies is if you want to become a scientist you go to an institution then why do you think that just by yourself you'll become and expert in something as complex as "Shastras "..no definitely not you need a real scholar in that case...this debate that shruit is inferior to smriti is completely absurd..the shastras are in a sequence first comes the VEDAS they give you a generic idea about the origin yourself GOD etc..then the Upanishads they are still generic..then the Puranas which talk about the form of GOD and teach you about him in a story telling format..and then the ITIHASAS where GOD actually comes and teach you the message of HIS and to attract us so that we can get away from Maya and try to reach back to HIM..it is the best format of teaching first they teach you theoretically and then provide you with real life experiences this is what the SHASTRAS want you to know..Again i am repeating no one in this world who is unless blesses by GOD specifically can understand the SHASTRAS by HIMSELF...and there is a reason for that too...since we have this human form that is why it is for sure that we have experienced millions of births as an animal and number of births as a human..due to which we are strongly attached to MAYA or illusion of this world(potency of the Supreme GOD "KRISHNA")and a person attached to maya cannot understand the shastras perfectly only a person who has tried a lot in his life (current and previous one) to be detached from thus illusion can understand the Shastras that is why GOD and shastras lay stress on finding a bona-fide Guru and to learn under him the Shastras...and you don't have to capacity not anyone else in the universe to challenge BHAGWAD GEETA and it's words..and also no one else has the capability to write another BHAGWAD GEETA..as it's name is Song of the DIVINE GOD..and there are no two Gods.Thankyou HAREKRISHNA❤
Hari Bol
@@mobile9973 HAREKRISHNA❤
It reminds me Amartya Sen’s “ Argumentative Indians”.
Barkha dutt is aquirming and uncomfortable
She prefers certain kinds of people... She would rather interview Umer Kehlid type...
Read the Bhagavad Gita,, only with krsna can we have eternal life, Hare krsna.
There is no only in Hinduism.
My way , your way all are correct ..unless they are the nature's way.
what is this lady i think she is quite uncomfortable in being a hindu
ater this session barkha started to hate islam..hha
Great finding...haha
Dont give work to this chndalan....👹👹
Hahaha....nice one
Best word to describe her! 🤣
This is Vedic philosophy- something modern political hindutvavadis will find problematic as it does not allow them to force dogmas on other people.
not really. its the other way around - the abrahamics are the ones who want to coerce and convert. Hindus believe in acceptance of all faiths (but this has backfired and hence modern political hindutvavadis have begun to add a rider - "we believe in acceptance but only if you also believe in acceptance. if you are one of those who say 'there is no god except mine and hence you have to be converted or killed then to hell with you we dont accept you ' "))
I must say that this individual has been successful at not been able to truly comprehend the difference between the Hinduism and Sanatan Dharma. I suggest that perhaps this individual is in need of studying Shruti and Smriti and Bhagwat Gita and Ramayan or Vedas again in an objective manner with the intent to comprehend it's meaning rather than creating a peculiar explanation and stating a few Vedic Stotra.... Very Unfortunate
wdym?
This is Vedic philosophy- something modern political hindutvavadis will find problematic as it does not allow them to force dogmas on other people.
Just a comedy show and two comedians are just fooling the foolish peoples
Really?? Go to Sunday school. You will get wisdom there
Nope real koned3 was faced by the scientist for stating facts which were contradicting bbl.
Why barka dutta is talking interest in these topics #jihadi atleast support your people . Don't think if you have taken this interview then you are on our team😂😂
Where can I find the full interview?
Where i can find full interview..?