Digital Number, Radiance, and Reflectance | Whiteboard Bloggers Series

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @alasdairsmith7116
    @alasdairsmith7116 4 роки тому +4

    Brilliant video, thanks - I'm a remote sensing student and it's nice to hear the fundamentals described so concisely and with such clarity.

  • @zachary74135
    @zachary74135 3 роки тому

    Read about this topic in one of my GIS textbooks and only understood about 1/3 of the information and it took 2-3 times the times. You have quite a knack for teaching! Thank you!

  • @c.teriallen3653
    @c.teriallen3653 5 років тому

    Hi Peg, I agree with the rest of folks here. Thank you for the simpler way of explaning DN, Rad and RefL. I am writing a landcover change detection and i am including this on my citation. Good job!

  • @hm.91
    @hm.91 2 роки тому

    Incredible explanation. Thank you so much!

  • @ejipci
    @ejipci 4 роки тому

    Only suggestion. Technically, reflectance is an inherent property of a material (along with trans. and absorption). It is a result or consequence of a ratio of incident hemispherical irradiance (for example, excluding the more specific directional BRDF) and exitance from a material. The residual is then called the quantity "reflectance". i.e., I often teach it as, "what did the material do (i..e, abs, refl, transmit) to the incident radiation" Semantics. :) Nice job !

  • @mahyarmasoudi7192
    @mahyarmasoudi7192 10 років тому +1

    So informative, precise and concise ...

  • @barbara165
    @barbara165 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much! great video and explanation!!

  • @sisho5781
    @sisho5781 9 років тому +2

    most commercial satellite imagery offers radiometrically corrected imagery (eg WV GE) but dont say if its full radiometric correction (meaning including atmospheric correction) or just converting DNs to at-sensor radiance and to at-sensor reflectance . Is there any way to tell that indeed radiometric correction has been applied, like whats the pixel values become or through image stats? Thanks

  • @topografer
    @topografer 7 років тому

    Nice job. Simplicity is genious

  • @puneethshankar460
    @puneethshankar460 7 років тому

    The necessary links to the blog posts keyed in here in the description would be appreciated. Thanks for the video

  • @ST-is9gs
    @ST-is9gs 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for great video

  • @petriforsstrom7198
    @petriforsstrom7198 8 років тому

    Thank you for your clear presentation.

  • @carolinajimenezgomez2498
    @carolinajimenezgomez2498 7 років тому

    Hi, I am working with some data of Landsat 5 and I am wondering what to do with the information after calculate the radiance and then the reflectance for each pixel of the image, I mean, do I have to save them into different images? Or do I have to make a kind of merge of them to get a resulting image with information about ground recognition? Thank you.
    PD: I really liked your video, you make it very simple to understand

  • @iliassfahmi3785
    @iliassfahmi3785 6 років тому

    Thanks it was very informative for me !

  • @rebwarakram1289
    @rebwarakram1289 8 років тому

    very good video.

  • @Iki9aiTech
    @Iki9aiTech 10 років тому

    Awesome! Thanks

  • @imrankabir8922
    @imrankabir8922 5 років тому

    What is the tool for converting DN to radiance?

  • @nuraisahnahar7942
    @nuraisahnahar7942 7 років тому

    i cannot find your blog about the digital number radiance and reflectance , when i search for it ,it will come out harris geospatial.
    are your blog in harris geospatial ,but why i cant find it. can someone help me?? i need it.

    • @flotin9743
      @flotin9743 6 років тому +1

      www.harrisgeospatial.com/Learn/Blogs/Blog-Details/TabId/2716/ArtMID/10198/ArticleID/16278/Digital-Number-Radiance-and-Reflectance.aspx