Dharma must win no matter what.Justice must prevail. In Mahabharatham, everyone did mistakes including Yudhishtira who gambled away his Queen Draupadi. Even the all mighty Bhishmacharya stood there like a stone, did nothing while the dethrobbing of Draupadi happened. Vasudheva Shri Krishna, ensured Dharma is upheld at all cost. Mahabharat war was unstoppable and so it happened. It is the greatest lesson to all mankind. Jai Vasudheva Shri Krishna 🙏
And nobody did anything when arrogant Draupadi insulted Duryodhana and his Father who is her King too when they were guests at her house. Krishna did not admonish her nor the elders. She should have been punished for committing les majeste and not even having common decency.
@@devannayar6456 Don't mind it was wrong. Droupadi didn't say such things to Kauravas. It was explained by some experts. Actually their weapons were snatched because duryodhan was aggresive beacause of the death of Shishupal. Sri Krishna wouldn't have supported if that would have happened.
@@mohuasamaddar4175Yeah whatever they keep creating new versions of this story to make the Pandavas more and more heroic even though the original version itself would have been biased since everyone knows history is written by winners. Example: America dropped 2 nukes in WW2 on innocent civilians when Japan was already losing the war, yet history says they were heroes of WW2. In fact they only went to war when they got attacked and before that they were supplying food and ammunition to both sides and making profit.
Why nobody speaks of Draupadi's arrogance in insulting her King and Prince Duryodhana against the canons of hospitality and good manners ?She is no innocent woman but arrogant and rather immoral allowing herself to be used by 5 men.
U forgot to mention about Karna. And FYI it was Karna who insulted Draupadi, not Dronacharya. Dronacharya was silent just like Bhishma in the great assembly hall. The real three powerful warriors in the Kauravas were the pupils of Parshurama. They were Bhishma, Dronacharya & Karna. It is because of these three persons, Duryodhana had the audacity to fight against Krishna & his protected disciples, the Pandavas. When those three were slain by the Pandavas, they (Pandavas) had won the war. The war of 18 days in the Kurukshetra Theatre.
@@prime8krish as if anything written in past by mentally crazy people of the past is anything true lol. U say only in kali yuga right? Then what kind of punishment did angada receive for raping mandodhari(ravana's wife) ? Ravana threatened Sita to be his wife, but never did he commit those crimes without her consent! This story is about treta yug right?
@@ravitejalingadhalli6301 do u know what "folklore" mean? The so-called epic "Ramayana" was handed down orally first. The one written by Valmiki omitted many of the wrongdoing in order to promote hinduism same with Vyasa's Mahabharata..... It's all part of folklore.... All the variations are true...
Its not understood why Mahabharata is seen only as Pandavas and Kauravas. It actually started much before from King Bharat. The strongest character of Mahabharat was Queen Satyavati, the wife of king Shantanu. She ruled for almost 60 years. When Shantanu died she had 2 children. When they died she called ved vyas and then ruled till Pandu became king. Then when Pandu died she supervised the kingdom and ruled efficiently till she finally left for the forest. But she has never got the appreciation she deserved. Often the person who adminsters so efficiently that they anticipate a problem and take corrective action in advance. That's what Satyavati did and ruled very efficiently. But never appreciated
The strongest character of Mahabharat is Sri Krishna, the avatar of Paramathman Narayana himself according to the 4 Supreme Texts of Indian Culture & Hinduism: Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita. Nothing can happen with his will. But Narayana gives free will to all Athman, to choose their own paths, including Shakti Purana people & ur Queen Satyavati
@@roopalivelayudhan7911 Have you not read the Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Gita? The one in charge is always Parabrahma Narayana. Yes, he gives each athman free will. But also allows them their just Karma. This applies to the multiverse. Male or Female, humans were never in charge, not even of kurukshetra.
The seeds for Mahabharata war were laid a lot before the Pandavas were born. Started from Shantanu who ignored his son Devavratha who was ready for marriage and lusted after a girl much younger than his son. From there things started to go wrong.
@@ambiliramachandran5739 his mother didn't gave birth to him, god gifted him to Kunti.. whereas Gandhari gave birth to Duryodhana herself ( also if were talking about the elder one, Karna he is the eldest)
@@the_roses6728 Everyone was literally unaware Of The Birth of Karna and If We are Talking about the real Paternity Lemme Say you something That Both Dhritharashtra and Pandu were Not Vichitraveeeya's Sons They were The sons Of Vedvyas...Then How Come Pandu and Dhritharashtra Have The right on Simhasan?
@@the_roses6728he is talking about his father. Basically had to give the throne to his younger brother because he was blind but it’s always that the oldest gets the throne so it is not clear if it was a temporary arrangement until Dhyrodhana grows up or permanent arrangement. So there is a genuine debate on who the kingdom goes to because of unusual circumstances.
Main reason Duryodhana lost was because none of his commanders were loyal to him due to various perhaps unavoidable reasons, even his close friend Karna. Had Karna had not known that Pandavas were his brothers on his mother's side, he sure would have slain Yudhishtir, Nakul and Sahadev and perhaps Bheem too. That said, then Arjuna was capable of destroying Kaurava army all by himself. But again, the main reason perhaps why Duryodhana did not win was that Krishna was protecting the Pandavas and Karna was deprived of his armor which has rendered him almost invincible. Had Karna not been deprived of his armor, not even Krishna and Arjuna fighting together could have defeated him, Krishna mentions this fact after Karna's death. So Krishna was main reason for the victory of Pandavas. Duryodhana committed many tactical blunders too that did not help.
Arjuna could not beat Bhisma, Drona & Karna. This is why krishna had to interfere. Arjuna stands for people who walk the path of Dharma & Bhishma, Drona & Karna are the opponents they will face. Bhishma is type of guy who thinks keeping promises is more important that doing what is right. Drona is the kind of guy who is obsessed with his son/family rather than doing what is right for all. Karna is the guy who is Dharmic, but helps his Adharmic friends & family instead of doing what is right. Although, they are more powerful, Paramathman narayana will always aid the Dharmic.
Bheeshma alone could wiped out entire Pandavas, He chose not to and when he did Krishna protected breaking his oath. Remind you, Krishna asked Arjuna to walk far from the chariot when he was still on it and when Krishna got down, it exploded. Krishna explains the power of weapons used by Bheesma.
@@roopalivelayudhan7911 Let me clear up your misconceptions. The main reason Duryodhana lost the war wasn’t due to any lack of loyalty from his commanders or unforeseen issues; it was because Duryodhana deliberately chose the path of unrighteousness, leading to his downfall despite having more soldiers and support. According to the Mahābhārata, none of his commanders were disloyal-they supported him blindly, leading to their own ruin. And let’s get real about Karna. Even if he hadn’t known the Pandavas were his brothers, he still wouldn’t have been able to defeat Yudhishthira, Nakul, Sahadev, or even Bhima, who was four times stronger than him. Arjuna alone could have decimated the Kaurava army. The real reason for Duryodhana’s defeat is simple: he walked the path of Adharma, whereas Krishna protected the Pandavas because they adhered to Dharma. Karna’s so-called greatness is overrated. His invincibility came from divine armor, not his own prowess. This armor was given by the God, not made by him. So why is Karna being given credit for something that wasn’t his creation? Krishna, the ultimate God Nārāyaṇa, created that armor, making him far superior to Karna. So, what makes you think that the very God who *created* that armor would be powerless against it? Sounds like a contradiction wrapped in wishful thinking. Sri Krishna’s support of the Pandavas was not because of Karna’s armor but because the Pandavas followed the path of Dharma (righteousness). Duryodhana’s loss was primarily due to his choices, not just tactical errors. Arjuna, without divine armor, faced Karna and defeated him with sheer skill and courage. Krishna helps those who walk the path of Dharma, not those who rely on divine gifts or follow Adharma. So, let’s not distort the facts-Duryodhana’s downfall was a result of his own misdeeds, not just Krishna’s interventions or the stripping of Karna's armor given by the God.
Duryodhana's words before the final fight: He knew he is defeated, dejected and he tells Yudhuistir why he was unfiit and useless as a king, because he offered to take the weapons of his choice and pick anyone of the pandava for fight and that will be decisive. :-) Duryodhana tells, " I could pick Mace and shatter you or Arjuna. I could pick Bow and Arrow and kill Bheem but I have no desire to live or rule, I lost my brothers, freinds and .." I always wanted to fight to win Bheem, my arch rival and I die in glory I pick Mace and choose Bheem " This is why we need kings we are smart not righteous .. I wish this war did not happen, it weakened Bharat and never recovered.
Most of the people will get offended if I say Krishna was a grey character both sides did mistakes and both sides never acknowledged their faults for example Draupadi and Bheem disrespect karna because of his caste, yugistaran gambling his wife and country but only kuvravas mistakes counts why is that ? Off course disrespecting a women is the most evil thing but let’s be more realistic
@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable. You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were. Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi. So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.
The Pandavas betrayed their country why staking it in a game of dice instead of fighting for it like leaders. I don’t blame Dhyrudhona for cheating his enemies to get their entire kingdom without spilling an ounce of blood for it. But then him and Karna got carried away and started torturing Droupathi because of the grudge they had on her. I think she was snobbish that’s why they hated her. As per their law no one can own another man’s wife but Karna told Dhyrudhona that she is married to 5 people and shared among them so she is a prostitute not a wife.
Duryodhana would have won, by upholding Dharma. He would have been made Emperor, regardless. But Mahabharata had to happen, its a play for teaching the people who will be born in Kaliyug. Those precious athman, who will walk the path of Dharma in the darkest of age, need it.
He ruled well, kingdom was happy, he grew his kingdom but Yudhisthir was a Idiot, he put not once twice he gambled, put Drupadi as object in gambling, he lost period done. After he lost, Drupadi does not belong to Pandava in true sense, if you think that is immoral to say, well have that sense before you put her in the gambling. Then Duryodhan was offered weapons of his choice and pandava to fight of his choice, stupid he could have picked mace and killed Yudhistir instantly.
@@granand exactly. See, the purpose was to write Mahabharata, to guide humans in this realm, in Kali yuga. Else Narayana can just switch off simulation from Vaikunta itself. Nothing here is real any way. This is all done to educate Athman with knowledge of Dharma & Adharma. Not all athman are same, some are new athman, some are old athman, some are intelligent, learn fast, some are not. So, every one is being guided across multiple lives towards Moksha, where they break the cycle of rebirth, after learning of Dharma-Adharma through world experience. This is the actual concept of Athman-Paramathman in the vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita.
If Duryodhana was unrighteous, what about the Pandavas ? They fought dishonorably, lied, cheated at every turn. Duryodhana's defeat was noble and dharmic but Pandava and Krishna's victory was ignoble and Adharma. ADraupadi, she was an arrogant, shameless woman who insulted Duryodhana and his father who was her King too. And shameless women who slept with 5 men like her shameless mother in law Kunti who too was promiscuous when her husband turned impotent.
@@devannayar6456 Wow, look at you trying to outdo God Himself in defining what’s righteous and just! Do you really think you know better than Sri Krishna, the very Creator of the universe, who made the Pandavas and Kauravas? If the Pandavas were the lying, cheating villains you’re trying to paint them as, do you think the Almighty would have supported them? Absolutely not. Let’s get real here: the Pandavas didn’t cheat anyone; it was the Kauravas who stooped to cheating during the dice game. They tried to strip the Pandavas of their kingdom, their dignity, and their very existence. But nice try flipping the script. And as for your baseless insults against Draupadi and Kunti-save it. The truth is that Draupadi stood up for herself against injustice, and Kunti did what she had to for the sake of Dharma. If you think hurling insults at them makes your argument stronger, you’re sadly mistaken. It just shows how desperate you are to justify the Kauravas’ crimes. But guess what? Krishna supported the Pandavas because they upheld Dharma, and no amount of twisted logic can change that.
Yeah I agree they were both wrong. But Dhyrudhona was a good king, he broke the caste system 5000 years. What is surprising is he donated a part of his kingdom to make Karna a king even though he was of lower caste but refused to give 11 villages to his own cousins to avoid war with them. He wasn’t greedy he just selectively hated the Pandavas.
@@bkit5 Logically, Duryodhana was the Crown Prince as his father is the King. But he should have given the villages to the Pandavas as a good strategy though he was not obliged to. But also there is no guarantee that the Pandavas will not start a rebellion against the King after getting the villages !
baseless...🤦🏾 if u had taken Mahabharata logically (instead of this krishna pseudo godly version) it is evident that Pandavas were more sinful than Kauravas
this looks more like a depopulation agenda of those times. we can't take the ancient scriptures from around the world just granted for their face value. apart from the optimistic heavenly traits, we also see lot of deception in this creation. “Don't just teach your children to read. Teach them to question what they read. Teach them to question everything.” "This is NOT good work. If this is the best god can do, I am NOT impressed." ~ George Carlin
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 So, you’re comparing ancient scriptures that have guided civilizations for millennia to a “depopulation agenda”? Really? Let’s not get carried away with half-baked theories wrapped in trendy skepticism. Ancient scriptures like the Mahābhārata aren’t just about stories; they carry deep philosophical insights, moral lessons, and the essence of Dharma, which have stood the test of time. Sure, questioning is important-that’s how we learn. But questioning doesn’t mean dismissing centuries of wisdom just because it doesn’t fit a modern-day cynical narrative. It’s one thing to critique, and another to outright reject profound teachings without fully understanding them. As for George Carlin’s quote, it's amusing in a stand-up routine, but let's not confuse comedy with theology. If you’re not impressed with the divine workings of the universe, maybe that’s more about your perspective than the actual design. You can question all you want, but dismissing the value of these texts without grasping their deeper meaning? Now that’s not impressive.
@@jaydutta7711 sorry sir, one needs to question everything, even according to scriptures, that's is called research. god only knows how much those scriptures are corrupted by evil forces before reaching you, especially in this highly deceptive age. it is up to you, if you want to take everything by the face value. ultimately, rishis like buddha & other ancient sages gained & confirmed the knowledge only through "tapas" (meditation), which they documented for the less capable humans. anyways i can't say anything if you conclude that, people questioning as dismissal. please let me know what you advice a person bitten by a poisonous creature - to get anti-venom treatment in the clinic first or go to a "mantra" specialist first? regarding gorge carlin it's ok to have your own opinion, but logic is to finally grasping the meaning of a statement whether it's told in a comedy show or in a puranic movie. 😀
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, really? I see you're quite the self-proclaimed expert on questioning and research, but let me enlighten you. In Sanatan Dharma, questioning God is perfectly fine for gaining knowledge, but passing judgment on Him? That's out of your league. No human is on par with God to judge His actions or intentions. Our scriptures, written by sage Vedavyasa, are safeguarded by divine protection and are not tainted by any 'evil forces.' They're authentic and reliable. And before you lecture me on 'tapas' and other sages, remember this: God’s messages aren’t up for debate or distortion by human opinions. They’re divine truths, untouched and uncorrupted. So, if you're bitten by a poisonous creature, would you consult a 'mantra' specialist or get actual medical treatment? Similarly, don’t mistake questioning for judging. Stick to questioning for knowledge, but don’t cross the line into unwarranted judgment. Your opinions might be amusing, but they don’t hold a candle to the divine wisdom of our scriptures. Cheers! 🥂
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, is that the best comeback you've got? Because it sounds pretty weak and irrational. It's funny how you dismiss actual knowledge from the author of the Mahābhārata, who literally wrote the epic, while spouting off your own irrational, uninformed opinions. Before you try to sound clever next time, make sure you’re not just proving my point. Cheers to you too! 🥂 😉
Images are made with AI for better understanding and making a good experience however content is 100% research by us however due to many different versions of scriptures there might be some differences (You can always share your thoughts in comment section 🙏)
@@Oorjaofficial A child watching first time Chakravyuga launched by Drona asked if it was the prototype Drone. Perhaps after several years of getting older and Researching, the answer will emerge ...
@@Oorjaofficial Well follow Ved Vyasa one , that is original , i can idea other aspects from other authors but who is trustworthy The saint who segregated and organised long Ved into four organised parts or someone else.
Yeah disrobing a woman who married 5 men ? Ask Yudhistir and Pandavas who put their wife in the gambling ? you lose you lose. She was disrobed becuase she insulted and laughed at Duryodhan. To start with, It is Drithrashtra's kingdom by birth elder and he proved by ruling, but ruling by proxy because pandu died ? Sorry not buying it. Mahabharata was never meant to right or wrong, Lord Krishna used them as pawns as he was here to convey Gita, the essence of life rest is just a collateral.
@@granand Oh, so now you're justifying the disrobing of a woman because she was married to five men? That's the level of logic we're dealing with? Let’s get something straight: Draupadi’s humiliation was a result of Duryodhana’s sick ego and nothing else. And before you throw Yudhishthir’s gambling mistake in the mix, remember that the Pandavas regretted it deeply, faced the consequences, and sought forgiveness from Lord Krishna. Duryodhana, on the other hand, reveled in his Adharma without an ounce of remorse. As for Dhritarashtra’s claim to the throne, let's not forget that his kingdom was in ruins because of his blind love for his unrighteous son. Pandu ruled righteously, and the kingdom flourished under him. But I guess those facts don’t fit your narrative, right? And please, spare me the "Krishna used them as pawns" argument. Lord Krishna, the embodiment of Dharma, was there to ensure that justice prevailed. If the Pandavas were truly as dishonorable as you claim, would the Supreme Being have supported them? Absolutely not. The truth is, Krishna stood by them because they upheld Dharma, despite their flaws. So, if you're not buying the real story, that's on you, but don't twist the facts to justify the Adharma of Duryodhana and the Kauravas.
@@jaydutta7711 😂😂 number of people with single digit IQ. .who justified disrobing ? Who is justified because she is married to 5 men. She is a property of Duryodhan & co. She is a property pawned by useless & idiot Yudhistir & lost, next time read either Mahabharata or read every post here. Go back & read why Draupadi watched Duryodhan in naked & laughed in Mayasabha..she also secretly loved Karna ..try something good logic
*@virginboi4654* “Krishna may have won” ?? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
*@virginboi4654* “Krishna may have won” ?? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
@@girishbabu7275Krishna’s goal was to hold dharma as ISKON claims, people have twisted everything because Krishna was on the Pandavas side. The Pandavas were not angles. Krishna said the war was part of events that need to happen on earth. If you notice all knowledge of special powers were wiped out after his war. There was no one left to teach.
@@bkit5 Wow, look at you trying to outdo God Himself in defining what’s righteous and just! Do you really think you know better than Sri Krishna, the very Creator of the universe, who made the Pandavas and Kauravas? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
Karna supported the Duryodhana who tried to disrobed Draupadi and also told lies to Parshuram there are many acts we will soon bring a video about it ♥️♥️ Whereas Sri Krishna need to sacrifice his army, parents early and his whole kingdom still stay on righteous path
@@Oorjaofficial It has nothing to do with disrobing Draupadi. Shakti Purana always try to link with wom. It has to do with Adharma that Kaurava committed even before that. The disrobing incident was the last straw. There was mountain of adharma behind it.
@@Oorjaofficial Those brothers married the same woman and the eldest gambled with his wife. How were they righteous? Also Draupati was the one who insulted dhuryodhana and his father, Also dhiryodhana was supposed to be king as his father was eldest son so was he.. It was his rights
@@the_roses6728not only that. These Pandava brothers just sat and watched their eldest brother gamble away their entire country instead of punching him in the face and dragging him out of there. It’s not about personal feelings and respect towards your brother when the idiot is playing with the entire country and millions of lives. Lucky Dhyroyodhana was good king and so the people didn’t suffer in fact he was a much better king who cared for his people and never discriminated his citizens based on caste like everyone else at that time.
There was no such incident in MB wherein Lord Krishna and Dhuyodhana meet. This is a false narrative. Quote the sloka # and in which parva it appears to authenticate it. This is your imagination to gain cheap popularity. Please stop such imaginative narratives that destroys the sanctity of 5th veda. Foreigners cannot understand MB. It has to be understood by being a desciple of a Guru.
If you read the Mahabharatha epic properly, Vyasa version, you find that Duryodhana did fight and kept fighting but like Yudhishtira he beat a retreat whenever he perceived a threat to his life. As his death would end the war. Thrice Duryodhana struck Bheem with arrows making him faint during Bhishma parva. Like Duryodhana was more like playing the role of a boss. Bosses does not do work regularly, right?
Most of the people will get offended if I say Krishna was a grey character both sides did mistakes and both sides never acknowledged their faults for example Draupadi and Bheem disrespect karna because of his caste, yugistaran gambling his wife and country but only kuvravas mistakes counts why is that ? Off course disrespecting a women is the most evil thing but let’s be more realistic
@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable. You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were. Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi. So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.
It’s because Krishna chose to help Arjuna when he asked. They think it’s automatically justice if Krishna got involved because he is god who slayed all the evil demons before and is incarnation of Vishnu. They forgot even gods make mistakes when they take human birth. Krishna could have just told Karna that the Pandavas were his brothers when Dhyrudhona was refusing to settle for peace. Dhyrudhona would have listen to Karna to give them 12 villages that Krishna offered. or Karna himself would have given his own kingdom on behalf of Dhyrudhona to stop the war.
@@bkit5 Seriously? You’re suggesting that God, who created the universe, makes mistakes just because He took a human form? That’s a pretty bold and absurd claim for someone who’s clearly not on the same intellectual plane as the Almighty. Lord Krishna’s actions are always just and aligned with divine principles, no matter how they appear in human terms. The idea that He should have told Karna or Duryodhana what to do shows a fundamental misunderstanding of divine justice. Krishna didn’t need to spell out every detail because His plans were beyond human comprehension. It’s not about what you think should have happened; it’s about what was in line with the grand cosmic order. If you’re going to question divine decisions, maybe start by understanding the full scope of divine wisdom instead of throwing around baseless critiques. The creator of the universe (Sri Kṛṣṇa, i.e., Nārāyaṇa) doesn’t need to answer to mere mortals like you for His actions or decisions. Remember, Sri Krishna didn’t choose to help Arjuna for free, but because Arjuna fought for Dharma. That’s why the divine being supported him-he earned that support through his adherence to righteousness. Arjuna also faced countless challenges. The difference is, Arjuna didn’t let his circumstances dictate his morality. Karna did, and that’s why he ended up on the losing side.
@@jaydutta7711go read the scriptures, gods themselves make mistakes and pay the price for it when they take birth that’s why it’s important to get out of the cycle of birth. Read your own ISKON books properly, they give all explanations of how Krishna is always correct and never makes mistakes but they also mention what I said also.
Dharma must win no matter what.Justice must prevail. In Mahabharatham, everyone did mistakes including Yudhishtira who gambled away his Queen Draupadi. Even the all mighty Bhishmacharya stood there like a stone, did nothing while the dethrobbing of Draupadi happened. Vasudheva Shri Krishna, ensured Dharma is upheld at all cost. Mahabharat war was unstoppable and so it happened. It is the greatest lesson to all mankind. Jai Vasudheva Shri Krishna 🙏
And nobody did anything when arrogant Draupadi insulted Duryodhana and his Father who is her King too when they were guests at her house. Krishna did not admonish her nor the elders. She should have been punished for committing les majeste and not even having common decency.
@@devannayar6456 Don't mind it was wrong. Droupadi didn't say such things to Kauravas. It was explained by some experts. Actually their weapons were snatched because duryodhan was aggresive beacause of the death of Shishupal. Sri Krishna wouldn't have supported if that would have happened.
@@mohuasamaddar4175Yeah whatever they keep creating new versions of this story to make the Pandavas more and more heroic
even though the original version itself would have been biased since everyone knows history is written by winners. Example: America dropped 2 nukes in WW2 on innocent civilians when Japan was already losing the war, yet history says they were heroes of WW2. In fact they only went to war when they got attacked and before that they were supplying food and ammunition to both sides and making profit.
Why nobody speaks of Draupadi's arrogance in insulting her King and Prince Duryodhana against the canons of hospitality and good manners ?She is no innocent woman but arrogant and rather immoral allowing herself to be used by 5 men.
U forgot to mention about Karna. And FYI it was Karna who insulted Draupadi, not Dronacharya. Dronacharya was silent just like Bhishma in the great assembly hall. The real three powerful warriors in the Kauravas were the pupils of Parshurama. They were Bhishma, Dronacharya & Karna. It is because of these three persons, Duryodhana had the audacity to fight against Krishna & his protected disciples, the Pandavas. When those three were slain by the Pandavas, they (Pandavas) had won the war. The war of 18 days in the Kurukshetra Theatre.
You mean AI forgot to mention
@@atom8926 AI can’t make the videos bro, humans use AI to do it
Bro karna did not insult draupadi it was duryodhana
@@aaravrathi8221 kya baat kar rhe ho, draupadi ko Karna ne hi vaishya kaha tha
*Karn *Drona
Those who win are the righteous ones. Words of Krishna himself
Jai shri Krishna
History is written by the winners..... And the winners will never say they were the unrighteous ones.
Haha.. learn about Yugas, only in Kali yuga the lies persists longer. In other Yuga's truth prevails.
@@prime8krish as if anything written in past by mentally crazy people of the past is anything true lol.
U say only in kali yuga right?
Then what kind of punishment did angada receive for raping mandodhari(ravana's wife) ? Ravana threatened Sita to be his wife, but never did he commit those crimes without her consent! This story is about treta yug right?
@@nishikun867u seems to read it from some other adaptation than original Valmiki Ramayan version
@@ravitejalingadhalli6301 do u know what "folklore" mean? The so-called epic "Ramayana" was handed down orally first. The one written by Valmiki omitted many of the wrongdoing in order to promote hinduism same with Vyasa's Mahabharata..... It's all part of folklore.... All the variations are true...
Who told U this .....@@nishikun867
Its not understood why Mahabharata is seen only as Pandavas and Kauravas.
It actually started much before from King Bharat.
The strongest character of Mahabharat was Queen Satyavati, the wife of king Shantanu.
She ruled for almost 60 years. When Shantanu died she had 2 children. When they died she called ved vyas and then ruled till Pandu became king. Then when Pandu died she supervised the kingdom and ruled efficiently till she finally left for the forest.
But she has never got the appreciation she deserved.
Often the person who adminsters so efficiently that they anticipate a problem and take corrective action in advance. That's what Satyavati did and ruled very efficiently.
But never appreciated
Thanks for suggesting we will try to bring a dedicated video however we already have a short video dedicated to Queen Satyavati
Yes
The strongest character of Mahabharat is Sri Krishna, the avatar of Paramathman Narayana himself according to the 4 Supreme Texts of Indian Culture & Hinduism: Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita. Nothing can happen with his will. But Narayana gives free will to all Athman, to choose their own paths, including Shakti Purana people & ur Queen Satyavati
Satyavathi was assisted by Bheeshma but yes, it was Sathyavathi who was in charge, more like a Regent.
@@roopalivelayudhan7911 Have you not read the Vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Gita? The one in charge is always Parabrahma Narayana. Yes, he gives each athman free will. But also allows them their just Karma. This applies to the multiverse. Male or Female, humans were never in charge, not even of kurukshetra.
Yatho Dharmahasthatho Krishna,
Yatho Krishnahasthatho Jayaha..
Which means: Krishna stands with Dharma,
victory stands with Krishna. Period.
The seeds for Mahabharata war were laid a lot before the Pandavas were born. Started from Shantanu who ignored his son Devavratha who was ready for marriage and lusted after a girl much younger than his son. From there things started to go wrong.
Its Krishna who is ultimate truth. Nothing in the world can win against him.
This time he will loose
@@AH-tx4ce He never lose in any time. The time is under control of almighty God Sri Krishna, not vise versa. Understand?
@@jaydutta7711 he will bro he believe me
He has already lost everything now
In this last war he will be defeated and thrown in fire
Jai Shree Krishna
Lord Krishna will never lose. No one while He protects will ever lose, even in his/her toughest battles.
Mahabharat was Queens gambit accepted line.
Absolutely bullshit. Those brothers married the same woman and the eldest gambled with his wife. How were they righteous?
I agree also duryodhava was meant to be king as his father was the eldest son and so what he
@@the_roses6728No But Yuddhishtir Was elder Than Dhuryodhan
@@ambiliramachandran5739 his mother didn't gave birth to him, god gifted him to Kunti.. whereas Gandhari gave birth to Duryodhana herself ( also if were talking about the elder one, Karna he is the eldest)
@@the_roses6728 Everyone was literally unaware Of The Birth of Karna and If We are Talking about the real Paternity Lemme Say you something That Both Dhritharashtra and Pandu were Not Vichitraveeeya's Sons They were The sons Of Vedvyas...Then How Come Pandu and Dhritharashtra Have The right on Simhasan?
@@the_roses6728he is talking about his father. Basically had to give the throne to his younger brother because he was blind but it’s always that the oldest gets the throne so it is not clear if it was a temporary arrangement until Dhyrodhana grows up or permanent arrangement. So there is a genuine debate on who the kingdom goes to because of unusual circumstances.
Main reason Duryodhana lost was because none of his commanders were loyal to him due to various perhaps unavoidable reasons, even his close friend Karna. Had Karna had not known that Pandavas were his brothers on his mother's side, he sure would have slain Yudhishtir, Nakul and Sahadev and perhaps Bheem too. That said, then Arjuna was capable of destroying Kaurava army all by himself. But again, the main reason perhaps why Duryodhana did not win was that Krishna was protecting the Pandavas and Karna was deprived of his armor which has rendered him almost invincible. Had Karna not been deprived of his armor, not even Krishna and Arjuna fighting together could have defeated him, Krishna mentions this fact after Karna's death. So Krishna was main reason for the victory of Pandavas. Duryodhana committed many tactical blunders too that did not help.
Arjuna could not beat Bhisma, Drona & Karna. This is why krishna had to interfere. Arjuna stands for people who walk the path of Dharma & Bhishma, Drona & Karna are the opponents they will face. Bhishma is type of guy who thinks keeping promises is more important that doing what is right. Drona is the kind of guy who is obsessed with his son/family rather than doing what is right for all. Karna is the guy who is Dharmic, but helps his Adharmic friends & family instead of doing what is right. Although, they are more powerful, Paramathman narayana will always aid the Dharmic.
Bheeshma alone could wiped out entire Pandavas, He chose not to and when he did Krishna protected breaking his oath. Remind you, Krishna asked Arjuna to walk far from the chariot when he was still on it and when Krishna got down, it exploded. Krishna explains the power of weapons used by Bheesma.
@@roopalivelayudhan7911 Let me clear up your misconceptions. The main reason Duryodhana lost the war wasn’t due to any lack of loyalty from his commanders or unforeseen issues; it was because Duryodhana deliberately chose the path of unrighteousness, leading to his downfall despite having more soldiers and support. According to the Mahābhārata, none of his commanders were disloyal-they supported him blindly, leading to their own ruin.
And let’s get real about Karna. Even if he hadn’t known the Pandavas were his brothers, he still wouldn’t have been able to defeat Yudhishthira, Nakul, Sahadev, or even Bhima, who was four times stronger than him. Arjuna alone could have decimated the Kaurava army. The real reason for Duryodhana’s defeat is simple: he walked the path of Adharma, whereas Krishna protected the Pandavas because they adhered to Dharma.
Karna’s so-called greatness is overrated. His invincibility came from divine armor, not his own prowess. This armor was given by the God, not made by him. So why is Karna being given credit for something that wasn’t his creation? Krishna, the ultimate God Nārāyaṇa, created that armor, making him far superior to Karna. So, what makes you think that the very God who *created* that armor would be powerless against it? Sounds like a contradiction wrapped in wishful thinking. Sri Krishna’s support of the Pandavas was not because of Karna’s armor but because the Pandavas followed the path of Dharma (righteousness).
Duryodhana’s loss was primarily due to his choices, not just tactical errors. Arjuna, without divine armor, faced Karna and defeated him with sheer skill and courage. Krishna helps those who walk the path of Dharma, not those who rely on divine gifts or follow Adharma. So, let’s not distort the facts-Duryodhana’s downfall was a result of his own misdeeds, not just Krishna’s interventions or the stripping of Karna's armor given by the God.
jay shree krsna
Duryodhana's words before the final fight: He knew he is defeated, dejected and he tells Yudhuistir why he was unfiit and useless as a king, because he offered to take the weapons of his choice and pick anyone of the pandava for fight and that will be decisive. :-) Duryodhana tells, " I could pick Mace and shatter you or Arjuna. I could pick Bow and Arrow and kill Bheem but I have no desire to live or rule, I lost my brothers, freinds and .." I always wanted to fight to win Bheem, my arch rival and I die in glory I pick Mace and choose Bheem " This is why we need kings we are smart not righteous .. I wish this war did not happen, it weakened Bharat and never recovered.
Most of the people will get offended if I say Krishna was a grey character both sides did mistakes and both sides never acknowledged their faults for example Draupadi and Bheem disrespect karna because of his caste, yugistaran gambling his wife and country but only kuvravas mistakes counts why is that ? Off course disrespecting a women is the most evil thing but let’s be more realistic
@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable.
You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were.
Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi.
So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.
The Pandavas betrayed their country why staking it in a game of dice instead of fighting for it like leaders. I don’t blame Dhyrudhona for cheating his enemies to get their entire kingdom without spilling an ounce of blood for it. But then him and Karna got carried away and started torturing Droupathi because of the grudge they had on her. I think she was snobbish that’s why they hated her. As per their law no one can own another man’s wife but Karna told Dhyrudhona that she is married to 5 people and shared among them so she is a prostitute not a wife.
Yatra Yogeshwarah Krishna, Yatra Partho Dhanurdharah, Tatra DmShrir Vijayo Bhutir.. .
Jay shri radhe radhe
Duryodhana would have won, by upholding Dharma.
He would have been made Emperor, regardless. But Mahabharata had to happen, its a play for teaching the people who will be born in Kaliyug. Those precious athman, who will walk the path of Dharma in the darkest of age, need it.
He ruled well, kingdom was happy, he grew his kingdom but Yudhisthir was a Idiot, he put not once twice he gambled, put Drupadi as object in gambling, he lost period done. After he lost, Drupadi does not belong to Pandava in true sense, if you think that is immoral to say, well have that sense before you put her in the gambling. Then Duryodhan was offered weapons of his choice and pandava to fight of his choice, stupid he could have picked mace and killed Yudhistir instantly.
@@granand yeah, but you need to understand Kaliyuga was beginning. Paramathman Narayana had to make Mahabharata in order to guide people in Kali yuga.
@@granand even goras are finding guidance in Mahabharata & Gita.
@@drinkinman86 That is what I said right. all were pawns and no point talking about dharma, Lord Krishna just manipulated so Gita can be delivered.
@@granand exactly. See, the purpose was to write Mahabharata, to guide humans in this realm, in Kali yuga. Else Narayana can just switch off simulation from Vaikunta itself. Nothing here is real any way. This is all done to educate Athman with knowledge of Dharma & Adharma. Not all athman are same, some are new athman, some are old athman, some are intelligent, learn fast, some are not. So, every one is being guided across multiple lives towards Moksha, where they break the cycle of rebirth, after learning of Dharma-Adharma through world experience. This is the actual concept of Athman-Paramathman in the vedas, Ramayana, Mahabharata & Gita.
Jai Suyodhana Sarvabhouma 🙏🙏🙏 Jai Surya Putra Angaraja Maharathi Rashmiratha Angaraja Radheya Karna 🏹🏹🏹
CRYING in pain ONLY.
If Duryodhana was unrighteous, what about the Pandavas ? They fought dishonorably, lied, cheated at every turn. Duryodhana's defeat was noble and dharmic but Pandava and Krishna's victory was ignoble and Adharma. ADraupadi, she was an arrogant, shameless woman who insulted Duryodhana and his father who was her King too. And shameless women who slept with 5 men like her shameless mother in law Kunti who too was promiscuous when her husband turned impotent.
@@devannayar6456 Wow, look at you trying to outdo God Himself in defining what’s righteous and just! Do you really think you know better than Sri Krishna, the very Creator of the universe, who made the Pandavas and Kauravas? If the Pandavas were the lying, cheating villains you’re trying to paint them as, do you think the Almighty would have supported them? Absolutely not.
Let’s get real here: the Pandavas didn’t cheat anyone; it was the Kauravas who stooped to cheating during the dice game. They tried to strip the Pandavas of their kingdom, their dignity, and their very existence. But nice try flipping the script.
And as for your baseless insults against Draupadi and Kunti-save it. The truth is that Draupadi stood up for herself against injustice, and Kunti did what she had to for the sake of Dharma. If you think hurling insults at them makes your argument stronger, you’re sadly mistaken. It just shows how desperate you are to justify the Kauravas’ crimes. But guess what? Krishna supported the Pandavas because they upheld Dharma, and no amount of twisted logic can change that.
Yeah I agree they were both wrong. But Dhyrudhona was a good king, he broke the caste system 5000 years. What is surprising is he donated a part of his kingdom to make Karna a king even though he was of lower caste but refused to give 11 villages to his own cousins to avoid war with them. He wasn’t greedy he just selectively hated the Pandavas.
@@bkit5 Logically, Duryodhana was the Crown Prince as his father is the King. But he should have given the villages to the Pandavas as a good strategy though he was not obliged to. But also there is no guarantee that the Pandavas will not start a rebellion against the King after getting the villages !
baseless...🤦🏾
if u had taken Mahabharata logically (instead of this krishna pseudo godly version) it is evident that Pandavas were more sinful than Kauravas
this looks more like a depopulation agenda of those times. we can't take the ancient scriptures from around the world just granted for their face value. apart from the optimistic heavenly traits, we also see lot of deception in this creation.
“Don't just teach your children to read. Teach them to question what they read. Teach them to question everything.”
"This is NOT good work. If this is the best god can do, I am NOT impressed."
~ George Carlin
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 So, you’re comparing ancient scriptures that have guided civilizations for millennia to a “depopulation agenda”? Really? Let’s not get carried away with half-baked theories wrapped in trendy skepticism. Ancient scriptures like the Mahābhārata aren’t just about stories; they carry deep philosophical insights, moral lessons, and the essence of Dharma, which have stood the test of time.
Sure, questioning is important-that’s how we learn. But questioning doesn’t mean dismissing centuries of wisdom just because it doesn’t fit a modern-day cynical narrative. It’s one thing to critique, and another to outright reject profound teachings without fully understanding them.
As for George Carlin’s quote, it's amusing in a stand-up routine, but let's not confuse comedy with theology. If you’re not impressed with the divine workings of the universe, maybe that’s more about your perspective than the actual design. You can question all you want, but dismissing the value of these texts without grasping their deeper meaning? Now that’s not impressive.
@@jaydutta7711 sorry sir, one needs to question everything, even according to scriptures, that's is called research. god only knows how much those scriptures are corrupted by evil forces before reaching you, especially in this highly deceptive age. it is up to you, if you want to take everything by the face value. ultimately, rishis like buddha & other ancient sages gained & confirmed the knowledge only through "tapas" (meditation), which they documented for the less capable humans. anyways i can't say anything if you conclude that, people questioning as dismissal. please let me know what you advice a person bitten by a poisonous creature - to get anti-venom treatment in the clinic first or go to a "mantra" specialist first? regarding gorge carlin it's ok to have your own opinion, but logic is to finally grasping the meaning of a statement whether it's told in a comedy show or in a puranic movie. 😀
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, really? I see you're quite the self-proclaimed expert on questioning and research, but let me enlighten you. In Sanatan Dharma, questioning God is perfectly fine for gaining knowledge, but passing judgment on Him? That's out of your league. No human is on par with God to judge His actions or intentions. Our scriptures, written by sage Vedavyasa, are safeguarded by divine protection and are not tainted by any 'evil forces.' They're authentic and reliable.
And before you lecture me on 'tapas' and other sages, remember this: God’s messages aren’t up for debate or distortion by human opinions. They’re divine truths, untouched and uncorrupted. So, if you're bitten by a poisonous creature, would you consult a 'mantra' specialist or get actual medical treatment? Similarly, don’t mistake questioning for judging. Stick to questioning for knowledge, but don’t cross the line into unwarranted judgment. Your opinions might be amusing, but they don’t hold a candle to the divine wisdom of our scriptures. Cheers! 🥂
@@jaydutta7711 thanks for making me realise to not waste my time with your crappy opinions 😀. well, cheers to u too.
@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, is that the best comeback you've got? Because it sounds pretty weak and irrational. It's funny how you dismiss actual knowledge from the author of the Mahābhārata, who literally wrote the epic, while spouting off your own irrational, uninformed opinions. Before you try to sound clever next time, make sure you’re not just proving my point. Cheers to you too! 🥂 😉
Ai content...half knowledge is always dangerous...not appropriate
Images are made with AI for better understanding and making a good experience however content is 100% research by us however due to many different versions of scriptures there might be some differences (You can always share your thoughts in comment section 🙏)
@@Oorjaofficial A child watching first time Chakravyuga launched by Drona asked if it was the prototype Drone. Perhaps after several years of getting older and Researching, the answer will emerge ...
Pandaavaas and Kauraavaas
The Third reason you narrated is made up, 3rd reason which Duryodhan gave was not making Ashwathama supreme commander of his army.
There are many versions of stories we are mention 2 of them do check full video
@@Oorjaofficial Well follow Ved Vyasa one , that is original , i can idea other aspects from other authors but who is trustworthy The saint who segregated and organised long Ved into four organised parts or someone else.
Abbey itni accent kyun maar raha hai....please speak Indian english
Yeah disrobing a woman who married 5 men ? Ask Yudhistir and Pandavas who put their wife in the gambling ? you lose you lose. She was disrobed becuase she insulted and laughed at Duryodhan. To start with, It is Drithrashtra's kingdom by birth elder and he proved by ruling, but ruling by proxy because pandu died ? Sorry not buying it. Mahabharata was never meant to right or wrong, Lord Krishna used them as pawns as he was here to convey Gita, the essence of life rest is just a collateral.
@@granand Oh, so now you're justifying the disrobing of a woman because she was married to five men? That's the level of logic we're dealing with? Let’s get something straight: Draupadi’s humiliation was a result of Duryodhana’s sick ego and nothing else. And before you throw Yudhishthir’s gambling mistake in the mix, remember that the Pandavas regretted it deeply, faced the consequences, and sought forgiveness from Lord Krishna. Duryodhana, on the other hand, reveled in his Adharma without an ounce of remorse.
As for Dhritarashtra’s claim to the throne, let's not forget that his kingdom was in ruins because of his blind love for his unrighteous son. Pandu ruled righteously, and the kingdom flourished under him. But I guess those facts don’t fit your narrative, right?
And please, spare me the "Krishna used them as pawns" argument. Lord Krishna, the embodiment of Dharma, was there to ensure that justice prevailed. If the Pandavas were truly as dishonorable as you claim, would the Supreme Being have supported them? Absolutely not. The truth is, Krishna stood by them because they upheld Dharma, despite their flaws.
So, if you're not buying the real story, that's on you, but don't twist the facts to justify the Adharma of Duryodhana and the Kauravas.
@@jaydutta7711 😂😂 number of people with single digit IQ. .who justified disrobing ? Who is justified because she is married to 5 men. She is a property of Duryodhan & co. She is a property pawned by useless & idiot Yudhistir & lost, next time read either Mahabharata or read every post here. Go back & read why Draupadi watched Duryodhan in naked & laughed in Mayasabha..she also secretly loved Karna ..try something good logic
Krishna may have won but his power failed 2 defeat 2
Shakuni and duryodhana
Shakuni for his goal
Suryodhana for his ego and hatred
*@virginboi4654* “Krishna may have won” ?? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
*@virginboi4654* “Krishna may have won” ?? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
Defeating those 2 were not lord Krishna's goal....
@@girishbabu7275Krishna’s goal was to hold dharma as ISKON claims, people have twisted everything because Krishna was on the Pandavas side. The Pandavas were not angles. Krishna said the war was part of events that need to happen on earth. If you notice all knowledge of special powers were wiped out after his war. There was no one left to teach.
@@bkit5 Wow, look at you trying to outdo God Himself in defining what’s righteous and just! Do you really think you know better than Sri Krishna, the very Creator of the universe, who made the Pandavas and Kauravas? Are you intoxicated or something? Krishna is the almighty God, so he unquestionably won every war. His power, as mentioned in the Mahabharata, is unlimited. Hence, his power never failed to defeat Shakuni and Duryodhana. He defeated them due to their ego and animosity towards the Kauravas and Pandavas.
Karna was righteous. Yet Krishna tricked him. Those who claim to uphold righteousness can not be a hypocrite. Inherent logic implies unrighteousness.
Karna supported the Duryodhana who tried to disrobed Draupadi and also told lies to Parshuram there are many acts we will soon bring a video about it ♥️♥️ Whereas Sri Krishna need to sacrifice his army, parents early and his whole kingdom still stay on righteous path
@@Oorjaofficial It has nothing to do with disrobing Draupadi. Shakti Purana always try to link with wom. It has to do with Adharma that Kaurava committed even before that. The disrobing incident was the last straw. There was mountain of adharma behind it.
@@Oorjaofficial Those brothers married the same woman and the eldest gambled with his wife. How were they righteous? Also Draupati was the one who insulted dhuryodhana and his father, Also dhiryodhana was supposed to be king as his father was eldest son so was he.. It was his rights
@@the_roses6728she didn't insulted dury. Its not treu.
@@the_roses6728not only that. These Pandava brothers just sat and watched their eldest brother gamble away their entire country instead of punching him in the face and dragging him out of there. It’s not about personal feelings and respect towards your brother when the idiot is playing with the entire country and millions of lives. Lucky Dhyroyodhana was good king and so the people didn’t suffer in fact he was a much better king who cared for his people and never discriminated his citizens based on caste like everyone else at that time.
There was no such incident in MB wherein Lord Krishna and Dhuyodhana meet. This is a false narrative. Quote the sloka # and in which parva it appears to authenticate it. This is your imagination to gain cheap popularity. Please stop such imaginative narratives that destroys the sanctity of 5th veda. Foreigners cannot understand MB. It has to be understood by being a desciple of a Guru.
If you read the Mahabharatha epic properly, Vyasa version, you find that Duryodhana did fight and kept fighting but like Yudhishtira he beat a retreat whenever he perceived a threat to his life. As his death would end the war. Thrice Duryodhana struck Bheem with arrows making him faint during Bhishma parva. Like Duryodhana was more like playing the role of a boss. Bosses does not do work regularly, right?
Dude, learn to pronounce the names properly.
It’s for English speaking audiences we are planning to get Hindi videos separately soon ♥️♥️
@@Oorjaofficial Yes, it is very clear, ur not an Indian. For the Indian audience, ur pronunciation is painful!!
Most of the people will get offended if I say Krishna was a grey character both sides did mistakes and both sides never acknowledged their faults for example Draupadi and Bheem disrespect karna because of his caste, yugistaran gambling his wife and country but only kuvravas mistakes counts why is that ? Off course disrespecting a women is the most evil thing but let’s be more realistic
@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable.
You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were.
Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi.
So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.
It’s because Krishna chose to help Arjuna when he asked. They think it’s automatically justice if Krishna got involved because he is god who slayed all the evil demons before and is incarnation of Vishnu. They forgot even gods make mistakes when they take human birth. Krishna could have just told Karna that the Pandavas were his brothers when Dhyrudhona was refusing to settle for peace. Dhyrudhona would have listen to Karna to give them 12 villages that Krishna offered. or Karna himself would have given his own kingdom on behalf of Dhyrudhona to stop the war.
@@bkit5 Seriously? You’re suggesting that God, who created the universe, makes mistakes just because He took a human form? That’s a pretty bold and absurd claim for someone who’s clearly not on the same intellectual plane as the Almighty. Lord Krishna’s actions are always just and aligned with divine principles, no matter how they appear in human terms. The idea that He should have told Karna or Duryodhana what to do shows a fundamental misunderstanding of divine justice. Krishna didn’t need to spell out every detail because His plans were beyond human comprehension. It’s not about what you think should have happened; it’s about what was in line with the grand cosmic order. If you’re going to question divine decisions, maybe start by understanding the full scope of divine wisdom instead of throwing around baseless critiques. The creator of the universe (Sri Kṛṣṇa, i.e., Nārāyaṇa) doesn’t need to answer to mere mortals like you for His actions or decisions. Remember, Sri Krishna didn’t choose to help Arjuna for free, but because Arjuna fought for Dharma. That’s why the divine being supported him-he earned that support through his adherence to righteousness. Arjuna also faced countless challenges. The difference is, Arjuna didn’t let his circumstances dictate his morality. Karna did, and that’s why he ended up on the losing side.
@@jaydutta7711go read the scriptures, gods themselves make mistakes and pay the price for it when they take birth that’s why it’s important to get out of the cycle of birth. Read your own ISKON books properly, they give all explanations of how Krishna is always correct and never makes mistakes but they also mention what I said also.