Відео

@@devannayar6456 Wow, look at you trying to outdo God Himself in defining what’s righteous and just! Do you really think you know better than Sri Krishna, the very Creator of the universe, who made the Pandavas and Kauravas? If the Pandavas were the lying, cheating villains you’re trying to paint them as, do you think the Almighty would have supported them? Absolutely not. Let’s get real here: the Pandavas didn’t cheat anyone; it was the Kauravas who stooped to cheating during the dice game. They tried to strip the Pandavas of their kingdom, their dignity, and their very existence. But nice try flipping the script. And as for your baseless insults against Draupadi and Kunti-save it. The truth is that Draupadi stood up for herself against injustice, and Kunti did what she had to for the sake of Dharma. If you think hurling insults at them makes your argument stronger, you’re sadly mistaken. It just shows how desperate you are to justify the Kauravas’ crimes. But guess what? Krishna supported the Pandavas because they upheld Dharma, and no amount of twisted logic can change that.

Yeah I agree they were both wrong. But Dhyrudhona was a good king, he broke the caste system 5000 years. What is surprising is he donated a part of his kingdom to make Karna a king even though he was of lower caste but refused to give 11 villages to his own cousins to avoid war with them. He wasn’t greedy he just selectively hated the Pandavas.

@@bkit5 Logically, Duryodhana was the Crown Prince as his father is the King. But he should have given the villages to the Pandavas as a good strategy though he was not obliged to. But also there is no guarantee that the Pandavas will not start a rebellion against the King after getting the villages !

@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable. You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were. Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi. So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.

It’s because Krishna chose to help Arjuna when he asked. They think it’s automatically justice if Krishna got involved because he is god who slayed all the evil demons before and is incarnation of Vishnu. They forgot even gods make mistakes when they take human birth. Krishna could have just told Karna that the Pandavas were his brothers when Dhyrudhona was refusing to settle for peace. Dhyrudhona would have listen to Karna to give them 12 villages that Krishna offered. or Karna himself would have given his own kingdom on behalf of Dhyrudhona to stop the war.

@@bkit5 Seriously? You’re suggesting that God, who created the universe, makes mistakes just because He took a human form? That’s a pretty bold and absurd claim for someone who’s clearly not on the same intellectual plane as the Almighty. Lord Krishna’s actions are always just and aligned with divine principles, no matter how they appear in human terms. The idea that He should have told Karna or Duryodhana what to do shows a fundamental misunderstanding of divine justice. Krishna didn’t need to spell out every detail because His plans were beyond human comprehension. It’s not about what you think should have happened; it’s about what was in line with the grand cosmic order. If you’re going to question divine decisions, maybe start by understanding the full scope of divine wisdom instead of throwing around baseless critiques. The creator of the universe (Sri Kṛṣṇa, i.e., Nārāyaṇa) doesn’t need to answer to mere mortals like you for His actions or decisions. Remember, Sri Krishna didn’t choose to help Arjuna for free, but because Arjuna fought for Dharma. That’s why the divine being supported him-he earned that support through his adherence to righteousness. Arjuna also faced countless challenges. The difference is, Arjuna didn’t let his circumstances dictate his morality. Karna did, and that’s why he ended up on the losing side.

@@jaydutta7711go read the scriptures, gods themselves make mistakes and pay the price for it when they take birth that’s why it’s important to get out of the cycle of birth. Read your own ISKON books properly, they give all explanations of how Krishna is always correct and never makes mistakes but they also mention what I said also.

@@michaeljoby5244 Oh, so now you’re trying to reduce the supreme divine, Sri Krishna, to a “grey character”? Let’s get one thing straight: Krishna isn’t some flawed human being with shades of grey-He’s the ultimate God, the embodiment of Dharma. To even compare Him to the moral failings of mere mortals like the Kauravas is laughable. You’re trying to play the “both sides” card, but here’s the reality check: Krishna didn’t support the Pandavas because they were flawless; He supported them because they stood for Dharma. And as for Draupadi and Bheem “disrespecting” Karna? Let’s not twist the narrative. Karna chose the path of Adharma when he sided with Duryodhana and participated in that disgraceful dice game. His caste wasn’t the issue-his choices were. Yudhishthira’s gambling was a mistake, but unlike the Kauravas, the Pandavas acknowledged their faults and faced the consequences. Krishna Himself ensured that the Kauravas paid for their crimes, especially for the unforgivable act of attempting to disrobe Draupadi. So, let’s drop the “realistic” nonsense. If you think a mere mortal’s moral compass can judge God Almighty, you’ve completely missed the essence of the Mahābhārata. Krishna’s actions are beyond your black-and-white thinking-He’s the ultimate judge, and He doesn’t need your flawed human logic to justify His divine plan.

The Pandavas betrayed their country why staking it in a game of dice instead of fighting for it like leaders. I don’t blame Dhyrudhona for cheating his enemies to get their entire kingdom without spilling an ounce of blood for it. But then him and Karna got carried away and started torturing Droupathi because of the grudge they had on her. I think she was snobbish that’s why they hated her. As per their law no one can own another man’s wife but Karna told Dhyrudhona that she is married to 5 people and shared among them so she is a prostitute not a wife.

@@granand Oh, so now you're justifying the disrobing of a woman because she was married to five men? That's the level of logic we're dealing with? Let’s get something straight: Draupadi’s humiliation was a result of Duryodhana’s sick ego and nothing else. And before you throw Yudhishthir’s gambling mistake in the mix, remember that the Pandavas regretted it deeply, faced the consequences, and sought forgiveness from Lord Krishna. Duryodhana, on the other hand, reveled in his Adharma without an ounce of remorse. As for Dhritarashtra’s claim to the throne, let's not forget that his kingdom was in ruins because of his blind love for his unrighteous son. Pandu ruled righteously, and the kingdom flourished under him. But I guess those facts don’t fit your narrative, right? And please, spare me the "Krishna used them as pawns" argument. Lord Krishna, the embodiment of Dharma, was there to ensure that justice prevailed. If the Pandavas were truly as dishonorable as you claim, would the Supreme Being have supported them? Absolutely not. The truth is, Krishna stood by them because they upheld Dharma, despite their flaws. So, if you're not buying the real story, that's on you, but don't twist the facts to justify the Adharma of Duryodhana and the Kauravas.

@@jaydutta7711 😂😂 number of people with single digit IQ. .who justified disrobing ? Who is justified because she is married to 5 men. She is a property of Duryodhan & co. She is a property pawned by useless & idiot Yudhistir & lost, next time read either Mahabharata or read every post here. Go back & read why Draupadi watched Duryodhan in naked & laughed in Mayasabha..she also secretly loved Karna ..try something good logic

English peoples have mild pronunciation its difficult to adapt

It is not Gautam Buddha, it’s Swaminarayan Bhagwan.

That’s a different story too but what matter’s most in the present choices he made which could have made life better after the initial suffering due to his past life

Haha.. learn about Yugas, only in Kali yuga the lies persists longer. In other Yuga's truth prevails.

@@prime8krish as if anything written in past by mentally crazy people of the past is anything true lol. U say only in kali yuga right? Then what kind of punishment did angada receive for raping mandodhari(ravana's wife) ? Ravana threatened Sita to be his wife, but never did he commit those crimes without her consent! This story is about treta yug right?

@@nishikun867u seems to read it from some other adaptation than original Valmiki Ramayan version

@@ravitejalingadhalli6301 do u know what "folklore" mean? The so-called epic "Ramayana" was handed down orally first. The one written by Valmiki omitted many of the wrongdoing in order to promote hinduism same with Vyasa's Mahabharata..... It's all part of folklore.... All the variations are true...

Who told U this .....​@@nishikun867

I agree also duryodhava was meant to be king as his father was the eldest son and so what he

​@@the_roses6728No But Yuddhishtir Was elder Than Dhuryodhan

@@ambiliramachandran5739 his mother didn't gave birth to him, god gifted him to Kunti.. whereas Gandhari gave birth to Duryodhana herself ( also if were talking about the elder one, Karna he is the eldest)

@@the_roses6728 Everyone was literally unaware Of The Birth of Karna and If We are Talking about the real Paternity Lemme Say you something That Both Dhritharashtra and Pandu were Not Vichitraveeeya's Sons They were The sons Of Vedvyas...Then How Come Pandu and Dhritharashtra Have The right on Simhasan?

@@the_roses6728he is talking about his father. Basically had to give the throne to his younger brother because he was blind but it’s always that the oldest gets the throne so it is not clear if it was a temporary arrangement until Dhyrodhana grows up or permanent arrangement. So there is a genuine debate on who the kingdom goes to because of unusual circumstances.

In English it is called vali and Hindi people call it bali both are correct we have mentioned it in full video ♥️

If you read it properly all the wife’s of Krishna was either because of certain circumstances, boons and other 4 were Laxmi themselves and he respected all of them equally he even protected Draupadi who contradicted to your statement was having 5 husbands too

@@Oorjaofficial well Draupadi had a appropriate tale that she asked that she wants a man that is extremely strong , extremely beautiful etc etc but it was not possible to have all the traits she mentioned in one man so she got a little scammed by gods😂 and also when arjun bought her home to show her mother she was in sadhna then without opening her eyes she said whatever you bought share between your brother in that time period people really respected what elders said without a question so draupadi had to except all 5 of them as aagya of pandva's mother where as i agree many womens desired bhgwan vishnu and did sadhnas to ask boons to marry him but like laxmi ma he could have found a loophole and stay loyal to her only well whatever khna meri mummy ka sb bhgwan ki maya h😂

@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 So, you’re comparing ancient scriptures that have guided civilizations for millennia to a “depopulation agenda”? Really? Let’s not get carried away with half-baked theories wrapped in trendy skepticism. Ancient scriptures like the Mahābhārata aren’t just about stories; they carry deep philosophical insights, moral lessons, and the essence of Dharma, which have stood the test of time. Sure, questioning is important-that’s how we learn. But questioning doesn’t mean dismissing centuries of wisdom just because it doesn’t fit a modern-day cynical narrative. It’s one thing to critique, and another to outright reject profound teachings without fully understanding them. As for George Carlin’s quote, it's amusing in a stand-up routine, but let's not confuse comedy with theology. If you’re not impressed with the divine workings of the universe, maybe that’s more about your perspective than the actual design. You can question all you want, but dismissing the value of these texts without grasping their deeper meaning? Now that’s not impressive.

​@@jaydutta7711 sorry sir, one needs to question everything, even according to scriptures, that's is called research. god only knows how much those scriptures are corrupted by evil forces before reaching you, especially in this highly deceptive age. it is up to you, if you want to take everything by the face value. ultimately, rishis like buddha & other ancient sages gained & confirmed the knowledge only through "tapas" (meditation), which they documented for the less capable humans. anyways i can't say anything if you conclude that, people questioning as dismissal. please let me know what you advice a person bitten by a poisonous creature - to get anti-venom treatment in the clinic first or go to a "mantra" specialist first? regarding gorge carlin it's ok to have your own opinion, but logic is to finally grasping the meaning of a statement whether it's told in a comedy show or in a puranic movie. 😀

@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, really? I see you're quite the self-proclaimed expert on questioning and research, but let me enlighten you. In Sanatan Dharma, questioning God is perfectly fine for gaining knowledge, but passing judgment on Him? That's out of your league. No human is on par with God to judge His actions or intentions. Our scriptures, written by sage Vedavyasa, are safeguarded by divine protection and are not tainted by any 'evil forces.' They're authentic and reliable. And before you lecture me on 'tapas' and other sages, remember this: God’s messages aren’t up for debate or distortion by human opinions. They’re divine truths, untouched and uncorrupted. So, if you're bitten by a poisonous creature, would you consult a 'mantra' specialist or get actual medical treatment? Similarly, don’t mistake questioning for judging. Stick to questioning for knowledge, but don’t cross the line into unwarranted judgment. Your opinions might be amusing, but they don’t hold a candle to the divine wisdom of our scriptures. Cheers! 🥂

@@jaydutta7711 thanks for making me realise to not waste my time with your crappy opinions 😀. well, cheers to u too.

@@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Oh, is that the best comeback you've got? Because it sounds pretty weak and irrational. It's funny how you dismiss actual knowledge from the author of the Mahābhārata, who literally wrote the epic, while spouting off your own irrational, uninformed opinions. Before you try to sound clever next time, make sure you’re not just proving my point. Cheers to you too! 🥂 😉

Surely, He was a great knowledgeable king and devotee but it is also true that he was defeated by many people in his life, we do extensive research and always bring real stories please check there many people who have defeated him but not able to kill because no one was knowing the weakness which his brother later reveals