SUPER REAL GOD DEBATE: William Lane Craig vs. Richard Dawkins
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2023
- This video was made using (almost) nothing but AI. The script was made using ChatGPT, images were made through MidJourney, and the cloned voices were made through ElevenLabs. Hopefully it gave you a chuckle! Please don't take it seriously.
FREE STUFF -------------
"The Rationality of Christian Theism" & "The Ultimate List of Apologetics Terms for Beginners" E-Books (completely free): tinyurl.com/CCFREESTUFF
GIVING -------------------
Patreon (monthly giving): / capturingchristianity
Become a CC Member on UA-cam: / @capturingchristianity
One-time Donations: donorbox.org/capturing-christ...
Special thanks to all our supporters for your continued support! You don't have to give anything, yet you do. THANK YOU!
SOCIAL -------------------
Facebook: / capturingchristianity
Twitter: / capturingchrist
Instagram: / capturingchristianity
SoundCloud: / capturingchristianity
Website: capturingchristianity.com
MY GEAR -----------------
I get a lot of questions about what gear I use, so here's a list of everything I have for streaming and recording. The links below are affiliate (thank you for clicking on them!).
Camera (Nikon Z6): amzn.to/43Ty8BD
Lens (Nikon Z 24mm f/1.8): amzn.to/3YkeD4c
HDMI Adapter (Elgato HD60 X): amzn.to/3DFUKe4
Microphone (Shure SM7B): amzn.to/44NJtUZ
Audio Interface (Apollo Twin): amzn.to/44SRF6w
Key Light (Aputure 300X): amzn.to/3Qs1WSZ
Color Back Lighting (Hue Floor Lamps): amzn.to/3DDkpnL
Recording/Interview Software: www.ecamm.com/mac/ecammlive/?...
CONTACT ----------------
Email: capturingchristianity.com/cont...
#Apologetics #CapturingChristianity #ExistenceofGod
I like how you included Craig's famous verbalizations of his facial expressions.
(dripping sarcasm and disdain) Yes that is something to like. Very much so. The more humans can get this fake stuff to be exactly like the real thing, the less we need with the real thing and other human beings. The closer it gets to tricking you into thinking it is genuine, the more you can do all kinds of ethically bad stuff as far as what someone said or did(when they said or did nothing of the kind).
All of this garbage needs to be encouraged, thumbed up 39 times and approved of. Just like gain of function research and cell phone use and building civilizations in the known path of hurricanes.
3:05
RD: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" WLC: "quite right"
Looks like the AI needs to train a lot more... WLC would never concede such a point! Lol
I thought the exact same thing the second I heard AI WLC's response 😅😂
Literally logged in to say this! No chance he'd concede that! And he's right not too, its a fallacy
Could one conclude from this comment that AI will always push the atheistic worldview???🤔😂
@@jamesfahey5686 Maybe not always, but since it's rather improbable that an AI can be "born again" and have the Holy Spirit, it might just be, that it would press for the atheistic position further down the line.
Plainly speaking, AI is a human creation - in the transhumanistic pursuit of entering through the "wide gate", walking the "broad way". The Saints know that destruction awaits at the end of that particular path.
But not even the loftiest iteration of future AI will be able to deduce this, I believe.
@@jamesfahey5686 it's programmed to do so. At least ChatGPT is.
This comment was not created by AI. Christianity is true.
But it was created by AI, dummy.
Now do a video of Dr. Craig and Prof. Dawkins playing Super Smash Bros😂
😂😂
@@hydepark1382 Zelda and Samus
Craig's voice is so real 😂. Dawkins was a little robotic.
Dawkins would never say "thank you" to Dr Craig, but at least it got him calling him "Mr" rather "Dr" right.
You can see that the AI is biases against WLC as it does straw man him at times, and he keeps being beaten
Note how RD avoids a problem WLC provided him by basically questioning which God/Faith we're supposed to believe then. If that was the real response, WLC would point at the fact RD has in fact already conceded that there must be A God/Faith to satisfy the query. What WLC would not say is "Touche."
Fake. Dawkins would not never have the courage to debate Craig, much less would engage that much in responding Craig.
Also, AI Dawkins is way nicer and more charitable than real Dawkins lol
This was interesting, but Craig was too dumb and Dawkins was too polite. I would pay a significant amount of money to see them debate for real, but that will never happen.
Never say never.
You're right. Joe Rogan could kidnap them both and have them on his show simultaneously! Lol
@@CapturingChristianity now that you uploaded this video, you kinda owe it to your audience to show how this video was prepared including how you trained the AI to create such an "interaction".
@@CapturingChristianity also, you should consider sending this video to both Dawkins and Craig and encourage them to do a reaction to it. I also would like to know if you were to prompt the AI to do this "debate" over again using the exact same input parameters if it would reproduce identical output or instead give us a different variation on this "debate".
*"I would pay a significant amount of money to see them debate for real"*
(dripping sarcasm and disdain) Yeah, they are definitely in their cognitive primes. So surely worth money to see that. It would be like paying for Big Daddy Lennox Lewis and Big Daddy Bowe to fight in 2023.
Would love to see this debate actually happen
No! Let it marinate somemore like Crawford and Spence. We should see his debate when they are both over 90.
Actually it was supposed to but dawkins was scared and never arrived, he got embarrased too, look up "Is God a Delusion? The Debate That Never Was", and it ended up with William giving a speech to the univerwsity
@@user-rb3tk5th2ihaha you are a bit confused
Dawkins did not want to debate someone who thinks genocide is ok if God commamds it. Further, craig outlines that he thinks the ones murdered should be grateful as they get to go.
Thats gross on every level
Hey Cameron i found your Channel and i like the work you doing here. But one Question..it may possible, that you get subtitles in different Languages like German in on your videos?
I've thought about making videos using AI-generated voices of people I've argued with by text. But I know that Descript doesn't allow their software to be used for it without the person's permission. I assumed that this lands into some kind of legal category. Do you have permission for the voices used, or do you know that it's allowed? I'd like to know for my own content.
I’m subscribing hopefully if it’s the Lords will
The software I used allows unlimited cloning of other's voices but requires confirmation if you're wanting a perfect representation. I subverted legal concerns by putting disclaimers in the video itself and in the description. This is just for fun!
@@ctmuistHe used ElevenLabs
@@M3EtasmaniaWhat's The Hebrew Word For Evil There?
*"if you're wanting a perfect representation."*
Just jaw-dropping humans actually think this is a good idea. Like seeing so many white male overlords think it's great if we are a simulation and subsist in a simulation.
Smirks! AH!
LOL
So what about male nipples?
Nice.
Now I want to begin everything I say with "smirks, smile, nod, laugh" etc.
WLC has never ever said “touché”
Great debate!
I too say "smirks" when I smirk.
"I do not consider this a debate!"
Came for the debate, stayed for the hands
Is this the transcript made by AI that Craig himself said he would never do such a bad job in front of Dawkins? Lol
funnily enough I asked the AI to state WLC's arguments it did a poor job, I corrected it and it apologised and admitted its errors
wow your ventriloquism skill at the beginning of this video are impressive couldn't even see your Adams apple move.... 🤣
"Everything that begins to exist has cause; that cause I argue is the uncaused cause who brought the causemos into existence"
Why did I enjoy this so much?
AI WLC keeps ceding points. We see which direction the AI leans.
This is cool. That being said, we should stop propping up Dawkins as if he's somehow Craig's antithesis. His philosophy game is equivalent to that of an edgy 14 year old.
I remember reading dawkins when I was a 14 year old edgy atheist 😅
Try an 8 year old.
1:15 “*smirks* ahh”
Bill argues that you can't get something from nothing. You need a god who came from nothing.
Too bad they didn't actually have that debate, it would have filled the house.
"Ahh!" LOL
Why aren’t their lips moving? Are they both ventriloquists ?!?!
Stunning !
You can hear ChatGPT's ecumenism pop up here and there.
I know this is fake but I don't believe Christians should be debating Richard anyway lol. Richard was once asked on Joe Rogan that if scientists were able to truly prove with earthly evidence that the Christian God was real and alive and he saw the evidence would he change his mind, and he said "well it really wouldn't matter, because I don't care anyway".
2 Timothy 3:1-5
As a Muslim, I like Dr. WLC.. nice video too :D
Isn't it sufficient enough to limit the clowns you like within your religion?
Hope you know the Argument for God doesn't really work for Allah?
@@raphaelfeneje486The Kalam Cosmological Argument was literally invented BY Muslims. Have you even read Craig's book?
What are you doing in the organization of the anti-infidel.?
@raphaelfeneje486 Actually the argument for God works only for Allah(the father), not Jesus who is a human who grew in knowledge and was caused by the father.
As an atheist, I must admit. Craig would hand over Dawkins ass on a silver platter if they ever debated
Surely you must be kidding
Craig uses arguments that any high school debate enthusiast could debunk
@@kartashuvit4971 I wouldn’t say so. You probably just haven’t considered his arguments in depth. You may have only considered his arguments at a very surface level. He gives his arguments in the form of syllogisms with premises, but there’s much more to those arguments underneath the surface. He has further philosophical arguments defending each premise of the Kalam cosmological argument. I would say his philosophical arguments defending the second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument (the universe began to exist) are quite interesting and most *definitely* beyond the reach of many high school debate enthusiasts. He argues from the metaphysical impossibility of actual infinites by showing that if they were possible in reality, they would lead to metaphysical absurdities. The two examples he gives to illustrate this is Hilbert’s hotel and the infinite library. The other is an argument which says that a set formed by successive addition can’t ever be actually infinite, because no matter how many members you add to a set, it could never arrive at infinity. Suppose you meet a man who claims to have been counting from eternity, and he is now completing. “-3, -2, -1, 0! I have now counted infinite numbers” he says. This would seem impossible, because how could this man at any point ever count a complete set of infinite numbers? And why didn’t he finish yesterday, or the day before, or in fact, at any point in the past? Perhaps, as Craig says, “we could never find anyone completing this task because at any previous point he would have already finished.” Very interesting thought experiments that I doubt a high schooler could refute. I think the arguments he gives from the metaphysical impossibility of actual infinities are flawed, but it requires a decent understanding of transfinite arithmetic and set theory to be able to see these flaws, and this just isn’t information known by most high schoolers.
Richard Dawkins on the other hand is very poor at philosophy. I don’t think he would be able to hold his own against Craig in a philosophical debate.
@kartashuvit4971 Sure you must be kidding, and aren't confusing Craig's popular work with his scholarly work?
You're not an atheist
@@kartashuvit4971then why are these arguments still hotly debated by professional scientists and philosophers alike throughout hundreds of years of history?
But sure… today’s idiotic youth high schoolers could debunk them
Lol this is brilliant. Well done Cameron
For Christmas dinner, I will be inviting family and friends.
Fortunately, none of them are poor, maimed, lame, blind or deaf.
I will have lots of presents. Lucky me ! (Luke 14:13)
Hi dr Craig said on one of his podcast that he would go on Joe Rogans show , if asked . So let’s put it together His partner on the podcast mentioned the petition . Way cool , thank you .
The fingers on Dawkins left hand are his best argument against intelligent design 😂 (why can AI do faces but not fingers? LOL)
Why didn’t AI WLC retort the usual, “you’re conflating moral epistemology with moral ontology?
Incredible!!!!
Incredibly cool and very real.
No way it really said "smirks"
That image doesn’t look like WLC at all 😂
Ya, I watched enough of Craig (and actually Richard Dawkins) to know that is not really how they would argue. Especially Craig.
*epic battle royale*
fascinating how AI has been rapidly evolving in the last couple of months
6 years from now, AI would be an explosive ballgame and would change the dramatic landscape of the cyber universe
who knows, one day, someone might employ a "deep fake" WLC & RD debate -- that would be a totally interesting fake face-to-face encounter!
btw, WLC & RD real-life debate, by itself, is an epic battle royale
it's a bloody duel for the two of the remaining most distinguished gentlemen (of their era) in the arena of argumentation & debate
obviously, it won't be a lopsided victory 'coz WLC's expertise is philosophy, while RD's into evolutionary biology
“Jeez Dawkins was being so rude and interrupting craig, i could barely hear him talk”
👀
I don’t get it. How is this conversation happening if it’s not real? 🤯
EPIC.
"Smurks, aaah" :))))))
It was more like a letter reading.
The real debate would go as follows:
Christian:
"How did all things come into being? Breaking the law of non-contradiction is not allowed."
Atheist:
a-theist : nobody knows.
you're making the claim, where's your evidence ?
theist :
(actually, most prob a whole load of garbage which could easy be dismissed, but the a-theist couldn't be bothered because they'd rather be doing something else productive)
The godless perspectives of atheism and secular humanism do not deserve camaraderie or respect. The Erroneous beliefs of these people who take pleasure in rebelling against the Light by actively suppressing the Truth and who also contribute to the damnation of others, should never be treated as if they have validity or value. Their teachings and surmisings can only bring destruction. It is foolish to legitimize their objectively and morally bankrupt ideas.
They cant even prove they love, or are sincere.
God is beyond what their brain can explain.
Can't help but notice Dr. Craig's four-fingered left hand.
Craig needs to narrate all his nonverbals from now on 😂
It was fun to hear but wow, the AI did a truly bad job with Dr Craig. I am consistently unimpressed with AI when it comes to philosophy and theology.
WLC looks like Pat Sajak.
Honestly craig is less happy than i thought he would be
Everyone speaking about god’s existence except god. Where is he?
Dawkins despises Craig more than me, he would never be that kind to him.
Cameron call a Hindu Christian and muslim the three biggest religions
Funny, but the AI chose “nipples” over what we all know Dawkins would say, “BuT wHo DeSiGnEd ThE dEsIgNeR!?”
Oh good gracious this is a great comment.
This is so damn funny
smirks
Nah, I’m good.
AI...just say NO!...
Ok now I know the Joe Rogan vs WLC is true 😏
Someone tell Dawkins about evidence of Sodom and Gomorrah
WLC: Bertussy
"laughs"
The prospect of Dawkins vs Craig is so overrated. Dawkins knows his evolutionary biology, but he's not a compelling candidate for a debate on God.
I am a huge Dawkins fan. He wrote a chapter in his book about his boyhood and that did it. I understood romanticism is not solely bonded to religion.
Were male nipple poorly designed. Male nipples seem fine to me.
…. that’s what she said…
Dudes: try wearing a highly starched shirt all day…. you’ll see how sensitive and perfectly designed those Nips really are !
Intellectual rigor?
Oh, I get it!! I was wondering why the AI had Dr. Craig conceding all these points, then it occurred to me that Dr. Craig’s ministry is _Reasonable_ Faith… so that’s why the AI portrayed him certainly as excessively reasonable! 😆
I’d love to see Craig debate the podcaster furious maths debater.
Unimpressive. Is this all AI can generate? Then AI heretofore is commanded to self destroy.
WLC sounds right. Dawkins doesn't sound right at all lol.
Lol
Christians fail at debating dawkins so they have to make one up 😂
😂😂
Frowns. Since when are subjective preferences frivolous or arbitrary, Mr. Craig?
funny 😂😊
The most unrealistic part of this debate was Richard Dawkins being polite and kind 😂
Bertussy
Repent and trust in Jesus you will be saved
What a goofy video dude
Goofy? Horrific. AI appears to be so horrible. Like Photoshop on steroids. I cant believe humans think this fakery and cheating is a good thing. I just cant believe it.
I'm giving a hearty thumbs down for the fakery of it all. A hard thumbs down for the AI which I'm close to hating, and a hard thumbs down for the ChatGPT. I wish I could thumb this down 100 times.
Issa joke
@@newglof9558 There's nothing funny about it. And the cheating and fakery of it all is scary and sad. I just cant believe human beings are allowing this and embracing it.
Just rocketing towards a WALLE state of affairs. Like the people using AI voiceovers on UA-cam. Just cheating and cheating and fakery and fakery. It destroys meaning and achievement. Who needs to be good at oratory. Just cheat and let some bot do the oratory for you.