The Cavalry Archer name is different, the Rus one is Horse Archer. I do agree though, that Tamariots would have been both better for clarity with Cavalry and Horse being very similar, and it also sounds better imo
Idk about that great bombard, could have been a bunch of free janissaries instead of a weaker great bombard against a knight civ with no units to defend it. It managed to shoot twice at a stable and then died. I wonder what the thought process was behind that.
only real issue I see with going so heavy in melee/range cav focus is its a bit of anti synergy with the great bombard. The great bombard is slow as molasses which means if you want to protect it, you need to commit to the fight instead of utilizing your superior speed to kite and get better positioning. You can see Wam had to sac the great bombard which got almost no value because its more important to keep his cav archer mass alive by kiting. Of course, if the cav archers are OP enough then it doesnt really matter.
there is no "standard" cav archer in aoe4. Rus CAs get extra range ability, mangudai gets to fire while moving, khan hunters get range boost aura, Japanese CA get bonus anti-heavy dmg, and now ottoman CAs fire 2 shots per volley
I would never think that the ottoman Turkish civ would have a main horse archer unit, usually when I think of horse archers its always either Turkic Asians or Mongols that utilize that to its most potential.
It’s most likely a Tartar Horse Archer (Like you said Turkic asians) in Aoe3 the Ottomans had Cav archers and there was a unique native horse archer unit that was specifically Tartar in origin. Considering Byzantine have Hui Hui it’s not too much of a stretch.
They’re both conq iii. You’re confusing matchmaking rating and elo. They are similar matchmaking rating. Prolly just had 5 bad placement matches in the new season launch. Lots of people still play I don’t have any trouble with waiting time.
Kazakhstan has 3 main problems. Social, economic...and Drongo.
The Cavalry Archer name is different, the Rus one is Horse Archer. I do agree though, that Tamariots would have been both better for clarity with Cavalry and Horse being very similar, and it also sounds better imo
welcome back aoe4 year 1 Rus horse archer spam
Idk about that great bombard, could have been a bunch of free janissaries instead of a weaker great bombard against a knight civ with no units to defend it. It managed to shoot twice at a stable and then died. I wonder what the thought process was behind that.
If its unique from the Russian one it should have a unique name. The other option would be renamed Rus CA to Kipchaks
only real issue I see with going so heavy in melee/range cav focus is its a bit of anti synergy with the great bombard. The great bombard is slow as molasses which means if you want to protect it, you need to commit to the fight instead of utilizing your superior speed to kite and get better positioning. You can see Wam had to sac the great bombard which got almost no value because its more important to keep his cav archer mass alive by kiting. Of course, if the cav archers are OP enough then it doesnt really matter.
So what's the counter to cav archers
Two years later, Great Bombard still as useless as ever! Unless you got 6-7 of them which never happens in competitive
good siege should never be that strong
its a weaker version with the vizier point if you pop before imperial
I really missed the ottoman haters in the comments.
You used to be a whole army whenever there was an ottoman cast.
What happened?
Looks like the Turkish nationalist with 20 accounts is back to complain about Ottomans not being S tier OP
Ya boi is back! Hahaha boost mighty Ottoman plez randomname1402 we missed you
there is no "standard" cav archer in aoe4. Rus CAs get extra range ability, mangudai gets to fire while moving, khan hunters get range boost aura, Japanese CA get bonus anti-heavy dmg, and now ottoman CAs fire 2 shots per volley
This game is glitched RN. Failing to Notify about attacks at the moment.
being this way since the release =(
"One shot, one kill" is from the 1993 movie "Sniper" staring Tom Berenger 🙂
Archers in warcaft 3 also reference this
did they nerf the springwald? seems to do a lot less damage to siege now.
Yes they reworked it to be an anti melee infantry unit
no anti-siege siege units anymore
WE'RE RENAMING CONSTANTINOPLE WITH THIS ONE
Fancy seeing you here.
Can you say nerf? lol
I would never think that the ottoman Turkish civ would have a main horse archer unit, usually when I think of horse archers its always either Turkic Asians or Mongols that utilize that to its most potential.
It’s most likely a Tartar Horse Archer (Like you said Turkic asians) in Aoe3 the Ottomans had Cav archers and there was a unique native horse archer unit that was specifically Tartar in origin. Considering Byzantine have Hui Hui it’s not too much of a stretch.
Conq3 vs plat 3… yeah not many people playing this game huh?
They’re both conq iii. You’re confusing matchmaking rating and elo. They are similar matchmaking rating. Prolly just had 5 bad placement matches in the new season launch. Lots of people still play I don’t have any trouble with waiting time.