well guess what. I love my isi sand wedge and lob wedge Be Cu. They are very confident looking and still perform really well. your thoughts on that. I use G25 irons. the lofts are higher than the newer clubs / getting the lofts stronger which I believe is not needed. decent angle should be high to get that ball to stop quickly. Ping made a tremendous move to offer retro lofts which basically over half golfers need. correct? very good review! Cheers
Really good to see a review with all the (odd) irons in a set. Means so much more than just hitting a 7 iron. Sometimes with these reviews I think it would help to have the previous model for a comparison on numbers (particularly with drivers) and for the looks when a brand says that they’ve changed this and that. Also it will be useful to say where an iron is supposed to fit in a line up. Ping’s “max” irons are the g730s aren’t they? Is there a g740 on the way? Seems like these irons fit a gap between those and the i530s.
I recently gave up my Ping G15s for Mizuno JPX925 HL. Love my new clubs. Didn't continue ping because none of the new models could match the feel of my G15s. The Mizunos feel great and gained about 9 yards distance with each club.
What shaft? I fancy the forgiveness of the jpx925 as well. PS: I would expect that kind of distance gain by the way with the lofts being 3 (?) degrees stronger compared to a G15. I had the same loft effect when I changed from Mizuno MX300 to my current Ping i525s
@@pbode1 I am 67 so I went with the MMT 55 senior flex shaft with lamkin sonar grips. I am tall , went with the max 2 degree up lie. Feel great! Hit shots out on the toe and still got good distance. Actually the longer clubs are only 1 degree stronger than the G15s.
@ Cool. Nice win of yardages then! I just switched from regular steel to regular graphite at 55. I'm tall as well at 6'6". fitter got me another 0.5 inch longer to 1.5 and 3 degrees upright :-) which poses a lot less strain on my back as well. grip going from slim to medium. Quite a change, my first round with them was positively awful, but mastered them after a few weeks.
Looks-wise on the back for sure a step up from g430. Good of you to test the short irons for short game/bunker. If Ping is targeting a lower handicap demography now with the g4 series, these need to be able to do more than just getting the ball anywhere on the green. Had the same issue after I was fitted into the i525 in 2023 - coming from the Mizuno MX series, I was used to hit far more delicate short game shots - could not do that with the new PW, so got myself an extra PW (from Mizuno, to compensate for my betrayal after 20 years of playing their irons!) to avoid rocketing the ball all across the green with these hot faces.
I would say a lot of high handicappers tend to hit more on the toe. That extra little bit of length will in effect move the contact closer to the middle of the face.
I would love to see you hit older irons like G20 G25 G30 vs these G440s and see the numbers. I bet. decent angle/ stopping power/ spin is better on the older pings. This is very important and more important than distance to the average player. the ball is going to run out off the green if you do not have the height. correct?
Alex, the Ping Eye 2 SW is a square-faced sandwedge. You hit it straight on to the target. It doesn’t work with you opening the club face. That’s just not how that club works.
Feed back ? Never yet hit a club that I could not determine where I hit it. Perhaps some not as clearly as others , sure. But never had to guess where on the face I hit it.
I always laugh when reviewers comment about the offset. Compare this to the Ping irons of the 90s which had a half inch of offset, and you'll conclude the offset of the G440 is more similar to a blade of not too long ago.
100% about the wedges in almost every set ever made. No feel. Those lofts are all still pretty strong. My Miura wedge is at 47 degrees. Yikes What about using their wedges around the green and see wha the few is like?
Sorry mate I think you need to look at the spec’s and length of other manufacturers TaylorMade, Cobra and Callaway before you “worry about the length of the 6,5 and 4irons of the Ping 440.
Moe Norman used to modify his clubs himself with an angle iron and a welding machine and the lead he added to them he left exposed he was the top golfer in Canada for 8 years so enough about what the damn clubs look like. A pro only cares how they perform or they'll be picking golf balls up at a driving range. Be careful what you wish for. Spare us the rhetoric please.
Best golfer in Canada eh? That's like being the top golfer in the 51st state 😂. Go make your own youtube club review channel and hopefully spare us your inane comments.
STOP! Anyone doing a review about distance must always start with....... yes, WHAT IS THE STATIC LOFT on the #7i!!! At 92mph, the carry should be between 175 ~185 yrds with a 34 Loft but with a 28 deg (1.5 club stronger), anyone can easily get 200 Carry even with lesser speed!
well guess what. I love my isi sand wedge and lob wedge Be Cu. They are very confident looking and still perform really well. your thoughts on that. I use G25 irons. the lofts are higher than the newer clubs / getting the lofts stronger which I believe is not needed. decent angle should be high to get that ball to stop quickly. Ping made a tremendous move to offer retro lofts which basically over half golfers need. correct?
very good review! Cheers
Really good to see a review with all the (odd) irons in a set. Means so much more than just hitting a 7 iron.
Sometimes with these reviews I think it would help to have the previous model for a comparison on numbers (particularly with drivers) and for the looks when a brand says that they’ve changed this and that.
Also it will be useful to say where an iron is supposed to fit in a line up. Ping’s “max” irons are the g730s aren’t they? Is there a g740 on the way? Seems like these irons fit a gap between those and the i530s.
I don't think anyone would notice their shafts being 3mm longer. Not even a tour pro! Decent review of superb-looking irons, so well done.
Really good review on these new pings. And insightful comments from folks below. Learning a lot
I recently gave up my Ping G15s for Mizuno JPX925 HL. Love my new clubs. Didn't continue ping because none of the new models could match the feel of my G15s. The Mizunos feel great and gained about 9 yards distance with each club.
What shaft? I fancy the forgiveness of the jpx925 as well. PS: I would expect that kind of distance gain by the way with the lofts being 3 (?) degrees stronger compared to a G15. I had the same loft effect when I changed from Mizuno MX300 to my current Ping i525s
@@pbode1 I am 67 so I went with the MMT 55 senior flex shaft with lamkin sonar grips. I am tall , went with the max 2 degree up lie. Feel great! Hit shots out on the toe and still got good distance. Actually the longer clubs are only 1 degree stronger than the G15s.
@ Cool. Nice win of yardages then! I just switched from regular steel to regular graphite at 55. I'm tall as well at 6'6". fitter got me another 0.5 inch longer to 1.5 and 3 degrees upright :-) which poses a lot less strain on my back as well. grip going from slim to medium. Quite a change, my first round with them was positively awful, but mastered them after a few weeks.
nice story
1.5 in long seems very long as a current fitter but if you hit it well all that matters.
Looks-wise on the back for sure a step up from g430. Good of you to test the short irons for short game/bunker. If Ping is targeting a lower handicap demography now with the g4 series, these need to be able to do more than just getting the ball anywhere on the green. Had the same issue after I was fitted into the i525 in 2023 - coming from the Mizuno MX series, I was used to hit far more delicate short game shots - could not do that with the new PW, so got myself an extra PW (from Mizuno, to compensate for my betrayal after 20 years of playing their irons!) to avoid rocketing the ball all across the green with these hot faces.
G series are suitable for high single figures handicap to high
I would say a lot of high handicappers tend to hit more on the toe. That extra little bit of length will in effect move the contact closer to the middle of the face.
Great point !
not sure weather i like the chrome look but they certainly preformed well
I love the numbers on the face as well 👍🏻
Old school Ping!
For sure I think a great move
Never a better time to buy clubs. Pings look great but a lot of other great ones out there too. Thanks for your review.
I would love to see you hit older irons like G20 G25 G30 vs these G440s and see the numbers. I bet. decent angle/ stopping power/ spin is better on the older pings. This is very important and more important than distance to the average player. the ball is going to run out off the green if you do not have the height. correct?
Alex, the Ping Eye 2 SW is a square-faced sandwedge. You hit it straight on to the target. It doesn’t work with you opening the club face. That’s just not how that club works.
Feed back ? Never yet hit a club that I could not determine where I hit it. Perhaps some not as clearly as others , sure. But never had to guess where on the face I hit it.
I’ll stick with my Srixon ZX4 MKII thanks 👍Although Ping are a fantastic brand.
I always laugh when reviewers comment about the offset. Compare this to the Ping irons of the 90s which had a half inch of offset, and you'll conclude the offset of the G440 is more similar to a blade of not too long ago.
I just bought the g430s a month ago
100% about the wedges in almost every set ever made. No feel. Those lofts are all still pretty strong. My Miura wedge is at 47 degrees. Yikes
What about using their wedges around the green and see wha the few is like?
i think pings best looking game improvement irons were the G400s.
Too good for my game. I’m in the 90’s-100.
Or buy the new PXG Black Ops irons & save a little money. 💰
Sorry mate I think you need to look at the spec’s and length of other manufacturers TaylorMade, Cobra and Callaway before you “worry about the length of the 6,5 and 4irons of the Ping 440.
This is all in relation to past long products
I went with the retro in my G430 irons much easier to launch.
I dont understand why they would want to make a GI iron smaller? I want confidence when I’m over the ball - not a smaller face to hit
These look bigger than the g430’s. Is that correct ? Will these make the g730’s redundant ? Look more Cobra than Ping for me.
Same thought I had. Seen other reviews as well.. with this much emphasis on distance these g440 creep too close to the g730 battering rams.
@ seems that way, separation was better with the g430's
Moe Norman used to modify his clubs himself with an angle iron and a welding machine and the lead he added to them he left exposed he was the top golfer in Canada for 8 years so enough about what the damn clubs look like. A pro only cares how they perform or they'll be picking golf balls up at a driving range. Be careful what you wish for. Spare us the rhetoric please.
Best golfer in Canada eh? That's like being the top golfer in the 51st state 😂. Go make your own youtube club review channel and hopefully spare us your inane comments.
Are you joking?
No way in hell I would get ping over my mizuno’s.
I think for most people these could be great!! What Mizuno are you thinking?
@ I use the 925’s and I would agree that a lot of golfers would benefit from using them.
Your comment on shaft length also holds true for your driver....
I would! I’ve tried Mizuno and not for me!
@ I love my mizuno’s
The Srixon ZXi4 look better than these as a game improvement iron - and are significantly cheaper
Why will you not respond to me?
Hi! Sorry juggling a lot at the minute i will respond in due course 🙌🏼
PING stands for Pretty. Interestingly. Not. Good.
STOP! Anyone doing a review about distance must always start with....... yes, WHAT IS THE STATIC LOFT on the #7i!!! At 92mph, the carry should be between 175 ~185 yrds with a 34 Loft but with a 28 deg (1.5 club stronger), anyone can easily get 200 Carry even with lesser speed!