Storm Over Asia / The Heir to Genghis Khan (1928) movie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- In 1918 a simple Mongolian herdsman escapes to the hills after brawling with a western capitalist fur trader who cheats him. In 1920 he helps the partisans fight for the Soviets against the occupying army. However he is captured when the army tries to requisition cattle from the herdsmen at the same time as the commandant meets with the reincarnated Grand Lama. After being shot, the army discovers an amulet that suggests he was a direct descendant of Genghis Khan. They find him still alive, so the army restores his health and plans to use him as the head of a Mongolian puppet regime.
Storm Over Asia / The Heir to Genghis Khan (1928) movie
Genres: Drama, War
Production Co: Mezhrabpomfilm
Directed by Vsevolod Pudovkin
Writing Credits: Osip Brik, I. Novokshenov (story)
Cinematography by Anatoli Golovnya
Cast:
Valéry Inkijinoff as Bair, the Mongol
I. Dedintsev as The British Commandant
Aleksandr Chistyakov as The Russian Rebel Leader
Viktor Tsoppi as Henry Hughes, unscrupulous fur-buyer
Fyodor Ivanov as The Lama
V. Pro as British missionary, translates amulet
Boris Barnet as English soldier, pipe smoker
Karl Gurnyak as English soldier
Bilinskaya as The Commandant's Wife
I. Inkizhinov as Bair's Father
Anel Sudakevich as Commandant's blonde daughter
Leonid Obolensky as Commandant's adjutant with moustache
Another (visual) masterpiece of pure cinema from the unforgettable Era of the silent movies. ''Once upon a Time in the East.''
Judging by their dress, these are Buryats, a group of Mongol peoples. I think the movie has been filmed in Russia where they have a minority people - Buryats in Eastern Siberia.
Thank you for sharing.
It is missing the last frame saying DEATH TO IMPERIALISM! from the original ^^
Always
ALways
ALWAYS
The best and most important last frame is cut out! Burns my arse, too.
The music is fantastic in this!
The final sequence was superb.
Œuvre cinématographique à grand déploiement......
Невероятно и впечатляюще
Sensacional!!!!!! Excelente filme produzido há quase 90 anos... demonstrando que a genialidade no cinema remonta a sua criação!!!!!!
The early Russian documentary-style movie is about the Mongol people of Russia and how the Russian imperialism came to subjugate its proud descendants of Genghiz Khan. This Russian imperialism worked not so very differently from Spanish and Portuguese colonisation of most parts of Latin America and parts of Africa and East Indies, British colonialism in different parts of the world, American subjugation of its proud natives and Chinese imperialism on its Tibetan, Uighur and Mongol neighbours. The movie however shows a happy end to the Mongol subjugation by the fiction of a descendant of Genghiz Khan reclaiming his rule, which however has happened only after Gorbachev's Perestroika when most of Russia's Asian republics declared themselves free from Russian rule, most of the colonies of Britain broke away to declare themselves independent and this is yet to happen in Tibet and Xingiang against Chinese rule. Pudovkin's masterpiece has captured the poignancy, patience, faith, loyalty and courage of the Mongols set in the backdrop of the vast and wildly beautiful Steppes of Eurasia. A Russian movie memorable for its sympathetic view of its own ill-treated Asiatic minorities. The movie's photography is beautiful in its documentary style. Hats off to all those who have contributed their share in the making of this epic movie of the silent era.
You have written well about the film. But there is one inaccuracy in your words:
Vsevolod Pudovkin made a film not about Russian, but about English imperialism.
1920 British troops occupy Mongolia. An ancient charter falls into the hands of a poor hunter, testifying that its owner is a descendant of the great conqueror Genghis Khan. The British declare him a prince, hoping to use him as a puppet in a political game.
1:16:40 - 1:23:37
"Jenghis Khan" LOL
😍👍
Р Е Ж И С С Е Р
Р Г А Н Ч Р К Н Д
Ч Н Г А О
Я О ГЕ ШТГ Я
МУЗЫКА КОАИЛ ДВЕВ ЖВА
ЖВА
ЖВАА ВДАВ ВСРПВЫ ГАЫПОЧА
Б ЮЧАЧЯАМ ЖСРП
ДП
ХВСАЧ ЖЧСПСМОЧ
ЖЧСП ЧДЧЧ ДЧМРС
КОНЕЦ
The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians:
First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
About the true faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): "It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)."
Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu...
So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Mostly true but a lot of fake, Ih Mongol it’s united tribes, language they spoke it was a Mongolian, most of tribes had quite similar dialects! Mongolian writing and seal provided a lot!
@@Bator81 ...and they had nothing to do with the medieval Tatars, the native nation of Chinghiz Khan
Фильму скоро 100 лет будет. Так он документальный или художественный? Эмоции актеров зашкаливают.
nul...