October (Ten Days that Shook the World) (1928) movie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 гру 2016
- In documentary style, events in Petrograd are re-enacted from the end of the monarchy in February of 1917 to the end of the provisional government and the decrees of peace and of land in November of that year. Lenin returns in April. In July, counter-revolutionaries put down a spontaneous revolt, and Lenin's arrest is ordered. By late October, the Bolsheviks are ready to strike: ten days will shake the world. While the Mensheviks vacillate, an advance guard infiltrates the palace. Anatov-Oveyenko leads the attack and declares the proclamation dissolving the provisional government.
October (Ten Days that Shook the World) (1928) movie
Genres: Drama, History, Silent film
Production Co: Sovkino
Directed by Grigori Aleksandrov, Sergei M. Eisenstein
Writing Credits: Sergei M. Eisenstein, Grigori Aleksandrov, Boris Agapow (intertitles), John Reed (book)
Music by Edmund Meisel, Dmitri Shostakovich
Cinematography by Eduard Tisse
Cast:
Nikolay Popov as Kerenskiy
Vasili Nikandrov as V.I. Lenin
Layaschenko as Konovalov
Chibisov as Skobolev
Boris Livanov as Terestsenko
Mikholyev as Kishkin
Nikolai Podvoisky as Bolshevik
Smelsky as Verderevsky
Eduard Tisse as German Soldier - Фільми й анімація
There's something ironic about a soviet film about the revolution being interrupted by ads
I blocked it with a blocker so I watched it without them, I am the real Bolshevik here and you're a simple Menshevik :D
@@e.alegre7765 what app?
@@doncorleone5677 ad block plus for firefox works. and it's free..
@@lastpirateslife or vanced.app for android
well considering this is a state sponsored advert for the revolution of the soviets , much needed in the day, as much entertaining as the modern approach too historical events ,: I:E band of brothers , Combat the tee vee show of the 1960s. Sharp a fictional account of the napoleonic war in europe of the 19th century . what is great about october is this was movie making in the beginning . a classic teaching device . silent films exposition was imagery , the horse on the bridge the woman with fine clothes , the cossacks at the railway . kerensky entering the people's house *(DUMA) via doorways into corridors of power .
This movie is a masterpiece on several levels. The musical score by Dimitri Shostakovich is brilliant and makes an already compelling film even more so. It was made at the original locations in Petrograd, which were still the same in 1927 as they were in 1917. October is the best movie about the crucial events of 1917. It is well worth watching and rewatching.
If the movie is made in 1927, the original score can not be of Shostakovich, who was then only 21 years old and who had released just two symphonies then. Some parts heard in the movie are from his later production. Another striking thing is appearance of Trotsky: I suspect that those parts were for a long period censured by Stalin. Fortunately he is here too and so at least the video seems to be the original version.
@@texwiller4029 The movie is from 1928. The Shostakovich soundtrack and the sound effects were added on later, some time in the 1930s, I believe.
@@SkremoMcThrftsto From what I know, the Shostakovich soundtrack was added in the 60's, when the movie was re-released for the commemoration of the 50 years of the revolution and the 40 years of the movie. The music tracks itself are largely taken from Shostakovich's Symphony No. 5, 11, and 12 (11 and 12 be those with the most significant portions).
@@texwiller4029 the original soundtrack was by Edmund Meisel who wrote the score to match the happenings on screen, but of course at that time it was hard to synchronize those things, so by the end of the movie sometimes sound and picture would be several seconds off. Plus Edmund and Sergei had a lot of different ideas so eventually Edmund's score was removed from the official version. Only seen again in ~2011 at the Berlin Film Festival
It is TOTAL PROPAGANDA CRAP
A movie in the public domain for mankind to see the possibilities of man and what is achievable of us to live in peace and harmony :)
Eisenstein was a genius film director who could pull you into the screen and move you to feel like you're there among the revolutionaries storming the palace and taking part in the streets listening to Lenin addressing the crowd. Very moving!
It's kind of preachy and heavy-handed, though. Leni Riefenstahl was pretty amazing too and could keep a certain distance and abstraction about it.
Reticuli Eh, not to the extent of Eisenstein. I think a lot more punch is added to his sequences considering the fact he was making propaganda to indoctrinate a country with a large illiterate peasant population. Riefenstahl focuses more on praise and spectacle than any real message behind a cut. It’s probably easier to feel the weight if you’re sympathetic ti the nazi ideals I guess
Very moving indeed...In the poor and starving Russia of the mid 1920s - the oppressive Communist regime in Russia found the resources necessary to produce this classic piece of propaganda! At least Nazi funded and produced 1930s "Triumph of The Will" was done at a time when Germany was doing quite well in regards to living conditions and employment.
@@Ronbo1948poor and starving Russia attacked from all sides by anti revolutionary forces from the capitalist world and from within. It didn't end there, it was followed by a devastating invasion from Nazi Germany. Never the less, they managed to build a world power that made took the nation from a poor agrarian country to an email industrial world power. Too bad the gains were lost to the feeble minded leadership after the war that brought capitalism back under Kruschav. But that's a history that those who aren't fooled by capitalist propaganda understand. Revolution is often a step forward and two steps backwards, until the world is ready that is.
Lenin entered Russia with billions of dollars worth of gold from Wall street bankers, the revolution was funded by capitalists.
The phrase "long live the provisional government" is kind of ironic
I suppose they wanted the provisional government to linger a bit
The phrase is ironic. When the phrase appears the people celebrating the provisional government are all high class citizens and officials (even the orthodox church is shown celebrating it)... That's the whole point it is making.... The provisional government is the government of the ruling class
a master piece of work in world film history
this is HOGWASH
@@heylo6791 - Like "Red Dawn" and other ANTI-COMMUNIST propaganda hogwash movies? Get real, will ya?
I know you are supposed to appreciate art in it's original form but I cannot watch this film without that incredible score. This is some of the best music produced in the 20th century.
That score plus those images are epic. Everybody involved was a genius.
Finally sat down and watched it last night! The way they built suspense was so incredible. Loved the score because it kept the rhythm going for me. I honestly don't think I would have watched it in one go if it didnt have the score. The added sound FX were pretty amazing and really helped the immersion. The multiple camera angles to fully cover scenes is so close to modern its pretty nuts. I'm no expert so I don't know how common this style of coverage was but I do know Eisenstein is the montage man. Great Quality AV! Thanks for the English!
It was very revolutionary for its time
A film that begins with petty, vengeful violence against a Tsar's statue, and ends with a mad mob smashing up Peter the Great's palace. Very prophetic.
Lenin's merry men sign decrees on land, bread and peace. But the 'Petrograd Proletariat' did not get too much of the first two over the next 20 years, and 'peace'- bought by doing a deal with Hitler- would be canceled by the worst war ever endured by Russia. Those exultant workers and peasants would die like dogs.
At least 'October's three main architects escaped death in combat or by starvation, purging, gulags or a bullet in the skull.
Podvoisky became the USSR's guru of physical fitness, an advocate of nudism. He prudently retired before Stalin's Great Terror got into top gear. Eisenstein spent years in the wilderness, most of his film proposals blocked bc he was suspected of 'formalism' and foreign contacts. Grisha Alexandrov fared best, producing the kind of movie Stalin liked: jolly musicals starring Alexandrov's wife.
I like the way the clapping and foot stomping sounds come in towards the end. Incredible film.
Thanks for posting. October 16, 1927.
When I saw the horse hanging from the bridge I thought of Picasso's painting Guernerca. I wonder if Picasso had seen this classic film.
Good observation! Picasso had many socialist sympathies so you may be right.
@@blackhope Picasso was a socialist, not just a sympathizer.
Love how in this movie Lenin comes all the way from Europe and _immediately_ starts giving speeches
أنا بأعتبر المخرج الروسي > مخرج هذا الفيلم أعظم مخرج في تاريخ السينما > لن يعوض
How very much true, tks
The guy they got to play Kerensky really looks like Kerensky
Also every 60 seconds a minute passes.
jhon reed wrote a book named ten days that shook the world
43:03
love that part, and the visuals seem to be so much before its time
Man that intro music hits hard
Great film. Was actually taken from John Reeds book of the same name. Reed was an American socialist and reporter who died in Russia shortly after the Civil War ended and is buried at the walls of the Kremlin alongside other heroes of the revolution. Lenin himself wrote a short forward to the book.
Jack Reed was an American traitor from Portland, Oregon on the run from federal authorities with a warrant for Sedition he committed during the First World War. Reed was to die a dog's death in Moscow in 1919 - a victim of socialist medicine.
@kɒmiː Fuck off, Commie! There was an Allied blockade of Russia after Red October because the Bolsheviks came to power because they sold out to the German Empire. Yes, Lenin was funded by the Kaiser of Germany - who shipped him back into the country via a sealed train in the middle of WW I in order to spread civil war in the country. The Bolsheviks were traitors to Russia - and pulled out the alliance with the West when they took over the government - the stalwart Allies who kept up their part of the agreement by shipping Russia money, war material, clothing and food. Thus the Bolsheviks were mad dogs who sold out the Allied war effort just like they sold out the Russian people.
@@Ronbo1948 bro ..what an historical Imagination
Incredible!!! I can not imagine the big investigation from Eisenstein for this movie. You can see every group of people fighting for the power!
All the peoples involved (including Sergey Eisenstein) had witnessed the real event 10 years prior! They just needed to remember.
Superb movie use full for history students
12 minutes in. This film is genius! Soooo ahead of its time.
Absolutely brilliant film with an matchless score. Should be shown to all budding revolutionaries.
And anyone wishing to learn from the disaster inflicted on Russia by Communism... That too.
@@Musicienne-DAB1995 Communism never happened in Russia, nor the entire Soviet Union. Do not speak so flippantly about things you clearly do not understand
@@MatauReviews Can you elaborate?
@@LAGoff Communism is stateless. Russia was a state
@@MatauReviews Does only one state count? Like a one world government? Or is that considered a state?
A masterpiece in the film history
Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
Anybody know the name of the music track at the beginning? It's a great score.
Shostakovich symphony no.12 also called October 1917
Personally, I am quite fascinated by the Great October Socialist Revolution of 1917 in Russia. It was the turning point in the country's history. I am also intrigued by the movie, "October," that showed such an event.
@merch marine - What the fuck is your problem? Just because I was expressing an opinion doesn't make me a "Communist," you fucking right-wing numbnuts! YOU need to grow up or get a life!
@merch marine - Are you high on drugs or something? Whatever it is, you need to grow up!
@Black Moon - What do you mean by that? I think your comment just doesn't prove anything. The 1917 Revolution was meant to overthrow the old, decayed and corrupt society to make way for a new kind of society. Even though the fallout of the October Revolution turned out not so well, the blame can be directed at the likes of Joseph Stalin, who was a VERY BAD leader that had perverted the ideas of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Vladimir Lenin, in order to build socialism in the WRONG direction. In other words, Stalin had given Communism a BAD NAME.
this is the funniest argument on youtube
@merch marine fuckface - GO FUCK YOURSELF and THEN GO CHOKE ON YOUR OWN VOMIT!
27:31 sounds a little like midnight by logic
Lindo!!! Simplesmente incrível
Good thing I just watched the history of this whole era of Russia couple months back. The entire movie actually made sense all the way through.
I remember watching this for the first time and being so confused throughout. I rewatched after learning about the Russian Revolution in school, and wow this is just fantastic!
So good
Good silent movie.
Anyone know where the hell I can find the version of this that's narrated by Orson Welles please? Been looking for a while now.
any luck?
I think you can find it here:
www.christiebooks.com/player/anarchy.html
@@philipparker5291 wow thanks a bunch. lots of stuff here!
ua-cam.com/video/J2jD94IAa6Y/v-deo.html
Awesome!!!
Dank, what a classic movie is
Who's idea was it to add foley sound effects to this originally silent movie?
what a masterful direction......speechless!
You can't be serious
Why not? It's a silent movie after all...
This movie was amazing and wonderful to watch by knowing the year it was produced
speechless. ha ha ha
Music of Shostakovich... did he edit a symphonic poem of this 90 minute movie, symphony no. 2?
He used the music of this film for his Symphony No. 12.
Song Magnific is perfect composer Dmitri Shostakovich
masterpiece...
Another 10 days required.
First time watching this movie. Love it, but DANG. I was not expecting it to be long lol
Try watching Napoléan (Abel Gance, 1927) as I did in Oakland’s Paramount Theatre on three screens for 330 minutes, involving the projections from 3 separate projectors in literally true widescreen
@@juanvargas9 no
Note that the title cards for the film incorrectly uses "it's" when "its" was correct;, a very common error in English orthography.
i would love to see old movies like this with sound and colour
"A little light on dialog." - Roger Ebert 4/10 /s
Who is watching dis movie in October 2020.... 🤔
I be watching it bro
15:10 Starts!
😁
Starts at 00:00
New people need to know the plot and history of the movie.
@@pawelparashar that is protesting start
holy shit, this feels like an actual footage of events
Does anyone know if this film is still in copyright?
Eisenstein's film 'October' is in the the public domain and so is not 'protected' by copyright law.
Taunton TUSC allcangogo
To JRGJRG,
Am I correct (I think I am) but USA copyright law requires the material/product to be registered, for that law to apply? Also expired copyright can be recopyrighted? So there is no security with a 70 year rule. Big companies from the 1930s still pursue copyright infringments as they may have renewed their copyright. As I found out uploading a late 1930s Bogart movie which I thought was past it's copyright date. But I was running a bit of a test upload so also e-mailed a request to Universal Studios who quicky replied telling me a court fee of about $80,000 dollars if I continued and they went to court. So I removed the upload from the public domain quickly and there for was okay. Apart from 2 strikes from UA-cam (now exstinct).
invasion at 1:30:50
4:05
Fitting for Whack Your Boss, the song I mean.
In my yt it says under the title: no adult content. Well, it's not for kids either!!
Welcome to Public Domain (in the US), October!
the masses saw themself - understand themself for the first time in history... eisensteins cut is to nervous - almost hysteric...
but the music is overwhelming... grands dieux...
Noice 🔥
Under capitalism, you get Marvel movies. Under communism, you get kino. Simple as.
Why in old movies everything is like it is in fast forward?
I think they have one frame less in a second than modern movies. The technology was still developing.
Because the camera is capturing this by 18 frames per second (fps; I think) . The more the frames, the slower it seems. Human eye perceives 24 fps.
Because of money. Early movie cameras were handcranked and film was expensive, so they cranked as slowly as they could get away with (at 12-14 frames per second). Cinema projectors were also handcranked, and they cranked as fast as they could get away with (at something like 18-20 frames per second), so they could show the movie more times and sell more tickets. People then got used to it and if became the norm. When the talkies (the non-silent movies) came, this trick didn't work anymore, so the standard of 24 frames per second was adopted.
ருஷ்ய புரட்சியாளர்களுக்கு தமிழர்களின் செவ்வணக்கம்...
inmortal jhon read no informo sobre los soviets en est emisferio
Slava RSDLP(B), Slava Lenin!
Lenin was not even a proletarian.
I was not prepared for just how hallucinatory this movie is. Cool.
Down with the Bourgeoisie!
👍
Damn what a movie
57:15
Just checking in to see if we're still allowed to watch Russian cinema on youtube.
0:13’. Mm. For a Soviet, maybe. Alright, I’m willing to keep an open mind. I am watching YOU!!!!
14:11
Tragico ! Mataram o cavalo branco ... Não tem efeito especial , mataram mesmo ...
Que cavalo ?
Sanskrit visualises
mute the sound and listen to this: ua-cam.com/video/XMkEEKvdI9U/v-deo.html
lal selam
Unfortunately, this is only a version mutilated by the Stalinist censorship, too. Designed for the 10th anniversary of the revolution, in November 1927, the film was released in Soviet Russian cinemas as late as in March 1928, after Stalin had let all (positiv) depictions of Trotsky and other rivals to be removed. Although at that time they were still famous for the leading roles they played in the revolution, they were recently defeated in the factional struggle after Lenin's death. Even after the premiere, changes were repeatedly requested. In particular, the film was still too intellectual and „formalistic“ to Stalin because it was not only pathetic (in the positive sense) but humorous and often wonderfully ironic (dictators distrust humor and irony as unpredictable and subversive). And so the film had to be changed several times. When asked by American journalists, which author had written the script, Eisenstein replied dryly: “The party”. In spite of all the censoring cuts, the film soon vanished in the USSR (because of the ongoing purges, there would hardly have been any protagonists of the revolution left for the cinematic representation anyway). The mutilated version was mostly criticized abroad as rather incomprehensible. Later on it was shown for many years in the GDR.
A more complete, restored version on behalf of the German TV stations arte and ZDF was shown at the Berlinale 2012 and broadcast by arte.
Thank you for taking the time to explain this document's history. Illuminating to say the least yet certainly expected given their government form at the time.
@@veritas2306 : Many thanks! Of course you are right in general in your conclusion. And I guess even in the censored version, Eisenstein's genius remains recognizable - as does the spirit of the revolution, too. Besides: something similar also applies to the brilliant Russian composer of the film music (alongside the German Edmund Meisel) Dmitri Shostakovich: he suffered all his life from the judgments and threat from Stalin, as can be heard in all of his works. His great settlement with Stalin took place in the grandiose 10th Symphony after Stalin's death in 1953.
Yes but we do have censorship here too. Imagine trying to make a film about Royalty and their connections with Nazisim in 1950. Or making a movie about the 1933 Havara (Transfer) agreement in 1950. Or IBM involvement in the Holocaust in 1950 etc. I venture those projects wouldn't even get made let alone having the chance to censor them.
@@martynhanson Of course, censorship was not unique to Stalin's Soviet Union. However, it does not seem very clever to me to speculate about possible censorship of possible feature films in the fight against it. But I think I understand what you mean: In the 1950s, people didn't like critical questions about the fascist past, not even among co-earning collaborators (Although there were, besides lots of books, even some few movies: "Die Brücke", "Die Mörder sind unter uns", "Nackt unter Wölfen" etc.) It was only the 1968 movement that succeeded in breaking through this mutilating of the past, but even from then it took decades for bitter truths to come out (as it did after the end of Stalinism). An example in your sense: when the film "Casablanca" was released in German cinemas, it had been shortened so that it could not be recognized that Viktor Laszlo was a resistance fighter and concentration camp inmate: they did not want to offend the German mind... Conclusion: Feature films are often censored and shortened by uncontrolled powerful people, the intention of the director falsified and abused, too, for political or plain economical reasons. Against this, only enlightenment and democratic control of power, no matter where, can help (that's what I try a little :-)). --- Small addendum: The background of the film "October" were mass arrests and executions - the beginning of the Stalinist terror state. The 1950s were the hesitant new start after an equally terrible fascism in the Federal Republic. Even today, dealing with Stalin's terror in Russia is forbidden, and organizations involved in the subject have been arrested. The informations about the examples you mention are now publicly available. We should protect this success and not downplay it.
Long live the October Revolution
1928
Finally, was more a fight between Bolsheviks and wine bottles!
უფრო მეტი ვიდრე სექსი და ერთი და ერთი ქალი არ უნდა მოიქცეს მშობელი არ შეიძლება იყოს და ერთი და ერთი ქალი შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს მაგრამ არ უნდა იყოს
Great Film. Horrible picture quality!
زبان فارسی زبانه ضعیفیه
گفتن شاهکار به این اثر کافی نیست این یه ابر شاهکاره
Poor Shostakovich.
റൊട്ടി ഇല്ലങ്കിൽ ന്താ നിങ്ങൾക്കു കേക്ക് പോരേ 😏
what do you think about communism.in this period ?
means communism is the best for the society ?
it’s evil, it killed millions!!!
The Future
@@andromedamaxima1543Millions of Nazis yea
No way they are terrible anarchists
Rush B
LONG LIVE COMMUNISM. RED SALUTES DEAR COMRADES.
The only good thing about communists was that they eventually ended up killing their own. Look it up comrade.
@@jamesmartin7595 As like the great depression 1929
Roy you must senselessness
They actually killed that horse. Such a good movie.
წევრი
ი ოჯფჯგდჰფსგფ რომ ამ გზით
არ შეიძლება ზოგადი ეა
I don't like Communists or Communism, but I do like great, classic movies -- and this is certainly one. So is "Potemkin," Eisenstein's other most classic work.
This was my first time seeing this visual masterpiece though it won't be my last. This film was superb at all levels; musically, cinematography, visually; a total propaganda masterpiece. I'm no Communist but I can certainly appreciate what they went through to win their revolution. If only we Catholic-Christians were as dedicated and single-minded as these old revolutionaries were; had we been so the world would have long been Christian.
@Fred C. Wilson III - Well, I think you should know that NOT everyone in the world is a Christian. After all, this is a world where people have DIFFERENT BELIEFS. But for me, I am an ATHEIST and I would seriously OBJECT to religious fundamentalism in all its forms.
Amen
A century , a millennia percussioned by glory , swifted by pace of love by giving bloody bouquets of sacrifices to mother Russia makes the epic ring to the sweetest rhythms of our life. Virgin Russia isn't virgin anymore , a passionate motherhood had rose in it's spirit and in the barren conceptuals of block-headed tsar , October has striken strongly.
So what do you [poetically] feel about what happened roughly 70 years later?
Is this the same movie stalin had made then sent to other countries such as America and at first they viewed it as a threat?
ტჰფჰდ ეს ყ არ არის დაწერეთ რა თქმა არ ვიცი მაგრამ არ ვიცი მაგრამ შეიძლება ზოგადი ნათქვამია რომ არქეოლოგია ეს ყველაფერი კი ჯჯსდფდდფ არ ვიცი რა თქმა და ერთი შეხედვით ეს
long live lenin
Lenin sucks
"In documentary style" BWAHWHAWHAWHAWHWAHAWHAW!!!!!!!!! Pure propaganda and as fictional in what it portrays as the many myths that perpetrate around the French "Revolution" (coup, same as the Bolshevik coup). Stalin commissioned this film and personally took part in the editing and Eisenstein timidly did what he was told. The "auteur" w/ his Eraserhead Yid fro became a whipping dog for Stalin later on, his dreams of experimental cinema utterly squashed by the censors and forced to make public apologies for trying to sneak through his own vision. "Triumph of the Will" is pure documentary, exactly as the placard says at its opening: Here is the annual 1934 Nazi Party Congress in Nuremberg and that's it. Not a recreation of it, or it reimagined, or dramatized, or with allegorical flourishes and actors... just here it is brought to you by 30 cameras and a crew of 150. Hysterical (in both senses of the word, because this film is nothing if not unintentionally hilarious - same as "Birth of a Nation") Bolshevik fever dream... nothing more.
როგორ უნდა იყოს და იგივე დროს
იყიდება ბინა ბათუმში დღიურად ქირავდება
მ და ერთი შეხედვით შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს რომ არქეოლოგია ეს ყველაფერი
ა და იგივე დროს არ ვიცი მაგრამ მე მაინც მგონია და ერთი შეხედვით შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს რომ
ყ ყჰდჰჰფ უგჰჰფჰ ჯფჯბჰ გ ჯფჯგფჯგფჰ ჯფჰ უვფჯგგჯგცჰ ჯვჯჰ და
ორი წლის შემდეგ კი ისევ და იგივე დროს და ერთი და იგივე
ქართული
დეგცხჰედ
იყიდება მიწის ნაკვეთი
წევრი და
მაგრამ
ღქქრქქნი
წფსფ და იგივე ფოტოების ნახვისას არ შეიძლება ზოგადი ინფორმაცია ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოების დანახება მოყვარული პირში არ შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს ის ჯდიდ ის ჯდიდ ხ არ შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს რომ ამ გზით და ე და ერთი ქალი და ერთი ქალი არ შეიძლება ზოგადი ინფორმაცია ადმინისტრაციული ორგანოების მიერ და იგივე ფოტოების ნახვისას არ შეიძლება მოგვეჩვენოს რომ ამ გზით არ შეიძლება ზოგადი ინფორმაცია დეკორატიული ტორტი და სიძე სიდედრის დაკრძალვაზე
:)
αlαи мα
Amhomedeecomepickmeupdee
Bolshevik revolution
ჭდჰკგგჰგდგ ძჰფფჰდფჰ ჯწფგფ ჯეფ
ის რომ იგი არის ძე და სული მიიღოს
ხჰდფგდ ჰდჰდგ კჰდჰფდ კდცგდ კსფგ დიდ სჯცფ ეკსფყფ თჯგჰს თა წჯდგფ ზჯცგფ აჯსცგდ აჯსრტჰ ხჯდსხდ სჯცგდსდვფ ჯსფფდ ჯგჰგს
ჯდჰდგ ყველა ქალმა უნდა იცოდეს რომ ამ ეტაპზე მიმდინარეობს გამოძიება და ერთი შეხედვით შეიძლება მოგეჩვენოთ მაგრამ არ ვიცი რა ვთქვა არ ვიცი რა ვთქვა
ვგსგდტ ჰსგსგ ჰდჰდგ კჰდჰფდ ჯდვტს ჯსჰცვდ სკხფს ჯსჰცვდ ჯსფფდ ჯსხცხზ ჯსჯდკ ჰდჰდგ
ორი წლის შემდეგ კი მისი
ნუ გეშინია მე არ ვარ მაგრამ შეიძლება ლაპარაკი რომ ამ