Was such a crazy experience flying out to Meta to try these out. Let me know what you think of the video! Curious if you could see a future version of these smart glasses replacing your phone?
Yes, smart glasses is the future I think, I don't see me using a phone whene these gets good enough, the thing most people can't understand is that when ai becomes even better and you can talk with it like a real person, like you almost can already with gpt, including ai in these types of products will change everything, everything you look at ai can explain, meassure, yea what ever you can think of, if a car runs towards you in the street, it can warn you before you even see the car, the keys you forgot where you had put it knows because it remembers everything. Yes i see this as the future and I can't wait for it.
Love the point you made about the phone sucking you out of the real world. What an awesome product that brings digital to our world. Great video, Kane. That $1M ARR is in the palm of your hand already. Exceptional work!
If they can price it around $1,000 the AR glasses will be a blockbuster product. It is amazing that they can do this better than Apple and probably at a much lower price. Way to go Zuck.
yoga would be amazing, because in these poses it's often impossible to look at a fixed screen but with glasses I can watch yoga instructions while simultaneously practicing
I agree on the 2040 thing. This stuff is still far away. Orion supposedly costs about 10k each. It's going to be some time before this really goes mainstream, but it's absolutely inevitable
2040? Do you realize how much exponential growth ai brings and what weve done in just the last 10? Internet has only been here around 25 yrs. Weve done all this and its getting faster. 2040? lol
@@PatralganNo way. Smartphones were introduced in 2007, and were ubiquitous by like 2012. More people will be using these than smartphones by 2030. Meta has already said it can make it smaller with better brightness, and better resolution, Orion is the prototype. The $10K figure is drawn from them mentioning they only made 1,000 of them so they'd need to sell them for $10K for it to make sense. But that's because manufacturing has a big up front cost and these are custom parts. Even just selling them in masse (like 1 million units) would cut the cost in half. Perfecting the manufacturing process and making deals with manufacturers would decrease it even more. They said they plan to release a better, thinner version in 3-5 years that costs as much as a flagship smartphone, so likely around $1,000.
Still waiting for years for AR-glasses that can help me navigate real streets using GPS and camera video recognition (as well as gyroscope/accelerometer orientation) to display "holographic" arrows and other navigation information pointing my path is straight through space.
Exactly, this was one of the first use cases I mentioned to the team. Imagine walking on the streets and having the path illuminated for you. Pure directions without looking down. This alone would be super cool
Those big black letters on the “ingredients” is so atypical of real-world usage. I know Meta is demonstrating what the possibilities are for the future, but it will be interesting to see how this tech would respond with actual text on product packaging in real-world lighting.
Good vid. I like what you said about apples & oranges. Lots of people are going to compare Orion to the Vision Pro because it's the only comparison, but they really don't compare. A unique complaint I heard from the VP is "yeah, the software's cool and all, but it's such a solitary experience." no different from being sucked into a smartphone, right? The sociality of these glasses really changes everything, not to mention the size. Meta's headstart in R&D ever since they bought Oculus is really starting to bear its fruit. That's why I'm rooting for them.
It's revolutionary. But I guess it's going to be popular until 2030. Unless apple don't let that happen.The tech improvements is unbelievable in past 2 years.
If they can fix your eye sight also that'd be pretty cool, on the fly vision adjustment with zoom and micro detail, zoom in and check out the moon surface from earth 👍 I would be in
Why is nobody comparing it to Magic Leap glasses, which were announced and already had a prototype a couple of years ago? I don’t know... it looks kind of the same size and seems capable of doing the same stuff as the Orion glasses.
>Magic leap has a cable, no one likes cyborgs. >Magic leap is huge, very heavy >Magic leap doesn't have huge money backing it, like Meta has. >Magic leap is ugly
They're not "holographic", they are stereoscopic in the exact same way that all VR/MR/AR headsets are (which is awesome). It's the size/miniaturization, weight, materials, Quality of display etc. that makes them so advanced. It is possible that they incorporate their research into holographic lens elements but I think that is specifically for VR anyway.
They are holographic, this term may not be familiar to most people when it comes to ar display technology, but if you've been following the space recently, you'd know this was the coming next step for any ar/mr display technology that uses waveguides.
Their is as snapchat has similar AR glasses that comes like a Quest 3 in a glass format and it will be available to select people so can you do a video or Meta Orion vs Snapchat Specticles please
I really need to know if it caused nausea or not, I know he said comfortable but he only wore it for a short time and it’s not too convincing, last time I bought AR glasses, no one on UA-cam mentioned the nausea in their reviews, until I got it myself, I really need REAL reviews
If the claim that it works as well as Vision Pro is true, then that is a huge achievement in hardware wise. But still I don't think it is as good as Vision Pro due to it lack some feature like face scan and smaller form which mean less processing power
I think that we don't need smart glasses with so many gadgets, but instead some functionalities that give us direct access through a pair of glasses to things like navigation, translation, teleprompting, receiving calls or notifications and being able to talk with an AI assistant. I found one smart glasses that do all of this at tiny cost: INMO Go... BTW the battery is good for near a week of normal use. But there are also others similar smart glasses at higher price like G1 or Frame. BTW Orion need that you put in your pocket a device for computing as large as a smartphone, so why not using a smartphone instead ?
Meta's Orion will be able to, and is even more capable of doing all these things you mentioned at a much higher fidelity as well due to better hardware and processing power. They've basically set the hardware for it to future proof all the requirements for full AR/MR display technologies. I do agree with you that they're better of just offloading the excess processing to a phone instead of another separate device (I actually believe this is there end goal for their consumer release model).
@@justiceifeme As an evereyday pair of glasses, it would be disrupting to ware this kind of smart glasses. My other preoccupation is the electrical capacity of such a gadget. The one I use since january give me as long as a week of autonomy before being charged again.
@@PACotnoir1 It's important to remember that these aren't being sold commercially yet, they're simply using it as a dev kit to start building up the software and app base for AR/MR. The consumer version will be smaller, lighter and less conspicuous than these. Concerning the battery life, thanks to the onboarding of the processing to an external device, the glasses themselves only have to worry about running the sensory data input, processing and output display. This hardly takes much energy to do compared to processing applications like hand tracking, videogames, AI, etc. This current prototype lasts fairly long for what it's actually capable of doing. I'm not exactly sure what device you're using, but if it can give you a week's worth of battery life before it's next charge, then it probably doesn't do much that requires heavy battery use. I can say this confidently as even some of the cheapest smart watches don't have that large a battery life, even though their form factor would allow for a larger battery to begin with. What I'd guess is that your device is only capable of doing the bare basics of ar but nothing as exquisite as what Orion is actually capable of. If it's a Rayneo 2, then it's got a smaller waveguide display area with a small Field of view (FOV), probably 2 to 3 cameras max and no eye and hand tracking to speak of whatsoever (it does come with a wireless ring for interfacing with the glasses though). I'm not even sure it has it's own speakers or not, while Orion has all these features at greater quality and much more performance capabilities. This is why they're not even comparable really, it's like comparing the latest iPhone to a $150 dollar budget smartphone. Yeah they both do similar things, but one of them does it to a whole other level in every respect.
There's literally no need for that, if someone is using these in public, there's no law prohibiting filming other people in public spaces. For more private spaces, the owners of those establishments can make their own decisions on the matter. On an individual level, you really don't need to feel uncomfortable with being recorded especially in public (knowingly or not), because that's happening everytime all around you. Traffic light cameras, Bank and business security cameras, tourists, IRL vloggers, regular people taking selfies, etc., are all recording you whether you're aware of it or not, simply because it's done on a pair of glasses doesn't change the fact that in the modern day, we're always being recorded. And if someone really wanted to record you in secret, there'd be no way for you to know. There are hidden button cameras, smart watch cameras, and even special made spy camera glasses that record in infrared so you can't even see the camera lens 'cause it's hidden behind an opaque glass layer.
@@justiceifeme Yes, but if you film for longer than a certain time and keep a single person in focus it is illegal where I live. Not to mention people don't like it as a general rule. You're right, CCTV and public transport are recording. But this can open doors for pedophiles and pervs. Look how many people are caught cause you can see where people are filming with their phones. Imagine sunglasses. That's why you wear them at poker games.
@@MrIlleism I agree that most people find it uncomfortable and unnerving to be filmed nearly everywhere they go outside their homes, including myself, but that's not the main issue here. You brought up filming a specific person for longer than would be Considered reasonable being illegal, which I also agree with, but you must understand that the illegal part about that special situation is it becoming harassment rather than simply recording. I'm not sure exactly how the laws work in your area (since I don't know where you live), but most western nations have laws that do not prohibit public photography, which includes video recording, and only has restrictions on things that would be bordering on infringing another person's rights in some way. For example, you can film people in public so long as you don't impede their free movement (freedom of movement), follow them insicently (harassment bordering on stalking), and or even hindering them from performing their Job/occupation. If you noticed, these things aren't exclusive to the act of recording itself, if you did these things without a camera, you'd still face the risk of lawful punishment, but never for the simple act of recording. As most countries go, when it comes to public photography,*"if you can see it with your eyes, you can record it"* as the saying goes. To address your second point, yeah pedophiles and perverts that relish in the thought of exploiting these rights to public recording will always be an issue, however, that's not something you can stop by banning public photography (some of them literally find work as security camera crew in Business to have access to as much video content as they like). Also, if someone is actively trying to record specific individuals without their knowledge; using these ar glasses wouldn't be the best idea, since you literally need to be steering in the direction of whatever it is you want to record, so if someone really wanted to focus on only recording you specifically, it'd become relatively obvious very quickly. It'd be easier to catch a perv literally staring at people for longer than would be considered normal, than it'd be to simply pretend to be looking for a good signal on your smartphone while actually trying to record people "inappropriately". The funny thing is, even if you could tell when people are recording with these devices, you can't really stop them from doing so, you can literally walk out in public with a spy button camera and record secretly to your heart's delight, then post it online with zero repercussions. So having many people wearing these glasses (whether you can tell when they're recording or not) won't matter if everywhere you turn to avoid being recorded ends up being another person with glasses. Just accept that in the modern world we live in today, walking out into public is literally exposing yourself to these potential scenarios.
The price of this prototype unit would have to be $10K with how expensive it currently is to make, but they won’t release them publicly until they can get the price down to comparable of that of an iPhone
@@jonatan01iNot to mention, these are only slightly chunkier than most people's glasses. In the 2010s people wore those hipster glasses that were nearly as big as these lmao. Plus Zuck already said they know how to make them smaller and better. They learned a lot from making Orion. I think they wanted to show this off because they want to build hype, show that they're a serious contender in the hardware market, and get the 1,000 devs that have been given Orion's to start building software for them.
I like how everyone just behaved like rayneo tcl didn’t release this some months ago already .if it were Apple that release this product y’all would chewed them up😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That's because the rayneo (as impressive as it is) doesn't compare to what Meta has done with their Orion AR glasses. Orion has it beat in FOV, hand tracking, eye tracking, interactive holographic displays, true Mixed reality overlay (instead of the static 3d images on the Rayneo), and overall processing power.
@@kallaway i figured as much, i feel like it would've been less misleading/clickbaity if there had been an indication that this was a reaction recorded in the past :) regardless, congrats on getting to try orion, it does look incredibly cool and i'm definetly jealous
Was such a crazy experience flying out to Meta to try these out. Let me know what you think of the video! Curious if you could see a future version of these smart glasses replacing your phone?
Yes, smart glasses is the future I think, I don't see me using a phone whene these gets good enough, the thing most people can't understand is that when ai becomes even better and you can talk with it like a real person, like you almost can already with gpt, including ai in these types of products will change everything, everything you look at ai can explain, meassure, yea what ever you can think of, if a car runs towards you in the street, it can warn you before you even see the car, the keys you forgot where you had put it knows because it remembers everything. Yes i see this as the future and I can't wait for it.
I can’t remember the last time I’ve been this excited about a piece of tech
me either, it was super sick to try these on. Felt like a window into the future
Same 😂
Trash you mean
@@kallawayhow is it like when compared to the Vision Pro, I am talking in terms of image quality and hand tracking
It’s $10,000 to produce….
Of all tech companies that tried their hands on AR, i can't believe meta is the only company who understand what people want for AR headset.
Love the point you made about the phone sucking you out of the real world. What an awesome product that brings digital to our world. Great video, Kane. That $1M ARR is in the palm of your hand already. Exceptional work!
Appreciate you for checking this out!
If they can price it around $1,000 the AR glasses will be a blockbuster product. It is amazing that they can do this better than Apple and probably at a much lower price. Way to go Zuck.
Yep, I think these will come in between $1-$2K
$10,000 to produce….
This channel is going places. Love how you tell a story!
yoga would be amazing, because in these poses it's often impossible to look at a fixed screen but with glasses I can watch yoga instructions while simultaneously practicing
I agree on the 2040 thing. This stuff is still far away. Orion supposedly costs about 10k each. It's going to be some time before this really goes mainstream, but it's absolutely inevitable
2040? Do you realize how much exponential growth ai brings and what weve done in just the last 10? Internet has only been here around 25 yrs. Weve done all this and its getting faster. 2040? lol
Until 2030 is released for sure...
The rate which technology is advancing, I think it'll be a bit sooner. Like 2035 for mass adoption at the latest.
If there'll be good software/SDKs to develop for it, I'm buying it for 10k, that's a no brainer.
@@PatralganNo way. Smartphones were introduced in 2007, and were ubiquitous by like 2012. More people will be using these than smartphones by 2030. Meta has already said it can make it smaller with better brightness, and better resolution, Orion is the prototype. The $10K figure is drawn from them mentioning they only made 1,000 of them so they'd need to sell them for $10K for it to make sense. But that's because manufacturing has a big up front cost and these are custom parts. Even just selling them in masse (like 1 million units) would cut the cost in half. Perfecting the manufacturing process and making deals with manufacturers would decrease it even more. They said they plan to release a better, thinner version in 3-5 years that costs as much as a flagship smartphone, so likely around $1,000.
Still waiting for years for AR-glasses that can help me navigate real streets using GPS and camera video recognition (as well as gyroscope/accelerometer orientation) to display "holographic" arrows and other navigation information pointing my path is straight through space.
Exactly, this was one of the first use cases I mentioned to the team. Imagine walking on the streets and having the path illuminated for you. Pure directions without looking down. This alone would be super cool
Really proud of you being able to test these products, keep it up bro
Dude, you're crushing it. So cool.
Those big black letters on the “ingredients” is so atypical of real-world usage. I know Meta is demonstrating what the possibilities are for the future, but it will be interesting to see how this tech would respond with actual text on product packaging in real-world lighting.
👓🤓 can’t wait to see these out in the real world
will be insane!
Good vid. I like what you said about apples & oranges. Lots of people are going to compare Orion to the Vision Pro because it's the only comparison, but they really don't compare.
A unique complaint I heard from the VP is "yeah, the software's cool and all, but it's such a solitary experience." no different from being sucked into a smartphone, right? The sociality of these glasses really changes everything, not to mention the size. Meta's headstart in R&D ever since they bought Oculus is really starting to bear its fruit. That's why I'm rooting for them.
Great Review! I so want this and the meta Ray-Ban!
It's revolutionary. But I guess it's going to be popular until 2030. Unless apple don't let that happen.The tech improvements is unbelievable in past 2 years.
Google Glasses sure were ahead of its time
1.5M focal plane. Just another almost-AR device, but it does have a 70 degree FOV.
If they can fix your eye sight also that'd be pretty cool, on the fly vision adjustment with zoom and micro detail, zoom in and check out the moon surface from earth 👍 I would be in
Yes, that would be a better use case.
Im pretty sure their final goal includes a glove and is highly inspired by ARI, the AR glasses in heavy rain 😷
Why is nobody comparing it to Magic Leap glasses, which were announced and already had a prototype a couple of years ago? I don’t know... it looks kind of the same size and seems capable of doing the same stuff as the Orion glasses.
>Magic leap has a cable, no one likes cyborgs.
>Magic leap is huge, very heavy
>Magic leap doesn't have huge money backing it, like Meta has.
>Magic leap is ugly
🔥🔥
They're not "holographic", they are stereoscopic in the exact same way that all VR/MR/AR headsets are (which is awesome). It's the size/miniaturization, weight, materials, Quality of display etc. that makes them so advanced. It is possible that they incorporate their research into holographic lens elements but I think that is specifically for VR anyway.
They are holographic, this term may not be familiar to most people when it comes to ar display technology, but if you've been following the space recently, you'd know this was the coming next step for any ar/mr display technology that uses waveguides.
Of course , because you have seen the future successor of your smartphone (goes to museum like the cable phone) 😂😂😂
I want this
Their is as snapchat has similar AR glasses that comes like a Quest 3 in a glass format and it will be available to select people so can you do a video or Meta Orion vs Snapchat Specticles please
How do you get in to meet everyone
I have something I’d really like to show zuck and everyone at meta
It will pair with Orion and other devices
Neuralinks by 2040
I really need to know if it caused nausea or not, I know he said comfortable but he only wore it for a short time and it’s not too convincing, last time I bought AR glasses, no one on UA-cam mentioned the nausea in their reviews, until I got it myself, I really need REAL reviews
2040 god damn that sounds weird
These glasses will start to pick up traction around 2030 once they have the materials they need. And the pricing is fair enough.
If the claim that it works as well as Vision Pro is true, then that is a huge achievement in hardware wise. But still I don't think it is as good as Vision Pro due to it lack some feature like face scan and smaller form which mean less processing power
It can do face scanning, just as good as the vision pro
I think that we don't need smart glasses with so many gadgets, but instead some functionalities that give us direct access through a pair of glasses to things like navigation, translation, teleprompting, receiving calls or notifications and being able to talk with an AI assistant. I found one smart glasses that do all of this at tiny cost: INMO Go... BTW the battery is good for near a week of normal use. But there are also others similar smart glasses at higher price like G1 or Frame. BTW Orion need that you put in your pocket a device for computing as large as a smartphone, so why not using a smartphone instead ?
Meta's Orion will be able to, and is even more capable of doing all these things you mentioned at a much higher fidelity as well due to better hardware and processing power. They've basically set the hardware for it to future proof all the requirements for full AR/MR display technologies.
I do agree with you that they're better of just offloading the excess processing to a phone instead of another separate device (I actually believe this is there end goal for their consumer release model).
@@justiceifeme As an evereyday pair of glasses, it would be disrupting to ware this kind of smart glasses. My other preoccupation is the electrical capacity of such a gadget. The one I use since january give me as long as a week of autonomy before being charged again.
@@PACotnoir1 It's important to remember that these aren't being sold commercially yet, they're simply using it as a dev kit to start building up the software and app base for AR/MR. The consumer version will be smaller, lighter and less conspicuous than these.
Concerning the battery life, thanks to the onboarding of the processing to an external device, the glasses themselves only have to worry about running the sensory data input, processing and output display. This hardly takes much energy to do compared to processing applications like hand tracking, videogames, AI, etc. This current prototype lasts fairly long for what it's actually capable of doing.
I'm not exactly sure what device you're using, but if it can give you a week's worth of battery life before it's next charge, then it probably doesn't do much that requires heavy battery use. I can say this confidently as even some of the cheapest smart watches don't have that large a battery life, even though their form factor would allow for a larger battery to begin with.
What I'd guess is that your device is only capable of doing the bare basics of ar but nothing as exquisite as what Orion is actually capable of. If it's a Rayneo 2, then it's got a smaller waveguide display area with a small Field of view (FOV), probably 2 to 3 cameras max and no eye and hand tracking to speak of whatsoever (it does come with a wireless ring for interfacing with the glasses though). I'm not even sure it has it's own speakers or not, while Orion has all these features at greater quality and much more performance capabilities.
This is why they're not even comparable really, it's like comparing the latest iPhone to a $150 dollar budget smartphone. Yeah they both do similar things, but one of them does it to a whole other level in every respect.
Just not keen on these at all - not in the smallest bit. Congrats on getting the chance to take a look tho
On the one hand, the tech is impressive. Otoh, it’s sad that the glasses make users look like Zuck. Ick.
Looks great. By the way, the pinch gesture is present since Oculus Quest 2, maybe even before, so apple copied to meta 😅
I use quest 2 , false
It will take another 5 years for price to be low. Optimistic scenario: u can buy one under 2 years at high price.
I think they’ll be priced the same as an iPhone ($1100-$1500) in 2 years
I love this but I don't want creeps to film me without my knowing. If someone is filming a indicator should be on like on a laptop.
There's literally no need for that, if someone is using these in public, there's no law prohibiting filming other people in public spaces. For more private spaces, the owners of those establishments can make their own decisions on the matter.
On an individual level, you really don't need to feel uncomfortable with being recorded especially in public (knowingly or not), because that's happening everytime all around you. Traffic light cameras, Bank and business security cameras, tourists, IRL vloggers, regular people taking selfies, etc., are all recording you whether you're aware of it or not, simply because it's done on a pair of glasses doesn't change the fact that in the modern day, we're always being recorded.
And if someone really wanted to record you in secret, there'd be no way for you to know. There are hidden button cameras, smart watch cameras, and even special made spy camera glasses that record in infrared so you can't even see the camera lens 'cause it's hidden behind an opaque glass layer.
@@justiceifeme Yes, but if you film for longer than a certain time and keep a single person in focus it is illegal where I live. Not to mention people don't like it as a general rule.
You're right, CCTV and public transport are recording. But this can open doors for pedophiles and pervs. Look how many people are caught cause you can see where people are filming with their phones. Imagine sunglasses. That's why you wear them at poker games.
@@MrIlleism I agree that most people find it uncomfortable and unnerving to be filmed nearly everywhere they go outside their homes, including myself, but that's not the main issue here. You brought up filming a specific person for longer than would be Considered reasonable being illegal, which I also agree with, but you must understand that the illegal part about that special situation is it becoming harassment rather than simply recording.
I'm not sure exactly how the laws work in your area (since I don't know where you live), but most western nations have laws that do not prohibit public photography, which includes video recording, and only has restrictions on things that would be bordering on infringing another person's rights in some way. For example, you can film people in public so long as you don't impede their free movement (freedom of movement), follow them insicently (harassment bordering on stalking), and or even hindering them from performing their Job/occupation. If you noticed, these things aren't exclusive to the act of recording itself, if you did these things without a camera, you'd still face the risk of lawful punishment, but never for the simple act of recording. As most countries go, when it comes to public photography,*"if you can see it with your eyes, you can record it"* as the saying goes.
To address your second point, yeah pedophiles and perverts that relish in the thought of exploiting these rights to public recording will always be an issue, however, that's not something you can stop by banning public photography (some of them literally find work as security camera crew in Business to have access to as much video content as they like).
Also, if someone is actively trying to record specific individuals without their knowledge; using these ar glasses wouldn't be the best idea, since you literally need to be steering in the direction of whatever it is you want to record, so if someone really wanted to focus on only recording you specifically, it'd become relatively obvious very quickly. It'd be easier to catch a perv literally staring at people for longer than would be considered normal, than it'd be to simply pretend to be looking for a good signal on your smartphone while actually trying to record people "inappropriately".
The funny thing is, even if you could tell when people are recording with these devices, you can't really stop them from doing so, you can literally walk out in public with a spy button camera and record secretly to your heart's delight, then post it online with zero repercussions. So having many people wearing these glasses (whether you can tell when they're recording or not) won't matter if everywhere you turn to avoid being recorded ends up being another person with glasses. Just accept that in the modern world we live in today, walking out into public is literally exposing yourself to these potential scenarios.
Amazing!! Can’t wait until they’re on eBay for £50 😂
But then they’ll be outdated :/
the zucc is entering his prime 🏄♂️🇺🇸
If I am not wrong price $10000
The price of this prototype unit would have to be $10K with how expensive it currently is to make, but they won’t release them publicly until they can get the price down to comparable of that of an iPhone
RIP Apple
Super ugly, will wait until they're able to make them look like regular glasses.
Imagine saying you don't have a computer or a phone because they're uggly. nah
@@jonatan01iNot to mention, these are only slightly chunkier than most people's glasses. In the 2010s people wore those hipster glasses that were nearly as big as these lmao.
Plus Zuck already said they know how to make them smaller and better. They learned a lot from making Orion. I think they wanted to show this off because they want to build hype, show that they're a serious contender in the hardware market, and get the 1,000 devs that have been given Orion's to start building software for them.
when will this project get canned
This one is a keeper. Will look like normal raybans in next iteration
I like how everyone just behaved like rayneo tcl didn’t release this some months ago already .if it were Apple that release this product y’all would chewed them up😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That's because the rayneo (as impressive as it is) doesn't compare to what Meta has done with their Orion AR glasses. Orion has it beat in FOV, hand tracking, eye tracking, interactive holographic displays, true Mixed reality overlay (instead of the static 3d images on the Rayneo), and overall processing power.
have they googled glasses?
people who wear them will soon be called glassholes
lol
"top secret consumer tech product"
- publicly showcased at connect
- won't be sold to consumers
???
Yeah I was able to try it two weeks in advance of the event (was in that demo video they showed), but couldn’t drop until this week
@@kallaway i figured as much, i feel like it would've been less misleading/clickbaity if there had been an indication that this was a reaction recorded in the past :) regardless, congrats on getting to try orion, it does look incredibly cool and i'm definetly jealous