I've been taking a couple of gap years after finishing my MS, and I'm going back for my PhD in January. Your stuff has been a nice way to keep refreshing my book knowledge.
Everything have its limited then if every people understood this then there is no controversy, simple and clear. If you see something by the light based on the photon emitted then there are limited your eyes based on the frequencies. If the photons have no its frequency or only have its vibration like Tesla said then you cant see the object or not fully sharp with it called invisible likely radar undeted. the Bond Force or many kind of bond or how many different matter interact then you can detect or cant not detect its bond. P/s: The infrared light is the light human eyes can not see then we see missing that light or not ? Same as is other bond so O-H bond based geometry or its sharpe? So you can make hidden radar material or hidden bond material like dark matter. Thor way is opened for your travelling.
THANKS A LOT. We are studying Coordination and Complex compounds at school. I watched your VBT, MOT, and complex compounds videos for further explanations to the stuff. But, I was missing the Back bonding. And here you are, with the stuff! Really appreciate your work. :)
Transition metals are just fantastic. Even in deep space we can see some of these in massive star forming regions after a supernova (making it a second or third generation star). They sometimes end up in more distant planets and can break down in their formation but in doing such can form many other important compounds.
Dear Prof. David, at 08:53, I think the orbital of nitrogen should be sp hybridized orbital instead of a p orbital and sp hybridized orbital should make the donation to the metal in the first place. Is this true? or am I missing something?
well, 10:32 certainly explains why carbon monoxide is so dangerous; it makes sense why uncharged diatomic oxygen would be so strongly outcompeted, affinity-wise.
Professor Dave if you are willing would you do an episode on organic molecules in cosmology and how these can form in a post supernova gas cloud? I am selfishly asking as modeling star forming regions was my dissertation.
Cool explaination, but only one MINOR(!) mistake: some of your dz2 orbitals look star-ish like dxz but should look more like dumbell in a knot or a teslacoil or how ever to describe.
Prof. Dave, there will be only 1 lone pair on O in NO+. Please correct it. It may have been crept in the video by mistake. By the way, your content is great. Thank you.
@ProfessorDave I had a hypothesis that the earth is faster orbiting the sun when it is closest to the sun and slower speed when the earth is farthest away from the sun. I dont have the knowledge or tools to test this hypothesis so I was wondering if im correct in my understanding of gravity and ellypitical orbits. I hope to use this simple hypothesis to covince my flat earther cousin of using some actual critical thinking to figure things out.
Your idea is correct, the Earth (and any other orbiting object) does move faster during the closer part of its orbit. Look up Kepler's theorem often described as 'equal areas over equal times' which describes the relationship.
I was thrown for a loop by the triple-bonded carbonyl.. never seen this before & can't find anything about it on Google??? How does this happen... An electron from oxygen somehow ended up on the carbon?? Help
Still no closer to me figuring out by sheer beginner luck how to make a hydrocarbon fuel cell or an acid battery that is chemically recharged by hydrocarbons and oxygen.
I've been taking a couple of gap years after finishing my MS, and I'm going back for my PhD in January. Your stuff has been a nice way to keep refreshing my book knowledge.
What are the books you used to refer
Can I know them 😀
Basically I am an undergraduate one
@@phenol9321 principles of modern chemistry by oxtoby is my go-to. Also electrochemical methods by bard, which is the electrochemistry bible
Everything have its limited then if every people understood this then there is no controversy, simple and clear.
If you see something by the light based on the photon emitted then there are limited your eyes based on the frequencies. If the photons have no its frequency or only have its vibration like Tesla said then you cant see the object or not fully sharp with it called invisible likely radar undeted.
the Bond Force or many kind of bond or how many different matter interact then you can detect or cant not detect its bond.
P/s: The infrared light is the light human eyes can not see then we see missing that light or not ? Same as is other bond so O-H bond based geometry or its sharpe? So you can make hidden radar material or hidden bond material like dark matter. Thor way is opened for your travelling.
Same here Jan 13 Chem PhD student. After 20 plus years in the industry. Chemistry is not like riding a bicycle.
taking the inorganic chemistry exam in a couple of days, this is very helpful, thank you professor dave
From periodic tables to ligands, this episode has it all! Looking forward to the "tricky ligands" next!
THANKS A LOT. We are studying Coordination and Complex compounds at school. I watched your VBT, MOT, and complex compounds videos for further explanations to the stuff. But, I was missing the Back bonding. And here you are, with the stuff! Really appreciate your work. :)
Chemistry, both organic and inorganic, is a fascinating subject. Thank you.
Transition metals are just fantastic. Even in deep space we can see some of these in massive star forming regions after a supernova (making it a second or third generation star). They sometimes end up in more distant planets and can break down in their formation but in doing such can form many other important compounds.
I’m a D block nerd. There is more Au and Pt and diamonds in the seeable universe than wood.
God bless you Professor Dave for continuing in this series. I am so excited :)
Thank you sir .....I'm just loving your classes 🙏🙏🙇♀️🙇♀️
Thank you professor for nice explanation
Very helpful dave thanks for this video
Professor dave i have question not related to your topic a have equation which species is amphoteric A. H2S B.HS C. Cl D. HCl
HS-
@@ProfessorDaveExplains how to the answer is HS
@@ruhamamoke623 it can both lose and gain a proton
@@ProfessorDaveExplains thanks sir
Dear Prof. David, at 08:53, I think the orbital of nitrogen should be sp hybridized orbital instead of a p orbital and sp hybridized orbital should make the donation to the metal in the first place. Is this true? or am I missing something?
Great series sir
well, 10:32 certainly explains why carbon monoxide is so dangerous; it makes sense why uncharged diatomic oxygen would be so strongly outcompeted, affinity-wise.
In 10:30, why carbon has a partial negative charge if oxygen is more electronegative?
Professor Dave if you are willing would you do an episode on organic molecules in cosmology and how these can form in a post supernova gas cloud? I am selfishly asking as modeling star forming regions was my dissertation.
Is it correct to call the R-S- ion a sulfoxide? at 6 min 42 sec. Wouldn't that be an alkyl sulfide? And a sulfoxide would require an oxygen in there?
Prof
Can you make a videos for Numerical analysis
Cool explaination, but only one MINOR(!) mistake: some of your dz2 orbitals look star-ish like dxz but should look more like dumbell in a knot or a teslacoil or how ever to describe.
Coincidentally learning this on chemistry
Prof. Dave, there will be only 1 lone pair on O in NO+. Please correct it. It may have been crept in the video by mistake. By the way, your content is great. Thank you.
No this is correct. Though there are two ways nitrosyl can bond.
I think that second pair comes up in O linkage of nitrosyl to metal ion. Thanks for correction. Please keep up the good work.
@ProfessorDave I had a hypothesis that the earth is faster orbiting the sun when it is closest to the sun and slower speed when the earth is farthest away from the sun. I dont have the knowledge or tools to test this hypothesis so I was wondering if im correct in my understanding of gravity and ellypitical orbits. I hope to use this simple hypothesis to covince my flat earther cousin of using some actual critical thinking to figure things out.
Your idea is correct, the Earth (and any other orbiting object) does move faster during the closer part of its orbit. Look up Kepler's theorem often described as 'equal areas over equal times' which describes the relationship.
I was thrown for a loop by the triple-bonded carbonyl.. never seen this before & can't find anything about it on Google??? How does this happen... An electron from oxygen somehow ended up on the carbon?? Help
Professor Dave Explains dah dah dah dun! (womp)
Sir, how learn to all element on periodic table easily?
Watch this series from the beginning!
@@ProfessorDaveExplains ok sir thank you 🥰❤
@@MeeraDevi-cj8kb See the Periodic Table Song, from ASAP Science.
@@carultch okay☺👍
off topic but can you make a video on PragerU
Love form India🥰
Good
Atoms be crazy
Still no closer to me figuring out by sheer beginner luck how to make a hydrocarbon fuel cell or an acid battery that is chemically recharged by hydrocarbons and oxygen.
Brahmāstra
Video hay rất tuyệt vời. Chúc bạn gặp nhiều may mắn và sức khoẻ. Đã xem và ủng hộ bạn. Cố gắng phát triển kênh thành công nha bạn hiền của tôi.
🙂👍
hi
Lezzzz bond
hey, great video, but please talk a bit slower 😂
おはようございます