Liberal Hypocrisy On Sex

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 бер 2019
  • Prior to the sexual revolution, society had a certain moral consensus on sexual behaviour. Then, factions in society started pushing for a cultural shift that led to the sexual revolution based on a desire to liberalize sexuality.
    The argument went that it’s nobody’s business what consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes.
    And this was a persuasive argument and continues to be one today, but unless you’re a libertarian or an anarchist, it leaves you open to a serious contradiction.
    Because, this idea of consent absolving the parties from any wrong doing depends on the premise that it’s impossible to be a victim of something if you consented to it. But we don’t think that way for other aspects of our lives. When it comes to economic transactions, we don’t hold this same principle. In fact, we decry it.
    Take the housing crash of 2008. Virtually everyone, but especially people on the left, came away from that blaming the bankers and lenders. Very few people had the audacity to say that the people who signed on to mortgages that they couldn’t afford were just as culpable in that blame.
    In that scenario, we have two consenting adults, agreeing to something but most people seem to agree, those kinds of consenting transactions should be regulated by the law.
    Take another example. The left has been consistent in promoting the cause of minimum wage. In other words, it’s not enough for two adults to look at a price for labor and agree to it between the two of them.
    And if you believe that, then you HAVE to concede that consent between two adults isn’t enough to prevent society or the state from taking an interest.
    So if you’re someone who believes that consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want when it comes to sex, but when it comes to economics, we can’t allow that, then you’re harboring a serious contradiction.
    So, we have this bizarre double standard and contradiction when it comes to our sexual ethic and its no wonder we’ve been suffering from an outbreak of STDs, unintended pregnancies, a serious decline in mental health, and a staggering lack of success in marriage.
    If it isn’t obvious, I’d say the solution is to treat sex like everything else we exercise prudential judgement with whether it be financial transactions or something like nutrition.
    And nutrition’s actually a really good example because it is a biological function with a clear purpose but also has the potential to produce pleasure and influence social dynamics just as sexuality does.
    But notice how cautious we are when it comes to our nutrition. Nobody would ever endorse a nutritional approach that says, do whatever feels good as along as everyone’s consenting.
    And what informs our good decisions around nutrition is that we have never lost sight of the fact that the purpose of eating is to fuel our bodies. Pleasure is merely an effect, but if we mistook pleasure as the purpose, then things would go downhill fast.
    And that’s what we’ve seen with sex. Imagine, for example, if you were able to be transported to an alien world in which people would routinely logon to the internet just to watch other people eating delicious food, or if there were adult clubs in which someone would come out from behind a curtain and perform a little dance while holding a plate of burgers.*
    You’d probably say, their instincts for food have gone off the rails. Well, that’s basically what’s happened to us with sex.
    So, if the purpose of nutrition is what informs our choices when it comes to eating, maybe we can learn from that and ask ourselves what the purpose of sex is because pleasure isn’t it. It has a very explicit biological purpose, but we’ve divorced ourselves from it. We’ve tried to have all the pleasurable effects of sex without the effects synonymous with its biological purpose in the same way that someone suffering from bulimia might try to enjoy their favorite foods but vomit them up so that they don’t produce the undesirable consequences.
    But the thing nobody wants to hear is that the only fail-safe solution to our problems is monogamy. We’ve embraced a new sexual ethic that promised to liberate us from those constraints. But seriously, how constrained is it.
    I’ve only ever had one sexual partner in my life, but I’m willing to bet that I’ve enjoyed far more consistently fulfilling sexual experiences than bachelors who are my age.
    And I’ve been able to do so liberated from all baggage of wondering if I’m going to get infected or accidentally get someone pregnant. I’ve never had to worry about what allowing someone into my life in that way will do if I don’t intend to have an ongoing relationship with them. And I’ve always been able to experience sexuality with the full knowledge that the person I’m experiencing it with is committed to loving me.
    * This argument is borrowed from CS Lewis' Mere Christianity

КОМЕНТАРІ • 357

  • @Malik-hz5fg
    @Malik-hz5fg 5 років тому +105

    “Dance seductively with a tray of burgers” 😂😂😂

  • @georgepaul7019
    @georgepaul7019 5 років тому +235

    You've a tremendous gift to articulate an idea. The analogy with food drives your point home really well. Keep doing this. God bless you!

    • @jakefelty
      @jakefelty 5 років тому +9

      George Paul
      CS Lewis used a very similar analogy. I wonder if he got it from there

    • @jonsumm5798
      @jonsumm5798 3 роки тому

      the analogy is from "Mere Christianity" by CS Lewis

    • @sophiesong8937
      @sophiesong8937 3 роки тому

      I'd say as far as the food analogy works is that society singularly shames women for eating anything but a controlled diet, just as the religious shame girls and women for being anything but a pure gift to their husband, a vessel for his pleasure and for carrying his children.
      But in reality, most people are probably far less careful about their diet than they are their sex life. And it isn't the non religious who consider marriage to be a permanent contract of consent. Fraudulent and dishonest conduct of a sexual partner can also have legal consequences.

    • @slevesque8131
      @slevesque8131 3 роки тому

      Interestingly enough, in my largely religious circle, nobody shames anyone for eating whatever they want, and we hold the boys and men to the same standard as we hold the girls and women - that of a chaste person preparing for or living in a lifelong monogamous relationship for the good of both spouses and the begetting and raising of children. It's incredibly freeing to be without the ridiculous norms society wishes to impose, judging by my friends who are imposed upon by said societal norms.

    • @sophiesong8937
      @sophiesong8937 3 роки тому

      @@slevesque8131 Holding others to a standard of chastity can do tremendous harm, no matter how good the intention.

  • @Velakowitz
    @Velakowitz 5 років тому +128

    A very good philosophical argument. I'm not Catholic, but you represent Christendom well! God save the West.

    • @Velakowitz
      @Velakowitz 2 роки тому +10

      Update: I converted to Catholicism. Pray for me!

    • @kafirking6230
      @kafirking6230 Рік тому +4

      ​@@Velakowitz God bless you

  • @jhonklan3794
    @jhonklan3794 3 роки тому +33

    Not religious but this argument really convinced me to practice abstinence. More people need to hear this!

  • @rafaelcarbone1387
    @rafaelcarbone1387 5 років тому +23

    How beautiful to have only one sex partner in life. And how wonderful and encouraging to those who have are still virgins to remain that way until marriage. Thank you for being so candid.

  • @ianwilson1518
    @ianwilson1518 5 років тому +65

    5:54 sounds like someone's been reading CS Lewis

    • @chrisselph2674
      @chrisselph2674 4 роки тому +2

      Ian Wilson yeah I commented on that too before I saw this from you it’s ok though

  • @philc5499
    @philc5499 5 років тому +81

    The Truth cuts through the mire like a flaming sword. Well done!

    • @rupert5066
      @rupert5066 3 роки тому +1

      @Seven Inches of Throbbing Pink Jesus cringe

  • @jameskearney4100
    @jameskearney4100 5 років тому +102

    I wish I had been with just one partner. It means so much and the other leaves you so empty. God forgive me !!!

    • @frankkinley6272
      @frankkinley6272 5 років тому +30

      @Cardinal Ratzinger Guild
      Your comment is absolutely inappropriate & disturbing. James Kearney has shared an important insight into the dangers of having multiple relationships which takes a great act of humility to do so.
      People will see his comment & may think twice before engaging in such dangerous behavior. Your attempt to belittle his contribution is simply wrong & truthfully an apology is in order.

    • @agentjs09
      @agentjs09 5 років тому +18

      If you have repented, then God has surely already forgiven you. You have been given an extraordinary grace. You are able to see the error of your former ways. Not everyone can say the same. God loves you.

    • @johnharkness6304
      @johnharkness6304 5 років тому +2

      Take up your pilgrims staff James, and walk with the Lord, never look back (once your sins have been washed away in the blood of Christ in confession, of course )👍

    • @GG-qg2iu
      @GG-qg2iu 5 років тому +7

      @Cardinal Ratzinger Guild The lol is what makes you appear uncharitable. Yes, the confessional is where these sins stay, but when people give testimony, it can help others. Do you think Abby Johnson is proud of working at PP and having 2 abortions? Do you think it's possible that another girl might learn from her mistakes?

    • @theguardian6464
      @theguardian6464 5 років тому +5

      It's never too late...we were both in this situation before our marriage with my spouse. And this time we were smart enough to wait.

  • @christopherlarsen7788
    @christopherlarsen7788 5 років тому +52

    I agree with the premise. That being that (1) throughout plant and animal life, sex is for reproduction of the species; and (2) humans fair better as individuals and society when sex is delineated through marriage.
    That said, the fact that food nourishes our bodies, but also tastes wonderful, is no accident. My dear old Catholic mom explained to me in no uncertain terms when I was just 16-years-old that God intended for sex to feel good! God made sex pleasurable, by His design. So, yes, for reproduction but also yes, for pleasure. Not one or the other, but both. The joys of this life come with responsibilities. This is good.

    • @suppeople9987
      @suppeople9987 5 років тому +2

      Food is not unintentional good tasting the taste is supposed to tell us what may be good for human survival

    • @spidernymph8964
      @spidernymph8964 5 років тому +12

      @)Christopher Larsen Yeah, I don't think he intended to say that sex isn't for pleasure. In fact he pointed out that his sexual encounters in a monogamous relationship are likely more fulfilling than those of people his age who are permiscuous.

    • @christopherlarsen7788
      @christopherlarsen7788 5 років тому +1

      @@suppeople9987 - That's a remarkably anthropomorphic perspective. But I suspect you are correct.

    • @christopherlarsen7788
      @christopherlarsen7788 5 років тому +3

      @@spidernymph8964 - Agreed. Yes, I caught that part of the video. I suppose I only meant to belabor the point. And to be honest, I think there is much more to be said about how and why monogamous relationships benefit the partners. But for brevity, perhaps it's enough to just recognize the benefit.

    • @virding232
      @virding232 5 років тому +1

      How would you make intercourse not be pleasurable? Feeling pleasure is something that just happens during intercourse unless you have some condition, it isn't something that you have to seek.

  • @juanmanuelsanchezrodriguez6325
    @juanmanuelsanchezrodriguez6325 5 років тому +43

    This is the best video you have ever done. The Holy Spirit was really upon you.

  • @FrDavidC
    @FrDavidC 5 років тому +5

    Thank you so much Brian, you put it so very succinctly and well. Definitely a timely message for the world today! God abundantly bless you, your family, and your work.

  • @zeusssonfire
    @zeusssonfire 5 років тому +14

    ""And that's not constraining at all." BOOM. Really felt your conviction and frustration with the state of things as you said this. Excellent video, sir.

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому

      Yep if only men could control women Jesus would be happy.

  • @marie22tully10
    @marie22tully10 5 років тому +34

    I used to be someone who was very promiscuous. It wasn’t liberating or even really fun, after a point. It was a wrecking ball to my self respect. I’m now coming back to the Church and I’m so grateful I left my old life

    • @marie22tully10
      @marie22tully10 3 роки тому +2

      @Damian Leo Yes. My political views have changed. I lean more conservative now. I should have mentioned that alcohol played a big part in my downward spiral.

    • @andrewstudebaker5397
      @andrewstudebaker5397 3 роки тому +2

      thanks be to God for your reversion and welcome back home!

  • @faustinaobaro4650
    @faustinaobaro4650 4 роки тому +7

    I don't even have words... You've hit so many nails perfectly on the head. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

  • @joelancon7231
    @joelancon7231 5 років тому +39

    I am Libertarian as far as government action I agree with these people but I morally agree with you and i do believe society needs to address the issue

    • @joelancon7231
      @joelancon7231 5 років тому +1

      @Anton Babani idk if your joking or not but what is heretical about it?

    • @Kenfren
      @Kenfren 3 роки тому +1

      Tbf, Libertarianism is just about state action and the political, not the social

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому +1

      @@Kenfren They libertarian always wants big brother the state to enforce his "free market" property rights so its no surprise he wants to keep his women under control.

    • @Kenfren
      @Kenfren 3 роки тому

      @@kimobrien. Libertarians hate the state for violating basic rights by it's existence

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому +1

      @@Kenfren Who will defend Wall Street Private property? Will they just accept it if the workers decide to join a union and strike big companies like Amazon and WalMart?

  • @westonward735
    @westonward735 5 років тому +33

    What a fantastic video. I have a completely new understanding now and a really cool way to help explain the cost of sexual freedom.

    • @westonward735
      @westonward735 3 роки тому

      @Fat Albert I didn't confuse the two, thank you.

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому

      @@westonward735 We really need to hear how good men like Jesus, here in the video, are going to solve all of women's problems. You really care only about the "immortal soul." everything else is discretionary. The bible sets a bad example for human behavior.

    • @westonward735
      @westonward735 3 роки тому +3

      @@kimobrien. The immortal soul is the most important thing. Everything else is secondary.

  • @carissstewart3211
    @carissstewart3211 5 років тому +66

    Monogamy makes life so much easier. Free of a host of diseases; I know exactly who my kids' father is (and i don't have to prove it in court); and neither i nor my husband need feel jealous of or threatened by the other's ex.

    • @sayaretmatkal80
      @sayaretmatkal80 4 роки тому +7

      God bless you woman..stay that way...

    • @thoainguyen2738
      @thoainguyen2738 3 роки тому

      @Fat Albertrelativism is the biggest "one size fits all" garbage, Fat A.

    • @dae1925
      @dae1925 2 роки тому +1

      This here us a woman who will actually progress mankind.

  • @austinbaldwin7836
    @austinbaldwin7836 5 років тому +13

    I was once in this exact position. I was a hardcore believer in individual rights, but at the same time I was also pretty far left and considered myself a communist (Thank god I came over to the right and am now becoming a Christian). I think that this kind of hypocrisy emerges from a kind of self-centeredness, it is "Freedom for me, but not for thee." These kinds of people will fight for their own freedom and liberty, but they will neglect the freedom and liberty of others and ignore the responsibilities that go along with them.

    • @sasi5841
      @sasi5841 5 років тому +1

      M8 that's not freedom, that is power. Too many people confuse power with freedom. But leftists do it on purpose.
      I.e. women's liberation and women's empowerment. They change the wording depending on which crowd they are targeting.

  • @valeriesearles3000
    @valeriesearles3000 5 років тому +7

    You have such a way with words. You come across as very calm, and educated on the topics you speak on.

  • @viccole565
    @viccole565 5 років тому +9

    Wonderful video! Brian, you have wisdom beyond your years. Well done, and please keep it up.

  • @southernbella8503
    @southernbella8503 5 років тому +4

    This was an incredibly wonderfully organized video, Brian. I especially love the food analogy you used...very, very profound and solid argument!

  • @joshejesus1568
    @joshejesus1568 4 роки тому +10

    I was at one point really struggling with this teaching of the Catholic Church, until I found this video of course. Thank you.

  • @TheXone7
    @TheXone7 5 років тому +20

    So well, very well said and presented! God bless you :-)

  • @hugomendez9107
    @hugomendez9107 5 років тому +1

    You are awesome in all your different viewpoints on various topics!

  • @pierrecaron3275
    @pierrecaron3275 5 років тому +4

    I never thought of it this way. This is golden!

  • @YouthMinistryEtc
    @YouthMinistryEtc 5 років тому

    Really appreciate your insight and clear communication in your videos. Thanks for taking on this topic.

  • @LifeasaGift
    @LifeasaGift 4 роки тому +1

    Waw this food/sex analogy with blew my mind. Bravo for both the content and presentation!

  • @joyconnery7481
    @joyconnery7481 5 років тому +12

    How refreshing to hear a modern day young person, even very hip one, who understands God's design for us.

  • @jasmine_milkyflower
    @jasmine_milkyflower 4 роки тому +2

    I am not Catholic but I love your videos. You really helped me with my religious path. I bow to you and your help. Thank you.

  • @carlyt.648
    @carlyt.648 4 роки тому +1

    Just found your page and subscribed. Really, really great video! You have a gift to articulate challenging topics. May God bless you always!

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому

      Its difficult for a priest to explain something he isn't supposed to have.

  • @mo0omo
    @mo0omo 5 років тому +1

    Very well put, Brian.
    Also happy to see your channel growing!

  • @NotAFeminist976
    @NotAFeminist976 5 років тому +2

    Brian, thank you!

  • @martaacosta4415
    @martaacosta4415 5 років тому +7

    All you say is spot on, as always with your videos. There is just one additional point that should be brought up in a discussion of consenting adults doing whatever they want in the privacy of their homes, and that is the victims of these actions. Many would say that if both adults consent, there are no victims. But in adultery, there are the unknowing spouses, the children of divorce. And even if the parties are not married to others, there are the millions upon millions of babies aborted; most of these consenting adults also view abortion as another form of birth control.
    And so consenting adults are really stupid, selfish adults.

  • @a.nash.594
    @a.nash.594 3 роки тому

    My thoughts EXACTLY! I love the analogy with food. Gonna use that in my future UA-cam debates

  • @stevep6318
    @stevep6318 5 років тому +2

    Excellent analogy! Thank you!!!

  • @LOCKi
    @LOCKi 5 років тому +4

    Someone’s been reading their C. S. Lewis! Loved the video!

  • @agentjs09
    @agentjs09 5 років тому +8

    This is pure wisdom.

  • @Undeadsweater
    @Undeadsweater 3 роки тому +6

    I am pro choice, but I appreciate this video. It is extremely frustrating seeing other pro choice people making arguments that completely miss the point.

  • @joan8862
    @joan8862 5 років тому +53

    Once again Brian, you say what I think. Sex is only between a man and a woman within the marital bond. The rest of us must abstain.

    • @joan8862
      @joan8862 5 років тому +10

      @@troig43 Not hard. Stop obsessing about sex and set your mind and body to useful things.

    • @joan8862
      @joan8862 5 років тому +9

      Also, if you believe in God and His commandments, He will give you the grace needed to follow them. But you must pray and develop a relationship to Him.

    • @joan8862
      @joan8862 5 років тому +7

      @@troig43 It's not repression, it's freedom from certain desires. You have fallen for the lie that sex is a need, like air, food and water. It's not. Try fasting from it for a month or more. Give it a shot.

    • @joan8862
      @joan8862 5 років тому +7

      @@troig43 That's hilarious. Society focuses so much on sexuality and people have been led to believe that "their sexuality" is of the utmost importance- it has become their own religion and god. Been there, done that. No thank you.

    • @joan8862
      @joan8862 5 років тому +5

      @@troig43The glorification and deification of sex leads to perversion. The feeding of your sexual desires leads to perversion, duh.

  • @mizuza12
    @mizuza12 5 років тому +3

    Very good point, something to think on. I am liberal in the sense that I don't believe I should force my moral or political values on another. But I do pray that others would be able to experience the full joy and deep trust that marriage offers. I am in no position to judge though. I've been with my husband 22 years but we had kids before we got married 13 years ago . I became a Christian 6 years ago. So I've done it all backwards. I do have to say though that since coming to Christ my marriage has got even better. So while I wish that everyone would respect each other sexually , date, get married have babies, I did it all backwards and have no right to tell another. However , sharing experience , negative and positive is something I can do and then leave others to make up their minds.
    You do this very well, you present an argument and allow people to chew it over. It is my belief that this is far more effective than telling people.
    My only criticism is the bulimia comment. Bulimia is far more complex than eating food for pleasure and throwing it up just so you don't get fat. If you see what a bulimic eats in a binge it has nothing to do with pleasure.

  • @borispenaloza6788
    @borispenaloza6788 4 роки тому +2

    Great point. I appreciate your work. The analogy of food and sex, I read it in CS Lewis. Assuming you read it too, it would have been better if you had quoted him so as to respect the originality of ideas (for those of us who appreciate that and the work you do). God bless you brother and your family.

  • @zygmuntkonstancinski2518
    @zygmuntkonstancinski2518 3 роки тому

    One of the best put arguments for lifetime marriage. Thanks and God bless you.

  • @KATSEYEILLIT3
    @KATSEYEILLIT3 5 років тому +1

    Your videos are improving! I finally subscribed!

  • @savedbychrist504
    @savedbychrist504 5 років тому +1

    Great video. Thank you!!

  • @lisa-im4kv
    @lisa-im4kv 5 років тому +8

    This much like Theology of the Body which I took a course in so I could teach CCD Theology of the Body is a series of lectures given by St. Pope JP II put into a book Beautiful analogy Mr. Holdsworth May Christ keep inspiring you to reach young people.

  • @snowyskylar8821
    @snowyskylar8821 5 років тому +15

    Once I started watching E. Michael Jones, all this suddenly made sense.

  • @aliasreco
    @aliasreco 5 років тому +4

    Thanks Brian. Great message. Happy is he who's sins are forgiven. (Psalm 32) Even happier is he who did not fall into sin.

  • @the-Carpenter
    @the-Carpenter 4 роки тому

    Very insightful, very well laid out with amazing analogies.

  • @tdcarbonel
    @tdcarbonel 3 роки тому

    Always a good argumentation. Thank you.

  • @mhunt7843
    @mhunt7843 3 роки тому

    Wow! I like the way you think and how you articulate your ideas. I subscribed and I look forward to watching more of your channel.

  • @evelynepauley
    @evelynepauley 5 років тому +2

    Great video as always! What song is playing in your intro I really like it?

  • @phiustin
    @phiustin 5 років тому +2

    This was needed to be said in our present times. The problems laid out in this video are the reasons why there is a staggering high demand to legalize abortion worldwide, and why there is a skyrocketing increase in cases of HIV infection and antibiotic-resistant STDs. Thank you for this video, Brian!
    Iesu Christe, Fili Dei, Domine. Miserere nobis peccatoribus.
    Beatæ Mariæ Virginis, Exterminatrix omnium hæresium. Ora pro nobis.
    P.S. I love the Kyrie Eleison background music!

  • @shanebotterill3219
    @shanebotterill3219 5 років тому +4

    I think it’s a bad comparison. We promote - need - laws to give people rights against people in a greater position of power. He expects employees to negotiate on an equal footing with corporations? It’s the same reason teachers can’t have relationships with students, because the power dynamic isn’t equal, even when the student is at the age of consent. It’s why we have age of consent laws at all.
    Is his final position that we should legislate what happens in the bed room? I don’t know what he was aiming at.

    • @sasi5841
      @sasi5841 5 років тому +1

      I think its an all or nothing position. Which I happen to agree with. Either we legislate what goes on in the bedroom or we don't legislate at all. There is no in between. Choosing a middle ground is dishonest.

    • @shanebotterill3219
      @shanebotterill3219 5 років тому

      S asi58 I don’t understand your position. To legislate and outlaw sodomy and or not legislate and say pedophilia is ok? How is having a nuanced approach dishonest?

    • @mosesking2923
      @mosesking2923 4 роки тому

      You don't have a right to equal footing in a power dynamic. Every transaction will have an imbalance of power....get over it. If you want to negotiate with corporations, you can negotiate as a group. If I offer you a job for 5$ and you accept, then that is a consenting transaction. If you don't like it, then quit. Simple.

  • @elsa2660
    @elsa2660 3 роки тому

    I caught the CS Lewis argument and scrolled to see if it was acknowledged and it was! Kudos.

  • @Rosshannah1695
    @Rosshannah1695 3 роки тому

    Excellent video, I remember a few years ago Patrick Swayze was asked about his long happy marriage and why he never cheated... He replied.. Why would I want beef when I can have steak.. A good food analogy, God bless.

  • @barborag4359
    @barborag4359 5 років тому +1

    I love the music in these recent videos. What is it?

    • @alzamiento18
      @alzamiento18 5 років тому

      Barbora O ua-cam.com/video/E8Mf-1A6YtE/v-deo.html

  • @travishall6442
    @travishall6442 7 місяців тому

    The food analogy is the best one

  • @nizzepower
    @nizzepower 5 років тому +1

    God bless you Brian!

  • @presuntomr
    @presuntomr 5 років тому +1

    Really good video and argument! Well done!

  • @cjripley32
    @cjripley32 4 роки тому

    Appreciate the C.S. Lewis reference. This was very thought-provoking.

  • @Vezmus1337
    @Vezmus1337 4 роки тому

    It's sad that something that seems so common sense and obvious needs to be said in today's insane society, but thank you for saying it.

  • @damonnews.
    @damonnews. Рік тому

    Really good video!
    God bless you sir🙏

  • @peterhub1
    @peterhub1 3 роки тому +1

    I desire wisdom, procedure, structure. These things are good, and I will not be ashamed of that. I am enjoying hearing these perspectives

  • @alvindangelo5226
    @alvindangelo5226 4 роки тому

    i cant digest all this truth. you my friend are my inspiration. i hope you don't mind if i borrow your ideas and pass them on to my friends

  • @johnharkness6304
    @johnharkness6304 5 років тому +3

    EXCELLENT Brian👍

  • @ianwilson1518
    @ianwilson1518 5 років тому +6

    0:54 *inner Libertarian howls. Decides to hear you out anyway.

    • @ianwilson1518
      @ianwilson1518 5 років тому

      @Philip-Alexander Jach Or? Sorry, maybe I'm missing the point.

    • @ianwilson1518
      @ianwilson1518 5 років тому

      @Philip-Alexander Jach Well, don't grump at me about it, talk to him!

  • @joshualacertosa5892
    @joshualacertosa5892 4 роки тому

    What's the name of the chant playing in the background?

  • @cindydieball6350
    @cindydieball6350 4 роки тому +3

    God Bless You. Intelligent and filled with the Holy Spirit.

  • @HelenourRigby
    @HelenourRigby 4 роки тому +1

    There are many points that I agree with you. If we stay monogamous and keep with one partner, everything would change but unfortunately in the real world that just isn't the case. Stats show from many different places that in the US, 75% to 90% of people will have pre martial sex. It also doesn't help that we make sex a sin and try to make it to be an evil thing you will go to hell for. Tell teenagers not to do something and it will absolutely backfire on you. Which really the only way to combat this would be the US have a firm sexual education. Lowers pregnancy and STI by a huge margin. And hopefully show young adults the benefits of having one partner.

  • @Waldemarvonanhalt
    @Waldemarvonanhalt 3 роки тому

    Bishop Fulton Sheen also used the food and appetite analogy regarding sex.

  • @hannahraw1958
    @hannahraw1958 3 роки тому

    This is excellent

  • @rdabdao3535
    @rdabdao3535 3 роки тому

    Amazing message :)

  • @gustavo_jose2
    @gustavo_jose2 3 роки тому

    man AWESOME video

  • @CristinaaaMx
    @CristinaaaMx 5 років тому +6

    TODAYS SOCIETY NEEDS SO MUCH OF GOD... THANK U FOR THE VIDEO MY FRIEND!
    GOD BLESS HIS ONE AND ONLY CATHOLIC CHURCH :)

  • @berniejii3739
    @berniejii3739 5 років тому +3

    I believe in free trade and consenting acts between adults as far as law is concerned. But I believe monogamy is the most stable and best hope for children and society in general. Let's get there with persuasion and example rather than force.

    • @sasi5841
      @sasi5841 5 років тому +1

      There are four thing that guides human actions and those also affect each other.
      1. Biology
      2. Culture
      3. Economics
      4. Law
      Guiding behaviors by changing number 2 is the least tyrannical way to do things

    • @mosesking2923
      @mosesking2923 4 роки тому

      @@sasi5841 You are assuming tyranny is a bad thing....it is not. The stability of a society is FAR more important than some subjective sense of freedom. Make the US government pass laws which make abortion illegal by death penalty, and ban contraception. Also, put adulterers in prison and jail anyone who cheats on their spouse. Society would improve overnight.

  • @mariusfilip1847
    @mariusfilip1847 5 років тому +3

    Brian, your capacity to mix up categories is absolutely astonishing.
    Your analogies (with blaming the money lenders for the economic crisis or with regulating the minimum wage) overlook a very important detail: the "free" partners in those cases are *widely* unequal. Regulation is absolutely a must because otherwise the powerful side takes advantage of the weak side who "consents" because the choices in their case are wildly reduced compared to the other's.
    The analogy with food is in the same vein: the biggest danger in overeating is obesity, diabetes and heart-disease - clear, palpable medical conditions and not the sin of "enjoying too much".
    Hardly the case of what's going on in the bedroom where - assuming the situation of fully consenting adults of comparable maturity who know what they are doing - no blatant unequality is in exercise and no physical harm takes place.
    You end the case well, though: sexual fidelity because it is an expression of love - love which by its very nature can't be built but with one single partner, consistently, constantly, for life.
    I believe you should have started with that and stayed there. Trying to find analogies with "real world" scenarios and expose real world "pros and cons" is a dead route because the premises of the "real world" are crooked to start with.

    • @ingridsantos7815
      @ingridsantos7815 3 роки тому +1

      Analogies don't have to equate different events but getting a point for human understanding. Sins aren't abstract things from a Christian perspective. And sex can lead to sexual deseases, pregnancy and psicological attachment. That's why he lists nutritional medical implications. Nice try making a strawman

  • @chrisselph2674
    @chrisselph2674 4 роки тому

    Excellent analysis I see you’ve been reading CS Lewis a great source for effective analogies! Should he get a little credit for that?

  • @OldSchool1947
    @OldSchool1947 4 роки тому

    Hilarious images there!

  • @davidjones-wy3ln
    @davidjones-wy3ln 4 роки тому +3

    this is interesting but minimum wage laws and sexual consent are substantially different

  • @richardbenitez7803
    @richardbenitez7803 5 років тому +7

    I remember you showing us a picture of your 8 kids and they all looked exactly like you.

  • @PockASqueeno
    @PockASqueeno 3 роки тому +2

    Very well said. Your comparison to nutrition is something that actually is becoming perverted now in the same way sex was in the 1960s. Look at the “fat acceptance” movement happening now. They use the same logic.

  • @nursingninja
    @nursingninja 4 роки тому

    That food analogy was perfect

  • @SeezSantos
    @SeezSantos 5 років тому

    Great video!

  • @bobafetttea
    @bobafetttea 3 роки тому

    Brilliantly put.. That's all I can say about it.

  • @agirrium
    @agirrium 4 роки тому +1

    Given the massive amount of common sense in these videos, I would love to see one concerning premarital sexuality, especially for couples in serious relationships.

    • @daddycool228
      @daddycool228 3 роки тому

      Fir those in serious relationship (whatever that means) maybe they should het married

  • @konarocky
    @konarocky 3 роки тому

    Excellent video.

  • @shao7620
    @shao7620 4 роки тому +2

    You are missing the point. The point is exactly that the power imbalance between employer and employee can create a situation where there is no consent and regulations aim to balance the field(whether they actually do that is another question). The employer has much bigger leverage in that relationship so much so that he can just dictate wages. Romantic relationships are regulated in the same way like having relationships with minors or having relationships with employees(depending on where you live)

  • @QuTeBug
    @QuTeBug 5 років тому

    Wonderful...

  • @carlgregory6910
    @carlgregory6910 3 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @michelelewis4738
    @michelelewis4738 4 роки тому +3

    When it comes to many moral issues, we tend to cite the religious "rules" in hopes of convincing non religious people of the rightness of our argument. It usually does not work. I very much appreciate how you use logic and natural consequences to clearly point out the errors of our society's relativeistic thinking. I believer you have the gift of wisdom.

  • @mitchmueller6006
    @mitchmueller6006 5 років тому +5

    CS Lewis said the same things. Though I can't remember where...

  • @abhishekjoseph4198
    @abhishekjoseph4198 5 років тому +1

    As always Brian.
    WOW

  • @annewalter5024
    @annewalter5024 5 років тому +2

    Common sense.
    Unfortunately, many without it think they have it.

    • @kimobrien.
      @kimobrien. 3 роки тому

      Like the guy who plays the Jesus in the video? Sex feels good. Catholic Priests shouldn't actually experience it though. That's what makes them such experts on the subject. The really important thing isn't life its saving the "Immortal soul" from an afterlife of "eternal damnation". You know the hellfire? Right!!!

  • @realebogakgobokoe468
    @realebogakgobokoe468 4 роки тому

    Spot on!

  • @juanmanuelsanchezrodriguez6325
    @juanmanuelsanchezrodriguez6325 5 років тому

    1:51 why did you put Colombian expresident Uribe in the video? Lol

  • @SanteLiberatore
    @SanteLiberatore 3 роки тому

    You are a Godsend.

  • @lbdeuce
    @lbdeuce 3 роки тому

    The protagonist from the critically acclaimed 1985 movie “Mask,” totally stole my nutrition analogy. Think for you’re self Rocky Dennis, protagonist from the movie “Mask”

  • @billsd13
    @billsd13 5 років тому +4

    Very philosophically ept, in my humble opinion.

  • @MojoPin1983
    @MojoPin1983 5 років тому +3

    Excellent insights, as always. You provided many excellent points to ruminate about. I like the striptease analogy, with respect to food, that you borrowed from C.S. Lewis’, Mere Christianity.

  • @Wyatt1333
    @Wyatt1333 3 роки тому

    Not sure I get the analogy. Can someone explain? I'm confused on how eating and having sex are the same/similar? I think he's losing me because everyone has to eat otherwise we die. We don't have to have sex, otherwise all virgins (and some married people) would be dead.