Zelensky got together with Trump in Florida before the election as a sign of respect should Trump somehow get re-elected. This was a very intuitive and wise move by Zelensky and Trump did not forget this gesture.
Trump is a wholly owned Putin asset. Watch what he does, not what he says. So far he has never stood up to Russia, and is still threatening our allies. If that changes, good. But I'll only believe it when I see it.
trump is controlled by putin. trump loathes President Zelensky because President Zelensky is a far better person than trump, always has been and always will be. trump will try to bring President Zelensky down, make him grovel. trump's
Yeah the media was all over Zelenskyy for doing that but I thought it was a good move. There is no human in earth who holds a grudge longer than tr*mp. He’s intensely petty and vindictive. But I don’t think we should underestimate Zelenskyy- he can match wits with vastly smarter men.
USA can help Europe with Ukraine and Europe can help USA with Taiwan. Europe will also keep increasing military spending naturally in response to the Russian threat. NATO can definitely become stronger from this period if we all do our fair share. If we stick together the Russian economy will spiral down and China will have to calm down with a united NATO standing behind Taiwan, Japan and South Korea
I'm no geopolitical expert, but it seems that straightforward to me as well. We're all better off if Russia gets humbled in Ukraine and China chills out on Taiwan ambitions.
Uh, how about Europe take care of the Red Sea and the US can send its ships from the Red Sea to the Pacific? One little problem -- Europe can't spare the forces to send to the Red Sea... And you'd have to at least 4x that to be of much help vs. China.
Trump will do what he wants ,he hasn't got a grasp of how Europe rolls , the problem is he is an egotistical narcissist ,the only good thing about Trump is he is old and the draft dodger won't be around for too long
Europe already pays the price for americas army... in refugees and migrants that you create and we have to take in.... without that maybe they could up spending...
"I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelenskyy as president-elect before I take office on January 20th. I’ll have that war settled." Trump - June 28, 2024. You got 22 days homie, chop chop
As an Englishman looking on I have to say that Trumps decision to invite Musk into his cabinet was always going to cause problems. The novelty appears to have warn off before Trumps even taken office, Musk isn't a politician but he is the richest guy on the planet and he was never going to be satisfied in the roll of Trumps wing man.
I could not believe my ears, the journalist being interviewed suggested that the Trump idea about purchasing Greenland 🇬🇱 is not that crazy! The idea is as PM Mette Frederiksen, Denmark 🇩🇰 has already told Trump “absurd” and fortunately “belonging in a bygone age”. Along the same line both the former and the present head of government in Greenland have stated that Greenland is not for sale. Now Trump of course had a hard time handling this. But the matter ends here, he may kick and scream and misbehave, but it will change nothing and the idea will stay crazy and absurd 👍
Some say everything is for sale. Make me an offer I can't refuse. 😀 I don't know much about this issue, but it sounds like if Greenland doesn't play ball with the US they could wind up under the thumb of Russia and/or China.
heis from the "National Review". he is not a journalist. they do not report news. they spread propaganda in exchange for money from billionaires trying to push an agenda. they do it for profit. real news organizations lose money when they do their job correctly. garbage like the national review, tim poole, etc, take money from anyone, chinese, russians, oil companies, gun lobbies, zionist groups, etc. to spread lies.
@@anthonydewitt7674 Why would Trump care if people don’t want to be part of the empire. The Rhineland, Austria, The Sudetenland sound familiar? Today it is Greenland, Panama, and Canada. It makes sense if Trump wants to emulate another populist from the 1930s. All Trump has to do is occupy Greenland and it’s off to appeasement races again.
Probably he will settle for US bases in Greenland. And actually I think China is trying to buy up Greenland territory in a subversive manner so Greenland may come round to the idea of US bases.
Musk tanked the spending bill because of the clause that would require American companies to reduce their involvement with China in high-tech areas , ie musks busnesses in china .
Trump can be relied upon to change direction 180 ̊ at intervals of about 8 hours. Possibly every 4 hours, depending on whom happens to visit and talk to him.
Totally. It’s one of the few things I agree with tr*mp about. The European countries have been using NATO as a replacement for their own internal military spending, which it was never designed to do. America can’t be single-handedly responsible for all of our allies’ security needs. They need to step up to the plate.
23 European member states have achieved the 2% of GDP spend. The slackers are Canada at 1.4%, Spain, Portugal, Italy , Belgium , Luxembourg, Slovenia, Croatia. The US has reduced its % down to 2.7% of GDP in 2024, the lowest ever since before WW2.
i think its fair that the US asks europe to do more as its their war after all. another point to remember it will be a better deterent for future attcks on europe if they can do their bidding with less help from the US.
I'm from Europe, Germany. And yes, I think it's fair, and he had a point about it for a very long time already. This war is and should be mainly Europa's concern, and we need to step up and produce more weapons and ammunition. Hopefully this will change with a new German government and chancellor next year. But USA signed the Budapest memorandum, Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons in exchange for security helps from the USA, UK and Russia. As Russia is the attacker, it is in the interest of the USA to fulfill its promise to help Ukraine, together with its partners.
I for one am no fan of Trump. HOWEVER, I do agree with him on the issue of European countries failing to meet their defence spending obligations. Many European countries seem to have forgotten or just decided to ignore the wisdom that you maintain peace by being prepared for war. Russia would not be acting in such a belligerent way if Europe had robust independent defence capabilities. European nations have neglected their own defence for decades on the assumption that 1) post-cold war there are no enemies to fight in conventional wars, 2) if 1 is wrong the US will always have our backs. This is flawed thinking of the highest level and has left Europe badly exposed. European countries have begun to increase spending, however there are still many countries that think they can get a free ride. Additionally, I think one of the big issues for the Euro countries is a lack of central cohesion. Russia sees this as a biiiiiig weakness because it takes the Euro countries forever to agree on how to respond to unfolding threats which allows Russia to take the initiative. I really do think that NATO should have taken a far more pro-active stance with Ukraine. We've allowed Russia to dictate terms from day one this has left us constantly tying ourselves in knots trying to agree on a response whilst Russia is already making its next 2 moves. I really do think that it is in the USA's interest to ensure that Ukraine wins this war and that Russia pays a high price. There seems to be a growing view in the US that Russia is not a threat, can be trusted and was forced into this war by NATO. This is simply mindless parroting of Kremlin manufactured falsehoods and needs to be confronted. Russia CANNOT and should not be trusted and should be treated in the same way as Iran and be regarded as a pariah on the world stage. Russia sees the US as its enemy, it sees the world that the USA created after WW2 as something to be torn down and replaced, and it sees its war in Ukraine as a key step in achieving that objective. Why? Because if Russia is allowed to get away with marching into Ukraine and stealing 25% of its land by force then it shows every other despot and authoritarian regime out there that they can do the same without any serious repercussion from the custodians of the global rules based order (The USA, Canada, UK, EU, Japan, Australia, etc)
@@smithb0134 Okay, Ivan: The 2017 2 trillion dollar unfunded tax break that Trump signed was the largest single debt in world history. Almost all of that money went to billionaires. In 2018, Trump did not pay one penny in USA tax
@alfredneuman6911 Oh Bernie, You're so full of yourself. Why do you care so much what other people pay in taxes? Why don't you concentrate on your own taxes. Are you paying enough? And you're crying over 2 trillion? Well, what about the 164 Trullion in unfunded mandates created by Democrats?
didnt 90% of famous rich people come out against trump? you had an entire campagne where the rich and famous where telling people that trump will destroy america. but im sure all those rich and famous people did that in support of the poor.
@@weedling3552 depends on what you mean by "famous rich." Celebrities and Hollywood have always supported the Dems. The C-Suite Fortune 500 execs have always supported the Republicans. Is the CFO of say JP Morgan Chase famous? No. But he's just as wealthy as some TV personality or movie star, and I'd argue more powerful because that opinion will affect policy, whereas the movie star's opinion literally does not matter for policy.
You still believe the BS liberal media provides you. The truth is out, even Harris knew she was not going to win according to her staff and her own internal polling.
3 дні тому+1
You think projecting incoherent, unpredictable irrationality doesn't have it's uses?
By stating an intention to absorb Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal for US security, he just validated Putin’s war on Ukraine. No amount of labelling it irrationality erases that.
It's laughable that this fellow thinks what is going on resembles anything like a republican government. He sounds like one of those people who likes to interpret what trump means rather than what he says .
On the contrarty, tariffs reduce trade and often backfire. As an example, the US put a volume limit on Japanese cars in 1981. The Japanese responded by creating the luxury cars Lexus, Infinity, etc. Boomerang, as Putin likes to say. The correct response to foreign competition is to make better products at home.
It is genius because it’s forcing them to get rid of their tyrant leaders and in a month or two they will happily comply fighting their borders and selling the US fertilizer.
Supporting Ukraine is the only sensible thing to do. That’s why it’s surprising to see Trump with a turnabout on this. He usually does the opposite of what’s right.
Oh, it’s just gonna be so funny all the smooth Brain people screaming about sending money to Ukraine when they realize Trump is just gonna do the same thing.
The fact that this commentator says that "buying" Greenland is not crazy just shows how ignorant he is, while pretending to be knowledgeable. Denmark has recognized in law, that the people of Greenland are a nation with the right to self-determination under international law. In other words, Greenland is "owned" by Greenland in the same way that Denmark-proper is "owned" by the King of Denmark, i.e. it may state "Denmark" as the sovereign state, but the national sovereignty lies with the people of Greenland. Denmark can no more sell Greenland to the US than we could sell Norway to the US, it is not ours to sell. It seems to be a chronic inability for Americans to just do the bare minimum of study before talking nonsense and making absolute donkeys of themselves!
@@gregoryadair3223 Your English reading comprehension is certainly lacking, but you yourselves admit that with all your complaints about the American public school system, because I specifically said that THE COMMENTATOR was ignorant, and that it seems that Americans have an inability to study an issue BEFORE talking about it, rather than just pretending they are informed without actually being informed. This is in no way inconsistent with Americans being very capable in other fields and areas, however being an award-winning physicist, like Stephen Hawking, does not equal being knowledgeable about Danish law or history. Again, I can only assume that this is your English-language skills being lacking because my message was very specific in this regard.
It can be done. Mostly by remembering what it has been like to be out in the wilderness for the last 4 years. BTW, the GOP will hopefully pick up a couple of seats when special elections are held to replace cabinet appointees.
@ well there’s no unifying principles or mission other than to follow scumbag con artist Trump off a cliff. And flip over the chessboard The Democrats are actually interested in running the country, like adults
@ you’re dreaming, nowhere but straight down from here, just look at the chaos This imbecile isn’t even in the White House yet GOP will be crushed in midterms
Indeed. Europeans must recognize that a large portion of the US population is sick of militarily carrying them on their back and must adjust accordingly.
@LunaticTheCat to be fair. The US hasn't had to single handedly "carry Europe on their back". Europe hasn't actually needed the United States directly involved in any wars to its defense. The US however, demanded European support in Afghanistan, and wanted it in Iraq too.
Well, it would take decades, because the entire force structure, equipment, and capabilities of most European nations supplements US military power. Theyre a force multiplier. However, they don't have the capabilities to stand alone. Whether that is naval, air power, logistics, air lift, power projection, equipment, etc. There are some nations like France and the UK that do have global power projection, but again that is very limited, and also serves to basically supplement US power (like France in West Africa or the UK in the Indo-Pacific).
He can do that if he wants to. Meaning All American values mean nothing, right? Suggestions of how people should philosophically approach their job as president of all Americans are now simply garbage of the past according to this commenter
…wishful thinking. Trump admin is filled to the brim with transactional, fair weather friends. I wouldn’t depend on a coherent strategy. We are now for sale to the highest bidder. F’ tomorrow. The new strategy is now “what is in it for me today”.
If you told my younger self I'd be relieved to hear someone say the new administration may have something like "a coherent Republican foreign policy", I'd have said you were crazy
It's no more a mandate than his previous win, or Biden's win. This is how many elections have been since 2000. It's a shame they won't work on things they can agree on instead of trying to be d..ks to the other side.
I was in Britain last year and told my hosts (to their apparent disbelief) that the Trump movement is a cult, and is fascistic. Unfortunately i made a bet that Trump would lose the election, so there is a man in the West Midlands to whom i owe ten bucks. But the part about fascism, I was right about that.
The debt ceiling doesn’t prevent runaway spending-it’s merely an arbitrary number that forces negotiations at fixed intervals. Its primary purpose is political, not economic, and it’s disconnected from the real drivers of fiscal health, like economic growth or inflation. Debt grows naturally with inflation and economic expansion, so the ceiling must always be raised. Removing it could streamline efforts to reduce unnecessary spending by eliminating this artificial hurdle and focusing on meaningful fiscal reform instead of political brinkmanship.
One of these days the clock will run out. How much, per year, is spent on debt maintenance? And what percentage of GDP is it? I am not a yank so care very little of these numbers. But one day the US will either be forced to start servicing this debt or declare bankrupt. You cant print your way out of debt.
@@12345patbet The point is that guard rail doesn't prevent what it is said to guard against and never will. I think the intentions were legitimate and well placed, but the reality has proven quite different. This the the reason that there has been talk of "minting the coin". The fact that was even possible got me thinking and researching the topic.
@ he did not get the landslide win he claims he did. Essentially it was 50/50 on the popular vote. 1.5 points is not a mandate. Half of the country think he’s unfit.
He only wanted their votes, now he's won the election they're of secondary importance. Let's see how the clown show does by the mid-terms and whether they'll support him.
Also Europe should get its gas from US: more jobs there and it helps to weaken Mordor's economy and guarantees Europe isn't dependent on Mordor anymore.
I think Greenland will not like to be under American healthcare! They will prefer what they have right now and they will later persue their independence from Denmark too.
As if we haven't had plenty of clownish buffoonery the last four years.
День тому
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i Trump is a licensed clown as part of his performance in WWE events, according to the New York circus commission.
День тому
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i I still cannot wrap my brain around why, even after 9 years of this, there are still people who think the whiniest and most fragile crybaby on Earth is admirable.
I think Clinton combined it with the budget, got a surplus, then Bush gave it away to the rich with tax cuts. Now Trump will give the rich tax cuts and there won't be the money. Get ready to go back to work.
I don't understand this logic by some cost cutters. Social security is the largest govt expenditure but income tax makes up over half of govt intake. Reducing immigration will reduce a lot of dollars leaving the US(which imo isn't that harmful because the dollar is a globally recognized reserve currency), but I think more help would be raising the tide of the economy, therefore incomes, and therefore govt intake. Cutting household spending is essential, but at some point you must increase household income.
@@nunyabusiness863 No, Ivan. As another poster said, Social Security is funded directly by citizens for every paycheck. It is not funded by taxes one a year.
how do you think the federal budget is financed? its from taxes, so what are you even talking about? all of the federal budget "comes out your check", so does all government spending. (i dont actually think you pay high taxes, coz you dumb)
It's both. It's just another tax. It's delusional to pretend that specific tax dollars are earmarked for specific purposes. It doesn't work that way, it's just an accounting fiction. The reality is that money is fungible. The only thing that causes the government to honor commitments such as Social Security is the integrity of elected officials. And in the case of Social Security, those weasels have been looting the fund for a couple generations to pay for their boondoggles and tax giveaways to the rich. And then they screech that the fund is insolvent after they took the money out.
All Americans are very LOUD when it comes to our bread and butter all Americans I just wanna make that very clear left right green yellow blue. We’re all very very loud when it comes to our money.
Russia is not a near peer competitor, it is a Third World country with snow, a Third World European country, which is a rare thing these days, its army isn't any good and it has bad weapons, it has a few nukes, but then so does India and China, and unlike China, Russia is not an industrial powerhouse, it exports few things besides natural resources!
So Trump will pick a fight with the Left over immigration provocations, while also ditching the Far Right (though Trump will try to string them along with his Left provocations). Times Radio seems content with this prospect, but doesn't consider the likelihood of a recession in the US in the next 2 years. Not a repeat of 2016-20!
President Roosevelt could have said to Churchill :" UK and France should have spent more money for their defence". Probably a right analysis, but does not help in the current situation.🤣
He will surely find out. I am delighted to see Trump's cult attacking President Musk, and happy to watch Elon melt down. We've had few good days, finally.
What this man says boils down to Trump is an idiot throwing out jibberish at random, nobody takes his serious. Americans know this is only a loud mouth and don’t pay a lot of attention. So then the big question is: why elect the guy?
@@StillAliveAndKicking_ you are probably right. I am European. My question was genuine. Why would you elect somebody of whom you know he is bsing and cannot deliver 90% of his promises. So please educate me what is the rationale here.
@@SybilleGrob I know plenty of British people and some North Americans who admire Trump. He is seen as anti - woke, and they point to his never starting a war which is true, and the economic growth under Trump, which is true I think, but that may owe more to predecessors and luck. Biden had covid, which was bad luck and damaged the economy. Trump talks simple language, in simple terms, with simple solutions. They like that. And don’t forget that Harris often talked gibberish, she did not have a good record, and she promoted some extreme woke ideologies. Having a man pretending to be a woman in a senior government role would alienate a lot of Americans. Personally I think Trump is dangerous, he has a 5 minute attention span if that, he was found guilty of sexual assult and fraud, a nasty piece of work.
I reckon Trump is pleased to have Musk in the public eye. When the SHTF he can push Musk under the bus and most of the citizenry will agree. Put the worst case forward then back off and look good.
Trump doesn't shift. That implies he has a firm grasp in reality and adjusts his thinking accordingly. What he really does is lurch back and forth. MAGA appreciates the simplicity
With the American military-industrial complex potentially losing billions in contracts (Musk, notwithstanding), the not-so-rhetorical-question is asked of "king Tr***": can you really afford to lose the war in Ukraine? (or, can he afford NATO/EU winning without him??)
From information on international sites, the US does NOT spend even 2% of GDP themselves for NATO. It's less than 1% as of right now according to the financial information. Asking other NATO members to spend more than America does seems a bit hypocritical.
The US spends 3.5% officially, and it is really closer to 4%. The only other NATO country doing that is Poland. The US was footing about 70% of Europe's security costs for as long as I can remember; US taxpayers have been spending more than the rest of the Alliance for 80 years. We don't actually like this situation. I am anti-Trump, but he is right about this point and 100% of Americans predictably agree about redistributing the burden. This has been the position of every US president since Truman, Trump did not in vent it.. Saying "5%" is an obvious attempt to get to 3.5, which is perfectly reasonable and overdue, not hypocrisy.
The US govt spends too much on health for too little return. Efficiency should focus on getting the system right and stopping corporate gouging, not cutting back on services.
@@rommeo27 BS, that is not the reason Trump says drill daddy drill or whatever. Putin and Trump are in cahoots, Trump is certainly not out to get Putin.😂 Trump, is helping Zelenskyy, overthrow Putin, the story goes, all fake. Trump just says "Drill everywhere, muaaa haaa haaaaa..."👹 because it sounds tough, and ruthless, and savage, making the creepy & criminal minded Maga drool. 🤤 I am all for decreasing America's dependence upon foreign oil but Trump is just mouthing off again.
Even trump.might fall in line with G.O.P on certain things..with trumpian changes, and enhancements. Alen Musk for instance doesn't have presidential information like trump.mow does..Musk still.is saposedly focused on mars..
Whether they are vocal or not doesn't mean they do not want to cull migration, see the trends throughout Europe and those voices are likely to get louder.
Take the win Donald. Stop Russia before they go on thru Belarus to the Baltic States. And Finland. Asaad's gone, Russia and Iran are set back big time. Take the win Donald. Make Europe pay for their defense. Don't blow it.
What the people remember is from 2016 to 2020 everything was lower not just in America but in the world and that’s what the voters remember and it will start with energy prices. Everything else will come down after that, but it won’t happen overnight but it will happen.
@@wayman1776 Prices are never going back to 2016 figures. It never happens, short of a depression. Prices adjusted for inflation might come down, but the raw numbers won't.
Stop covering US politics. It should be clear given your "analysis" in the last few years that you have zero clue. Your commentary is essentially at the level of the BBC's.
@@jonnys13-g9t If you had said "point out" rather than "point on", you would sound more like someone whose native language is English. You should also have said "my own media's bs" rather than "my own media bs". Take a break and have a glass of tea.
Trump thinks he can buy Greenland from Denmark, he has no clue! Denmark cant sell Greenland, they have partial autonomy! Trump can ask Greenland to declare full independence, and then ask them to be Americans or invade 😂😂😂
Zelensky got together with Trump in Florida before the election as a sign of respect should Trump somehow get re-elected. This was a very intuitive and wise move by Zelensky and Trump did not forget this gesture.
Trump is a wholly owned Putin asset. Watch what he does, not what he says. So far he has never stood up to Russia, and is still threatening our allies. If that changes, good. But I'll only believe it when I see it.
trump is controlled by putin. trump loathes President Zelensky because President Zelensky is a far better person than trump, always has been and always will be. trump will try to bring President Zelensky down, make him grovel. trump's
Yeah the media was all over Zelenskyy for doing that but I thought it was a good move. There is no human in earth who holds a grudge longer than tr*mp. He’s intensely petty and vindictive. But I don’t think we should underestimate Zelenskyy- he can match wits with vastly smarter men.
lol you may be dissapointed soon
@@matthewnewton8812 What tripe you spew.
USA can help Europe with Ukraine and Europe can help USA with Taiwan. Europe will also keep increasing military spending naturally in response to the Russian threat. NATO can definitely become stronger from this period if we all do our fair share. If we stick together the Russian economy will spiral down and China will have to calm down with a united NATO standing behind Taiwan, Japan and South Korea
- Someone sane...
- How akward!
Nice for a change.
😊
( Sweden )
I'm no geopolitical expert, but it seems that straightforward to me as well. We're all better off if Russia gets humbled in Ukraine and China chills out on Taiwan ambitions.
There is not much logic in your statement
Because it does ignore some political and economic facts .Even some military details
Uh, how about Europe take care of the Red Sea and the US can send its ships from the Red Sea to the Pacific? One little problem -- Europe can't spare the forces to send to the Red Sea... And you'd have to at least 4x that to be of much help vs. China.
Trump will do what he wants ,he hasn't got a grasp of how Europe rolls , the problem is he is an egotistical narcissist ,the only good thing about Trump is he is old and the draft dodger won't be around for too long
Europe should pay more for NATO defense, but USA should never desert Europe.
Europe already pays the price for americas army... in refugees and migrants that you create and we have to take in.... without that maybe they could up spending...
Europe already pays more. Your Army pensions are included in your contribution . Ours aren't. Pipe down Yank
EU and USA do better together
Yup.
or we’ll be dealing with Brexit 2: American Boogaloo
"I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelenskyy as president-elect before I take office on January 20th. I’ll have that war settled." Trump - June 28, 2024.
You got 22 days homie, chop chop
Lol
👏🏻😄👏🏻
Yeah, just because he's lied 30,000 times before, why assume he's lying now?
The real question is why didn't slow Joe make any attempts to stop it, instead sending billions to escalate it.
@@hummer222slow and joe do rhyme, that’s so clever, you must really know your stuff.
As an Englishman looking on I have to say that Trumps decision to invite Musk into his cabinet was always going to cause problems. The novelty appears to have warn off before Trumps even taken office, Musk isn't a politician but he is the richest guy on the planet and he was never going to be satisfied in the roll of Trumps wing man.
I could not believe my ears, the journalist being interviewed suggested that the Trump idea about purchasing Greenland 🇬🇱 is not that crazy! The idea is as PM Mette Frederiksen, Denmark 🇩🇰 has already told Trump “absurd” and fortunately “belonging in a bygone age”. Along the same line both the former and the present head of government in Greenland have stated that Greenland is not for sale. Now Trump of course had a hard time handling this. But the matter ends here, he may kick and scream and misbehave, but it will change nothing and the idea will stay crazy and absurd 👍
Some say everything is for sale. Make me an offer I can't refuse. 😀 I don't know much about this issue, but it sounds like if Greenland doesn't play ball with the US they could wind up under the thumb of Russia and/or China.
heis from the "National Review". he is not a journalist. they do not report news. they spread propaganda in exchange for money from billionaires trying to push an agenda. they do it for profit. real news organizations lose money when they do their job correctly. garbage like the national review, tim poole, etc, take money from anyone, chinese, russians, oil companies, gun lobbies, zionist groups, etc. to spread lies.
@@hymns4ever197 no greenland is nato like denmark.
@@anthonydewitt7674 Why would Trump care if people don’t want to be part of the empire. The Rhineland, Austria, The Sudetenland sound familiar? Today it is Greenland, Panama, and Canada. It makes sense if Trump wants to emulate another populist from the 1930s. All Trump has to do is occupy Greenland and it’s off to appeasement races again.
Probably he will settle for US bases in Greenland. And actually I think China is trying to buy up Greenland territory in a subversive manner so Greenland may come round to the idea of US bases.
Musk tanked the spending bill because of the clause that would require American companies to reduce their involvement with China in high-tech areas , ie musks busnesses in china .
It Figures! Muskrat is only for himself.
Trump can be relied upon to change direction 180 ̊ at intervals of about 8 hours. Possibly every 4 hours, depending on whom happens to visit and talk to him.
Jeopardy: What does Donald Trump have in common with European long distance trains?
No introduction as to who this guest is. Please provide introductory details as to the bona fides of your guests.
Yes, listening to him indicates that he is working for the Project2025 team.
Noah Rothman, the author of 'Unjust'. I had the same question, so I looked up the book prominently displayed in the background.
you actually care who they drag in front of the camera to read the lines?
When I first saw him, I thought he was a Donald Trump, Jr. impersonator, but then he started speaking in a serious manner without sniffling.
@@PeterMoss54321😂
Replace Federal employees with loyalists? You mean fealty.
You mean incompetent employees showing fealty.
The Spoils System. One of the worst features of the first gilded age.
Leading to state capture, and the same program of culling non-loyal military generals. It is extraordinarily dangerous. This guy is out to lunch.
@@futatorius exactly. its just history repeating itself. this is why civics literacy and history are so important.
@@sw6118 You wouldn't know competence if it bit you, Biden supporter. The poster boy of incompetence.
Allies need to get more serious about defence spending. That would be a huge benefit to the world.
Totally. It’s one of the few things I agree with tr*mp about. The European countries have been using NATO as a replacement for their own internal military spending, which it was never designed to do. America can’t be single-handedly responsible for all of our allies’ security needs. They need to step up to the plate.
23 European member states have achieved the 2% of GDP spend. The slackers are Canada at 1.4%, Spain, Portugal, Italy , Belgium , Luxembourg, Slovenia, Croatia. The US has reduced its % down to 2.7% of GDP in 2024, the lowest ever since before WW2.
Spending or results? Governments can spend infinite money on no results.
I hope trump does help Ukraine but we Britain and EU need to up are game to atleast 3.5,
i think its fair that the US asks europe to do more as its their war after all. another point to remember it will be a better deterent for future attcks on europe if they can do their bidding with less help from the US.
I'm from Europe, Germany. And yes, I think it's fair, and he had a point about it for a very long time already. This war is and should be mainly Europa's concern, and we need to step up and produce more weapons and ammunition. Hopefully this will change with a new German government and chancellor next year. But USA signed the Budapest memorandum, Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons in exchange for security helps from the USA, UK and Russia. As Russia is the attacker, it is in the interest of the USA to fulfill its promise to help Ukraine, together with its partners.
I for one am no fan of Trump. HOWEVER, I do agree with him on the issue of European countries failing to meet their defence spending obligations. Many European countries seem to have forgotten or just decided to ignore the wisdom that you maintain peace by being prepared for war. Russia would not be acting in such a belligerent way if Europe had robust independent defence capabilities.
European nations have neglected their own defence for decades on the assumption that 1) post-cold war there are no enemies to fight in conventional wars, 2) if 1 is wrong the US will always have our backs. This is flawed thinking of the highest level and has left Europe badly exposed.
European countries have begun to increase spending, however there are still many countries that think they can get a free ride.
Additionally, I think one of the big issues for the Euro countries is a lack of central cohesion. Russia sees this as a biiiiiig weakness because it takes the Euro countries forever to agree on how to respond to unfolding threats which allows Russia to take the initiative.
I really do think that NATO should have taken a far more pro-active stance with Ukraine. We've allowed Russia to dictate terms from day one this has left us constantly tying ourselves in knots trying to agree on a response whilst Russia is already making its next 2 moves.
I really do think that it is in the USA's interest to ensure that Ukraine wins this war and that Russia pays a high price. There seems to be a growing view in the US that Russia is not a threat, can be trusted and was forced into this war by NATO. This is simply mindless parroting of Kremlin manufactured falsehoods and needs to be confronted. Russia CANNOT and should not be trusted and should be treated in the same way as Iran and be regarded as a pariah on the world stage. Russia sees the US as its enemy, it sees the world that the USA created after WW2 as something to be torn down and replaced, and it sees its war in Ukraine as a key step in achieving that objective. Why? Because if Russia is allowed to get away with marching into Ukraine and stealing 25% of its land by force then it shows every other despot and authoritarian regime out there that they can do the same without any serious repercussion from the custodians of the global rules based order (The USA, Canada, UK, EU, Japan, Australia, etc)
Right, relying on other countries makes any country appear weak.
How impressive?
Enemies will shiver with fear...upon you
De-Escalation treat!
( Sweden )
@@hoaxheaven
Conquer & Divide allies...
Make YOU weak!
>>> SUPPRICED?
Stock up on popcorn, people......
I bet all Zelensky had to say was “hi would love to do a photo shoot with you”
Experienced?
Oh come on! They're going to offer maximalist goals for the rich! And that's all
Oh come on, we're so bored of this "get the rich" shtick. At least be original.
@@smithb0134 Okay, Ivan: The 2017 2 trillion dollar unfunded tax break that Trump signed was the largest single debt in world history. Almost all of that money went to billionaires. In 2018, Trump did not pay one penny in USA tax
@alfredneuman6911
Oh Bernie, You're so full of yourself. Why do you care so much what other people pay in taxes? Why don't you concentrate on your own taxes. Are you paying enough? And you're crying over 2 trillion? Well, what about the 164 Trullion in unfunded mandates created by Democrats?
didnt 90% of famous rich people come out against trump?
you had an entire campagne where the rich and famous where telling people that trump will destroy america.
but im sure all those rich and famous people did that in support of the poor.
@@weedling3552 depends on what you mean by "famous rich." Celebrities and Hollywood have always supported the Dems. The C-Suite Fortune 500 execs have always supported the Republicans. Is the CFO of say JP Morgan Chase famous? No. But he's just as wealthy as some TV personality or movie star, and I'd argue more powerful because that opinion will affect policy, whereas the movie star's opinion literally does not matter for policy.
Trump coherent? Gimme a break.
You still believe the BS liberal media provides you. The truth is out, even Harris knew she was not going to win according to her staff and her own internal polling.
You think projecting incoherent, unpredictable irrationality doesn't have it's uses?
Depends how you prefer to associate yourself with people.
Biden had never made any sense for over 5 years. The cackling dope has never made any sense in her entire life.😂
By stating an intention to absorb Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal for US security, he just validated Putin’s war on Ukraine. No amount of labelling it irrationality erases that.
Trump seems to be betraying his MAGA supporters. How do you like them apples.😂😂😂
It's laughable that this fellow thinks what is going on resembles anything like a republican government. He sounds like one of those people who likes to interpret what trump means rather than what he says .
And there is no “Mandate”. Tired of hearing that.
@@thestraightroad305 BS.
As laughable as the Clinton, Obama, and Biden Administrations being democratic.....Get Over It.
Yes, tariffs brilliant, hit Canada with 25 % tariff. Genius, 60% of Americans fertilizer needs comes out of ground in Canada. Pure genius
On the contrarty, tariffs reduce trade and often backfire. As an example, the US put a volume limit on Japanese cars in 1981. The Japanese responded by creating the luxury cars Lexus, Infinity, etc. Boomerang, as Putin likes to say. The correct response to foreign competition is to make better products at home.
Did you catch the part about fertilizer
It is genius because it’s forcing them to get rid of their tyrant leaders and in a month or two they will happily comply fighting their borders and selling the US fertilizer.
Supporting Ukraine is the only sensible thing to do. That’s why it’s surprising to see Trump with a turnabout on this. He usually does the opposite of what’s right.
Oh, it’s just gonna be so funny all the smooth Brain people screaming about sending money to Ukraine when they realize Trump is just gonna do the same thing.
The fact that this commentator says that "buying" Greenland is not crazy just shows how ignorant he is, while pretending to be knowledgeable. Denmark has recognized in law, that the people of Greenland are a nation with the right to self-determination under international law. In other words, Greenland is "owned" by Greenland in the same way that Denmark-proper is "owned" by the King of Denmark, i.e. it may state "Denmark" as the sovereign state, but the national sovereignty lies with the people of Greenland. Denmark can no more sell Greenland to the US than we could sell Norway to the US, it is not ours to sell. It seems to be a chronic inability for Americans to just do the bare minimum of study before talking nonsense and making absolute donkeys of themselves!
I apologize on behalf of all 335 million Americans, we are all obviously complete idiots despite the Nobel prizes, technology and whatnot.
@@gregoryadair3223 Your English reading comprehension is certainly lacking, but you yourselves admit that with all your complaints about the American public school system, because I specifically said that THE COMMENTATOR was ignorant, and that it seems that Americans have an inability to study an issue BEFORE talking about it, rather than just pretending they are informed without actually being informed. This is in no way inconsistent with Americans being very capable in other fields and areas, however being an award-winning physicist, like Stephen Hawking, does not equal being knowledgeable about Danish law or history. Again, I can only assume that this is your English-language skills being lacking because my message was very specific in this regard.
And how are the Republican Congress going to ‘set the agenda’ with a one vote margin, pray tell?
It can be done. Mostly by remembering what it has been like to be out in the wilderness for the last 4 years. BTW, the GOP will hopefully pick up a couple of seats when special elections are held to replace cabinet appointees.
@@hymns4ever197that will be telling
IF they had discipline like the Dems...
@ well there’s no unifying principles or mission other than to follow scumbag con artist Trump off a cliff. And flip over the chessboard
The Democrats are actually interested in running the country, like adults
@ you’re dreaming, nowhere but straight down from here, just look at the chaos
This imbecile isn’t even in the White House yet
GOP will be crushed in midterms
Europe/Nato to get to a place where US assistance/membership is irrelevant.
Indeed. Europeans must recognize that a large portion of the US population is sick of militarily carrying them on their back and must adjust accordingly.
Yes. Give Ukfraine NATO membership. Blockade the North Sea.
@LunaticTheCat to be fair. The US hasn't had to single handedly "carry Europe on their back".
Europe hasn't actually needed the United States directly involved in any wars to its defense.
The US however, demanded European support in Afghanistan, and wanted it in Iraq too.
Well, it would take decades, because the entire force structure, equipment, and capabilities of most European nations supplements US military power. Theyre a force multiplier. However, they don't have the capabilities to stand alone. Whether that is naval, air power, logistics, air lift, power projection, equipment, etc. There are some nations like France and the UK that do have global power projection, but again that is very limited, and also serves to basically supplement US power (like France in West Africa or the UK in the Indo-Pacific).
Huh! The Euro zone as we know it will be finished before that. Times have changed. The EU and NATOs corruption has run its course.
He can do that if he wants to. Meaning All American values mean nothing, right? Suggestions of how people should philosophically approach their job as president of all Americans are now simply garbage of the past according to this commenter
Forgive me, but Little Donny has no mandate, as far as I can see!
You can't see past your big nose.😂
@@Natt77 You cannot see past Trump's fake ear bandage.
@@Natt77Denial. The truth is too complex for most amerikans these days
He definitely didn't get over 50% of the votes, so no he doesn't have a mandate.
“Has no mandate”. He won the US election, Jonnie. What are you talking about?!
…wishful thinking. Trump admin is filled to the brim with transactional, fair weather friends. I wouldn’t depend on a coherent strategy. We are now for sale to the highest bidder. F’ tomorrow. The new strategy is now “what is in it for me today”.
If you told my younger self I'd be relieved to hear someone say the new administration may have something like "a coherent Republican foreign policy", I'd have said you were crazy
The tax cuts for the rich should not be extended. That would help social security as a good starter
49% is not a mandate.
It's no more a mandate than his previous win, or Biden's win. This is how many elections have been since 2000. It's a shame they won't work on things they can agree on instead of trying to be d..ks to the other side.
That’s 49.2% . What you want a mandate to be over 50%?
But you mean 49.9%. you should quit watching the view.
IMO a mandate would need to be 60% or more. Just like the senate
You don’t really believe it was 49% do you?
My friend went to Mar a Lago for some event. She said the obsequiousness displayed to Trump was scary.
what obesity? talk english beeman.
I was in Britain last year and told my hosts (to their apparent disbelief) that the Trump movement is a cult, and is fascistic. Unfortunately i made a bet that Trump would lose the election, so there is a man in the West Midlands to whom i owe ten bucks. But the part about fascism, I was right about that.
Russia is not a near peer country. Judging by their military capabilities
The debt ceiling doesn’t prevent runaway spending-it’s merely an arbitrary number that forces negotiations at fixed intervals. Its primary purpose is political, not economic, and it’s disconnected from the real drivers of fiscal health, like economic growth or inflation. Debt grows naturally with inflation and economic expansion, so the ceiling must always be raised. Removing it could streamline efforts to reduce unnecessary spending by eliminating this artificial hurdle and focusing on meaningful fiscal reform instead of political brinkmanship.
Wow. Thank you for an intelligent post. Mostly, I just see slogans, personal attacks, and unfounded conspiracy theories.
Correct. But as I understand it, you should have cost saving policies in place before doing away with the guard rail, which is the debt ceiling.
One of these days the clock will run out. How much, per year, is spent on debt maintenance? And what percentage of GDP is it? I am not a yank so care very little of these numbers. But one day the US will either be forced to start servicing this debt or declare bankrupt. You cant print your way out of debt.
@@12345patbet The point is that guard rail doesn't prevent what it is said to guard against and never will. I think the intentions were legitimate and well placed, but the reality has proven quite different. This the the reason that there has been talk of "minting the coin". The fact that was even possible got me thinking and researching the topic.
Inflation doesn’t increase debt it lowers it by making the previous debt worth less.
Trump does not have any kind of mandate. Period.
What???...The Presidency,House,Congress,Popular vote ain't enough for you???
antidemocratic, selfish, traitor.
@ he did not get the landslide win he claims he did. Essentially it was 50/50 on the popular vote. 1.5 points is not a mandate. Half of the country think he’s unfit.
sorry what world are u in Susan
@ Earth one, where facts are facts, science is respected and we know 49% of the popular vote does not a mandate make.
Trump doesn't need the MAGA right now.
He only needs the MAGA masses to scare congressmen into doing things against the average American
MAGA is itself divided. But, Trump needs all the Pubbies in Congress to get anything passed.
@ that means he needs the base. Without the base to threaten politicians by primary Trump wont get anything done. And that’s a good thing
He only wanted their votes, now he's won the election they're of secondary importance. Let's see how the clown show does by the mid-terms and whether they'll support him.
The US, once Army pensions are taken into account (which Europe do not) pay NO MORE than Europe to Nato
Also Europe should get its gas from US: more jobs there and it helps to weaken Mordor's economy and guarantees Europe isn't dependent on Mordor anymore.
Right, being dependent on a single supplier worked so well for us in the past.
Trump has huge personal debt and always has
Trump has gone bankrupt six times. Trump games the legal system.
I think Greenland will not like to be under American healthcare! They will prefer what they have right now and they will later persue their independence from Denmark too.
Not really; Denmark pays for half of their total budget and also provides military protection! They would be mad to seek independence!
@@xornxenophon3652 You are right, but they are still dreaming about it.
Lying is lying and not "just his personality".
Talking about Clinton? Or Obama? Or Biden? Or maybe Kamala? No, I got it! All of them.
@GARYGUYTON-c7i but only Trump has the capacity to lie at 8 lies per minute over extended periods.
@@shaunvduke Only Democrats, especially ex-Presidents have the ability to live their entire lives as a lie.
@@shaunvduke But the D lie throughout their lives, all day every day.
5% is not unreaonable, how the world is with Russia, China - muslim countries etc. Spend it, deal with the threats and be done with it.
The purchase of Greenland is not a crazy idea?
It isn't for sale, you fool.
Everything has a price though....
He isn't assembling a government. He is assembling a cast of clowns for TV. And we are in for 4 seasons of this.
As if we haven't had plenty of clownish buffoonery the last four years.
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i Trump is a licensed clown as part of his performance in WWE events, according to the New York circus commission.
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i I still cannot wrap my brain around why, even after 9 years of this, there are still people who think the whiniest and most fragile crybaby on Earth is admirable.
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i The WWE are legally clowns.
@@GARYGUYTON-c7i Trump is a member of the WWE.
Keep telling yourself that and watch what happens.
Social security comes out of MY CHECK. It’s NOT part of the federal budget.
I think Clinton combined it with the budget, got a surplus, then Bush gave it away to the rich with tax cuts. Now Trump will give the rich tax cuts and there won't be the money. Get ready to go back to work.
I don't understand this logic by some cost cutters. Social security is the largest govt expenditure but income tax makes up over half of govt intake. Reducing immigration will reduce a lot of dollars leaving the US(which imo isn't that harmful because the dollar is a globally recognized reserve currency), but I think more help would be raising the tide of the economy, therefore incomes, and therefore govt intake. Cutting household spending is essential, but at some point you must increase household income.
@@nunyabusiness863 No, Ivan. As another poster said, Social Security is funded directly by citizens for every paycheck. It is not funded by taxes one a year.
how do you think the federal budget is financed?
its from taxes, so what are you even talking about?
all of the federal budget "comes out your check",
so does all government spending.
(i dont actually think you pay high taxes, coz you dumb)
It's both. It's just another tax. It's delusional to pretend that specific tax dollars are earmarked for specific purposes. It doesn't work that way, it's just an accounting fiction. The reality is that money is fungible. The only thing that causes the government to honor commitments such as Social Security is the integrity of elected officials. And in the case of Social Security, those weasels have been looting the fund for a couple generations to pay for their boondoggles and tax giveaways to the rich. And then they screech that the fund is insolvent after they took the money out.
Tell you what - we will spend more on defense when you spend more on health.
I thought trump said he would make one call right after he won, one phone call. What a phony.
Wishful thinking by the media who always wants a story!
Musk and vivek are baaad news. They gotta go trump!!
hes trying not to be bias but you can tell he's MAGA diehard
I pray you are correct. Trump has no need to prove himself anymore.
Gotta hand it to these National Review guys. Normalizing a proposed purchase of Greenland?!
All Americans are very LOUD when it comes to our bread and butter all Americans I just wanna make that very clear left right green yellow blue. We’re all very very loud when it comes to our money.
More of the usual word salad from Times Radio.
National Rino Review
Russia is not a near peer competitor, it is a Third World country with snow, a Third World European country, which is a rare thing these days, its army isn't any good and it has bad weapons, it has a few nukes, but then so does India and China, and unlike China, Russia is not an industrial powerhouse, it exports few things besides natural resources!
So Trump will pick a fight with the Left over immigration provocations, while also ditching the Far Right (though Trump will try to string them along with his Left provocations). Times Radio seems content with this prospect, but doesn't consider the likelihood of a recession in the US in the next 2 years. Not a repeat of 2016-20!
President Roosevelt could have said to Churchill :" UK and France should have spent more money for their defence". Probably a right analysis, but does not help in the current situation.🤣
Trump has a weak mandate having not even reaching 50 percent of the popular vote.
He will surely find out. I am delighted to see Trump's cult attacking President Musk, and happy to watch Elon melt down. We've had few good days, finally.
What this man says boils down to Trump is an idiot throwing out jibberish at random, nobody takes his serious. Americans know this is only a loud mouth and don’t pay a lot of attention.
So then the big question is: why elect the guy?
Because you don’t have a clue how Americans view Trump.
Because a large portion of our population is incredibly ignorant, and the Democrats are incompetent and incapable or running a winning campaign.
Because a large portion of the American voting public are idiots!! You get the government you deserve!!😂@sybillie grob.
@@StillAliveAndKicking_ you are probably right. I am European. My question was genuine. Why would you elect somebody of whom you know he is bsing and cannot deliver 90% of his promises. So please educate me what is the rationale here.
@@SybilleGrob I know plenty of British people and some North Americans who admire Trump. He is seen as anti - woke, and they point to his never starting a war which is true, and the economic growth under Trump, which is true I think, but that may owe more to predecessors and luck. Biden had covid, which was bad luck and damaged the economy. Trump talks simple language, in simple terms, with simple solutions. They like that. And don’t forget that Harris often talked gibberish, she did not have a good record, and she promoted some extreme woke ideologies. Having a man pretending to be a woman in a senior government role would alienate a lot of Americans. Personally I think Trump is dangerous, he has a 5 minute attention span if that, he was found guilty of sexual assult and fraud, a nasty piece of work.
I reckon Trump is pleased to have Musk in the public eye. When the SHTF he can push Musk under the bus and most of the citizenry will agree. Put the worst case forward then back off and look good.
Guest speaker is Noah Rothman, author of 'Unjust', the book prominently displayed in the background.
good things happen when politicians listen to actual experts
Trump doesn't shift. That implies he has a firm grasp in reality and adjusts his thinking accordingly.
What he really does is lurch back and forth. MAGA appreciates the simplicity
He's a FLIP-FLOP.
@Buckets1000 I remember when that meant something...
With the American military-industrial complex potentially losing billions in contracts (Musk, notwithstanding), the not-so-rhetorical-question is asked of "king Tr***": can you really afford to lose the war in Ukraine? (or, can he afford NATO/EU winning without him??)
It's gonna be a lame duck presidency. No question.
You could save by cutting education, welfare andinfastructure
Rules based disorder
One of the most insipid interviews that I’ve viewed from Times Radio.
From information on international sites, the US does NOT spend even 2% of GDP themselves for NATO. It's less than 1% as of right now according to the financial information. Asking other NATO members to spend more than America does seems a bit hypocritical.
It's a NATO mandate on defence, not on NATO only defense.
The US spends 3.5% officially, and it is really closer to 4%. The only other NATO country doing that is Poland. The US was footing about 70% of Europe's security costs for as long as I can remember; US taxpayers have been spending more than the rest of the Alliance for 80 years. We don't actually like this situation. I am anti-Trump, but he is right about this point and 100% of Americans predictably agree about redistributing the burden. This has been the position of every US president since Truman, Trump did not in vent it.. Saying "5%" is an obvious attempt to get to 3.5, which is perfectly reasonable and overdue, not hypocrisy.
The US govt spends too much on health for too little return. Efficiency should focus on getting the system right and stopping corporate gouging, not cutting back on services.
How can anyone trust a man who says things like "drill baby drill"?
he wants the price of oil to drop , that will banckrupt ruzia
@@rommeo27
BS, that is not the reason Trump says drill daddy drill or whatever.
Putin and Trump are in cahoots, Trump is certainly not out to get Putin.😂
Trump, is helping Zelenskyy, overthrow Putin, the story goes, all fake.
Trump just says "Drill everywhere, muaaa haaa haaaaa..."👹
because it sounds tough, and ruthless, and savage, making the creepy & criminal minded Maga drool. 🤤
I am all for decreasing America's dependence upon foreign oil but Trump is just mouthing off again.
@@rommeo27I was thinking the same, and the war will end faster 👍
That's literaly the least untrustworthy thing he's done...
America has been saying it for four years? It was brain dead Biden who cut off the Keystone XL pipeline
He said I love debt.
Trump has a pretty slim mandate to do anything extreme.
Not a crazy idea!???🤯😱wow
Immigrants...
How hard can it be.
IN....
or
OUT...
?
( Sweden )
Please, can USA come and purchase Nigeria 😂😂😂.
80% of our population will vote for it
What's with the click bate thumbnail?
RINOS r gone !!
Musk just needs to sell the idea that skilled visa approvals will help MAGA by building the countries Tech infrastructure.
If Trump keeps supporting zelinsky then you can guarantee Ukraine will be toast all of it
BS !
Calling Russia a competitor to the USA entirely discounted everything you have to say.
Wannabe competitor, but in reality a third world country.
Western arrogance is so annoying
@@enshk79Russian is arrogance is far more annoying and destructive.
It's hard for trump to belittle Ukraine.
He gives it his best.
The US is literally paying for the country to exist.
Trump owns Zelenski and Ukraine.
@@marisabenson1222 in case it needs to be said, Trump is a narcissistic sociopath, and he could nto care less about Ukraine.
Even trump.might fall in line with G.O.P on certain things..with trumpian changes, and enhancements.
Alen Musk for instance doesn't have presidential information like trump.mow does..Musk still.is saposedly focused on mars..
Whether they are vocal or not doesn't mean they do not want to cull migration, see the trends throughout Europe and those voices are likely to get louder.
You are dreaming. Hoping on hope.
And everybody knows it’s obvious but you.
That is the first thing that Donald trump has done that makes any sense
Take the win Donald. Stop Russia before they go on thru Belarus to the Baltic States. And Finland. Asaad's gone, Russia and Iran are set back big time. Take the win Donald. Make Europe pay for their defense. Don't blow it.
I'm from Belarus. You people are so brainwashed that it causes mortality in the world, your ignorance does.
Jeez, he looks like orange jr twin brother
Sounds like voting for trump is like voting for brexit
It's voting for instability. And let's see what the markets do.
What the people remember is from 2016 to 2020 everything was lower not just in America but in the world and that’s what the voters remember and it will start with energy prices. Everything else will come down after that, but it won’t happen overnight but it will happen.
Tariffs make prices go up, not down @@wayman1776
@@wayman1776 Prices are never going back to 2016 figures. It never happens, short of a depression. Prices adjusted for inflation might come down, but the raw numbers won't.
Stop covering US politics. It should be clear given your "analysis" in the last few years that you have zero clue. Your commentary is essentially at the level of the BBC's.
Interesting
Probably, highly likely, we hope so, etc, etc. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Are you news show or circus' prothets? 😅😅😅😅
The times have had putin is finished headlines since 2022 your credibility is gone
Yet you still feel the need to comment on this 'irrelevance'? Gopnik🤡
@baldyslapnut. Yep as a Brit I find it important to point on my own media bs
@@jonnys13-g9t If you had said "point out" rather than "point on", you would sound more like someone whose native language is English. You should also have said "my own media's bs" rather than "my own media bs". Take a break and have a glass of tea.
troll
@gregoryadair3223 nope look it up go through the video see the titles
SPECULATORS TODAY ARE EXPERTS 😂😂😂😂
Hehehe!!!
Trump thinks he can buy Greenland from Denmark, he has no clue! Denmark cant sell Greenland, they have partial autonomy!
Trump can ask Greenland to declare full independence, and then ask them to be Americans or invade 😂😂😂
Maximalist objectives, goals, deliverables? What jargonistic tripe, typical American BS hype.
Trump should by russia
Smart commentator. Impressed!