Little Prelude in C Major, BWV 939 by Johann Sebastian Bach - Magdalena Haubs
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Magdalena Haubs plays Little Prelude in C Major from "Five Little Preludes", BWV 939 by Johann Sebastian Bach (1685 - 1750). It is the 16th piece from the Russian Piano School Book 2.
Sponsored by the culture and media representative of the German federal government on behalf of NEUSTART KULTUR.
Please consider donating. Every donation will help me implement even more musical projects! Just click on the following link: www.paypal.com...
Thank you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magdalena Haubs spielt Kleines Präludium in C-Dur aus "Fünf kleine Präludien", BWV 939 von Johann Sebastian Bach (1685 - 1750). Es ist das 16. Stück aus der Russischen Klavierschule Band 2.
Gefördert von der Beauftragten der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien im Rahmen von NEUSTART KULTUR.
Ich freue mich riesig über eine Spende. Damit helfen Sie mir, noch mehr musikalische Projekte in die Tat umzusetzen! Das geht ganz einfach unter: www.paypal.com...
Iniziato a studiare due gg fa
Prima esperienza con Bach 😊👋🏻
Beautiful interpretation!
Thank you!
Lovely!
Thanks! :)
👏
Moje profesorka vždy říkala, " není potřeba se vrtět u klavíru".😂
Très bien donné. Merci et bravo. Cordialement. Olivier F
Merci beaucoup!
muy bien!!
Gracias!
Isn't that really really slow?
Your comment reminds me of how there are so many different interpretations of Bachs music, especially concerning the tempo. Do you know that Glenn Gould recorded the Goldberg Variations twice - once when he was really young and another time when he was a lot older? The tempo and interpretation is completely different between these two versions. It is amazing on how there are so many different ways to play Bachs music. I personally like the speed. However, this speed is not set in stone. Feel free to play it in a different tempo.
@@MagdalenaHaubs gould plays bach in a way bach would not recognise.
@@MagdalenaHaubs i had asked b/c it would mean i play it way too fast - so now i need to look it up :D
Very good 👌
Thank you!
huh? Why is she putting so much feeling and gestures into that mini piece? I played it when i was 9 or something. I just remember there should be that much extra "feelings" into the piece. Plus if i remember correctly there is something about the tempi she is playing it at. Shouldn't the piece be played faster?
Your comment reminds me of how there are so many different interpretations of Bachs music, especially concerning the tempo. Do you know that Glenn Gould recorded the Goldberg Variations twice - once when he was really young and another time when he was a lot older? The tempo and interpretation is completely different between these two versions. It is amazing on how there are so many different ways to play Bachs music. I personally like the speed and interpretation this way. However, my interpretation is not set in stone. Feel free to play it differently.
@@MagdalenaHaubsAccording I think when it comes to Bach, there are main points. 1) is the whole tempo and metronome problem and 2) the introduction of the modern day piano. As for how his music is supposed to sound one can also roughly divide it into two. 1) How Bach imagined and how he could have imagined his music being played and 2) the modern day interpretations, both free and very differering interpretations and interpretations based heavily on the introduction of the modern pianoforte. We haven't even scratched on the surface on what the different great music schools do and what distinguishes between the different approaches, and or what different great interpretators do. My journey with Bach's music started over 30 years ago. At the age of 15 I was told I had roughly completed 1/3 of Bach's organ and pianoworks. I think when it comes to Bach's works and compared to his childrens works you have to look at what influenced them through their life. I am speaking really loose about it here. It's a quite complex subject to speak about. 1 of the main differences when looking from one aspect, is that CPE didn't have the teachings from a tight network like Bach had from his father and uncles, which then again leaves him in many ways to have this free spirit form early on to seek(maybe out of necessity) knowledge and inspiration from outwards early on. All this is also strongly reflected in the contrast to Bach's works, which is what makes his works so ingenious in the contrapunkt and various "figures" in his music. With regard to performance and the interpretation to performance, I would look towards Neuhaus-school(Taking huge jumps and leaps). Look at what Gilels, Richter and Gavrilov do. Many examples won't have a direct link to Bach or CPE, but will have had a heavy impact from the transition over to the pianoforte "idea". With regards to Gould( he is one of my favourite 3 performers) I appreciate him for many other things also besides his works with Bach.
@@Ianthe22 You address many exciting and controversial topics. I also agree with you on a lot of things. But going into everything would go beyond the scope here, especially since we probably wouldn't get to the end. :D I think it's great that you deal so intensively with Bach's music. I think he may even be the greatest of all composers. I wish I could talk to him about his music and how he would like to hear it on our modern instruments!
@@MagdalenaHaubs The thing about Bach was that he is so uniquely into his own field of the music. His music isn't as uplifting and beautiful as Händel's music in many aspects, or as aesthetic in the melody line as in Vivaldi's music. I kinda attribute this to the fact that he worked and innovated his craft and looked outwards quite late in his career/life. I use the word ingenious instead of genius(Personally I don't like the word genius), which even doesn't justify Bach's works. He is among the greatest. Especially his more complex works leaves one with a satisfaction and hunger for more(both at the same time). It's a testament to his technicality and writings.
ewwww