How a EM-2 Janson Automatic Rifle Works

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2022
  • Wikipedia:
    The EM-2, also known as Rifle, No.9, Mk.1 or Janson rifle, was a British assault rifle. It was briefly adopted by British forces in 1951, but the decision was overturned very shortly thereafter by Winston Churchill's incoming government in an effort to secure NATO standardisation of small arms and ammunition. It was an innovative weapon with the compact bullpup layout, built-in carrying handle and an optical sight.
    The gun was designed to fire one of the first purpose-designed entirely new intermediate cartridges, designed to a 1945 requirement as a result of combat experience and German advances in weapons design during World War II. The round, the .280 British, was designed to replace the .303 round, which dated to the late 19th century. The EM-2 was intended to replace the Lee-Enfield bolt-action rifles and various submachineguns, while the TADEN would replace the Bren gun and Vickers machine gun.
    As part of NATO standardization efforts, the United States claimed the .280 British round was too weak for use in rifles and machine guns, and instead favoured the much more powerful 7.62×51mm NATO round. A bullpup layout for a British service rifle was finally adopted some years later in form of the SA80 assault rifle, which remains in service today.
    Type Bullpup assault rifle
    Place of origin United Kingdom
    Service history
    In service 1951
    Used by United Kingdom
    Production history
    Designer Stefan Kenneth Janson
    Designed 1948-1950
    Manufacturer RSAF Enfield
    Chambons
    Birmingham Small Arms Company[1]
    No. built 59[2]
    Variants 6.25×43mm, 7×49mm, 7×51mm, 7.62×51mm NATO, .30-06 Springfield, Carbine, HBAR, Winter trigger variant[1]
    Specifications
    Mass 3.49 kg (7.7 lb)
    Length 889 mm (35.0 in)
    Barrel length 623 mm (24.5 in)
    Cartridge .280 British
    Action Gas-operated, flapper-locked
    Rate of fire 450-600 round/min (7.5 to 10 /s)
    Muzzle velocity 771m/s (2,545 ft/s)
    Effective firing range 700 m (770 yd)
    Feed system 20-round detachable box magazine
    Sights Optical
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @gamingledgens2112
    @gamingledgens2112 5 місяців тому +3

    The best rifle that was never used.

  • @ruslanpaladinov9488
    @ruslanpaladinov9488 Рік тому +1

    I love how assault rifle that mechanism is only striker fired. For me its similar to bolt action rifle but its fully automatic

  • @jayaang4176
    @jayaang4176 3 місяці тому

    You can see how relatively flimsy the flapper lock is, and why the British didn’t trust it in 7.62x51, its a shame the US ordnance board got its way and prevented NATO from adopting proper assault rifle to counter the AK

  • @endonol4408
    @endonol4408 Рік тому

    One only the mechanism with striker fired, but why after later various battle or assult rifle then commonly used hammer?

    • @apersonyoudontknow5492
      @apersonyoudontknow5492 Місяць тому

      I think it's more simpler for hammer type firearms to be produced than striker types. The mechanism for striker types is more complex which is harder to produce.

  • @hecker2104
    @hecker2104 Рік тому

    Pls do AA12 :)))

  • @GearTiger007
    @GearTiger007 5 місяців тому

    very nice video, like such slow move show! thank you !

  • @harveynguyen1511
    @harveynguyen1511 Рік тому +1

    an unsafe gun !

    • @brailixs1481
      @brailixs1481 Рік тому +1

      Why

    • @thepruh1151
      @thepruh1151 10 місяців тому +7

      This comment is brought to you by the 1950's US Ordnance Department.

  • @johnsabini2330
    @johnsabini2330 4 місяці тому +1

    Winston Churchill interfered in the selection process and robbed the army of an advanced weapon. He was biased towards the FAL, two of his reasons was the FAL looked better for ceremonial drill and it had a butt that could be ued as a club 🤦‍♂️ what a plonker!

    • @americangangster1911
      @americangangster1911  4 місяці тому

      Yeah but the FAL is a good rifle even if his reasoning was whack.

    • @jayaang4176
      @jayaang4176 3 місяці тому

      I read it was more for logistics, as the USA had prevented NATO from using the superior intermediate cartridge

    • @johnsabini2330
      @johnsabini2330 3 місяці тому

      @@jayaang4176 Some were converted to .308 (7.62) so could have gone ahead in this calibre. There is an example of one on UA-cam, likely would have taken auto off a per L1A1.