Canon EF 75-300mm Lens vs EF-S 55-250mm STM Lens
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- What's better, the Canon 75-300mm EF lens, or the Canon 55-250mm EF-S STM lens? Both are very popular options for beginner/entry-level photographers, but which one will work better for you? I'm about to review both these lenses, take them through numerous tests, and find out which one is going to work best for you!
NOTE: If you purchase a lens from these links, I do receive a bit of a commission, BUT the primary reason for leaving these is because there are multiple versions of both lenses, so the ones I link here are the versions I tested in this video!
👉Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III: geni.us/deR3EAU
👉Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM: geni.us/FxVz
📸My Camera Gear:
Main Camera (Full-Frame Mirrorless): geni.us/KT16
Secondary Camera (Canon 80D): geni.us/xjz4srA
Action Camera: geni.us/UcbQMAC
Favorite SD Card (Sandisk Extreme): geni.us/6IZZZ1
Vlogging Lens: geni.us/sJiRMlB
Favorite Lens: geni.us/5Jsow
Astrophotography Lens: geni.us/BUJ7A
Portrait Lens: geni.us/5Jsow
Telephoto Lens: geni.us/FxVz
Camera Microphone: geni.us/As22SZf
Desktop Microphone: geni.us/rDta
Favorite Light kit: geni.us/vhEbl
Video ND Filter: geni.us/IReJn
Main Vlogging Tripod: geni.us/Ktgm
Travel Tripod: geni.us/cIAmLK
Camera Stabilizer 3-Axis Gimbal: geni.us/yABF
Dope Backpack (USA GEAR SLR Bag): geni.us/iNgWUr
🎵Where I get music & sound effects for my videos. Sign up for a free 30-day trial here: share.epidemic...
🎥My 2nd Channel: / @joshwiniarski2
💻My Online Community (Discord Server): / discord
🔷My Instagram: / winiarskijosh
📧Contact me: contactjosh.winiarski@gmail.com
Some of the above links are affiliate links. There is no additional cost to you, but if you do decide to purchase a product through these links, I may receive a commission that helps fund the channel.
#canon55-250
#nosmallcreator
#canon75-300
I like that "screw it" line, and "use whatever gear you have", too. That was motivational bc it's easy to get discouraged over gear.
Great comparison, exactly what I was looking for. Although the lens price has nearly doubled in the past 2 years.
For what I am seeing of the lenses, another big differents is that the 75-300mm lens is compatible with a tele-converter (I have one, it's a Sigma APO tele-converter 2x)... I am not sure with the 55-250mm lens, because it has a EF-S mount on it. If it is compatible, than you have no use of the IS. I think if you are compare with eachother, it can make a huge differents.
I picked up the 55-250 a couple of weeks ago, and I've quite liked it both on my 7D Mk II and my 20D. Even on my very old 300D it is a nice lens.
EXACTLY the video i was looking for! Thank you
My pleasure!
I know this is an old video. You know what Josh, I totally get the sleep thing. All the experts say 8 hours, but if I’m a good boy and try to do that consistently it fails and I start to feel off my game. So glad you mentioned this. I think the sleep scientists have missed something.
a good root before going on is the way & maybe a chem or 2.
This video is wonderful, thanks!!!!!
Happy to help!
Thanks a lot. This post helped me out to make the right decision !!! See ya
Glad I could help!
I got a EF-S 55- 250mm IS II for 40€ 😁
That's awesome, nice find!
@@JoshWiniarski Thanks :)
@@CharlesEDarko on ebay?? i bought one for 90$
@@toutpost Yes "eBay Kleinanzeigen", I also got the EOS M100 with the kit lens for 130€.
@@CharlesEDarko nice
Wich lens it’s better???
hello everyone will this be worth getting the 55 to 250 lens for the rebel t7 instead of the 75-300 starter lens? thank you
Nice video! I have a canon 70D and have been using a 18-135mm lens for everything. My main focus is astrophotography and I'm wondering if the 250mm lens you used would be good for that type of photography. Also, would the lens fit a 70D? I'd assume so because you use an 80D. Just checking.
Actually I couldn't recommend it for astrophotography. Do you like to shoot zoomed-in for astro, or wider (like 18mm)? The problem with this lens is it has a pretty slow aperture which doesn't let in much light. I'd try to get something that can go down to f/2.8 for astrophotography, it'll give you MUCH better results! Personally, I really like the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, Canon 24mm f/2.8, and Sigma 17-50 f/2.8. Hope this helps!
Yes this lens would fit the 70d!
hey bro well the 55-250mm fit my ESO 250D?
Yep, it'll work great!
Great video! You deserve a lot more subscribers. I think I’m going to get the 55-250.
Good choice, I'm sure you'll love it! And thanks, glad you think so, i'll try to keep pumping out content and we'll just see what happens!
How can it be a "great video" when it literally begins with 3 minutes 15 seconds of filler before the review actually starts?
@@AlumniQuad why are u a f’ing hater??
@@BrooklynDaDon1 I came to watch a lens review and instead I got 3:15 of irrelevant rambling.
yes.. experienced guy
Watched this video a day after I got my 55 to 250mm lens, I’m happy with my choice.
Brady Davis Me to😂
Brady Davis i just bought mine too im hapyyy
I have them both, I got 75-300mm as kit lens along with 18-55mm when I bought my first DSLR T6i. I took decent cityscape at night with 77-300mm, the result was outstanding probably because I used tripod that night. However, I used it only twice then I got 55-250mm after couple of months so I decided to sell my 75 since it was still brand new. When I went to photography shop (Henry's) they told me they buy it for 20$!!! "Heck no" I said..... I rather keep it than giving you for free so you can sell it for 98$ at least (I live in Canada). So I kept it :)
Wow, $20 yeah I wouldn't sell it to them either. You can definitely get $50-100 for it selling on eBay or Craigslist!
man if you still had i pay much more seems the shop you took it to sounded like a Pawn shop thas what they want to offer folks the $20 bucks gig been 2year but i am looking to buy Lenses for my Cannon Rebel EOS T5i .
Thank you so much for helping me out! I have been struggling between the two lenses for a week now... I'm going to keep the 55-250 and return the 75-300 😁
Just listening and i was reminded of Walter White Jr
I have gotten this exact comment SO MANY TIMES over the years 😅
Thank you! I was looking for a zoom lens. This review helped me alot! I’m gonna buy the 55-250 now!
I'm glad it helped! Hope you make something awesome with that lens!
I purchased the 55-250 lens and I love it
Thanks for the comparison. I actually have both lens, but I've never compared them. I tend to use the 55-250 because it's lighter, and am glad to hear that I'm probably using the better of the two. I do like the solid feel of the 75-300 and might try it again when I upgrade my Canon camera.
Hey man, i am just wondering which lens do you prefer and why? (Hope you did compare them)
@@wrplayz4108 I've been meaning to do a side by side comparison with some of the flowers and wildlife in my yard. I'll have to do that. I tend to use the 55-250 more often because it's newer and lighter. Gotta pull that other one out!
I’m the exact same with 6.5 hours of sleep
Huh interesting. Hopefully some sort of "sleep doctor" watches this at some point and can explain it. I'm pretty sure it just has to do with REM cycles but I'm just totally guessing haha!
Great comparison, thank you! I just got a T7 (1500D) and have been looking to get my second lens, and have been on the fence between the 70-300 EF and the 55-250 EF-S (with IS and STM AF). This confirms for me I will be getting the 55-250.
So excited for you, hope you get some awesome pics with it!
I bought my 55-250mm STM used for just $80 and I would highly recommend going that route.
It makes a great pairing with Canon cameras with dual pixel AF or even the mediocre hybrid CMOS AF.
Wow, yeah if you can get it for $80 that's a great deal!
Great review! Really useful info for helping me decide. You touched on all my questions and the tests you ran on both provided some great information. Also appreciate that you didn't crap on the other lens despite it not yielding the best results. Thanks!
Great to hear! You're very welcome!
I've noticed the same thing about 6.5 hours of sleep. Any more or less I feel tired all day. But 6.5 hours makes me feel awesome all day! It's so bizarre.
Maybe an expert on sleep..."a sleep doctor," will happen to watch this video and explain it. I think it has something to do with REM cycles but tbh I'm just guessing haha.
Don't forget y'all, uf you have an APS-C sensor, this lens is 88-400mm.
wow
@@fabersosa It's the effective focal length. FL times crop-factor. In the case of Canon's APS-C format, it's 1.6x
Is that true? I thought, because the EF lens is a full frame lens, the crop factor comes into play making it effectively a 120-480 when put on an APS-C camera. But the 55-250 lens is an EF-S lens, designed for an APS-C camera. So is it not what is says on the lens body, a 55-250? Just when I think I'm getting this, someone throws me a curve.
@@paulboddy355 apprently the focal length does not work that way...
You may want to use a booster to remove that crop.
Glad i saw this one, where i live 55-250mm is on sale and its u$200,, getting this together with 50mm 1.8 & 10-18mm! Thanks!!
That's an awesome set of lenses, super stoked for you!
Josh Winiarski yeeeees!🥰👌
you're right, always sleep in 90 min intervals. as long as you wake up on every 90 min mark, youll wake up ready to bounce.
Speaking of somebody who owns both of these lenses I like the extra 50 mm for longer range shots on a tripod but the medium range shots That are mostly handheldI use The 55 to 250 because of the image stabilization on that lens
My trouble atm is, I have done some Moon-shootings, with a borrowed 75-300 and it does them pretty well. The 250 could probably also do them but it'd be abit further away.
But I also don't only shoot photos of things which are extremely far away. I really need to get my hands on a 55-250, and it must be an stm. I have the 50mm stm and I hate the sound of the kitlense focusing
@@Daniel-dj7fh Yes it’s actually another hundred millimeters when you factor in that the 75 300 was built for a full frame camera where are the 55 to 250 was meant for a crop sensor camera like the rattles or the double digit D cameras
@@MattyC62185 Ya I've got a 2000d. I heard or read somewhere that the 55-250 wont work on a full frame, know if that's true?
@@Daniel-dj7fh no it will not fit a full frame
Neither will any EFS lens EF (full frame) lenses will fit a crop sensor camera but not the other way around
5:25 that chromatic aberration is unreal...
I've shot with the 75 and it does suck. I've own the 55 and it's great. It produces images far better than its price would imply. I highly recommend the 55-250 for any Canon APS-C camera user. It's well worth the money. I tested it against a 70-200 f/4 L on my 70 D and the images from the 55-250 looked just as good. The only category in which the L series lens was superior was build quality. You will not regret the purchase of the 55-250 unless you treat your lenses very roughly.
Dude, you're so charismatic. Your videos are super fun to watch. Some other review videos can be boring but you make it high energy and fun! Subscribed!!!
I appreciate that, my philosophy is if I have fun making them, odds are people will have fun watching them!
Great stuff Josh and thanks for not making us hobbyist picture-takers feel bad. LOL! I'm new to the game and frankly "afraid" to invest a lot of money right now in lenses until I learn a bit more about them. There are a lot of snobs out there and I found that out real quick. I purchased the 75 - 300mm lens on Amazon for $199 new and looking forward to getting it in the mail. This is actually how I found your video as I was looking for a review on that lens because I have no idea what to expect out of it. I rented the 55 - 250 and absolutely loved it, especially for portraits. Your video was not only extremely helpful but also encouraging for a newbie like me. Keep making great content. I love it and thanks again! 👍🏾✌🏾
I agree with Daniel's comment below though...the 55 - 250 is the better choice....and you do deserve more subscribers. They will come! 😊
Thanks Marlon for the thoughtful comment, I love hearing how my videos encourage people! I think one of the biggest problems in the photography community is the fact that people who have more money or have done it longer disregard all the entry level equipment (even though they were probably using the same stuff like 2 years ago haha). Glad to hear you're getting into the world of photography, go make some awesome stuff!
@@JoshWiniarski I sure will. Thanks Bro!
Screw the lens what was that socks and crocs 😂😂😂
Woah woah woah. Where are these under $100 lenses?
Do you or anyone here know if the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM is compatible with the Canon EOS Rebel Camera T7?
Yep, it is compatible and will work flawlessly!
The 70-300 is sharper then the 75-300 it is not much more. But they are good lenses. Don't buy a lens with a plastic mount they break. Better of buying an after market lens with a metal mount.
I've heard good things about that lens, will have to check it out at some point! I agree, generally speaking a plastic mount seems like a silly way to cut costs, it's definitely a drawback to the 55-250mm.
When you said "remove the chromatic aberration," how would you go about doing that?
It depends on your editing software. Programs like Adobe Lightroom Classic have a small box you can check that will get rid of most of it automatically. If it doesn't work, they then have a series of sliders you can move around until it works. Hope this helps!
I have a 18-175 and want to step up to take far bird photos which one should I upgrade to
55-250
Thanks! I'm a brazilian guy and I think Im going to buy a 55-250mm
I hope you create some awesome stuff with it!
Pretty stoked I got the 55-250mm lens I've used the 75-300mm too and they're both great
That's awesome, I hope you get some sweet shots with it!
I also have the 75-300 and im thinking on getting the 55-250, is the focusing a lot better on the 55-250? Because the focusing is so slow in my 75-300... i have it mount on my canon 1000d (7focus points)
@@tugazuga the difference between them isn't worth getting the other one if you have one already I'd definitely keep it and save up for something else later but if I had no lens id buy the 55-250 first 😊❤️
I started out with the 75-300mm and eventually acquired the 55-250mm. Was going to sell the 75-300mm but why? Wouldn't get much for it and yes, it's still a great lens. And I still use it
Absolutely loved the video! You almost lost me with "socks and crocks" at first ;)
But your testing method was solid and your encouragement of "screw it, shoot with the gear you have" and encouraging new photographers to worry more about capturing moments was SPOT ON!
You've earned yourself a new subscriber!
Socks, Crocks, Prius. You must be trolling us.
I am glad I found this review. I have the 55-250mm, and was wondering if I should buy the 70-300mm. This answers my question.
Happy to hear that!
Finally. You clear my mind. I will go to 55-250 ef-s lens. Thanks you so much for this video.
Great vid man, I was about to buy the 75-300 but now I would consider the 55-250
I have a Canon 600d (Rebel T3i), anyone know if the 55-250 would be better than any sort of Tamron equivalent? Seems the prices of these have gone UP quite a bit since this video came out.
6 to 7 hours is my sweet spot too
Guuuuuuy, I LOVE YOU
Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!!!
My pleasure, happy to help!
I absolutely loved my 70-200 2,8L. And then I bought the 55-250 IS (the first version, I beleive there were 3 different versions, the 55-250, the 55-250 II and the latest, the STM which is far superior than the first) and I loved the first version. I really enjoed using it when going out with kids with a limited amount of gear and even on that one the image quality was superb. Since then they upgraded the IS, the AF system (they are fast working amazingly effective (IS) and silent. ) As far as I know they did some improvement in the glass elements inside, so the STM is even sharper than the original 55-250 which was very very good to begin with.
I second this. I have this lens and it is damn sharp. The af is so silent you cant really hear it
wow.... after a couple hours of research you were by far more helpful than any other video, Thanks!
Glad to hear it, happy to help!
Hi Josh, I like your videos; they are to the point and actionable. Can you recommend a lens for an EOS Rebel T2i for birding/animal watching at a distance? Yes, my camera is old, and I need a new one, but before I move on, I want to see my options. I currently have a Cannon 55-250 with an image stabilizer, but I would like to know if there is another zoom lens that isn't cost-prohibitive. It's also okay to tell me it's time to move on!
I literally gave away a 75-300 recently lol. Anytime someone asks me which telephoto they should buy, I steer them away from this at all costs. The 55-250 is far superior.
I have the 75-300 that I use with an APS-C camera, an EOS Rebel XSi, and have been looking for a replacement for it lately mainly because of the chromatic aberration when I have it out to 300mm. My next longest lens is a Tamron 278D 80-210mm, which I really like using until I park my car at a nature preserve or park and get out to try to capture wildlife or what have you. Being that I'm in Michigan, it's overcast a lot, and I find that on overcast days pointing upwards into the trees to capture a bird or whatever is typically going to have just a ton of purple and green fringing when I use the 75-300. On a clear, blue sky day or against greenery I've managed some pretty nice shots... As long as the white content is kept to a minimum, which includes the subject. But it's a weird lens in that it doesn't always happen. Case in point: I took a bunch of pics of a mute swan on the river at 300mm and had next basically zero fringing and had some really decent detail in the feathers, but another pic I took of a butterfly on a tasel, also at 300mm, had quite a bit of purple on white areas of the flower itself or any part approaching white (like the tips of the thorns) while managing pretty good detail on the butterfly.
I had considered adding the EF-S 55-250 to my lens collection but was concerned with the overlap since I also have a Tamron A15 55-200mm lens (which was designed for APS-C bodies where the 278D wasn't). Now I kinda want to see if I can grab a "gently" used one. Great review, it really helps.
I have the OG EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM and it's not bad. There is some noise during focusing and as you're moving the camera around with the AF on but not a big deal for me. It takes good pictures and I have no complaints so far. I use it with a Canon EOS R10. Granted, it's nowhere near the performance of my RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 ISM USM, but it's fun to play with and it gets the job done.
I got the EF-M 55-200mm for my M50, its even better image quality and smaller. However, build quality is plasticy and ofc you miss some reach. Much better for me because together with the adapter its heavy and huge.
I found the 55-250mm without the STM, trying to find reviews of whether or not it's worth paying extra for the STM but I really enjoyed this review (and I've seen the original, still remember the shoe throw!)
Excellent presentation. I'm thinking which lens I’ll afford. 300 or 250. After watching your video I've firmly decided to take 55-250. Thank you
Great video, at 8:58 you show me what I want to see, thanks I lot, I go on 55-250mm!
Great to hear!
Because of this video i decided to bought 55-250 mm. Thanks man
75 -300 lenses are full frame but 55-250 are apsc lenses , the ratio is different I think. Is that correct?
I agree with Daniel
Love from india bro . . . Pls make a video on 70-300 is ii USM lens as i feel it's a underrated lens so far from canon who's looking for a budget lens and a replacement for the kit lens
I can tell you from experience that it kills the 75-300, but if your funds allow, get the 70-200 with a 1.4 converter the f4 works at f5.6 and is a great set up to use
Two videos in, great content, great, down to earth presence (yeah, I know you've got some spunk ;) ), video titles I look forward to viewing, the ability to resonate with this newbie photo taker, ....basically what I'm trying to say is thank you. Sold. New Sub. :)
Appreciate the kind words, glad the videos have been helpful!
The 55-250 is a problem - what if we all just look for value and sharpness.. what will the sales people do.. great video.
My 55 to 250 which I just got has a very loud auto focus. I could say worse than that 70 to 300. Honestly I got it for a really good deal and I needed a cheaper telephoto lens now and everything else works great, maybe I should get a external microphone. I can use it for years then
Is it the non-STM version? Before the most recent version there was 1 or 2 models with non-stm motors which were likely louder. Either way, glad you got a good deal!
@@JoshWiniarski ahhh it very well could be. It's the silver band which I knew was older but from what I read I saw no differences. I'm guessing that's the one. Still I am loving it, thank you for the video man :)
i also looking for a cheap tele lens for my old canon
but i can only go for 75-300 cause i using old full frame camera
but i really love the focus speed and the IS and the price of the 55-250, but there just none other in that price range to choose for EF lens
There's also the Image Stabilized 70-300mm, but it'll be more expensive unfortunately.
@@JoshWiniarski ya unfortunately the the IS USM 70-300 is much more expensive
another workaround is to mod the mount of 55-250 to fit FF body, but will got dark
image circle and will need to crop afterwards
@@JoshWiniarski : I'm getting a refurbished one for $139, it includes a hood, wide angle and telephoto lenses.
I've got the 55-250mm is arm for nearly nothing second hand and it's like brand new and I got a canon dslr with the kit too I'm happy
That's awesome, used lenses are a great option!
i have the canon 80d and i want some good lens for that camera i was told to get the 24-70 and the 16-35 but they're for full frame cameras but i have a crop sensor but they seem to take great pictures i want to get better but i'll buy lenses that will work with my 80d i don't want to be buying the wrong camera lenses. i only want a few lenses. i have 2 full frame lenses and no crop sensor lens but i'm trying to see what happens. i do this as a hobby So i'm not rich like that i paid 500 for the 80d camera body with no lenses and then i bought the 16-35 and the 50mm i took some nice pictures but i want to take sharp pictures everytime that's why i'm learning all of the camera modes to see which one i'm going to like. so can you tell me about the 17-55mm 24mm 10-18mm 55-250mm and the 18-135mm which one do i need to buy for the 80d
70-300 is full frame and good for price. But i recall having that lens and not liking it so much. Use in camera corrections and stop it down a little. I think it works pretty well for portraits specially on ff body or M series with speed booster. It is probably going to be best cheap telephoto on Canon R6. You get ibis and 20 mp isn't alot.
The 75-300 is the worst lens I have ever owned. I gave it away because selling it for more than $5 would feel criminal.
anyone know if these 2 Lenses fit the Cannon Rebel Eos T5i ? I'm new to looking to buy less any help would be highly Appreciated Thank you.
You either have depresion... Or your melatonin levels are messed up... Thats the deal when sleep affects you that way
I went with both because the 75-300 is more of a 88-400mm on crop sensor dslr :) and I also recommend people buying their lenses from mercari, found great deals on there! Only way I could get both :D
The 55-250mm is a 88-400mm lens attached to a Canon APS-C 1.6x crop sensor camera. The 75-300mm is a 120-480mm lens.
Good vid Josh. I’ve had the 55-250 for years and it’s performed admirably. Now I want to upgrade to the next level of telephoto lenses. What do you suggest? Cheers
Apologize for the late response! The first lens that comes to mind is something like a 70-200 f/4. It's definitely a big jump in price (especially if you get the Image stabilized version) but the images are super sharp! Alternatively, it might be worth looking into Sigma or Tamron lenses. Sigma has lenses like the 50-100 f/1.8 or 50-150 f/2.8. I haven't used any of these except the Canon f/4, but they might be worth researching!
this is the PERFECT video thank you SO MUCH!!
You're very welcome, glad it was helpful!
Nice comparison. I've been eyeballing the 55-250mm for some time now. I'm curious as to how it would do for kids' soccer games. You can get them used for under $100 sometimes, so I might just give it a shot. Good video. Thanks for sharing.
I've actually used it for shooting high school soccer before, and I was happy with the results! For under $100 I'd definitely give it a shot!
Yeah some people sale it really cheap
Awesome content very detail might subscribe on this one! ♥️ New subscriber from philippines
75-300 made my eclipse photos purple fringe bad. Didn’t have the 55-250 so next eclipse I’ll find out
I am copying and pasting the same as the person below me, as it is perfectly stated !!! Great video! You deserve a lot more subscribers. I think I’m going to get the 55-250.
Thank you so much for this video was trying to decide between the two, especially when trying to take a photo of a bird in mid flight. Decided to go with the 55-250mm 🙂
Glad it was helpful, hope you get some awesome photos with it!
I’ve been seeing other photographers using that lense on their kids games I think it’s a great lens from my opinion I never used it or had it I just see the good comments about it and it takes great photos so I’m thinking about it buying it soon. Thanks for your help Amigo
My pleasure, yep they're both pretty popular to see on the sidelines of kids' games!
you really are helping me with my photography Josh! thank you!
You're very welcome!
Welp I know what lens I am not buying after all lol just have to save up for the 55-250
Thank you. Your video help me decide on the right lens. I purchased the 55-300 canon for the stabilizer
So is the 55-250mm better than 75-300mm lens?
Yep, if you can afford it it's the better option!
Good video. I've had the 75-300 for a while and just picked up the 55-250 last week at a pawn shop. So far, I agree 100% with what you said in this video. Wish I'd seen this before today, would have got the 55-250 a long time ago.
If someone is selling the 55-250mm for $50 with a few spots on it will that affect the photos?
hey man just found your channel. really like the lighting you got going on! was wondering what continuous key/fill lights you use for your setup. thanks!
For a key light I just use this ua-cam.com/video/Hll25fGXCQs/v-deo.html. In the background I have an "Aukey RGB Touch Lamp", and if I'm feeling extra spicy I'll also use an Apurture M9 as well. All of those are pretty basic cheap lights but they've got my setup looking decent enough for now.
Great video! This answered so many questions I had! You made my choice to get the 55-250mm easier for my wife's birthday!
Glad I could help!
It will work corect with 4000d?
Yep, both lenses will work fine!
When I'm outdoors, the 55-250 is always on my T7i...
Can you use it with the canon 4000D camara
Does anyone use 75-300 mm lens with a teleconverter?
I already knew the winner but came to watch anyways. One point you forgot was not just that there is not that big of a difference between 250mm and 300mm, but there is a big difference between 55mm and 75mm because you may be in a position where you can't back up. I've wanted to get a EF-S 55-250mm for years but never had the money. It's my next lens to buy though.
Its good enough for my 750D ? Someone answer pls?
Thank you for your video !
You bet!
That's true. For me also 6 and half hours sleep feels very good.
You are a happy sounding guy, like that .. subscribed