Book review: Trans Philosophism by Desh Subba

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Asian philosopher Desh Subba has sent me his Magnum Opus. So this is another one of my book reviews. In this book, Subba builds on his philosophy of fearism. He ads some marxism and capitalism in the mix and moves philosophy in to a trans philosophism.
    Here is a link to my article on Fearism: www.academia.e...
    Here is a link to my video book review on Fearism: • Book Review: Philosoph...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4

  • @projectmalus
    @projectmalus Рік тому +2

    Thanks for the review, this sounds like a terrific book to have.

    • @bahadurdesh9150
      @bahadurdesh9150 Рік тому +1

      Have you heard the Philosophy of Fearism? It is an advanced stage ot it.

    • @projectmalus
      @projectmalus Рік тому +2

      @@bahadurdesh9150 I did watch the previous video but haven't read the book. Just for fun because I'm an amateur philosopher, I'll copy and paste this from my reply elsewhere.
      For the planet, one gradient level and different facets of access that creates levels. All humans as one facet that is able to acquire more of that one gradient, or so we think. But if Hegel and Ernst Cassirer are right in that mind creates objects (mind as that facet of availability from qualia and GI tract) then perhaps symbiosis is successful in aligning gradient "levels" and this works by releasing that energy by allowing a "larger" while still complex expression.
      Why do humans objectify the world? I think it's because of ingesting the grass "object" within the human "object", that this went from emergency food, ceremonial sharing to a staple. I don't expect this to be a popular idea. But I'm not saying give it up, just dial it back on an industrial scale, also sugar is a problem when production is ramped up...see an amazing video entitles 'sugar production in the Americas".
      A self objectification thru manipulation of the environment of the gut which influences the bacteria (more anaerobic for instance) and neurotransmitters. The muffling of qualia gathering tools like the nose especially. Does that affect one's self?
      Non-object self of person, between object of skin bounded and objects of organs...objects as an easier way to look at gradient access. Self between object of person and object of group, called individual. Same for world citizen, human object with others sharing the one gradient.
      By entering this gradient level of that symbiosis more fully, we take on those characteristic I think, without that balance. The all powerful grass isn't checked, the cow isn't kept intelligent by chasing the grass and being chased, the wolf can be lazy and clever, the dark triad. But only because they were objectified by allowing the sociopath of big business to introduce that as a staple.
      Feel free to respond or ignore. Thanks for reading.

    • @bahadurdesh9150
      @bahadurdesh9150 Рік тому

      @@projectmalus Great you have lots of philosophical knowledge. you can share Trans Philosophism knowledge with readers. It is a new philosophy in the world. As Kasper said, It can look at previous philosophies from this innovative lens.