I challenge any one of you people who speak in a derogatory way about walter to take the time to watch the "total onslaught" series, or "the genesis conflict", or any one of his series. They are all on youtube and I grantee he will blow your minds. This man is INCREDIBLY smart. I am convinced the Lord lead me straight to the truth through Walter. I pray for even one of you to listen and learn. : )
I was going to take your advice and watch "the genesis conflict". I enjoy the sport of demonstrating the total idiocy of the creationists, and I thought here would be a great opportunity for me. And I knew it would be really easy dealing with anything this guy puts out. Far from being "INCREDIBLY smart" as you claim, I found this "From Evolutionist to Creationist" video shows him up as incredibly IDIOTIC (see my earlier posts here), so I was really licking my chops to get stuck into "the genesis conflict". And even doubly so, because I know very well the type of South African religious fool that I detect in DR Veith. You see, I grew up among them, and hated them with a passion. It's one of the reasons I left that woeful, religiously polluted country, whose evil, self-righteous, smug, religious deviants gave the world the now infamous system of apartheid. I despise the devious, slimy way they foister the religious virus on those around them. UGGG! I want to puke now, just thinking about it! Anyway, you can imagine how disappointed I was when I saw that for the "the genesis conflict" series on youtube, comments have been disabled! Well, there's a thing now!! I wonder why that would be????!!
Great!!! You have att'er. God wins. You'll see when you get that awesome feeling that Christ is pulling the veil back and showing you that all that all that he declares is so. Then, you can either take the "blue pill" and pretend everything evolved just like they said, or you can take the "red pill" and watch 'total onslaught' and see how deep the truth goes. Either way God will Win. God Bless you on your journey and put on your seat belt. My prayers are with you Andre. : )
theresa42213"... that awesome feeling that Christ is pulling the veil back and showing you that all that he declares is so". It would really be an awesome feeling when you have the answer to all the difficult unsolved mysteries that still confront us. It's just a pity that your optimism is so totally unfounded.
Oh. I almost forgot about you Andre. I hope you're well. You may enjoy a non religious video called "Everything's a rich man's Trick" . It's LONG. However, its an incredible account of how things are in this country and indeed the world. God Bless. :)
This man and his series of lectures have been a blessing to me from God. Thank you Prof Veith and more importantly, thank you Jesus: "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." - (John 3:16, NKJV) "For He says: “In an acceptable time I have heard you, And in the day of salvation I have helped you.” Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation." (2 Corinthians 6:2, NKJV)
Great testimony that distinguishes the difference between religion, and faith. there is a VERY Big difference between God and religion, and even greater distance from religion to God and his creation - it's us folks and how much our father loves us all and wants a personal relationship with YOU.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 Well, God isn't made of a book either, He's not information, he's a source of information--I think you're conflating some stuff here. God isn't made and didn't come from anywhere. He's always been (you know, the whole alpha and omega bit). Also, I said nothing about 6,000 years ago. Don't put words in my mouth. And wrong is not what you simply declare it to be.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 No, that is where you are making a faulty assumption that the source must contain information. I only asserted intelligence. You're batting a big fat zero right there.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 We're not talking about wells and water, we're talking about information which you don't seem to have a grasp of. Information has only ever been known to come from an intelligent source. I think you should Google the "Dunning Kruger Effect" before you accuse me of ignorance, I think you're suffering from that.
What a fantastic story, brought a tear of joy to my eyes. I too have amazing stories of how the Lord has intervened in my life, I never have to worry about my next meal. God is great and Walter vaith great at what he does
Enjoy! The Evolutionary Origin of Birds This is a matter of deduction, it is all guess work. Pure fantasy and imagination based on the artificial geologic column. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which this remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved. Impossible alterations needed in order to change a reptile into a bird: A “variety of feathers” covering the bird, growth of wings, strengthening of certain muscles, higher blood sugar levels and body temperate levels, this is a drastic change, total revision of respiratory, nervous and reproductive systems, lightening of bones in order for it to fly, new digestive system and instinctive behaviours, every specie is subject to irreducible complexity. This is a problem for Darwinian Evolutionary Religion and a bridge too far for natural selection based on random mutations relative to the genome. It is not possible to have a build-up of genetic complexity. Irreducible complexity speaks for itself. They say it takes about 20 transitional forms [guesswork] to change one- specie into another. Charles Darwin said, “As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Good question Charlie! The number of intermediate links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great! A note on Comparative anatomy This not evidence for evolution. It just means that when you have a good design you use it to create a variety of species. For example: the foot, knee and ankle. Man invented the wheel, utilizing it on carts, bicycles, cars, trams, steering wheels etc. Evolution is on trial here not Creation. If there were a number of evolutionists in a room with one creationist, who do you think would have the legitimate right to throw a stone? If the creationist said to the evolutionists show me fossil evidence of macro-evolution on a grand- scale. All the evolutionists would have to leave the room one by one, beginning at the eldest to the youngest; he would be left alone in the room. The creationist would be the one that had the legitimate right to throw stones at all the evolutionists, but he could not do so. Being a Christian he would show love and have mercy upon the willingly ignorant, praying that they may come to their senses! Being caught up in evolution being your occupation when suddenly the light comes on is not an easy position to find yourself in. As one molecular biologist said to me anonymously, that he could see design in all living organisms but he could not say he didn’t believe in evolution or he would be out of a source of income, words to the effect. Objectivity of Science “One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. To be forced to believe only one conclusion that everything in the universe happened by chance [my opinion doesn’t make sense] would violate the very objectivity of science itself. They [evolutionists] challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun? It is in scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom. It would be an error to overlook that the universe was planned rather than happening by chance.” Dr. Wernher von Braun [Father of American rocket and space program] The problem today is communism and a lack of scientific honesty, because evolutionists are hostile towards belief in God. This teaching is all part of the globalist agenda which will end in tears. I would have liked to see Richard Dawkins debate a man like this.
It is difficult for me to imagine a more powerful testimony than this for the Word of God and the truth of the Gospel. Evolutionary "science" and Darwinism are nothing but sound and fury.
Stephen Gould's Conclussion - (Evolutionist) “the existence of distinct species was quite consistent with creationist tenets of a pre-Darwinian era.” (Emphasis added.) I would simply like to add that the evidence is also quite consistent with the creationist tenets of the present post-neo-Darwinian era. In Darwin’s time, as well as the present, “creation” seems to be the more logical inference from our observations.
"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progression of science. It is useless." *Louis Bounoure, Le Monde et Vie (October 1983); quoted in the Adovate , March 8, 1984. Former director of the Strasbourg Zoological Museum, later director at the French National Center for Scientific Research
The actually quote is: "Transformism is a fairy tale for adults." It was written by Jean Rostand (from Age Nouveau, February 1959, p. 12), a French biologist and philosopher who also wrote, "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses the fact of evolution." The quotation from Prof. Louis Bounoure from his book, Determinism and Finality: " That, by this, evolutionism would appear as a theory without value, is confirmed also pragmatically. A theory must not be required to be true, said Mr. H. Poincare, more or less, it must be required to be useable. Indeed, none of the progress made in biology depends even slightly on a theory, the principles of which [i.e., of how evolution occurs -- ED.] are nevertheless filling every year volumes of books, periodicals, and congresses with their discussions and their disagreements." Bounoure never served as director nor as a member of the CNRS. He was a professor of biology at the University of Strasbourg. Bounoure was a Christian but did not affirm that Genesis was to be taken to the letter. That quote was also attributed to Paul Lemoine by televangelist James D. Kennedy but people that think he was anti-evolution have seem to misunderstand what he has said. Even if these statements were made by anyone what bearing do they have on the actual science?
I was glad I did not stop watching, as this man describes his journey from atheism into the Roman Catholic Church (which is headed by some of the worlds leading occultists). But alas, I became saddened to find he came but "half-way" to the Truth, by accepting the 'cult' of Seventh-Day Advent-ism.
***** Well all protestants are cults th bible says so in revelation, that the great woe, andh her many harlots, the greate woe is the roman catholic church and her harlots are her bibles, the protestants
also studies into the molecular clock that is mitochondrial cells (the power behind our cell formation) only goes back to mitochondrial eve and is 6000 year old
You're personal life testimony is so inspiring and encouraging to stay steadfast to our faith till Jesus comes. It is giving us a lot of spiritual enlightenment to hold on to our faith and trust God completely with everything in our life. It also tells us that no matter how hard we would go through and are going through, Jesus walks side by side with us and He's out there together with His holy angels to protect us and the holy spirit to guide us to do the will of God and be obedient to him. You also inspire us to continue reading the word of God which is the Bible, for it is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path. May God continue to give you strength as you preach the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ as it goes globally even to the remotest area of the earth. Thank you for sharing your blessings of truth to us as it blesses us too. Thank you for your brave and courageous personal testimony to share to each and everyone of us and gives us strength to walk towards God and all those who hears it.May God bless you more and your whole family.
Objective fact : Both Creation and Evolution are first and foremost "Religions", ergo they are both functioning upon "Faith". Therefore it comes down to which one makes more intellectual, logical sense. Inference to the best explanation is an ID ( Intelligent Designer/Agent ).
My own experience with the occult spirits verifies all that Doctor Walter says. I know he teaches the TRUTH. I have found it independently from him. YHWH be praised. HalleluYAH!
DARWIN PROVED HIS THEORY A DELUSION - YEAR 2013 (154 years after) "The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on Earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory."
(2 of 2) 4. DNA transcription is an encoding / decoding mechanism isomorphic with Claude Shannon’s 1948 model: The sequence of base pairs is encoded into messenger RNA which is decoded into proteins. 5. Information theory terms and ideas applied to DNA are not metaphorical, but in fact quite literal in every way. In other words, the information theory argument for design is not based on analogy at all. It is direct application of mathematics to DNA, which by definition is a code.
to your second quote i noticed you didnt actually show what it is. what it says is this "If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death-the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you." it doesnt deal with rapeing situation. simply a woman engaged to someone else
What is observed in speciation is changes involve only the conservation or decay of the underlying gentic information, which has limits to variations. So the evolution is not observerd in speciation at all.
"Science deals with the objective, the truth of the mind. Religion deals with the subjective, things that cannot be understood by the mind. People do not think they are compatible. They are not only compatible, they are both essential to learning and living in the ultimate truth. Science asks “how.” Religions ask “why.”- M. Smith. Make the two one and open your eyes to the complete picture, go to the truth contest website and open the present (with religion).
Any time one of the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 10:6; 15:24) turn to the Master Yahusha (Lord Jesus), as Mr. Veith shows he has done, there is a party in the heavens, per the Master's declaration of Luke 15:1-7--another lost sheep home! One thing is sure: There is no such thing as a church or a synagogue or whatever that saves anybody from the 2nd death and for everlasting life but only the Master Yahusha. Praised be His Name for the way He has worked in every life He has saved, and certainly including Mr. Veith, amein.
STEPHEN GOULD AGAINST GRADUALISM (1980a: 182) later expressed the problem succinctly: 2 OF 2 (2) Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed.'
id have loved to see that when Walter tells the whole assembly that evolution a 2000 year old pagan religion of the greeks (Animaxanda) is impossible hahaha
Trivia: theres a species of lizard(Eurycea rathbuni). It has lost its eyes over probably few generations while it lived in the dark, lightless caves of Texas. More examples are: Stygichthys typhlops, Proteus anguinus, Xenotyphlops mocquardi. They have had adapted to low light environment not for millions of years, but just for few generations.
It doesn't matter whether there is evolution or not; whatever happens on this planet is a divine plan and it is all done through and by God. Does that make sense?
STEPHEN GOULD AGAINST GRADUALISM (1980a: 182) later expressed the problem succinctly: 1 OF 2 The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism:(1.) Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless. TO BE CONTINUED....
"Why don't your commandments include genocide?" .... last I checked, genocide is killing. Which if I recall correctly is briefly mentioned in the commandments... maybe I'm wrong?
I'm not keen on the term 'evolutionist'. I would equally consider myself a 'gravity-ist' or an 'atomist'. But, I'm content with the term 'methodological naturalist'.
'' Noah took the babies '' Actually that makes it even more complicated. Cubs, foals, etc. Require food from the parent in form of breast milk and similar things. The baby would not survive for long without the mother. Also, if all the animals were vegan where did Noah get all the food from? Did he have a giant ass plantation floating above the boat or what?
I am wating for him to answer the question to because we know ID predicts Irreducible complexity "Darwin evolutin and natural selection could not have been the cause because they require replication to operate, and there was no replication prior to the orgion of life, but no other known cause can organize the information in Life." - Joseph A. Kuhn, "Dissenting from Darwinism", Baylor University Medical Center Proceeding, Vol 25 (1) 41-47 (2012) A "Peered Revied Journal" with ID in it..
it's no point attempting to reason with the wilfully blind - though i guess, have a voice of reason in amongst all these fools might be a worthy objective
Good presentation with the exception of pushing the 7th-day adventist doctrine. I just think Prof Veith has to go through one more iteration to get it right. Thank you.
Part 2/2: Still, every single organelle in every cell lacks DNA(they simply couldnt divide or synthise proteins they needed). You might answer - its because they lost it through those millions of years. But to work properly a cell needs only one DNA chain(in nucleus) and no more. Otherwise there is a conflict and all living mechanisms are sabotaged(like in the situation when you have viral or bacterial infection). So, did mitochondium lost its DNA before or after the merger? Both ways are imposs
I'm a bit perplexed why you would quote these two studies. Are you saying you support the theory of evolution and the fact that the earth is about 5 billion years old?
Todd Preuss -"It is nowclear that the gentic diferences between humans and chipanzess are far more extensive than previously thought: their genome are not 98% or 99% identical PNAS (2012) 109: 10709 -10716 It is some where between 86% or 76% two great pappers are Ebersberger, I et al. 2007. Mapping Hum,an Gentic Ancestry Molecar biology and Evolution 24 (10) 226-2276 Scally 2012. Insight into homid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature. 483 (7388 169-175)
in that co-operation between individuals leads to a great chance of everyone surviving. The Australian Aborigine has the longest continuous culture in the world and until 200 years ago had no religion resembling the bronze age rubbish that was practiced in a tiny part of the world. Yet they had a very moral culture. Same as the Chinese. When the Midianite tribes were illiterate the Chinese had complex writing. No God to guide their morality, yet they held to human ideals and survived. Finally
I LOVE listening to~ and learning so many POWERFUL TRUTHS of GOD & THIS INCREDIBLE REALITY~ IN WHICH ALL of HIS CREATIONS~ LIVE, & MOVE.and HAVE THEIR BEING!! THOSE WHO DESPISE WHAT THEY "A S S U M E " TRUE CHRISTIANITY = IS ~ AND ~. WHAT THE WORD of GOD- TEACHES =. ARE BIBLICALLY & SPIRITUALLY ILLITERATE ~ BUT, THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE LIE, THAT MAKES THEM REJECT THE TRUTH= IS THE FALSE, PAGAN IDEA of ETERNAL TORTURE IN HELL!!- THAT CONSTANTINE of ROME~ ADDED THIS WICKED LIE= to The New Testament
No, it goes beyond that. Your everyday random molecule doesn't carry information in the sense that DNA does. And yes, if you change it, you create new information. If I change a constant in my code, then that's new information too. If you change information, it becomes new information. What's strange about that?
Search Qualia Soup, Good without Gods on You Tube..It won't let me simply post the link I doubt you'll understand the concepts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
And what apparatus did you use exactly to determine that this 6th finger is a mutation? Maybe my nose is a mutation too? Why God did not put an oxygen machine in my head? Dont you think it would be a bit problematic? From polish Wikipedia: "The front legs are equipped with 6th finger, movable and opposed to the other. Developed from one of wristbones". So basically Its not a second thumb, it is a thumb and 5 fingers. Its not a mutation-it appears in every panda offspring(And wristbone WAS there)
Logical doesn't mean it's right. Anything can seem logical, but completely wrong. Why should results need to constantly change? Why not solid results with extended observations on what is already known? The "barbaric" book consists of the origins of man and the universe, the fall of man, the role man plays, historical events, foreseen events, which are accurate to the letter, and what will happen in the future.Science theories have no foundation on any of that. My faith lays with the bible.
1) '' They weigh less to the Ark wont be as heavy '' True, but it will still weigh A SHIT TON and there still wont be enough room for all animals 2) Yes they will live longer but without the teachings of the mother ( talking about cubs ) they wont survive for long at all. 3) '' They don't need as much food '' True, but all the food would still weigh A SHIT TON. Probably more than the boat itself ( with all the animals in it )
Oh and one other thing. I wasn't picked on at school. Thankfully in my country we embrace atheism in our education system as we do science. We are taught to think for ourselves, to learn and to question. I have had a rough life at times but I don't blame a non existent sky fairy. Life is life. We live, we learn and we hopefully leave without making too much of a mess. As far as acting like a "smartass". Rather be seen as smart than as an ignorant hick.
Because I don't accept the Catholic church, I'm definitely not Catholic and it does violate the scriptural account. Why can't you accept that other people have differing ideas to your own?
....which means the father only gives the daughter away hence in the end the father decides whether to marry off his daughter or not. marrying is better for the daughter as if pregnancy occurs while she is unmarried, she will be at shame in those cultures. in a way it puts her in a favorable position. understand the context.
Science asks how, philosophy asks why, religion tells you how, what and why without accepting questions or critisism. "Religion deals with the subjective, things that cannot be understood by the mind" If it can not be understood by the mind then it can not be understood, so why even bother with it.
I see. When put like that, I think it's a fine position. =) But many creationists consider evolution a religion, and therefore use the term "evolutionist" to misappropriate the nomenclature.
I want to correct myself - i was talking about calcium carbonate. How can you call a layer of calcium carbonate, hmm maybe "layer of calcium carbonate"? Funny how for example ostrich has it's legs attached on the opposite sides of pelvis - just like today's lizards. The way it moves forced the legs to be "under" the body while slow, four-legged movement favors lizard-like setup. But dinosaur cant run like ostrich, its cold-blooded creature(as evolutionists-geniuses say)..
you just read the words. Ask any theologian ( who are experts in the field than you) what this means. the 1st quote as you see will punish the rapist. the original text in Hebrew doesn't say rape. it says if he SEDUCES a woman not his betrothed to have sex he is punished by marrying her. would u wanna marry some1 you randomly had sex with? note it says "you shall not divorce her" it places aburded on the man. finaly he pays to the father and THEN he should marry her which means
Ok. But you do understand that both studies you quoted don't question (but even confirm) the common ancestor of humans and apes. That true testing we now find out that we may be closer to Gorilla's then chimps and that the split form our common ancestor happened longer ago is just the beauty of the self correcting nature of science. There are also more transitional fossils, I could quote some of them but I would just be copying Wikipedia and that's just dumb.
2/2 One ancestor you would say. The difference within a kind is called a variety within a kind. You misunderstood the term 'species' because wolf and a dog are not the same species. They are the same kind(sometimes its even impossible for different species within one kind to give birth to a fertile offspring -some species of slug for example cant pair at all due to significant changes in the expression of genes in their genom). Post more of your evidences. I'll gladly prove them wrong for you ;)
There are countless surveys of religious belief in scientists. Nature magazine has a good one.As far as Einstein "Albert Einstein's religious views have been studied extensively. He said he believed in the god of Baruch Spinoza, but not in a personal god, a belief he criticized. He also called himself an agnostic, and criticized atheism, preferring he said "an attitude of humility." If you look up Spinoza he didn't believe in any form of Abrahamic god as described in the bible..So wrong again.
Oh and by the way..Before I noticed your reply I was busy working towards my masters in theoretical physics..I've just spent 2 weeks reading Green, Hawking and Michio Kaku to try and understand this side of the physical world that has nothing to do with God..I imagine you are ace in your bible study group. Personally I think you are a metal pygmy. Do you watch Big bang Theory on TV. I'm Sheldon, though I am married and don't have Aspergers. Plus I hold dual degrees in Anatomy and physiology.
"Paleontology is a historical science, a science based on circumstantial evidence, after the fact. We can never reach hard and fast conclusions. These days it's easy to go through school for a good many years, sometimes even through college, without ever hearing that some sciencies are historical or by nature inconclusive." John Horner so where is the evidence?
I love science only without evolution delusion, science is for all people regardless of belief. What creationists hate is the attempt of evolutionist-atheist to deprive creationists doing science just because of religion not knowing evolution also is a religion. Let the scientific proof speaks as long it is inside the scoop of true science
@@johnellg9399no. He's literally saying you can connect to unrelated things as being connected with no evidence other than they happen near the same time
The Roman catholic church, amongst other things, also forbids birth control, does not really prosecute priests who molest little children, and you trust their judgement?
![[Pascal Picq] Lucy et l'obscurantisme](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hOsPiW5yDnA/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Origin of Life: Evolution vs. Design [Full Debate]](/img/n.gif)
What a great testimony. I love hearing how people come to Jesus .
I challenge any one of you people who speak in a derogatory way about walter to take the time to watch the "total onslaught" series, or "the genesis conflict", or any one of his series. They are all on youtube and I grantee he will blow your minds. This man is INCREDIBLY smart. I am convinced the Lord lead me straight to the truth through Walter. I pray for even one of you to listen and learn. : )
I was going to take your advice and watch "the genesis conflict". I enjoy the sport of demonstrating the total idiocy of the creationists, and I thought here would be a great opportunity for me. And I knew it would be really easy dealing with anything this guy puts out. Far from being "INCREDIBLY smart" as you claim, I found this "From Evolutionist to Creationist" video shows him up as incredibly IDIOTIC (see my earlier posts here), so I was really licking my chops to get stuck into "the genesis conflict". And even doubly so, because I know very well the type of South African religious fool that I detect in DR Veith. You see, I grew up among them, and hated them with a passion. It's one of the reasons I left that woeful, religiously polluted country, whose evil, self-righteous, smug, religious deviants gave the world the now infamous system of apartheid. I despise the devious, slimy way they foister the religious virus on those around them. UGGG! I want to puke now, just thinking about it! Anyway, you can imagine how disappointed I was when I saw that for the "the genesis conflict" series on youtube, comments have been disabled! Well, there's a thing now!! I wonder why that would be????!!
Great!!! You have att'er. God wins. You'll see when you get that awesome feeling that Christ is pulling the veil back and showing you that all that all that he declares is so. Then, you can either take the "blue pill" and pretend everything evolved just like they said, or you can take the "red pill" and watch 'total onslaught' and see how deep the truth goes. Either way God will Win. God Bless you on your journey and put on your seat belt. My prayers are with you Andre. : )
theresa42213"... that awesome feeling that Christ is pulling the veil back and showing you that all that he declares is so". It would really be an awesome feeling when you have the answer to all the difficult unsolved mysteries that still confront us. It's just a pity that your optimism is so totally unfounded.
Thank you for reading and agreeing w/ my comment. Good to know that others are watching him. God Bless. :)
Oh. I almost forgot about you Andre. I hope you're well. You may enjoy a non religious video called "Everything's a rich man's Trick" . It's LONG. However, its an incredible account of how things are in this country and indeed the world. God Bless. :)
WOOW, I'm a Muslim sister and he's story really amazes me, may God bless us all, Amen
you may watch 'islamic connection' by walter veith
This man and his series of lectures have been a blessing to me from God. Thank you Prof Veith and more importantly, thank you Jesus:
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." - (John 3:16, NKJV)
"For He says:
“In an acceptable time I have heard you,
And in the day of salvation I have helped you.”
Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation." (2 Corinthians 6:2, NKJV)
Finding Mr. Veith in 2022. This is incredible to hear and see.
You are really using all your talents
Well done faithful servant
Blessings from Yahuah for blessing us
Esther Fisher
Great testimony that distinguishes the difference between religion, and faith. there is a VERY Big difference between God and religion, and even greater distance from religion to God and his creation - it's us folks and how much our father loves us all and wants a personal relationship with YOU.
Information can only come from an intelligent source. Your DNA is full of information.
That is not even wrong
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 You think God has DNA?
Also, I love when someone takes issue with a comment I wrote over SIX YEARS AGO.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 Well, God isn't made of a book either, He's not information, he's a source of information--I think you're conflating some stuff here. God isn't made and didn't come from anywhere. He's always been (you know, the whole alpha and omega bit).
Also, I said nothing about 6,000 years ago. Don't put words in my mouth. And wrong is not what you simply declare it to be.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 No, that is where you are making a faulty assumption that the source must contain information. I only asserted intelligence. You're batting a big fat zero right there.
@@jarlaxledaerthe4045 We're not talking about wells and water, we're talking about information which you don't seem to have a grasp of. Information has only ever been known to come from an intelligent source. I think you should Google the "Dunning Kruger Effect" before you accuse me of ignorance, I think you're suffering from that.
What a fantastic story, brought a tear of joy to my eyes. I too have amazing stories of how the Lord has intervened in my life, I never have to worry about my next meal. God is great and Walter vaith great at what he does
Quite incredible. Walter's testimony is like a book from the old testament.
Thank you so much Professor Veith! Beautiful beautiful testimony!
Enjoy! The Evolutionary Origin of Birds
This is a matter of deduction, it is all guess work. Pure fantasy and imagination based on the artificial geologic column. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which this remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved. Impossible alterations needed in order to change a reptile into a bird: A “variety of feathers” covering the bird, growth of wings, strengthening of certain muscles, higher blood sugar levels and body temperate levels, this is a drastic change, total revision of respiratory, nervous and reproductive systems, lightening of bones in order for it to fly, new digestive system and instinctive behaviours, every specie is subject to irreducible complexity. This is a problem for Darwinian Evolutionary Religion and a bridge too far for natural selection based on random mutations relative to the genome. It is not possible to have a build-up of genetic complexity. Irreducible complexity speaks for itself. They say it takes about 20 transitional forms [guesswork] to change one- specie into another. Charles Darwin said, “As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Good question Charlie! The number of intermediate links between all living and extinct species must have been inconceivably great!
A note on Comparative anatomy
This not evidence for evolution. It just means that when you have a good design you use it to create a variety of species. For example: the foot, knee and ankle. Man invented the wheel, utilizing it on carts, bicycles, cars, trams, steering wheels etc.
Evolution is on trial here not Creation.
If there were a number of evolutionists in a room with one creationist, who do you think would have the legitimate right to throw a stone? If the creationist said to the evolutionists show me fossil evidence of macro-evolution on a grand- scale. All the evolutionists would have to leave the room one by one, beginning at the eldest to the youngest; he would be left alone in the room. The creationist would be the one that had the legitimate right to throw stones at all the evolutionists, but he could not do so. Being a Christian he would show love and have mercy upon the willingly ignorant, praying that they may come to their senses! Being caught up in evolution being your occupation when suddenly the light comes on is not an easy position to find yourself in. As one molecular biologist said to me anonymously, that he could see design in all living organisms but he could not say he didn’t believe in evolution or he would be out of a source of income, words to the effect.
Objectivity of Science
“One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. To be forced to believe only one conclusion that everything in the universe happened by chance [my opinion doesn’t make sense] would violate the very objectivity of science itself. They [evolutionists] challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun? It is in scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom. It would be an error to overlook that the universe was planned rather than happening by chance.”
Dr. Wernher von Braun [Father of American rocket and space program]
The problem today is communism and a lack of scientific honesty, because evolutionists are hostile towards belief in God. This teaching is all part of the globalist agenda which will end in tears.
I would have liked to see Richard Dawkins debate a man like this.
It is difficult for me to imagine a more powerful testimony than this for the Word of God and the truth of the Gospel. Evolutionary "science" and Darwinism are nothing but sound and fury.
Very happy for your Professor Veith, God bless!
Stephen Gould's Conclussion - (Evolutionist)
“the existence of distinct species was quite consistent with creationist tenets of a pre-Darwinian era.” (Emphasis added.) I would simply like to add that the evidence is also quite consistent with the creationist tenets of the present post-neo-Darwinian era. In Darwin’s time, as well as the present, “creation” seems to be the more logical inference from our observations.
What a marvelous personal miraculous story from Mr. Walter Veith.
wow !! Jesus always does the right thing
That's right !
Always! :)
Will Haskew you will be called the least loved of Christ if you make it to heaven
I'm guessing those who presume to speak for Christ will have that title.
Powerful and profound testimony by Dr. Veith.
are you a seventh day?
more like vastly misinformed
@@D3nchanter how?
"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progression of science. It is useless." *Louis Bounoure, Le Monde et Vie (October 1983); quoted in the Adovate , March 8, 1984. Former director of the Strasbourg Zoological Museum, later director at the French National Center for Scientific Research
Biological Evolution is an observed fact, the Theory of Evolution is our explanation of that. Creationism is a denial of reality.
The actually quote is: "Transformism is a fairy tale for adults." It was written by Jean Rostand (from Age Nouveau, February 1959, p. 12), a French biologist and philosopher who also wrote, "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses the fact of evolution."
The quotation from Prof. Louis Bounoure from his book, Determinism and Finality: " That, by this, evolutionism would appear as a theory without value, is confirmed also pragmatically. A theory must not be required to be true, said Mr. H. Poincare, more or less, it must be required to be useable. Indeed, none of the progress made in biology depends even slightly on a theory, the principles of which [i.e., of how evolution occurs -- ED.] are nevertheless filling every year volumes of books, periodicals, and congresses with their discussions and their disagreements."
Bounoure never served as director nor as a member of the CNRS. He was a professor of biology at the University of Strasbourg. Bounoure was a Christian but did not affirm that Genesis was to be taken to the letter.
That quote was also attributed to Paul Lemoine by televangelist James D. Kennedy but people that think he was anti-evolution have seem to misunderstand what he has said.
Even if these statements were made by anyone what bearing do they have on the actual science?
he was using military time ie 14:00 is 2:00 pm
Thank you so much! What a wonderful testimony!
I was glad I did not stop watching, as this man describes his journey from atheism into the Roman Catholic Church (which is headed by some of the worlds leading occultists).
But alas, I became saddened to find he came but "half-way" to the Truth, by accepting the 'cult' of Seventh-Day Advent-ism.
Nope. but they are still cultic.
'Religion' does not necessarily equate with Christianity, Spirituality, or even with the original message and intentions of the founder!
Yes it is a pity , and they seem to have a certain personality .
***** Not even ...
***** Well all protestants are cults th bible says so in revelation, that the great woe, andh her many harlots, the greate woe is the roman catholic church and her harlots are her bibles, the protestants
Great teacher this dude!
I am amazed at how many turns this story took! Just when you guess where it's going to end, something else happened to him. Wow.
An amazing testimony.
Seventh-day Adventist fans of Jesus It is just such a pity he is confused about the Sabbath!
Looks like your the confused one.
The Bible is true, not your assertions.
So many amazing thing happened with Walter J. Veith that God had no quota to do amazing thing for anyone.
The 'Amen' was for the preaching of Walter J. Veith
also studies into the molecular clock that is mitochondrial cells (the power behind our cell formation) only goes back to mitochondrial eve and is 6000 year old
You're personal life testimony is so inspiring and encouraging to stay steadfast to our faith till Jesus comes. It is giving us a lot of spiritual enlightenment to hold on to our faith and trust God completely with everything in our life. It also tells us that no matter how hard we would go through and are going through, Jesus walks side by side with us and He's out there together with His holy angels to protect us and the holy spirit to guide us to do the will of God and be obedient to him. You also inspire us to continue reading the word of God which is the Bible, for it is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path. May God continue to give you strength as you preach the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ as it goes globally even to the remotest area of the earth. Thank you for sharing your blessings of truth to us as it blesses us too. Thank you for your brave and courageous personal testimony to share to each and everyone of us and gives us strength to walk towards God and all those who hears it.May God bless you more and your whole family.
Objective fact : Both Creation and Evolution are first and foremost "Religions", ergo they are both functioning upon "Faith". Therefore it comes down to which one makes more intellectual, logical sense. Inference to the best explanation is an ID ( Intelligent Designer/Agent ).
My own experience with the occult spirits verifies all that Doctor Walter says. I know he teaches the TRUTH. I have found it independently from him. YHWH be praised. HalleluYAH!
Jesus is the Way the Truth the Light and the Door the only one that I adore
DARWIN PROVED HIS THEORY A DELUSION - YEAR 2013 (154 years after)
"The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on Earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory."
Thank you for the truth!
Thank you for that...
Let me ask you how do you know RNA infections (similar to HIV) crossed over from the animal kingdom to humans?
So what happen on the plane did you get to see the 'firetruck" or did you poop a little and could not see the "firetruck"?
I was once a gravitationalist now I'm a Noahs arkist.
exactly. Sunday is the first day if Saturday is the seventh. and Friday is the 6th.
(2 of 2)
4. DNA transcription is an encoding / decoding mechanism isomorphic with Claude Shannon’s 1948 model: The sequence of base pairs is encoded into messenger RNA which is decoded into proteins.
5. Information theory terms and ideas applied to DNA are not metaphorical, but in fact quite literal in every way. In other words, the information theory argument for design is not based on analogy at all. It is direct application of mathematics to DNA, which by definition is a code.
to your second quote i noticed you didnt actually show what it is. what it says is this "If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death-the young woman because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man’s wife. You must purge the evil from among you." it doesnt deal with rapeing situation. simply a woman engaged to someone else
What is observed in speciation is changes involve only the conservation or decay of the underlying gentic information, which has limits to variations. So the evolution is not observerd in speciation at all.
nice to know he came to realize his great great great grandfather was not a rock.
keep thinking sir
@coyote2625 what a lovely way for you to talk about others
i have the dvd its awesome! im am only nine, the nephew of the acount owner of brad1andrew2dale3
Aight I'll check it out
"Science deals with the objective, the truth of the mind. Religion deals with the subjective, things that cannot be understood by the mind. People do not think they are compatible. They are not only compatible, they are both essential to learning and living in the ultimate truth. Science asks “how.” Religions ask “why.”- M. Smith. Make the two one and open your eyes to the complete picture, go to the truth contest website and open the present (with religion).
He reminds me of The Pink Panther Peter Sellers. PS was funny but WJV is an Adventist and is sharing his knowledge abundantly.
Any time one of the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 10:6; 15:24) turn to the Master Yahusha (Lord Jesus), as Mr. Veith shows he has done, there is a party in the heavens, per the Master's declaration of Luke 15:1-7--another lost sheep home!
One thing is sure: There is no such thing as a church or a synagogue or whatever that saves anybody from the 2nd death and for everlasting life but only the Master Yahusha. Praised be His Name for the way He has worked in every life He has saved, and certainly including Mr. Veith, amein.
You don't have to "believe" it... it is what it is, and what it is is reality. Reality is, fortunately, not subject to human opinion.
The foundations of taxonomy, yes. Foundations are Carl Linneus' >invention
understanding evolution is understanding that it is not possible.
As a software designer, I'd refer to that as code reuse.
These days, Veith to me, is the Clint Eastwood of Bible Study.
STEPHEN GOULD AGAINST GRADUALISM (1980a: 182) later expressed the problem succinctly: 2 OF 2
(2) Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed.'
id have loved to see that when Walter tells the whole assembly that evolution a 2000 year old pagan religion of the greeks (Animaxanda) is impossible hahaha
Trivia: theres a species of lizard(Eurycea rathbuni). It has lost its eyes over probably few generations while it lived in the dark, lightless caves of Texas. More examples are: Stygichthys typhlops, Proteus anguinus, Xenotyphlops mocquardi. They have had adapted to low light environment not for millions of years, but just for few generations.
It doesn't matter whether there is evolution or not; whatever happens on this planet is a divine plan and it is all done through and by God. Does that make sense?
STEPHEN GOULD AGAINST GRADUALISM (1980a: 182) later expressed the problem succinctly: 1 OF 2
The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism:(1.) Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless. TO BE CONTINUED....
"Why don't your commandments include genocide?"
.... last I checked, genocide is killing. Which if I recall correctly is briefly mentioned in the commandments... maybe I'm wrong?
Oh yeah, and good day to you too sir
I'm not keen on the term 'evolutionist'. I would equally consider myself a 'gravity-ist' or an 'atomist'.
But, I'm content with the term 'methodological naturalist'.
Amen brother !!
'' Noah took the babies ''
Actually that makes it even more complicated. Cubs, foals, etc. Require food from the parent in form of breast milk and similar things. The baby would not survive for long without the mother.
Also, if all the animals were vegan where did Noah get all the food from? Did he have a giant ass plantation floating above the boat or what?
I am wating for him to answer the question to because we know ID predicts Irreducible complexity "Darwin evolutin and natural selection could not have been the cause because they require replication to operate, and there was no replication prior to the orgion of life, but no other known cause can organize the information in Life." - Joseph A. Kuhn, "Dissenting from Darwinism", Baylor University Medical Center Proceeding, Vol 25 (1) 41-47 (2012) A "Peered Revied Journal" with ID in it..
it's no point attempting to reason with the wilfully blind - though i guess, have a voice of reason in amongst all these fools might be a worthy objective
Good presentation with the exception of pushing the 7th-day adventist doctrine.
I just think Prof Veith has to go through one more iteration to get it right.
Thank you.
seventh day adventist doctrine is biblical.just try to open your mi d.
seventh adventist doctrine is biblical.
There's only One source from which you get your truth I.e. The Eternal God who created the universe. God bless you richly.
Does that mean the Bible is true?
As the bible is self contradictory, it cannot be true.
So with all this Emperical EVIDENCE WHY DON'T YOU START CHOSING A SUBJECT AND DEPAT IT INSTEAD OF STATING NAMES?
Part 2/2: Still, every single organelle in every cell lacks DNA(they simply couldnt divide or synthise proteins they needed). You might answer - its because they lost it through those millions of years. But to work properly a cell needs only one DNA chain(in nucleus) and no more. Otherwise there is a conflict and all living mechanisms are sabotaged(like in the situation when you have viral or bacterial infection). So, did mitochondium lost its DNA before or after the merger? Both ways are imposs
they worship of friday?
So we see a intelligent designer right
I'm a bit perplexed why you would quote these two studies. Are you saying you support the theory of evolution and the fact that the earth is about 5 billion years old?
Todd Preuss -"It is nowclear that the gentic diferences between humans and chipanzess are far more extensive than previously thought: their genome are not 98% or 99% identical PNAS (2012) 109: 10709 -10716
It is some where between 86% or 76% two great pappers are
Ebersberger, I et al. 2007. Mapping Hum,an Gentic Ancestry Molecar biology and Evolution 24 (10) 226-2276
Scally 2012. Insight into homid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature. 483 (7388 169-175)
in that co-operation between individuals leads to a great chance of everyone surviving. The Australian Aborigine has the longest continuous culture in the world and until 200 years ago had no religion resembling the bronze age rubbish that was practiced in a tiny part of the world. Yet they had a very moral culture. Same as the Chinese. When the Midianite tribes were illiterate the Chinese had complex writing. No God to guide their morality, yet they held to human ideals and survived. Finally
Yeah, it happens all by itself. I don't have to type or anything. Bugs keep fixing themselves, new features are added. Magic!
I LOVE listening to~ and learning so many POWERFUL TRUTHS of GOD & THIS INCREDIBLE REALITY~ IN WHICH ALL of HIS CREATIONS~ LIVE, & MOVE.and HAVE THEIR BEING!! THOSE WHO DESPISE WHAT THEY "A S S U M E " TRUE CHRISTIANITY = IS ~ AND ~. WHAT THE WORD of GOD- TEACHES =. ARE BIBLICALLY & SPIRITUALLY ILLITERATE ~ BUT, THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE LIE, THAT MAKES THEM REJECT THE TRUTH= IS THE FALSE, PAGAN IDEA of ETERNAL TORTURE IN HELL!!- THAT CONSTANTINE of ROME~ ADDED THIS WICKED LIE= to The New Testament
No, it goes beyond that. Your everyday random molecule doesn't carry information in the sense that DNA does. And yes, if you change it, you create new information. If I change a constant in my code, then that's new information too. If you change information, it becomes new information. What's strange about that?
Search Qualia Soup, Good without Gods on You Tube..It won't let me simply post the link
I doubt you'll understand the concepts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
And what apparatus did you use exactly to determine that this 6th finger is a mutation? Maybe my nose is a mutation too? Why God did not put an oxygen machine in my head? Dont you think it would be a bit problematic? From polish Wikipedia: "The front legs are equipped with 6th finger, movable and opposed to the other. Developed from one of wristbones". So basically Its not a second thumb, it is a thumb and 5 fingers. Its not a mutation-it appears in every panda offspring(And wristbone WAS there)
Logical doesn't mean it's right. Anything can seem logical, but completely wrong. Why should results need to constantly change? Why not solid results with extended observations on what is already known?
The "barbaric" book consists of the origins of man and the universe, the fall of man, the role man plays, historical events, foreseen events, which are accurate to the letter, and what will happen in the future.Science theories have no foundation on any of that. My faith lays with the bible.
1) '' They weigh less to the Ark wont be as heavy '' True, but it will still weigh A SHIT TON and there still wont be enough room for all animals
2) Yes they will live longer but without the teachings of the mother ( talking about cubs ) they wont survive for long at all.
3) '' They don't need as much food '' True, but all the food would still weigh A SHIT TON. Probably more than the boat itself ( with all the animals in it )
Oh and one other thing. I wasn't picked on at school. Thankfully in my country we embrace atheism in our education system as we do science. We are taught to think for ourselves, to learn and to question. I have had a rough life at times but I don't blame a non existent sky fairy. Life is life. We live, we learn and we hopefully leave without making too much of a mess. As far as acting like a "smartass". Rather be seen as smart than as an ignorant hick.
Because I don't accept the Catholic church, I'm definitely not Catholic and it does violate the scriptural account. Why can't you accept that other people have differing ideas to your own?
So he went backwards?
Amen. God is good. Good thing i'm not an arrogant atheist.
....which means the father only gives the daughter away hence in the end the father decides whether to marry off his daughter or not. marrying is better for the daughter as if pregnancy occurs while she is unmarried, she will be at shame in those cultures. in a way it puts her in a favorable position. understand the context.
Science asks how, philosophy asks why, religion tells you how, what and why without accepting questions or critisism.
"Religion deals with the subjective, things that cannot be understood by the mind" If it can not be understood by the mind then it can not be understood, so why even bother with it.
I see. When put like that, I think it's a fine position. =)
But many creationists consider evolution a religion, and therefore use the term "evolutionist" to misappropriate the nomenclature.
I want to correct myself - i was talking about calcium carbonate. How can you call a layer of calcium carbonate, hmm maybe "layer of calcium carbonate"? Funny how for example ostrich has it's legs attached on the opposite sides of pelvis - just like today's lizards. The way it moves forced the legs to be "under" the body while slow, four-legged movement favors lizard-like setup. But dinosaur cant run like ostrich, its cold-blooded creature(as evolutionists-geniuses say)..
well dude you obviously haven't heard of any recent miracles in the medicine field. google it.
you just read the words. Ask any theologian ( who are experts in the field than you) what this means. the 1st quote as you see will punish the rapist. the original text in Hebrew doesn't say rape. it says if he SEDUCES a woman not his betrothed to have sex he is punished by marrying her. would u wanna marry some1 you randomly had sex with? note it says "you shall not divorce her" it places aburded on the man. finaly he pays to the father and THEN he should marry her which means
Ok. But you do understand that both studies you quoted don't question (but even confirm) the common ancestor of humans and apes. That true testing we now find out that we may be closer to Gorilla's then chimps and that the split form our common ancestor happened longer ago is just the beauty of the self correcting nature of science. There are also more transitional fossils, I could quote some of them but I would just be copying Wikipedia and that's just dumb.
2/2 One ancestor you would say. The difference within a kind is called a variety within a kind. You misunderstood the term 'species' because wolf and a dog are not the same species. They are the same kind(sometimes its even impossible for different species within one kind to give birth to a fertile offspring -some species of slug for example cant pair at all due to significant changes in the expression of genes in their genom). Post more of your evidences. I'll gladly prove them wrong for you ;)
There are countless surveys of religious belief in scientists. Nature magazine has a good one.As far as Einstein "Albert Einstein's religious views have been studied extensively. He said he believed in the god of Baruch Spinoza, but not in a personal god, a belief he criticized. He also called himself an agnostic, and criticized atheism, preferring he said "an attitude of humility." If you look up Spinoza he didn't believe in any form of Abrahamic god as described in the bible..So wrong again.
Oh and by the way..Before I noticed your reply I was busy working towards my masters in theoretical physics..I've just spent 2 weeks reading Green, Hawking and Michio Kaku to try and understand this side of the physical world that has nothing to do with God..I imagine you are ace in your bible study group. Personally I think you are a metal pygmy. Do you watch Big bang Theory on TV. I'm Sheldon, though I am married and don't have Aspergers. Plus I hold dual degrees in Anatomy and physiology.
worldly honors is nothing if you dont believe in God.whatever you have is His bestowal on you.created beings have nothing to brag for.
"Paleontology is a historical science, a science based on circumstantial evidence, after the fact. We can never reach hard and fast conclusions. These days it's easy to go through school for a good many years, sometimes even through college, without ever hearing that some sciencies are historical or by nature inconclusive." John Horner so where is the evidence?
I love science only without evolution delusion, science is for all people regardless of belief. What creationists hate is the attempt of evolutionist-atheist to deprive creationists doing science just because of religion not knowing evolution also is a religion. Let the scientific proof speaks as long it is inside the scoop of true science
26:28 Hold the fuck on!!!!! Correlation does NOT equal causation!!!!!!!
I'm honestly not sure that you know what you're talking about. You must not understand him clearly.
@@johnellg9399no. He's literally saying you can connect to unrelated things as being connected with no evidence other than they happen near the same time
I use to think this, but it simply isn't the case.
The Roman catholic church, amongst other things, also forbids birth control, does not really prosecute priests who molest little children, and you trust their judgement?