When you look at a T Rex’a arms, they appear to be anatomically identical to birds. Modern “science” has covered this up otherwise what purpose would such tiny arms serve? They’re evolutionarily useless.
What about the one ancient tomb or temple with an almost perfect engraving of a Stegosaurus in it, hundreds of years before they should've even known what it looked like
@@ChrisMusante well, the importance of not making assumptions. When you think about science assumes a lot. We have made ourselves believe dinosaurs and people can't have lived together, that's it's impossible. So when we find evidence that breaks that idea, we automatically assume "no, there must be something we're missing, there must be some other explanation."
“Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.” Genesis 1:24-25
dogs are just tamed wolves, are they the dog kind or are they the wolf kind???, wolves are just evolved miacids are they the wolf kind or are they the miacids kind. it just goes on and on and on and on back to single celled life
@@Dennistube001 From what I understand, you struggle to understand what "kind" refers to, is that so? If that is the case, then you know what the problem is, and you could have Googled it by now. You aren't lazy - although I didn't answer for less than a day and you got agitated, idk about you, but I'm not constantly on YT. Anyways, if you are too lazy too Google, and I am indeed correct in assuming that you simply do not understand what "kind" refers to, just state it, and I shall tell you :)
@@bobbyallen7977 behemoth was an elephant and leviathan likely a crocodile, behemoth is in elephant because when god is describing behemoth he mentions to Job “let him who made him bring near his sword” obviously the Bible isn’t saying that god have this creature literal metal blades protruding from its body but a sharp body part indeed, and then “ Can one take him by his eyes, or pierce his nose with a snare” in other words they’re trying to snare his nose, these traits are unique to elephants and is no way how one would describe a dinosaur, if this was a sauropod why not described it’s enormously long neck??
@@bobbyallen7977 it’s tail is described as a cedar in terms of movement, just like a cedar moves side to side in the wind an elephant moves it’s tail from side to side, the creature is described as living and feeding in and around mountains areas, just as elephants do today, also the creature being a strong swimmer something elephants are known for
@@ramonbenitez1323 of course an elephants tail swings from side to side what other way would it ?LOL! But you have to ask yourself why was the cedar tree used as the description and not a reed swaying in the breeze.
Lies like there's no such thing as dragons, unicorns or cockatrices, humans didn't coexist with dinosaurs, or that the world is four and a half billion years old? I know, I know...next they'll be telling us that diseases are caused by germs or that there are no crystal spheres, or that Father Christmas isn't real!
@@tabularasa0606maybe they are the ones lying as they are also the ones trying to fit all the evidence to a million year old earth and dinosaur thing. Keep in mind, all cultures describe a dinosaur of some sort. Do you as a fellow human disregard all our ancestors' drawings and descriptions as what they told as REAL life to be just myth? Maybe we should study history from folks who actually lived in those times.
"The bible will always prove true in the end." the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom with shark-like teeth, that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs it is classed as a dinosaur though, but so are all birds Crocodiles. ... Sea Turtles. ... Ostriches. ... Snakes. ... Sharks. ... Crustaceans. ... Tuatara Lizards. etc but the total fact of it is the dinosaurs hes showing went extinct 66 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans, Homo sapiens, appeared.
@@sanukatharul1497 do i get an Amen for stating real facts or is it only for religious doctrine "The bible will always prove true in the end." the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs it is classed as a dinosaur though, but so are all birds Crocodiles. ... Sea Turtles. ... Ostriches. ... Snakes. ... Sharks. ... Crustaceans. ... Tuatara Lizards. etc but the total fact of it is the dinosaurs he's showing went extinct 66 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans, Homo sapiens, appeared. "Amen" for the -truth- . REAL TRUTH BACKED BY REAL EVIDENCE
Although you could consider pterodactyls to be dragons since they had wings, dragons in myths often also breathe fire and if dragons did exist then we would've found remains or fossil records of them right? I don't think that dragons existing is true at all
It really comes down to us convincing ourselves that there's no way they could've existed, no way dinosaurs and humans could've lived together, and ao any evidence we find to the contrary, we immediately think "there has to be another explanation" or "it's just an old story they told for entertainment"
I mean they didn't exist with us, and all the evidence literally says that we never did, and this dude is using descriptions thousands of years old from people that couldn't hope to understand the animals they were seeing sooooo...
@@klarag7059 Interesting. Most of the verses I see say something along the lines of "(____) will be given the strength of the horn of a unicron" or something like that. It seems clear that it's metaphorical, in fact, some use similes. But maybe there are some verses I haven't seen
@@captianbrave I believe Leviathan was another, I forget the name but the Bible description points to a dinosaur that was basically a giant Crocodile. Look it up, the internet has numerous references.
@@beestoe993 Ok. Here's the proof of why the Leviathan is T.rex. First off, what is the use of fire in water. You have to come to the surface or on land to use it. In Job 41:12, the LORD says that He will not conceal his parts or his comley proportions. This speaks of appendages which are distinct unlike paddles. Verse 22 says his neck is strong which means it can move it's head with power and probably used it's head as a battering ram. Verse 25 says when he stands up even the great warriors shit their pants. Second, Leviathan is an apex predator. He can go on land or water as he pleases like bears and tigers. He had armour round about him so that he is immune to fire. He breathed fire as those chemicals were in his head. Observe the large skull space in predatory theropod dinosaurs. Now compare it with a T.rex. The volume alone is staggering. His skin secreted some kind of oil to make him swim easily Vs 31,32. He is made without fear and God explains this to Job to show His awesome power. People usually allude Leviathan to Satan. Satan imitates. He imitated the Power of God when he tempted Jesus (Even though it was Jesus's in the first place). That is why he takes the form of a dragon because Leviathan is made without fear Verse 33 and 34. Hope this helps you, my friend 😎
You talk about dragons as if they are the fire breathing beasts we think of today. The word to describe great beasts in the Bible was translated to dragon. It meant just that, great beasts. Therefore, the word "dragon" could mean anything from a hippopotamus to a brontosaurus or anything in between.
Let me guess you mean behemoth, which can be theorised to be a hippo, because remember, they were talking about the cedar trees in the Middle East, and there happens to be some verses that say, Under the lotus plants it lies, hidden among the reeds in the marsh. The lotuses conceal it in their shadow; the poplars by the stream surround it. A raging river does not alarm it; it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth Which blatantly says this is an aquatic creature, don’t know of any dragons that are aquatic, they’re mainly flying beasts. And yes, hippo bones have been discovered in the Middle East.
Dracorex Hogwartsia. Look at the skeleton not the "artists rendition" - it is possible the wings may not have fossilized and also some dragons didn't even have wings (technically those were called "drakes" but same difference)
@@katamas832 I don’t know what you’re expecting it to look like - the head is about the right shape and so is the body. And yeah it’s a cool name - whoever named it must’ve been a big Harry Potter fan.
@@CoastinDave Like a serpent? Only more modern depictions of dragons aren't serpent like, look at ancient China's depictions for example and you see them having insanely long, bendy bodies. This dinosaur has a solid, kind of bulky upper body, the neck and tail about as stiff as you'd expect. Not fitting a dragon
@@katamas832 I see - yeah there’s different types. I think the Welsh dragon is also more snake like along the body - Dracorex Hogwartsia is like you said, more solid bodied which some ancient depictions are more in line with. I don’t know a more serpentine skeleton off the top of my head. There’s a good lot of variety though for dragons
The book of Daniel in ch. 13 or 14, Daniel slays a dragon. Only in the Catholic Bible. It's too bad alcoholic monk named Luther took hundreds of verses out of the bible. He got punished badly for it. Read about the protestant curse in Rev 22:20
@@DefendersOfWomen wow. Do you not know how corrupted the Catholic church was? It basically made Christianity "pay to win." About these "hundreds of verses" Martin Luther took out, the extra books in the Catholic bible are apart of the Apocrypha. These books were decided as heretical by the early church fathers (because they are), and we're only added to the Catholic Bible as a response to Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation. If you want corruption, look no further than the Catholic church.
and don't be dismayed because the word: "dinosaur" isn't in the KJV bible. the word wasn't invented until a couple hundred years after the KJV was translated. the word may not be there, but many of us believe they were still there.
Dragons capable of flight would've had to have hollow bones to be capable of flight this with the giant size it's believed they would not have been able tp fossilize
No, people didn't question the existance of dragons for the same reason they didn't question the existance of fairies. They didn't believe because they saw them, but because of the legends around them. If what you are saying is true, dinosaurs went extinct a few centuries ago. Now that is a tremendous burden of proof you just brought upon yourself, and good luck trying to provide any evidence for it.
Satellite map of Australia upside down.dark red ocher section in middle of continent. Giant flying winged Phoenix type of creature. Head eyes and huge beak just above Karratha western Australia with satellite map of Australia upside down.also taking out dragon corner SA, Victoria, NSW state border. Give it a blast and be extremely blessed and amazed! Good luck.👍🇦🇺🤠
There's numerous ancient serious writings ot things that were referred to as "dragons". But they made no entries in a dictionary or glossary. There really werent any reference books of that type. So you can't say its wrong. You can only dig up the evidence. A portion of the evidence stll contains tissue. So how old can it actually be? It makes newer researchers say that the evidence changes what is now known more of. A legend often is found to have a factual basis.
they taught us mythology is a myth... churches do not teach one that the world has quenched the spirit and this is why you do not see these things...mythology is a myth...not mary j
Are records of Julius Caesar and his life just stories? Or accounts of the battle of Thermopylae? Make your distinction one of historical records and clear fiction, which we can vet by historical principles of study, instead of one that only looks at the subject matter of the account and immediately calls an historical account fiction because it does not fall in-line with what you would expect or desire to see. Don't let an naturalistic, empirically blinded outlook keep you from preserving and understanding history as it actually was. Empiricism can't lead you to trustworthy knowledge of the past in any event, only trustworthy knowledge of what you personally can observe, measure, and repeat. Study history as a historian, not a chemist or biologist.
Revelation 12:3 "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads." Totally talking about a dinosaur... to a tee.
No dinosaurs never lived amongst man, the “dragons” that are described in the Bible or any other cultures hardly fit the descriptions of dinosaurs, many of them are exaggerated stories passed on from generation to generation, had dinosaurs lived amongst man there should be a large number of them buried in the same layer modern mammals are and it would be a constant find, statistically speaking many of them should also have survived to modern day given how adaptable they were, and on top of that it would’ve been common for ancient cultures to hunt or even warship them, we should constantly find examples of this like a triceratops skull or horns adorning a palace wall or stories of these legendary hunts of enormous beasts or battles of them in the colosseum or very detailed depictions of them in stone carvings
@@nostrum6410, our modern mythical dragons seem to be combinations of real dinosaur characteristics. Long necks and tails, wings, horns and spikes-these all existed, just not on one animal. It’s almost like they went extinct, and people eventually started getting the details wrong. Go figure.
@@DefendersOfWomen look up a good dictionary for the definition of myth and you’ll find it’s not always referring to things that have no foundation in reality.
dragon 1 a mythical monster resembling a giant reptile. sometimes with wings. In European tradition the dragon is typically fire-breathing and tends to symbolize chaos or evil, whereas in East Asia it is usually a beneficent symbol of fertility, associated with water and the heavens. 2 another term for flying lizard. but the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom with shark-like teeth, that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs also the vid shows a pic of the dragon. Coloured red. look at that then a real Komodo Dragon, apart from the colour there the same
@@captianbrave utter tosh a behemoth is elephant like with large tusks. a sauropod has a very very long neck and a very very long thick tail same width as its neck. they look nothing alike. a leviathan is more like a large snake with legs. nothing like t-rex
@@Dennistube001 As for Behemoth, he can take up a river in his mouth which means he has a long neck to drink up all the water in a river if he wanted. His tail is like a cedar which is very supple. He has a tail and neck to balance himself. His bones are likened to brass and iron. Have seen the bones of a sauropod? Finally, he is the chief of the creation of GOD. Which is the biggest animal on land? A dinosaur like Patagotitan mayorum. There are also bigger bones of unknown species which may suggest certain sauropods grew to 200 feet.
@@captianbrave I REPEAT. UTTER TOSH utter tosh a behemoth is elephant like with large tusks. a sauropod has a very very long neck and a very very long thick tail same width as its neck. they look nothing alike. a leviathan is more like a large snake with legs. nothing like t-rex
@@robwaters8848 What do you mean I am walking with Christ. You don’t know my relationship with the Heavenly Father and Jesus. I believe the Father of Jesus is the Father. Jesus never said no specific name. If Jesus said no one has never seen my Father, nor his form, nor heard his voice. Then who was Moses seeing and talking to in the Old Testament. Another thing in Luke 9:52-56 when Jesus went into the Samaritan village and Jesus wasn’t welcomed because he was headed to Jerusalem. The disciples James and John asked Jesus do you want us to bring fire down from Heaven to destroy them? When Jesus heard them say that he turned around and rebuked them and said son you don’t even know what spirit you are of. Jesus said that because in the Old Testament Yahweh and Elisha was bringing down fire from heaven and destroying innocent lives. Jesus is not gonna say that for no reason. I’m not twisting scripture, I’m just reading the Bible how it says it. Even the Elisha story when the 2 young boys made fun of Elisha bald head, go up you baldy. What did Elisha do? He asked Yahweh to curse them. All of the sudden 2 mother bears came out of the forest and mauled 42 children. Didn’t Jesus just say pray for those who persecute you. I actually don’t follow gnostics teachings, I know a little bit about them, but even some Christians are realizing this. Yahweh sent a lying Spirit. The Heavenly Father cannot lie. He has no darkness in him. Also the Heavenly Father doesn’t tempt people and doesn’t tempt people with evil.
@@marceld8961 About no one seeing God's face, Moses never truly saw God's "face." The verses are meant to imply that Moses had a close relationship with God. I'm not too sure about the Elisha verses, I haven't researched or read those much. And about God sending a lying spirit, 1 God himself never lied or deceived anyone by doing this and 2, God essentially utilized these lying spirits to do his plan of the death sentence for King Ahab. I'm curious, do you believe in the Trinity, and do you believe Jesus is God? And why do you think Yahweh is a beast?
Marco Polo totally describes a T-Rex. To a 'T' actually.
I see what you did there.
When you look at a T Rex’a arms, they appear to be anatomically identical to birds. Modern “science” has covered this up otherwise what purpose would such tiny arms serve? They’re evolutionarily useless.
What about the one ancient tomb or temple with an almost perfect engraving of a Stegosaurus in it, hundreds of years before they should've even known what it looked like
@@jneumy566 - indeed. The inportance of NOT telling lies, ever. Holes in truth are holes in 'time'.
@@ChrisMusante well, the importance of not making assumptions. When you think about science assumes a lot. We have made ourselves believe dinosaurs and people can't have lived together, that's it's impossible. So when we find evidence that breaks that idea, we automatically assume "no, there must be something we're missing, there must be some other explanation."
“Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.”
Genesis 1:24-25
dogs are just tamed wolves, are they the dog kind or are they the wolf kind???, wolves are just evolved miacids are they the wolf kind or are they the miacids kind. it just goes on and on and on and on back to single celled life
@@Dennistube001 What are you on about?
@@cerebrummaximus3762 the word kind, explain it. as i said "dogs are just tamed wolves, are they the dog kind or are they the wolf kind???"
@@cerebrummaximus3762 what no reply.
@@Dennistube001 From what I understand, you struggle to understand what "kind" refers to, is that so? If that is the case, then you know what the problem is, and you could have Googled it by now. You aren't lazy - although I didn't answer for less than a day and you got agitated, idk about you, but I'm not constantly on YT. Anyways, if you are too lazy too Google, and I am indeed correct in assuming that you simply do not understand what "kind" refers to, just state it, and I shall tell you :)
People: "Dragons are a myth"
Dinosaurs🦖: "Am I a joke to you!!!"
The Bible talks about Leviathan if you have a real one.
And the behemoth in Job!
@@bobbyallen7977 behemoth was an elephant and leviathan likely a crocodile, behemoth is in elephant because when god is describing behemoth he mentions to Job “let him who made him bring near his sword” obviously the Bible isn’t saying that god have this creature literal metal blades protruding from its body but a sharp body part indeed, and then “ Can one take him by his eyes, or pierce his nose with a snare” in other words they’re trying to snare his nose, these traits are unique to elephants and is no way how one would describe a dinosaur, if this was a sauropod why not described it’s enormously long neck??
@@ramonbenitez1323 it described its tail as being being like a cedar when it swings.Elephants don't have tails like that.
@@bobbyallen7977 it’s tail is described as a cedar in terms of movement, just like a cedar moves side to side in the wind an elephant moves it’s tail from side to side, the creature is described as living and feeding in and around mountains areas, just as elephants do today, also the creature being a strong swimmer something elephants are known for
@@ramonbenitez1323 of course an elephants tail swings from side to side what other way would it ?LOL! But you have to ask yourself why was the cedar tree used as the description and not a reed swaying in the breeze.
When will secular scholars stop their lies...
Lies like there's no such thing as dragons, unicorns or cockatrices, humans didn't coexist with dinosaurs, or that the world is four and a half billion years old? I know, I know...next they'll be telling us that diseases are caused by germs or that there are no crystal spheres, or that Father Christmas isn't real!
They're not the ones lying.
You mean Christian Apologists? Never
@@tabularasa0606maybe they are the ones lying as they are also the ones trying to fit all the evidence to a million year old earth and dinosaur thing. Keep in mind, all cultures describe a dinosaur of some sort. Do you as a fellow human disregard all our ancestors' drawings and descriptions as what they told as REAL life to be just myth? Maybe we should study history from folks who actually lived in those times.
Just got this book on audiobook. Can't wait to listen!
The bible will always prove true in the end.
"The bible will always prove true in the end."
the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom with shark-like teeth, that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs
it is classed as a dinosaur though, but so are all birds
Crocodiles. ...
Sea Turtles. ...
Ostriches. ...
Snakes. ...
Sharks. ...
Crustaceans. ...
Tuatara Lizards.
etc
but the total fact of it is the dinosaurs hes showing went extinct 66 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans, Homo sapiens, appeared.
Amen!
@@sanukatharul1497 do i get an Amen for stating real facts or is it only for religious doctrine
"The bible will always prove true in the end."
the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs
it is classed as a dinosaur though, but so are all birds
Crocodiles. ...
Sea Turtles. ...
Ostriches. ...
Snakes. ...
Sharks. ...
Crustaceans. ...
Tuatara Lizards.
etc
but the total fact of it is the dinosaurs he's showing went extinct 66 million years ago, in a time known as the Mesozoic Era. This was many millions of years before the first modern humans, Homo sapiens, appeared.
"Amen" for the -truth- . REAL TRUTH BACKED BY REAL EVIDENCE
Have you actually read the horrible book?
Amen
Cool short guys. 👍🏻 praying I can go there and possibly work there.
You should if you are able to.
Dinosaurs today is what dragons are back then
Dragon was changed to Dinasaur in 1850
Although you could consider pterodactyls to be dragons since they had wings, dragons in myths often also breathe fire and if dragons did exist then we would've found remains or fossil records of them right? I don't think that dragons existing is true at all
Where can i buy that book?
On their website
It really comes down to us convincing ourselves that there's no way they could've existed, no way dinosaurs and humans could've lived together, and ao any evidence we find to the contrary, we immediately think "there has to be another explanation" or "it's just an old story they told for entertainment"
I mean they didn't exist with us, and all the evidence literally says that we never did, and this dude is using descriptions thousands of years old from people that couldn't hope to understand the animals they were seeing sooooo...
Yes!
Such fascinating creatures.
Unicorns are mentioned in the Bible as well
It doesn't suggest they were real though. The verses containing unicorns are usually metaphorical, unlike the verses containing dragons.
@@m.r.reeceabob8480 there’s an episode on this channel where they show the word actually refers to a type of rhinoceros that is now extinct.
@@klarag7059 Interesting. Most of the verses I see say something along the lines of "(____) will be given the strength of the horn of a unicron" or something like that. It seems clear that it's metaphorical, in fact, some use similes. But maybe there are some verses I haven't seen
@@m.r.reeceabob8480, well the single-horned rhino was pretty strong. The metaphor only makes sense if there was a real animal being referenced.
The real question is exactly what was a "Dragon" in the Bible. Was it a giant winged reptile that could breathe fire? NO!!!!
The behemoth is a sauropod dinosaur and the leviathan is the T.rex.
@@captianbrave I believe Leviathan was another, I forget the name but the Bible description points to a dinosaur that was basically a giant Crocodile. Look it up, the internet has numerous references.
@@beestoe993 Ok. Here's the proof of why the Leviathan is T.rex. First off, what is the use of fire in water. You have to come to the surface or on land to use it. In Job 41:12, the LORD says that He will not conceal his parts or his comley proportions. This speaks of appendages which are distinct unlike paddles. Verse 22 says his neck is strong which means it can move it's head with power and probably used it's head as a battering ram. Verse 25 says when he stands up even the great warriors shit their pants.
Second, Leviathan is an apex predator. He can go on land or water as he pleases like bears and tigers. He had armour round about him so that he is immune to fire. He breathed fire as those chemicals were in his head. Observe the large skull space in predatory theropod dinosaurs. Now compare it with a T.rex. The volume alone is staggering. His skin secreted some kind of oil to make him swim easily Vs 31,32. He is made without fear and God explains this to Job to show His awesome power. People usually allude Leviathan to Satan. Satan imitates. He imitated the Power of God when he tempted Jesus (Even though it was Jesus's in the first place). That is why he takes the form of a dragon because Leviathan is made without fear Verse 33 and 34.
Hope this helps you, my friend 😎
@@captianbrave
It was a crocodile.
@@captianbravesounds like a hippo...
You talk about dragons as if they are the fire breathing beasts we think of today.
The word to describe great beasts in the Bible was translated to dragon. It meant just that, great beasts. Therefore, the word "dragon" could mean anything from a hippopotamus to a brontosaurus or anything in between.
Do you have the video of the presentation of the book?😢 i'll listen to it, don't matter how many hours it is..
This what happens when you start at the conclusion you want to be right and then work backwards to find supporting "evidence".
Dinosaurs dragons and the Bible. Sounds like a book that someone who took 5 blunts to the face wrote
Love, AIG❤
They're lying and only in it for the money.
In the 1700s the church was unwilling to accept that creatures *could go extinct in the first place*. Funny how things change.
Amen 🙂✝️🙏
Let me guess you mean behemoth, which can be theorised to be a hippo, because remember, they were talking about the cedar trees in the Middle East, and there happens to be some verses that say,
Under the lotus plants it lies,
hidden among the reeds in the marsh.
The lotuses conceal it in their shadow;
the poplars by the stream surround it.
A raging river does not alarm it;
it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth
Which blatantly says this is an aquatic creature, don’t know of any dragons that are aquatic, they’re mainly flying beasts. And yes, hippo bones have been discovered in the Middle East.
Maybe the word dragon could represent a big lizard, like a dinosaur or sum. Or even a dragon too
Please tell me the closest dinosaur that matches the description of a dragon
Dracorex Hogwartsia. Look at the skeleton not the "artists rendition" - it is possible the wings may not have fossilized and also some dragons didn't even have wings (technically those were called "drakes" but same difference)
@@CoastinDave That doesn't look like a dragon OR drake in skeleton.
I love the name though
@@katamas832 I don’t know what you’re expecting it to look like - the head is about the right shape and so is the body. And yeah it’s a cool name - whoever named it must’ve been a big Harry Potter fan.
@@CoastinDave Like a serpent? Only more modern depictions of dragons aren't serpent like, look at ancient China's depictions for example and you see them having insanely long, bendy bodies. This dinosaur has a solid, kind of bulky upper body, the neck and tail about as stiff as you'd expect. Not fitting a dragon
@@katamas832 I see - yeah there’s different types. I think the Welsh dragon is also more snake like along the body - Dracorex Hogwartsia is like you said, more solid bodied which some ancient depictions are more in line with. I don’t know a more serpentine skeleton off the top of my head. There’s a good lot of variety though for dragons
The Bible talks about all sorts of things that don't exist. dragons, Angels, demons, devil's, God's, spirits...
Ohhhhh I'm going to get this
We have fossils for dinosaurs. 🤔 Why hasnt mankind recovered one fossil of your dragons?? Because they are mythological creatures.
Did humans ever kill dragons?
St George did.
That's how we think some of the dinosaurs went extinct- they were hunted to extinction.
The book of Daniel in ch. 13 or 14, Daniel slays a dragon. Only in the Catholic Bible. It's too bad alcoholic monk named Luther took hundreds of verses out of the bible. He got punished badly for it. Read about the protestant curse in Rev 22:20
@@DefendersOfWomen wow. Do you not know how corrupted the Catholic church was? It basically made Christianity "pay to win." About these "hundreds of verses" Martin Luther took out, the extra books in the Catholic bible are apart of the Apocrypha. These books were decided as heretical by the early church fathers (because they are), and we're only added to the Catholic Bible as a response to Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation. If you want corruption, look no further than the Catholic church.
@@joshuakohlmann9731 it was actually a monitor lizard
So are you suggesting dinosaurs and modern humans existed at the same time?
Also like your shirt were did you get my guy?
and don't be dismayed because the word: "dinosaur" isn't in the KJV bible. the word wasn't invented until a couple hundred years after the KJV was translated.
the word may not be there, but many of us believe they were still there.
I would say dragons are one form of dinosaurs
Dragons were real but it’s not good to have images of mythical dragons in your house.
They still exist, you can even have them as pets. Look up bearded dragon.
Also "Myth" means history, not imaginational 0:08
History means history, legend means it has a basis in history, myth means made up
Dragons capable of flight would've had to have hollow bones to be capable of flight this with the giant size it's believed they would not have been able tp fossilize
No, people didn't question the existance of dragons for the same reason they didn't question the existance of fairies. They didn't believe because they saw them, but because of the legends around them. If what you are saying is true, dinosaurs went extinct a few centuries ago. Now that is a tremendous burden of proof you just brought upon yourself, and good luck trying to provide any evidence for it.
Satellite map of Australia upside down.dark red ocher section in middle of continent. Giant flying winged Phoenix type of creature. Head eyes and huge beak just above Karratha western Australia with satellite map of Australia upside down.also taking out dragon corner SA, Victoria, NSW state border. Give it a blast and be extremely blessed and amazed! Good luck.👍🇦🇺🤠
Hush, don't bring our country into this. Geography can help you draw a lustful woman of the Atlantic ocean
There's numerous ancient serious writings ot things that were referred to as "dragons".
But they made no entries in a dictionary or glossary.
There really werent any reference books of that type.
So you can't say its wrong.
You can only dig up the evidence.
A portion of the evidence stll contains tissue.
So how old can it actually be?
It makes newer researchers say that the evidence changes what is now known more of.
A legend often is found to have a factual basis.
Dinosaur or much smaller dragons were still seen & recorded in the 16th century AD.
Do you have evidence for this remarkable claim?
they taught us mythology is a myth...
churches do not teach one that the world has quenched the spirit and this is why you do not see these things...mythology is a myth...not
mary j
That's an awfully big book for a pretty simple topic.
Yea it is a pretty big book 📕 but I don’t think it’s too simple it simple to understand but it has a lot of interesting things. God bless you.
I don't know about that book, but a lot of them are written to extend the length/number of pages to the point it's irritating.
It talks about dragons in the Hobbit too, that doesn't mean that it is real. It's just stories.
Are records of Julius Caesar and his life just stories? Or accounts of the battle of Thermopylae? Make your distinction one of historical records and clear fiction, which we can vet by historical principles of study, instead of one that only looks at the subject matter of the account and immediately calls an historical account fiction because it does not fall in-line with what you would expect or desire to see. Don't let an naturalistic, empirically blinded outlook keep you from preserving and understanding history as it actually was. Empiricism can't lead you to trustworthy knowledge of the past in any event, only trustworthy knowledge of what you personally can observe, measure, and repeat. Study history as a historian, not a chemist or biologist.
I think, 1841 it was coined
Dragons = dinosaurs....yeah real.
Makes sense
Reasonable assumption
Revelation 12:3 "And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads."
Totally talking about a dinosaur... to a tee.
Slovenia land of dragons
❤🙏
This is nothing short of unhinged
Turn to CHRIST, the serpent is playing you and he even got you to worship him by wearing an idol or image of him.
The dragon is satan.
No Dinosaur perfectly matches the description of either of the two most common depictions of dragons even a little
This is embarrassing 🙈
Are vampires and ghouls real too?
Oh so the bible isn't accurate and had no super human knowledge..
No dinosaurs never lived amongst man, the “dragons” that are described in the Bible or any other cultures hardly fit the descriptions of dinosaurs, many of them are exaggerated stories passed on from generation to generation, had dinosaurs lived amongst man there should be a large number of them buried in the same layer modern mammals are and it would be a constant find, statistically speaking many of them should also have survived to modern day given how adaptable they were, and on top of that it would’ve been common for ancient cultures to hunt or even warship them, we should constantly find examples of this like a triceratops skull or horns adorning a palace wall or stories of these legendary hunts of enormous beasts or battles of them in the colosseum or very detailed depictions of them in stone carvings
@it's the end of the world and the evidence weak
dragons are still a myth
The word dinosaur was invented in 1841. Before that they called them dragons. Dinosaurs are not myths!
@@DefendersOfWomen virtually every fact about dragons is a myth, is that better?
@@nostrum6410, our modern mythical dragons seem to be combinations of real dinosaur characteristics. Long necks and tails, wings, horns and spikes-these all existed, just not on one animal.
It’s almost like they went extinct, and people eventually started getting the details wrong. Go figure.
@@DefendersOfWomen look up a good dictionary for the definition of myth and you’ll find it’s not always referring to things that have no foundation in reality.
@@klarag7059 look up dragon under an old dictionary from the 1600's & it will say; "A very rare but still living animal."
dragon
1 a mythical monster resembling a giant reptile. sometimes with wings. In European tradition the dragon is typically fire-breathing and tends to symbolize chaos or evil, whereas in East Asia it is usually a beneficent symbol of fertility, associated with water and the heavens.
2 another term for flying lizard.
but the truth is it was just a large lizard, the Komodo Dragon is still around today. about 5 foot long, but its mouth is so packed with oozing bacteria and venom with shark-like teeth, that its that that kills. it just bites its prey and waits., a human would die in about 2 hrs
also the vid shows a pic of the dragon. Coloured red. look at that then a real Komodo Dragon, apart from the colour there the same
The behemoth is a sauropod dinosaur and the leviathan is the T.rex.
@@captianbrave utter tosh a behemoth is elephant like with large tusks. a sauropod has a very very long neck and a very very long thick tail same width as its neck. they look nothing alike.
a leviathan is more like a large snake with legs. nothing like t-rex
@@Dennistube001 As for Behemoth, he can take up a river in his mouth which means he has a long neck to drink up all the water in a river if he wanted. His tail is like a cedar which is very supple. He has a tail and neck to balance himself. His bones are likened to brass and iron. Have seen the bones of a sauropod? Finally, he is the chief of the creation of GOD. Which is the biggest animal on land? A dinosaur like Patagotitan mayorum. There are also bigger bones of unknown species which may suggest certain sauropods grew to 200 feet.
There you have it. The biggest and the fiercest creations of God. If you have any questions, I would love to answer them.
@@captianbrave I REPEAT. UTTER TOSH
utter tosh a behemoth is elephant like with large tusks. a sauropod has a very very long neck and a very very long thick tail same width as its neck. they look nothing alike.
a leviathan is more like a large snake with legs. nothing like t-rex
Yahweh himself is a dragon. Yahweh is either satan or the beast. Yahweh is not Jesus Father, they are not the same person.
Marcel D,
Blasphemy!
@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 How? Jesus Father have no darkness in him and can’t kill. How is me saying that is blasphemous.
You're gonna need all the luck in the world to walk that path and come out the other side with merit... Christ be with you 🙏
@@robwaters8848 What do you mean I am walking with Christ. You don’t know my relationship with the Heavenly Father and Jesus.
I believe the Father of Jesus is the Father. Jesus never said no specific name. If Jesus said no one has never seen my Father, nor his form, nor heard his voice. Then who was Moses seeing and talking to in the Old Testament. Another thing in Luke 9:52-56 when Jesus went into the Samaritan village and Jesus wasn’t welcomed because he was headed to Jerusalem. The disciples James and John asked Jesus do you want us to bring fire down from Heaven to destroy them? When Jesus heard them say that he turned around and rebuked them and said son you don’t even know what spirit you are of. Jesus said that because in the Old Testament Yahweh and Elisha was bringing down fire from heaven and destroying innocent lives. Jesus is not gonna say that for no reason. I’m not twisting scripture, I’m just reading the Bible how it says it. Even the Elisha story when the 2 young boys made fun of Elisha bald head, go up you baldy. What did Elisha do? He asked Yahweh to curse them. All of the sudden 2 mother bears came out of the forest and mauled 42 children. Didn’t Jesus just say pray for those who persecute you. I actually don’t follow gnostics teachings, I know a little bit about them, but even some Christians are realizing this. Yahweh sent a lying Spirit. The Heavenly Father cannot lie. He has no darkness in him. Also the Heavenly Father doesn’t tempt people and doesn’t tempt people with evil.
@@marceld8961 About no one seeing God's face, Moses never truly saw God's "face." The verses are meant to imply that Moses had a close relationship with God. I'm not too sure about the Elisha verses, I haven't researched or read those much. And about God sending a lying spirit, 1 God himself never lied or deceived anyone by doing this and 2, God essentially utilized these lying spirits to do his plan of the death sentence for King Ahab.
I'm curious, do you believe in the Trinity, and do you believe Jesus is God? And why do you think Yahweh is a beast?
HUGE stretch to equate a Behemoth with a fire-breathing-flying-monster.
What's next, mermaids & minotaurs are real too? 🫤
Maybe the word dragon could represent a big lizard, like a dinosaur or sum. Or even a dragon too