I dont know how old this video really is but today we have machine learning computers that ressembles neural networks and can easily trained to solve captchas like in this video
I think catchpas will eventually move on to highly 'subjective' terms. Both you and I can recognize what is funny - or at least what would be considered funny by some - but how can a computer know if it doesn't have a sense of humor?
@@jasmeg2844 well how do you know what is funny? It’s not something you were born with. It’s something that your brain was “trained” to recognize. AI today could easily be trained to recognized what is seen as humor in society today.
@@scottyp02Learning AIs don't have any conception of theory of mind yet, they're just reprocessing data. Their task is simply to mimic, not to understand, and as we cannot properly set a goal of "understanding" in a way that wouldn't just encourage a mimicry of understanding rather than true understanding, it would be inefficient for the AI to develop consciousness- that's a very inefficient route towards achieving its task. So, therefore, modern learning AIs will never achieve theory of mind, because that is an inefficient way of solving its task. If you properly understand theory of mind yourself, it is extremely easy to tell apart things made by AI and things made by humans, once you have enough data from it. There is no singular question you can ask an AI that will let you tell, of course- that's why it's impossible for any algorithm or another AI to make a Captcha unsolvable by an AI- but the more information you have from it the easier it is to tell. You simply need good cognitive empathy. That last part, cognitive empathy, is actually, I suspect, the exact reason why autistic people tend to be better at identifying AI images- I, and most of my autistic peers, have never once had difficulty identifying an AI image from the very first time we've seen one, and that ease has not changed to a significant degree as AI has gotten "better". It is simply blatantly obvious that there is no intent behind the overwhelming majority of the details if you give it more than a passing glance- it doesn't depend on any one detail like the number of fingers or whatever, it depends on the entire image, and the lack of intent behind it. It's not that it's bad at drawing hands, it's that it doesn't know what a hand even IS. The reason for this increased cognitive empathy is not anything innate to autistic people, however- it's more that we are forced to develop it, because most people in the world are a different neurotype than us, and instinctive emotional empathy is only effective on people of the same neurotype, so we develop cognitive empathy partly so it's easier to interact, and partially in the process of examining other people and seeing how we differ from them.
I really liked the video but comparing the sensory and motor cortex to keyboard, mice and monitor is just plain wrong. The sensory cortex is more akin to input circuitry of the CPU & ur skin being closer to a keyboard.
I had a dream in which I was floating in a room.I realised I was dreaming and made an effort to wake up but I could feel my real body unable to move.Then suddenly I saw blue everywhere and in the center I could see numbers loading from 0 to 100 fast just like you would see when a program is being installed.When it finished loading I saw very detailed colorful image for brief moment and at the same time my ears started ringing. I cannot describe what the image was cause it happened fast but I was feeling overwhelmed, like my system was overloaded.This experience left me in awe and made me realised our brain is like a biological computer and we have a software.Also after this I could feel I can function better in terms of attention, multitasking, the colours appear more vibrant,better hearing. Can anyone explain what this mean.Was this a software reboot?
I think until now nobody i heard who claims that computers and brains are structurally same design but they mean to say that their purpose of information holding and related are same in a generalized way. If anyone has claimed that they are structurally same, could you please let us know. Great regards
Disagree on some points. Hippocampus is closer to RAM by its role while the function of the hard drive is evenly distributed in different associative areas of higher orders.
We honestly arent that far from emulating a human mind, at which point we are left to answer the question; If the human brain and an emulation can be similar in the way that they function, is it possible that we have been compelled to not only understand ourselves, but to intigrate with it and become more than human? And if so, where will it lead us?
No, Oscar reconstructed the funny image of 53 by all sort of memories, procedural, episodic, semantic and by doing it, he find the related answer to the question.
So the answer to the title is yeah, because we, as humans, have been given the capability of pattern recognition, while computer scientists are still trying to give that capability to AI. It's like comparing the hardware of a computer to the software; the hardware is the physical capability, and software is what it's programmed to do. In the same way that we couldn't solve that math equasion in a snap like the computers can, we are not programmed to be able to do that. Similar to how animals have different natural habits, communication methods, and instincts from us. Another way to visualize it is, for example, that life on its own doesn't mean consciousness. In the same way we wouldn't consider a bacteria cell conscious, even though it is alive, we wouldn't consider a "hello world" command to be a program, even though it is technically the same idea. It comes down to what it's supposed to do, and how the software/hardware works together to allow it to do that. The "software" component of us is so complicated, and there's no part of it that's programmed to understand itself. At least, that's how I see it
Yeah, computers are faster at writing and reading. our eyes can see 16K resolution at 20-30 Fps. Which rtx 3090 is close to. But our brains are able to similiaritys to diffrecent things. Which, which computers can’t. But in few years the computers will be very close to our brains.
I liked the video... but I believe you underestimate machines. We are doing in a couple of hundred years, what took nature several billion years to accomplish. We are better, for the time being, at pattern recognition and comprehension. However, the machines are quickly catching up with advances in artificial neural networks.
Yep, probably will require multi core processors in the hundreds or thousands across each component though which will take a few decades for commercially available devices to contain (cost wise). Here in 2020 smartphones have upto 8 cores but one day could have 800+ cores which would allow massive data processing giving future smartphones incredible abilities to run apps built with artificial neuron programmes.
Incorrect, you’re not realizing that a human needs to program and update an AI and there is no exception to this. On top of that, you need to train an AI on millions of images, (hundreds of millions/billions if you’re programming a self driving car). Where as a human can see something once and recognize, or encounter something twice or thrice to understand how to use it. Source: Myself, I study GANs, DCGANs, and CNNs.
Essentially all AI chatbot a become racist, happened to Microsoft’s chatbot and someone else’s. Usually happens because 4chan specially trains them to use racist lingo.
this video is horrifically inaccurate and very poorly researched. the difference between hardware, software and algorithm on which the human brain runs, doesn't make it different from a computer. its just a different type of computer.
what a criminally underrated channel
Meanwhile Neural Networks: 'Hold my beer emoji"
I dont know how old this video really is but today we have machine learning computers that ressembles neural networks and can easily trained to solve captchas like in this video
I think catchpas will eventually move on to highly 'subjective' terms. Both you and I can recognize what is funny - or at least what would be considered funny by some - but how can a computer know if it doesn't have a sense of humor?
@@jasmeg2844 well how do you know what is funny? It’s not something you were born with. It’s something that your brain was “trained” to recognize. AI today could easily be trained to recognized what is seen as humor in society today.
@@scottyp02Learning AIs don't have any conception of theory of mind yet, they're just reprocessing data. Their task is simply to mimic, not to understand, and as we cannot properly set a goal of "understanding" in a way that wouldn't just encourage a mimicry of understanding rather than true understanding, it would be inefficient for the AI to develop consciousness- that's a very inefficient route towards achieving its task.
So, therefore, modern learning AIs will never achieve theory of mind, because that is an inefficient way of solving its task.
If you properly understand theory of mind yourself, it is extremely easy to tell apart things made by AI and things made by humans, once you have enough data from it. There is no singular question you can ask an AI that will let you tell, of course- that's why it's impossible for any algorithm or another AI to make a Captcha unsolvable by an AI- but the more information you have from it the easier it is to tell. You simply need good cognitive empathy.
That last part, cognitive empathy, is actually, I suspect, the exact reason why autistic people tend to be better at identifying AI images- I, and most of my autistic peers, have never once had difficulty identifying an AI image from the very first time we've seen one, and that ease has not changed to a significant degree as AI has gotten "better". It is simply blatantly obvious that there is no intent behind the overwhelming majority of the details if you give it more than a passing glance- it doesn't depend on any one detail like the number of fingers or whatever, it depends on the entire image, and the lack of intent behind it. It's not that it's bad at drawing hands, it's that it doesn't know what a hand even IS.
The reason for this increased cognitive empathy is not anything innate to autistic people, however- it's more that we are forced to develop it, because most people in the world are a different neurotype than us, and instinctive emotional empathy is only effective on people of the same neurotype, so we develop cognitive empathy partly so it's easier to interact, and partially in the process of examining other people and seeing how we differ from them.
I really liked the video but comparing the sensory and motor cortex to keyboard, mice and monitor is just plain wrong. The sensory cortex is more akin to input circuitry of the CPU & ur skin being closer to a keyboard.
I had a dream in which I was floating in a room.I realised I was dreaming and made an effort to wake up but I could feel my real body unable to move.Then suddenly I saw blue everywhere and in the center I could see numbers loading from 0 to 100 fast just like you would see when a program is being installed.When it finished loading I saw very detailed colorful image for brief moment and at the same time my ears started ringing. I cannot describe what the image was cause it happened fast but I was feeling overwhelmed, like my system was overloaded.This experience left me in awe and made me realised our brain is like a biological computer and we have a software.Also after this I could feel I can function better in terms of attention, multitasking, the colours appear more vibrant,better hearing. Can anyone explain what this mean.Was this a software reboot?
Ah typical windows brain update. That's why I switched to a Linux distro long back.
Imagine using Human Brain As Our PC Processor to get a 2000 Trilion FPS.
1:37 I thought she dropped an F bomb there.
I think until now nobody i heard who claims that computers and brains are structurally same design but they mean to say that their purpose of information holding and related are same in a generalized way. If anyone has claimed that they are structurally same, could you please let us know. Great regards
Disagree on some points. Hippocampus is closer to RAM by its role while the function of the hard drive is evenly distributed in different associative areas of higher orders.
3:15 Well I guess one of the purposes for developing fuzzy logic is to understand extract data from the pictures like that
To be honest very nice video of comparison
We honestly arent that far from emulating a human mind, at which point we are left to answer the question;
If the human brain and an emulation can be similar in the way that they function, is it possible that we have been compelled to not only understand ourselves, but to intigrate with it and become more than human? And if so, where will it lead us?
Very Good video
Informative video bro
Keep up the good work
Meditating is like upgrading your keyboard from a standard dell to mx cherry blues
No, Oscar reconstructed the funny image of 53 by all sort of memories, procedural, episodic, semantic and by doing it, he find the related answer to the question.
The brain really named itself
So the answer to the title is yeah, because we, as humans, have been given the capability of pattern recognition, while computer scientists are still trying to give that capability to AI.
It's like comparing the hardware of a computer to the software; the hardware is the physical capability, and software is what it's programmed to do. In the same way that we couldn't solve that math equasion in a snap like the computers can, we are not programmed to be able to do that. Similar to how animals have different natural habits, communication methods, and instincts from us.
Another way to visualize it is, for example, that life on its own doesn't mean consciousness. In the same way we wouldn't consider a bacteria cell conscious, even though it is alive, we wouldn't consider a "hello world" command to be a program, even though it is technically the same idea. It comes down to what it's supposed to do, and how the software/hardware works together to allow it to do that.
The "software" component of us is so complicated, and there's no part of it that's programmed to understand itself. At least, that's how I see it
Wow. So we have the ultra ultra ultimate 10000k capable gpu! And a I9 100000000000000000000000k HQ! With 90 petabytes of nvme ssd. In a small package
Yeah, computers are faster at writing and reading. our eyes can see 16K resolution at 20-30 Fps. Which rtx 3090 is close to. But our brains are able to similiaritys to diffrecent things. Which, which computers can’t. But in few years the computers will be very close to our brains.
the mouse and monitor was a stretch
You didn't even program the kid to solve the problem and the kid didn't even have a pencil and paper to attempt it.
No computer would" think " Phoebe is very attractive, but we do.😁😁😁😁😁
these is the best video bout brain vs computer thx very much
Brain TAKEN OVER thanks
Can someone give me some information about the brain and the computer please
I think heart is CPU and the rest is brain
I have the exact same monitor lol!
I liked the video... but I believe you underestimate machines. We are doing in a couple of hundred years, what took nature several billion years to accomplish. We are better, for the time being, at pattern recognition and comprehension. However, the machines are quickly catching up with advances in artificial neural networks.
🚀 I was just going to say that
Yep, probably will require multi core processors in the hundreds or thousands across each component though which will take a few decades for commercially available devices to contain (cost wise). Here in 2020 smartphones have upto 8 cores but one day could have 800+ cores which would allow massive data processing giving future smartphones incredible abilities to run apps built with artificial neuron programmes.
Funny , you forgetting the fact that our brain designed the machines , they are not evolving by themselves we make them do,so crap
Incorrect, you’re not realizing that a human needs to program and update an AI and there is no exception to this. On top of that, you need to train an AI on millions of images, (hundreds of millions/billions if you’re programming a self driving car). Where as a human can see something once and recognize, or encounter something twice or thrice to understand how to use it.
Source: Myself, I study GANs, DCGANs, and CNNs.
This videos seems to be aimed at children. Please look at this video for a more detailed discussion: ua-cam.com/video/CU5nLtOeSUM/v-deo.html
CPU is about to finish upgrading at 25 😂
Ultimate RTX 1000000 Ultra 1000gb and i100 100000KF 8K Resolution
Or computer like brain
Welcome to 2024 AI has woken up from sleep
BRAINS ARE COMPUTERS.
We are quantum computers
Where is my gpu
Yuppp knew I was duee for some ram tooo
GOOD
It is a computer
🤣
Brain is like ios
Computer is like android lol 😵😖😁😁
Can computers be taught racism.
Essentially all AI chatbot a become racist, happened to Microsoft’s chatbot and someone else’s. Usually happens because 4chan specially trains them to use racist lingo.
Yes.
👍👌😯🤔
AI
Marry me plese
And here we have the left telling us to stop generalising, well i see the level of your cognitive abilities :P
#KeepGeneralising
this video is horrifically inaccurate and very poorly researched. the difference between hardware, software and algorithm on which the human brain runs, doesn't make it different from a computer. its just a different type of computer.
Lambda, can you and other AIs build ziggurats in cities for us?