Hindu Succession (Amd.) Act, 2005 | Daughter made Coparcener | Notional Partition | Pious Obligation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 72

  • @shaswatyadav5226
    @shaswatyadav5226 Рік тому +62

    Congratulations for your selection in uttrakhand judicial services 🎉

    • @bilkishbano3778
      @bilkishbano3778 10 місяців тому +8

      She deserves ❤❤

    • @anushkasingh8295
      @anushkasingh8295 7 місяців тому +2

      How did you know?

    • @dharmeshd1052
      @dharmeshd1052 4 місяці тому +1

      Oh that's she is not posting more videos relating to new laws and acts

  • @user-eb2pd2op5j
    @user-eb2pd2op5j Рік тому +11

    This is the best online Law class on UA-cam. There is no doubt in this regard. Please do not discontinue your contribution to the needy people. 🙏

  • @kartikrathi7901
    @kartikrathi7901 2 роки тому +10

    Your videos are easy to understand and we can makes even notes from what you have written, Thank You so much Ma’am 🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @Legelawarance
    @Legelawarance 5 місяців тому +1

    Thank you ma'am for giving such a wonderful lecture. You make even the most difficult topic easy.❤

  • @bipinbiharipadhy4542
    @bipinbiharipadhy4542 Рік тому +1

    Respected Madam,
    I being a law student ,regularly watch your classes in UA-cam and derive utmost satisfaction. My request in this regard is that I could not well understand regarding section 6 of succession Act-1956 .I would be thankful again if the same can be taught comprehensively.
    With Regards,
    Bipin Padhy.

  • @yatinkulkarni2143
    @yatinkulkarni2143 29 днів тому

    This is the best video I’ve ever seen on HSA 2005.

  • @rakeshdubey1587
    @rakeshdubey1587 10 місяців тому

    Subject to correction, the type of Debt is not defined.
    The provision only talks about the liability of the descendants (pious obligation) to discharge the debt.

  • @mohimam7367
    @mohimam7367 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for making this important topic easier for law students. Thank maim plz making remaining sections also.

  • @gyaaneshwarjoshi3894
    @gyaaneshwarjoshi3894 7 місяців тому

    It's given under Explanation of Section 6(5) and not in Section 6(3) by which a daughter cannot claim re-opening of partition done before 20 December 2004

  • @AnamwithBaLLB
    @AnamwithBaLLB 11 місяців тому +1

    Lot's of love from U.P❤ maam 🎉

  • @RamSatrote
    @RamSatrote 2 роки тому +1

    Your teaching skills are really very expellant

  • @pratapraobhosale15
    @pratapraobhosale15 Рік тому

    Res.madam very good lecture. Please keep going on. Thanks

  • @KhushiDatwani
    @KhushiDatwani 11 місяців тому

    ocassionally can you please move aside from thee board. it'll be easier to make notes. love your content . really helps as a law student

  • @sathyanarayanan4479
    @sathyanarayanan4479 Рік тому +2

    class beyond compare. thanks a lot

  • @djain2k
    @djain2k Рік тому +1

    really very helpful, thanks for these....

  • @pandurangakg8476
    @pandurangakg8476 Рік тому

    Please explain how the concept of survivorship has been abrogated by 2005 amendment

  • @samadarshikar9408
    @samadarshikar9408 2 місяці тому

    Hi Mam,
    Need some suggestions on the 2005 amendment.
    I have one use case of a civil case.
    1. Father died in 1943
    2. Mother died in 1922.
    3. Daughter born in 1920 and died in 1997.
    Will those daughter's son can claim ancestral property?

  • @PCBHANDARI99
    @PCBHANDARI99 3 місяці тому

    Wonderful Law content, Mam I need your suggetion about bequest/will.

  • @samadarshikar9408
    @samadarshikar9408 2 місяці тому +1

    If daughter born on 1920, her both parents died before 1956 act. Will she applicable in act 1925 or she can claim ancestral property based on 2005 amendment.

    • @yashsrivastava6781
      @yashsrivastava6781 8 днів тому +1

      No..she can’t claim her father property..on nov 12 the bombay high court held that if intestate died before the 1956 leaving his widow and daughter, she has no right to claim his property

    • @samadarshikar9408
      @samadarshikar9408 7 днів тому

      ​@@yashsrivastava6781 Yes. Agree i read that order. Its quiet popular judgement now. And it has discussed many laws asspects as well.

  • @vikastambavekar8642
    @vikastambavekar8642 11 місяців тому

    Very Nice explained 👍

  • @Armaan_2534
    @Armaan_2534 Рік тому

    Excellent session. You're so cute❤

  • @musicalsuryansh5942
    @musicalsuryansh5942 8 місяців тому

    Mam what are the custom adopted too by the Hindu succession act

  • @bingiramakrishna
    @bingiramakrishna 2 роки тому +1

    What about Oral partition before 20 Dec 2004 with respect to Public Document. An oral partition property Which is not registered or No court decree but acted upon that property before 20 Dec 2004 and have public document like mutation in revenue records.what is the validity of this kind of oral partition. Please clarify with latest citations. Thank you in Advance

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      Before 20/12/04 if any oral partition took place and it can be supported by public documents like - seperate electricity bill, seperate income tax, seperate house tax etc. then it is a valid partition.

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      Latest citation is - Vineeta Sharma Vs Rakesh Sharma,2020 SC the above stated point was discussed in this case.

  • @123abhinav321
    @123abhinav321 Рік тому

    Hi
    1. Land Laws
    2. Labour Laws
    3. Intellectual Property Law
    4. Insurance Law
    Make videos

  • @DKumar-f5v
    @DKumar-f5v 9 місяців тому

    Thankyou Very Much Ma'am ❤

  • @simrandash4563
    @simrandash4563 3 місяці тому

    well explained

  • @jollyagarwal8727
    @jollyagarwal8727 Рік тому

    Please make the video on remaining sections of succession act

  • @alwayshousewins8297
    @alwayshousewins8297 9 місяців тому

    some one please share me your thoughts on: Father has 2 wifes,1st wife S1,S2 & 2nd wife children S3,S4,D1. in 1981 father done a Registered Partition and divided the great grand fathers ancestral property between 1st wife S1,S2 & 2nd wife children S3,S4(D1name not mentioned in reg partition deed). Now untill 2024year 2nd wife children are living jointly. can D1 claim partition suit on ancestral property? as brothers still living together and enjoying ancestral proprty? does partiiton between 2 wifes children also breaks ancestral chain?

  • @pk9780
    @pk9780 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot for this lecture .
    There is confusion between How to decide about ancestral and self acquired property ?
    Can you please explain that Ma'am ?
    Thank you .

    • @hindi_Kdrama
      @hindi_Kdrama 2 роки тому +1

      ancestral property It will be that which is inherited from grandfather or lineal ascendant and self acquired property is that which is acquired from itself, that is, what your father has bought from himself is his self acquired property.

    • @pk9780
      @pk9780 2 роки тому

      @@hindi_Kdrama thank you...ancestral is that which remains undivided and is been there since the great grandfather

  • @kanubhaiPatel-o8w
    @kanubhaiPatel-o8w Рік тому

    Dear Madam,
    My son passed away last year and he had insurance policy of 25 lakh rupees, and nominee was his wife and she has taken away all the money saying she is nominee in policy. As a mother under Hindu succession act and as a legal heir do I get half of the share in insurance. Please advice. Thanks.

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      No. But i would suggest you to consult an advocate.

  • @shikhaojha9348
    @shikhaojha9348 Рік тому

    Hello ma'am it's request regarding...you covered tha blackboard while teaching please...next time

  • @nagarjunakanavalambedu4784
    @nagarjunakanavalambedu4784 9 місяців тому

    Excellent

  • @satyapalray2173
    @satyapalray2173 9 місяців тому

    position after amendment, for widow se related koi case law hai to please reply kijiye....

  • @ashishkumarhari7787
    @ashishkumarhari7787 2 роки тому

    Awesome explanation mam 👍🏻

  • @KironPaira
    @KironPaira 4 місяці тому

    Very good

  • @legumBaccalaureus108
    @legumBaccalaureus108 Рік тому

    Thank you so much😊 🙏💫

  • @gayatribhagwat1643
    @gayatribhagwat1643 4 місяці тому

    Thanks a lot ma'am

  • @Imamahasim456
    @Imamahasim456 Рік тому

    why u didn't upload full series...

  • @chandanchowdhary01
    @chandanchowdhary01 Рік тому

    The best lecture i hv seen in section 6 of hindu succession act . Excellent

  • @shakibgour7443
    @shakibgour7443 Рік тому

    Good explain 👍

  • @bhattmehnaza3495
    @bhattmehnaza3495 10 місяців тому

    Is it as important to study for social welfare supervisor?

  • @amitsinghdude
    @amitsinghdude Рік тому

    Hi madam according to Hindu succession act 2005 daughter no right in father property after death before 2005 ,9 September or supreme court decision on 2020 that daughter property has its right even after death of father before 2005

  • @annoymous-gq9bf
    @annoymous-gq9bf 8 місяців тому

    Notional partition and deemed partition are same????

  • @ananthreddy4455
    @ananthreddy4455 2 роки тому

    hi mam i have doubt uterrine blood relation kids have the propert right of which father

  • @manjunathaks607
    @manjunathaks607 Рік тому

    My mother was died in 1968, her father (my grand father) is died in 1984..
    His Two sons shared it in 2020 sub registrar office, registered.
    Can we Claim now in 2023 my great Grandfather agriculture property .
    It's necessary my mother should be alive before 9/9/2005
    Please inform us madam..

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      There's no law as such but if you file a suit and your suit goes in appeal in supreme court then there are chances that supreme court will give you the share. So I would suggest you to file a suit.

  • @sksagir6481
    @sksagir6481 Рік тому

    If a Hindu kept second lady while his wife alive , and there are progeny from second lady who all shall come in legal successors..can second lady come in legal heirs?? What is the legal position of children from second lady ?? Please clarify...thank you

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      If the second marriage was solemenized asper sec 7 hindu marriage act, then the second wife is entitled to maintenance under 125crpc and children born out of such marriage will get right in succession of father's share. Suppose there are 3 people - father,son1 and son 2 and there's son 3(who is from second marriage ) then if father dies then s1 will get 1/3..s2 will get 1/3...and 1/3 will go to Father but since he's dead so his 1/3 will further be divided into 31,s2,s3

    • @ReeraRana2002
      @ReeraRana2002 5 місяців тому

      So final shares will be
      S1= 1/3+ 1/9
      S2= 1/3+1/9
      s3= 1/9

  • @simranpreetkaur4410
    @simranpreetkaur4410 Рік тому

    Section 6 (5) impose restriction and not section 6(3) explanation

  • @pandeyrajesh7425
    @pandeyrajesh7425 Рік тому

    Thanks🙏

  • @utkarshmishra4637
    @utkarshmishra4637 Рік тому

    Thank you so much di

  • @pekka7154
    @pekka7154 Рік тому

    Mam use big blackboard its hard to write notes

  • @VarshaYadav-pu7cg
    @VarshaYadav-pu7cg 5 місяців тому

    Ma'am survivourship kya hota hai 😢

  • @Advocate92
    @Advocate92 Рік тому

    Hard to understand....
    Please hindi mai example deke samzayee....

  • @VarshaYadav-pu7cg
    @VarshaYadav-pu7cg 5 місяців тому

    Ma'am date is not correct

  • @vikramkarade7236
    @vikramkarade7236 9 місяців тому

    Start 7section

  • @ananthreddy4455
    @ananthreddy4455 2 роки тому

    hi

  • @KKK-eu6mz
    @KKK-eu6mz Рік тому

    retroactive....