Graham is an absolute legend Cannot believe this happened This is the pinnacle of my time creating content, thank you to everyone who has been here supporting me and welcome to any newcomers. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.
Hey, thanks for getting greame on, great to see him not having to be defensive. The fact he needs no notes infront of him says a lot. Brilliant interview and thanks for your work debunking dribble. Honestly love Mr Hancock and his devotion to finding out truths. To have hate for being guilty of only that is incredibly showing. Thankyou both.
@@vespasian266 Doxing is disclosing personal information to the public, Has Dan done this like giving out personal home addresses or phone numbers in any video?
Work is done, dinner is served, gingerbread loaf is in the oven and my bowl is currently packed. Thank you for the perfect ending to a long yet lovely day 💯
Ive always (several decades) looked at what GH does as investigative anthropology and comparitive mythology. Hes essentially a historian. One of the best.
Graham Hancock, the vindicated, brought me to your channel. May he vindicate you in the presence of the council, which is in Heliopolis, on that night of the evening meal, on that night of battle, and on that day of destroying the enemies of the lord of all.
Gave a huge thumbs up to the series on Netflix as soon as it was available. I unsubscribed from Netflix as soon as I had finished watching the series. I hope they got the message that we want more of this.
lol I did the same thing with Cobra Kai. Paid one month, watched the series, then immediately cancelled and told them because of their support of the great Con-artist Obama I'll never give them any more money than that.
@@francischambless5919 I have not removed a single comment from anyone. I think something is wrong with UA-cam's commenting, my own comments are also disappearing
I'm watching because Graham said to. As I am watching just have to mention that interviewer and the subject should be sitting in same chairs. It's a small thing in person, but on camera it's a big deal. That said I think Mr. Hancock has done a huge service to human history and I am grateful to know of him and his work.
I'm one of those people that think archeology and history has been sketchy for a long time. We follow it when we grow up, obey that it's the law and if we start asking questions, doubting it by looking for answers from "other" sources, then we have a problem. "If only you knew how bad things really are"
It is tiring enough when Graham Hancock constantly plays victim based despite earning more money and having bigger than any genuine archaeologist on Earth. If archaeologists ignore him then he is the victim because they don't take his ideas seriously. If they look at his ideas and explain why they think he is wrong, then he accuses them of persecuting him. Now you are trying to claim the same thing? Who makes you "obey" what we know about history and archaeology as "law"? What "problem" do you have if you believe in Atlantis? There isn't a global conspiracy against Graham, just a lot of people with much greater knowledge who think he is wrong.
@@Vingul - Sorry if I was unclear. I wrote, "Who makes you "obey" what we know about history and archaeology as "law"?" As that is so general, I thought it was clear in context that I then used Atlantis as an example.
@@AnyoneCanSee There are immense social pressures regarding certain topics that some of us believe are incorrect, and you can become a social pariah and, in some Western countries, even be thrown in jail merely for questioning the "accepted" narrative. Even if the narrative was correct, I find that pretty concerning.
This is an excellent podcast, it flowed very naturally and gave fresh insights. I learned more about the significance of the number 72, which is something that I've been pondering. Hearing the navel of the world is 72 degrees off eygpt is fascinating. As a strong believer in the world navigating abilities of our ancestors, I'm impressed to realize they almost certainly had a system similar to our coordinate system.
This word is ruined by Reddit but this is pretty epic, man. Good for you. Been checking in on your content on and off since you were on Good Ol Boyz a year or two back and it's cool that you're seeing success.
Point 3. Speaking with some archaeologist friends, I made them raise their eyebrows with a "hmm". I was going through videos of the old Egyptian Museum, and bumped into 3 statues standing next to each other, of Sesostris lll. As the camera panned by, it hit me. I searched the internet for pics of him and found a profile of his head, and it matched perfectly with the Sphinx profile I have. I discussed this with a few people, and they all agreed, that Sesostris was an egomaniac, along the lines of Rameses, making statues of himself everywhere, stamping his name on everything, and that recarving the Sphinx would not be beyond him. I have a profile comparison pic to send, if you wish.
Awesome, looking forward to this one. Quick question though; would it be possible to get the audio of this on Spotify? - I really enjoy listening to podcasts when going on hikes.
I microdose 🍄 quite often, and it really feels like its incredibly beneficial for my brain I kind of suspect we've evolved alongside these, it feels like a vitamin for my brain, my memory recall is much better, my precision when doing anything that requires depth perception is waaaaay better It also really makes me appreciate other people more, i can feel my emotions more, i actually want to socialize and listen to others, it just makes sense that our ancestors would want all these benefits I really believe they probably Microdosed too, if only for hunting trips or breeding or whatever, also with macro doses for shamanic/healing purposes
@Illegitimate_Scholar Hey dude, just finished the chat with Dan. But "somehow" is wrong, you've put out so much quality content and I love that Graham came on. He is a humble man, will speak to anyone 😁👌🏻
I would like to say something about the psychedelic experience. We humans do not need to eat the cactus (metaphor), we can do these spiritual trips perfectly well without them. We also do not have to meditate for decades or stare at a blank wall until our legs drop off. There are simple, perfectly natural ways of getting into the higher realms and having fun there. The moment I decided that indeed, Project Sanctuary was a better way came when I took some mushrooms after some years and the tunnels through the light were veritably lame compared to what my brain can do without them. We have amazing hardware but boy oh boy does our software suck!
It's definitely personal. I used to do quite a few psychedelics but haven't touched them in years and have no interest. I don't even smoke marijuana or drink anymore besides a couple times a month. I do enjoy nicotine and caffeine though! Interesting how our tastes change over time
Been reading and listening to GH content for thirty years. Congratulations on a detailed and flowing interview. Maybe polish up the aesthetics and have both of you sitting on the same level, as opposed to you up on a chair. Maybe a fireside setting or library den next time...I'm sure you'll move on to other great interviews, so plenty of time 👌
Lately I've been wondering if maybe the entities we interact with on tryptamines are the purveyors of our ideas Our connection to them is strongest during these altered states, so that's why they offer increased creativity
This point came up in conversation today, was the fruit eaten in eden a psychedelic? Was that what made them the same as Gods? Could see good and evil?
@AH.135 the church has historically always tried to make people feel powerless so they are obedient, convince them that only their priests can communicate with God and they'll do anything the church wants If people have psychedelics to directly experience that they are God, that we're all part of the same thing, then the church loses all its power, so they try and cut us off from the plant and fungus teachers 🤔
I have questions about what Hancock says about the Sphinx being 12,000 years old. The Sphinx is depicted wearing a Nemes, a royal headdress with the oldest depiction found in the tomb of King Dan (the term Pharaoh did not exist until the New Kingdom period) of the First Dynasty on a plague. The first statue found depicted the Nemes is of King Djoser of the Third Dynasty. Is Hancock suggesting that the head of the Sphinx was an addition made thousands of years later onto the body? I ask because our current archeological evidence suggests that the Pschent predates the Nemes especially its components of the Hedjet & Deshret.
The nemes could have been ancestor worship. I personally think that's likely because there is a clear degradation of technique. Go to the British Museum and see for yourself. The oldest statues are sublime, with crude heiroglyphs clearly not the the same facility with stone. It's just graffiti. But the nemes is present.
Isn't his argument that it's not the original head? IIRC he supports the idea that it was once a full lion facing a certain constellation until it was later recarved.
You know what's funny, I disagree more with Graham than I agree with, but I do find him a brilliant and kindhearted man. Like to hear him speak a lot and support his right to have an alternative view on history. Totally disgusting the ad hominem thrown at him.
Wow! Id never yeard that the souls leave ti the belt if orion and then onto the milkyway ti be confronted about the lives we'd led and choices we made. Thafs incredible that multiple ancient cultures that never could have met one another all share that same tale of this journey. I havs firmly believed thst when we die, our souls go ti the heavens in the stars and there we exist in and amongst them, but in our true form. Ive actually seen this.
Multiple cultures don't believe it. Even the Egyptians didn't believe it. They believed the soul went to the underworld. The other place he mentions is in the USA. It dates to 1100AD and they left ZERO written information. He just made it up. That's what he does.
ChatGPT: “Graham Hancock, building upon Robert Bauval's Orion Correlation Theory (OCT), suggests that the alignment of the Giza pyramids mirrors the stars of Orion's Belt as they appeared around 10,500 BC. He argues that during this epoch, the orientation of these stars closely matched the layout of the pyramids, implying a deliberate correlation by the ancient builders. However, this hypothesis has been met with skepticism within the academic community. Astronomers such as Ed Krupp and Tony Fairall have analyzed the angles formed by Orion's Belt during the proposed era and found discrepancies. Their studies indicate that the angle of Orion's Belt around 10,500 BC was approximately 47 to 50 degrees, while the pyramids' alignment is about 38 degrees, resulting in a misalignment of 9 to 12 degrees.” How does Hancock respond to this claim? Btw, I’m team Hancock, I’m just curious.
@@charleswalker2484 Oh gosh. No one you would know, probably. Most of my other interviews are random academics from liberal arts fields. Graham is my most high profile interview by far, and I wouldn't expect any other prominent names. Next two episodes are recorded (biweekly releases) One is a Professor of Early Modern History at the University of Bergen (formerly a visting Professor at Columbia) and the second is a guy named Red Tail Hawk who is in some RW circles on Twitter
Still watching, but the Cahokia mention stopped me, to make this post. I study alignments and symbology of sites. Cahokia is an on the ground representation of the constellation Draco, and I've made a graphic picture showing how it works. If you'd like to see it, let me know. I can email you with this screen name. On with the show.
The whole of Ireland was a Norman colony just like England. Well, he ain’t a historian, he ain’t an archaeologist, he’s a journalist. A ‘profession’ noted for deceit and spin in order to sell a story.
Hancock is still pulling on the Clovis First teat, eh?. Would be interesting to see him develop a detailed and substantiated timeline for his version of what happened during the affair?
Graham is undeniably right about there being an advanced global civilisation. The evidence is overwhelming in the megalithic works all over the globe. Let alone the astronomical and mathematical aspects
The older I get, the more apparent these patterns become. Time and time again, you see this behavior in academia, and you have to wonder what it guiding them to such things. Easy to say it's just human nature, sure, but could there be more to it? Especially when you see it happening across the world, throughout many disciplines and sectors? Seems weird to call it 'demonic', but I'll be damned if there doesn't seem to be some overarching guidance behind the scenes. And even GH is susceptible to it when you hear him causally remarking on how he had "indigenous" scientists involved, as though their being "indigenous" somehow made them better scientists - brown people knowing more about brown people than white folks ever could understand. He honestly believes that, but he wouldn't give that same credit to the "indigenous" European scientists studying European archeology.
I would like to here about the conflict between the islands of the UK, I recall the endless news back then, but never really understood. Yes, everyone has a right to contribute to the misty past, "Archaeology" is taking on an immense undertaking of multidisciplinary knowledge, yet "academia" has so much incorrect. Just look at the stratigraphy of this planet and tell me it is uniformitarian, plus all our traditions say it was from Space Falls. There is a conspiracy, someone on the upper echelon knows, because the radiant point of our most recent meteor stream is being erased from the record. Look for yourselves, in the older translations of traditions it is there and the new and approved translations it is missing.
Billy Carson claimed the crucifixion is not mentioned in the oldest complete New Testament. He has said it for years. He was exposed to be wrong about this and many other things. "Academia" isn't as gang. It is people with real expertise which is proven by gaining degrees and doctorates and publishing work in Peer Review journals which is backed up by real testable evidence. This published work is thoroughly checked by other experts as is the evidence presented. Billy Carson went straight to the public and made millions claiming he was an expert and he was exposed and a liar and fraud who had never even read these books or e would know the content. He has also said for years that the biblical creation myth is taken from the Sumarians "word for word". This was also proven to be cemplete lies. Why is is bad to expose lies? Is academics lied they would be exposed immediately in Peer review journals.
Astrology? Really? I live in a rural area. I love watching the night sky. Yet, there’s only two constellations that I can identify immediately, the Big Dipper and Cassiopeia. Here’s the thing. Do you honestly think that over thousands of years, across the many civilizations across the planet that they all saw the same patterns in the sky and called them all by the same names and for the same reasons? I’m quite sure that different people across the globe saw different patterns in the night sky and made up much different stories about them. Just a thought.
Still watching, and point 2 made me stop again, hehe. Graham mentioned symbolically traveling across the Milky Way in symbology. Same can be said of the "Book of the Dead" interpretation of Budge and others, to be incorrect. The scroll, and others, explain, not the afterlife, but, the coming to Earth to be human, and going through the 12 signs, as a human experience, and to graduate each sign, until you get to the end of the zodiac and go back to the source. It's not about being dead. It explains human life. Anyway back to the show.
So bizarre to keep asking if god is constrained, what would be the alternative? In any complex system if you change one value it has systemic changes, we can't speculate on what god could have done just as we cant conceive of what god is. This is simply how it is. How could you have a complex universe that wasnt finely tuned alex?
As Graham’s influence grew, and grew, and his audience became dumber and dumber, archaeologists became more and more frustrated with Hancock for spreading absolute BS.
I’m not sure why Graham’s unethical statements are so applauded. I suppose they appeal to the simple minded who seek easy answers to complex questions. Bad information regarding prehistory can lead to bad outcomes.
He says he appeared on Joe Rogan to "have respectable dialogue about the past". Graham Hancock was the one who brought up Dibble mentioning white supremacy in an online article for academics. Hancock keeps claiming Dibble called him a white supremacist which is a lie. Graham attempted a gotcha, by asking if "big archaeology" existed and made a big deal about a twitter post which put "big archaeology" in scare quotes. When Dibble pointed this out Graham refused to accept this obvious joke as he was using his usual archaeology is a monolith argument. Dibble made a couple of mistakes and GRaham and his followers have tried to turn these errors into deliberate lies. The campaign of hatred against him is disgusting. It included Dedunknig making videos to mislead the publiic into believing he worked with native American bones. Dibble is just a teacher at a college in Wales. And yet Hancock is playing victim yet again. Look at Hancock's video with Dedunknig, he attacks every single person who has ever dared to fact check his claims.
I find it very telling that the first thing Hancock does in this interview is attack the vast majority of archeologists. If you feel the need to start the conversation by destroying those who disagree with you, that tells me you don’t have a strong argument yourself. Doubly funny is that fact that halfway through the interview, GH says that archeologists approach amounts to, “The bits of evidence that support our ideas we’ll accept and the bits that don’t we reject.” How is that not *exactly* what he himself is doing? How is he so thoroughly unaware of the ridiculous levels of hypocrisy he’s displaying?
@@Manbearpig4456I’m not saying archeologist have been kind to Hancock. Many have not. I’m saying that if you *start* by attacking people, it doesn’t make me trust your ideas. Also, I’ve seen people on the other side of their argument go out of their way to say that they’re not calling GH a racist, but rather they’re pointing out the fact that racists and actual Nazis have supported many of the same ideas GH is a proponent of, and that GH needs to demonstrate some awareness of this fact. It’s a nuanced but important difference.
What? That's not the first thing he does in this interview. That's clearly multiple small clips edited by me to show what content is in the interview. The first thing Graham does in this interview is talk about where he is from.
Nice convo and very cool to see. As usual, Graham insists that archaeologists are blocking the conversation but does not acknowledge his own role in restricting ideas from reaching the general public. Hate to say it but listening to the usual suspects is growing boring. They are not progressing the conversation but rather just holding the microphone and reaping the benefits of being in the limelight. Careful, the line between a diligent seeker of truth and someone enjoying the ride but not really caring for that which is is difficult to distinguish in a world that does not even know nothing.
@@Illegitimate_Scholar He's in my way, like all the others who talk and talk but have already had their ideas considered by the world. He is the face of the alternative ideas and has full capacity to acknowledge research that disproves what he is saying but why would anyone lift a finger for ideas that disprove their life's work and would really dampen their sun run of being viewed by society so positively?
Meanwhile my twitter is suspended permanently while Elon Musk is circle jerked by the likes of Rogan and Graham--oh what a savior, he alone owns a platform that has muted my very legitimate work. It's tiresome dealing with this paradigm of ignorance when on the other side with thousands of breakthroughs simply kept under wraps because the likes of Graham who are the actual alternative avenues to shortcut ideas to be considered by the general public that are being prevented from consideration through the scientific method and he doesn't actually acknowledge merit when it is put before him. He speaks of being silenced while we all listen to him speak and real ideas are literally unheard by the general public and thus unconsidered. His ideas are considered. Its ridiculous and vomit inducing sometimes.
@@earthexpanded I'm not sure that's fair to him. Dedunking Dan, a colleague of mine, is someone who has disagreed publically with Graham on many occasions but has still had support from Graham in boosting his content and appearing on his show. And you can clearly see that my channel is VERY small, but he was still willing to talk to me. This doesn't benefit him in any serious way.
@@Illegitimate_Scholar I am the discoverer of the theory of everything in 2014 and since then have made thousands of discoveries. Graham ignores me every time I contact him. Why? Because I disproved what he says. Its simple. Same for Randall Carlson--I actually pissed him off to a point where his entire crew won't talk to me even though initially they did. He said I was wrong and since I have been kept as an outsider to both the scientific community and the alternative community because no one in those positions benefit from letting someone tell the world why they are all wrong with specificity. Sure, Graham plays the game well, but he is just as territorial as anyone else--its his territory and he won't let someone in who is an actual threat to him. If you are just there to stroke his ego then he's happy to get another notch on his belt.
Graham is quack with no evidence for his claims. He’s a very good fiction writer and speaker, but he’s just a grifter who pedals pseudoarcheology and pseudohistory. He’s not open to the possibility of being wrong because that would dismantle his entire career. If you’re actually interested in history and archeology then go interview and read the works of real historians and archeologists.
Actually you couldn't be more wrong I used to watch Hancock I used to watch ben and Brien and heavy set guy and then I woke up and realized they don't have any proof, and they can theorize as much as they want it doesn't make it any more true, unless they bring out one of these big high-tech machines I don't believe they're bullshit anymore. The argument that all this would take so long to do all they had was time and people.
He is conman . I am a retired Archaeogist, EVIDENCE is required and it has to be CRITICALLY examined always : what can be wrong with my claims and interpretations. This conman is just pandering to people with no conservatives with hard evidence. Archaeology is a a set of very hard work that is open to any new evidence. Remember that he makes wild fantasy claims with NO EVIDENCE to sell books and videos to a vast audience of low educated, low experience in the long complex c 170 years of each excavation and studies that has built up what we now know. I challenge you where has Archaeologists lie and mislead the public . I spent 54 yrs in the field , I have never seen archaeologists lie or mislead the public .
You guys make "EDUCATED" guesses all the time which is called SPECULATION, so take your grandstanding and shove it up your pompous rump, CONMAN. 54 years my rear! coming here with that BS.
and you want an example? How about that the Egyptians made a mistake with the bent pyramid and because of cracks decided to lower the slant? Where is that EVIDENCE written from the builders themselves, you twat. We'll all wait, but you know it's speculation. No different than Hancock.
I was waiting for a comment like this. You bring accusations but no specific complaints. Assertions he brings no evidence. I have videos on this channel where I explicitly show claims by an Archaeologists that are verifiably false, proven by published scholarly research by other Archaeologists. That archaeologist is lauded by the SAA. You are welcome to view them, but you seem to have already made up your mind.
Don't assume others people's level of education. I disagree with most of what Hancock has to say, so what? Archeology has no clue about how many things were achieved. The boxes of the Serapium, the accuracy of the pre dynastic vases, the movement of big blocks in general, the accuracy of the "Ramses" statues, and the genetic legacy of many people's around the world. When your explanation is utterly implausible, conjecture may lead to more sensible propositions.
Still waiting for Graham Hancock to find the work of Geoffrey Drumm. Geoff (and by extention the ISIDA project), has figured out the functions of the pyramids.
@@PAUL1sLOVE It's a coined phrase statement, I 've already given you answers to your question on the other posting trying to call me out, you never responded as well, so maybe you need to not mistake my condensing tone as a lack of education but of your own.
"...and still do have a strong identification with Scotland's liberation struggles against England. And the mood of rebellion that Scotland represents." **Laughs you out of the room in American.**
Graham is an absolute legend
Cannot believe this happened
This is the pinnacle of my time creating content, thank you to everyone who has been here supporting me and welcome to any newcomers.
I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.
Much deserved 😊
I did! Congrats for this milestone, Sam.
Great conversation sir.
Well done!
He is indeed. A mountain of knowledge.
I'm here because Graham told me too! I'm staying because this Illegitimate human is next level!
thank you!
I love it when he swears for underlining a point, not for a sentence filling purpose.
yes. Uses them extremely well
Thats the Scot in him, a swear word is often punctuation or emphasis. If you must use the english language, best to bastardise it
Was reading this and thought he was about to drop an F bomb at 0:39 lol
You guys are such great heroes (Graham, and Scholar, Dedunking etc). The world is better because of you
I'd say hero is a little strong for me, but thank you
@@Illegitimate_Scholar
What @GoingSouth said!! 👏🏼👍🏼
Hey, thanks for getting greame on, great to see him not having to be defensive. The fact he needs no notes infront of him says a lot.
Brilliant interview and thanks for your work debunking dribble.
Honestly love Mr Hancock and his devotion to finding out truths. To have hate for being guilty of only that is incredibly showing.
Thankyou both.
Thank you!
Fantastic interaction, thanks!❤
Dan Richards introduced you to me. This interview earned you a sub. Fantastic work. Thank you
thank you!
Thats where i heard of it. Dan seems a brilliant guy
@@AH.135 I recon Dan will disappear from utube if he carries on doxing people he doesn't agree with.
The man's third rate if you're asking me.
@@vespasian266 Doxing is disclosing personal information to the public, Has Dan done this like giving out personal home addresses or phone numbers in any video?
Look through them?
Very interesting discussion and you did a good job with adding some extra graphics at suitable places.
thanks! Some was specifics from Graham
This channel deserves much more recognition. I hope you get your Joe Rogan moment. Glad Graham is supporting you. Keep up the good work.
I'd love to go on Rogan, but talking to Graham, to me, is higher than that!
@@Illegitimate_ScholarI know what you mean. I'd just like to see you on there as I think it would give you a greater audience.
Work is done, dinner is served, gingerbread loaf is in the oven and my bowl is currently packed. Thank you for the perfect ending to a long yet lovely day 💯
wonderful! Hope it was enjoyable!
Like button smashed three times
Thank you!
Ive always (several decades) looked at what GH does as investigative anthropology and comparitive mythology. Hes essentially a historian. One of the best.
me too!
He's a REPORTER. He informs. He brings History to people, which is awesome.
Great guest, due to having him on - I now see your channel. Good work!
Hell yeah, watching now 💪
thank you!
Graham Hancock, the vindicated, brought me to your channel. May he vindicate you in the presence of the council, which is in Heliopolis, on that night of the evening meal, on that night of battle, and on that day of destroying the enemies of the lord of all.
Graham sent me here from X, glad to find another human asking the hard questions =)
Gave a huge thumbs up to the series on Netflix as soon as it was available. I unsubscribed from Netflix as soon as I had finished watching the series. I hope they got the message that we want more of this.
Perfect!
Same 😂
lol I did the same thing with Cobra Kai. Paid one month, watched the series, then immediately cancelled and told them because of their support of the great Con-artist Obama I'll never give them any more money than that.
@@Illegitimate_Scholar my comment was removed here too? Why? There was nothing mean or sinister about it?
@@francischambless5919 I have not removed a single comment from anyone. I think something is wrong with UA-cam's commenting, my own comments are also disappearing
Great interview Mr Scholar👊💪 keep up the great work🥰
thank you!
He is not a scholar, he's a snake oil salesman
I'm subbing because Graham asked me to consider this page. You know it's got to be good if Graham recommends it. 😊
I'm watching because Graham said to. As I am watching just have to mention that interviewer and the subject should be sitting in same chairs. It's a small thing in person, but on camera it's a big deal. That said I think Mr. Hancock has done a huge service to human history and I am grateful to know of him and his work.
Congratulations on this huge interview dude!
Thank you!
I'm one of those people that think archeology and history has been sketchy for a long time. We follow it when we grow up, obey that it's the law and if we start asking questions, doubting it by looking for answers from "other" sources, then we have a problem. "If only you knew how bad things really are"
Whatever you do, don’t read Dave Irving’s work
It is tiring enough when Graham Hancock constantly plays victim based despite earning more money and having bigger than any genuine archaeologist on Earth. If archaeologists ignore him then he is the victim because they don't take his ideas seriously. If they look at his ideas and explain why they think he is wrong, then he accuses them of persecuting him.
Now you are trying to claim the same thing? Who makes you "obey" what we know about history and archaeology as "law"? What "problem" do you have if you believe in Atlantis?
There isn't a global conspiracy against Graham, just a lot of people with much greater knowledge who think he is wrong.
@@AnyoneCanSee Come on now, his comment was much more general than that.
@@Vingul - Sorry if I was unclear. I wrote, "Who makes you "obey" what we know about history and archaeology as "law"?" As that is so general, I thought it was clear in context that I then used Atlantis as an example.
@@AnyoneCanSee There are immense social pressures regarding certain topics that some of us believe are incorrect, and you can become a social pariah and, in some Western countries, even be thrown in jail merely for questioning the "accepted" narrative. Even if the narrative was correct, I find that pretty concerning.
Comment for the algo! First time viewer but I’m hitting subscribe.
Welcome to New England Graham ❤
Nice! Been waiting for this. Back in a couple hours.
thank you!
This is an excellent podcast, it flowed very naturally and gave fresh insights.
I learned more about the significance of the number 72, which is something that I've been pondering. Hearing the navel of the world is 72 degrees off eygpt is fascinating. As a strong believer in the world navigating abilities of our ancestors, I'm impressed to realize they almost certainly had a system similar to our coordinate system.
They clearly had advanced knowledge of longitude, which we didn't go into explicitly here, but Graham has elsewhere
Excellent work dude!
Thank you!
This word is ruined by Reddit but this is pretty epic, man. Good for you. Been checking in on your content on and off since you were on Good Ol Boyz a year or two back and it's cool that you're seeing success.
lol wow, yeah I remember your name! It's pretty great, thank you
Oh wow I did not expect that.
Neither did I
Brilliant interview, congrats and very well done 👏 ❤
Point 3. Speaking with some archaeologist friends, I made them raise their eyebrows with a "hmm". I was going through videos of the old Egyptian Museum, and bumped into 3 statues standing next to each other, of Sesostris lll. As the camera panned by, it hit me. I searched the internet for pics of him and found a profile of his head, and it matched perfectly with the Sphinx profile I have. I discussed this with a few people, and they all agreed, that Sesostris was an egomaniac, along the lines of Rameses, making statues of himself everywhere, stamping his name on everything, and that recarving the Sphinx would not be beyond him. I have a profile comparison pic to send, if you wish.
Awesome, looking forward to this one. Quick question though; would it be possible to get the audio of this on Spotify? - I really enjoy listening to podcasts when going on hikes.
I microdose 🍄 quite often, and it really feels like its incredibly beneficial for my brain
I kind of suspect we've evolved alongside these, it feels like a vitamin for my brain, my memory recall is much better, my precision when doing anything that requires depth perception is waaaaay better
It also really makes me appreciate other people more, i can feel my emotions more, i actually want to socialize and listen to others, it just makes sense that our ancestors would want all these benefits
I really believe they probably Microdosed too, if only for hunting trips or breeding or whatever, also with macro doses for shamanic/healing purposes
I vaguely remember reading a theory like this once
@Illegitimate_Scholar the stoned ape theory, I think Terence McKenna came up with that, is the most popular
Do not look up mushrooms hooked up to ai and given legs. 😅
As Praveen Mohan put it: "If monkeys eat shr0umeys, do monkeys use them or do they use monkeys?"
@michaelmurray6577 haha funny you mentioned that, I just saw it on my Google news feed today 😆
Subscribed and will watch very soon. Sounds promising!
Ooooooh.. We got to this point already??? 🎉
somehow
@Illegitimate_Scholar Hey dude, just finished the chat with Dan. But "somehow" is wrong, you've put out so much quality content and I love that Graham came on. He is a humble man, will speak to anyone 😁👌🏻
@michaelmurray6577thank you!
@@Illegitimate_Scholar *By anyone I mean channels of any size. Of course he should talk to someone like you. Obviously.
Great interview👌
I would like to say something about the psychedelic experience. We humans do not need to eat the cactus (metaphor), we can do these spiritual trips perfectly well without them. We also do not have to meditate for decades or stare at a blank wall until our legs drop off. There are simple, perfectly natural ways of getting into the higher realms and having fun there. The moment I decided that indeed, Project Sanctuary was a better way came when I took some mushrooms after some years and the tunnels through the light were veritably lame compared to what my brain can do without them. We have amazing hardware but boy oh boy does our software suck!
It's definitely personal.
I used to do quite a few psychedelics but haven't touched them in years and have no interest. I don't even smoke marijuana or drink anymore besides a couple times a month.
I do enjoy nicotine and caffeine though! Interesting how our tastes change over time
I didnt know there was a season 2 until this video 😱
Been reading and listening to GH content for thirty years. Congratulations on a detailed and flowing interview. Maybe polish up the aesthetics and have both of you sitting on the same level, as opposed to you up on a chair. Maybe a fireside setting or library den next time...I'm sure you'll move on to other great interviews, so plenty of time 👌
Lately I've been wondering if maybe the entities we interact with on tryptamines are the purveyors of our ideas
Our connection to them is strongest during these altered states, so that's why they offer increased creativity
Primarily our novel ideas 💡
This point came up in conversation today, was the fruit eaten in eden a psychedelic?
Was that what made them the same as Gods? Could see good and evil?
@AH.135 the church has historically always tried to make people feel powerless so they are obedient, convince them that only their priests can communicate with God and they'll do anything the church wants
If people have psychedelics to directly experience that they are God, that we're all part of the same thing, then the church loses all its power, so they try and cut us off from the plant and fungus teachers
🤔
no idea, never done it myself
Thanks!
Graham is a small target compared to Velikovsky. But he's already being dealt with... long live Graham Hancock!
I have questions about what Hancock says about the Sphinx being 12,000 years old.
The Sphinx is depicted wearing a Nemes, a royal headdress with the oldest depiction found in the tomb of King Dan (the term Pharaoh did not exist until the New Kingdom period) of the First Dynasty on a plague. The first statue found depicted the Nemes is of King Djoser of the Third Dynasty.
Is Hancock suggesting that the head of the Sphinx was an addition made thousands of years later onto the body? I ask because our current archeological evidence suggests that the Pschent predates the Nemes especially its components of the Hedjet & Deshret.
The nemes could have been ancestor worship. I personally think that's likely because there is a clear degradation of technique. Go to the British Museum and see for yourself. The oldest statues are sublime, with crude heiroglyphs clearly not the the same facility with stone. It's just graffiti. But the nemes is present.
Isn't his argument that it's not the original head?
IIRC he supports the idea that it was once a full lion facing a certain constellation until it was later recarved.
@@Arkantos117 I'm saying that the nemes is not an indication that it's dynastic. Yes, the sphynx was probably a lion head.
There is a mound group in Southern Wi. Koshkinong Golf Club is built on top too. Its beautiful.
sometimes things like golf courses are able to preserve what would otherwise been destroyed! Not ideal but better than nothing
graham sent me :)
You know what's funny, I disagree more with Graham than I agree with, but I do find him a brilliant and kindhearted man. Like to hear him speak a lot and support his right to have an alternative view on history. Totally disgusting the ad hominem thrown at him.
I agree. I don't even really have strong opinions on his theories. One way or the other.
I'm confused why some people are so angry about them
Closing point is exactly truth. I believe the same thing. Little different but I'm sure me and Graham would have a civil discussion 😊
The main point in all of these "theories" is "I believe" - not "I know" or "It has been proven"
@peterlandbo2726 if it's in good faith, then the evidence leads us to believe a certain theory.
Dibble needs a DMT experience, might chill him out and make him more bearable to listen to
It might. Or it would break his brain
@Illegitimate_Scholar He's got nothing to lose, it's already broken.
Wow! Id never yeard that the souls leave ti the belt if orion and then onto the milkyway ti be confronted about the lives we'd led and choices we made. Thafs incredible that multiple ancient cultures that never could have met one another all share that same tale of this journey. I havs firmly believed thst when we die, our souls go ti the heavens in the stars and there we exist in and amongst them, but in our true form. Ive actually seen this.
Multiple cultures don't believe it. Even the Egyptians didn't believe it. They believed the soul went to the underworld. The other place he mentions is in the USA. It dates to 1100AD and they left ZERO written information. He just made it up. That's what he does.
My token sacrifice to the algorithm
I appreciate it 🙏🏼
@Illegitimate_Scholar No worries. Love your work. Keep it up.
If Graham recommends then by all means!
Is there an AC running in the background ?
Air Conditioners don’t have legs
1:17:20
grow!
It's happening!
ChatGPT: “Graham Hancock, building upon Robert Bauval's Orion Correlation Theory (OCT), suggests that the alignment of the Giza pyramids mirrors the stars of Orion's Belt as they appeared around 10,500 BC. He argues that during this epoch, the orientation of these stars closely matched the layout of the pyramids, implying a deliberate correlation by the ancient builders.
However, this hypothesis has been met with skepticism within the academic community. Astronomers such as Ed Krupp and Tony Fairall have analyzed the angles formed by Orion's Belt during the proposed era and found discrepancies. Their studies indicate that the angle of Orion's Belt around 10,500 BC was approximately 47 to 50 degrees, while the pyramids' alignment is about 38 degrees, resulting in a misalignment of 9 to 12 degrees.”
How does Hancock respond to this claim? Btw, I’m team Hancock, I’m just curious.
no idea who you are but if you're gonna have hancock on ill give a watch and a sub to see what's up
Thank you!
@@Illegitimate_Scholar no worries, who else you thinking of having on if you can reveal?
@@charleswalker2484 Oh gosh. No one you would know, probably.
Most of my other interviews are random academics from liberal arts fields.
Graham is my most high profile interview by far, and I wouldn't expect any other prominent names.
Next two episodes are recorded (biweekly releases)
One is a Professor of Early Modern History at the University of Bergen (formerly a visting Professor at Columbia) and the second is a guy named Red Tail Hawk who is in some RW circles on Twitter
@@Illegitimate_Scholar I'll check it out. I listen to podcasts to learn new things mostly.
Still watching, but the Cahokia mention stopped me, to make this post. I study alignments and symbology of sites. Cahokia is an on the ground representation of the constellation Draco, and I've made a graphic picture showing how it works. If you'd like to see it, let me know. I can email you with this screen name. On with the show.
Pause 0:49
The whole of Ireland was a Norman colony just like England. Well, he ain’t a historian, he ain’t an archaeologist, he’s a journalist. A ‘profession’ noted for deceit and spin in order to sell a story.
nice 00:50
Hancock is still pulling on the Clovis First teat, eh?. Would be interesting to see him develop a detailed and substantiated timeline for his version of what happened during the affair?
Graham is undeniably right about there being an advanced global civilisation. The evidence is overwhelming in the megalithic works all over the globe. Let alone the astronomical and mathematical aspects
seminal
Truly
pretty - turning the tables finally on science as vested interest
old ideas Vergil hints at them it seems in his biggest story The Aeneid rebirth/death themes
The older I get, the more apparent these patterns become. Time and time again, you see this behavior in academia, and you have to wonder what it guiding them to such things. Easy to say it's just human nature, sure, but could there be more to it? Especially when you see it happening across the world, throughout many disciplines and sectors? Seems weird to call it 'demonic', but I'll be damned if there doesn't seem to be some overarching guidance behind the scenes. And even GH is susceptible to it when you hear him causally remarking on how he had "indigenous" scientists involved, as though their being "indigenous" somehow made them better scientists - brown people knowing more about brown people than white folks ever could understand. He honestly believes that, but he wouldn't give that same credit to the "indigenous" European scientists studying European archeology.
It's armour
I would like to here about the conflict between the islands of the UK, I recall the endless news back then, but never really understood. Yes, everyone has a right to contribute to the misty past, "Archaeology" is taking on an immense undertaking of multidisciplinary knowledge, yet "academia" has so much incorrect. Just look at the stratigraphy of this planet and tell me it is uniformitarian, plus all our traditions say it was from Space Falls. There is a conspiracy, someone on the upper echelon knows, because the radiant point of our most recent meteor stream is being erased from the record. Look for yourselves, in the older translations of traditions it is there and the new and approved translations it is missing.
WOW!!!
nice 🔥💯💪🏻
Pseudo. A very, very old word. In fact it goes back to Ancient Greek. But, did start being used in its current meaning more recently in the 1800.
some times, brushing in the place can be long....
There's something to be said about academia.
Look what happened to Billy Carson!
Could this happen to Graham Hancock?
Billy Carson claimed the crucifixion is not mentioned in the oldest complete New Testament. He has said it for years. He was exposed to be wrong about this and many other things. "Academia" isn't as gang. It is people with real expertise which is proven by gaining degrees and doctorates and publishing work in Peer Review journals which is backed up by real testable evidence. This published work is thoroughly checked by other experts as is the evidence presented. Billy Carson went straight to the public and made millions claiming he was an expert and he was exposed and a liar and fraud who had never even read these books or e would know the content. He has also said for years that the biblical creation myth is taken from the Sumarians "word for word". This was also proven to be cemplete lies.
Why is is bad to expose lies? Is academics lied they would be exposed immediately in Peer review journals.
Yeap, a legacy from the real Babel tower which is no other than Mount Kailash ..when all ethnic groups lived nearby
Astrology? Really? I live in a rural area. I love watching the night sky. Yet, there’s only two constellations that I can identify immediately, the Big Dipper and Cassiopeia. Here’s the thing. Do you honestly think that over thousands of years, across the many civilizations across the planet that they all saw the same patterns in the sky and called them all by the same names and for the same reasons? I’m quite sure that different people across the globe saw different patterns in the night sky and made up much different stories about them. Just a thought.
Still watching, and point 2 made me stop again, hehe. Graham mentioned symbolically traveling across the Milky Way in symbology. Same can be said of the "Book of the Dead" interpretation of Budge and others, to be incorrect. The scroll, and others, explain, not the afterlife, but, the coming to Earth to be human, and going through the 12 signs, as a human experience, and to graduate each sign, until you get to the end of the zodiac and go back to the source. It's not about being dead. It explains human life. Anyway back to the show.
Who else here bc Mr Hancock told them to?😂
Rethink your seating. You're too high up. Always equal eye to eye contact.
Congrats!!!
It was not my ideal setup, had to do it a hotel
you said you're half irish. I am as well. what's the other half?
Hungarian. 3/4 Irish, 1/4 Hungarian
So bizarre to keep asking if god is constrained, what would be the alternative? In any complex system if you change one value it has systemic changes, we can't speculate on what god could have done just as we cant conceive of what god is. This is simply how it is. How could you have a complex universe that wasnt finely tuned alex?
Proof that Douglas Adams was wrong....the answer is 72 😮
Is it just me or are UA-cam comments BLACK when I type them?
Just you bro
mine are
Syas one reply on your coment but none show. My replies are also not appearing. I guess that reflects the darkness that runs it 😊
As Graham’s influence grew, and grew, and his audience became dumber and dumber, archaeologists became more and more frustrated with Hancock for spreading absolute BS.
@@elizabethstuart8401 cope
I’m not sure why Graham’s unethical statements are so applauded. I suppose they appeal to the simple minded who seek easy answers to complex questions. Bad information regarding prehistory can lead to bad outcomes.
He says he appeared on Joe Rogan to "have respectable dialogue about the past". Graham Hancock was the one who brought up Dibble mentioning white supremacy in an online article for academics. Hancock keeps claiming Dibble called him a white supremacist which is a lie. Graham attempted a gotcha, by asking if "big archaeology" existed and made a big deal about a twitter post which put "big archaeology" in scare quotes. When Dibble pointed this out Graham refused to accept this obvious joke as he was using his usual archaeology is a monolith argument.
Dibble made a couple of mistakes and GRaham and his followers have tried to turn these errors into deliberate lies. The campaign of hatred against him is disgusting. It included Dedunknig making videos to mislead the publiic into believing he worked with native American bones.
Dibble is just a teacher at a college in Wales. And yet Hancock is playing victim yet again.
Look at Hancock's video with Dedunknig, he attacks every single person who has ever dared to fact check his claims.
I find it very telling that the first thing Hancock does in this interview is attack the vast majority of archeologists. If you feel the need to start the conversation by destroying those who disagree with you, that tells me you don’t have a strong argument yourself.
Doubly funny is that fact that halfway through the interview, GH says that archeologists approach amounts to, “The bits of evidence that support our ideas we’ll accept and the bits that don’t we reject.” How is that not *exactly* what he himself is doing? How is he so thoroughly unaware of the ridiculous levels of hypocrisy he’s displaying?
Is that why Hoopes and Hancock called Graham racists then?
@@Manbearpig4456I’m not saying archeologist have been kind to Hancock. Many have not. I’m saying that if you *start* by attacking people, it doesn’t make me trust your ideas.
Also, I’ve seen people on the other side of their argument go out of their way to say that they’re not calling GH a racist, but rather they’re pointing out the fact that racists and actual Nazis have supported many of the same ideas GH is a proponent of, and that GH needs to demonstrate some awareness of this fact. It’s a nuanced but important difference.
What?
That's not the first thing he does in this interview.
That's clearly multiple small clips edited by me to show what content is in the interview.
The first thing Graham does in this interview is talk about where he is from.
Good lord! No free speech for poor Graham, while he flapping his lips all over the place…🤦♀️
Nice convo and very cool to see. As usual, Graham insists that archaeologists are blocking the conversation but does not acknowledge his own role in restricting ideas from reaching the general public. Hate to say it but listening to the usual suspects is growing boring. They are not progressing the conversation but rather just holding the microphone and reaping the benefits of being in the limelight. Careful, the line between a diligent seeker of truth and someone enjoying the ride but not really caring for that which is is difficult to distinguish in a world that does not even know nothing.
Restricting ideas from reaching the general public? What do you mean? How does Graham do that?
@@Illegitimate_Scholar He's in my way, like all the others who talk and talk but have already had their ideas considered by the world. He is the face of the alternative ideas and has full capacity to acknowledge research that disproves what he is saying but why would anyone lift a finger for ideas that disprove their life's work and would really dampen their sun run of being viewed by society so positively?
Meanwhile my twitter is suspended permanently while Elon Musk is circle jerked by the likes of Rogan and Graham--oh what a savior, he alone owns a platform that has muted my very legitimate work. It's tiresome dealing with this paradigm of ignorance when on the other side with thousands of breakthroughs simply kept under wraps because the likes of Graham who are the actual alternative avenues to shortcut ideas to be considered by the general public that are being prevented from consideration through the scientific method and he doesn't actually acknowledge merit when it is put before him. He speaks of being silenced while we all listen to him speak and real ideas are literally unheard by the general public and thus unconsidered. His ideas are considered. Its ridiculous and vomit inducing sometimes.
@@earthexpanded I'm not sure that's fair to him.
Dedunking Dan, a colleague of mine, is someone who has disagreed publically with Graham on many occasions but has still had support from Graham in boosting his content and appearing on his show.
And you can clearly see that my channel is VERY small, but he was still willing to talk to me. This doesn't benefit him in any serious way.
@@Illegitimate_Scholar I am the discoverer of the theory of everything in 2014 and since then have made thousands of discoveries. Graham ignores me every time I contact him. Why? Because I disproved what he says. Its simple. Same for Randall Carlson--I actually pissed him off to a point where his entire crew won't talk to me even though initially they did. He said I was wrong and since I have been kept as an outsider to both the scientific community and the alternative community because no one in those positions benefit from letting someone tell the world why they are all wrong with specificity.
Sure, Graham plays the game well, but he is just as territorial as anyone else--its his territory and he won't let someone in who is an actual threat to him. If you are just there to stroke his ego then he's happy to get another notch on his belt.
Graham is quack with no evidence for his claims. He’s a very good fiction writer and speaker, but he’s just a grifter who pedals pseudoarcheology and pseudohistory. He’s not open to the possibility of being wrong because that would dismantle his entire career.
If you’re actually interested in history and archeology then go interview and read the works of real historians and archeologists.
You didn't watch the interview
@ yes I did. I waited until it was done to comment.
Actually you couldn't be more wrong I used to watch Hancock I used to watch ben and Brien and heavy set guy and then I woke up and realized they don't have any proof, and they can theorize as much as they want it doesn't make it any more true, unless they bring out one of these big high-tech machines I don't believe they're bullshit anymore. The argument that all this would take so long to do all they had was time and people.
Wrong about what? Did you even watch the video?
“Heavy set guy” lol…. Yeah you clearly paid a lot of attention when you supposedly watched these guys.
He is conman . I am a retired Archaeogist, EVIDENCE is required and it has to be CRITICALLY examined always : what can be wrong with my claims and interpretations. This conman is just pandering to people with no conservatives with hard evidence. Archaeology is a a set of very hard work that is open to any new evidence. Remember that he makes wild fantasy claims with NO EVIDENCE to sell books and videos to a vast audience of low educated, low experience in the long complex c 170 years of each excavation and studies that has built up what we now know. I challenge you where has Archaeologists lie and mislead the public . I spent 54 yrs in the field , I have never seen archaeologists lie or mislead the public .
You guys make "EDUCATED" guesses all the time which is called SPECULATION, so take your grandstanding and shove it up your pompous rump, CONMAN. 54 years my rear! coming here with that BS.
and you want an example? How about that the Egyptians made a mistake with the bent pyramid and because of cracks decided to lower the slant? Where is that EVIDENCE written from the builders themselves, you twat. We'll all wait, but you know it's speculation. No different than Hancock.
I was waiting for a comment like this.
You bring accusations but no specific complaints.
Assertions he brings no evidence.
I have videos on this channel where I explicitly show claims by an Archaeologists that are verifiably false, proven by published scholarly research by other Archaeologists. That archaeologist is lauded by the SAA.
You are welcome to view them, but you seem to have already made up your mind.
Don't assume others people's level of education. I disagree with most of what Hancock has to say, so what? Archeology has no clue about how many things were achieved. The boxes of the Serapium, the accuracy of the pre dynastic vases, the movement of big blocks in general, the accuracy of the "Ramses" statues, and the genetic legacy of many people's around the world. When your explanation is utterly implausible, conjecture may lead to more sensible propositions.
What’s this critically examined evidence that says Khafre build the valley temple?
Still waiting for Graham Hancock to find the work of Geoffrey Drumm. Geoff (and by extention the ISIDA project), has figured out the functions of the pyramids.
I'm skeptical of any person wanting me to buy a book to get the answers.
@@ExessiveGK Im glad you can see that Geoff has the answers. Also, you dont have to buy anything, just watch his videos.
Unless thats too hard.
@@PAUL1sLOVE It's a coined phrase statement, I 've already given you answers to your question on the other posting trying to call me out, you never responded as well, so maybe you need to not mistake my condensing tone as a lack of education but of your own.
No sense argue with you bud
what would you argue with me about?
GTH
Huh?
LOL neither of you are interested in the truth
wahhhhh
@@Illegitimate_Scholar LOL Exactly what you sound like, yes
@@MrProccy wahhhhhhhh
Reddit is that way ------>
"...and still do have a strong identification with Scotland's liberation struggles against England. And the mood of rebellion that Scotland represents."
**Laughs you out of the room in American.**
o7,🦫🦫🦫🦫
o7 🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌