The MAGIC of Pultec EQ on Bass | Bass Tone Tuesday

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @danielcorrigan8805
    @danielcorrigan8805 13 днів тому +1

    It's wild that by cutting low end it sounds deeper. I understand why, obviously sub lows (50 and under) is muddy but its a super sick technique.

    • @IvanBassist
      @IvanBassist  13 днів тому

      Pretty interesting, right? 😁

  • @frankmarini5391
    @frankmarini5391 15 днів тому +4

    Ivan-- from the title, I thought you were going to talk about the Lowrider bass pedal from Zerofiveaudio. They make a stompbox version of the pultec bass trick, it add thickness to your low-end at specific frequencies. Jean from the Wetterbass turned me onto it.

    • @IvanBassist
      @IvanBassist  15 днів тому

      Cool! Didn’t know about that one. Thanks for sharing!

  • @christopherstorrier5560
    @christopherstorrier5560 15 днів тому

    Pultec is also a technique used with a HPF & a little bass boost...i've used a Broughton HPF/LPF pedal in my bass amps effects loop for 6 months now, very happy with the results...i had never heard of it till i watched "Wetter Bass" video where he uses a HPF & a little bass boost to get a tighter bottom end...talking bass obviously...lol...neat when used mixing bass into the rest of the track....

  • @rante1318
    @rante1318 8 днів тому

    De que país sos craaack?

  • @FooVines
    @FooVines 15 днів тому

    fantastic video! but i have to say, with my headphes it was easier to hear the trick when you did it on the low frequencies. on the high ones i really had to concentrate.
    For me the effect was almost reminescent of a compressor in the way that more notes projected an even fullness, not only on the Estring (for example) and the notes on the a, or d string get thinner. with your eq trick activated i thought that the a and d string were bringing more bass foundation to the table while the estring did not overpower in contrast and it did not sound boomy.
    One question remains for me: is it important in which order the high-pass and the bass boost (or low pass and high boost) sit?
    in my teaching room i run a simple alway on HPF in the Master effects loop of my amp to keep things less boomy for my colleagues and that works quite well, but i am yet to gain experience with this stuff live or while recording...

    • @IvanBassist
      @IvanBassist  15 днів тому +1

      Do you mean at which frequency or where in the signal chain?

    • @FooVines
      @FooVines 15 днів тому

      @IvanBassist where in signal chain. So is it important if i go HPF->BassBoost or instead BassBoost->HPF?

    • @IvanBassist
      @IvanBassist  14 днів тому +1

      I am not sure where in the circuitry most of the units have the HPF, but I think it is: HPF -> Bass Boost. With that being said, the best way to test this is to try both option and listen to what sounds the best in your context :)

    • @FooVines
      @FooVines 13 днів тому

      @@IvanBassist thanks!

  • @tortillaman2491
    @tortillaman2491 15 днів тому +2

    When you mentioned a Pultec rackmount EQ, I thought you were gonna pull out a real $4K Pultec. I didn't expect a plug-in you downloaded for $80. LOL.

    • @IvanBassist
      @IvanBassist  15 днів тому +3

      Does the trick though 🤷🏽‍♂️😅

    • @het_gele_teken
      @het_gele_teken 15 днів тому +1

      @@IvanBassistBut definitely not as impressive…

    • @tortillaman2491
      @tortillaman2491 15 днів тому

      @ Yep. I downloaded a bunch of plug-ins and wasn't impressed. So I bit the bullet and financed a bunch of analog gear. There's something about hardware with real circuitry, transformers, tubes, etc,. that warms up your tone like no software can.

    • @taylorhilyard8661
      @taylorhilyard8661 13 днів тому +1

      Y’all touring with a pultec in the rack?

  • @chrisparker5278
    @chrisparker5278 15 днів тому

    First!