NATO's Deadliest Rocket Artillery System

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @GamezCritic
    @GamezCritic Рік тому +27

    NATO's deadliest rocket systems includes a system by China and Russia? Remove the NATO part from the title and this will make a bit more sense.

  • @dnate697
    @dnate697 Рік тому +2

    Developed in the 70s, started service in 1983 and went straight to Germany.

  • @duckjoss2206
    @duckjoss2206 Рік тому +1

    Make more about armored vehicle

  • @digitalgenre7194
    @digitalgenre7194 Рік тому +5

    Good job Man. I enjoyed the video but I am not sure you know what NATO is.

  • @bc-guy852
    @bc-guy852 Рік тому +3

    Nice job on this!!
    I see you get a lot of views but not a lot of comments... may I make a few observations? NOT in any particular order.
    - your title - "Top 10 Best" - sort of a conflict right there. Either top-10 or best - both sounds odd... IMO 'Best of the best' or something that makes logical and grammatical sense in English
    - background music. It's okay at best. LESS of it - lower level overall - ESPECIALLY at the end! Not sure we need background music at all.
    - choppy. In some video segments the speed is already sped up - not sure if you did that or it was the source. that is fine. But you combine that - with rapid-fire snippets of video. It might seem like a long time during rendering but when I'm trying to concentrate on what you're saying as well - - much of that rapid-fire video is lost (or annoying). What's the rush?
    - subtitles - do they work in all your videos? I almost always turn them ON - auto-English if it's available - then it's even in sync. And then I play these while working around my home - instead of music - so I often don't even see the video - or in the distance. So I do use the subtitles. If scan a video and like it - I'll then re-watch it from closer perhaps. LOTS of material out there now...
    I listen on a MS Surface - to a 50" PDP with a THX sub-sat system. Your sound quality is good - no plosives and only one instance of sibilance - so way to go!
    that's it - I hope you don't mind a few constructive notes?
    Best of luck - I'll check out a few more or your uploads.

  • @Matik182
    @Matik182 Рік тому +3

    WTF is this? NATO's Deadliest Rocket Artillery System... then China and Russia. Also RM-70 is veeery old. Its now being upgraded as RM-70 Vampire

  • @dannygelbart6827
    @dannygelbart6827 Рік тому +1

    Why does @SPOTLIGHT say NATO artillery rocket systems, then show china, israel, belarus and russia...

  • @supervideo2969
    @supervideo2969 Рік тому +2

    Dangerous

  • @sowalive314
    @sowalive314 Рік тому +2

    the best 👊

  • @NetRolller3D
    @NetRolller3D Рік тому +2

    The HIMARS is both #10 and #3?

    • @omaconomacon4660
      @omaconomacon4660 Рік тому

      Different models with different capabilities

    • @NetRolller3D
      @NetRolller3D Рік тому

      @@omaconomacon4660 Both are about the M142 HIMARS, of which there's only one variant in service. It's not like the M270 where an A2 js very different from an A0 or B1.

  • @johnholeman2966
    @johnholeman2966 Рік тому

    You should hear about the LASER TURRET on the round wing air/space craft.

  • @stolly27
    @stolly27 Рік тому +10

    I don't know but the Ukrainians will tell you that the HIMARS is the best rocket system in the world.

    • @patkawesa7046
      @patkawesa7046 Рік тому +2

      This was made before Himars showed the world what its capable of doing

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому +1

      @@patkawesa7046 no difference ones nice to the road and holds less, and the other leaves a bloody mess on tarmac and holds more.... Far as im aware they both fire the same missile, all but in name....

    • @mr.t993
      @mr.t993 Рік тому

      @Roland Carlos
      The two things don't have to contradict each other. The reason the Ukrainians prefer HIMARS is because their doctrine is asymmetric warfare, which means they have much better use of light vehicles that are quick to deploy and quick to hide. Overall the MLRS270 is the more capable System but they dont have the combined arms and logistics to use it in the role it was designed for. The other thing is that Ukrainings are in a way re-inventing modern combat at the moment, so it may very well be that HIMARS will be the future, but it doesnt have to be that way.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому

      @@mr.t993 try telling big headed bigots that...

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому

      Well a (Rolland) aint the best to it at tho mo!!! Is it, in fact bet fukall sent there..

  • @number8485
    @number8485 Рік тому +1

    Fantastic weapon.Has NATO got enough of them?

  • @stephenbrand5661
    @stephenbrand5661 Рік тому +1

    I've only seen ONE video of the M270 operating in Ukraine so far but supposedly the UK and Norway sent a literal handful. Germany was supposed to send their upgraded version too but it seems like Germany needs a solid 4 to 8 months to send anything heavier than a grenade.
    It seems to be like the HIMARS is obviously the best fit for Ukraine right now but the M270 could be great for hitting high value targets closer to the front line since they'd need to be further back for their own safety.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому +1

      What the difference in safety then?? , both fire as far as one another, but tracked version is more armoured and goes more places so go figure... I know what one id rather be sitting in when the rain comes down....

    • @stephenbrand5661
      @stephenbrand5661 Рік тому

      @@wor53lg50 The armor on an M270 can stand up to small arms fire but not much else. It's a lot slower than a HIMARS and it's a tracked vehicle so the maintenance is a lot more involved.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому +1

      @@stephenbrand5661 are we on about the same vehicle here? the british or german made versions will take small arms, frags, IED's aswell, all apart from direct fire artillery strike and the A2 up armoured cab the states copied from them aswell...

    • @patsch9019
      @patsch9019 Рік тому

      Suprise Suprise... they are already in ukraine. Even before you wrote your stupid comment....

    • @stephenbrand5661
      @stephenbrand5661 Рік тому

      @@patsch9019 🤣 I guess you can read English about as well as you can write it!!

  • @Dra741
    @Dra741 Рік тому

    The multiple rocket launch system was part of the Reagan built up and it was effective and improved over period of years and really paid off now, the F-18 I thought you know they said it could do all the stuff but you know I didn't know all the equipment but now that I see this able to complete this mission go and fight its way in and fight its way out everything they promises that's all I want

    • @Walterwaltraud
      @Walterwaltraud Рік тому

      Started in tie 70ies to catch up to the Warsaw pact...

    • @dnate697
      @dnate697 Рік тому +1

      LMMFAO! I was in the Army when they tested this thing in the 70s long before Reagan lied his way into office.

  • @TheBandit7613
    @TheBandit7613 Рік тому +2

    HIMARS is number 1.
    The Russians have no counter and are scared to death of it.
    HIMARS has become the star of the show.

  • @arnoldfuertes3617
    @arnoldfuertes3617 Рік тому

    THE NATOAND US MUST DEVELOP AND EXPAND MORE EFFEVTIVE ROC KETS FOR DEFENSE AND OFFENSES AGAINST AUTHORITARIAN STATES

  • @ringgomuliawarman2457
    @ringgomuliawarman2457 Рік тому +3

    👍

  • @kleantpane8528
    @kleantpane8528 Рік тому

    T300 KASIRGA made in TURKEY

  • @iann.152
    @iann.152 Рік тому

    NATO's deadliest rocket, then why we have Chinese equipment included? Does NATO bought equipment from China?

  • @eduardmihainechif2719
    @eduardmihainechif2719 Рік тому

    if google this again russian are saying it there s

  • @nurullulu2819
    @nurullulu2819 Рік тому

    Inside of s600 pullman guard is nothing happen we can take our coffee without worry about attach from MLRS

  • @user-zd3lw1eu9c
    @user-zd3lw1eu9c 3 місяці тому

    Στην δύση της καλύτερές
    Ρουκέτες η ΗΠΑ και η Γερμανία της κάνει.

  • @Dra741
    @Dra741 Рік тому

    Now the Russians traditionally were the masters of katusha rockets, and they were able to feel them in significant enough numbers to make the Germans have a bit of a Fright with them, but the multiple rocket launch system is incredibly efficient, and it is doing what it said it was going to do that's all I want from a weapon system

  • @jaismohamad1497
    @jaismohamad1497 Рік тому +1

    Bring them on says Putin.

    • @asapanime1875
      @asapanime1875 Рік тому

      While whispering nervously " not really please no "

    • @spotlight9864
      @spotlight9864  Рік тому

      Right

    • @jaismohamad1497
      @jaismohamad1497 Рік тому

      @@asapanime1875 same thing will happen like the game changers the US had sent. Russia is not like Iraq or Afghanistan.

    • @omaconomacon4660
      @omaconomacon4660 Рік тому

      @@jaismohamad1497 Is that why they failed miserably to take the Ukrainian capital?

    • @jaismohamad1497
      @jaismohamad1497 Рік тому +1

      @@omaconomacon4660 I was told the Russians did not intend to take Kyiv. It was only to divert attention to their real target which is the liberation of eastern Ukraine.
      I have friends in the army intelligence. That's what they told me.

  • @scottbattaglia8595
    @scottbattaglia8595 Рік тому

    How is the himars at number 10 but our 1980s version that's not as good the m270 is #1 this channel is a pathetic joke, seriously an m270 will not win against a himars, accuracy is most important, the m270 is ok but himars is amazing.....so just curious how literally what the himars replaced was the m270 and you think the m270 is a 9 places better than the himars......yea makes tons of sense

    • @scottbattaglia8595
      @scottbattaglia8595 Рік тому

      And if you don't understand "high Mobility" is key with modern radar, the enemy can see your rocket artillery launch and pinpoint where and literally if quick enough sending guided artillery right to those rockets origin point, so the capability to stop shoot and be back on the move is what's key, and the m270 ranked #1 is a joke when you rank himars 10th.....

  • @neilbertescalante697
    @neilbertescalante697 Рік тому

    Chinese chicken rockets all equipment copy right and low quality 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @jackreacher189
    @jackreacher189 Рік тому

    The Russian army and fighters of the Donetsk Republic entered Bakhmut from the north
    The allies are approaching from the north. This is a sign that in a few days the "assault" on that important city in the south of the Donbas front will begin
    WITH EACH new day, the seams and other fortified Ukrainian lines on the Donbas front are bursting more and more.
    The Russian army and DNR fighters entered Bakhmut from the north as well.
    They also entered Zaitsevo, which is located southeast of Bahmut, and Kodem.
    They attack Opitnoe, Vodjanoe and Pervomajskoe, whose fall will also lead to the fall of Avdejevka.
    They already control a third of Opitno.
    The allies are approaching from the north. This is a sign that in a few days the "assault" on that important city in the south of the Donbas front will begin.
    They penetrate around Kharkiv and from Izjum to Chuguevo.
    They also took Aleksandrovka between Kherson and Nikolaev areas. With good prospects for further advancement towards Nikolaev.
    The Ukris, by the way, still have huge losses.
    In Soledar, which is about to fall, more than a third of the soldiers of the Ukrainian 10th Mountain Assault Brigade left voluntarily.
    That brigade was already cut in half without that.
    More than half of the members of the 3rd Battalion of the Ukrainian 66th Mechanized Brigade deserted near Maryinka.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 Рік тому

      Stay in basement and you vote right and most importantly is how you feel inside, this gonna be ya future!! Maybe thell get along after ridding the rough from chaf....

    • @jackreacher189
      @jackreacher189 Рік тому

      @@wor53lg50 just be Kool, stop by the bank and inform about your obligations.... buy a Coke.,and burger, fast your sitbelt and wait for crash landing...
      ...don't forget to call your friends from minority society/lgbtqwerttu groups/ and say them SO LONG, ... cause no more petro dolars and cheap credit...

  • @CrispyBakedPotato
    @CrispyBakedPotato Рік тому

    I think we all know by now that Russian equipment is overrated. Your number 2 pick is probably garbage

  • @jackreacher189
    @jackreacher189 Рік тому

    sorry I'm little bit late...vacation
    The UKRAINIAN army has been attacking Krasni Liman, an important city in the north of DPR, for days now, and it is not succeeding at all.
    He doesn't even manage to capture Kupyansk and break through to Svatov. With the ambition to attack Liman from behind - from the north and northwest.
    Reinforcements are coming to the Russian units holding those parts of the front, so the Ukrainian raids on those parts of the "Kharkov front", to put it mildly, will not be successful in the coming days either.
    At best, the Ukrainian forces attacking Liman and trying to break through to Swat can suffer a serious defeat because they have spread over too much territory.
    Such that it will nullify everything, or almost everything, that the Ukris achieved on the "Kharkov front".
    With this development of operations, the Kiev junta will probably be left without even the last chance to reverse the situation on the fronts. Not only because Russia is rapidly mobilizing 300,000 reservists.
    The special military operation (SVO) will become anti-terrorist after the end of the referendum and the entry of the DNR, LNR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions into Russia, Crimean President Sergei Aksyonov said.
    According to him, the moment when the liberated territories get a new status, becoming part of Russia, will be the point of no return.
    "In fact, we will no longer carry out a special, but counter-terrorist operation on our territories." We have fought for our people so far. Now we will fight for our country," stressed Aksyonov.
    The result of the held referendums - he further specified - will be: clarity of perspective and greater security for the people in the territories that become part of Russia.
    The well-known Moscow military expert Alexey Leonkov estimated that partial mobilization was necessary because of faster and more significant changes on the fronts and because Russia included up to 200,000 soldiers in the SVO, which was enough to (on average) control one soldier with only one company. kilometer front.
    Leonkov announces a change in the tactics of military operations in Ukraine.
    He calls it a "mobile front", according to the principle: one battalion broke through and occupied some positions, that battalion holds them, and the next battalion breaks through further...