What the F
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- My puzzle shop - puzzleguystore.etsy.com
Download free solutions for puzzles here
www.puzzlemast...
Please subscribe goo.gl/k4jHYm to my channel so you do not miss anything.
INSTAGRAM - / the_puzzle_guy
Music for you videos here - www.epidemicso...
What the F is available in my puzzle shop - puzzleguystore.etsy.com
Active link in my profile
Thanks 👍
@@piktureitwhy is it named that... 😞?
@@lasticflace1416bro have you even watched the video?
I made this with paper.
Ordered! 😄
This is the Infinite Chocolate glitch
That’s exactly what I was thinking
@erd4877
It's not infinite the chocolate loses a inch same as that 4 fronts but 3 backs
People who knew: all
People who asked: 0@@MiguelSales-ek8fw
@@MiguelSales-ek8fw🤓👆
@@MiguelSales-ek8fwyeah we know it’s not actually infinite but it’s just called the infinite chocolate trick or whatever
2023: infinite chocolate glitch
2024: infinite F glitch
The chocolate glitch is WAY older than 2023
Nice
Flip the whole square, all at once.
it wont be spelled right
genius
@@user-hn3wm2fc5bIt wont be spelled right
@@YourLocalPoobtoo bad
@@WD35 it wont be spelled right
I remember this from the old "infinite chocolate bar" thing. Basically when you're rearranging the pieces there is enough subtracted area to create that squares worth of area.
My dad saw the original and legit broke out a pen and calculator to figure it out.
Sounds like a me thing to do
legend dad
FYI in the video they'd add a little bit more chocolate at the slice.
unless he did it based on irl measurements the dad is wrong, multiple people have shown that the video added on chocolate just really smoothly, it doesn't work too too well irl
did he figure it out?
"Hey bro, what puzzle you wanna play?"
"What the f."
"Jeez, okay. I was just asking..."
💀💀💀👍
The back shape is a teeny tiny bit shorter on one side
Front has 4 back has 3, much more simple
@@ihyaakmal5995it is shorter because it lost the "f" area
@@ihyaakmal5995bro it is smaller
@@ihyaakmal5995that was a lot of yapping just to say "yeah" at the end
@@TabbyVee 😑.. Not really. That time I thought what @miku meant is short in the individual parts.. And what I meant in my comment is short in the overall puzzle.
You know what. Fine. I'll get rid of my yaps to not burn your eyes.
Ahh. I see. He's not reversing the puzzle, her's simply flipping over each piece
Yes, and there's a very narrow triangle-shaped hole between the top black pieces that has the same area as the "F" square.
Withought audio I thought this was a vsauce short.
Sounds complimentary 😎
But what does "front" weigh?
i thought it was vsauce too lol
We found vsauce4
@Qermaq *Vsauce music intensifies* Well the word, front doesn't weigh...well anything. It is a spoken word, not a physical thing you can pick up and feel the weight of. However... (he continues for 30 mins).
“What the f### is this called”
“Yes”
The piece that was on the right side did not go to the left side, so it removes a portion along the bottom that equals to the portion of the extra piece.
Actually it has to do with the slope of the "triangle" up top (it actually isn't a triangle, the slope very very slightly changes along it) and the slopes of the angled edges of the two pieces right under it. It results that in one configuration, it fits snuggly so the extra square is needed, but in the other configuration, it leaves a tiny sliver that has the area of 1 square. You can actually see the sliver when he flips it. It looks like he just isn't pushing the pieces together enough but it is a gap that you cannot get rid of.
@@Thagrynoryou’re talking about the chocolate bar thing, this trick is much simpler, the pieces were juts rearranged into a different rectangle with a smaller length
@@Non-binaryCupno your wrong, the word "back" is bigger than the word "front" so you need a smaller square to connect them all
Exactly but you will easily confuse people 😂
When flipped the pieces should also swap sides, but they instead stay in their original location.
The starting piece on the left should have its shorter side in the center, but when flipped and left on the left side of the screen its short side ends up on the outside of the square.
The larger vertical blocks are swapped in their place creating the space for the rectangular piece leaving the small square ‘f’ piece.
Yeah yeah thank you
F on one side but other side is ?????? Who the f knows so would like to see if its an f in the same format as back is or just blank
The reason why that piece doesn't fit when you flip it is because the pieces that are irregular-pentagons are not swapped and rearranged when you 'flip it' so the whole shape doesn't actually flip.
It’s the same trick as that chocolate thing.
Basically just an optical illusion that makes you think it’s the same size, when actually it’s slightly smaller on the second one.
No the chocolate thing after the width and height is the same, this one obviously after it is a bit shorter.
@@haomingjin1617the infinite chocolate image uses the same optical illusion, but also sneaks in extra chocolate to make it loop. If you were to look at the original image as a wireframe instead of the chocolate chunks tiles, you would find that the final size is shorter but then 'grows' to finish the loop.
the same thing is happening here. the use of FRONT and BACK is to get the viewer to only look at the words lining up and not where the missing chunk would fit
@@haomingjin1617the smaller the extra piece, the harder to see the difference
@@Solinaru OK. I think perhaps we are not talking about the same thing/video to begin with.
Press f to pay respect
I don't have the F...
f
I unortunately seem to be lacking this lipping letter ! I wish my ree temu keyboard came with it!
F
whats on the back of the extra piece
Fr that's what I wanna know
You'd go mad from the revelation.
@@TheZetaKai🤓
What's on the back is irrelevant. Could be anything, it doesn't matter.
Oh.............
So basically this is a paradox that is considered a math prank. This trick works exactly like the "infinite" chocolate trend. So basically the area of the back is still equal to the front, but there is a slim missing area that is equivalent to the area of the very small square. In small terms bro just went "GET PRANKED!"
the infinite chocolate bar all over again
look closer
could've chosen a font size where the letter F fits perfectly in that little square
4 rows of FRONT converted to 3 rows of BACK 😂… so what the F
Bigger font less letters
You says what the freak not f
@@D2DMackenzie 😜
The letters in the "back" appear to be sparser.
The top right angle triangle has its most acute angle aligned with the topmost vertex of the large trapezoid. When the shape is flipped this does not happen so the pieces are assembled in a different way making a different square. I love it.
WHY DID YOU LIKE UR COMMENT KIDDO
@@A_fan_of_dj_cook are you yelling at me?
kinda wanna see this animated as a screen saver
pov: you don’t leave enough room for wonder
Simple Explanation: It's Size Just Gets Smaller
Compare the length of the left side of the large trapezoid containing the three F's plus one side of the small square to the length of the right side of the trapezoid plus the height of the long thin triangle above. The latter is slightly shorter, which should result in an extra square. (Assuming they were made from 5x5 graph paper, the ratio of lengths is 5:4.8.)
This is exactly the same "infinite chocolate" trick, except you turned the final pieces their back to the front lmao.
For those who don't see the difference.
Ignore the top triangle.
Two big pieces below it. One is two units wide, the other is 3 units wide. At bottom below 3 units wide is two pieces, a 1x1 and a 2x1.
After flipping, wide piece is still to the left but has moved down as triangle on top is flipped, and narrow piece is still at right but has moved up, leaving space only for 2x1 bottom piece.
The height of complete puzzle has shrunk by 1/5 of a piece.
If you would flip complete puzzle, there would be no extra piece, but text would be garbled. 'Back' is only readable as you geometrical rearrange the pieces.
To get the original that fits all pieces: Top triangle needs to slide down, so its left side overhangs the piece below. The right piece goes to the left, fits under that overhang. The 2 small pieces stay in the same position.
Simple, every piece is flipping in IT'S axis, instead of the axis of the entire shape, which makes the larger sloped rectangle artificially lower than the smaller one, meaning the small normal rectangle is the only shape that can fit in the small gap created. If you flip the entire shape instead of just every piece, you get the entire backside, likely a little messed up because it's not meant to work
🧑 mom can we have Vsauce.
👩 no son we have Vsauce at home.
🏠 Vsauce at home:
"What the F" 😂😂😂
There is a gap lines in back and not in front
Not this time
It says 4 fronts but only 3 backs.
What is happening is as they turn around the peices, they never flip it to the other side of the square, meaning that the left peice is still on the left, this results in the dimensions changing to become smaller.
However a way to break the puzzle is to turn all peices at once so that the parts on the rights gets flipped to the left and vice versa.
Him:What The F
Me:WHAT THE FUCK💀💀💀
For the front, there are 4 rows. When he flipped it around there was 3 rows, he flipped the portions around so there was one extra piece left.
WE ARE REWINDING INFINITE CHOCOLATE WITH DIS ONE🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
If you look closely, the letters don't align perfectly and the angles between the pieces when flipped are actually not straight. If you draw an outline of the square when on it's front, then flip and rearrange the pieces inside the outline, you'll notice it's not perfectly within it. The extra space in the outline that isn't covered will be exactly the area of the leftover square
Infinite chocolate trick: "who are you"?
The puzzle: " I am you"!
This is a beautiful puzzle: it’s geometrically accurate, no fake “not straight lines” as in the chocolate puzzle. The trick is that neither square is actually a square, they both have the same width, but ever so slightly different heights. Very clever!
“Peter what are you doing?”
“Creating infinite chocolate”
“WHAT THE F-“
really easy to see the trick once the video loops, clearly able to see that the back square is just smaller in total compared to the front square which is why that small square can be deducted
Refutation: ate before there were 5 long inscriptions, but after there are 4 short ones
“Hey daughter,what’s your fav puzzle?”
“What the f”
“DONT DARE YOU CUSS IN FRONT OF ME”
Press F to break the glitch.
😂 like what the ffffff I'm not saying that word
The bigger piece is on the longer side of the "triangle" on the front part, and when he flip it, that same piece is now on the smaller side of the "triangle" making the puzzle now smaller and thus making that small piece be left out
(If he keeped the big piece in the long part, it would not have left over pieces)
The front side is actually rectangular, but only just barely. When you flip the parts around, the shape you end up with is a square, and the disparity between the areas is enough to account for the missing piece.
This also applies to the infamous "Infinite Chocolate Glitch"
Remember kids, magic may not be real, but the laws of physics are
its a lot harder to give an f when everyone shows you their back but this guy was able to
Jokes on you, just flip it with a spatula
i think i see what's going on. When you flip the larger piece over, your also having to lower it such that it would end up using the space where the two smaller pieces are. And because of the different amount of space each piece is your raising the piece on the right creating that space for the rectangular small piece and because of the angle the top piece has it causes the two larger pieces to align.
Rearrange and you have room for wonder
Yep, the trick has to do with angles. The angle change from one to the other is not that noticeable, but it's enough to remove the area from the small piece.
“What the F” 🤬
“What the Front” 😊
Unlike the chocolate puzzle, this illusion kind of falls short (to me), because front and back are so different that it feels completely logical that a piece is missing. The back only has 3 lines and the font there is bigger. The front had 4 lines and were slightly smaller. If the puzzle had been flipped in its entirety, the flipped puzzle would have a piece out of place, hence why the illusion isn't as strong.
Front is 5 letters. Back is 4. It's a smaller shape. Clever puzzle, well made.
(just in case you don't understand the puzzle, the square slightly shrinks in size when on the back)
If I were designing it, I would make the front 4.95cm wide by 5.05cm long. This gives an area of 24.9975cm^2. When rearranged, the new dimensions would be 4.95cm wide by 4.85cm long, for an area of 24.0075cm^2. Very hard to detect a millimeter difference between length and width.
Let's say you start with a 5x5 square. You could make this with a triangle of base 5 and height 2, a trapezoid with bases of 4 and 2.8 with a height of 3, a trapezoid with bases 3.8 and 3 with a height of 2, a rectangle of 2x1 and a square 1x1. Your original dimensions are 5x5, but your final dimensions are 5x4.8. With perfect manufacturing, there would be no gaps, but your final "square" is actually a rectangle with an area of 24 instead of 25.
I would flip the whole puzzle so that no piece is left to suffer ETERNAL NOTHINGNESS😂
I cannot stop laughing so funny
Você colocou uma ótima excelente transição neste corte viu 😉
One must imagine sisyphus happy
That's because of the first two pieces that were flipped. It forces that edge piece to move up on the right to move up, and causes that small rectangular piece to also move so that it can look like a square. Because of all that, there's not any space for the tiny square piece.
It's because back is one letter less than front so the right side is one letter less witch makes a extra piece
katy perry when she divides in 7 equivalent pieces to form infinite katy perry pieces: the resurrection of f
This is definitely my favorite twist on the missing square illusion.
The wonders of modern video editing. Makes my head spin
4:FRONT
3:BACK
😂
What the F***! 🤣 It's actually cool
Thats cool it went from 4/5 to 4/4 .... magic
Ahhh that is genius! The last square being an F….. I feel the need to own this
Is the same on both sides? The reason why it’s because the printing on the white side where it says front is smaller print and went and then on the back on the black side or the white where it says back it’s larger print and that’s what you get the illusion and you take away one of the F the letter that’s what you get but if you flipped it all over, you would see the same thing That the illusion smaller print has more letters on the front like print it like four times or like 3×4 times smaller print and back printed only three times on the backside and that’s what the illusion of it……………………………………………..
The “back” square is smaller, but so little material has been removed that it’s barely noticeable
hah, ya think ya try to trick me with the classic chocolate bar trick didnt ya
You flipped the top piece in a different way.
Glad I wasn't the only person who immediately thought of the Russian guy with the chocolate
This is why it took us so long to discover calculus
brain.exe refuses to start.
"BACK, BACK, BACK, F*CK" 💀
My brain is not braining
“What the Fu-“ when I saw the title
The best name for this thing😂
That extra piece wasn't lying, That's quite an F to take.
Funny little take on the chocolate bar
Flip the last peace. I need to see the back. If it doesn’t say “What The”, I’m gonna be so disappointed
Lmao bro it's just like u have 5 words and u making them 4 with and extra word😂😂😂
My favourite optical illusion. Had a guy perform this with a chocolate bar in front of me. What he didn't know was that I had the same chocolate bar and placed mine next to his after he was done and the difference is noticeable.
it’s like that chocolate trick to have infinite chocolate lmao
Ah yes, the good old “infinite chocolate bar” trick
Money should have leftovers too😅
F: Whats about me?
It's like the short that says that there is just enough room for wonder, if you shift the peaces.
The back is slightly shorter, which makes space for the missing F, it just isn't noticed in the movement of the piecesn
[Laughs in tumblr veteran]
Infinite Chocolate Bar be like:
Oh look, "Front, Front, Front, Front"
"Back, Back, Back, Back, r"
"Erm... what the F?" - Sqwig Lord
The trick is that the larger and smaller trapezium are swapped when flipped over
Doesn't it work because the thicker slanted piece and the thinner slanted piece are swapped from thick at the tip (of the triangle) and thin at the bottom to thick at the bottom and thin at the tip?
What’s missing in this presentation is the (false) assertion that the square is the same size when flipped over. Figuring out how the size is conserved (it’s not) is kind of the whole puzzle.