Mohammed Hijab | Arrogance in Dawah and Debates | Blood Brothers #2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- In this episode of the Blood Brothers podcast, Dilly and Aki Hussain catch up with UA-camr, apologist and Speakers' Corner debater Mohammed Hijab. #BloodBrothersPodcast #MohammedHijab #SpeakersCorner
Topic of discussions include debating tactics, dawah and dramas at Speakers' Corner, sectarianism within a strand of the Salafi movement, Shaykh Ibn Taymiyya, and Hijab's new book, 'Kalam Cosmological Arguments'.
** SEARCH ‘BLOOD BROTHERS’ ON ALL DIGITAL PLATFORMS **
FOLLOW 5PILLARS ON:
UA-cam: / 5pillars
Facebook: / 5pillarsuk
Instagram: / 5pillarsnews
Twitter: / 5pillarsuk
Telegram: t.me/s/news5Pi...
TikTok: / 5pillarsnews
Website: 5pillarsuk.com/
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes,
Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars UA-cam channel!
Jazakallah khayran.
Wa alaykom as salam wa rahmatullah.
Why do you guys play the British national anthem at the start of your videos? Really shouldn't be doin that, its not from the deen unless there's something I'm misunderstanding
@@k1003944 It's for irony and sarcasm - hence the footage of wars, invasions and bombings.
May Allah make 5pillars and the podcast super popular!
Honesty Холис банда ameen
Ameen ya Rabb!
@@5Pillars . Najdi movement?? I think u need to go back and reaserch where Najad actually is! Some serious allegations against a man known as a reformer of the deen! And protesting in Syria was wrong as its not from the sunnah and look what happend!
allah accepted it seems
Ameen
Been following Mohammed for 5 years easy. I hope he doesn't give up Speakers corner yet. It's a place to sharpen your intellectual sword and I enjoy watching him speak and debate. May Allah(swt) protect him.
Sicarii thats obviously a lie since he was but a child 5 years ago.
@@voteukip658 his channel has been around longer then 5 yrs. A child? Hes married with children. I swear people love to speak when they know nothing.
***Important Parts***
1. O min to 12 min:
Why debate, and does it bring any benefit to the Ummah?
2. 12 min to 29 min:
The roots of the Madkhali movement, and whether the Madkhali movement reinterprets the teachings of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab (r).
3. 29 min to 39 min:
Teaching confidence in our tradition (usool), and Walaa & Baraa.
4. 39 min to End:
What is the Kamal Cosmological Argument? Was Ibn Taymiyyah Anti-Kalam? And why our Du'aa must study & refute Liberalism today.
Who is dhuro saniya
Jazakallah khayran for the breakdown!
Deen Canada you forgot 20.35 for the Ryu kick.
That's very important!
@@AhmedRaza-lh4oj lol!
Brother Mohammed Hijab got me here alhamdulillah.
Alhamdulillah :)
Mohammed Hijab is so humble. Indeed there’s no need to distance yourself once u’ve gained more knowledge. We do need people with more knowledge in that corner ! Keep up the good work Hijab 🙏🏼🙏🏼
“Stupid arguments by angry white people”
That comment really annoyed me. Does he not think there are white Muslims?
Why is it knowledgable people speak about ‘white people’ like there are no white Muslims. Why don’t they say non Muslims.
@@Abuhan47 are you a revert bro....
@@Abuhan47 oh great to hear that. Btw who are your favourite islamic speakers
@@Abuhan47 Yes bro I am a born muslim. Actually, I also like these speakers lol. U can also listen to Tim humble, zakir naik etc
In philosophy white person is referred to peiple believing in western values like liberalism etc. White skin color people are all over east europe ,north africa and asia so he isn't referring to just people with white skin
@@clearlyclearorExactly 💯
May Allah Bless 5Pillars for its Great efforts
Ameen ya Rabb. Please share, comment and subscribe! Jazakallah khayran.
i found Islam through speakers corner videos, and accepted it very shortly after
The introduction was BRILLIANT 😂👍
Salafiyah isnt owned by spubs or abu khadeeja.....Our brother hijab is doing a great job in showing a clearer image of islam and salafiyah.
May allah reward you
Bring me the mistakes of Abu Khadījah and Co in regards to their Aqīdah (creed) and Manhaj (methodology) and how they have opposed the earlier Salaf. ..... I shall be waiting.
If you can not do so they know my friend you a liar and an ignorant blind following sheep.
@@Brazybellz201 Brother the fitna they have created is well known...doing takfeer and calling everyone mubtadi....how can this be our deen....he hasnt spared anyone from his "PDF FATWAS"....
@@mohammadshadaanshah5766 "doing Takfeer" Are you making him out to be a Khaarijee now?! Fear Allaah!
Correction: Showing a clearer image of Ikhwaaniyyah, not Salafiyyah.
hhhhhh salafiya , then you dont know salafiya then
Hijab wiped the floor with that kazzab wood.
Wallah underrated podcast, you guys are quality man
This was a very benefitual interview and if br.hijab continued talking hours I wouldn't be bored.. Because I have a big question mark on every topic you raised
Jazakom Allah kheiran kathera
And happy Eid for everyone
SPUBs has no claim over the name or title “Salafi” despite what they may say ...
Bring me the mistakes of Abu Khadījah and Co in regards to their Aqīdah (creed) and Manhaj (methodology) and how they have opposed the earlier Salaf. ..... I shall be waiting.
If you can not do so they know my friend you a liar and an ignorant blind following sheep.
@@Brazybellz201 they fail to do kufr bit taghoot,they dont have wala wal bara,those who fall in kufr and shirk they dont they such people are kafir,
@@Brazybellz201 for eg they day voting is shirk but if the person votes they will not declare him to be a kaffir,so they fail to bring action into eman,they say if you disapprove it by mouth and hate it by heart its kkay if your action contradicts that
HamzaAsSalafi HamzaAsSalafi
Hahahaha - you are saying they have no mistakes in aqeedah or manhaj? What are they? Infallible?
Anyway - My post says they have no claim over this title. They try to claim ownership over it as if they can decide who is upon the Sunnah and who is not. If you say they do have a claim over it, it’s for you to prove it.
HamzaAsSalafi HamzaAsSalafi
Plus they (being Abu Khadeeja and co) have no authority to say who is upon the Sunnah or not. Abu Khadeeja has no discernible qualifications in this regard.
Who would believe that Brother Hijab would challenge Jedi for the Ring And all the Belts in less than a month later 😂
Don’t just watch. Hit the like and let our brothers flourish in these UA-cam streets👍🏽.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
01:18 🎙️ *Mohammed Hijab values engaging in Speakers' Corner as a natural way of conveying knowledge and humbling oneself in the process.*
03:39 📚 *While some have moved away from Speakers' Corner due to its unpredictable and sometimes chaotic nature, Mohammed Hijab sees it as a valuable platform for dawah and knowledge sharing.*
05:32 🌍 *Mohammed Hijab expresses his commitment to continue going to Speakers' Corner, emphasizing the importance of natural interactions in conveying Islamic teachings.*
08:04 🎭 *Mohammed Hijab uses Speakers' Corner as a teaching platform, presenting lesson plans in his interactions to educate the audience about Islam and engage with different ideas.*
11:56 🔄 *Mohammed Hijab acknowledges the changing dynamics at Speakers' Corner, welcoming representation from various backgrounds but emphasizes the need for unity in dawah and avoiding unnecessary sectarian obstacles.*
17:49 🤝 *Mohammed Hijab criticizes divisive attitudes within some groups at Speakers' Corner, highlighting the importance of navigating differences for the greater benefit of dawah and the Muslim community.*
29:21 🌐 *Mohammed Hijab believes in the need for both debating theoretical philosophical ideas and addressing practical issues like the impact of Enlightenment philosophies and European colonialism.*
30:43 🤝 *Emphasizes the importance of reinstalling confidence in the Islamic tradition, challenging atheist ideas, and demonstrating the intellectual foundation behind combating ideologies that led to colonization.*
33:25 🥊 *Mohammed Hijab strategically adopts an assertive and confrontational approach when debating individuals who mock Islam or show derogatory rhetoric, aiming to give a strong response to protect the faith.*
35:19 🎙️ *Mohammed Hijab justifies his assertive style, drawing on historical and religious precedence, framing it as a strategic and justified response to those involved in knowledge production leading to harm against Muslims.*
38:50 🌐 *Mohammed Hijab discusses having different personas and experiences in various environments, including Speakers' Corner, UA-cam culture, and professional settings.*
40:01 📚 *Mohammed Hijab expresses his preference for staying connected with people and engaging in face-to-face interactions rather than adopting an aloof academic approach.*
40:30 🎓 *Mohammed Hijab shares his academic journey, including completing a bachelor's in philosophy, a master's in history, and another master's in Islamic studies. He discusses changing his Ph.D. focus to compare liberal contractualism and traditional Islam.*
41:51 🌍 *Mohammed Hijab explains his Ph.D. research, comparing liberal contractualism and traditional Islam using case studies on modules such as jihad, women's rights, and the concept of God.*
42:59 🧠 *Mohammed Hijab emphasizes the importance of using a post-colonial lens in his research, utilizing concepts like Orientalism and post-colonial theory for analysis.*
43:27 📖 *Mohammed Hijab briefly discusses his book, "Kalam Cosmological Arguments," focusing on the diversity of arguments within Kalam rather than a single approach, inspired by figures like Avicenna, Ghazali, and Ibn Taymiyyah.*
45:31 🤔 *Mohammed Hijab addresses the misconception that Ibn Taymiyyah was entirely against Kalam, explaining that Ibn Taymiyyah acknowledged and engaged with various philosophical arguments, contributing to Islamic intellectual heritage.*
49:26 📚 *Mohammed Hijab praises Ibn Taymiyyah as an intellectual giant, highlighting the importance of engaging with diverse ideas and being open-minded in addressing contemporary challenges like liberalism and feminism.*
55:41 📘 *Mohammed Hijab discusses his book's success in the atheist section on Amazon, emphasizing the need for Muslims to actively participate in intellectual discourse and contribute to various fields.*
57:22 🙌 *Mohammed Hijab acknowledges the valuable contributions of scholars like Hamza Tzortzis and Ijaz Ahmad, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and learning from fellow researchers and teachers in the field.*
Made with HARPA AI
I love the interview guys but please don't talk over theguest, its so difficult ti hear!!
Assalamu Alykom,
I thought I was going to listen to 20 minutes. Man I was wrong.
Jazzaka Allahu Khyran for this podcast.
May Allah SubhanaAllah wataala aid and bless you on this amazing channel. Just subscribed.
Jazakallah khayran. Ameen to your dua!
Great podcast 👌👌 Hamza tzortis next in the podcast is something I’m looking forward for
Rather not see brother hamza, saw him a Birmingham a few years back and he was very good woo the crowd and brushed me off several times when i attenpted to speak with him. Brother need to humble himself before i give him the time of day. Despite his charactor, MashaAllah, brother hamza has good arguments.
Episode 9 with Hamza Tzortzis will be released on 20/08/19 insha'Allah!
Wow so much insight! Jzk x
Barakallahu feek!
dudes abit rude...the dilly hussain one. his brother is cool.
اَمِين يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِيْن
Very good podcast may Allah bless you guys
Ameen ya Rabb
This channel needs to become more popular Inshallah
Thoroughly Enjoyed the Discussion. It was fun.
Can you imagine if the government banned speakers corner?
People will find/establish a platform elsewhere, most likely.
🇷🇺☦🤝☪️I will use the same strategy Hijab uses when I get to speakers corner. I will be the Hijab of Christians. Unlike the Protestant pagans Hijab debates against, I can dismantle all of Hijab's arguments against our faith
Great discussion!
Barakallahu feek!
"Refuting these stupid arguments by angry white people" - *DEAD 💀⚰️😂💀⚰️*
I going to say the Shia only came to the corner in they own words is to counter the takfir and name calling spreading myths about them , all most all people by now know the Shia beliefs especially the mainstream and fringe beliefs
Finally a decent podcast from the UK
Jazakallah khayran!
ONE SIMPEL QUESTION FOR ALL THE MUSLIM WHAT IS YOUR PROOF FOR ETERNAL LIFE.
This is in reference to Shamsi who is a Jami Madkhali they are considered murjiah
First Group: The Jami or Madkhali Group الإتجاة الجامي المدخلي :
The leaders and founders of this group are:
Mohammad Aman Jami محمد أمان الجامي of Ethiopia and
Rabie Al-Madkhali ربيع المدخلي of Yemen [13]: they both got all or part of their education in Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Albana محمد البنا of Egypt.
Ali Alhalabi على الحلبي of Jordan.
They are also represented in Canada by the so called “Quran and Sunnah Society (QSS)” [14]. The core of their principles is to:
Consider Iman as only the Aqeeda in the heart, and that actions are a complimentary condition to Iman شرط كمال. The falling of this is to consider that ruling with secular laws by a government is permissible as they consider it an action rather than Aqeeda. They perceive the existing ruling systems in the Muslim lands as legitimate and must be obeyed. They went out of their way to legitimize the existing ruling systems and make the rulers of the secular governments legitimate Walis[15] (rulers) and show that they are as good as the Salaf rulers, especially the Saudi system.
They say that being in power is the source of legitimacy by itself. They also consider that those who oppose these governments are "Khawarij". They gave a Fatwa that it is Wajib "obligatory" to report to the authorities the people of Dawa that do not follow their principles as they are Khawarij! They have categorized almost all the Du'aat (people of Dawa or calling for the path of Allah SWT) and bashed them as ignorant or people of Bida'a or Kuffar! They have many websites that are dedicated to bashing Du'aat! They legitimize their spying actions as performing what they see as the "Science of Criticism" or what is known in the Islamic sciences as "Elm Aljarh and Ta'deel"! Of course, this group has no reservations on accepting democracy as a framework; as they do not interfere in the political process whatsoever in accordance with their principles. In terms of Ijtihad and Taqleed, they adopt the same approach as Ahlul Sunnah where only scholars are allowed to give Fatwas. However, scholars are only those who agree with their point of view! It is ironic and of great sorrow as well, that although this group of the Salafi spectrum attacks and refutes the Aqeeda and methodology of Sufism, as all other Salafi groups, they have an important feature in common with the Sufis; that is the way they raise their followers: “the blind-minded follower scheme”. Sufis, as well as Salafis of this group, teach their followers to completely lock up their minds and follow the directions, opinions and sayings of their specific ‘Shaikhs” religiously as if they are unannounced prophets. Sufis, teach their followers that to follow a shaikh is to follow Allah SWTand His messenger PBUH in whatever the Shaikh says. They provide evidences that are completely false and misused. This group of Salafis teaches the same attitude through different evidence. Although their evidence is true in general, it is, again, taken out its context and used in an overly subordinating fashion. The place of mind and self thinking and intellect has completely diminished from the followers of these two groups: the Sufis and group one of the Salafis. They both failed to recognize that although, contrary to the Mu’tazilah, Ahlul Sunnah Wal-Jama'a emphasise the need for the common person to ask those who have the knowledge, they did not completely destroy the capacity of the common person to respond to the simplest events of life that surround him/her. The reason for such tactic by G1 Salafis is obvious: the evidence and the interpretation of Quran and Sunnah as well as the outcome of such interpretation can not stand the scrutiny of the youth if they are allowed to think and question the Shaiks. This is contrary to Ahlul Sunnah who teach their followers to always ask for the proof of what they claim as Sunnah and not to be scared of hearing the opposing opinions and to always come back with questions if not convinced. The result of such tactics is devastating; a generation that are although have the outside of good humble and obedient Muslims, that is crippled almost totally and completely dependent on few names scattered over some Middle Eastern countries to tell them what to think of Bush or how to perceive a tyrant that kills Muslim Du’aat and force his society to rule with a parallel Shariah of his own! This is what is most dangerous about such groups of Sufis and G1 Salafis. This point will be further explained in Part 2 of this research.
They made a goal of their life to throw the accusation of Kufr on a particular great Da'iyah (singular of Du'aat): Sayed Qutb. They all wrote volumes in his Kufr! And they completely discarded his Tafseer "In the Shade of the Quran" as a book of misguidance!
This stand against Sayed Qutb is actually against their official view of not making Takfeer (applying Kufr) to anyone! Of course they have no place for Jihad in their version of Islam.
This group is perceived by all other groups as pure Murji'ah[16]. They hold the worst ideas and they do not hesitate on snitching on fellow Muslims to the authorities, under a claim that such people (who call for following the Quran and Sunnah as the constitution and as basis for public life) are hazards to the general public and must be eliminated! The followers of this group are spread in the Muslim motherland and in the West as well. They fool the common Muslim by claiming to be Ahlul Sunnah and act as if their stand is the pure truth! However, although they were able to fool many common Muslims and some reverts to Islam from the West, they are almost rejected everywhere else.
They can be perceived as the "flip flop group"! Aside from being wrong in interpretation of the evidence, they hold no consistency in their methodology (Manhaj). They are "Murji'ah" when it come to rulers and governments, and they are "Khawarij" when it comes to other Du'aat! In the final analysis of their stand, they fit the criteria of the Hadith of Khawarij. They call for Takfeer of Du'aat (which are the people of Islam in the Hadith) and they call for peace and obedience to the rulers who embrace the secular systems![17]
How old is Brother Hijab?
Usman Barak Think 29/30
@Rokib Miah Damn I would have guessed like late 20s maybe early 30s. He looks more mature than his age mashAllah. Also the man has 3 kids, which is really impressive.
It's about time we've had salafi leaning folk acknowledge ibn 'Abd al-Wahhabs egregious errors which have contributed towards millions of people's blood being shed from his own time to the present day.
Shut up you shiiitii dog!! majosis has no rights, a dog is better than a shiiti.
@@fguledh I'm not shi'i, but okay.....
Hijab himself acknowledged the magnum opus of Najdi movement ‘Durur al-Saniyya’ has plethora of takfir against Ottomans and others.
Stupid statement, its not Muhammed ibn Abdul Wahab rahimullah fault people mis-interpret his words.
@@MrRK0121 read the books of historians of najd such as ibn bishr and ghunayman.
Many salafi-esque scholars are acknowledging the barbarity of the movement I.e. hatim al awni and even those such as adel kalbani
@@Waqarali-rs1mc there is bias everywhere. If you have a problem with the works of Muhammed ibn Abdul wahab rahimullah it is simple, find out what you disagree with and discuss it. Everywhere has barbaric people some people are barabaric some are not. What movement are you referring to?
Shout out Mo Hijab! Good lad mA! But podcast hosts the delivery of the questions is absolutely appalling. "Don't you think this xyz doesn't work because xyz?" Come on guys stop giving loaded questions and directing an answer with the question. Just ask the question guys. Come on. Let the podcast guest speak on their own merit.
These hosts really oversimplify the whole Najdi issue due to ignorance and so do most Madkhalis.
Their history should be divided into 3 eras, 1st the era of Muhammad ibn 'Abdil Wahhab, which was mainly da'wah, where him and Muhammad bin Sa'ud captured areas in Najd but didn't really fight against the Ottomans. Then the 2nd era is during early 1800s in the life of his grandchildren like Sulayman ibn 'Abdillah bin Muhammad ibn 'Abdil Wahhab and the Aal Sa'ud who captured Hijaz from the Ottomans but it was justified because the Ottomans by the 1800s had fallen into clear apostasy, like sanctioning grave worship, ruling by man made laws, and allying with Kuffar against Muslims. The Ottomans later recaptured Hijaz and slaughtered the Najdis and their scholars. The 3rd era is early 1900s where 'Abd al 'Aziz ibn Sa'ud captured Hijaz with help of British and turning on his own sincere soldiers ("al Ikhwan") rendering him an apostate Kafir, so by this time both the ottomans and the Saudis were Kafir apostates.
Any valid points in your comment were kind of lost in all the takfir.
@truth seeker firstly that statement is totally false as the scholars have mentioned, for example every laymen muslim makes takfir on the Qadianiyya, its actually Wajib in many cases for the layman to make takfir. And secondly I didn't decide by myself that these states were Kuffar, the scholars themselves have written books mentioning their Kufr, so as a laymen I'm following the scholars, actually even many Sufi scholars made takfir on the Ottomans, read the works of al Jabarti who wrote about them alot. So please just stop.
akhi wana talk with u a bit? Any fb/twitter?
@@mohammadshuayb3944 twtr
@@ath_thabaat link?
Really interesting podcast 😊
so... when's zeeshan coming on again
Soon insha'Allah!
The modern Saudi Salafi(usually Hanbali) ironically share more in common with Sh.Sulayman Ibn Abdulwahab(r.h) than they do with MIAW. Their refutations of the Khwarij are almost entirely from his thought. Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah(r.h) thought was actually used as a rebuttal against the takfir of the early Najdi movement.
The saud clan and Abdul wahab both joined in a pact. I don't know what the Abdul wahab offered the Saudis both they agreed to spread his teachings. Abdul wahaba teachings is the teachings of Ibn taymiyyah and thus you have the salafies of today who claim to be authentic hanbalis but in reality they are not. Ibn taymiyyahs halaqas were very small in his time didn't have a big following at all, he was prisoned a lot coz of his controversial ideas but nonetheless he was a great scholar. But I feel are a bit to extreme thus you get the salafis of today being very extreme or strict which is a shame.
What does MIAW mean?
@@salebaan1 Muhammad ibn AbdulWahab.
Lol pokemon runner
Ibn taymiyyah WASNT anti Kalam he didn't agree with MOST OF ALL of the Kalam principles and he even introduced his own principles which were more in line in his opinion to Islam. He hated Aristotles logic coz he says the principal derive from a mushrik religion (Greek)
You mean ibnu Taymiyah was anti -ilmul kalam, as in refuted it.
@@Csense-se5ke he refuted the principles of ilmul Kalam which were used by the Greeks whom Muslim scholars implemented.
Allahumma barik lahu brother hijab should be more humble and be clear he is not a scholar
He is such a humble man... don’t know how much more humble he can be.
Did he ever claim to be a scholar?
What about Tassawuf?
Hijab is completely wrong in his assumption that Bashar Al Assad is non-muslim. Unless he personally asked him about his beliefs, you can't assume you know what he believes. Even if he's born Alawi, you don't know how he was raised or if he changed his belifs at any point.
@Jam eelah you're speaking from complete ignorance.
Who is dhuro saniya
It's a fatawa compilation of shaykh muhummed bin abdilwahab and his offsprings who were also scholars
I'm also curious as to how hijaab defends ITs 'contingencies without any firsts' among various other doctrinal issue found in the works of IT.
B O I
Down to Islam.
lol @20:32
Are u lot mad. Bashir assad is an enemy of Isreal. The saudi ruler is a friend of Isreal. so u cant just say he is an Alawi therefore u can rise against him whilst the saudi ruler is a muslim so u cant go agaibst him. If u beleive that u can go against bashir assad then u will leave yourself open to be manipulated by his enemies for thier own agenda. Where is the wisdom .
Bashar al asad had people rise against him because he gassed them with chemical weapons at protest, and Mohammed hijab and 5 pillars media aren’t pro Saudi Arabia they don’t support either
Did Mohammed Hijab come to Bedford???
Yes :)
5Pillars no way!!! Where abouts if u don’t mind me asking? I’m a big fan, oh man 😶
@@k-noorb9790 Queens Park.
5Pillars 😵 I live in QP!! 😩
26:08
As an Ash3ari, I mostly agree with Muhammad Hijab's views although I think he has been a bit too generous to include Ibn Taymiyya in to the philosophical arena and historically wrong. And the current editions of al-Rad 3la l-Bakri are pure nonsense and reduce him to a nobody, whilst the truth was Ibn Taymiyya himself was a nobody in Egypt at that time. Read Ibn Hajar's tarjama of the Shaykh compared to the Wahhabi editions.
Historically, Ibn Taymiyya's contributions to the Hanbali Madhab were no where near as Ibn Qudama - I have no idea how Hijab claimed he reached and excelled Imam Ahmad. Even Majd l-Din has more status in the Madhab. Lets not forget that Ibn Taymiyya's opinions were fringe in the Madhab (such as Talaq) hence the refutations.
Infact Ibn Taymiyya was clumsy and made mistakes in every field he entered. This is why the 3ulama would say 3ilmuh akbar min 3qlih (his knowledge was greater than his intelligence).
May Allah have mercy on him and forgive him for his shortcomings. Ameen Ya Rab.
Well said Ibn taymiyyah had very few following in his majaalis. Purely coz of his controversial ideas but his follower has Abdul wahab has spread his teachings to this day you have the salafis who are not proper hanbalis who claim they are. But Ibn taymiyyah did refute the Aristotle logic very well in his rad Al mantiqyeen
Ur Ashari so i see why u have this view on ibn Taymiyah.
SLY DIGS AT SHAMSI and SALAFIS, Hijab I expected you to be more manly than that. What he did to you last summer wasn't malicious in fact you went to him and challenged him. Don't hate him because brought nothing but evidence, you shouldn't hate based personal offence.
@@muhammadahmed-pc8ke OK my shoe polish name one evidence
@@muhammadahmed-pc8ke bro im not a spub hizbi but he's right. Shamsi schooled him last year.
Shamsi does the same thing.. whenever he can throws digs at Hijab and Ali etc.
Sly? He mentioned him by name?
If you brother's are truly salafi you should be more worried how hijab and these blood brother's are trying to differentiate between Ibn Taymiyah and muhummed bin abdilwahab
It's sad to see islam dying in the uk. I am meeting more and more ex muslims. Hope this trend changes, alhamdulillah
Lol what nonsense, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the UK. Good try though.
Hahahahahahajahahaha Alhamdulillah 💚
@jeremy steiner Both actually
I meet a lot of people who have left Islam, but I've met far more people who have become Muslims! By conversion! 😊
@@Chakswari101 We also have the largest number of people leaving the religion too.. Apostasy is the highest in Islam. Fact.
It’s truly shameful how many lies Mohammed Hijab managed to squeeze in this podcast against the Salafis just because they refuted his batil Ikhwani ideas. And in Ramadan as well. Some people truly have no shame.
He was addressing your Spub hizb which is the cause of every type of fitna amongst salafis worldwide. May Allah guide you or break you back!
SP-Files Who are you? Youv'e made a youtube channel against the brothers at salafi publications but you refuse to reveal your identity?
Is this the way of the prophets and their companions? Or even the way of the salaf, to hide your identity when warning against what you believe to be baatil.
Reveal your identity if you truly believe you are calling to the truth. Where is your istiqamah? Where is your transparent dawah?
@@user-ky5zy5qm8hالحرب خدعة that's my answer to your question.
Adam Badani just ignore this sp files guy. He’s just another bitter failure who’s burning in his rage.
SP-Files So basically I ask you how old are you and you respond with I like the colour green.
And by the way im also confused about the nature of your channel, you post any video of anything criticising shamsi or spubs even if it contradicts itself... for example.
How are you posting a video saying that the mufti is a scholar of jarh and ta'deel and then posting a video where sheikh fawzan is saying there is no jarh and ta'deel today? That is ridiculous because either you hold Sheikh Zayd to be right or Sheikh Fawzan to be right.
If you hold there is no jarh and ta'deel today, therefore shk fawzan refuted Sheikh zayd and Sheikh Zayd has refuted you and shk fawzan
If you hold there is jarh and ta'deel today therefore shk fawzans kalam is batil and youve posted it as a refutation against shamsi which you dont even believe is correct.
You are literally a حاطب ليل who gathers anything he can to attack the salafi brothers even if the material you are bringing contradicts one another. So let me ask you something, is it permissible for people to take knowledge from someone who is مجهول ? Yes or no.
If you say Yes then bring proof from the quran and sunnah and salaf otherwise you have produced an innovation into the deen
If you say No then you are promoting people to take knowledge from you by setting up a youtube channel and posting videos whilst you hide your identity.
Be a man and stop being a little coward, and have istiqamah upon the truth. At least Abu khadeejah and co are real men that show their identity and expose the people of innovation with istiqamah and honour. Maybe you should take a note from their book.
May Allah expose you and expose your baatil and lies....
i just wanted to comment on syria. kuruj on the muslim ruler. i was under the impression it was a israel american european nato kuruj once again and those who fought against the assad syrian government who are mainly muslims were actually in alliance with these said actors. as assad and syria were one of the most ardent and outspoken supporters of the arab muslims in the holy land and constent condemers of the israeli oppression along with gadafi and iran and venezuala. to be outspoken about these genocidal maniac oppresors i.e israel america nato can cost you your country your lives your freedom your visas your wealth your property. the ultimate sacrifices fissibililah. the greatest jihad is a true word to an oppressor.
Did Assad start the killing of unarmed protesters before ppl from the outside got involved, thats my first question.
Is Assad a muslim??? Second question.
@@salebaan1 maybe you have some points. but the quran strictly prohibits an alliance with the jewish christian alliance. and to say the assadist have killied more muslims then the above alliance is laughable. surely its time for muslims to ally themselves with russia and their allies. this response answers both my commenters.
@@aliabumaryam1801 I never argued for christian Jewish alliance also you have not answered my 2 questions.
@@salebaan1 i dont know about assad or the allowites or killing of unarmed protestors.
@@aliabumaryam1801 Are you Shia?