Chick Young v James Traynor (Part 1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
  • Chic Young & Jim Traynor FIGHT on BBC Radio Scotland 2.4.11 regarding Rangers.
    videocelts.com/...
    www.scotzine.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 83

  • @xtraspecialmango
    @xtraspecialmango 8 років тому +13

    The Succulent Lamb is Off, Gentlemen :)

  • @skimpzd
    @skimpzd 12 років тому +6

    Jim Traynor and Chick Young are basically the spokesmen for Rangers and especially when Murray was chairman,and who will provide yer lovely lamb now Traynor ?

  • @Mr-zx8fu
    @Mr-zx8fu 5 років тому +5

    I remember this job interview.

  • @MikeS67007
    @MikeS67007 12 років тому +9

    If Traynor had still been writing for the Herald he would have been concentrating on the likelihood of them going bust, rather than arguing with Chic on whether Alistair Johnstone indicated they may go bust, or writing tabloid pish every other day...such is his lot on life now...
    & they went bust. Funny that...

  • @markcollins2383
    @markcollins2383 4 роки тому +7

    After all of that Rangers did go bust and Jim Traynor became head of PR for the newly formed club playing from Ibrox.

    • @rfc1872-g3w
      @rfc1872-g3w 2 роки тому +3

      Check the record books 55 titles keep being jealous 😂👍

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      The club didn't go bust the old company did. Charles Green brought the rights over which allowed the company to face the financial consequences whilst buying the rights over, and retaining the club under a newco. FYI Jim Traynor is no longer part of the club. He's been away from Ibrox for about 5 years now

    • @Wull-cfc67
      @Wull-cfc67 6 днів тому

      ​@crs2385 o please fukn behave

  • @whoknowsthebowler
    @whoknowsthebowler 10 років тому +9

    Traynor = message boy.

  • @jamessmyth7443
    @jamessmyth7443 2 роки тому +3

    Well they did go bust and Traynor was finally proven to be a handmaiden for both entities calling themselves ‘Rangers’.

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому +1

      There isn't ''both entities'' in regards to the club. There was The Rangers Football Club Plc which went bust, and the newco was set up, and bought the rights to Rangers FC over thus we're still legally allowed to be called Rangers, and that's why every governing body in sport, including Lord Nimmo Smith's commission stating this.

    • @jamessmyth7443
      @jamessmyth7443 2 роки тому +1

      @@crs2385 I don’t think you’re trying to convince me here.

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      @@jamessmyth7443 Oh well

  • @SpiritKnob
    @SpiritKnob 11 років тому +2

    The following week, they argued over a flick of a wrist.

  • @Mintsauce27
    @Mintsauce27 10 років тому +3

    9:48 is brilliant :)

  • @antoniousf
    @antoniousf 13 років тому +2

    he said, no you said, no he nodded but he didn't say, then he said he saw him nod, which means he did nod but didn't say. lets face it RFC will not go out of business because their friends at the SFA do everything in their power to ensure that is the case, did i just say that or was i thinking it

  • @oceallaigh2003
    @oceallaigh2003 12 років тому +6

    well after all that the Huns are bust anyway,Traynor needs to be taken outside and given a Glasgow kiss or two.

  • @TheLexyboy
    @TheLexyboy 13 років тому +3

    as they say in "chewin the fat"- couple of fannies.....

  • @mixn44
    @mixn44 13 років тому +2

    A Nod, Is As Good As A Wink,
    To A Blind Bat,
    Or A Baldy Fat Rat
    Or A Specky Prat.

  • @greenlichtie
    @greenlichtie 4 роки тому +1

    Proof that 2 negatives DON'T make a positive........we support St Mirren and Airdrie; honest

  • @supergaryhooper88
    @supergaryhooper88 13 років тому +4

    traynor looks a bit like jabba hut

  • @JB-qr2jq
    @JB-qr2jq Рік тому +1

    Andddd they did go bust.

  • @roscomccreadie907
    @roscomccreadie907 6 років тому +3

    Battle of the fuds

  • @plpra79
    @plpra79 12 років тому +2

    So what s going on with wangers now Chic!

  • @markcollins2383
    @markcollins2383 8 років тому +2

    Whats all the fuss about it was only the holding company was it not?

    • @utubetomgee
      @utubetomgee 8 років тому +2

      Holding company has nought to do with it. Holding company outlived the incorporated club. RFC was a business. The holding company was nothing to do with the liquidation of Rangers. Murray holding company recently died as well. Might be the reason Murray sold club for 1 pound to Whyte? Murray holding company couldn't prevent the incorporated club RFC from dying. Whites Holding company was fund less when RFC the club died. The nonsense presented by MSM and clandestine forces that suggest RFC was unincorporated during liquidation is blatant political spin. The law of incorporated club is quite clear and easily researched. TRFC in its legal dealing at court of session had lawyers guffawing at the notion RFC the club was distinct from the incorporated club that is effectively dead still in liquidation and awaiting supreme court judgement before the famous club can be buried properly. Buying assets from an incorporated club is not buying the club. Its calling buying a basket of assets to create anew club. And the real club is still attached to its incorporated entity which stopped being going concern in 2012. This Jabba attack was one year before the liquidation actually happened. Jabba is still the mouth piece of deceptive political spin that has RFC fans believing their club is still intact. Just shows how unobjective MSM in Scotland has become that Political spin of mistruths can be passed as fact while ignoring the actual real law of the land.

    • @markcollins2383
      @markcollins2383 8 років тому +1

      +utubetomgee thanks for comprehensively clearing that up. I hope you my sense of sarcasm was picked up before you responded!

    • @rfc1872-g3w
      @rfc1872-g3w 2 роки тому +1

      @@utubetomgee Check the record books 55 titles keep being jealous 😂👍

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      @@utubetomgee The company was formed in 1899 not 1872. The club has been going since 1872, and everything consisting of the sporting entity continued on when the newco bought the club from the oldco. You seem to misunderstand the incporporation claim, the ''one, and the same'' indestingishable argument isn't a literal one, and nowhere does it say incorporation can prevent a club, or brand from being sold. Nowhere does it say incorporation prevents the rights being bought over, which is indeed what happened. To quote the sale
      ''The Rangers Football Club Plc ceased to be the owner, and operator of a football team in consequence of the SALE to Sevco Scotland Ltd by it's administrators on June 14th 2012 of substantially the whole of the business, and undertaking, including Rangers Football Club Article 6 of the articles of associations of the SPL provides''.
      The administrators even dealing with the negotiations with the clubs sale to Green even came out, and stated the club will remain. ua-cam.com/video/ic7xxeu1KXA/v-deo.html
      So no this isn't a ''media lie'' or ''Rangers fans claims'' this is backed up by the official sale, and Lord Nimmo Smith's legal commission found the club continues in existence despite it's transfer to another owner/operator. It's not like Rangers are the only club to do this either. It allows the preservation of the sporting entity, whilst at the same time letting the company bare the financial consequences.
      Not to mention the governing bodies stance, along with HMRC stating ''liquidation doesn't prejudice the proposed sale of the club. A sale can either take place through a CVA or liquidation. Don't talk to us about ''law'' when the law regarding incorporation is only relevant if that club dies with the company. It doesn't say the club cannot be bought over from another company. The only folk who claim the ''dead club'' nonsense are bitter celtic fans, and anyone who hates Rangers. It's pathetic

  • @riboid
    @riboid 9 років тому +12

    Haha and they did go bust. All semantics now.

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      The club survived when the newco bought the rights over.

  • @christophercoyle65
    @christophercoyle65 2 роки тому +2

    traynor the sevco puppet

  • @saints16o5o87
    @saints16o5o87 6 років тому +2

    wheres jimmy sanderson when you need him. " were you at the game today? " no? hang up goodbye!
    chick young , sevco fan disguising himself as a st mirren fan, jim traynor sevco fan masquerading as an airdrie fan.
    can you see the common denominator????? both support teams who no longer exist . sevco for chick young and sevco and airdrie for traynor.

    • @mrhenke7480
      @mrhenke7480 5 років тому +1

      brian marshall traynor always been a hun he works with them he's a scumbag. Chic is probs a st Mirren fan but he loves Walter smith so he might be a hun in disguise but he's not as sub human as jabba

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      ''The Rangers Football Club Plc ceased to be the owner, and operator of a football team in consequence of the SALE to Sevco Scotland Ltd by it's administrators on June 14th 2012 of substantially the whole of the business, and undertaking, including Rangers Football Club Article 6 of the articles of associations of the SPL provides''.
      Teams that no longer exist? The oldco was liquidated, the club was bought over by the newco

  • @gregsyswilly
    @gregsyswilly 13 років тому +2

    Loves it! Two huns getting crabbit about their shitey club going bust!

  • @antonbracken5951
    @antonbracken5951 4 роки тому +2

    A couple of FANNIES!

  • @kinc1967
    @kinc1967 13 років тому +3

    Two doughnuts.

  • @42Adam199642
    @42Adam199642 13 років тому +2

    how does chick young still have a job

    • @Con-Man1993
      @Con-Man1993 2 роки тому

      How are Rangers not a new club???

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      @@Con-Man1993 Because Charles Green's consortium bought the club out of the old company.

    • @wardie8929
      @wardie8929 Рік тому +1

      @@crs2385 what? They are deed

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 Рік тому

      @@wardie8929 Wrong

    • @kevinmcnicoll8649
      @kevinmcnicoll8649 5 місяців тому +1

      Because they did go bust

  • @zippykills
    @zippykills 6 років тому +4

    whyte knight lol

  • @SuperDollerman
    @SuperDollerman 13 років тому +3

    2 huns having a go at each other brilliant 2 puppets on a string along with the other skintys poodles the end is nigh

  • @oldmacdreadapexriddims1460
    @oldmacdreadapexriddims1460 8 років тому +3

    Newco...rangers no longer exist,,,so please remove the jelly tots from strip.

  • @ayem8320
    @ayem8320 6 років тому

    Traynor= legend

  • @mixn44
    @mixn44 13 років тому

    CHICO SPEAKA Da Truth.
    CHCO The Prophet.

  • @johnmclister5979
    @johnmclister5979 9 років тому +2

    BUST BUST BUST.LIQUIDATED..DEAD AS A DODO..HA HA HA

    • @rfc1872-g3w
      @rfc1872-g3w 2 роки тому +1

      Check the record books 55 titles keep being jealous 😂👍

    • @crs2385
      @crs2385 2 роки тому

      Nope, Green's consortium bought the club over. The sale of the club is confirmed via article 6 of the articles of associations act of the SPL

    • @davidbroadley126
      @davidbroadley126 Рік тому

      @@rfc1872-g3w u never won 55 how can u say that when u were cheating u can knock at least 5 0r 6 off your 55 u cheating cunts

    • @rfc1872-g3w
      @rfc1872-g3w Рік тому

      @@davidbroadley126 Ebts where legal when rangers started fact. Only cheating was Celtic who bought players instead of paying the victims for decades until it was too late for many, saying that they are a separate entity from the boys club that's made them millions

    • @Notanothersharedilution
      @Notanothersharedilution Рік тому +1

      @@rfc1872-g3w neely, dunn