This podcast is one of the best within the Non-left ....The diversity of guests, topics, amd the way you carry out the conversation like an intimate chit-chat and profound learning session at the same time is unbelievable Arihant Bhai ❤❤❤
I get it brothers....I get what you are saying...I meant the Indic/Dharmic ecosystem but those are overarching terms..I wanted to emphasise specifically on the political aspect for which, in my limited knowledge there isn't any indigenous terminology. If there is any I am happy to being corrected...Peace✌🏽🙏🏽
@@tarunkaushik1214 भ्राता, OG से तात्पर्य है Original Gangsta. इसे आमूमन उस व्यक्ति के लिए उपयोग करते हैं जिसने अपने कार्यक्षेत्र में अद्वितीय एवं मौलिक कार्य किया हो! उदाहरणतयः - Einstein OG hai! Emiway Bantai OG nahi hai! अत्यादि!
4:52 6:30 9:28 Associating Hinduism with Vedas 10:50 Origin of Vedas 14:27 Other religions in India 19:00 Reason for Vedas gaining prominence 20:34 Why its difficult to convert people out of Islam 24:10 Proclivity of Hindus to convert 28:15😂 32:25 Protestant 34:35 Positive and Negative view of Secularism, USA and France 35:25 Nehruvian Secularism 38:29 Minority rights 48:18 Root of Western Law 54:39 Homosexuality 59:50 'UNITY' 1:26:45 1:33:11 prolly another reason why Buddhism perished 1:36:51 wow
Great podcast ❤, Dr. koenraad elst sir is a well known author. he has written so many books every indian should read his book. Still no trace of aryan invasion is a must read book for every indian. Thank you arihant ji for this podcast
One thing you should keep in mind while interviewing Dr. Elst is that don't interrupt his thought process let him complete on one point and move to other.
Thank you so much arihant ji for this channel and such valuable conversations. Can't express how important such initiatives are. Will surely contribute to and also share your channel 🙏
Thanks for the episode Vaad. One point I would like to make is that Guest is being interrupted many a times in between by the host. Please let him speak freely.
@@vamsikrishna3855 he was more of a grey persona rather than black or white and should be treated as such. Did you knew he fasted unto death to protest ambedkar’s demanad of separate electorates for dalits. Imagine the state of hinduism in todays india had that have happened. I m thankfull that he resisted. Om Shanti Gandhi
Gandhi ke brahmacharya prayog: By shankar Sharan can also give you shocking inf about this sanaki Baba he has almost destroyed him by solid facts based on his own Selected work of MG.
Mahabharata is our cultural text but it is not our scripture. Is important to understand classification of texts in our faith. Smriti means that which is heard ie. From Brahman (God). Smriti means that which is remembered ie. History and literature written by man. Shruti is the English equivalent of scripture and Smriti is the English equivalent of a novel you buy from a book store. The only shruti text is The Vedas. However, there are numerous smriti written by all sorts of rishi's, guru's, etc. Namely, the Puranas, the Upanishads, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Bhagavat Gita. The distinction was made because smriti's are the authors hypothesis or opinions. They're not fact. They may contain pieces of fact here and there but since it is not considered the word of Brahman it cannot be of equal authority as the Vedas. Smriti is the culture which is ever-changing whilst Shruti is everlasting dharma regardless of the yuga. Smriti documents perspectives in our culture in a certain given time but its also the authors opinion so there are millions of smriti just like theres so many UA-cam comments. Doesn't mean all are followed or agreed to be practiced by the society. Similarly Mahabharata is a commentary of our society during the time it was written and documents a historical event important for our society and people. Its a great text to learn what to do and not to do and it gets you thinking about dharma but to know what *is* dharma and what we are to practice per scripture then you'd only find that jn The Vedas. Hope this clears this up!
The Pauranic tradition is neglected in this conversion. Not everyone can read Ved, but Pauranic stories are accessible to all. Many of the festivals are in fact from Purana and not itihas. Take all the festivals for chaturmasya for example.
Because it's important to understand classification of texts in our faith. Smriti means that which is heard ie. From Brahman (God). Smriti means that which is remembered ie. History and literature written by man. Shruti is the English equivalent of scripture and Smriti is the English equivalent of a novel you buy from a book store. The only shruti text is The Vedas. However, there are numerous smriti written by all sorts of rishi's, guru's, etc. Namely, the Puranas, the Upanishads, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Bhagavat Gita. The distinction was made because smriti's are the authors hypothesis or opinions. They're not fact. They may contain pieces of fact here and there but since it is not considered the word of Brahman it cannot be of equal authority as the Vedas. Nowadays everyone can read The Vedas. You don't have to join a gurukula and spend your whole life learning just one book. The fact is though that you will probably never grasp the meaning of just one book of The Vedas without proper instruction. It's like opening a physics book with no background knowledge and trying to learn. It can be done but it'll just be difficult. Also, festivals are culture. They're not the faith. That's why as you pointed out you find them in Puranas- a smriti text. Smriti is the culture which is ever-changing whilst Shruti is everlasting dharma regardless of the yuga. Hope this clears this up!
@@panjabipandit lmao. A valid study of the Veda is only possible after a life long study of Vedanga and Upaveda. Without that, one is left at the mercy of bad translations like those of Arya Samaj and TH Griffith.
Let's learn from the past, but we are living in the present. We are Hindus! Be proud to be a Hindu, we do Yoga ("Yuj Atman Brahman ca") and we seek Atma Darsana (Paramo Dharma).
If the most liberal of the religions/way of life can get diluted and abandoned by humans,,do you the think the "stricter"/ more orthodox doctrines/mono theism will survive for long? I don't think so..unless it is monetarily incentivized.
Shahaji was a mercenary for the Mughals. 1. Mercenary is an unusual term, he was a feudal vassal 2. Was he vassal to the Mughals? To the Nizamshahi and then Adilshahi is known, Mughals, could we have details please.
Swami Ramsukhdasji and Gita Press consistently spoke against abortion and contraception, and they did not even talk about demographic imbalance, they were against these pracitces for non-HIndus as well.
Dayanand Saraswatiji has found a new space especially on UA-cam which on a hidden surface has a problem with his idea of abandoning idol worshipping. Please make references to any book or historical record when you claim to quote someone.
Disappointed with Koenraad Elst's views about Vedas vis-a-vis Hinduism. I don't know if he meant them rhetorically or factually. If he meant them factually, then they are shallow and one-dimensional views of what the Vedas contain. He says that Hinduism is older than the Vedas, it does not begin with the Vedas and that Vedas are not the source of Hinduism. This is quite artificial and just a game of semantics. When Elst says that "Hinduism" means "some kind of religiosity which existed all over the world with an open system of preachers moving around, etc." - he is precisely describing the numerous rishis and their disciples. The Vedas are nothing but the collection of the sayings of various rishis. In fact, Vedas are the prototype for all philosophies and religious practices that have developed in India. As someone who has studied the Vedas in great depth, I can say with 100% confidence that the seeds of all paths in Hinduism (i.e. as Elst defines "Hinduism" i.e. including Jainism, Buddhism, Bhakti, Shakta practices, etc.) can be seen in the Vedic texts. In later periods, the Vedas after their canonization, were raised high above and out of reach of the common people, so that the Vedas and Vedic practices were began to be seen as "elite". But the contents of the Vedas show that they are nothing but a refined form of folk religions. So the Vedic religious practices and Vedic concepts and spiritual ideas truly represented the masses. Besides, the current version of the Vedas is clearly not the oldest. As the rishis themselves talk about their fathers, forefathers and ancestors who were the first pathfinders and teachers. So the current version is the most recent available version. But obviously the traditions encapsulated in the Vedas go back into deep antiquity. So in the truest sense, the Vedas are really the source of Hinduism. Elst says that Bharadvaja started the Vedic tradition. Which is not true at all. Bharadvaja has a long lineage from rishi Angiras and Brhaspati. In the currently available Rig Veda, Bharadvaja's hymns are the oldest surviving. But he himself does not claim to have started the Vedic tradition. The current Vedas are a final form of a very long tradition that encompassed all traditions from across India. A typical outcome of the western lens of looking at the Vedas is that everything is viewed in parts, without realizing that these parts integrate into a whole. Also, Elst while talking about why the Vedas became prominent, he says the Vedas were impressive because of recitation, regardless of what is in there. He fails to emphasize the deep metaphysics and spiritual knowledge that is the core of the Vedas.
I know the purpose of Vaad is different from what I am suggesting. But Vaad should think of now expand it's reach by reaching out to noble persons, heads of different sects of hinduism and discuss with them different aspects of hinduism rather say sanatan so as to instill in the people of their followings about the pride of being a sanatani, bharatiya first rather than identifying self from one's sect (more precisely "jaati"). The faster we do the better we will be to protect fast deteriorating hindu practices which have it's reason more so on to demonstrate self as more secularist than other. Sanatan by it's nature itself is secular one. Had it not been the case today's Bharat would have been different. One cannot expect this from school education because of the while lot of repressive provisions of constitution which were put with a long standing agenda of British and Islamists. Society and each sect per say should start teaching the cultural values to future generations along with the reason to perform particular ritual. In my understanding this is the best way to save our tradition from vanishing just like other traditions of the world lost/vanished.
Well.. I don’t understand why HINDUS are dependent on politicians, who are primarily are existing for votes. Be self dependent.. use your skills to promote Dharma..
Really slow conversation. You can listen at 1.5x speed :)
अरिहंत जी आप अपनी वीडियो मैं सबटाइटल्स भी एड कर देगे तो और भी बढ़िया रहेगा।
I already listen to most yt vedios at 2X
Bhai main 2x dekhta hu
I like this slow conversation 🙂
It's a pleasure to listen to Dr Elst.
A 2-hour podcast is most welcome :)
This podcast is one of the best within the Non-left ....The diversity of guests, topics, amd the way you carry out the conversation like an intimate chit-chat and profound learning session at the same time is unbelievable Arihant Bhai ❤❤❤
For starters, stop calling the discourse as "non-left". It's self-defeating in case you can't see through this.
Stop making it right or left
I get it brothers....I get what you are saying...I meant the Indic/Dharmic ecosystem but those are overarching terms..I wanted to emphasise specifically on the political aspect for which, in my limited knowledge there isn't any indigenous terminology. If there is any I am happy to being corrected...Peace✌🏽🙏🏽
@@aishwaryprabalpandey2384 then just call it "right".
@@vee2106 indic is better.😍
Wow Koenraad Elst🔥
One of my favorite intellectuals
Always honest and blunt.
His works are really interesting quite a page turner tbh.
Thank you, Sir, Koenraad Elst. It is a necessary discourse for all Sanatanis. Tnx for debate.
Today he is with us teaching the nationalism lessons it is so blessed to have him in our college 🤗😊☺️
It's always a pleasure listening to Dr Koenraad:)
Indeed a man of words.
What can I say in praise of what you have done for this civilization, Konrad, I have no words. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Dr. Elst is REAL OGGG!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
What does that mean?OGGG?
@@tarunkaushik1214 भ्राता, OG से तात्पर्य है Original Gangsta. इसे आमूमन उस व्यक्ति के लिए उपयोग करते हैं जिसने अपने कार्यक्षेत्र में अद्वितीय एवं मौलिक कार्य किया हो!
उदाहरणतयः - Einstein OG hai! Emiway Bantai OG nahi hai! अत्यादि!
@@zangoz_2693 BRUH
No 1 quality podcast I have been following off late. Kudos to you young Arihant Bhai 👏👏
Wonderful session was this. Listened to it 2 times in a week 👏
Very enriching.. I wish we would have video recording sessions of SITA RAM GOEL ji in his life time like this...
4:52
6:30
9:28 Associating Hinduism with Vedas
10:50 Origin of Vedas
14:27 Other religions in India
19:00 Reason for Vedas gaining prominence
20:34 Why its difficult to convert people out of Islam
24:10 Proclivity of Hindus to convert
28:15😂
32:25 Protestant
34:35 Positive and Negative view of Secularism, USA and France
35:25 Nehruvian Secularism
38:29 Minority rights
48:18 Root of Western Law
54:39 Homosexuality
59:50 'UNITY'
1:26:45
1:33:11 prolly another reason why Buddhism perished
1:36:51 wow
Thanku🙏
🙏
Its so easy, open and smooth to talk and listen Dr. Elst. Waah...beautiful
Great podcast ❤, Dr. koenraad elst sir is a well known author. he has written so many books every indian should read his book. Still no trace of aryan invasion is a must read book for every indian. Thank you arihant ji for this podcast
Great conversation. I only wish Arihant would interject the guest less; I would have liked to hear Koenraad in full flow without getting interrupted.
By far the best channel on UA-cam ❤️
One thing you should keep in mind while interviewing Dr. Elst is that don't interrupt his thought process let him complete on one point and move to other.
We should be so very grateful to Koenraad Elst 🙏
Thanks for bringing Dr Koenraad Elst🙏
Great conversation! Konrad ji has such vast knowledge
Another outstanding dialogue! Thank you Arihant and Koenraad ji.
Shashtang Pranam to both of you.🙏
This knowledge renaissance will do wonders to our future generations. 🙌
Best podcast channel for me ...the way you converse with the guest is very nice..it keeps me glued to it
This was the most enjoyable podcast I have listened in a while.
Great work Sir, continue doing the same.
All the best!
Thanks for your efforts Arihant Bhai
This episode is a gem. 🧡
Great interview as always. You're making the standards of interviews very high. I now find many other videos so out of depth these days.
Dr. Elst combines great learning with exceptional alertness. Congratulations. The interviewer needs to soften his Ts, Ds. They really jar.
Arihant, your every guest and delightful conversation is a surprise to me.
Thanks vaad for bringing the content like this.
Thank you so much arihant ji for this channel and such valuable conversations. Can't express how important such initiatives are.
Will surely contribute to and also share your channel 🙏
Dr. Koenraad Elst is a Rishi of modern India. His knowledge of Vedic Dharma is phenomenal.
Wow Finally Elst to this podcast 🔥
Very profound ❤
Thanks for the episode Vaad. One point I would like to make is that Guest is being interrupted many a times in between by the host. Please let him speak freely.
VERY GOOD PODCAST
Wonderful content
Dear Host - Please try inviting Mr. K N Rao as well. People will love it.
Ati uttam arihant ji
Very interesting points
Great interview
Arihant Ji, please call Acharya Prashant Tripathi for talks too. His vedantic insight in modern world gives great clarity to us youths. 😊
Lolwut 😂
Please invite him for a second round for discussing his views on the AIT/OIT, especially given the latest genetic evidence.
If I ever must keep a photo on my table or portrait behind as a statement it will be Koenraad Elst.
The way koenraad else says "pir milenge" at the end of the podcast is hilarious 😂😂😂♥️
Why I killed Mahatma, gave me a whole new perspective on the idiosyncratic personality of Gandhi.
idiosyncratic is a nice word to describe the person .
Pervert should have been the right word. Or say borderline narcissistic.
@@leibert6320 dr. Elst uses the same word in his above mentioned book
@@vamsikrishna3855 he was more of a grey persona rather than black or white and should be treated as such. Did you knew he fasted unto death to protest ambedkar’s demanad of separate electorates for dalits. Imagine the state of hinduism in todays india had that have happened. I m thankfull that he resisted. Om Shanti Gandhi
Gandhi ke brahmacharya prayog: By shankar Sharan can also give you shocking inf about this sanaki Baba he has almost destroyed him by solid facts based on his own Selected work of MG.
Nice and enlightened discussion
Eye opener ♥
Before Britishers came in, hindus had knowledge of their scriptures like Mahabharat etc. This is reflected in poetry of all Bhakti saints
Mahabharata is our cultural text but it is not our scripture. Is important to understand classification of texts in our faith. Smriti means that which is heard ie. From Brahman (God). Smriti means that which is remembered ie. History and literature written by man. Shruti is the English equivalent of scripture and Smriti is the English equivalent of a novel you buy from a book store. The only shruti text is The Vedas. However, there are numerous smriti written by all sorts of rishi's, guru's, etc. Namely, the Puranas, the Upanishads, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Bhagavat Gita. The distinction was made because smriti's are the authors hypothesis or opinions. They're not fact. They may contain pieces of fact here and there but since it is not considered the word of Brahman it cannot be of equal authority as the Vedas. Smriti is the culture which is ever-changing whilst Shruti is everlasting dharma regardless of the yuga. Smriti documents perspectives in our culture in a certain given time but its also the authors opinion so there are millions of smriti just like theres so many UA-cam comments. Doesn't mean all are followed or agreed to be practiced by the society. Similarly Mahabharata is a commentary of our society during the time it was written and documents a historical event important for our society and people. Its a great text to learn what to do and not to do and it gets you thinking about dharma but to know what *is* dharma and what we are to practice per scripture then you'd only find that jn The Vedas. Hope this clears this up!
Arihant bhai, I have commented this even earlier, kindly don't interrupt the guest.
Humble request 🙏
Pls guest ko bolne de... 🙏
I think it is important to revive Sanskrit so that people can read the original Hindu texts.
Hope more and more people will watch it
The Pauranic tradition is neglected in this conversion. Not everyone can read Ved, but Pauranic stories are accessible to all. Many of the festivals are in fact from Purana and not itihas.
Take all the festivals for chaturmasya for example.
I was thinking about this too.
Because it's important to understand classification of texts in our faith. Smriti means that which is heard ie. From Brahman (God). Smriti means that which is remembered ie. History and literature written by man. Shruti is the English equivalent of scripture and Smriti is the English equivalent of a novel you buy from a book store. The only shruti text is The Vedas. However, there are numerous smriti written by all sorts of rishi's, guru's, etc. Namely, the Puranas, the Upanishads, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Bhagavat Gita. The distinction was made because smriti's are the authors hypothesis or opinions. They're not fact. They may contain pieces of fact here and there but since it is not considered the word of Brahman it cannot be of equal authority as the Vedas. Nowadays everyone can read The Vedas. You don't have to join a gurukula and spend your whole life learning just one book. The fact is though that you will probably never grasp the meaning of just one book of The Vedas without proper instruction. It's like opening a physics book with no background knowledge and trying to learn. It can be done but it'll just be difficult. Also, festivals are culture. They're not the faith. That's why as you pointed out you find them in Puranas- a smriti text. Smriti is the culture which is ever-changing whilst Shruti is everlasting dharma regardless of the yuga. Hope this clears this up!
@@panjabipandit lmao. A valid study of the Veda is only possible after a life long study of Vedanga and Upaveda. Without that, one is left at the mercy of bad translations like those of Arya Samaj and TH Griffith.
Konred thanks 🙏🙏🙏
Great huge fan of Elst Sir
Leonard Sirf is a true Karm Yogi .
Hindus r highly indebted to him.🙏🙏
who is Leonard sirf?
Thanks
41k views in 1 year is almost criminal. This needs to go viral 😢
Let's learn from the past, but we are living in the present. We are Hindus! Be proud to be a Hindu, we do Yoga ("Yuj Atman Brahman ca") and we seek Atma Darsana (Paramo Dharma).
Do NOT interrupt the speaker. Let him speak
Love from jodhpur ❤️
If the most liberal of the religions/way of life can get diluted and abandoned by humans,,do you the think the "stricter"/ more orthodox doctrines/mono theism will survive for long? I don't think so..unless it is monetarily incentivized.
Like your videos
thanks.
Sir आप चंद्रचूड़ के conondrum किताब पर चर्चा कीजिए नेता जी पर आश्चर्यजनक और अप्रत्याशित जानकारी मिलेगी।
Ajeet bharti bhaiya ne unka interview liya hai do politics p kuch din m ajayega do parts m dekh lena.
Wow 🙏
સરસ 😎
Agree 🙏
Please bring David frawley
Arihant Bhaiya, this is THE ONLY PODCAST DISCUSSION CHANNEL I watch… Kudos to You… How old are you Bhaiya?
Hinduism kaa ek crash course honaa chahiye.
Are waah bhai
bring meenakshi jain for vasudev krishna and do it in hindi.
Mind blown
💯💯💯
💐
Shahaji was a mercenary for the Mughals.
1. Mercenary is an unusual term, he was a feudal vassal
2. Was he vassal to the Mughals? To the Nizamshahi and then Adilshahi is known, Mughals, could we have details please.
🔱🕉️🚩🙏
Swami Ramsukhdasji and Gita Press consistently spoke against abortion and contraception, and they did not even talk about demographic imbalance, they were against these pracitces for non-HIndus as well.
🙏🙏
Dayanand Saraswatiji has found a new space especially on UA-cam which on a hidden surface has a problem with his idea of abandoning idol worshipping. Please make references to any book or historical record when you claim to quote someone.
The interviewer knows nothing about Hinduism. Neti neti has a different connotation altogether.
👍👍👍👍👍👍
Neti neti vah Arihantji Shankaracharya ke shabdon se baat shuru ki aapne. Yeh sansaar ishwar ke swapn ka vichar matra hai
Disappointed with Koenraad Elst's views about Vedas vis-a-vis Hinduism. I don't know if he meant them rhetorically or factually. If he meant them factually, then they are shallow and one-dimensional views of what the Vedas contain. He says that Hinduism is older than the Vedas, it does not begin with the Vedas and that Vedas are not the source of Hinduism. This is quite artificial and just a game of semantics. When Elst says that "Hinduism" means "some kind of religiosity which existed all over the world with an open system of preachers moving around, etc." - he is precisely describing the numerous rishis and their disciples. The Vedas are nothing but the collection of the sayings of various rishis. In fact, Vedas are the prototype for all philosophies and religious practices that have developed in India. As someone who has studied the Vedas in great depth, I can say with 100% confidence that the seeds of all paths in Hinduism (i.e. as Elst defines "Hinduism" i.e. including Jainism, Buddhism, Bhakti, Shakta practices, etc.) can be seen in the Vedic texts. In later periods, the Vedas after their canonization, were raised high above and out of reach of the common people, so that the Vedas and Vedic practices were began to be seen as "elite". But the contents of the Vedas show that they are nothing but a refined form of folk religions. So the Vedic religious practices and Vedic concepts and spiritual ideas truly represented the masses.
Besides, the current version of the Vedas is clearly not the oldest. As the rishis themselves talk about their fathers, forefathers and ancestors who were the first pathfinders and teachers. So the current version is the most recent available version. But obviously the traditions encapsulated in the Vedas go back into deep antiquity. So in the truest sense, the Vedas are really the source of Hinduism.
Elst says that Bharadvaja started the Vedic tradition. Which is not true at all. Bharadvaja has a long lineage from rishi Angiras and Brhaspati. In the currently available Rig Veda, Bharadvaja's hymns are the oldest surviving. But he himself does not claim to have started the Vedic tradition. The current Vedas are a final form of a very long tradition that encompassed all traditions from across India.
A typical outcome of the western lens of looking at the Vedas is that everything is viewed in parts, without realizing that these parts integrate into a whole.
Also, Elst while talking about why the Vedas became prominent, he says the Vedas were impressive because of recitation, regardless of what is in there. He fails to emphasize the deep metaphysics and spiritual knowledge that is the core of the Vedas.
✔️
Interviewer is too much in love with his own voice, constantly interjecting with what he fancies are profundities....start doing monologues
Can someone please tell the names of his most famous books?
Talking about: Elst.?
Negationism in india
The problem with secularism
Still no trace of an Aryan invasion
And for more you can search..!
Kalika puran explains the term Hindu as land between Himalay and Indu sarovar
Agree to some extent but what is rightfully one community’s rights have to be taken by force. Horse trading doesn’t work with peaceful types.
please do a podcast with ashish dhar
❤️
bhut gyani purush h ; bas ek bat ka dukh h
bharat ko adhytam aur unki history bhi videshi sikha rhe 😂😂
nalle pan ki had par h
😂
BJP leaders are not even aware of the original purpose of these sacred places, how can they be loyal to that purpose as expected by Dr Elst.
I know the purpose of Vaad is different from what I am suggesting. But Vaad should think of now expand it's reach by reaching out to noble persons, heads of different sects of hinduism and discuss with them different aspects of hinduism rather say sanatan so as to instill in the people of their followings about the pride of being a sanatani, bharatiya first rather than identifying self from one's sect (more precisely "jaati"). The faster we do the better we will be to protect fast deteriorating hindu practices which have it's reason more so on to demonstrate self as more secularist than other. Sanatan by it's nature itself is secular one. Had it not been the case today's Bharat would have been different. One cannot expect this from school education because of the while lot of repressive provisions of constitution which were put with a long standing agenda of British and Islamists.
Society and each sect per say should start teaching the cultural values to future generations along with the reason to perform particular ritual. In my understanding this is the best way to save our tradition from vanishing just like other traditions of the world lost/vanished.
Vaad is the best UA-cam channel I found in 2021 👍👍👍.
plz give your UPI id.
Vaad@icici
Thats the reason spritulality is called adiatmikam, that is adi+atma+aikyam,
Well.. I don’t understand why HINDUS are dependent on politicians, who are primarily are existing for votes. Be self dependent.. use your skills to promote Dharma..
Sakal jagat mein khalsa panth gajje
Jagge Dharam Hindu, Turk Bhand Bhagge
I have not read any book of him. To start reading him which one book you would suggest me ?