Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
How Christian Were Taught | Church Fathers
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2022
- In this video, we'll provide a thorough breakdown of the Didache. We'll talk about what it is and how it was used in ancient times.
Excerpt:
One of the earliest Christian texts from the era immediately following the Apostles is the Didache (did-uh-KAY), a Greek term which means """"teaching"""" The translation of its longer and earlier title is """"The Teaching of the Lord Through the Apostles to the Nations.""""
Theology Academy is an EdTech organization dedicated to enhancing religious literacy through accessible media and outreach. Learn more about Theology Academy at: www.theology-a...
🔴 Subscribe to get more videos from Theology Academy
bit.ly/3IyOpRP
Church History:
• Church History | A Com...
Church History (1st - 5th Century):
• Church History (1st - ...
Church History (6th - 16th Century):
• Church History (6th - ...
Biblical Studies - Old Testament:
• Old Testament History ...
Biblical Studies - New Testament:
• New Testament History ...
Historical Jesus:
• Historical Jesus | A D...
Church Fathers:
• Church Fathers | Justi...
Christian Topics:
• Christian Topics | Fac...
----------------
Follow us:
Instagram : / engagetheology
Twitter : / engagetheology
Facebook : / engagetheology
#churchHistory #TheologyAcademy #apostolicfathers #icons #Gnostics #biblicalarchaeology #church #churchfathers #biblicalarchaeology #jesus #christian #gospel #theology #bible #Crusades #jerusalema #history #newtestamentchristianchurch #oldtestament #Didache #Apostles #greek
Great work brothers
Thank you 🙏🏼
What a great synopsis of the Didache. Thank you for providing a very clear lecture with useful supporting graphics. I find it interesting that baptism in running water (also a Jewish belief and part of John the Baptist’s practice) was included. Thanks for all the hard work.
This series is *exactly* what I was looking ( hoping ) for ! Thank you so much for doing this!
please look on youtube the boom called " when christians were jews the first generation" which shows that the early beliver keep the law of Moses even after the cruxifiction, we see this in Luke 23:56 where the women were keeping the sabbath day commandments.
One intriguing aspect of the Didache is a detail the book's authors left out. The NT gospels all discuss the "this is my body, this is my blood" oratory at the last supper. The Didache doesn't cite that ritual. This led to centuries of discussion, and conflict between various Christian sects regarding transubstantiation. The earliest Christians apparently took the gospel writings as analogous rather than something to be taken literally.
I notuced that too
Not If you read Ignatius of Antioch -seems pretty literal. John doesn't have the quote you are talking about, but it does have the specifics of Jn 6.
Source please.
@@hailholyqueenSource? If I was to post "I like my new socks", I'm sure somebody would ask for a source.
I offered an opinion contrasting the gospels with the Didache. We often form opinions based on sources and I was quite clear regarding the sources when I posted - (they were the gospels and the Didache).
Some people will agree with my opinion, as the first responder did. Others won't. The 2nd responder offered very good evidence and a respectful opinion. He disagreed with me, but he certainly understood which sources I had used in formulating my opinion.
@@davekearney1944 ok. Sometimes folks will offer an authoritative source to go with their opinions. Thanks for yours. Best wishes.
❤️ it stops abruptly and feels unfinished but was very informative and appreciated
We will reupload soon. Thanks for letting us know
Wow, This Channel is a blessing
Brilliant ☦️
☦️
☦
¡Muchas gracias! This was incredibly edifying and interesting. My desire to get my own Didache has increased as a result.
Thank you ...
Thank you! That was very helpful!
The Didache (Teaching) shows the earliest and most genuine form of Christianity though referred to just a “manual” or what seems to be very likely the case. How did this very simple form of worship, living “evolve” into a very complex philosophical and philological system filled with excessive analysis, conflicts, struggles … killings.. amongst so called “Christians” in the name of their “faith?” No offense here, also I appreciate your channel and videos! Most educational, keep it going (and always GOD Bless!)🙏❤️☀️How did LOVE one another become a chemistry laboratory of sorts, toxic nonetheless? 🙏❤️☀️
It was always like that. Paul's epistles are have a lot of him scolding people. Also, humans are violent. If countries become Christians they would still be violent. It doesn't mean it's Christianity itself it's just people who happen to be Christians at least officially.
It's like saying Christians invaded Iraq because George Bush is officially Christian.
Imo, it's because people were led away from the Church, the Orthodox Church.
Pride is the root of all sin. The Oriental Orthodox of the time would rather hold to their Christology than be united with the Church. The bishop of Rome in 1054 decided that his personal theology and pride was more important than keeping the Church unified.
Martin Lituer created 1,000 little popes, and since then, every man that thinks he's a theological genius starts his own little-c church.
And the Vatican has continued to badtardize their church.
Meanwhile, the Orthodox Church preserves the traditions, teachings, and sacrements of the Church Christ founded.
If the elaborate clothing and decorations seem like an invention, look up an Orthodox Jewish Sabbat service. The resemblance is uncanny.
Great video
sounds like it supports the evolution of Catholicism/Orthodox and the oriental Orthodox churches and entirely refutes every form of protestantism but especially calvinism
Protestants follow the canonized Bible not other books or teachings
@@massacre1013 So do Catholics. Who canonized the Bible?
It describes the following:
-Baptism of adults only (those who can fast), preferably by immersion and only by sprinkling if there isn’t enough water to immerse someone
-A simple church structure with only bishops and deacons (no priests and no inter-church hierarchy; no pope)
-No reference to transubstantiation, despite extensive discussion of the Eucharist
-Confession is described as ordinary confession among members, not liturgical confession to a priest
-No reference to reverence of or praying to dead saints; no reference to Mary
That doesn’t sound very Catholic/Orthodox to me. Sounds like a very low-church Protestant church, darn near Puritan/Baptist/CoC/Congregationalist.
@@Tennishangman It amazes me that the Catholics want to claim every church father and every Christian writing as their own and proof of their form of Christianity. They do revere the Didaches, but to claim it's Catholic is quite false. This very early document disproves the claim that the Catholic church sprang right out of Peter, immediately in the time of the apostles. There really is no trace of it in the Didache. The long title that mentioned the foundation of the 12 apostles, not just one, that's just huge and really goes to show how that whole, Peter/rock/keys/pope forever doctrine got in there much later.
Exactly
interesting that they held their meetings on Sunday not Sabbath.
Thank you so much. Do you have PPt for all your presentations
Not yet. However, you can access all our content on theology-academy.org
It is the catholic tradition which continues till these days. Thanks for sharing.
What do you see as evidence of that?
There’s no praying through saints
There’s no purgatory
What exactly is specifically Catholic about it??
@@mitchellc4 everything, it's the catholic tradition which we follow till these days. The priests teach us this.
@@mitchellc4 protestants wouldn't have this if Jesús followers wouldn't transmit to everyone. As well as the bible. It is tradition.
@@marcoflores6194
Hello
Again
So there’s nothing in it specifically Catholic
There’s no prayer to saints
There’s no purgatory
Etc
There’s nothing in it specifically Catholic
@@mitchellc4 through didache lots of protestants have come Back to catholic Church. And I algo have a quesitos for you. Who do you think have most of cristian books ? Catholic Church or protestant churches? Easy don't you think.
Well didache has chapters 1 to 6 is about the two paths.
7 to 10 is litúrgical and sacramental section which gives info about baptism, eucharisty and reconsiliation. (If you read properly you'll see hoy baptism was given to e everybody . Children included)
11 to 15 is about ministers of God and the fake ones
An 16 is about apostasy.
Read properly it is catholic teachings since they agregó with what we do.I dont have to explain more you Know which is the oldest church and Who translated most of books or Who wrote them . Fathers of church . Saint Ignacious used the nace catholic in year 102 so you are wasting your time.
The video cuts off on the end. It looks like there is a transcript on your website that contains the full ending.
You can visit our website www.theology-academy.org
Was the Didache considered Scripture 1900 years ago?
No it never was but it was written around the time of the apostles and is helpful to understand the early church
So did the Didache say anything about Jesus, the resurrection ??
Anything which provides clarity and authenticates Jesus's teachings must be good!
Yes it's the first Catholic catechism. ⚜
Catholic - not in reference to Roman Catholicism.
Yep
@@TheologyAcademy It is Roman Catholic. This is the only Church which existed at the time, and is still the One True Church as founded by Jesus Christ Himself. The Pope is the Successor of St Peter.
@@michaelhaywood8262 The Church of Rome was not the only the church in the first few centuries of Christendom. In fact, the first church was the Church of Jerusalem.
@@TheologyAcademy_AR There is only One Church, that Jesus founded, now there were different geographical communities in the early church,. But Jesus appointed apostles to lead his church of which Peter was the leader. His successors keep the stewardship bestowed on Peter by Jesus. That is why the Church of Rome is according to St Irenaeus "of preeminent authority".
Catholic teachings found in the first century until now.
NOT ROMAN!!!
@@lewiscarey1593 according to who? According to protestants who know nothing and resorts to lying
The didache is not cannon , or inspired or considered the word of God. Very helpful though and encouraging. The 1st church was called “The Way” not the Roman Catholic Church 😮, Roman Catholic is the advent of mans traditions helping humans reach God. Very simpler to the Pharisees one could argue, God needed help so man stepped in with traditions to help God.
Where does the didache say prophets should be given 10% of people’s money or food?
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. John 3: 16-18
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power Col 2: 8-10
Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the
new moon, or of the sabbath day: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.: Colossians 2:16-17
Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world, why, as though ye
lived in the world, are ye burdened with traditions Colossians 2:20
AMEN !
Scriptures are KING
Paul wrote "Do not beyond what is written" ( 1Cor 4:6 ) This was Pauls's 'rule'! Also Jude ( Jesus's half brother) wrote about "The faith that was delivered once for all to the holy ones" ( Jude 3). Thus a Christian needs NOTHING MORE than the Holy bible. No manmade rules and regulations and requirement to please God & jesus Christ! The mistakes of the pharasees were now duplicated by the chuerch leaders from the latter half od the first & into the second century! We dont need the 'Didache' or any other 'handbook' to prove we are serving Christ!
AMEN !!
The problem is that your interpretation of the Bible can be wrong as evident of the multiple interpretations in the Protestant world. You are merely replacing the authority of the Catholic Church with your own authority.
@@brycebensing How can that be? because I dont agree with the Protestant world as you claim! I believe you are BOTH wrong! Sorry I say this with much respect for catholics who are often much more sincere about their faith than anglicans. I am happy to discuss any catholic doctrine and consider if it fully agrees with the Holy bible's teaching! You suggest one teaching and I will be happy to reply. We both have faith, let it unite us
@@kiwihans100 I am unsure about what your comment entails. IF you assumed i was anglican (I am Catholic) My point was that protestants claim they follow the bible alone when in reality they are merely replacing the authority of interpratation from that of the Catholic Church, to themselves.
Sola Scriptura is a self defeating logic. Nowhere in the bible does it state that the Bible alone is authoritative and even then nowhere in the bible does it states that only 66 books contain the word of God.
Tradition AND Scripture are authoritative.
Catholicism:
Magisterium + Scriptures = Authoritative
Protestantism:
Self Interpretation + Scriptures = Authoritative
@@brycebensing Thank you for clarifying that. Can I ask you. 'Should church tradition ENHANCE scripture? What on the other hand does a person do if he finds that a church tradition CONTRADICTS the scriptures, especially the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, or even the Apostle peter?
So why did the writers of the Didache suggest a baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, when the disciples were baptizing believers invoking the name of Jesus?
...doesn't anyone have to translate this video into Brazilian Portuguese?
It says 63 comments but I only see one
Didache , baptism with fast,first fast
Instead of giving money to pastors, give money whats called alms to the handicapped people of faith. Where the apostles orked with their hands, where tge faith is free. Where teaching the true faith is hard to find.
The Didache: satan's best attempt to creep religious works into the New Covenant
This is the source of the false teaching that contradicts both the apostle Peter in Acts 2 and Paul in Acts 19
to baptize ONLY in Jesus Name. Almost ALL THE CHURCHES have falsely baptized according to the Didache.
No wonder there is no power in the body of HIS believers. Are they even saved? The Reformers even teach that baptism is
NOT NECCESSARY, even though Jesus SPECIFICALLY SAYS that NO ONE can enter the Kingdom of God without having been baptized,
per John 3.5. Doesn't ANYBODY read the scriptures, or are you ALL just followers of men? The Lord's prayer says that things should
be done "on earth as it is in Heaven." Jesus never authorized trinitarian teaching. He also said to NOT USE vain repetition,
as the heathen do. Jesus CLEARLY says, "If you LOVE ME, you will KEEP MY COMMANDMENTS! He also clearly stated, "Let your light
so shine before men, THAT THEY MAY SEE YOUR GOOD WORKS and glorify your Father in heaven! How many serious contradictions
do we need in order to be disapproved by Heaven? Jesus said this in Mt.13;
"Hearing you will hear and shall not understand, And seeing you will see and not perceive
For the hearts of this people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing,
And their eyes they have closed, Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears,
Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them."
Also read John 12.44-50.
The didache describes beautiful the Lutheran church, the true catholic and apostolic church.
No it doesnt
Lmao,Lutheran,you clearly illiterate
When you name your false church after a man and not Christ
baptism and Eucharist.. so catholic
Basically, the early Christian's were very similar to Catholics and Orthodoxs
@@vecturhoff7502 I see not a trace of evidence for that in the Didache. Baptism and Communion/Lord's Supper, which is was called in the bible, before the Latin term, Eucharist came about, are completely Christian and don't belong to any one branch of it.
@@saintejeannedarc9460 Where do you get your stupidity from
You are pronouncing it wrong
Jesus was baptised by John the Baptist. the "Baptism Of John." what faith was he baptised into? he almost certainly was not baptised in the name of the father, the son, and the holy ghost. John the Baptist was probly an Essene. Jesus, if he actually existed, became an Essene asa result of his baptism. the Holy Spirit was a later Christian invention, not known of by John the Baptist.
Mark 1:7,8 I have baptized you with water,but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.
"Was probably" heretic and their conspiracy theory man 😅😅
We have Jesus teachings in the BIBLE.
We don't need the DIDACHE.
I mean, sure, we don't need your comments nor this video nor UA-cam also.
read it first before you expose your ignorance
Haha.. Christians read hundreds of 'Christian books" by all kinds of authors so why not this one!? I would add the Teachings of Silvanus.
The Didache is pretty much straight from the bible. There was not an organized bible canon back in the 1st Century. There were letters and epistles of the apostles and early disciples, like we see in our bible now. They were read in early churches, as the OT sections of scripture were read in synogogues of Jesus' day. Christian writings like the Didache were distrubuted among churches too. These kinds of writing were very important, because it is an instruction manual of how an early church would operate. I'd suggest looking it up. It puts the notion of the Catholic church being there in all its practices to the side. The Didache had no Catholic language,and though it speaks of Communion, but calls it the Thanksgiving, it doesn't mention Eucharist, unless that is inserted by translators.
Of course we do, but the Bible was not canonized until the 7th century. If you are saying today’s Christians are more prayerful and faithful to the Lord, I think you are wrong. Also, do you think the discourse between the Roman and St Paul to whom he was chained are recounted in the NT? Of course not, but that’s because the ancient world, and the ancient church, trusted tradition handed down orally, since most were illiterate.